| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
daniel801
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2000 4:47 pm Post subject: 1 |
|
|
Could the minotaur respond to our feature requests? i.e., the signature box auto-enabled, etc...
PS in the forums, hyperlinks are hard to pick up on sometimes b/c of their color. what about brightening them?
------------------
anger is a gift |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ghost Post
Icarian Member
|
Posted: Thu Sep 07, 2000 8:17 pm Post subject: 2 |
|
|
Yes;
I'm afraid my attention to feature requests is somewhat lacking, because I have two major feature GL projects I'm working on that eat up most of my free time.
So I'll say that I probably will not have a chance to address any "non-bug" feature requests in the short term. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HyToFry
Drama queen
|
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2001 4:57 pm Post subject: 3 |
|
|
bump.
But I can.
I had two ideas on this.
The first is a check box in your prefs that defaults your sig to on. This would require modifying the user files. That's not a good thing, but if we do some of the other features people are asking about, it's inevidable. The second is a special charactor that you could put as the first charactor in you signature to tell ubb to default it on. "_" might be a good char.. i dunno. ubb would look for the charactor, and if found, strip it off, and default the sig to "on".
I vote yes on this feature. I don't have an opinion on which method to implement. It depends on whether or not we do some of the other features that require changing the member files. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HappyMutant
Daedalian again
|
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2001 5:10 pm Post subject: 4 |
|
|
| Yes, whichever way works best. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Courk
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Thu Aug 02, 2001 5:15 pm Post subject: 5 |
|
|
Geeze Hy, you made me think I missed my birthday.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|