|
|
|
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot
|
Posted: Thu Oct 14, 2010 11:43 am Post subject: 521 |
|
|
| Antrax wrote: |
| Thank you Zag, for this quality analysis. |
Thanks for the sarcasm. It's always appreciated.
I wouldn't have said anything if Mackay hadn't asked. She's gotten me afraid not to answer her questions. My point was that I really don't know, but if I had said, 'I don't know. I don't want to accuse anyone.' then you'd be accusing me for that, too.
Once again, I tried to state what I was thinking. I gave the reasons I was thinking it -- the biggest thing I'm thinking about right now is that IS is clearly scum, so I am focused on trying to interpret his actions.
I tried to make the point that I didn't think it all that strongly about anyone but IS. That was what I was trying to say by saying that I suspect everybody. You'll notice that I intentionally included everyone, just to show that I didn't really feel that strongly about anyone. Or did that point elude you?
I see how you're trying to accuse me of what I accused you of. Maybe you're right in that what you did before was just the same sort of uncertainty. But the big difference is that I was pressured to give this opinion. I would not have bothered to volunteer it, because I don't really think it has much substance. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot
|
Posted: Thu Oct 14, 2010 11:48 am Post subject: 522 |
|
|
| Oh yeah. I didn't say a whole lot about everybody and then vote for someone else. That's what I accused you of. ... just in case you forgot. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antrax
ESL Student
|
Posted: Thu Oct 14, 2010 11:58 am Post subject: 523 |
|
|
Oh, come on. Nobody asked you "hey, could you explain again what it means to be in lynch or lose? Oh, you're saying that if an innocent votes an innocent it's instant loss for the town? Thanks, I forgot".
| Quote: |
| I tried to make the point that I didn't think it all that strongly about anyone but IS. That was what I was trying to say by saying that I suspect everybody. You'll notice that I intentionally included everyone, just to show that I didn't really feel that strongly about anyone. Or did that point elude you? |
Hardly - I specifically commented about it, also when Alfie did it. Few things are less useful than stating "well, everyone who isn't me is suspect". It's just something to say so nobody can say you're not saying anything.
| Quote: |
| I see how you're trying to accuse me of what I accused you of. Maybe you're right in that what you did before was just the same sort of uncertainty. But the big difference is that I was pressured to give this opinion. I would not have bothered to volunteer it, because I don't really think it has much substance. |
So are you saying if I go over your past posts from before today, I will not find instances where you state several people are scummy and then vote for one of them? Or will I find that you voted for more than one person at the same time? _________________ After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Quailman
His Postmajesty
|
Posted: Thu Oct 14, 2010 12:42 pm Post subject: 524 |
|
|
I had to go to East Texas, the high-speed black hole of the universe, because my mother-in-law totaled her car. She's fine, even though she had to be pulled out through the window because the doors wouldn't open.
I see that you guys have added about three pages in my absence. I still have suspicions based on a quick skim, but I need to reread, and from a PC where I can take notes, not from this Ipad.
The dial-up doesn't even work at her home. It boots you out as soon as your home page loads. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mith
Pitbull of Truth
|
Posted: Thu Oct 14, 2010 1:54 pm Post subject: 525 |
|
|
Vote Count: 5 to lynch.
Internet Stranger: 3 (Zag, Alfie, Sofis)
Zag: 2 (Mackay, Elayne)
mole: 1 (Internet Stranger)
Not Voting: 3 (Antrax, Quailman, mole) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot
|
Posted: Thu Oct 14, 2010 2:25 pm Post subject: 526 |
|
|
| Antrax wrote: |
| Oh, come on. Nobody asked you "hey, could you explain again what it means to be in lynch or lose? Oh, you're saying that if an innocent votes an innocent it's instant loss for the town? Thanks, I forgot". |
Sorry, I didn't know the shorthand terminology for saying that. It is just a common problem that happens when someone comes to a new problem. He explains it without realizing that, of course, everyone he is talking to already understands it. And it's really obnoxious of you to piss on me for it.
