| Author |
Message |
| Amb |
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 6:45 pm Post subject: 1 |
|
Thanks guys.
You all played good games, and none better than bgg1996 whose gambit should have won him the game. I would definitely have voted for him to win had I been in the jury.
And my humblest apologies to Zag who became a target once he said he was secure in an alliance already  |
|
 |
| MNOWAX |
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 3:08 pm Post subject: 0 |
|
Wow
who else voted for Amb? |
|
 |
| Sentran |
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 5:09 am Post subject: -1 |
|
| Congratulations Amb! |
|
 |
| Undercover Monk |
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2011 4:18 am Post subject: -2 |
|
hey guys cant be online long but I did get word's vote. and by a vote 0f 3-4
Amb wins survivor.
sorry for the lack of build-up and sorry this took so long but congrts amb and thanks for playing |
|
 |
| Amb |
Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2011 12:06 am Post subject: -3 |
|
Drat .
Thanks for the game anyway. Whatever happens I had a lot of fun. I feel most sorry for Zag who I approached and was sure he was safe. I got a big kick out of the votes panning our way. |
|
 |
| Undercover Monk |
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2011 11:51 pm Post subject: -4 |
|
| sorry sentran thats not how it works the jurors have all the power If word doesnt say anything I will let you concede but its in words court |
|
 |
| Sentran |
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2011 12:29 am Post subject: -5 |
|
Since we've been waiting this long already, I'll do the honorable thing.
Amb played the game much harder than I did. I admit that I tried my best, but I did not have the level of dedication that he did. He deserves it more.
I hereby concede the game to my honorable teammate/opponent, Amb. |
|
 |
| Amb |
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2011 12:14 am Post subject: -6 |
|
That sounds like its 3:3 and Wordcross gets to pick the final winner. |
|
 |
| Undercover Monk |
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2011 11:16 pm Post subject: -7 |
|
| I actually still need one vote from wordcross. |
|
 |
| MNOWAX |
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2011 3:34 pm Post subject: -8 |
|
| just announce Sentran as the winner already! |
|
 |
| Sentran |
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2011 1:51 pm Post subject: -9 |
|
| zzzz |
|
 |
| Amb |
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 9:10 pm Post subject: -10 |
|
Sorry to hear that jbvntx. I feel like you missed out on the most intriguing and fun part of the game by that.
So how many votes are we missing? I'd really like to see a conclusion, even if I dont get a single vote, just for the sake of the game and to appreciate the mods efforts. |
|
 |
| jbvntx |
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:39 pm Post subject: -11 |
|
| I'd like to give my immunity token that I never had a chance to use to sentran, and then vote amb off. I was never a fan of all of the back-stabbing dealmaking kind of tactics, sorry, amb. |
|
 |
| MNOWAX |
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:27 am Post subject: -12 |
|
| Can we say Sentran won yet? |
|
 |
| Ctorj |
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 12:16 am Post subject: -13 |
|
| I have no questions for either of them. Actions speak louder than words. |
|
 |
| Sentran |
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 1:39 pm Post subject: -14 |
|
| I was more active in the beginning of the game, and I recall contacting others to help secure votes in Amb's favor, although it was far enough back that they do not show up in my sentbox any longer. I also thought I had a sound strategy going into the first game, because I did not realize we were allowed to look up strategies for that type of game while we were playing. Also, as I've said, I've never watched the show. I had no idea how the challenges worked, or the tribal council, or the importance of alliances and backstabbing. I was the perfect patsy for Amb's ambition. |
|
 |
| lexprod |
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 10:18 am Post subject: -15 |
|
| Mk I have a question for Sentran. What you call loyal and integrity others might call being a sucker or lazy. Besides agreeing to Amb's strategy, did you make any active contributions to get yourself where you are? Recruiting allies, winning challenges, coming up with strategy? |
|
 |
| Amb |
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 4:44 am Post subject: -16 |
|
| Did you prod them to start with? I was hoping they'd ask us some questions. |
|
 |
| Undercover Monk |
Posted: Sun Oct 16, 2011 12:05 am Post subject: -17 |
|
still need many votes dont make me go sending prods people  |
|
 |
| Undercover Monk |
Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 2:41 am Post subject: -18 |
|
oops my bad LOL  |
|
 |
| Amb |
Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2011 7:01 pm Post subject: -19 |
|
| Yeah, unfortunately my question was directed to the jury rather than the mod. |
|
 |
| lexprod |
Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2011 9:48 am Post subject: -20 |
|
| Undercover Monk wrote: |
| I would have to check my notes but I believe it was jbvntx |
Uh...should we know this before the vote? |
|
 |
| Undercover Monk |
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 9:06 pm Post subject: -21 |
|
| I would have to check my notes but I believe it was jbvntx |
|
 |
| Amb |
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 6:49 pm Post subject: -22 |
|
There is no doubt, even with HyToChaz not showing that you guys had the numerical advantage. All my wrangling should not have achieved what it did.
