| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Does homeopathy really work? |
| Yes |
|
11% |
[ 2 ] |
| No |
|
72% |
[ 13 ] |
| Maybe yes maybe no, 50% each |
|
16% |
[ 3 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 18 |
|
| Author |
Message |
winterHLepsilon
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2004 9:12 am Post subject: 1 |
|
|
I recently watched a program that talked about homeopathy. (Horizon, Homeopathy:The Test) And I think this homeopathy stuff is fascinating.
Although strict lab experiments show that highly diluted water appear to have no effect whatsoever, the therapy does seem to have the ability to cure patients. Science says homeopathy is nonsense of course. Water containing 1% toxic substance is diluted to such a stage that not a toxic molecule is left, so apparently this IS pure water. But can it cure people of horrid diseases? A renowned French scientist carried out researches and decided on 'the memory of water', and got his findings published in Nature. And then under James Randi (the magician)'s supervison he did the experiments again and ooops--nothing turned up! Total mess! The homeopathy water appeared as dumb as ordinary water. So, his name was ruined in some way. And then Randi said he would give 100 million dollars to any perosn or organization that could prove the meomory of water and nobody dared to try although lots of magical thing about homeopathy occured, including tests on animals proving this definitely wasn't the placebo effect. And then this program Horizon decided to try and --failed.
So does homeopathy REALLY work? What do ya think? _________________ *HL--^H^e^L^en *
=A girl from Guangzhou, China, Asia=
Ask, and it shall be given you;
Seek, and ye shall find;
Knock, and it shall be opened unto you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dragon Phoenix
Judge Doom
|
Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2004 9:18 am Post subject: 2 |
|
|
| it works sometimes in the sense that a placebo sometimes works. It actually is an expensive placebo with a fancy name. IMHO of course. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chuck
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2004 2:35 pm Post subject: 3 |
|
|
| Sick people often get better without any treatment. If you use homeopathy on patients with colds you're going to get a high cure rate. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mole
Subterranean Member
|
Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2004 2:42 pm Post subject: 4 |
|
|
| I diluted my vote to make it more powerful. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lilifreid
DANGER!
|
Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2004 4:15 pm Post subject: 5 |
|
|
You can't dilute a 1% solution to 0%. You may be able to purify the water in another manner, but just adding more water doesn't get rid of the substance. So there may be very few molecules of the toxic substance in the new "treatment", but there aren't zero molecules. Unless they were doing something opther than diluting.
And doesn't homeopathy include techniques other than dosing people with poisoned water? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antrax
ESL Student
|
Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2004 4:33 pm Post subject: 6 |
|
|
But Lili, molecules are discrete objects, so you end up with having a molecule of X in 1 out of 100 bottles, and only water in the other 99, or so.
Antrax _________________ After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
One Skunk Todd
Smelly Member
|
Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2004 5:17 pm Post subject: 7 |
|
|
| Just a slight nitpick. James Randi, http://www.randi.org/ is only offering one million dollars for the successful demonstration of ANY paranormal, supernatural, or quack science phenomena. So far no one has taken him up on his offer. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
extropalopakettle
No offense, but....
|
Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2004 9:21 pm Post subject: 8 |
|
|
I think the definition of homeopathy is the treating of a disease with substances that produce the same or similar symptoms as the disease. That's the basic principle. In practice these substances are diluted, often to the point where all that's in the bottle is pure water. The claim is made that the water has some sort of magical "memory" of the substance - that pure H
2
O that has been in contact with arsenic (but contains no arsenic) is somehow different than pure H
2
O that hasn't. The problem with that is: a) no explanation of the nature of this "memory", b) no experimental evidence for it outside subjective anecdotes, and c) all water would have at one time or another have been in contact with arsenic (for instance).
That said, much of what is labelled (mislabelled?) homeopathic does work. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2004 11:26 pm Post subject: 9 |
|
|
What DP said. I dated a girl once who was into homeopathic remedies. She once brought over to my house a packaged product that exclaimed to be "homeopathic.
