| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Samadhi
+1
|
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 11:46 pm Post subject: 1 |
|
|
Sad news. Six dead including a 9 year old girl and Rep. Giffords shot through the head and holding on for life. But some very heroic stories. Like the 3 people who subdued him, the intern who rushed in (instead of running) to tend to Giffords' wounds, Giffords' aide who (while shot himself) told that same intern "Stay with Gabby, stay with Gabby."
Unfortunately the rhetoric is already spinning up about "a vitriolic political discourse" and the fingers are pointing, naturally, at the right wing. Also, Arizona is a concealed carry state so that's coming up. Never mind that two of the guy's favorite books were The Communist Manifesto and Mein Kampf. Rand Paul read this guy's writings and his opinion (in an interview) is that the guy is paranoid schizophrenic. This makes the shooter irrelevant to the discussion, he's a nut. We could have been having beer summits and glad handing each other in all our discussion and having group hugs; this guy still would have killed. People will still try to make political hay of this. _________________ And he lived happily ever after. Except for the dieing at the end and the heartbreak in between.
Last edited by Samadhi on Sun Jan 09, 2011 11:52 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lexprod
NOT not a title
|
Posted: Sun Jan 09, 2011 11:49 pm Post subject: 2 |
|
|
This is a really sad moment, and again the news has to try to make sense of it so they latch onto the latest trend. In this case it's the crazy political atmosphere of the US, like we're all at odds with each other 24/7 and two steps away from violent action. Before this it was Islam, Video Games, and Rock N Roll. Here's hoping most people have better sense than to blame any political party for the acts of a madman. _________________ I'll have a P please... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Death Mage
Raving Lunatic
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 12:11 am Post subject: 3 |
|
|
This is all becuase of tea parties! Damn those little girls and their imaginary friends! Damn Toy Story and Mrs. Nesbit! This tragedy would never have happened without you!!
Ok, seriously, it's a shame those who were injured and died (including a high-ranking Arizona judge). It's easy to quickly say "Well, a Democrat was shot (not that you'd know that reading CNN, as usually they didn't actually identify the party for the democrat), so it must be the evil right wing conspiracy that did it!" Problem is, much like the "Microsoft Flight Simulator trained the 9/11 pilots" early knee-emphasis-on-JERK reaction, it falls apart when the truth is revealed.
This guy is the one behind the shootings. He's not right-wing, or left-wing, he's bat-shit-insane wing. Maybe he latched onto a message, but he would have latched onto any were that the case.
We live in the disinformation age. Take all news you hear with a grain of salt, and look for answers yourself. That includes this post, don't take my word for it, look at the available information yourself. _________________ * These senseless ramblings brought to you by Insanity™. If you just can't figure the dang thing out, it must be Insanity™.
[YOUR AD HERE!] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pablo
Never Draws a Blank
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 12:14 am Post subject: 4 |
|
|
Here's what I don't understand. Every day, I see bumper stickers that say "Support our Troops". I never see one that says "Support our Congressmen". Yet, every day a soldier dies and no one seems to give a shit. But when one congressperson gets shot, the prayers, sympathies, and tears flow like water, and the media salivates and devotes ALL their resources.
WTF? Why is her life more important or more valuable than that of ANY lowly soldier? _________________ All religions are the same - Guilt....just with different holidays. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Samadhi
+1
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 12:26 am Post subject: 5 |
|
|
In a terrible bit of irony, when Giffords turn to read the Constitution came, she read the First Amendment.
| First Amendment wrote: |
| Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. |
_________________ And he lived happily ever after. Except for the dieing at the end and the heartbreak in between. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Samadhi
+1
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 12:41 am Post subject: 6 |
|
|
Pablo: I think it's because soldiers go to war. In foreign lands against people who want to kill us. This was at a shopping center. I don't at all mean to mitigate the loss and sacrifice of our soldiers but it's expected. We get inured to it. Maybe you're right and we shouldn't be. But they go in knowing and accepting, believing they are protecting the rest of us (let's *not* get talking about that, we have another thread for that).
