|
|
|
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Sessie
Saucy Chica
|
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 4:10 am Post subject: 1 |
|
|
Let me preface this by saying that I am a clinical insomniac and have to take sleep medications regularly to ever have a chance at a good night's sleep. One side effect of the medicine is groggyness. Another is random-ass thoughts.
So. I was thinking to myself as I fixed Dante's dinner, which was to be his usual bowl of dry kibble, they clearly have this pet food thing nailed down. They have it all figured out: feed him this much of this stuff, this many times a day, and he will be one happy healthy kittycat. And I thought to myself, why can't this be done for people? 8AM, one scoop from the kibble jar...bam, breakfast. 12PM, two scoops...bam, lunch down. One more scoop around 6PM and it's all good til' bedtime. Imagine the end of diets and fast food lunches. Surely some brilliant scientist can figure this out.
Discuss. I'm going to bed. _________________ "I have an everyday religion that works for me: love yourself first, and everything else falls into line." --Lucille Ball |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Ragin' South Asian
Head Poncho
|
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 4:18 am Post subject: 2 |
|
|
| I doubt it would be as hard to make such a thing as to get people to eat it for every meal. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MatthewV
Daedalian Member :_
|
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 4:23 am Post subject: 3 |
|
|
I follow the diet my family taught me. Eat what you like and when you feel like it. If you know something is unhealthy... it probably is. Your body really does know what it needs to keep healthy if you stop trying to over think it.
I have never cared about the nutrition facts that are printed on everything these days. I haven't worried about getting enough vitamin B-236 or avoiding trans fat.
Staying healthy is simple. Eat and get some exercise. We don't need brilliant scientists working on a "problem" our bodies already cope with. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antrax
ESL Student
|
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 6:04 am Post subject: 4 |
|
|
First of all, that's what Chuck does, you can see it in the "What are you eating" thread.
Secondly, I think that was the idea behind peanut butter, or at least I think someone taught me that when I was young and asked a similar question.
Finally, people (unlike pets?) value variance in their food consumption. I know I do. _________________ After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Death Mage
Raving Lunatic
|
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 8:00 am Post subject: 5 |
|
|
Futurama beat you to it. _________________ * These senseless ramblings brought to you by Insanity™. If you just can't figure the dang thing out, it must be Insanity™.
[YOUR AD HERE!] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lepton*
Guest
|
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 10:18 am Post subject: 6 |
|
|
During some days-of-little-means while I was at grad school, I thought about making cookies that would have the right balance of sucrose and starch, the appropriate amount of protein power, a bit of fibre, enough butter to fulfill fat requirements, and some squished-up vitamin and mineral tablets. I ran into two problems: first, it would be a fairly significant start-up cost to get all the vitamins, protein, and so forth. Secondly, I couldn't find a decent "daily requirements" breakdown for everything that people need: I don't know whether this originates from scientific ignorance or if it reflects a fundamental variance in what we actually require.
A few months ago, I ate only candy and chips (and drank only Coke) for a week. My body gave me some pretty clear signs that it wasn't working. I think that, once you've developed the ability to read your body's requirements in broad terms, you can simply rely on the fact that foods have overlapping dietary contributions. In other words, a craving for fruit might mean either that you want Vitamin C or that you want some sucrose. Lucky, fruit has both! So people food would be much harder to match to varying dietary restrictions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jack_Ian
Big Endian
|
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 11:11 am Post subject: 7 |
|
|
When I was in college on an extremely limited budget, Irish Stew performed this function for me.
One pot would take an hour or so to prepare and would last about 3 days, with the final bowl tasting the best.
The worst part was waking up to the smell of it in the morning. Sometimes I skipped breakfast. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antrax
ESL Student
|
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 11:32 am Post subject: 8 |
|
|
I used to live off "student chilli", which was basically ground mystery meat, baked beans and some peppers simmered together until the meat browns. _________________ After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Courk
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 12:58 pm Post subject: 9 |
|
|
1. Why is the recipe for Irish Stew that precise? That is not how you make it. It should say:
Some beef
onion
celery
spuds
carrots*
Combine and cook.
*you need to add the carrots some time before the potatoes so they can get soft.
The potatoes and carrots taste great mooshed together with some of the stew broth, butter, and Worcestershire sauce. I've been known to only eat that for a meal, forgetting that there was meat.
