The Grey Labyrinth is a collection of puzzles, riddles, mind games, paradoxes and other intellectually challenging diversions. Related topics: puzzle games, logic puzzles, lateral thinking puzzles, philosophy, mind benders, brain teasers, word problems, conundrums, 3d puzzles, spatial reasoning, intelligence tests, mathematical diversions, paradoxes, physics problems, reasoning, math, science.

   
The Grey Labyrinth Forum Index
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups    RegisterRegister  
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Ender's Game Mafia is over. Congrats, Town!!
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
 
Reply to topic    The Grey Labyrinth Forum Index -> Mafia Games
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Chaz
Vote: Zag



PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2011 6:24 pm    Post subject: 121 Reply with quote

I'm starting to question the logic about suspecting people who switched to Sentran. I don't think scum could have guessed that he was about to be lynched.

I would mostly suspect people who weren't voting for Sentran--yes I realize that would include me in my own suspect list.

I do think we can get more info from the wordy kill then we can from the lynch.

Day one lynches are almost always random, but night one kills are calculated.
_________________
The enemy's base is down.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot



PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2011 6:43 pm    Post subject: 122 Reply with quote

Official vote count

MNOWAX -
Chaz - Snik
raekuul -
Undercover Monk -
Sniklac16 -
Ctorj - Jedo
Lifeinmomland -
Jedo the Jedi -

Not voting: MNO, Chaz, rae, UMonk, Ctorj, Mom
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Lifeinmomland
Soccer, dance, doctor's appt. this AM.



PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2011 7:22 pm    Post subject: 123 Reply with quote

Chaz wrote:
Day one lynches are almost always random, but night one kills are calculated.


I am not following the logic on scum killing one of thier own Day 1. I watched I believe it was 3 differnt "bandwagons" try to go and stall, it seems to me counterintuitive for scum to bellive that Sentran's wouldn't stall as well. All they would have to do was wait for the deadline, without meeting the vote count. To my way of thinking, that means we should look closer at the people who did not vote Sentran. Almost Fonz Cool
_________________
Who is John Gult?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Chaz
Vote: Zag



PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2011 10:10 pm    Post subject: 124 Reply with quote

I disagree.

Scum wouldn't have expected Sentran to actually be killed, so we can't glean too much info from his lynch.

Wordcross's death though, scum probably did plan that (as in "it probably wasn't a random choice" kind of "planning.")
_________________
The enemy's base is down.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Ctorj
Did I spell that right?



PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2011 10:22 pm    Post subject: 125 Reply with quote

Sniklac16 wrote:
BAH!! Fine with hopes of chatter picking up a bit here im gonna go ahead and vote Chaz for unusual behavior in a game

For the sole purpose of getting things going, vote: Chaz.

I don't particularly think he's actually scummy though. everyone is playing real conservative this game.
_________________
"Love is the absolute expression of the human perfection" -Me!

Created by MyFitnessPal.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger
Chaz
Vote: Zag



PostPosted: Fri Mar 04, 2011 10:25 pm    Post subject: 126 Reply with quote

Nothing has happened yet. . . Mostly because nothing is happening.

Vote: Ctorj.

Straight up revenge vote. I meant to hit mom with it, but ran of out of quota time as I was about to post it.
_________________
The enemy's base is down.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Lifeinmomland
Soccer, dance, doctor's appt. this AM.



PostPosted: Sat Mar 05, 2011 12:33 am    Post subject: 127 Reply with quote

Alright, so here is my somewhat convoluted logic. IF Sentran's lynch was random, meaning the other scum didn't throw him under the bus, then the only clue we have for scum is the first night's death. That being said... wouldn't the scum have gone after a person who did vote for Sentran, being that he was scum?

But they didn't. They went after Wordcross, who was one of the few ineffective votes that day. I having a hard time drawing any conclusion from Wordcross's death UNLESS it was a revenge vote. He voted for Ctorj. I realize my logic is thin here, but really, it has all been this so far, the scum had nothing to gain from Wordcross's death unless Ctorj is scum.