| Antrax wrote: |
| Quote: |
| I see how you're trying to accuse me of what I accused you of. Maybe you're right in that what you did before was just the same sort of uncertainty. But the big difference is that I was pressured to give this opinion. I would not have bothered to volunteer it, because I don't really think it has much substance. |
So are you saying if I go over your past posts from before today, I will not find instances where you state several people are scummy and then vote for one of them? Or will I find that you voted for more than one person at the same time? |
Yes. I'm saying that you'll find that, if I voted for someone, I led with that information, and I made it clear that that person was my prime suspect. I might also have said that I suspect other people, but I have focused on the one I voted for and why I'm voted for him. In the note in question, you spent more words on everyone but DP, he was the last one you mentioned, and what you said about him didn't feel any stronger than what you said about anyone else.
Would you like the list?
I voted for Amb. I pointed to several things he said which I felt represented subtle manipulation. In hindsight, I think I overanalyzed it, but I was quite clear at the time.
I voted for Sofis because I thought a cop was indicating him.
I voted for IS, because he brought his scummy hammer.
Since you've been such a jerk about it, would you please review all the votes you've made, and give a line of why you made them? Thanks so much. Since I know that you've voted every single lynching, and they all were innocent, this should be illuminating. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Internet Stranger
Paragon of Mafia Hunters
|
Posted: Thu Oct 14, 2010 3:43 pm Post subject: 527 |
|
|
Does anyone not find it peculiar that the scum (Antrax & Mole) are in the not voting list? _________________ "I didn't know she was your sister I swear!"
www.InternetStranger.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Quailman
His Postmajesty
|
Posted: Thu Oct 14, 2010 4:49 pm Post subject: 528 |
|
|
Phew! I've read through today and reviewed the earlier days. I made notes, which I do not feel like editing, so grammar errors and all, here they are:
Alfie posted my thoughts on 10/12 about IS – He (IS) clearly looks the scummiest. Mole’s refutation of Alfie’s logic looks like he’s defending IS – same team?
Antrax, whom I’ve suspected all along is not voting yet – waiting for a bandwagon against an innocent? He’s unwilling to conclude IS’s scumminess, and wants to connect Elayne and Alfie while proclaiming Zag’s scumvibes the result of caution. Aha! After further consideration, Antrax is ready to vote Zag before IS, but still no vote.
| Antrax wrote: |
| I'm also waiting for Quailman or a deadline before I vote. |
Well, thank you for waiting. Sorry I couldn’t be here sooner.
| Antrax wrote: |
Now for "obvious math corner": based on the vote count, if there are four scum alive, then either:
a) IS and Zag are mafia, or
b) IS is innocent, mole, Zag, Alfie and Sofis are all mafia, or
b) Zag is innocent, Elayne and Mackay are mafia, and either mole or IS are mafia. |
Elayne thought both DP and Hy were scum, and now has to backtrack. I agreed with DP, though.
| Quote: |
| I bet there is at least one scum among Antrax, IS and Zag. |
I’m thinking at least two. Now Elayne is confident that IS is scum, and is voting her second scummiest Zag. What’s up with that?
Mackay seems convinced of Elayne’s scumminess. Only mildly suspicious of Antrax, sees mole as playing safe. Suspects Sofis most of all. Wow! Mackay has made a lot of posts! Leery of putting a third vote on anyone, she votes Elayne, while saying Elayne and IS are probably both scum.
| Mackay wrote: |
| You join the game mid-day-2 and post your scum-o-meter. When you get to nighttime, you discover that your scum buddies Elayne and IS don't have nearly the appreciation you expected for their being the only two people with a negative ranking. They say, "Hey Zaq, cut it out, that gives us away". You do. People notice. You retcon your story to explain away the inconsistency in your behaviour. |
I had noticed this myself. WFT! Could it be that easy? Mackay has changed to Zag.
