| Author |
Message |
| Suspence |
Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2012 3:39 pm Post subject: 1 |
|
| Sure, I've got an idea for one. |
|
 |
| DF* |
Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2012 8:24 am Post subject: 0 |
|
Well... I thought Suspence was the one who won really. I just spammed the key, but thanks anyway.
Suspence do you want to take the next one? |
|
 |
| TGC* |
Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 2:21 am Post subject: -1 |
|
From where I am standing, GL time would clearly demonstrate the spam rule. Not sure where the snag is...
WD DG GG DF |
|
 |
| Jedo the Jedi |
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 9:43 pm Post subject: -2 |
|
| That was dirty. |
|
 |
| Duke Gnome |
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 9:32 pm Post subject: -3 |
|
Congratulations Dented Ford. Yes it is just the reversal of the last 2 digits in the timestamp. (Sorry to anybody who lives in an area offset by 30 minutes from GMT, but you can't please everybody.)
MattV: xx00 would be 100% spam. Yes that means it was impossible to create a spam-free post. |
|
 |
| MatthewV |
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 9:28 pm Post subject: -4 |
|
So how do I get 100% spam  |
|
 |
| Jedo the Jedi |
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 9:26 pm Post subject: -5 |
|
| So, we've concluded it's the last two digits of the timestamp backward? |
|
 |
| DF* |
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 9:24 pm Post subject: -6 |
|
| But I wasn't, so it was 42% spam (as might this be if I hurry) |
|
 |
| DF* |
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 9:24 pm Post subject: -7 |
|
| And the one above (and possibly this one, if I'm quick enough) will be 32% spam |
|
 |
| DF* |
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 9:23 pm Post subject: -8 |
|
| So the post above will be 22% spam, I believe |
|
 |
| DF* |
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 9:22 pm Post subject: -9 |
|
| Well yes... |
|
 |
| Suspence |
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 9:20 pm Post subject: -10 |
|
There have been 3 posts at X:09. All are 90% spam.
There have been 2 posts at X:01. All are 10% spam.
Two posts at X:33. Both are 33% spam. |
|
 |
| Duke Gnome |
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 8:58 pm Post subject: -11 |
|
Post 31 is 93% spam
Post 32 is 23% spam
Post 33 is 33% spam
Post 34 is 54% spam
Post 35 is 90% spam |
|
 |
| MatthewV |
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 8:09 pm Post subject: -12 |
|
| Which could be very evil. Because time stamps are put into the time you set in your preferences. This post will be about 12:09 for me. |
|
 |
| Suspence |
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 7:45 pm Post subject: -13 |
|
No problem, signatures may be counted, but something more is going on.
Post 20 is 84% spam
Post 21 is 84% spam
Post 26 is 50% spam
Post 20 and 21 are identical with the exception of the post number, they have the same timestamp.
Post 26 is identical to both 20 and 21, with the exception of the timestamp and post number.
To me, this suggests the timestamp is the key. |
|
 |
| MatthewV |
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 7:33 pm Post subject: -14 |
|
| sorry for copying your signature for my post... but it almost seemed like they were included in the count. |
|
 |
| MatthewV |
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 7:32 pm Post subject: -15 |
|
wax
_________________
I hate people who try to write interesting things in their signature |
|
 |
| Suspence |
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 11:39 am Post subject: -16 |
|
| Related to the time of the post, or the post number possibly... |
|
 |
| Duke Gnome |
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 10:59 am Post subject: -17 |
|
Post 25 is 30% spam
Post 26 is 50% spam
Post 27 is 41% spam
Post 28 is 10% spam
Post 29 is 20% spam |
|
 |
| raekuul |
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 4:02 am Post subject: -18 |
|
| Interesting phenomenon. Apparently it's not just the text of the post that determines the spam percentage. |
|
 |
| raekuul |
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 4:01 am Post subject: -19 |
|
| on |
|
 |
| Jedo the Jedi |
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 3:14 am Post subject: -20 |
|
| I give |
|
 |
| Suspence |
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 3:05 am Post subject: -21 |
|
| wax |
|
 |
| get a clue |
Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 3:03 am Post subject: -22 |
|
| wax |
|
 |
| Duke Gnome |
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2012 11:28 pm Post subject: -23 |
|
Post 19 is 82% spam
Post 20 is 84% spam
Post 21 is 84% spam
Post 22 is 85% spam
Post 23 is 50% spam |
|
 |
| The Great Crep'er |
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2012 6:05 pm Post subject: -24 |
|
mno? |
|
 |
| Jedo the Jedi |
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2012 5:58 pm Post subject: -25 |
|
| I give |
|
 |
| Suspence |
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2012 5:48 pm Post subject: -26 |
|
| wax |
|
 |
| Suspence |
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2012 5:48 pm Post subject: -27 |
|
| wax |
|
 |
| Thok |
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2012 10:28 am Post subject: -28 |
|
| wax |
|
 |
| Duke Gnome |
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2012 9:11 am Post subject: -29 |
|
Post 16 is 23% spam
Post 17 is 51% spam |
|
 |
| Jedo the Jedi |
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2012 3:15 am Post subject: -30 |
|
| Aren't e tired all this spamming yet? |
|
 |
| The Great Crep'er |
Posted: Wed Jul 11, 2012 1:32 am Post subject: -31 |
|
| Jedo the Jedi wrote: |
| Aren't we tired all this spamming yet? |
|
|
 |
| Duke Gnome |
Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 11:32 pm Post subject: -32 |
|
Post 12 was 95% spam
Post 13 was 90% spam
Post 14 was 90% spam |
|
 |
| Suspence |
Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 9:09 pm Post subject: -33 |
|
| |
|
 |
| The Great Crep'er |
Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 9:09 pm Post subject: -34 |
|
| raekuul wrote: |
| Post 8 is 50% spam. |
You're lucky there wasn't a simulpost.  |
|
 |
| Jedo the Jedi |
Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 5:59 pm Post subject: -35 |
|
| Aren't we tired all this spamming yet? |
|
 |
| duke gnome* |
Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 5:40 pm Post subject: -36 |
|
| Jedo the Jedi wrote: |
| Aren't we tired of all this spamming yet? |
If you're tired of spamming, maybe you should stop. Your post was 93% spam. |
|
 |
| duke gnome* |
Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 5:39 pm Post subject: -37 |
|
| Actually post 8 is only 11% Spam |
|
 |
| Jedo the Jedi |
Posted: Tue Jul 10, 2012 5:39 pm Post subject: -38 |
|
| Aren't we tired of all this spamming yet? |
|
 |