The Grey Labyrinth is a collection of puzzles, riddles, mind games, paradoxes and other intellectually challenging diversions. Related topics: puzzle games, logic puzzles, lateral thinking puzzles, philosophy, mind benders, brain teasers, word problems, conundrums, 3d puzzles, spatial reasoning, intelligence tests, mathematical diversions, paradoxes, physics problems, reasoning, math, science.

   
The Grey Labyrinth Forum Index
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups    RegisterRegister  
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Israeli Blockade: Who didn't see this coming?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
 
Reply to topic    The Grey Labyrinth Forum Index -> Off-Topic
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Poisonium
annoyed by the old



PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 2:22 pm    Post subject: 41 Reply with quote

Oh my, I'm really tired today.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Samadhi
+1



PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 5:24 pm    Post subject: 42 Reply with quote

Israel inspected the stuff and gave it to Hamas who rejected it. Clearly symbology is more important than any suffering that may have been alleviated.
_________________
And he lived happily ever after. Except for the dieing at the end and the heartbreak in between.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
Samadhi
+1



PostPosted: Thu Jun 03, 2010 6:03 pm    Post subject: 43 Reply with quote

I think Lieberman says it quite well.

And Netanyahu's quip is quite good: "Israel is presumed guilty until proven guilty."
_________________
And he lived happily ever after. Except for the dieing at the end and the heartbreak in between.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
Samadhi
+1



PostPosted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 5:37 pm    Post subject: 44 Reply with quote



_________________
And he lived happily ever after. Except for the dieing at the end and the heartbreak in between.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
Jack_Ian
Big Endian



PostPosted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 6:51 pm    Post subject: 45 Reply with quote

Samadhi wrote:
Seriously. Suppose there were a slice of land in the US just below DC and above Maryland. Suppose the government living there swore to end the US, and was dedicated to killing all Americans. A flotilla is coming in that the US hasn't inspected.

Are you seriously telling me that you would be OK with that ship going uninspected?

Sorry, I was away. Still don't have a lot of time, but this does deserve a response.

If a foreign power was bent on my destruction and I had the power to do it, I would create a blockade and inspect all cargo entering. Then after inspection, I would let the aid through.
If instead, I decided to label aid as only that which was necessary in order to prevent starvation and blocked eggs, spices, meat, construction materials etc., then I would expect the International Community to rise up and condemn me for it.
If I knew that the U.S. would veto any sanction, I'd tell the international community to go f*%k themselves and continue oppressing as I saw fit.
Then I'd forge some passports from the countries that complained and assassinate anybody who dared to offer military resistance.
Then I'd give reports to the media, in perfect English, dressed impeccably and with plenty of sound bytes, knowing that it would be lapped up by U.S. media and let the weirdly dressed, obviously foreign and apparently uneducated (since they can't even speak English) peasants try to complain about their mistreatment. And then I'd laugh, knowing that they would never be taken seriously.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Samadhi
+1



PostPosted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 7:15 pm    Post subject: 46 Reply with quote

Quote:
If a foreign power was bent on my destruction and I had the power to do it, I would create a blockade and inspect all cargo entering. Then after inspection, I would let the aid through.
You could have stopped there.
_________________
And he lived happily ever after. Except for the dieing at the end and the heartbreak in between.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
Jack_Ian
Big Endian



PostPosted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 7:22 pm    Post subject: 47 Reply with quote

extro...* wrote:
One of the "aid" ships was named the "Rachel Corrie". Remember her?
Yes I do remember her. She was an American Peace Activist that was killed by an Israeli Bulldozer. I don't go along with the people that believe that she was intentionally killed. But I do believe that there was scant regard given to the life of those protesting against the barbaric act of bulldozing down people's homes. I consider her actions to be just as heroic as those of the students standing in front of the tanks in Tiananmen Square. She was involved in peaceful resistance and was willing to put herself in harms way to do it. Even if you don't agree with her political stance, she deserves respect for her actions.