| Mackay wrote: |
| Mostly, it's that I'm as sure as I can possibly be that Zag is mafia, and about 80% sure that Elayne is mafia. Zag/Elayne/IS seems like the most obvious grouping by far, with the plan for Zag to "prove his innocence" by throwing IS under the bus, but the possibility of Zag/Elayne/Antrax, while small IMO (let's not even think about Zag/Elayne/IS/Antrax) |
Right now I have Antrax ahead of Elayne, but otherwise I agree with this whole statement.
| mole wrote: |
| Question for Qman: What's your take on the three lynches? Do you agree with Antrax's take? |
I voted for FMB as a lurker on day 1 and he did nothing to change my mind. Antrax voted for him for not claiming. I was the first to vote amb the day he was lynched. Antrax followed quite a bit later for a similar reason. DP referred to me as one of his “main suspects” on day 3, after I had claimed on day 2. That told me he must be scum. Mole suspects IS and Zag, and he likes to camp as do I. He must be right.
| Sofis wrote: |
| IS actually calls attention to the low rating Zag gave him, several times. I think this contradicts the idea that Zag was downrating his scumbuddies and they told him to cut it out, as IS, at least, did not seem to mind. |
I disagree. I think he expects everyone to notice, and if called on it, he can regurgitate Zag’s reasoning, flawed as it may be. Sofis has posted less than I have. Laying low today?
Zag has posted even more than Mackay, but that’s partly because he’s at defcon 4. So many people think he’s scum, but at the same time he’s still attacking. Somewhere in there he accuses everyone. I can’t get a really good feel for whom he’s trying to distance himself from (other than the obvious IS). I am convinced that Zag is scum. I think he blew it with his scum-o-meter when he gave low ratings to Antrax, Elayne and IS. The only caveat I see is that he placed Sofis and CzarJ (now Mackay) higher up the list in order to set us up, and Mackay conveniently called him on this. I am more ready to lynch Zag than IS today.
| Internet Stranger wrote: |
| Does anyone not find it peculiar that the scum (Antrax & Mole) are in the not voting list? |
I always look at the not voting list. I am currently on it due to circumstances beyond my control. I am not sure about those two, but I have my suspicions.
I am ready to vote: Zag.
I think he needs to go before IS. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot
|
Posted: Thu Oct 14, 2010 8:16 pm Post subject: 529 |
|
|
Q, Two of your points against me rely on IS being scum for them to be relevant.
- How is it scummy to have rated IS low, if he isn't scum, also? And do you really think I'm that stupid?
- mole's accusation of me rests on the same assumption.
Only the quote you have from Antrax includes me but not IS, and you have said that you suspect him, too! Why would you listen to him, then?
I admit that I've done some stupid things to draw attention to myself. But do you really have a preponderance of guilt if you drop the assumption that IS is guilty? And if you need that assumption, why not take him first?
I'm not actually expecting this to save my skin, because when IS goes down and we know he is scum, all those arguments will be validated. And if, against all reason, he isn't scum, I supposed you'll all come after me, anyway. But at least it give me one more day to squirm (as Mackay likes to put it ).
I have yet to hear IS or anyone else explain any reason an innocent person would have hammered DP the way that IS did, beyond "That's just his style -- he's wacky." I can (and have) said why a scum would have done so. Even a wacky townie would have wanted to wait and see if there was anything to learn from him before stringing him up.
I can, at least, say that one of my beliefs has been confirmed. It is much harder to form a bandwagon on a guilty person than on an innocent one -- there are just too many scum non-votes you have to overcome when it is on a guilty person, whereas the bandwagon on an innocent can always count on half or more of the scum helping it grow. I'm sorry (Antrax) if I'm just stating something that is already obvious and understood by all you experienced players, but maybe you need to be reminded of it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mackay
Saviour of Spiders
|
Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 12:51 am Post subject: 530 |
|
|
| Just a minor correction, Qman - I have had the strongest pro-town feel about Sofis, not the strongest suspicion. I bet I threw it in the middle of a rambling sentence somewhere, so I imagine it's an easy mistake to make (I need more coffee before I go through this thread again, so I'm gonna just take your word for it). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Internet Stranger
Paragon of Mafia Hunters
|
Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 1:00 am Post subject: 531 |
|
|
I find it interesting that Zaq keeps harping on and on and on about me being guilty. But I know im innocent.
