| Author |
Message |
| Antrax |
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2003 6:50 pm Post subject: 1 |
|
No, I think it looks ugly. Also, I understand the Hebrew support is lacking. Antrax
------------------ "If it comes down to a choice between being unloved and being vulnerable and sensitive and emotional, then you can just keep your love." -Victor Mancini, "Choke" |
|
 |
| jesternl |
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2003 6:17 pm Post subject: 0 |
|
Antrax, have you tried Opera?
|
|
 |
| Antrax |
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2003 6:06 pm Post subject: -1 |
|
Though your code looks fine. Antrax
------------------ "If it comes down to a choice between being unloved and being vulnerable and sensitive and emotional, then you can just keep your love." -Victor Mancini, "Choke" |
|
 |
| Antrax |
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2003 6:03 pm Post subject: -2 |
|
On Mozilla - Page loads, expanding links do nothing on mouseover. On Explorer - Page loads, I get 2039 annoying populs from Geocities, expanding links work beautifully. Antrax
------------------ "If it comes down to a choice between being unloved and being vulnerable and sensitive and emotional, then you can just keep your love." -Victor Mancini, "Choke" |
|
 |
| Antrax |
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2003 6:02 pm Post subject: -3 |
|
Why wouldn't they? ~goes to test again~ Antrax
------------------ "If it comes down to a choice between being unloved and being vulnerable and sensitive and emotional, then you can just keep your love." -Victor Mancini, "Choke" |
|
 |
| Logain |
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2003 5:57 pm Post subject: -4 |
|
The javascript I wrote in notepad Although I use FrontPage for editing the html text and sometimes the layout. Are you sure the javascript file and graphics are loading completely? |
|
 |
| Antrax |
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2003 5:47 pm Post subject: -5 |
|
Yeah, I get to see the link URL in the status bar/line thingie  (Odds are it doesn't work because you used Javascript code that Microsoft made up, and thus is non-standard. Have you used Frontpage to create your webpage, by any chance?) Antrax
------------------ "If it comes down to a choice between being unloved and being vulnerable and sensitive and emotional, then you can just keep your love." -Victor Mancini, "Choke" |
|
 |
| Logain |
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2003 5:40 pm Post subject: -6 |
|
| Hmm. I never tried Mozilla before. Do you know why it doesn't work? Does anything happen when you move over stuff? |
|
 |
| Antrax |
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2003 5:35 pm Post subject: -7 |
|
And your mouseover doesn't work on Mozilla  Antrax
------------------ "If it comes down to a choice between being unloved and being vulnerable and sensitive and emotional, then you can just keep your love." -Victor Mancini, "Choke" |
|
 |
| Logain |
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2003 5:30 pm Post subject: -8 |
|
| Yeah I'm pretty sure I won't ever switch to frames, but everytime I update my web page after neglecting it for many months, I always consider it and usually make a framed version just for the hell of it to see the difference. One of the problems I would have had with frames is that I have a menu on the left side that expands outward to the right on mouseover scripts. The menu would expand over the main frame of the page. I can't make the left frame bigger cause it would be too large. |
|
 |
| Digglu |
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2003 5:21 pm Post subject: -9 |
|
can't do that with frames i think. tables are better, and if you want images to overlap, you can probably use divs with some creative placement and alpha filtering.
------------------ "You may make no sense, but at least you're enthusiastic about it"
|
|
 |
| Samadhi |
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2003 5:13 pm Post subject: -10 |
|
| Yeah. Don't inflict frames on someone or I'll hunt you down. |
|
 |
| Vinny |
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2003 5:05 pm Post subject: -11 |
|
quote:
Is it possible to make an object/image that is on one frame of a web page overlap the frame next to it?
I am pretty sure you can't. Frames are made up of totally different pages.
I recommend you NOT use frames and use table and the serverside include instead to divide up the different pages. I know how to stretch an image across multiple cells of a table.
Frames sux anyway. A good web page shouldn't use them. |
|
 |
| a little HTML bird |
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2003 3:58 pm Post subject: -12 |
|
| javascript |
|
 |
| The Ktulu |
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2003 3:46 pm Post subject: -13 |
|
| I know very little about HTML stuff. But I do know that each frame has its own set of code, so the answer is probably no (anyone else who knows more can correct me though). Unless you wanted to cut the image into two parts, and use one part on one frame and the other for the other frame. But there would still be complications from that, I would think. |
|
 |
| Logain |
Posted: Mon Jun 16, 2003 2:53 pm Post subject: -14 |
|
| Is it possible to make an object/image that is on one frame of a web page overlap the frame next to it? |
|
 |