There's another picture of her with an American Flag here, if you're interested.

And if you still think of her as just a statistic, perhaps seeing her talk will make her seem more human to you.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jack_Ian
Big Endian



PostPosted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 7:23 pm    Post subject: 48 Reply with quote

Samadhi wrote:
Quote:
I would let the aid through
I just thought I'd highlight the important bit.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jack_Ian
Big Endian



PostPosted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 7:32 pm    Post subject: 49 Reply with quote

Samadhi wrote:

Hilarious. Oh, Jiminy
People died, remember?
Excellent kill ratio though 9:0, even better than Gaza.
Who are the aggressors again?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Pablo
Never Draws a Blank



PostPosted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 7:39 pm    Post subject: 50 Reply with quote

Jack_Ian wrote:

And if you still think of her as just a statistic, perhaps seeing her talk will make her seem more human to you.


I listened, and she seems quite human. I certainly don't see how Americans can even take sides in this horrible situation. I don't see good vs. evil - all I see is hate vs hate and violence vs violence.

I thought the cartoons were in extremely poor taste as well.
_________________
All religions are the same - Guilt....just with different holidays.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Samadhi
+1



PostPosted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 9:19 pm    Post subject: 51 Reply with quote

Jack_Ian wrote:
Samadhi wrote:
Quote:
I would let the aid through
I just thought I'd highlight the important bit.
They tried to give the aid to them but Hamas turned it down.

And Israel is on the defense, not offense. Breaking a blockade is an aggressive act. And the 0 deaths among the SEALs certainly wasn't for lack of trying.
_________________
And he lived happily ever after. Except for the dieing at the end and the heartbreak in between.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
Samadhi
+1



PostPosted: Fri Jun 04, 2010 9:25 pm    Post subject: 52 Reply with quote

Poor taste? Why? Something inaccurate about them?
_________________
And he lived happily ever after. Except for the dieing at the end and the heartbreak in between.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
Antrax
ESL Student



PostPosted: Sat Jun 05, 2010 6:06 am    Post subject: 53 Reply with quote

If I understood correctly, Jack Ian, you're saying what I wrote doesn't deserve a response? Was it offensive or irrelevant in some way?
_________________
After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Death Mage
Raving Lunatic



PostPosted: Sat Jun 05, 2010 8:07 am    Post subject: 54 Reply with quote

Hamas refuses Flotilla aid.

Any useful idiots out there still think this Flotilla had any "humanitarian" intents?
_________________
* These senseless ramblings brought to you by Insanity™. If you just can't figure the dang thing out, it must be Insanity™.
[YOUR AD HERE!]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Samadhi
+1



PostPosted: Sat Jun 05, 2010 10:06 am    Post subject: 55 Reply with quote

June 3rd
Samadhi wrote:
Israel inspected the stuff and gave it to Hamas who rejected it. Clearly symbology is more important than any suffering that may have been alleviated.

Samadhi wrote:
Jack_Ian on June 4th..... wrote:
Samadhi wrote:
Quote:
I would let the aid through
I just thought I'd highlight the important bit.
They tried to give the aid to them but Hamas turned it down.

In case anyone missed it.
_________________
And he lived happily ever after. Except for the dieing at the end and the heartbreak in between.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
Samadhi
+1



PostPosted: Sat Jun 05, 2010 10:12 am    Post subject: 56 Reply with quote

I'm curious. DM, Antrax do you think those cartoons are in poor taste? Sorry to lump you two together, likely a philosophic anti-partical explosion will happen....
But I also ask again, why are they "in poor taste"?
_________________
And he lived happily ever after. Except for the dieing at the end and the heartbreak in between.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
Antrax
ESL Student