So my big question is: Did anyone (Zag?) find the 1st hidden immunity idol? |
|
 |
| Amb |
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 6:45 pm Post subject: -23 |
|
| But my manipulation was out of sheer desperation. We went into the merger not 1, but 2 down. If I was going to secure a vote from someone on the other tribe, I had to offer something. That something was actually Lexprod. I wanted to keep Sentran where possible. And in fact, I did. I kept my word to him. I kept my word to Ctorj - despite it not working out. I only stabbed Lexprod (3 times) because he would win. In my opinion there are many players in the jury who deserved to win. I personally would vote Bgg to win - his gambit play should have won him the game. Zags loyalty was admirable. Wordcross did stick it out too, though his pulling out of the maze may have cost him the game had he come through. |
|
 |
| Sentran |
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 5:22 pm Post subject: -24 |
|
See what happens when I take a day off from GL?
I believe I played a good game. Perhaps not the best, but a good game nonetheless. I would like to add at this point that I've never watched Survivor, and I was just trying my best with whatever the game threw at me. As for "riding Amb's coattails", I did indeed agree to an alliance early on. I did not violate the alliance, or try to throw Amb under the bus, even though he did plan such for me. He decided to stick with me because I was the only real option left to him, and because he felt I would be easily manipulated and easy to get rid of later. So, in summation, I guess your vote comes down to one simple fact. Would you rather vote for someone that was honest and honorable throughout, or someone who was manipulative and underhanded? The choice is yours. |
|
 |
| Amb |
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:53 am Post subject: -25 |
|
| I would always vote MNO out first. He is the Hantz of this game. |
|
 |
| MNOWAX |
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:36 am Post subject: -26 |
|
Cross post from te main GL thread at request of mod....
| MNOWAX wrote: |
What you thinking you were going to have my support? MUWHAHAHA!!
I ALWAYS have an ulterior Motive Amb, yours is just to come!
in fact, i will show you exactly what i wrote to everyone...
| Quote: |
| I'm trying to get enough people to vote for Sentran as a final act of defiance against Amb. I knew he would make it this far ( and at one point I helped him stay alive!) and to take second place again, would frankly kill him. Yes, you could say this is vengeance, but thats how we all should enjoy it. |
|
|
|
 |
| Amb |
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 12:16 am Post subject: -27 |
|
And it would seem that MNOWAX is trying to convince everyone to vote Sentran - but I ask you all to consider who deserves most to win. If that IS Sentran, because lets face it, he didnt play a bad game, then I have no problem with that. But if it is because MNOWAX simply wasnt good enough to survive the first vote out, then thats a shame. But I think I played better and harder than Sentran, and I did genuinely try to contact all players and talk to them. Not all replied, and those that did had other alliances.
