The Grey Labyrinth is a collection of puzzles, riddles, mind games, paradoxes and other intellectually challenging diversions. Related topics: puzzle games, logic puzzles, lateral thinking puzzles, philosophy, mind benders, brain teasers, word problems, conundrums, 3d puzzles, spatial reasoning, intelligence tests, mathematical diversions, paradoxes, physics problems, reasoning, math, science.

   
The Grey Labyrinth Forum Index
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups    RegisterRegister  
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Chocolate! Game over. Town wins!
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
 
Reply to topic    The Grey Labyrinth Forum Index -> Mafia Games
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
milkshake
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 2:08 am    Post subject: 81 Reply with quote

Quote:
On day 1 very few lynches are based on anything but guess work. MNO was playing odd as was raekuul. I thought MNO was more suspicious, so I gave my two cents.

I agree wholeheartedly.

But you're completely ignoring the fact that you just went and hammered without waiting for the claim. Claims are, like, the way you get information on day one. Hammering before even giving the person a chance to claim is how scum get mislynches while simultaneously upping their chances of hitting a PR.

By the way, if I had voted you and said "Gogo bandwagon" again, that would be scummy. But I didn't even vote you- all I did was rehighlight the fact that you hammered before MNOWAX even had a chance to claim.

He even came to the thread- but just a few hours too late. He said: "geez that was fast; [claim, but too late]."
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos



PostPosted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 3:11 pm    Post subject: 82 Reply with quote

Ahh but he did respond. Post 63 check it out. This is after your bandwagon post. He didn't claim just kinda resigned. Also as this is chocolate mafia claims are slightly less helpful than usual. We all have weird roles so if you have any creativity you can make up a likely sounding role and get away with it. If you are going to witch hunt please get your facts straight.
_________________
The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
milkshake
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 3:17 pm    Post subject: 83 Reply with quote

Undercover Monk, that post 63 was with all of one vote on him.

Yes, all roles are weird roles but if that note is any indication, we still have confirmable PRs like cop, vig, etc.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos



PostPosted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 3:41 pm    Post subject: 84 Reply with quote

yes one vote and what amounted to two FOS's mine and DP I believe. It was obvious that he was in danger. lexprod aalso had said he wanted a response. He had less than 36 hours left anyway before he would die. If he wanted to claim he had his chance in 63. If you can tell me you wouldnt have felt threatened in his position than I call you brave or stupid. I will have more in a minute I have to go kill someone at pool.
_________________
The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
lexprod
NOT not a title



PostPosted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 4:37 pm    Post subject: 85 Reply with quote

Ugh, short first days suck. I really wish we had time to have more than one bandwagon going so we could have some better reads by now. DP barely posted anything but votes last day, but he is also claiming restricted access.

I do agree that MNOWAX's response was a bit weak, and I think the time factor was an issue, with only 20 hours left before a no lynch. I'm still of the opinion that one of DP UM and milk should hang this day, still not getting the best read.


Quote:
He had less than 36 hours left anyway before he would die.


Well time could have run out and no one would've swung

Quote:
There is some fine print below the numbers.
Without a clear majority, the vote will be 'no lynch.'
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
milkshake
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 4:53 pm    Post subject: 86 Reply with quote

Quote:
If you can tell me you wouldnt have felt threatened in his position than I call you brave or stupid.

I am neither brave nor stupid. Revenge most foul! I would have felt threatened, sure, but definitely not threatened enough to claim.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos



PostPosted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 11:46 pm    Post subject: 87 Reply with quote

And I already addressed the idea of claiming with an undefined role set. Its not like someone can say Im the cop and then we wont lynch them we already had one scum cop. It is a very diferent game we are playing and I think you are deflecting. Which I am too but I'm not scum. So there
_________________
The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
ralphmerridew
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Sat Nov 21, 2009 3:10 am    Post subject: 88 Reply with quote

raekuul's death could have been caused by something like the "nearsighted old man" role from Texas Mafia:
- can choose to stay up at night or sleep
- if he stays up, he has a chance of killing anyone who targets him

That could explain scum getting killed and lack of scumkill.

On the other hand, in games with scum abilities, usually a scum must pass on using his ability to kill, and I don't think the scum could have another ability stronger than that, not without badly unbalancing the game ...