PostPosted: Sat Jun 05, 2010 10:26 am    Post subject: 57 Reply with quote

The second one assumes bad faith on the part of the Palestenians, who are not really a side in this issue, as funny as it sounds. The first one claims this is a racial issue, where it would have probably been more accurate to depict them as saying "death to Zionists", which is what Ahmadinejad says he's about, not Jews. I haven't really understood Pablo's comment about kill ratio with regard to the cartoons, so there may me more I am missing.
_________________
After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Samadhi
+1



PostPosted: Sat Jun 05, 2010 11:02 am    Post subject: 58 Reply with quote

I think the second one is quite accurate. That is the policy position of the three groups listed. There are some really despicable people over there but I would wager that a high majority of the people, 80% or so at least, irrespective of their views on Israel, desire peace so they can get on with life and raise a family. On this I don't think we disagree.

As for the second, nah. They were quoted on video about basically killing jews. There was a specific reference to a massacre of jews by muslims and that that was what they were bringing. I am too tired to look it up. These guys expected confrontation, they were armed for it. If they had done something Gandhi like at the salt factory (walk up to it and get beat in the head, rinse repeat) then any death would be damning to Israel and heroic to the Palestinians. But these guys were thugs. They died because they were thugs. I shed no tears for them.

Ahmadinijad...who knows. They want the bomb and want to be the hegemons of the middle east. He's a politician, so pragmatic, as opposed to the ridiculousness that is Hamas. The population of Iran, in general tbh, I don't think they care too much about Israel as much as they care about the oppression they're under. Even after 30 years they still are very western.
_________________
And he lived happily ever after. Except for the dieing at the end and the heartbreak in between.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
Pablo*
Guest



PostPosted: Sat Jun 05, 2010 6:04 pm    Post subject: 59 Reply with quote

Antrax wrote:
I haven't really understood Pablo's comment about kill ratio with regard to the cartoons,


Not my comment.
Back to top
extro...*
Guest



PostPosted: Sat Jun 05, 2010 9:37 pm    Post subject: 60 Reply with quote

Jack_Ian wrote:
There's another picture of her with an American Flag here, if you're interested.


Disgusting desecration of the flag, in my opinion.
Back to top
extro...*
Guest



PostPosted: Sat Jun 05, 2010 9:52 pm    Post subject: 61 Reply with quote

Pablo wrote:
I don't see good vs. evil - all I see is hate vs hate and violence vs violence.


We've been over this in the distant past, and have presented and explored a great volume of objective evidence, and it is quite clear that you see what you want to see. You start from a premise that it can't be that one side is right, the other wrong, and that you'll be a better person for having a "balanced viewpoint", no matter what the facts are, and so you filter the facts to allow yourself to maintain that viewpoint. It is utterly futile to try to show you facts. But if you contest that, I'll try again, just to prove it again to anyone who's forgotten. The bottom line is that one side wants to live in peace, the other side wants to die in battle.

I think it was Golda Meir who said words to the effect that there will be peace in the Middle East when the Palestinians love their children as much as they hate the Jews. I think this sums it up completely and precisely. All else is irrelevant.
Back to top
extro...*
Guest



PostPosted: Sat Jun 05, 2010 10:12 pm    Post subject: 62 Reply with quote

extro...* wrote:
Pablo wrote:
I don't see good vs. evil - all I see is hate vs hate and violence vs violence.


We've been over this in the distant past, ...


Specifically:

http://www.greylabyrinth.com/discussion/viewtopic.php?t=13141&postdays=0&postorder=asc&highlight=balanced&start=20

Further down in that thread:

Pablo wrote:
extropalopakettle wrote:
Pablo wrote:
Taking one side as righteous victims and the other as completely evil is rarely a path to the truth.


Seeking the truth with an implicit assumption that it must be something more balanced isn't any better.


Seeking the truth with an implicit assumption that it could be something more balanced is way better.