But this hits hard because anyone in the US could have been in that situation. You could have gone shopping and seen your Representative over yonder and thought "Oh, I guess I'll go over and [thank her/give her a piece of my mind]". Then suddenly some maniac starts shooting everyone. That's why everyone is horrified. _________________ And he lived happily ever after. Except for the dieing at the end and the heartbreak in between. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Samadhi
+1
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 12:43 am Post subject: 7 |
|
|
I don't know if this is irony or what but, the 9 year old (how sick do you have to be to deliberately shoot a beautiful 9 year girl? There's a special place in hell for this guy) was born on 9/11/01. _________________ And he lived happily ever after. Except for the dieing at the end and the heartbreak in between. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Thok*
Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 12:53 am Post subject: 8 |
|
|
| Samadhi wrote: |
| I don't know if this is irony or what but, the 9 year old (how sick do you have to be to deliberately shoot a beautiful 9 year girl? There's a special place in hell for this guy) was born on 9/11/01. |
No, that's the terrible bit of irony.
I agree that short of his parent locking up in an insane asylum there's not much that could have stopped this. (Although apparently Pima Community College did want him to go in for mental health evaluation.) What little I've seen of his myspace/youtube stuff makes me think he has serious problems with both English and logic.
I don't really want to say anything about this that might be seen as political until we actually have facts; the news media has been inconsistent about reporting the story (for example early on Giffords was being reported as deceased, and I've seen at least four different stories about what his motivations could be.) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 12:55 am Post subject: 9 |
|
|
I have to agree. I hate the new culture of "shout down your opponents" and "vote no on everything" and "refuse to discuss or compromise," but I don't blame the actions of a madman on it. I don't even blame Sarah Palin's crosshair targeting of Rep. Giffords; no reasonable person could have thought it was meant literally.
----
Samadhi, I'm curious about your new sig, "Praise Boehner! The first colored Speaker of the House. It makes me want to cry." The first colored President didn't seem to have that affect. Am I not understanding your message? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Samadhi
+1
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 1:11 am Post subject: 10 |
|
|
I'm poking fun at Boehner's tan and his tendency to cry. _________________ And he lived happily ever after. Except for the dieing at the end and the heartbreak in between. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 1:32 am Post subject: 11 |
|
|
| Oh, sorry. ~slaps forehead~ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pablo
Never Draws a Blank
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 1:40 am Post subject: 12 |
|
|
| Samadhi wrote: |
| I don't at all mean to mitigate the loss and sacrifice of our soldiers but it's expected. We get inured to it. Maybe you're right and we shouldn't be. |
I'm not inured to it. Consequently, It's not easy for me to understand how others are, especially those old enough to remember Viet Nam. (Perhaps if I were even older than I am, I would be citing WWII instead.) _________________ All religions are the same - Guilt....just with different holidays. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Samadhi
+1
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 1:54 am Post subject: 13 |
|
|
The media will probably use the fact that he liked The Communist Manifesto and Mein Kampf as evidence that he was just way out there where (as I've already heard said) "the extreme right meet the extreme left." Or they'll ignore that and focus on the fact that she was a Democrat that voted for the Affordable Care act.
If they focus on the former that will annoy me. A: He's crazy. B: Both those books are socialist aka left, not right at all.
If they focus on the latter, it's ridiculous. She used to be a Repulican and there were heavy signs she would vote for repeal.
