| Author |
Message |
| groza528 |
Posted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 11:44 pm Post subject: 1 |
|
| Amb wrote: |
| Pokemon encapsulates a huge variety of creatures. This definitely makes them more 'Interesting'. |
I *also* agree, but I was forced to vote against them on the grounds that I find it difficult to call them a single species. |
|
 |
| Dented Ford |
Posted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 10:01 am Post subject: 0 |
|
| Amb wrote: |
| Pokemon encapsulates a huge variety of creatures. This definitely makes them more 'Interesting'. |
I agree, although they are "cartoon shallow". In their heat I stopped to consider, and found what I felt to be a better candidate - but head to head here, not much of a contest. |
|
 |
| Lepton |
Posted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 9:32 am Post subject: -1 |
|
| Abstain. In their original conceptions, neither were particularly interesting. Frankly, I find their pop-culture incarnations to be really annoying. (give me Jar Jar Binks and Ben 10 any day) |
|
 |
| lexprod |
|
 |
| JDTAY |
Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 9:27 pm Post subject: -3 |
|
Hey, have you guys heard about Pokemon 5?
Zoroark says "Give Nintendo yer moneez!" |
|
 |
| wordcross |
Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 9:14 pm Post subject: -4 |
|
| yeah, i filled out the brackets like i thought it would usually go, and honestly I came up with pokemon every time. They'll probably lose before the final round, but really they are more "interesting" than a lot of other entries. More facile, certainly, but interesting none-the-less. |
|
 |
| lexprod |
Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 8:58 pm Post subject: -5 |
|
| Amb wrote: |
| Pokemon encapsulates a huge variety of creatures. This definitely makes them more 'Interesting'. |
Also: how do they fit in those balls?! Though I suppose that makes the pokeballs more interesting. |
|
 |
| Amb |
Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 7:40 pm Post subject: -6 |
|
| Pokemon encapsulates a huge variety of creatures. This definitely makes them more 'Interesting'. |
|
 |
| lexprod |
|
 |