There's your problem right there - a belief that a certain kind of bias in seeking truth is a good thing. It's why you don't find truth. It's why you see what you see, and don't see what is. It's truly sad, because you have good intentions, but this stance of yours only perpetuates the violence. The Jews are not going to run into the sea for the sake of your balanced view. They will survive. Because of delusional, distorted "balanced viewpoints" like yours, they will have to defend themselves against women and children used as human bombs and human shields. This is your doing, Pablo. The sooner you know it, the less you'll regret in the end. Or maybe you'll never know.
Back to top
Death Mage
Raving Lunatic



PostPosted: Sat Jun 05, 2010 10:47 pm    Post subject: 63 Reply with quote

What about all the good things Stalin did?
_________________
* These senseless ramblings brought to you by Insanity™. If you just can't figure the dang thing out, it must be Insanity™.
[YOUR AD HERE!]
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tally*
Guest



PostPosted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 1:17 am    Post subject: 64 Reply with quote

Omigosh Extro. Everyone has an agenda. EVERYONE. Even you, even me. Accusing someone else of a delusional, distorted viewpoint because they don't see absolute good vs evil is laughable, frankly. It doesn't exist. Starting with balance and working from there is the only way to work through the muck that is PR. If you start fromn a point of view that one side is right and the other is wrong you will seek out whatever information you can to confirm your own belief and actively ignore evidence to the contrary. It's called 'cognitive bias' and is well-established fact that we all do it.
Back to top
extro...*
Guest



PostPosted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 2:09 am    Post subject: 65 Reply with quote

Tally* wrote:
Accusing someone else of a delusional, distorted viewpoint because they don't see absolute good vs evil is laughable, frankly.


That accusation wasn't made, but I must ask regarding that, in all situations, or just this one? For instance, Nazis versus Jews during the Holocaust? A "balanced viewpoint" regarding that (both sides equally to blame) ... would it be delusional and distorted? Or would it be laughable to suggest so?

Tally* wrote:
Starting with balance and working from there is the only way to work through the muck that is PR. If you start fromn a point of view that one side is right and the other is wrong you will seek out whatever information you can to confirm your own belief and actively ignore evidence to the contrary. It's called 'cognitive bias' and is well-established fact that we all do it.


Let's turn the tables. Let's take Nazi Germany versus the Jews. Start with a balanced viewpoint. Both sides are equally to blame. And proceed from there, examining whatever evidence there is, and in the end, retain your balanced viewpoint, because that's where you started, and that's where you believed you should stay. Then what's laughable?

I absolutely agree there's cognitive bias here. Read through the thread from over a year ago that I linked to. There's ample evidence, and cognitive bias is exactly what I've been talking about - exactly what causes some to not see that evidence. Pablo's (and other's) cognitive bias is towards a "balanced viewpoint", against the evidence. I don't know if there were people suffering the same bias about the time of the holocaust, but if there were, they would find a way to believe that the Jews who went to the gas chambers were as much to blame for their fate as the Nazis who sent them there. The facts regarding the present circumstances are readily available, and as I said over a year ago, to dispute they are the facts, well, you may as well dispute the holocaust ever happened. There are people who do, after all. Yes, it's all a Jewish conspiracy to them. All the mountains of evidence of Palestinian brainwashing and fabrication of incredible mind-boggling outright lies ... all that evidence could be Jewish trickery, just as the holocaust was fabricated by Jews (according to some). I mean, who could possibly believe that Palestinians would kill their own children to make Jews look bad. But facts are facts, and the evidence is there. But if reality is distasteful, or doesn't agree with the "balanced viewpoint", then don't look at the evidence, or just postulate that similar hideousness probably came from the other side too.

I can provide you with many examples of Israeli "propaganda" that promotes peace with their enemies, and with many examples of Palestinian propaganda (much directed at children) that promotes genocide and martyrdom for the cause of killing Jews, and I challenge anyone to find anything but insignificant (if anything at all) examples of the converse. One side wants to survive, the other side wants their children to martyr themselves destroying the Jews. The evidence is there, and what is laughable is to dismiss it because it doesn't agree with your idealistic notion that in any conflict, both sides must be equally to blame. If you doubt me, I'll spend the time to bury you in the evidence, and you can spend the time making claims that it's all false, which will be about as credible, at the end of the day, as the claims that the holocaust never happened.
Back to top
casinopete*
Guest



PostPosted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 2:10 am    Post subject: 66 Reply with quote

Tally, I think perhaps you didn't understand what extro was saying. He didn't claim there were absolute good or evil involved. He didn't advocate an assumption that one side is right. He was describing a bias he thinks is distorting Pablo's understanding of the situation.