| Quote: |
| I hate the new culture of "shout down your opponents" and "vote no on everything" and "refuse to discuss or compromise," |
This is a standard trope that also annoys me. It's *not* new. We were probably doing this before we learned how to make fire. Have you read some of the political outings of Jefferson or Hamilton against their opponents? Some are really bad, even in today's light. Do you think they didn't do the same in Greece? Caves? I just marvel that some people think there was some time when people who really disagreed with each other would never do that, instead they'd have a cup of tea, talk it out and be quite civil. Instead of having a war. Oh yes, how I look back upon the days of civility. _________________ And he lived happily ever after. Except for the dieing at the end and the heartbreak in between. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Samadhi
+1
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 2:07 am Post subject: 14 |
|
|
| Pablo wrote: |
| Samadhi wrote: |
| I don't at all mean to mitigate the loss and sacrifice of our soldiers but it's expected. We get inured to it. Maybe you're right and we shouldn't be. |
I'm not inured to it. Consequently, It's not easy for me to understand how others are, especially those old enough to remember Viet Nam. (Perhaps if I were even older than I am, I would be citing WWII instead.) |
I know that Pablo. I believe it's why you disagree with me a lot on some things because it's almost like you feel the pain of each loss. But that is a tangent. _________________ And he lived happily ever after. Except for the dieing at the end and the heartbreak in between. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Thok*
Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 2:18 am Post subject: 15 |
|
|
| Samadhi wrote: |
| If they focus on the former that will annoy me. A: He's crazy. B: Both those books are socialist aka left, not right at all. |
His list of favorite books also includes We the Living, aka Ayn Rand's first book and one of his pet causes was hard currency.
(In general, the reading list from the supposed myspace page suggests that he liked political allegory coming from any source and also liked fantastic children tales like Peter Pan, Phantom Toll Booth, and Alice in Wonderland.)
Honestly, if we're looking for a motive, his comments about grammar and English strike me as the common thread that might lead to something. Or we could let the investigators do their job, since they have more facts than us. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 5:33 am Post subject: 16 |
|
|
| Sorry, I didn't see that he made comments about grammar. What were they? (Also, it should be, "...they have more facts than we.") |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Death Mage
Raving Lunatic
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 9:26 am Post subject: 17 |
|
|
| Zag wrote: |
| I have to agree. I hate the new culture of "shout down your opponents" and "vote no on everything" and "refuse to discuss or compromise," |
It's cute that you think this is new. _________________ * These senseless ramblings brought to you by Insanity™. If you just can't figure the dang thing out, it must be Insanity™.
[YOUR AD HERE!] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Thok*
Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 11:11 am Post subject: 18 |
|
|
| Zag wrote: |
| Sorry, I didn't see that he made comments about grammar. What were they? (Also, it should be, "...they have more facts than we.") |
Grammar isn't the right term, honestly. But one of Loughner big buttons seems to be that language is meaningless and a government conspiracy.
I think we can agree that neither the left nor the right want to get rid of language as a concept. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 12:52 pm Post subject: 19 |
|
|
| Death Mage wrote: |
It's cute that you think this is new. |
It's cute how you seem to think that ad hominem attacks, especially those with a pedantic air, somehow win you debating points. As easy as it would be to reply in kind, I won't bother to stoop.
Edit: I have to apologize for originally including Samadhi, but that was unfair. While he called the comments "trope" (is that the past tense of tripe?) he did not make any sort of personal attack.
So I'm glad to respond to Samadhi. While it's true that, for instance, the Tea Party's strategy of swamping the "Town Meetings" and just shouting them down was not a new idea, it was the first time that such a policy was organized on such a large scale. Democracy requires public discourse, which can't happen without the discourse part. Supporting a party with a stated policy of "Prevent any discourse, just vote the way we tell you to," does not seem, to me, to be supporting democracy.
Last edited by Zag on Mon Jan 10, 2011 1:22 pm; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antrax
ESL Student
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 12:54 pm Post subject: 20 |
|
|
~awards Zag 2 debating points for being the bigger man~ _________________ After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pablo
Never Draws a Blank
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 1:43 pm Post subject: 21 |
|
|
| Samadhi wrote: |
| Pablo wrote: |
| Samadhi wrote: |
| I don't at all mean to mitigate the loss and sacrifice of our soldiers but it's expected. We get inured to it. Maybe you're right and we shouldn't be. |
I'm not inured to it. Consequently, It's not easy for me to understand how others are, especially those old enough to remember Viet Nam. (Perhaps if I were even older than I am, I would be citing WWII instead.) |
I know that Pablo. I believe it's why you disagree with me a lot on some things because it's almost like you feel the pain of each loss. But that is a tangent. |
Sadly, it is. But I can't help but wonder if we all wouldn't be better off if it were not. What if everyone felt the pain of each loss? _________________ All religions are the same - Guilt....just with different holidays. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pablo
Never Draws a Blank
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 1:45 pm Post subject: 22 |
|
|
| Zag wrote: |
| Death Mage wrote: |
It's cute that you think this is new. |
It's cute how you seem to think that ad hominem attacks, especially those with a pedantic air, somehow win you debating points. As easy as it would be to reply in kind, I won't bother to stoop.