*sigh* Yeah... I know. Thin and convoluted. Maybe it's because I am new, I just don't see who had anything to gain from Word's death. Dispirited
_________________
Who is John Gult?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos



PostPosted: Sat Mar 05, 2011 5:24 am    Post subject: 128 Reply with quote

you guys keep using either/or reasoning here. Normally i hate both/and arguments but here it applies. Sentrans vote was random in that it was basically luck that the bandwagon worked. However that doesnt mean one of the later voters was not scum. Nor does it mean there wasnt a good reason to switch the votes as had been pointed out Sentran was jumpier than a fish outta water.

info can be taken from this lynch but only in context. I still havent gone back and analyzed the thread but it is on my massive to-do-list.
_________________
The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Ctorj
Did I spell that right?



PostPosted: Sat Mar 05, 2011 5:51 am    Post subject: 129 Reply with quote

Zag wrote:
Official vote count

MNOWAX:
Sniklac16: wordcross,
Ctorj:
Chaz:
Sentran: UMonk Jedo raekuul Sniklac MNO Lifeinmomland
Lifeinmomland:
wordcross: Ctorj,
Undercover Monk: Chaz, Sentran
Jedo the Jedi:
raekuul:


ok, looking at the final vote count, I have some observations since actions speak louder than words.

If Chaz was scum, why would Sentran, a fellow scum, hop on a bandwagon to another scum? The odds of that happening are astronomical. I just don't buy it. For the moment, this clears Chaz & UM. (tentatively, of course)

unvote: Chaz

Assuming we have 2 scum left, (we could have only 1, don't know for sure), Wordcross is dead, then only the people who lynched Sentran are left. At least one of them, fair to say, is scum.

This leaves:
Jedo
raekuul
Sniklac
MNO
Lifeinmomland

This is my FOS list. I will analyze their posts in more detail soon.

One last thought: Since scum just lost on fo their own, wouldn't it be likely that they would be more quiet Day 2? Just a thought...
_________________
"Love is the absolute expression of the human perfection" -Me!

Created by MyFitnessPal.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger
Ctorj
Did I spell that right?



PostPosted: Sat Mar 05, 2011 6:00 am    Post subject: 130 Reply with quote

Ctorj wrote:
One last thought: Since scum just lost on fo their own, wouldn't it be likely that they would be more quiet Day 2? Just a thought...

Jedo has the least amount of posts on Day 2 with a grand total of 1 post. Also partial, OMGUS.

Vote: Jedo
_________________
"Love is the absolute expression of the human perfection" -Me!

Created by MyFitnessPal.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger
Lifeinmomland
Soccer, dance, doctor's appt. this AM.



PostPosted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 3:12 am    Post subject: 131 Reply with quote

[quote="Ctorj
If Chaz was scum, why would Sentran, a fellow scum, hop on a bandwagon to another scum? The odds of that happening are astronomical. I just don't buy it. For the moment, this clears Chaz & UM. (tentatively, of course)
[/quote]

Would you rate those odds as astronomical as say... killing a scum on a random day 1 lynch??

I am still going through post looking for fishy behavior, but there isn't much yet, Add to that, the silence that seems to be the order of the day so far... I have nothing beyond a suspicion of Ctorj, and that is thin at best. Course, if I go by people being quite as a fishy thing... then everyone BUT Ctorj is fishy.

*bangs head on wall* Crying or Very sad
_________________
Who is John Gult?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MNOWAX
0.999... of a Troll



PostPosted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 2:34 pm    Post subject: 132 Reply with quote

vote Jedo the Jedi
_________________
The Man The Myth The Legend
MNOWAX
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot



PostPosted: Sun Mar 06, 2011 7:36 pm    Post subject: 133 Reply with quote

Looking for a little more action, here, folks. Let's put a tentative deadline of Wednesday at noon (EST).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
raekuul
Lives under a bridge & tells stories.



PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 3:20 am    Post subject: 134 Reply with quote

R> Vote Count
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot



PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 3:52 am    Post subject: 135 Reply with quote

Official vote count
Code:

MNOWAX ------------
Chaz -------------- Snik
raekuul -----------
Undercover Monk ---
Sniklac16 ---------
Ctorj ------------- Jedo Chaz
Lifeinmomland -----
Jedo the Jedi ----- Ctorj MNO 

Not voting -------- rae UMonk Mom

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Chaz
Vote: Zag



PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 4:13 am    Post subject: 136 Reply with quote

Alright. Jedo looks good.