Your "correction" that people are biased and that people seek information to confirm their own beliefs and avoid evidence to the contrary is EXACTLY WHAT EXTRO WAS POINTING OUT.

Well, except for the part about your saying it's called 'cognitive bias', because, in fact, it is not really called 'cognitive bias', because that's a catchall term for an extremely wide list of distortions that includes the much more accurate 'confirmation bias'.
Back to top
casinopete*
Guest



PostPosted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 2:12 am    Post subject: 67 Reply with quote

bugger all
Back to top
extro...*
Guest



PostPosted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 2:16 am    Post subject: 68 Reply with quote

Tally* wrote:
Everyone has an agenda. EVERYONE. Even you, even me.


So, please then elaborate on the agenda of the Jews of Germany during the Holocaust, for all our enlightenment. Perhaps contrast it with the agenda of the Nazis. And then, after that, tell me the point of mentioning that "everyone has an agenda".

Yes, today, the agenda of the Jews of Israel is survival, and the agenda of the so-called Palestinians (as a whole) is annihilation of the Jews. So what, if anything, is your point?
Back to top
Pablo
Never Draws a Blank



PostPosted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 2:30 am    Post subject: 69 Reply with quote

extro...* wrote:


Yes, today, the agenda of the Jews of Israel is survival, and the agenda of the so-called Palestinians (as a whole) is annihilation of the Jews. So what, if anything, is your point?


And I suppose the agenda of the U.S. is world peace.

I think a pretty good argument could be made that Israel's agenda is to keep the flow of money coming from the U.S.
_________________
All religions are the same - Guilt....just with different holidays.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Jack_Ian
Big Endian



PostPosted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 2:37 am    Post subject: 70 Reply with quote

Antrax wrote:
If I understood correctly, Jack Ian, you're saying what I wrote doesn't deserve a response? Was it offensive or irrelevant in some way?
Did I miss something? I thought I answered your question here.
Was there another question?

Death Mage wrote:
Hamas refuses Flotilla aid.

Any useful idiots out there still think this Flotilla had any "humanitarian" intents?
What does one have to do with the other?
Egypt, Israel AND Hamas all want the blockade to continue. This aid was for the people of Gaza. The intention of the activists on the ship was to break a blockade that they believed to be unjust. Whether Hamas chose to reject the aid until ALL the aid was allowed through, has no bearing on the original intention of the activists. Can you please explain your logic here.

extro...* wrote:
Jack_Ian wrote:
There's another picture of her with an American Flag here, if you're interested.
Disgusting desecration of the flag, in my opinion.
She was an american citizen. She was exercising her right to free speech. She engaged in peaceful resistance. She bravely stood up for a people that she believed to be oppressed. Isn't that the kind of behaviour that the American flag is supposed to represent?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Tally*
Guest



PostPosted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 3:00 am    Post subject: 71 Reply with quote

Extro I never said "equally to blame". I sure don't, and didn't, think both sides are equally to blame.
I said if you start with a strongly held belief, you will maintain or extend that belief. I think this thread, even this website is a good example. Does anyone ever change their opinions around here (given that they were strongly held ones) in spite of all the arguing?

casinopete I realise extro was trying to point out a bias, but I was trying to point out he should at least examine the one that's clouding his judgment first. Not an easy thing to do, admittedly. The 'confirmation bias' (as you rightly point out) usually occurs when the belief is strongly held and invested in. You usually don't see it when someone is trying to start from a balanced viewpoint.