|
OK, explain to me how that is NOT replying in kind. _________________ All religions are the same - Guilt....just with different holidays. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Death Mage
Raving Lunatic
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 2:31 pm Post subject: 23 |
|
|
It's OK, Pablio. I don't expect anything more from Zag. Samadhi had already posted some examples - including, effectively, all of human history - and Zag turned around criticized a word he'd never heard before, instead of trying to look it up. I've just learned that it's not worth talking to someone who's that blindly ignorant. Sure, you could cite the civil rights movement in the US, the entirety of the US Civil War, history lessons on how the senate was conducted in ancient Rome etc. It'll all wash over someone who's already made up their mind that this new, horrible, evil tactic that <insert group they disagree with here> has come up with, so why bother? _________________ * These senseless ramblings brought to you by Insanity™. If you just can't figure the dang thing out, it must be Insanity™.
[YOUR AD HERE!] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chaz
Vote: Zag
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 2:39 pm Post subject: 24 |
|
|
I blame government intervention. _________________ The enemy's base is down. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pablo
Never Draws a Blank
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 2:44 pm Post subject: 25 |
|
|
| Chaz wrote: |
| I blame government intervention. |
I fear I'm losing my title of "GL regular who hates government most". _________________ All religions are the same - Guilt....just with different holidays. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 3:17 pm Post subject: 26 |
|
|
Ha ha! You lost it a long time ago.
What worries me is thinking that Chaz believes what he said. But no, I'll assume he was joking, and with that assumption, it was pretty funny. Well done, Chaz (I hope). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pablo
Never Draws a Blank
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 4:26 pm Post subject: 27 |
|
|
| Zag wrote: |
Ha ha! You lost it a long time ago.
What worries me is thinking that Chaz believes what he said. But no, I'll assume he was joking, and with that assumption, it was pretty funny. Well done, Chaz (I hope). |
I don't know..... I think he is serious. _________________ All religions are the same - Guilt....just with different holidays. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Death Mage
Raving Lunatic
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 4:57 pm Post subject: 28 |
|
|
| Zag wrote: |
| Supporting a party with a stated policy of "Prevent any discourse, just vote the way we tell you to," does not seem, to me, to be supporting democracy. |
I mean, really, does anyone actually need to SAY how stupid this line is to realize that Zag has no clue? Maybe Zag just doesn't understand the word "democracy" any more than "trope". _________________ * These senseless ramblings brought to you by Insanity™. If you just can't figure the dang thing out, it must be Insanity™.
[YOUR AD HERE!] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chaz
Vote: Zag
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 5:08 pm Post subject: 29 |
|
|
I didn't say which government intervention I was blaming; clearly, this was the fault of the Nazis and Communists.
However, yes, it was meant more in the spirit that Zag took it to mean. Though I still would be forced to argue that the asshat couldn't have tried something like this in an aware society. We've become docile and negligent in all matters of personal defense.
Ignorant or insightful as my view may be, it was the current government of the US that allowed this individual to be fostered. You can make excuses, but the facts will remain unexcused.
So, while I am joking about blaming government, the joke is only funny because there is an underlying element of truth to it. Stick that in your pipe and smoke it.  _________________ The enemy's base is down. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jack_Ian
Big Endian
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 5:14 pm Post subject: 30 |
|
|
Mein Kampf and The Communist manifesto seem like troll-bait to me.
Maybe he's a meatworld troll.
I say we ignore him and move on. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Samadhi
+1
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 9:48 pm Post subject: 31 |
|
|
| Quote: |
| the Tea Party's strategy of swamping the "Town Meetings" and just shouting them down was not a new idea, it was the first time that such a policy was organized on such a large scale. |
The other side has been doing that for years Zag. Plus there are more examples of SEIU shouting down people than the Tea Party types doing so. Liberals on campus are very happy to shout down those they don't agree with. Or throw pies in their face. That this is somehow new and an indictment of the Tea Party* seems an odd opinion to have.