2. They do make this "people food" you refer to -- it's called baby formula (among other things), and it smells horrible. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pablo
Never Draws a Blank
|
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 3:17 pm Post subject: 10 |
|
|
| MatthewV wrote: |
Staying healthy is simple. Eat and get some exercise. We don't need brilliant scientists working on a "problem" our bodies already cope with. |
Staying ignorant is even simpler. If you know nothing about nutrition, you can still stay "healthy" through your 20's, 30's, probably your 40's, possibly into your 50's. After that, you will require costly assistance in the form of medical attention and daily medication, either pills or injections. So your time of staying healthy is limited, whereas ignorance can be a lifetime state.
The statistics on Americans who are deficient in one or more vital nutrients are staggering and the overall state of health, especially among older Americans is sad. What we don't know about nutrition is hurting us.
But Matthew, I do agree with you on the exercise part.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pablo
Never Draws a Blank
|
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 3:20 pm Post subject: 11 |
|
|
| Sessie wrote: |
And I thought to myself, why can't this be done for people? 8AM, one scoop from the kibble jar...bam, breakfast. 12PM, two scoops...bam, lunch down. One more scoop around 6PM and it's all good til' bedtime. Imagine the end of diets and fast food lunches. Surely some brilliant scientist can figure this out.
Discuss. I'm going to bed. |
The animals only accept it because they have no choice. When I hear a dog or cat say that they like this program of monotonous dining, I'll consider it for myself.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Samadhi
+1
|
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 3:40 pm Post subject: 12 |
|
|
My cats always have a full bowl of food but hang around me in the kitchen (hoping for tasty bits) "saying" the contrary. _________________ And he lived happily ever after. Except for the dieing at the end and the heartbreak in between. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pablo
Never Draws a Blank
|
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 4:18 pm Post subject: 13 |
|
|
| I think it's time to hear another of Sessie's "random-ass" thoughts. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sessie
Saucy Chica
|
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 8:46 pm Post subject: 14 |
|
|
Stick around until about 10:30 tonight after I take my Ambien (honestly, I have only the vaguest memory of posting this thread).
| MattV wrote: |
| I have never cared about the nutrition facts that are printed on everything these days. |
I get it, you're one of those skinny people.
My problem is self-control. What I really need is for someone else to control my food intake, like we do for our pets. I've got no concept of portion control; given the opportunity, I'd probably eat until I exploded.
I think this thought came about after I got out of the shower and noticed how fat I'm getting.  _________________ "I have an everyday religion that works for me: love yourself first, and everything else falls into line." --Lucille Ball |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Samadhi
+1
|
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 10:22 pm Post subject: 15 |
|
|
BTW did anyone else, upon first seeing this thread, think of soylent green? _________________ And he lived happily ever after. Except for the dieing at the end and the heartbreak in between. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wordcross

|
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 10:55 pm Post subject: 16 |
|
|
I've been on facebook too much. I wanted to "like" Samadhi's post. _________________ Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antrax
ESL Student
|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:16 am Post subject: 17 |
|
|
The simple answer is that saying "I have no self control" is simply a way of refusing to take responsibility for your actions. I seriously doubt anyone can lose weight with that attitude. Unless you have reason to believe there's an actual organic problem preventing you from eating reasonable portions, you have to realise that your problem is that you like eating on its own, a lot more than you like being thin.
If you'd like to change that, what you should be doing is figuring out what it is about eating that's so important. For me, it used to be that I was afraid, on some level, that if I don't eat now, there won't be food later (don't ask). So, once I figured that out, it was a lot easier to eat a reasonable amount - whenever I felt bad about "having not to eat" something, I just thought how easy it would be to get the exact same thing later on, which meant there was no sense in eating it right now when I shouldn't.
For you it'll probably be something else. What you could try is simply to avoid eating for a day (or two. Trust me, neither kills you, or has any lasting negative effect on your health), and see what it is you're really missing. Then, see if eating really gets you that thing. If not, then it's easy to eat enough to sate yourself, rather than eat as much as possible.
I probably came off sounding like some sort of cultist there, and I'm sorry, but it worked quite well for me. _________________ After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wordcross

|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:00 am Post subject: 18 |
|
|
I agree with Antrax. My problem is that I eat when I get bored. Which happens too often. So I have to make myself realize that I'm not eating because I'm hungry but because it's my reaction to hit the fridge when I'm bored with a task. _________________ Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pablo
Never Draws a Blank
|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 12:12 pm Post subject: 19 |
|
|
| Antrax wrote: |
| For me, it used to be that I was afraid, on some level, that if I don't eat now, there won't be food later |
I think this is an extremely common thing. I think nature endowed us with this sense of urgency because for most of our time on this planet, that was exactly the truth. If you were a caveman, you better "eat now if you can" because there really may not be food later. Antrax, I think you (and most of us) come by that tendency honestly. Sadly, for many humans, it really is still true.