I don't want to participate in unhelpful godwinning except to say that IMO the only balanced view of the Holocaust is that it was light years beyond despicable and has left a long dark shadow that is still continuing to fuck up our world today.

Also, slightly beside the point, but interesting - in 1947, Jews tried to break a British blockade of Palestine with a boatload of war refugees. When British soldiers boarded, they fought back and three were killed. International outrage ensued and world opinion swung in behind the Jews, and the state of Israel was established the next year.
Back to top
Jack_Ian
Big Endian



PostPosted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 3:09 am    Post subject: 72 Reply with quote

Pablo* wrote:
Antrax wrote:
I haven't really understood Pablo's comment about kill ratio with regard to the cartoons,
Not my comment.
That was my comment and it relates to these statistics.
I fully endorse the right of Israel to engage in military action in order to prevent the rocket attacks, but that does not mean that any military response can be justified. The amount of destruction and the devastation caused could in no way be considered a justifiable response. It's a basic moral principal. If somebody slaps you in the face, that doesn't give you the right to go home and get your gun to shoot them in response. There has to be balance.
In the case of the botched raid on the ship. I do not think that Israel shot first or anything like that. By all accounts, the soldiers expected little or no resistance. After all, for all their rhetoric about them being terrorist led, Israeli intelligence knew better. These were activists that were not expected to be violent and were unarmed (apart from make-shift weapons, which I agree could have inflicted terrible injuries). I believe that the soldiers showed restraint at first but once the shooting started, soldiers do what they are trained to do. Kill. It may be that some were killed unnecessarily, but since there will be no independent investigation, we will never know.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LordKinbote
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 3:20 am    Post subject: 73 Reply with quote

Jack_Ian wrote:
If somebody slaps you in the face, that doesn't give you the right to go home and get your gun to shoot them in response. There has to be balance..


The soldiers were not just slapped in the face, they were beaten with pipes by dozens of people. And saying they didn't have the right to "go home and get their gun" implies they were attacked, left, and then came back and shot the protesters out of some sort of revenge. You've completely perverted the situation by your analogy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jack_Ian
Big Endian



PostPosted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 3:33 am    Post subject: 74 Reply with quote

The main question here has been raised by me now already more than once but it has yet to be addressed by anyone.

Is a blockade justified? YES
Is THIS blockade justified? NO


I believe that a blockade is justified but not one of this character.
You can't get empty cans to allow farmers to create tomato paste, but you can import as much Israeli tins of tomato paste as you want.
How can this kind of nonsense be justified? How can Israel still say that this is purely a blockade to prevent the importation of arms?
The whole thing stinks to high heaven.
It's right that such a blockade should be broken and replaced with one that only seeks the prevention of the import of weapons instead.

Some info by Associates Press and again here.
Or the link I referred to in an earlier post here.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jack_Ian
Big Endian



PostPosted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 3:36 am    Post subject: 75 Reply with quote

LordKinbote wrote:
saying they didn't have the right to "go home and get their gun" implies they were attacked, left, and then came back and shot the protesters out of some sort of revenge. You've completely perverted the situation by your analogy.
I never said that.
That analogy was in the previous paragraph about the bombing of Gaza.
What I said about the raid was that the soldiers initially showed restraint.
In fact, I even indicated that I was open to the possibility that all of the kills were justified.
Did you even finish reading it before you posted?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
LordKinbote
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 3:54 am    Post subject: 76 Reply with quote

Jack_Ian wrote:
LordKinbote wrote:
saying they didn't have the right to "go home and get their gun" implies they were attacked, left, and then came back and shot the protesters out of some sort of revenge. You've completely perverted the situation by your analogy.
I never said that.
That analogy was in the previous paragraph about the bombing of Gaza.
What I said about the raid was that the soldiers initially showed restraint.
In fact, I even indicated that I was open to the possibility that all of the kills were justified.
Did you even finish reading it before you posted?