I'll stop before I argue myself in circles.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
lexprod
NOT not a title



PostPosted: Sun Nov 22, 2009 12:35 am    Post subject: 89 Reply with quote

Undercover Monk wrote:
And I already addressed the idea of claiming with an undefined role set. Its not like someone can say Im the cop and then we wont lynch them we already had one scum cop. It is a very diferent game we are playing and I think you are deflecting. Which I am too but I'm not scum. So there


I don't think claiming is as futile as you're making it out to be in this quote. I do think it's a way we can see a person's motives, and if we eventually lynch the claimant, we find out if they were lying and why. Plus it's a chance to get a reaction from everyone else as well, which is key to sniffing out scum. Just cause the roles are weird does not mean they are somehow un-analyzable.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
Dragon Phoenix
Judge Doom



PostPosted: Sun Nov 22, 2009 5:11 am    Post subject: 90 Reply with quote

I would actually argue that the remaining mafia (assuming a 2 pp group) is most likely not on the bandwagon - I know that this can be construed as self defence, but wine in front of me suggests that it is unlikely that both scum would hop on the very first bandwagon together. Then again, with such a small game, most conventional wisdon goes out of the window.

I am not happy with the uncontrolled hammer either, but I like UM's defence. It feels sincere.
_________________
My photography:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/artrock2006/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos



PostPosted: Sun Nov 22, 2009 8:36 am    Post subject: 91 Reply with quote

It wasn't uncontrolled I thought that that was what we had decided. Misguided perhaps but not uncontrolled. hmm. slowed down a bit . I am tired I will do a review later.
_________________
The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
lexprod
NOT not a title



PostPosted: Mon Nov 23, 2009 11:41 pm    Post subject: 92 Reply with quote

ralphmerridew wrote:
raekuul's death could have been caused by something like the "nearsighted old man" role from Texas Mafia:
- can choose to stay up at night or sleep
- if he stays up, he has a chance of killing anyone who targets him

That could explain scum getting killed and lack of scumkill.

On the other hand, in games with scum abilities, usually a scum must pass on using his ability to kill, and I don't think the scum could have another ability stronger than that, not without badly unbalancing the game ...

I'll stop before I argue myself in circles.


ralphmerridew, what's your reaction to the speed at which mnowax was lynched once the deadline went down? You haven't posted much, and this post really says little of anything...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
ralphmerridew
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 2:22 am    Post subject: 93 Reply with quote

After MNOWAX's non-claim, I'm taking it as the pragmatic "We have to lynch somebody" lynch. I don't view the people on the bandwagon as more or less suspicious than anyone else.

One other thing: I'm not sure how useful this information is, but I was targeted last night.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
lexprod
NOT not a title



PostPosted: Wed Nov 25, 2009 3:29 am    Post subject: 94 Reply with quote

Undercover Monk wrote:
It wasn't uncontrolled I thought that that was what we had decided. Misguided perhaps but not uncontrolled. hmm. slowed down a bit . I am tired I will do a review later.


You should do you review sooner. Right now, I'm gonna vote Undercover Monk for his part in the bandwagon, and his statements this day that I've disagreed with. He seemed to prefer to kill anyone than have a no lynch, and he seems to say that claiming is pointless in this game, which I still hold as false.

You've stated that one vote is plenty enough pressure (plus milkshake may throw his on any second) so you probably want to start defending yourself now. I know you're chronically busy when it comes to GL games, but we could use some more substantial response right now.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos



PostPosted: Thu Nov 26, 2009 4:33 pm    Post subject: 95 Reply with quote

Really serious discussion??? I have possibly contribbuted the most this day next to possibly milkshake what have you done your highness. Now I did promise a review but I am on Thanksgiving Break so thats why I haven't taken the time to do anything in depth. I will if need be claim but not until next week probably. Thats all for now football starts soon
_________________
The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Dragon Phoenix
Judge Doom



PostPosted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 4:52 am    Post subject: 96 Reply with quote

After a re-read, I still like UM's defence, I think lexprod is too vocal to be the remaining scum (still assuming one left of course), and I am leaning to ralphmerridew right now as the most likely candidate between him and milkshake. The "I was targeted" can be a red herring - I am also not sure why a townie would throw out that info right now. No vote yet, I want more discussion first.
_________________
My photography:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/artrock2006/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
lexprod
NOT not a title



PostPosted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 6:56 am    Post subject: 97 Reply with quote

lexprod wrote:
I know you're chronically busy when it comes to GL games, but we could use some more substantial response right now.


Sorry this sentence came out as aggressive, I was trying to verbalize that I understood that you aren't on here every day of the week, and yeah now it has been thanksgiving break so I was fine with waiting.

I guess what I meant by "more substainial" was an explanation of what exactly makes claiming so less powerful in this game. It's been pretty much all I've found of interest in this day so far (that and some players' relative silence) so that's why I'm pressing at it, and you didn't respond to my comment on it. I'm not sure that a disagreement on this point justifies my vote anymore though, so unvote.