There are many other reasons people overeat, such as for comfort, because they are petrified of being thin and attractive, because they are using food to medicate some deep emotional problem, etc. I'm no expert on this, but I do watch "The Biggest Loser".  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sessie
Saucy Chica
|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 2:47 pm Post subject: 20 |
|
|
| Antrax wrote: |
| The simple answer is that saying "I have no self control" is simply a way of refusing to take responsibility for your actions. I seriously doubt anyone can lose weight with that attitude. Unless you have reason to believe there's an actual organic problem preventing you from eating reasonable portions, you have to realise that your problem is that you like eating on its own, a lot more than you like being thin. |
I actually thought I was taking responsibility by saying that. I could have gone the "McDonald's Makes Me Fat" route and blamed them, but I know it's my own problem to deal with. You're right, though; I seem to prefer the instant gratification of a tasty meal over the long term health benefits of eating right.
| Antrax wrote: |
| If you'd like to change that, what you should be doing is figuring out what it is about eating that's so important. For me, it used to be that I was afraid, on some level, that if I don't eat now, there won't be food later (don't ask). So, once I figured that out, it was a lot easier to eat a reasonable amount - whenever I felt bad about "having not to eat" something, I just thought how easy it would be to get the exact same thing later on, which meant there was no sense in eating it right now when I shouldn't. For you it'll probably be something else. What you could try is simply to avoid eating for a day (or two. Trust me, neither kills you, or has any lasting negative effect on your health), and see what it is you're really missing. Then, see if eating really gets you that thing. If not, then it's easy to eat enough to sate yourself, rather than eat as much as possible. |
Hmm. Actually, I think you're on to something. About ten years ago, I was standing in line at a restaurant and I fainted. My mom freaked out and sent me to the doctor, who told me I had low blood sugar and I needed to be careful not to go without eating for too long. Ever since then I've been terrified of being hungry. _________________ "I have an everyday religion that works for me: love yourself first, and everything else falls into line." --Lucille Ball |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Courk
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 3:02 pm Post subject: 21 |
|
|
| Eat slower. It takes a bit of time for your body to get the message that you're full, so you could still be eating even after you're full, you just don't know it yet. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Quailman
His Postmajesty
|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 3:23 pm Post subject: 22 |
|
|
Take small steps. When you stop for petrol, don't go into the convenience store and buy anything while the pump is running. In my case one step was to stop clearing my sons' plates into my own pie hole after I was already full. Identify a food that's probably not the best for you in addition to being fattening (for example, ice cream) and stop buying it.
But you can ingest as many calories as you burn without gaining weight, so work on the other side of the equation too. Take up a hobby where you'll get some good exercise. Why don't you try belly dancing? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Tired of his old title
|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 4:25 pm Post subject: 23 |
|
|
| Pablo wrote: |
| Antrax wrote: |
| For me, it used to be that I was afraid, on some level, that if I don't eat now, there won't be food later |
I think this is an extremely common thing. I think nature endowed us with this sense of urgency because for most of our time on this planet, that was exactly the truth. If you were a caveman, you better "eat now if you can" because there really may not be food later. Antrax, I think you (and most of us) come by that tendency honestly. Sadly, for many humans, it really is still true. |
When we have huge, juicy steaks, as the grease drips down my chin, I like to comment "This is so good. It was totally worth the 10,000 calories that we burned chasing down this herd animal with our spears." The GL member Zahariel will usually respond with, "Ummm, Dad?"
So I know EXACTLY why I'm getting fat. It's the fault of the supermarket! The yummy, massive-calorie foods don't run nearly as fast, anymore. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JF*
Guest
|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 5:34 pm Post subject: 24 |
|
|
| wordcross wrote: |
| I agree with Antrax. My problem is that I eat when I get bored. Which happens too often. So I have to make myself realize that I'm not eating because I'm hungry but because it's my reaction to hit the fridge when I'm bored with a task. |
This is me as well. If I even walk through the kitchen, I will open the refrigerator and/or pantry every time, hungry or not. Worse yet, is the compulsion to finish things. If I have a snack, like popcorn, I never set it down until it's gone.
I really want to lose 20 pounds. I know the right diet, and the right exercise routines. I just cannot get motivated. Anyone up for a GL-member Biggest Loser competition? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Quailman
His Postmajesty
|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 5:39 pm Post subject: 25 |
|
|
| JF* wrote: |
| Anyone up for a GL-member Biggest Loser competition? |
We retired that title after awarding to Buzzsaw.
Oh, you're talking about weight.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Tired of his old title
|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 5:45 pm Post subject: 26 |
|
|
To answer Sessie's original question, the perfect people food already exists:
Click here to see it!
All the food groups, and yummy, too!
