| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Internet Stranger
Paragon of Mafia Hunters
|
Posted: Sun May 22, 2005 5:59 pm Post subject: 121 |
|
|
Car Wash
Yikes, what a bunch of nutjobs. How could you not love Daddy Rich? _________________ "I didn't know she was your sister I swear!"
www.InternetStranger.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Sun May 22, 2005 6:39 pm Post subject: 122 |
|
|
| Dazed and Confused. sucky... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
shanterusan
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sun May 22, 2005 11:51 pm Post subject: 123 |
|
|
Ju-On: The Grudge
Watched it on DVD *again* this weekend. It's still creepy. Though if anyone has seen the American version (I refuse to see it), I do have some questions about the clicking. Why does Kayako click? (I read reviews.) In Ju-On, she gurgles through the blood in her throat.
Although a gurgling, bonesnapping, bloodsoaked Sadako imitation is rather disturbing, the interviews and making-of included on the DVD make the whole film seem silly. But it doesn't feel silly when you watch it the first time (or two, or so...).
I'm not looking forward to the American remake of Dark Water any more than I want to see their remake of The Grudge.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Master
The Original Mafia Scum
|
Posted: Mon May 23, 2005 3:10 am Post subject: 124 |
|
|
I thought Ju-On was really bad. For some reason, I couldn't take it seriously at all and by the end was in hysterics. Neither scary nor a good story. If you want some good asian horror check out Kiyoshi Kurosawa. He is the only director to ever create a movie that frightened me. _________________ "napalm is nature's toothpaste" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ataraxy
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon May 23, 2005 4:45 am Post subject: 125 |
|
|
Last movie I watched was Closer. I had heard they had edited out Natalie Portman's full frontal, but I thought she would still show her ta-ta's, but maybe I blinked and missed it cause I didn't see it. I was hoping her full frontal would be an extra on the DVD, but no dice.
The characters weren't quite as awful as I had heard. They weren't nice people, but they weren't the men in "In the Company of Men," either. "In the Company of Men" had the worst characters in a movie I liked. "Closer" was pretty good. Stylish, sharp dialogue, smart and strippers. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
shanterusan
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon May 23, 2005 8:30 am Post subject: 126 |
|
|
I agree that Ju-On was a crap story. The method in which the curse mutated was not very believable and the overly polished look spoils the creepiness. Personally the idea of Kayako creeped me out, but that's no thanks to the movie itself. Apparently the original TV movie that this is based on was far scarier, but as far as I know, it's not available internationally and cetainly not here.
Kiyoshi Kurosawa's movies are hard to get here (Brisbane, Australia, which pretends to be cultured but isn't). Korei, Kairo and Kyua I've heard of but probably won't get to see anytime soon. Which of his movie/s did you find scary?
Anyone want to shout me a plane trip to Japan?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antrax
ESL Student
|
Posted: Mon May 23, 2005 3:09 pm Post subject: 127 |
|
|
I watched Episode III, and I think it's terrible. The acting's unbelievably bad (Samuel L. Jackson, what have they done to you?), the plot is ridiculous and most of the fight scenes are done poorly. Also, why does everything in this movie have to make an annoying sound? Whenever they showed Obi Wan riding that... thing, I cringed in my seat as the stupid (though well-rendered) beast raped my eardrums. For shame. _________________ After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Master
The Original Mafia Scum
|
Posted: Mon May 23, 2005 3:34 pm Post subject: 128 |
|
|
The only movie to have ever creeped me out in all the movies I have ever seen was Kurosawa's Kairo. It isn't a startling, loud noise type of "scared", the growing trend and last resort for hack filmmakers, such as SHAMalan, but a fear engenderd in shot composition and a slow, unrelenting story, which allows you to be taken in by the dark absorbing film. And saying you can't get a hold of his movies is not true. Get on ebay and you will find dozens of auctions. _________________ "napalm is nature's toothpaste" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
extro...