*The few occasions it did happen were just that, a few. And, to me, it seemed they stopped happening very quickly. I'd like to think because they recognized that it's a shitty tactic. _________________ And he lived happily ever after. Except for the dieing at the end and the heartbreak in between. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Thok*
Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jan 10, 2011 11:37 pm Post subject: 32 |
|
|
| Chaz wrote: |
| Though I still would be forced to argue that the asshat couldn't have tried something like this in an aware society. We've become docile and negligent in all matters of personal defense. |
He got within 3 or 4 feet of Giffords at a public event and started shooting with a concealed semiautomatic weapon; it's unclear that he obviously revealed his intentions before he pulled out the gun. Several people responded by tackling him (and a third person grabbed a magazine from him when he was trying to reload his gun.) A fourth person started applying triage techniques almost immediately.
Also, multiple people noticed something was really wrong with him while he was at Pima Community College and the Community College said "Either get a mental evaluation or get kicked out."
So, I'm trying to figure out what would have happened differently in a more aware society. Would they have shot him before he revealed his intentions with their detect insane person with a gun sense? Would he have been shot during community college, or would his fellow community college students forcibly put him in an insane asylum? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chaz
Vote: Zag
|
Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 12:15 am Post subject: 33 |
|
|
| Thok wrote: |
| So, I'm trying to figure out what would have happened differently in a more aware society. Would they have shot him before he revealed his intentions with their detect insane person with a gun sense? Would he have been shot during community college, or would his fellow community college students forcibly put him in an insane asylum? |
In a strictly Anarchist (read: defense aware) society he probably would have been mobKilled long before it came to this. _________________ The enemy's base is down. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jack_Ian
Big Endian
|
Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 12:20 am Post subject: 34 |
|
|
I wonder if the local shopkeeper was aware of his mental instability before selling him the weapon.
The right to bear arms should be restricted to a musket. Anything else should require a little more effort to acquire.
The target is irrelevant.
The issues are guns and mental health.
Even if you are paranoid about personal security, you are as good as dead if a crazy person is intent on your death and there is ready access to such lethal weaponry.
Sometimes I despair at comments about the bad guys have weapons so the good guys need them. It's a vicious cycle.
If possession of an unlicensed weapon put you in jail for an extended period and if handguns were restricted to security personnel, while on duty, gun crime would be reduced. It stands to reason.
The right to bear arms was a way to prevent the government from taking rights from citizens. I don't believe it was ever intended to mean that each citizen is entitled to such extreme offensive capability.
Last edited by Jack_Ian on Tue Jan 11, 2011 12:38 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chaz
Vote: Zag
|
Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 12:34 am Post subject: 35 |
|
|
Indeed. What we needed was laws to prevent this sort of thing from happening. _________________ The enemy's base is down. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chaz
Vote: Zag
|
Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 1:06 am Post subject: 36 |
|
|
What's to stop a crazy person from getting a job working as "security personnel" in some no-name desperate company who would lower the bar all the way down?
What's to stop him after he does? _________________ The enemy's base is down. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Thok
Oh, foe, the cursed teeth!
|
Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 1:17 am Post subject: 37 |
|
|
| Chaz wrote: |
| What's to stop him after he does? |
What's to stop him from convincing a mob that certain people are a risk to kill others and need to be put down? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chaz
Vote: Zag
|
Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 2:33 am Post subject: 38 |
|
|
A bigger mob. _________________ The enemy's base is down. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot
|
Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 2:37 am Post subject: 39 |
|
|
Yay! Mobs all the time, and the guy who can afford the biggest one wins!
Seriously Thok, give it up. Chaz has formed this world view that is based on the concept that "Right will win out" and is, no doubt, religiously inspired. There's no point in arguing with it |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Thok
Oh, foe, the cursed teeth!
|
Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:44 am Post subject: 40 |
|
|
| Fair enough Zag. I really just wanted more evidence for when I notify the Utah police to watch out for Chaz as a potential risk. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|