Unvote Ctorj; Vote Jedo the Jedi
_________________
The enemy's base is down.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
raekuul
Lives under a bridge & tells stories.



PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 4:30 am    Post subject: 137 Reply with quote

I believe that we are at L-2 right now. Jedo, if you would be so kind as to claim or defend or something so that we're not going into this all half-caulked?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Ctorj
Did I spell that right?



PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 4:49 am    Post subject: 138 Reply with quote

Lifeinmomland wrote:
Ctorj wrote:
If Chaz was scum, why would Sentran, a fellow scum, hop on a bandwagon to another scum? The odds of that happening are astronomical. I just don't buy it. For the moment, this clears Chaz & UM. (tentatively, of course)


Would you rate those odds as astronomical as say... killing a scum on a random day 1 lynch??

Killing a scum on Day 1 is not astronomical. However, in my scenario, I find it astronomical that 2 scum would both vote a 3rd scum on Day 1, especially since they're all veteran mafia players.

------- I edited this to fix the quotes, because I found it too confusing. --Zag
_________________
"Love is the absolute expression of the human perfection" -Me!

Created by MyFitnessPal.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training



PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 5:08 pm    Post subject: 139 Reply with quote

First things first:
Jedo the Jedi in sign-up thread wrote:
I don't want to be modkilled, so this goes here.

I am leaving tomorrow afternoon and will be gone until Sunday night. Hopefully I can get one post in on day 2 if Zag is on the ball. Don't miss me!

Now that we have that taken care of, onward to posting!

MNOWAX wrote:
Jedo's lack of vote switching then promptly doing it two posts later sounds fishy. Jedo care to explain this?

Well, I remembered there have been a few times when I was accused of fence-sitting for doing something like saying I'll vote and waiting to see if there is support. For many people they think that is something scum would do (and I think rightfully so). I decided to take the inevitable accusation that I'm doing something to allay suspicion instead of the fence-sitting accusation.

Beyond that, I don't see why my vote was even mildly suspicious. I gave reasons for it, noting a potential mounting attack, and decided to go with it. I'm not the one who encouraged others to join me. I was content with him not being lynched, but I thought I should put my money where my mouth was. If other people saw a similar pattern or agreed with the logic, then they would vote and we would have a non-bandwagon lynch, otherwise I would just return to my previous vote and someone still would have been lynched. (This is targeted at Monk's comment which followed MNO's.)

Defense over, attack to follow.
_________________
Paragon Tally: 18 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training



PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 5:30 pm    Post subject: 140 Reply with quote

My vote is currently on Ctorj, and I like it there. Here's why:

1) His first day contributions are mostly null. Mostly some one-liners and a comment about not seeing anything solid. It's kind of understandable, but if you generate discussion, things always pop up. His contributions do not lean toward the category of "generating discussion." Also, the vote on wordcross was a flimsy, ancient-meta vote. Also understandable considering the "rust," but with the other it looks more suspicious.

2) Day 2: votes for Chaz even though he "isn't particularly scummy." This is not a good play. Scum wanting to look productive and blend in? Maybe. The vote is abandoned shortly after doing some research.

3) Uses some logic for why Chaz is now innocent: scum wouldn't vote each other day 1. This is huge WIFOM and not a very strong argument. Distancing and bussing are pretty classic, and when the going gets tough, the scum do crazy things. You do what you have to do. (Thank you, Sarah.)

4) Points out that at least one of the people voting Sentran are scum. No kidding. How many other people speculated that already? Again, trying to look productive. Wait for the setup to turn on Jedo...there it is! Scum are silent day 2, and Jedo is silent, ergo, Jedo is scum. Easy target. (Since I cleared up my silence, I should be off the list now.)

5) Look at Ctorj's most recent post. The astronomical occurrence is two scum voting a third on day 1. *shrug* Maybe, maybe not. It's not unheard of. That doesn't clear Chaz like it apparently did earlier. Chaz and Sentran being scum could have both voted for Monk who is town. That's not part of the astronomical unlikelihood. It also is conveniently ignored as a possibility.