Guest
|
Posted: Mon May 23, 2005 3:56 pm Post subject: 129 |
|
|
| Rumor is there is going to be a Hollywood remake (which will undoubtedly suck in comparison, if not suck outright). Would be nice if they'd do an English dub of the original. Subtitles suck - I mean, it's not as if dubs can't be done well (though they're often not). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
shanterusan
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon May 23, 2005 10:03 pm Post subject: 130 |
|
|
I'm afraid that the auctions are dodgy, I don't like ordering from overseas. And don't get me started on my adventures with Amazon...  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Travis
Daedalian Member*
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 12:22 am Post subject: 131 |
|
|
I agree with what The Master said about The Grudge I couldn't sit through the thing, it was awful.
Just saw National Lampoon's Animal Home. It was just okay. [heavy sargassum, it's the best comedy on prime time tv] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Master
The Original Mafia Scum
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 12:39 am Post subject: 132 |
|
|
| extro... wrote: |
| Rumor is there is going to be a Hollywood remake (which will undoubtedly suck in comparison, if not suck outright). Would be nice if they'd do an English dub of the original. Subtitles suck - I mean, it's not as if dubs can't be done well (though they're often not). |
That is no rumour. It is definitely being made and it definitely will suck. =[
I totally disagree about sub vs dub. Dubs both ruin the feel of the movie and make the movie look awful. Can you seriously watch a movie where the voice is not in synch with the lips for the entire movie. I had a hard time sitting through a copy of Aliens where this happened for a little bit of the movie. But the worst part about dubbing a movie is that it destroys what the director and actors wanted for the movie. Even with the best dubs out there (of which there are few), the emotions and feeling of the characters will be drastically altered based on the new way the lines are spoken. Even if you can't understand the language, you can still extrapolate the feelings of the character through the actor's performance. To alter this is unfair to the director and unfair to the audience. Subtitles are not perfect, as they do change the text in translation, but it is certainly the most pure and best way you can watch foreign movies. _________________ "napalm is nature's toothpaste" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 2:49 am Post subject: 133 |
|
|
| When dialog is very fast, reading subtitles distracts one from the visual part of the film. If the visuals are complex, the kind of stuff where your eyes like to wander around the screen noticing the details (good anime comes to mind), and at the same time dialog is fast, you can't digest both. Is it fair to the director or audience that the audience's attention be drawn from spectacular visuals across the screen to focus on reading text at the bottom? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
extro...
Guest
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 2:49 am Post subject: 134 |
|
|
| ^me |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Travis*
Guest
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 2:59 am Post subject: 135 |
|
|
| extro makes a good point and I agree. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Travis*
Guest
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 3:12 am Post subject: 136 |
|
|
except for this....
| Quote: |
| Is it fair to the director or audience that the audience's attention be drawn from spectacular visuals across the screen to focus on reading text at the bottom? |
Life is unfair. Perhaps the directors know this, eh? Maybe they know that life is unfair and the subtitles remind them of Charlie and how lonely he is because he's made of silicone but of course he can't help that.
He may appear to be aloof but only to an insensitive eye. I can tell he has a lot of love to give. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dmi
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 3:14 am Post subject: 137 |
|
|
| I prefer subtitles over dubbing. You can't really mess subtitles up. Dubbing, however, may just be some guy talking throughout the movie for all the different characters. And they could also take the freedom of making sarcasm and stuff like that where there's spposd to be none, and vice versa. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chuck
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 4:58 am Post subject: 138 |
|
|
| Tonight I watched the 2002 version of The Time Machine and Highlander, Endgame. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Samadhi
+1
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 5:39 am Post subject: 139 |
|
|
And you're not dead? Must be all that clean living. _________________ And he lived happily ever after. Except for the dieing at the end and the heartbreak in between. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
extro...
Guest
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 11:05 am Post subject: 140 |
|
|
| Dmi wrote: |
| I prefer subtitles over dubbing. You can't really mess subtitles up. |
The fact that dubbing can be messed up puts it in the same league with almost everything else. Movies in general can be messed up. Perhaps we should stick to books. No. How about staring at a wall? You can't really mess that up. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Samadhi
+1
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 2:52 pm Post subject: 141 |
|
|
Can't mess up subtitles? You should see my copy of Bad Boys II. It's so messed up it's like watching MST3K _________________ And he lived happily ever after. Except for the dieing at the end and the heartbreak in between. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
groza528
No Place Like Home
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 3:11 pm Post subject: 142 |
|
|
I stare at the wall for probably two hours every day at work.