Im in the mood to drop the hammer on him too. But I wont, because Antrax and Mole are the scum. They are just sitting back and enjoying the show. _________________ "I didn't know she was your sister I swear!"
www.InternetStranger.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Elayne
*gets sappy with L'lanmal*
|
Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 1:39 am Post subject: 532 |
|
|
Quailman, good to see your post!
IS isn't and hasn't ever been on the top of my scum list. You might have gotten a couple of my posts confused. I posted in 452, that I still had Alfie infront of Zag but not by much. Hence why in post 471 I said I was fine voting for the second person on my list, Zag. Zag is now at the top of my list having cracked under pressure. IS is probably third on my list at the moment. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mackay
Saviour of Spiders
|
Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 1:57 am Post subject: 533 |
|
|
| Zag wrote: |
Q, Two of your points against me rely on IS being scum for them to be relevant.
- How is it scummy to have rated IS low, if he isn't scum, also? And do you really think I'm that stupid?
- mole's accusation of me rests on the same assumption. |
Nobody is saying that IS is innocent! You are not only scummier than he is, but lynching you is going to yield a huge amount of information. It is the better lynch.
(Frankly, in the extremely unlikely event that you turn out to be pro-town then it's the icing on the fmb/Amb/DP suicidal-townie crapcake and we deserve to lose. )
| Quote: |
| Only the quote you have from Antrax includes me but not IS, and you have said that you suspect him, too! Why would you listen to him, then? |
1) Suspicion of someone is very rarely black and white, it's a sliding scale. Suspecting someone doesn't mean you have to write off everything they say as a lie.
2) Scum don't need to lie ALL the time, and the best ones do it as rarely as possible.
3) Antrax is an excellent scum and would be making points that benefit the town whether he were mafia or town, especially if he saw that a fellow mafioso was doomed either way.
| Quote: |
| I admit that I've done some stupid things to draw attention to myself. But do you really have a preponderance of guilt if you drop the assumption that IS is guilty? And if you need that assumption, why not take him first? |
Yes, the death of the scum-o-meter on day 3 doesn't require the scum to be IS/Elayne/Antrax to have the mafia telling you to stop it. There are plenty of ways people could imagine your having given them away somehow, scum are like that. I happen to think that it is IS/Elayne/Antrax, though I wouldn't use the word "stupid" so much as "inexperienced". =) Also, you lied to the town.
| Quote: |
| I have yet to hear IS or anyone else explain any reason an innocent person would have hammered DP the way that IS did, beyond "That's just his style -- he's wacky." I can (and have) said why a scum would have done so. Even a wacky townie would have wanted to wait and see if there was anything to learn from him before stringing him up. |
At the risk of sounding repetitive: nobody is saying IS is innocent! You are scummier, etc etc.
| Quote: |
| I can, at least, say that one of my beliefs has been confirmed. It is much harder to form a bandwagon on a guilty person than on an innocent one -- there are just too many scum non-votes you have to overcome when it is on a guilty person, whereas the bandwagon on an innocent can always count on half or more of the scum helping it grow. I'm sorry (Antrax) if I'm just stating something that is already obvious and understood by all you experienced players, but maybe you need to be reminded of it. |
I so totally agree. It's been way harder getting even just 3 votes on you than on IS, and that's with you having openly admitted lying to the town!
* * * * *
One last thing - not related to the current conversation, but something that has been bugging me - I called you a liar while picking at inaccuracies/inconsistencies, and you agreed with me and made an excuse for lying (to "protect" IS). I accused you of having made a sudden turnaround between days 2 and 3 over IS' cophood. I was factually wrong, as I later discovered. Instead of pointing out that I was wrong, you made an excuse about how you decided after Amb's lynching, when you reviewed the conversation between IS and Amb - a fairly detailed explanation for something that isn't true, as you were tossing the IS-as-investigator idea around on day 2. (I know I said I'd let it slide, but it's been nagging at me more and more as I think about it!)