I asked her what the ingredients were. She had no clue. The fact that it claimed to be a "homeopathic" product was good enough for her. She didn't want or need to know anymore.
This same woman had worked for 10 yrs + at a hospital nearby in the psychiatric ward. She firmly believed that an upset person could be subdued by feeding squirrels, weaving baskets or watching perching birds eat.
She also had friends who claimed to have been abducted by aliens.
Needless to say, she believed them.
We didn't go out for long. I probably shouldn't share this but she was a redhead and had an orange bush. Not an orange crush, an orange bush.
What is it with women with orange bushes? They have no sense at all, that's what it is. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chief
Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jul 26, 2004 11:28 pm Post subject: 10 |
|
|
| ^.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Legend of Tenshi
I am the_Power!
|
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2004 2:46 am Post subject: 11 |
|
|
Is it just me or was that NMS?
I have a feeling that Homeopathy is the placebo effect in action. When a "Shock, Homeopathy actually works!" article gets published in a good medical journal I will take note. _________________ Tech support sucks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
winterHLepsilon
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2004 8:01 am Post subject: 12 |
|
|
Do you think it is probable that if somebody believs something, puts definite faith in something then that something becomes real to him even if it weren't? _________________ *HL--^H^e^L^en *
=A girl from Guangzhou, China, Asia=
Ask, and it shall be given you;
Seek, and ye shall find;
Knock, and it shall be opened unto you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
winterHLepsilon
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2004 8:11 am Post subject: 13 |
|
|
| Lilifreid wrote: |
You can't dilute a 1% solution to 0%. You may be able to purify the water in another manner, but just adding more water doesn't get rid of the substance. So there may be very few molecules of the toxic substance in the new "treatment", but there aren't zero molecules. Unless they were doing something opther than diluting.
And doesn't homeopathy include techniques other than dosing people with poisoned water? |
The program said that homeopathy was like this, and actually I didn't think I quite understand the procedure.
Add 1 drop of some poison (snake venom, etc..) into 99 drops of water, and shake it (this shaking procedure is said to be the most essential step in the whole thing, coz it sort of let the poison 'mix' in some way with the pure water). Then add one drop of this solution into 99 drops of pure water, and shake, and repeat, and repeat and repeat........till the poson is diluted so thoroughly that only pure water is left in it. _________________ *HL--^H^e^L^en *
=A girl from Guangzhou, China, Asia=
Ask, and it shall be given you;
Seek, and ye shall find;
Knock, and it shall be opened unto you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antrax
ESL Student
|
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2004 8:23 am Post subject: 14 |
|
|
| winterHLepsilon wrote: |
| Do you think it is probable that if somebody believs something, puts definite faith in something then that something becomes real to him even if it weren't? |
What do you mean when you say that something doesn't exist? ("even if it weren't")
Antrax _________________ After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
winterHLepsilon
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2004 8:28 am Post subject: 15 |
|
|
Er...like, well, actually this some therapy doen't work, and you believe that it CAN work, so you take it, and does is work? =confused =
=what is the difference between mind and body? is there a clear boarder between them?= _________________ *HL--^H^e^L^en *
=A girl from Guangzhou, China, Asia=
Ask, and it shall be given you;
Seek, and ye shall find;
Knock, and it shall be opened unto you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antrax
ESL Student
|
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2004 8:36 am Post subject: 16 |
|
|
| winterHLepsilon wrote: |
Er...like, well, actually this some therapy doen't work, and you believe that it CAN work, so you take it, and does is work? =confused =
=what is the difference between mind and body? is there a clear boarder between them?= |
What do you mean when you say "this therapy doesn't work"?