Here's something more interesting. DP has stated in post 76, 90, and 96, that he assumes or thinks or believes there's only one scum left. However I just re-read raekuul's death post and saw this:

raekuul wrote:
Good luck finding my partners!


Unless raekuul's set up a huge trap for us, that seems to imply that there are more than one scum left in the game. This puts DP in the position of trying to heavily downplay this "slip" on raekuul's part. However, this could just be his own natural assumptions about the balance of the game, I myself thought that there was only one scum left until I reread the post, but DP has put his assumption in EVERY POST he made in this day.

FOS: Dragon Phoenix
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot



PostPosted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 5:13 pm    Post subject: 98 Reply with quote

The great big clock on the wall says:

72:00:00
71:59:59
...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos



PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 3:15 pm    Post subject: 99 Reply with quote

Well first off I am sorry I was short with you guys last week it has been a very stressful Thanksgiving. But I have all my Christmas shopping done and only two weeks left before break, so it should be a relaxing Christmas.

As to why I am against claiming as an end all solution for this game is that we have already had one odd role and knowing my own role and knowing Zag's ability to come up with creative games, I think we can readily expect no simple cop doctor or mafia role. So all the scum have to do is be creative and then they have a decent shot of getting us to believe them. Not that claiming is out of the picture but It provides less information than usual. That means we have to relay more on in thread discussion. As far as that goes I think rm may be the better lynch as he isn't contributing so he isn't much of an asset.... (more to come, including the always helpful scum-o-meter).
_________________
The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
ralphmerridew
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 4:23 pm    Post subject: 100 Reply with quote

We know that there's a cop with ADD who could be controlled by the mafia (see raekuul's role pm).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos



PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 4:38 pm    Post subject: 101 Reply with quote

Oh Scum-o-Meter please give us the answer to this conudrum.

Lexprod: playing as his usual self. At some points aggresive but also reluctant, a good townie trait. Scum rarely doubt themselves townies always doubt themselves. Probably the person I trust the most for now. 3/10

Milkshake: still a bit of an enigma since this is only his second game on the GL, but is making a name for himself. I still don't like the jump on my hammer but he has relaxed my suspicion a little. 7/10

DragonPhoenix: hasn't offered much but then again has done nothing to arouse suspicion. 5/10

ralphmerridew: Has done nothing and is dead weight a good lyn regardless 6/10

Undercover Monk: Most definately town. He is the most likely to save the town with his brilliant plans and charming smile. 0/10 Enthusiastic Grin


So what do you think I'm leaning toward a rm lynch as a way to do some housekeeping and the partnerS comment scares me a little but this is Chocolate Mafia.
_________________
The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
lexprod
NOT not a title



PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 6:11 pm    Post subject: 102 Reply with quote

ralphmerridew wrote:
After MNOWAX's non-claim, I'm taking it as the pragmatic "We have to lynch somebody" lynch. I don't view the people on the bandwagon as more or less suspicious than anyone else.

One other thing: I'm not sure how useful this information is, but I was targeted last night.


Quote:
We know that there's a cop with ADD who could be controlled by the mafia (see raekuul's role pm).


Well if we are to believe you on the targeted thing it probably means one of only two things: a cop checked you out (either tried to, or was forced to) or you were supposed to die.

If you could talk at all about the actual discussion happening, or anyone's behavior, especially UM's growing urge to lynch you, that would be nice. So far you've only talked about the NK, being targeted, and that raekuul controlled a town cop, which screams of "look at me I'm talking about the game" while avoiding any real commentary.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
Dragon Phoenix
Judge Doom



PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 6:57 pm    Post subject: 103 Reply with quote

lexprod wrote:
However I just re-read raekuul's death post and saw this:

raekuul wrote:
Good luck finding my partners!


Unless raekuul's set up a huge trap for us, that seems to imply that there are more than one scum left in the game. This puts DP in the position of trying to heavily downplay this "slip" on raekuul's part. However, this could just be his own natural assumptions about the balance of the game, I myself thought that there was only one scum left until I reread the post, but DP has put his assumption in EVERY POST he made in this day.

FOS: Dragon Phoenix


I love it when a townie tries to use the words of a dead mafia to catch the rest - or in this case, probably one (oops I did it again).

I'd be in support of a ralphmerridew lynch on principle. I still don't like that target reveal, and his contributions are if anything less than mine.

UM: as stated, his defence looks genuine.
lexprod: clutching at straws, but very vocal for scum
milkshake: his charge on UM looks town to me.