The implication, to me, is that you are playing like a person who is knowingly lying and is convinced enough that he has been lying that his first instinct is to make excuses for himself, rather than check facts or counter premises. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mole
Subterranean Member
|
Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 2:19 am Post subject: 534 |
|
|
| Zag wrote: |
Q, Two of your points against me rely on IS being scum for them to be relevant.
- How is it scummy to have rated IS low, if he isn't scum, also? And do you really think I'm that stupid?
- mole's accusation of me rests on the same assumption.
Only the quote you have from Antrax includes me but not IS, and you have said that you suspect him, too! Why would you listen to him, then?
I admit that I've done some stupid things to draw attention to myself. But do you really have a preponderance of guilt if you drop the assumption that IS is guilty? And if you need that assumption, why not take him first? |
Ok. If we take away the assumption that IS is scum, I still don't think your behaviour yesterday is consistent with your explanation for it.
If you thought IS was a cop and Sofis was scum, why didn't you try at all to get Sofis lynched? You claim that you were "supporting" IS because you thought he was a cop, but I don't see any support besides your solitary vote. You had heaps of analysis from Day 2 to use, you could have demanded some further information from him, you could have paid attention when he claimed... but you didn't do any of that.
This is something that has been brought up by Mackay and I a number of times since I asked for it yesterday, and I haven't got any answers. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Internet Stranger
Paragon of Mafia Hunters
|
Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 2:34 am Post subject: 535 |
|
|
I dont care how much of a jackass Zaq looks like. The scum are Antrax and Mole. _________________ "I didn't know she was your sister I swear!"
www.InternetStranger.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Elayne
*gets sappy with L'lanmal*
|
Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 3:43 am Post subject: 536 |
|
|
You know, in all of this wall of spam we have from Zag, have we even seen a hint of a role name claim? I started skimming his posts since he was repeating the same things again and again, but I don't think I missed one.
Granted we haven't asked for one and I can't see myself changing my mind, but Zag, if you are town, why not? You seem to have tried everything else. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antrax
ESL Student
|
Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 12:44 pm Post subject: 537 |
|
|
Was at a late bachelor's party. Will post later. Zag, please claim. _________________ After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot
|
Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 1:17 pm Post subject: 538 |
|
|
Well, thanks for calling it spam, to which I can only say, "suck it."
Sure, I'll claim, I am a vanilla townie. (Surprise! Even if I were scum I'd say that. I've never understood why claiming it convinces anyone.)
I don't think that there is anything to the names, but I do have some fear that the mafia, who know more names than the rest of us, might be able to get something from them. But I'm vanilla, anyway, so there's nothing interesting to be gotten from mine.
I am Murray, and my flavor text talks about me being second only to The Minotaur on the list of heroes, even though someone else wrote his name (in crayon) above us both.
Oh, and my win condition was just like what Chaz said, you know, the same text that appears in one of the first few posts in the thread. I'm sure that's very convincing.
Antrax, I'm still waiting for your post describing every vote you've made and why you made it, like the one I made above. Elayne, since you're asking stuff of me, it's only fair that you make one, too.
I'm not sure what other hoops you want me to jump through to convince you. I don't care much anymore, because I know I can't -- you've made up your minds and nothing I say can convince you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Internet Stranger
Paragon of Mafia Hunters
|
Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 2:11 pm Post subject: 539 |
|
|
I think its unlikely that he could have made up the name for Murray.
Can we lynch Antrax and Mole now? _________________ "I didn't know she was your sister I swear!"
www.InternetStranger.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mole
Subterranean Member
|
Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 2:32 pm Post subject: 540 |
|
|
My vote will be going to Zag.
Any questions (from townies, not scum)? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Alfie
Bovine Member
|
Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 3:41 pm Post subject: 541 |
|
|
In the style of mith:
Vote Count: 5 to lynch.