Antrax _________________ After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Legend of Tenshi
I am the_Power!
|
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2004 1:43 am Post subject: 17 |
|
|
I think she may be stumbling across the placebo effect Antrax.  _________________ Tech support sucks |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
winterHLepsilon
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2004 3:37 am Post subject: 18 |
|
|
Maybe I am... And this thing happens in...illusions maybe? I'm not sure. Does believing your mind concern egoism/idealism..?  _________________ *HL--^H^e^L^en *
=A girl from Guangzhou, China, Asia=
Ask, and it shall be given you;
Seek, and ye shall find;
Knock, and it shall be opened unto you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
winterHLepsilon
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2004 4:02 am Post subject: 19 |
|
|
I just thought about something while viewing the post about 0.000000....001 in Visitor Submitted Puzzles. If some toxic substance is diluted to a concentration of 0.000000.....00001%, and if 0.00000....00001%=0, then there is no toxic substance in the solution, just water!!  _________________ *HL--^H^e^L^en *
=A girl from Guangzhou, China, Asia=
Ask, and it shall be given you;
Seek, and ye shall find;
Knock, and it shall be opened unto you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
extro...
Guest
|
Posted: Thu Jul 29, 2004 12:43 pm Post subject: 20 |
|
|
| I once saw an advertisment on the back of a truck for a water filter company that read: "Your body is 65% water. Don't you want it to be pure?" I'm thinking, no, definitely not. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antrax
ESL Student
|
Posted: Thu Jul 29, 2004 3:09 pm Post subject: 21 |
|
|
I wonder if they thought of the Dr. Strangelove reference. _________________ After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tongan Chap
Guest
|
Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2004 10:48 am Post subject: 22 |
|
|
| Quote: |
| And doesn't homeopathy include techniques other than dosing people with poisoned water? |
Yes it does, more so than whats been said in this thread actually. Homeopathy basically is 'treating like with like' with stronger natural compounds than Herbal medicine.
| Quote: |
| Two important ideas on which the science of homeopathy is based are the Law of Similars and potentisation. Simply expressed, the Law of Similars states that since exposure to a substance can cause specific symptoms in a healthy person, that substance—when correctly prepared as a homeopathic remedy—can stimulate the body’s curative powers to overcome similar symptoms during illness. (Taken from the Homeopathic guild of Great Britain) |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antrax
ESL Student
|
Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2004 11:20 am Post subject: 23 |
|
|
Homeopathy isn't science. The theory offers no predictions that are refutable by experimentation.
How do you measure the "strength" of natural compounds?
Antrax _________________ After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tongan Chap
Guest
|
Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2004 4:36 pm Post subject: 24 |
|
|
~Shrugs~
I don't know.............I'm a herbalist  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
casinopete
Emergency Backup Antrax
|
Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2004 4:44 pm Post subject: 25 |
|
|
| Antrax wrote: |
Homeopathy isn't science. The theory offers no predictions that are refutable by experimentation.
How do you measure the "strength" of natural compounds? |
And neither are physical therapy or psychiatry. It doesn't have to be solid science to be effective. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antrax
ESL Student
|
Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2004 4:52 pm Post subject: 26 |
|
|
I've heard this argument before. I'm not quite sure what people want more than statistically meaningful research. Comparative research HAS been done, especially since you're talking about psychiatry, not psychology.
And nobody said only science works. I was just commenting.
Antrax _________________ After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
casinopete
Emergency Backup Antrax
|
Posted: Sat Jul 31, 2004 5:26 pm Post subject: 27 |
|
|
| Antrax wrote: |
| I've heard this argument before. I'm not quite sure what people want more than statistically meaningful research. |
I think people want to be well more than they want statistically meaningful research. fnord.
| Antrax wrote: |
| And nobody said only science works. I was just commenting. |
I realize this, and you realize this, but there are people who would read your comment as an attack against the efficacy of homeopathy, and I was answering for their benefit. fnord.
But a small correction: the "strength" of natural compounds isn't relevant. The remedies are not used in "natural" form, they are processed and succussed into a form that is measurable.
Your point is still strong, though, because every treatment is based on too many individual constitutional characteristics and the personal history of each patient for any experiment to be repeatable. So it is inherently non-scientific, and any arguments questioning its effectiveness based on calling it non-scientific are ridiculous, much the same as in questions of religion or philosophy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|