My record speaks for itself. Our tribe went in with less numbers. I was then surrounded by enemies after BGG's (Brilliant) play turned my game totally on it's head. Yes I got lucky that MNO gave me that immunity. And it took a lot of work to finally get rid of Lexprod. Were their real justice, Lexprod and Bgg1996 would be the final two. Ctorj would have had a real shot too. As I said before, it was only one bit of bad luck that saw him go when he did. |
|
 |
| Amb |
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 6:21 am Post subject: -28 |
|
| And I felt I had no choice with Lexprod. He was universally liked. If he made the final 2 he would win. If Bgg made the final 2 after how he screwed me over, I'd have voted him to win. If anyone else felt the same, then he had to go. |
|
 |
| Amb |
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 6:16 am Post subject: -29 |
|
| Well now, here is the scenario as I see it: I survived my team being low on numbers. I survived Zag telling me he had an alliance. I survived even when I was going to go home if I lost immunity. Sure MNO gave me a gift immunity. Sure I lied through my teeth about the post BGG made about my PM. (I had planned to turf Lexprod asap). Sure I had planned to screw Sentran over too - my intention was to be final 2 with bgg before he threw that out the door on me. I enjoyed playing with you all. I regret voting out MNOWAX. I attempted to save Ctorj, with no success. Only a PM that Sentran didnt get in time caused Ctorj to go when he did. Overall I pulled my game out of nothing, and survived a mine field. I deserve this win, and I can only hope that you all agree. Give me a chance to answer honestly and you will see that Sentran has not done enough to win - he merely rode my coat tails. |
|
 |
| MNOWAX |
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 4:13 am Post subject: -30 |
|
| I'm here waiting to put my vote behind someone. |
|
 |
| Undercover Monk |
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 3:01 am Post subject: -31 |
|
Lets bring in our jurors:
MNOWAX, Ctorj, Zag, jbvntx, bgg1996, lexprod and wordcross.
So to start with I will ask our two finalist to make an opening statement. Then our jurors will be allowed to ask any question they want of the finalist. Or simply make a statement. The questioning will last a week. I will need your final votes for who wins the game by Next Sunday at 10PM EST.
Sentran, Amb your up. |
|
 |
| Undercover Monk |
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 2:57 am Post subject: -32 |
|
I meant to just have you announce your decision in thread but with the only vote Wordcross you have been eliminated as our final juror. Congrats to Amb and Sentran its been a long tough road. Thanks for giving this game all you had.
WELCOME TO FINAL TRIBAL COUNCIL |
|
 |
| Amb |
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2011 2:11 am Post subject: -33 |
|
So do I wait, or do I vote  |
|
 |
| Amb |
Posted: Mon Sep 12, 2011 1:09 am Post subject: -34 |
|
| I think we all know, that if you Lex got to the final 2, you would have won this game. |
|
 |
| lexprod |
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 11:44 pm Post subject: -35 |
|
Hah, I guess when Amb's not an option the choice is easy eh?  |
|
 |
| Amb |
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 11:34 pm Post subject: -36 |
|
| Yes, congratulations all. |
|
 |
| Undercover Monk |
Posted: Sat Sep 10, 2011 7:46 pm Post subject: -37 |
|
With 3 votes I have enough to determine who is going home.....
Vote 1: Lexprod............
Vote 2: Lexprod...........
with three vote.....
Vote 3: Lexprod
Lexprod bring me your torch.....the tribe has spoken.
Well congratulations on making the final 3. I will post the final immunity challenge by Monday. No treemail this time but I promise you the challenge will be amazeing. Grab your torches good night. |
|
 |
| Sentran |
Posted: Fri Sep 09, 2011 2:32 pm Post subject: -38 |
|
| Quote: |
| Sentran: This is the last chance for an immunity idol to be played do you think anyone will play one? |
They would be foolish not to, but I'm not sure how many are left out there.
Everyone: Who do you think has the best shot of winning the whole thing?[/quote]
Anyone's game at this point. |
|
 |