Internet Stranger: 3 (Zag, Alfie, Sofis)
Zag: 3 (4) (Mackay, Elayne, Quailman, mole)
mole: 1 (Internet Stranger)
Not Voting: 1 (Antrax)
Italics are for those not bold voting, but who have stated their intentions.
I think I also agree with Elayne, I'll be satisfied with a Zag vote. I'm not sure he's my #2 (a slot currently occupied by Sofis), and I still don't think its the best play for the town (bird in the hand and all that). Once the day has run long, I'll move my vote to Zag if he still has a majority. But I'm not risking a clipped day by moving my bold vote. Whoever we do lynch, I want them to have plenty of time to post stuff we can analyze when they're gone.
But since it bears repeating, Sofis is flying under the radar and IS is wearing a sandwich board that says, "IM SKUM, LINCH ME UP!" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antrax
ESL Student
|
Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 4:23 pm Post subject: 542 |
|
|
Zag's claim is too elaborate. It does fit well with previously known roles, but a) it would've been easy to forge it and b) if he's really a townie then it becomes even less likely there are four scum.
I don't really see any point in continuing my discussion with him if he's scum. If amazingly, he's not, I'll be willing to answer his questions posthumously tomorrow, if I make it through the night.
I see no reason not to vote at this point. Everyone have spoken, and if there really are four scum, they must be IS, Quailman, Elayne and Mackay, which is an unlikely (and frightening) situation. So if I just threw the game, my hat's off to you, but I am going to vote: Zag. _________________ After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mackay
Saviour of Spiders
|
Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 5:06 pm Post subject: 543 |
|
|
I disagree, Ant - I think "Murray" was probably a safe rolename given to the scum. If Zag were to pick a random name off the memberlist to slap next to "vanilla townie", I don't think he'd pick something as prominent as #3, so I don't think he "forged" his own rolename per se.
Alfie, what is it that makes you think Sofis is as suspicious as/more suspicious than Zag? If I were to pick an "under-the-radar" guy it would probably be Quail.
I am not moving my vote, surprisingly enough.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Quailman
His Postmajesty
|
Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 5:27 pm Post subject: 544 |
|
|
| Elayne wrote: |
Quailman, good to see your post!
IS isn't and hasn't ever been on the top of my scum list. You might have gotten a couple of my posts confused. I posted in 452, that I still had Alfie infront of Zag but not by much. Hence why in post 471 I said I was fine voting for the second person on my list, Zag. Zag is now at the top of my list having cracked under pressure. IS is probably third on my list at the moment. |
Sorry about the confusion. IS was at the top of mine starting the day. A lot of people have him high in their lists. When you said Zag was number two, I inserted IS in error.
One thing I mentioned in my earlier post that I want to bring up again relates to Zag's scum-o-meter. Mackay (I think) summarized several versions of the list, with an early one marked up to show several proven innocents dead at the top of his suspicion list, and two still-alive people at the bottom. He changed it around the next day. After we lynch Zag today (and find him to be scum), it would be easy to assume that the two people he had in negative numbers are his cohorts. Let's not jump to conclusions. Mackay herself was one of the most suspicious if not the most suspicious on that list, of the people remaining alive. She spent quite a lot of time analyzing his scum-o-meter. The whole thing could be a mafia ploy to get us to bite after we lynch Zag and go after the two he placed at the bottom. We need to go back and read in context his reasoning at the time for placing people where he did. It looks awfully convenient that the people at the top of his list are all dead. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot
|
Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 5:51 pm Post subject: 545 |
|
|
Once again, you should pay attention. The day is done, and you shouldn't be posting. Bye all. Well done, Town, you finally bagged one.
Someday I'll learn how to play this game. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Quailman
His Postmajesty
|
Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 5:58 pm Post subject: 546 |
|
|
Thanks for clearing that up. Antrax is the fourth vote. Mole merely indicated an intent to vote for you, which is non-binding according to the official rules.