I am in agreement with the subtitlers here. The voice conveys emotions better than does body language. If an actor in an undubbed movie is doing a poor job of convincing us, that's bad acting. It would be a shame to lump a poorly dubbed movie under the same file as a poorly acted movie, and not give the foreign actors their due.
I suspect, but I can't say for certain because I know little about the movie business, that voice actors for dubs aren't given a lot of thought. "The hard part is done; the acting should speak for itself but it would be nice to understand the plot." As such, they generally lack the qualifications necessary to give a quality movie the quality soundtrack it ought to have.
P.S. I bet you don't like letterbox either, huh?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Master
The Original Mafia Scum
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 3:35 pm Post subject: 143 |
|
|
| Anonymous wrote: |
| When dialog is very fast, reading subtitles distracts one from the visual part of the film. If the visuals are complex, the kind of stuff where your eyes like to wander around the screen noticing the details (good anime comes to mind), and at the same time dialog is fast, you can't digest both. Is it fair to the director or audience that the audience's attention be drawn from spectacular visuals across the screen to focus on reading text at the bottom? |
That is a good point and certainly one with which I have to live. I tend to read subs pretty quickly so it doesn't detract from the movie too much can. With anime, since it is such a visual art form and the words don't match up with the lips anyway, I sometimes watch them in english. I try to go through in Japanese the first time and on the second time through, if the dub is good, I will do it in English. Unfortunately for anime, the dubs are usually pretty awful, so I usually just end up watching it subbed most of the time anyway. I guess subtitles are just something you have to get used to. Since there is no perfect way to watch a foreign film, I think subs are the best we have right now. I am just waiting for my babel fish. _________________ "napalm is nature's toothpaste" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Master
The Original Mafia Scum
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 3:42 pm Post subject: 144 |
|
|
Just got done watching Bleeder, Danish director Nicolas Refn's second film, and I thought it was quite good. A little hard to take in some scenes, but certainly worth a viewing.
**1/2 _________________ "napalm is nature's toothpaste" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Travis*
Guest
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 7:32 pm Post subject: 145 |
|
|
Just now watching Spanglish. Looking good, Tea Leoni is funny in her role (and incredibly hot) - A. Sandler plays the part of a restaurant owner, an overly sensitive dad, and husband. The movie seems to have some depth to it and a feel good comedy style and stars an upcoming Spanish born hottie, Paz Vega who wears too much eye liner.
So far, a good film... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dmi
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 7:43 pm Post subject: 146 |
|
|
| extro... wrote: |
| The fact that dubbing can be messed up puts it in the same league with almost everything else. Movies in general can be messed up. Perhaps we should stick to books. No. How about staring at a wall? You can't really mess that up. |
Crap. Isn't even an argument. Just plain crap. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Travis*
Guest
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 8:03 pm Post subject: 147 |
|
|
| ~waits for newbie to get ass paddled~ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dmi
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 8:08 pm Post subject: 148 |
|
|
| Well, I'd rather watch something good. If extro wants o watch something bad, it's his choice/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Travis*
Guest
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 8:42 pm Post subject: 149 |
|
|
Originally posted by Mandlebot Man (aka, the fractal friar)
| Quote: |
| Butterfly Effect was decent for the story but the violence was commonly overly graphic. |
~agrees 97%~ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Internet Stranger
Paragon of Mafia Hunters
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 9:51 pm Post subject: 150 |
|
|
| Travis* wrote: |
Just now watching Spanglish. Looking good, Tea Leoni is funny in her role (and incredibly hot) - A. Sandler plays the part of a restaurant owner, an overly sensitive dad, and husband. The movie seems to have some depth to it and a feel good comedy style and stars an upcoming Spanish born hottie, Paz Vega who wears too much eye liner.
