| Author |
Message |
| mith |
Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 2:23 pm Post subject: 1 |
|
| I suspect SFF will carry it there. |
|
 |
| dethwing |
Posted: Tue May 31, 2005 2:05 pm Post subject: 0 |
|
| Ah nuts. So close. Gives me a little hope that it might not make it past the Hobbit though. |
|
 |
| zorT |
Posted: Sun May 29, 2005 1:41 am Post subject: -1 |
|
| Mackay = absolutely right. |
|
 |
| Dmi |
Posted: Fri May 27, 2005 10:27 pm Post subject: -2 |
|
But The Two Towers had the least amount of action. Come on, Frodo and Sam moved about 100 feet through the entire book.
*hopes for voters giving LOTR a break over the weekend* |
|
 |
| Courk |
Posted: Fri May 27, 2005 10:18 pm Post subject: -3 |
|
| I read a much greater portion of TTT than any of the others, so I guess I kind of agree with Mackay. |
|
 |
| dethwing |
Posted: Fri May 27, 2005 9:59 pm Post subject: -4 |
|
| Mackay = Slightly Insane |
|
 |
| Mackay |
Posted: Fri May 27, 2005 9:25 pm Post subject: -5 |
|
| Two Towers = the best of the three. |
|
 |
| dethwing |
Posted: Fri May 27, 2005 4:23 pm Post subject: -6 |
|
| RotK was only slightly better than Two Towers. |
|
 |
| Jedo the Jedi |
Posted: Fri May 27, 2005 3:43 pm Post subject: -7 |
|
| You know, dethy, there were three books in the LotR. If Fellowship can't make up for Two Towers, can RotK help any? I'm sure you've already voted, but it might help me to feel better. |
|
 |
| dethwing |
Posted: Fri May 27, 2005 3:39 pm Post subject: -8 |
|
I can't believe it. LotR might lose in the first round?
...There IS a God! |
|
 |
| Dmi |
Posted: Fri May 27, 2005 2:10 pm Post subject: -9 |
|
If, LOTR loses, then there won't be a Lord of the Division.  |
|
 |
| dethwing |
Posted: Mon May 23, 2005 1:40 pm Post subject: -10 |
|
| If it was just Fellowship, I'd vote for it. But...Two Towers is just too bad to make up for Fellowship's Good. |
|
 |
| mith |
|
 |