Whether or not Murray was his real role, I remember him well. He was a fact-checker. He left that to become a HS Spanish teacher in NYC. I wonder what he's up to now. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mackay
Saviour of Spiders
|
Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 5:59 pm Post subject: 547 |
|
|
| Actually, you're only at 4 (assuming mith's vote count at the top of the page is correct) - mole hasn't actually placed a vote yet. But I imagine it won't be long now. =) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sofis
Beautiful and Decadent
|
Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 6:01 pm Post subject: 548 |
|
|
Right then, let's go sleep.
Vote: Zag |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot
|
Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 6:13 pm Post subject: 549 |
|
|
| lol. reading comprehension not so good. Anyway, good bye. Good luck, Mafia!! Kill those sickening townies. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mith
Pitbull of Truth
|
Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 9:48 pm Post subject: 550 |
|
|
Final Vote Count: 5 to lynch.
Zag: 5 (Mackay, Elayne, Quailman, Antrax, Sofis)
Internet Stranger: 2 (Zag, Alfie)
mole: 1 (Internet Stranger)
Not Voting: 3 (mole) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mith
Pitbull of Truth
|
Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 10:01 pm Post subject: 551 |
|
|
"Hey, check this out..."
One of the GLers is looking at a wallet, fished out of the recently deceased's pocket.
"He was telling the truth. He really was Murray."
"But... why would Murray join the Mafia?"
"I heard rumors... that he saw things... deep in the labyrinth, that few others discovered... maybe something happened to him then. No one had heard from him in a while until this little convention, right?"
"Oh, look, there's something under his official GL idenfitication..."
The card reads:
K.A.K.A.P.O.
"What does that stand for?"
"I dunno. Killers... Assassins... uh... what's another K?"
"Knaves?"
"Knaves, yeah! Hey, you aren't a member too, are you?"
"Er... I'm just guessing. It's probably not Knaves."
Later, unfortunately, no one can remember who correctly suggested "Knaves".
"Let's see... the second A could just be And... Puzzlers?"
"Puzzlethusiasts!"
Once again, no one is sure later who actually suggested this correction.
"And the O could be Organization. Killers, Assassins, Knaves, And Puzzlethusiasts Organization?"
"What a silly acronym."
----
Zag (Murray, K.A.K.A.P.O.) has been lynched! It is Night 4. Deadline for night choices is 72 hours from this post.
Last edited by mith on Mon Oct 18, 2010 4:18 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mith
Pitbull of Truth
|
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 4:10 pm Post subject: 552 |
|
|
Somber organ music plays in the chapel, setting the mood for the wake K.A.K.A.P.O.'s latest victim. The seven GLers are hanging back, waiting for the chapel to clear so they can approach the body and look for clues to his identity. This is taking longer than they had anticipated, as the room is full of female mourners, each in turn taking her time paying her respects before leaning over and... well, the GLers can't quite figure out what's going on. Curiosity finally gets the better of them, and they inch forward to get a better look.
The next mourner - later identified as "Nate's Mom" - approaches the departed and, unable to control her emotions, throws herself at the corpse and... licks his face?
Light bulbs metaphorically appear over the heads of the GLers. Satisfied that they have identified the body, they leave the chapel to get on with avenging his death.
----
Antrax (AcidFast, Innocent; bodyguard) has been murdered. It is Day 5. With 7 alive, it will take 4 to lynch before deadline, which is two weeks from this post. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Internet Stranger
Paragon of Mafia Hunters
|
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 5:17 pm Post subject: 553 |
|
|
This makes no sense. Why kill Antrax? All that does is implicate Elayne now. Which is too obvious.
It would be so funny if it was Sofis after all.
Vote: Sofis _________________ "I didn't know she was your sister I swear!"
www.InternetStranger.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mackay
Saviour of Spiders
|
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 10:59 pm Post subject: 554 |
|
|
RIP Ant.
vote: IS. I was reluctant yesterday because I think that IS generally acts like a scum in every game, so while his hammer on DP was enough against almost anyone else, how should I know whether I can even apply that to IS? But he decisively showed his hand yesterday while defending Zag, and now I'm perfectly comfortable with an IS lynch, instead of only like 80% comfortable.