P.S. I looked at your pictures you have on your myspace page -- you look great! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pablo
Never Draws a Blank
|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:01 pm Post subject: 27 |
|
|
| Zag wrote: |
To answer Sessie's original question, the perfect people food already exists:
|
I thought the only perfect food was Irish Coffee because it has all four major food groups: Alcohol, Caffeine, Sugar, and Fat. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sessie
Saucy Chica
|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:24 pm Post subject: 28 |
|
|
Thanks for the compliment, Zag...but I should tell you most of those pictures were taken about 2 years and 35lbs ago
Lots of good advice in this thread. I'm interested in the GL Biggest Loser thing...how could we work that? _________________ "I have an everyday religion that works for me: love yourself first, and everything else falls into line." --Lucille Ball |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chuck
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:11 pm Post subject: 29 |
|
|
| That pizza isn't quite done yet. The pepperoni slices are supposed to curl up forming little cups of hot grease. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antrax
ESL Student
|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:24 pm Post subject: 30 |
|
|
Can the biggest loser thing be retroactive? I don't want to have to regain those 100 pounds  _________________ After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pablo
Never Draws a Blank
|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 8:30 pm Post subject: 31 |
|
|
| Antrax wrote: |
Can the biggest loser thing be retroactive? I don't want to have to regain those 100 pounds  |
Did you really lose that much? You're kidding, right? I've seen your picture, and I'm thinking you were in the mid 200's tops. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Travis
Daedalian Member*
|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 10:33 pm Post subject: 32 |
|
|
posted by MattV (written in the style of Bad Luck Schlep Rock)
| Quote: |
I follow the diet my family taught me. Eat what you like and when you feel like it. If you know something is unhealthy... it probably is. Your body really does know what it needs to keep healthy if you stop trying to over think it.
I have never cared about the nutrition facts that are printed on everything these days. I haven't worried about getting enough vitamin B-236 or avoiding trans fat.
Staying healthy is simple. Eat and get some exercise. We don't need brilliant scientists working on a "problem" our bodies already cope with. |
Pablo's excellent follow up to that post is worth repeating..
| Quote: |
Staying ignorant is even simpler. If you know nothing about nutrition, you can still stay "healthy" through your 20's, 30's, probably your 40's, possibly into your 50's. After that, you will require costly assistance in the form of medical attention and daily medication, either pills or injections. So your time of staying healthy is limited, whereas ignorance can be a lifetime state.
The statistics on Americans who are deficient in one or more vital nutrients are staggering and the overall state of health, especially among older Americans is sad. What we don't know about nutrition is hurting us. |
Good work, Pablo. Excellent job. It would've been a shame to let the young punk get away with those non thinking comments.
Quailman wrote (about LOser Comp.)
| Quote: |
| We retired that title after awarding to Buzzsaw. |
I was in the loser competition early on but eventually dropped out after making the decision to quit.
You must be thinking of somebody else. Samadhi maybe? Yeah, I think Samadhi won the loser thing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antrax
ESL Student
|
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:31 am Post subject: 33 |
|
|
| Pablo wrote: |
| Antrax wrote: |
Can the biggest loser thing be retroactive? I don't want to have to regain those 100 pounds  |
Did you really lose that much? You're kidding, right? I've seen your picture, and I'm thinking you were in the mid 200's tops. |
It's funny, I've been meaning to post about it in VSN about half a year ago, then decided it's probably not that interesting.
But basically yeah, I went from this:
286 pounds
to this:
186 pounds AND a good Jewish boy
Which is why I feel like I can give people weight loss tips  _________________ After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pablo
Never Draws a Blank
|
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 12:32 pm Post subject: 34 |
|
|
I find it not only interesting, but inspiring and worthy of a heart-felt Mazel Tov!!! How could you NOT tell us???
I'd love to hear more details as to how you did it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Travis*
Guest
|
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 3:43 pm Post subject: 35 |
|
|
| You finally decided to have the family removed. Nice work. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pablo
Never Draws a Blank
|
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 5:53 pm Post subject: 36 |
|
|
| Actually, even in that first picture, you don't look as heavy as I thought you were. The picture I had seen before included blond hair, so maybe that added a few pounds? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antrax
ESL Student
|
Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 5:35 am Post subject: 37 |
|
|
It's a picture mith recently uploaded to facebook, so it might not be me at my prime. But even at my prime, I carried it well. The problem was that you can't really carry diabetes well.
But anyway, from the beginning, and I'm sorry for hijacking your thread, Sessie.