Of course I did. I took it as implication by juxtaposition. If you didn't mean to imply a connection at all, I apologize.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jack_Ian
Big Endian



PostPosted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 4:08 am    Post subject: 77 Reply with quote

Just to be clear. I have never said that the raid was wrong, just that it was wrong to do it in international waters. I even said that it was possibly legally sound in international waters but was still wrong tactically.
The actions of the activists in trying to repel what they considered to be illegal borders in international waters was just nuts. Soldiers are trained to kill, what did they expect? However, the failure was on the part of the Israelis IMO, because they were the professionals in this situation and they should have been better prepared to face such a response. Also, not waiting for the boat to enter a restricted area was a tactical error and ill-advised, to say the least.
I believe that the soldiers acted as expected while enforcing a blockade.
What I have disagreed with was the nature of this blockade and as such I supported the actions of these activists in attempting to break it in order to highlight this injustice.
I don't think any of the activists actually expected to ever reach Gaza directly. Rather they wanted to highlight the parts of their aid that were considered in contravention of the rules and hopefully bring pressure to bear on Israel to relax these restrictions and allow it through after inspection.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jack_Ian
Big Endian



PostPosted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 4:11 am    Post subject: 78 Reply with quote

LordKinbote wrote:
I took it as implication by juxtaposition. If you didn't mean to imply a connection at all, I apologize.
Accepted Revenge most foul!
In retrospect, I can see how you could make such a connection since the initial post related to the cartoon.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Antrax
ESL Student



PostPosted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 5:38 am    Post subject: 79 Reply with quote

Jack Ian, I'm referring to post 34.
Talitha wrote:
Does anyone ever change their opinions around here (given that they were strongly held ones) in spite of all the arguing?
I have, several times. In the good old days, discussions were well-cited and thought provoking.
Talitha wrote:
Also, slightly beside the point, but interesting - in 1947, Jews tried to break a British blockade of Palestine with a boatload of war refugees. When British soldiers boarded, they fought back and three were killed. International outrage ensued and world opinion swung in behind the Jews, and the state of Israel was established the next year
Yep. There are actually a lot more parallels than that. I fully support the Palestenians' right to get their own country. The problem is they seem to want more.

Jack Ian, are we debating cast lead now? (If not, I don't really get the relevance of the link.) You won't find me justifying it. Contrary to what you may expect, my own beliefs are not "Israel good, Arabs bad". However, I am having a difficult time understanding what exactly your position is - it seems to change from post to post. Now everyone's equally to blame for the blockade which is legitimate in itself, and Israel's only sin is refusing to cooperate with an external investigation into its internal affairs?
Jack Ian wrote:
How can this kind of nonsense be justified? How can Israel still say that this is purely a blockade to prevent the importation of arms?
The simple truth is that it's not. It used to be, until Gilad Shalit was kidnapped. Then, it my belief that my government extended to forbid a whole lot more in an attempt to collapse the Hamas regime. This is nothing official, but it's been well-cited enough by newspapers here and I've seen the response of politicians that I think it's true. And people wouldn't have stood for that if a certain Turkish leader hadn't found fit to unite everyone here in a frenzy of patriotism.
_________________
After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Samadhi
+1



PostPosted: Sun Jun 06, 2010 11:59 am    Post subject: 80 Reply with quote

Quote:
Does anyone ever change their opinions around here (given that they were strongly held ones) in spite of all the arguing?
I do. I know others do. Frankly I come here to test my opinions. It's a puzzle site. If my opinions aren't well thought out I expect to get corrected. And zomg I might make a better theory.
[Edit: Probably not. At best I'll fight a notion that is Canon but ?? and someone else will think of something genius that opens up other avenues.]
_________________
And he lived happily ever after. Except for the dieing at the end and the heartbreak in between.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous: by   
Reply to topic    The Grey Labyrinth Forum Index -> Off-Topic All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
Page 2 of 10

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Site Design by Wx3