Quail, your logic against me from yesterday is a bit of a stretch. In a situation where Zag and I are scum together, why should I resist the ISwagon? If IS is scum with us too, well, I was planning to lynch a scumbuddy anyway. If he's town, bonus! (He's totally not town.) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Internet Stranger
Paragon of Mafia Hunters
|
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 11:36 pm Post subject: 555 |
|
|
(Im so totally town) _________________ "I didn't know she was your sister I swear!"
www.InternetStranger.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mackay
Saviour of Spiders
|
Posted: Mon Oct 18, 2010 11:48 pm Post subject: 556 |
|
|
So anyway, I did not expect Zag's nameclaim to actually be true. It's a shame we didn't get to see more reactions to it, but I don't blame Sofis for hammering someone who had openly admitted being mafia! In any case, IS having been all "He couldn't have made that name up. welp, case closed!" makes today an easy decision, though we should probably discuss everything we need to before stringing him up. I'll unvote if y'all want me to, but I had to at least slap it on there as a matter of principle.
We now know that the mafia are not necessarily players from the first game. I guess this doesn't rule them out completely, but it weakens my main argument against Elayne, who reacted to Amb's claim like a person who had knowledge that there was an existing "Sofis" role. Also, Antrax had already overtaken her on my own personal scum-o-meter yesterday, I was going to make an argument for lynching him after IS. Regardless, I don't actually think it will be that difficult for the town henceforth. We've gotten a LOT of information from this last game day, and the evidence mostly points at a relatively small subset of the players.
Time to stare at Zag's posts some more, I guess. =(
*preview* Oh hey, IS posted! *scorpion deathlock* |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Elayne
*gets sappy with L'lanmal*
|
Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2010 12:32 am Post subject: 557 |
|
|
IS, why back to Sofis? What happened to mole? Also, did you even consider the fact that since Antrax was a bodyguard, he might not have been the target? Maybe you knew he was the target and that's why you didn't consider it? Or did you know he wasn't the target and you were trying to keep us from figuring out who you were really trying to kill?
You've moved up to #1 on my scum list.
Vote: IS |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mole
Subterranean Member
|
Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2010 2:39 am Post subject: 558 |
|
|
| Mackay wrote: |
| So anyway, I did not expect Zag's nameclaim to actually be true. It's a shame we didn't get to see more reactions to it, but I don't blame Sofis for hammering someone who had openly admitted being mafia! In any case, IS having been all "He couldn't have made that name up. welp, case closed!" makes today an easy decision, though we should probably discuss everything we need to before stringing him up. I'll unvote if y'all want me to, but I had to at least slap it on there as a matter of principle. |
Well, everyone except Elayne got a post in after Zag's claim, but, yeah, there weren't too many reactions about it. IS did reveal himself to be scum though -- that post cleared up all the doubts I had too.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Internet Stranger
Paragon of Mafia Hunters
|
Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2010 4:02 am Post subject: 559 |
|
|
Bodyguard didnt even register to me until you mentioned it. I guess he did protect somebody.
I really thought that Zaq was just an overzealous idiot.
I figure Mackay has to be innocent. Setting up Zaq at this point could work though.
So if I was wrong about Antrax, I guess im wrong about Mole too.
If Elayne was scum, she wouldnt have pointed out that Antrax was protecting someone to me.
That leaves Alfie, Quail and Sofis.
Any of those 3 could be scum.
Alfie was just as ravenous as Zaq.
Quail is probably still playing with boys.
Zaq tried to clear Sofis early on by loosely voting for him.
So im going with Sofis.
Im innocent. Thats all there is too it. I think youre all just overeager townies, waving pitchforks and torches and doing all the work for the scum. _________________ "I didn't know she was your sister I swear!"
www.InternetStranger.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Internet Stranger
Paragon of Mafia Hunters
|
Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2010 4:04 am Post subject: 560 |
|
|
Oh and did you forget how badly Zaq wanted me lynched along with his pal, Alfie? There is no way he was that animated and faking it at the same time.
Im clearly innocent. _________________ "I didn't know she was your sister I swear!"
www.InternetStranger.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|