My ranking right now in terms of suspicion (%):
ralphmerridew 50
lexprod 30
milkshake 10
undercover monk 10
_________________
My photography:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/artrock2006/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos



PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 10:04 pm    Post subject: 104 Reply with quote

Wow I didn't even think about that. Dang you DP I thought I had someone I could trust. Now I'm not so sure. Lexy IGMEOY. (besides can we really trust someone with ties to Lex Corp.

However the fact is rm hasn't provided anything and Lex has tried. Ithink I'll pressure our lurking friend. (We need a lynch but not as fast as day 1)
unvote, Vote: ralphmerridew
_________________
The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
ralphmerridew
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 11:09 pm    Post subject: 105 Reply with quote

What's so bad about revealing that I was targeted, DP? As it happens, if targeted at night, I have a chance of learning who targeted me. Last night raekuul targeted me, so the ADD cop probably did as well.

The mafia presumably know raekuul's move, so I wasn't telling them anything they didn't know.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
lexprod
NOT not a title



PostPosted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:24 am    Post subject: 106 Reply with quote

Zag wrote:
The great big clock on the wall says:

72:00:00
71:59:59
...


I'm assuming same rules as last time? If no lynch by wednesday, there is no lynch?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
lexprod
NOT not a title



PostPosted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:30 am    Post subject: 107 Reply with quote

Undercover Monk wrote:
Oh Scum-o-Meter please give us the answer to this conudrum.

Milkshake: still a bit of an enigma since this is only his second game on the GL, but is making a name for himself. I still don't like the jump on my hammer but he has relaxed my suspicion a little. 7/10


Quote:
Wow I didn't even think about that. Dang you DP I thought I had someone I could trust. Now I'm not so sure. Lexy IGMEOY. (besides can we really trust someone with ties to Lex Corp.

However the fact is rm hasn't provided anything and Lex has tried. Ithink I'll pressure our lurking friend. (We need a lynch but not as fast as day 1)
unvote, Vote: ralphmerridew


Not sure why milkshake completely dropped off your radar, but agree that ralphmerridew does need to contribute more than just one-sentence "here's some more stuff you basically already knew about the role raekuul had" posts.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot



PostPosted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 3:21 am    Post subject: 108 Reply with quote

lexprod wrote:
Zag wrote:
The great big clock on the wall says:

72:00:00
71:59:59
...


I'm assuming same rules as last time? If no lynch by wednesday, there is no lynch?

Correct.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
ralphmerridew
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 4:46 pm    Post subject: 109 Reply with quote

I was checked by the cop last night, and the mafia know it. I figured that the remaining mafia would try to subtly back a bandwagon against me in an attempt to get the cop to identify himself, and I sat back carefully in an attempt to watch for that. I think that UM's been too forward in going after me, but DP's been following the right balance.

Vote: Dragon Phoenix

Those who are still voting for me, I claim
* One of the roles is an ADD cop (from raekuul's role claim)
* I was targeted by raekuul last night.
* Therefore, I was also targeted by that cop.
* I am good.
* I was cleared by that cop last night.

If I were wrong on the last point, the cop would post to say so and get me lynched (especially if, as DP thinks, there's only one scum left).

Does anybody care to contradict me on that last point?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
milkshake
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:26 pm    Post subject: 110 Reply with quote

Back from thanksgiving break... I see this game has been active! Sorry if I seem a little confused for a few posts here. Cannibal

Quote:
Does anybody care to contradict me on that last point?

I assume that you are assuming (erm...) that the cop is quiet because he only has innocent investigations? That makes sense, so no I don't contradict you on that last point.

But... and sorry if you already said this... you're claiming that you were notified that you were investigated? That seems odd to me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
ralphmerridew
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Tue Dec 01, 2009 11:56 pm    Post subject: 111 Reply with quote

My claims related to the cop:
- I have claimed that the cop investigated me last night, and got an innocent result.
- The cop knows whether or not those statements are true.
- If they are false, he would realize I'm lying and accuse me.

As for my abililty, my base claims are:
- raekuul had the ability to set the target of the cop. (given in death post)
- From my role ability, I know that I was targeted by raekuul.

From those two facts, it follows that the cop also targeted me last night.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos



PostPosted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 12:38 am    Post subject: 112 Reply with quote

See this is what I mean about claims being worth very little. With no stretch of the imagination, rm's claim seems right enough. He may even be telling the truth. However there is a very good chance rm is just a scum who can think up a decent role. However I don't like it. This is just a little to obvious. I like my vote where it is. Sorry rm I'm just not convinced.
_________________
The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
ralphmerridew
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 1:06 am    Post subject: 113 Reply with quote

Never mind the exact details of my role. All that matters about it (for now) is that I know raekuul targeted me last night.