So far, a good film... |
Wait a second, you couldnt even finish the movie first? You were shooting off on here while it was still playing? _________________ "I didn't know she was your sister I swear!"
www.InternetStranger.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
extro...
Guest
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 9:53 pm Post subject: 151 |
|
|
| Dmi wrote: |
| extro... wrote: |
| The fact that dubbing can be messed up puts it in the same league with almost everything else. Movies in general can be messed up. Perhaps we should stick to books. No. How about staring at a wall? You can't really mess that up. |
Crap. Isn't even an argument. Just plain crap. |
Your argument was that subtitles are preferable to dubs because subtitles can't be messed up, while dubs can. Whether or not the premises are true, the argument takes the following form:
X can't be messed up.
Y can be messed up.
Therefore X is preferable to Y.
This argument is easily seen to be absurd by plugging in the appropriate X and Y. That's all. For instance:
A fart can't be messed up.
A violin concerto can be messed up.
Therefore a fart is preferable to a violin concerto. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dmi
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 10:07 pm Post subject: 152 |
|
|
My point was, subtitles can't ruin a movie (unless they're in wingdings, but that won't happen).
If some person starts reading off the script in ways that were unintended (which should happen to some extent), it would ruin at least part of the movie for you.
The only way dubbing would actually not suck, IMO, is if all the actors learned a new language, and then recorded the movie in the other language.
And your type of "logic", well, you're just twisting them, sort of. What you did could be done to practically any argument. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
extro...
Guest
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 10:22 pm Post subject: 153 |
|
|
Subtitles can ruin a movie if the dialog is so fast that reading it would require complete focus on reading, to the exclusion of all attention to the visual aspects of the film.
I twisted nothing, and what I did can't be done to a sound argument.
Dubbing can be done right. If the original actors didn't deliver their lines well, dubbing can even improve it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mackay
Saviour of Spiders
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 10:31 pm Post subject: 154 |
|
|
| Quote: |
| And your type of "logic", well, you're just twisting them, sort of. What you did could be done to practically any argument. |
Welcome to the GL
However, extro was only using the logic you presented.
Now for my two cents, because darn it, I just can't help myself. I prefer subtitles, but I am one of the least visually oriented people EVAR. I generally take my emotional cues from the aural aspect of a film... vocal intonations and the like. I would assume that visually oriented people would take theirs from the actions and expressions of the actors, and that this is therefore a stupid argument based entirely on personal preference. Either the visual or aural experience is going to be marred... it's up to the individual to decide which they'd rather keep intact. No point in calling someone's taste inferior because they absorb their information in a different way.
That being said, I very, very rarely watch movies or even TV. So... *goes back to just lurking, where this thread is concerned* |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Travis*
Guest
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 10:42 pm Post subject: 155 |
|
|
Internet Stranger..
| Quote: |
| Wait a second, you couldn't even finish the movie first? You were shooting off on here while it was still playing? |
You are correct, sir.
What if I was suddenly whisked away to jail or had a heart attack or something? I wouldn't want to pass on without having posted my opinion.
Are you suggesting that I strive to be more thorough? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Travis*
Guest
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 10:51 pm Post subject: 156 |
|
|
Mackay
| Quote: |
| I prefer subtitles,... |
Wjat? So you'd prefer to read the lines at the bottom rather than hear it from the top?!
Have you been playing Shadow OPs again? How much did 'Charlie' pay you to post this crap?! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mackay
Saviour of Spiders
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 10:53 pm Post subject: 157 |
|
|
In response to your questions, Travis:
Yes. No. He offered me a 25% discount. I don't know what you're talking about. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Travis*
Guest
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 10:55 pm Post subject: 158 |
|
|
Are you trying to tell me that a silicone mannequin charges you for sex?Okay. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mackay
Saviour of Spiders
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 11:02 pm Post subject: 159 |
|
|
In order to obtain a silicone mannequin, one needs to buy it. By robbing Peter. I am glad we have reached an understanding. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mackay
Saviour of Spiders
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2005 11:04 pm Post subject: 160 |
|
|
| And who said anything about sex? I want him to sit on my couch scratching himself, drinking beer and hogging the remote. ~rowr |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|