When I started working for Intel I was in the 220-242 range - whenever I would near the 240s, I would eat a bit less and go back to the 220s. I did okay with girls and was healthy otherwise, so I didn't see any reason to bother beyond that. However, all the snacks available to employees and spending literally every waking moment near a computer (either at work, or doing homework) took their toll and made it difficult to go back to around the 220s. For a while I worked out, but wasn't able to keep it up beyond the summer vacation, as during the school year the combination of school and work overwhelmed me. In short, I gradually gained my way into the aforementioned 286 pounds (which, for my height, is obese), and stayed there for a while.
After over a year in that weight, my regular blood tests started showing a deterioration in my health. I'm in, um, risk groups? for both a heart attack and diabetes, and I was showing signs of heading for both (diabetes in leaps and bounds), so it became obvious that it's time to lose weight. My original plan, back when I decided I can live with being obese, was either nanotechnology or some other advancement that lets you lose weight without any effort. Sadly, I won the race against technology (though seriously, those things are just around the corner), so I had to do it the old-fashioned way.
A friend told me she knows someone who does diet workshops. I went there, was wholly unimpressed, told him how unimpressed I was (it was a bunch of New Age bullshit), he explained the scientific basis (he's a doctor that had to lose a lot of weight himself, so he did some independent research) and I decided to go with it - at most I would waste about $350. So I went with it, it worked well for me. What's funny is that the "method" itself is quite simple: just eat a lot less, and only very specific things: green vegetables, fish or chicken breast, etc. The trick was that he gave me the medical assurance that not eating at all for a day or two (at some point, doing it twice a week) is not detrimental to my health in any way. The added benefit was that I finally figured out what hunger was, and now I know when I'm really hungry and when I'm just bored or upset or recognise an opportunity to eat.
So, that's the not-too-abridged version. I reached my target weight (186, which puts me on the high end of normal for my height) late in September 2007, and have been keeping it (with variations of up to 5 pounds in either direction) since. After I gave my body some time to recover, I also started working out at least once a week (most weeks twice, working on finding a third slot) somewhere in early 2008 and have been keeping it up since.
So, that's how I avoided diabetes and also got a hot girlfriend, and that's why it was the best summer vacation ever. _________________ After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Travis
Daedalian Member*
|
Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 8:18 am Post subject: 38 |
|
|
| Good job, Antrax. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pablo
Never Draws a Blank
|
Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 3:00 pm Post subject: 39 |
|
|
That is a great GREAT story! And you thought no one would be interested?
Thanks for sharing that, and yes, by all means, find that third workout spot! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
L'lanmal
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 7:20 pm Post subject: 40 |
|
|
| Sessie wrote: |
So. I was thinking to myself as I fixed Dante's dinner, which was to be his usual bowl of dry kibble, they clearly have this pet food thing nailed down. They have it all figured out: feed him this much of this stuff, this many times a day, and he will be one happy healthy kittycat. And I thought to myself, why can't this be done for people? 8AM, one scoop from the kibble jar...bam, breakfast. 12PM, two scoops...bam, lunch down. One more scoop around 6PM and it's all good til' bedtime. Imagine the end of diets and fast food lunches. Surely some brilliant scientist can figure this out.
|
The brilliant scientist you are looking for may or may not have been Dr. Ancel Keys, with his Seven Countries Study leading to the K-ration. Hardly the ideal human food, but perhaps better than feeding puppy chow to humans?
http://www.epi.umn.edu/research/7countries/overview.shtm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K-ration -- And I bet it's even better for you without the cigarettes!
| Quote: |
Breakfast Unit: canned entree (chopped ham and eggs, veal loaf), biscuits, a dried fruit bar or cereal bar, Halazone water purification tablets, a 4-pack of cigarettes, chewing gum, instant coffee, and sugar (granulated, cubed, or compressed).
Dinner Unit: canned entree (processed cheese, ham, or ham & cheese), biscuits, 15 malted milk tablets (early) or 5 caramels (late), sugar (granulated, cubed, or compressed), salt packet, a 4-pack of cigarettes and a book of matches, chewing gum, and a powdered beverage packet (lemon (c.1940), orange (c.1943), or grape (c.1945) flavor).
Supper Unit: canned meat, consisting of either chicken paté, pork luncheon meat with carrot & apple (1st issue), beef & pork loaf (2nd issue), or sausages; biscuits; a 2-ounce D ration emergency chocolate bar, Tropical bar, or (in temperate climates) commercial sweet chocolate bar; a packet of toilet paper tissues; a 4-pack of cigarettes; chewing gum, and a bouillon soup cube or powder packet. |
| Quote: |
| The meals only gained "palatable" and "better than nothing" ratings from the soldiers, but were successful in relieving hunger and providing sufficient energy. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|