UM, did you read read raekuul's role? I'll repost it for you.

the mod in post 74 wrote:
Ok, Lissen up. You is going to be inserted into dis town, and we needs you to make sure dat da mafia win dis one. We gots dis special little tool for you, so don't screw it up. See.

So here's da tool, see? We know dat da townies, dey gots a cop wid 'em. We don't know who dat is, da cop, but we knows dey gots one. But here's da ting, dis cop? He's got dis problem -- it's called Attenshun Deficency somethin or udder. Anyway, he's really easy to distract -- you just gots to put dese clues in front o' him, and he'll investigate who you wants. You can't feed him false info -- he'll see right tru that, but you can manage who he looks into.

You gots to direck him to a different person each night, and you can't just point him at the night-kill target, but utter dan dat, no limits.


Combining that with my claim, it follows that:
- If I am telling the truth, then I was cleared by the ADHD cop last night.
- If I am not telling the truth, then the ADHD cop knows I am lying and can denounce me.
- I can see no reason for the cop to keep silent. With 7 players, 3 scum is unlikely, so denouncing a liar is a lock for the town.

Does anybody care to claim "ralphmerridew is lying. I'm the ADD cop and I wasn't retargeted onto him last night / I got a guilty result on him."?[/quote]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot



PostPosted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 1:22 am    Post subject: 114 Reply with quote

The clock stops its ticking at

24:00:00

It is remaining there for the time being. (It's purpose was to get some discussion of some sort going, which is has achieved. It will start up again only if it seems we are stalling out again.)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
lexprod
NOT not a title



PostPosted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 2:49 am    Post subject: 115 Reply with quote

ralphmerridew wrote:
Does anybody care to claim "ralphmerridew is lying. I'm the ADD cop and I wasn't retargeted onto him last night / I got a guilty result on him."?
[/quote]

ralphmerridew raises a good point, other than the fact that he is now cop-baiting as much as he claims scum would be trying to be. Only he is being overt about it. Best case scenario: a cop calls him on lying, we lynch him, he's the last scum, we dance. Worst case scenario: same thing except he's not the last scum and the cop gets killed tonight, leaving us with 2 town to 1 scum (or if whatever vig/sk gets another hit, who knows).

So I guess after DP posts next, I'll take a silence as a sign that rm is not lying about being investigated. Hopefully that means townie ralphmerridew, and not some other 3rd option (I hate third options).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos



PostPosted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 2:27 pm    Post subject: 116 Reply with quote

well in this case a third option is probably likely being chocolate mafia and all. I will tell you one thing I am surprised about, no bandwagons have developed today. That is leading me to believe we only have one scum left otherwise they could have jumped on me milkshake or rm. With only one left they have to be careful. hmm will have to think about this.
_________________
The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Dragon Phoenix
Judge Doom



PostPosted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 3:55 pm    Post subject: 117 Reply with quote

Well, it's good to see you post more than a one-liner ralphmerridew, and to see you had a plan behind that, even if it led you up the wrong tree.

Leaning towards lexprod now.
_________________
My photography:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/artrock2006/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
lexprod
NOT not a title



PostPosted: Wed Dec 02, 2009 5:08 pm    Post subject: 118 Reply with quote

Undercover Monk wrote:
I will tell you one thing I am surprised about, no bandwagons have developed today. That is leading me to believe we only have one scum left otherwise they could have jumped on me milkshake or rm.


You make a good point.

My freaking out over the raekuul post was because it could've been a good chance to make any scum start sweating if it was a real slip. The only thing it's done is DP's small twinge of reaction back at me, everyone else seems ready to ignore it. However if I turn out to be right about this two-scum-left thing, DP and UM are my first vote for being in cahoots. I cannot find a post in which they say anything bad about each other.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot



PostPosted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 5:23 pm    Post subject: 119 Reply with quote

hmmm. 24 hours without a post. The big clock on the wall flickers threateningly, but does not start counting just yet.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
ralphmerridew
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Thu Dec 03, 2009 5:37 pm    Post subject: 120 Reply with quote

@lexprod: IIUC, cop-baiting refers to mafia trying to get investigated by cops in a future night action. If so, I'm not cop-baiting; I'm claiming to have been investigated in a past night action.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
Display posts from previous: by   
Reply to topic    The Grey Labyrinth Forum Index -> Mafia Games All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Page 3 of 6

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Site Design by Wx3