So, based on Ctorj's logic, both other scum (assuming there are two) were not voting Sentran, meaning at most one was voting their buddy. The two (uncleared) people not voting Sentran were Ctorj and Chaz. You can see where I smell something foul.
_________________
Paragon Tally: 18 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos



PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 6:49 pm    Post subject: 141 Reply with quote

see i was thinkin the same thing as jedo for awhle and i couldnt put my finger on just why ctorj was setting off my sumdar. but after jedos post i went back and saw this monstrosity.

Ctorj wrote:


Assuming we have 2 scum left, (we could have only 1, don't know for sure), Wordcross is dead, then only the people who lynched Sentran are left. At least one of them, fair to say, is scum.

This leaves:
Jedo
raekuul
Sniklac
MNO
Lifeinmomland

This is my FOS list. I will analyze their posts in more detail soon.


even if you clear chaz on weak reasoning. and you clear me on the horrible reasoning that i wouldnt bus sentran (more on that later) then that still leaves you and your useless vote on wordcross. Even if you know your town a true townie only clears themselves when they have solid evidence. leaving your name off the list and being one of the few talkers today puts you in a position of power so you leave your own name off the suspect list to force the flow of discussion away from you.

As to the sentran lynch. while i was again spot on for the first lynch the circumstances are much different from the death-eater game.I had a bandwagon myself so if I was scum bussing my scum-mate helps clear my own name. in DE I had no bandwagon so going so hard on Chaz would have been dumb move so early but this game it was a toss-up who was going to die. So no I can not be cleared just yet.

Looking back at sentran he was lynched really fast.
mine was the first with jumpyness as reasoning plus some OMGUS (as I said before this does not clear me)
second was jedo who had already voiced suspicions of sentran

Then in under 12 hours time sentran amassed 4 more votes. look how slow the day was going before this and we amass 4 votes on a scum in less than 4 hours. No freakin way.

raekuul and snicks votes seem like normal day 1 bandwagon votes. MNOWAx's post and vote was classic MNOWAX behavior. this leaves only momlands hammer which could be a bus to end a fast moving wagon and avoid suspicion. (but im not sure she has the expirience to pull that move off)

so to me that leaves me with enough info to form a simple scum-o-meter

Ctorj: didnt seem to be online when sentran was lynched. so we dont know how he/she??? would have responded. however his behavior on day 2 has raised enough flags to put him at the top of my scum list for now. (8/10)

Chaz: had a chance to switch his vote tom sentran before jedo. he chose to keep his vote on me due to my percieved silence and bad excuses from last game. now that we know sentran was scum his voting with him is suspicious. Chaz is expirienced enough to know voting with a known scum is bad news but when he posted sentran was in no (apparnt) danger.
still its not enough to convince me yet. (7/10)

lifeinmomland: hammered sentran. its possible that she saw how fast sentran was going down and wanted to be seen aiding in the scums downfall. but that would be a brilliant play for a newb. How many times have you played momland elsewhere or in RL??? (4/10)

raekuul: added the third vote on scum. could be a bus as he had no idea the other votes were added that quickly. voted cause i asked him to join the bandwagon. this actually serves as a possible connection to me. If Im scum raekuul goes way higher on the list. (3/10)

Jedo the jedi: his absense now explained lowered my suspicion alot. he did switch his vote but had talked about voting sentran for awhile prior to the vote switch. while not cleared he is definately not one we would want to lynch yet as his posts are usually lengthy and informitive. If ctorj ends up being scum jedo is most definately cleared. (3/10)

MNOWAX: playing his usual crazy game. added the fifth vote. Its conceivable that he saw the writing on the wall but unlikely that bussed him with a fith vote that quickly. but it is mnowax he has an image to maintain. (2/10)

snicklac16: same with MNOWAX. no way a fellow scum adds a 4th vote so quickly. without that vote the bandwagon might have stalled at 3. he left the door open for a blood thirsty MNOWAX and an eager to make her mark momland. so yeah. (1/10)

Undercover Monk: I always include myself in these, and while i can not be cleared i know im not scum and twice now have led the lynchings of scum on day 1. You should probably keep me around. (0/10)

any thoughts???
_________________
The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Ctorj
Did I spell that right?



PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 7:00 pm    Post subject: 142 Reply with quote

Jedo: Your flimsy points are weak at best and a poor defense for your play, especially on Day 1. Your initial reason for voting me you said is "a feeling" which has nothing to do with logic. I doubt you can go into more detail about your "feeling" on this except to back it up with weak points in an effort to validate your initial vote.

1. (won't requote for sake of space) You said my contribution was null. It's Day 1. Where you expecting role claiming? *rolls eyes*

2. My vote for Chaz is listed as scummy because I didn't find him "particularly scummy", but your vote on me for a "feeling" goes without saying? I don't think so, my friend.

3. When the going gets tough? IT'S DAY ONE! How tough can it be? (Unless you are scum and feeling some pressure already. Hmmm...)

4. Your silence is explained and that's fine. I already said my vote was partially OMGUS. Voting for people generates discussion. This is not scummy.

5. I have never heard of 2 scum voting for their 3rd scum fellow on Day 1. If you have heard of it, feel free to quiote the Mafia game. But that's all moot point anyways since the point was that I am going by odds. You also failed to mention that I do not buy their innocence, just temporarily they are off my radar. Another attempt to paint me as scummy by ignoring the valid parts of my arguments.

Overall, I do not blame your attack on me since everyone has a right to defend themselves. You have failed to prove your point. I will acknowledge any logical argument, but there's a lot of that lacking in your post.
_________________
"Love is the absolute expression of the human perfection" -Me!

Created by MyFitnessPal.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos



PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 7:05 pm    Post subject: 143 Reply with quote

the going is tough for scum they lost a member on day freakin 1. also if you want logic take on my post its chalk full of logiccy goodness.
_________________
The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Ctorj
Did I spell that right?



PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 7:10 pm    Post subject: 144 Reply with quote

Undercover Monk wrote:
the going is tough for scum they lost a member on day freakin 1. also if you want logic take on my post its chalk full of logiccy goodness.


Just read it. While there is a fair amount of logic there (Bravo), what "flags" am I showing? Any examples? Your paragraph on me was short for someone at the top of the scum list.
_________________
"Love is the absolute expression of the human perfection" -Me!

Created by MyFitnessPal.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Yahoo Messenger
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos



PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 7:40 pm    Post subject: 145 Reply with quote

i actually agreed with jedo on most of his points. but it was the post i quoted that put you over the top. My vote was going back and forth between you and chaz in my head but youve clearly been leading the discussion and been rather sneaky about how you did it. thats enough for me on day 2 you didnt lynch scum and you are leading the town with bad logic. notice i only had you at 8/10 so if you can convince me then i will change my vote but you havent really responded to either post.

looking at your responses to jedo:

1. jedo said that this could be do to rust and a slow game but with the others it makes you look worse. (This is true regardless of the reason so lets move on to the more substantial claims)

2. this really has nothing to do with his original #2. he had a bad feeling about you did the research and then confirmed his vote. thats perfectly logical. feeling are perefectly valid reasonings if backed with logic. which he did.

3. already covered this. you didnt really make an argument about this point just argued language. poor responses from you so far. It is tough going for the scum right now

4. you again do not address the main point in fact i am going to copy and paste his #4 and your #4 so you can explain how you refuted this point. maybe im just not following you here...

jedo:Points out that at least one of the people voting Sentran are scum. No kidding. How many other people speculated that already? Again, trying to look productive. Wait for the setup to turn on Jedo...there it is! Scum are silent day 2, and Jedo is silent, ergo, Jedo is scum. Easy target. (Since I cleared up my silence, I should be off the list now.)

ctorj: Your silence is explained and that's fine. I already said my vote was partially OMGUS. Voting for people generates discussion. This is not scummy.

so your saying because your vote was OMGUS that it isnt scummy cause that just silly

Confused

#5 I think what he was saying was that you ignored chaz as a suspect even though it is very likely he and sentran were voting for me a townie. I already showed exactly how two scum could have voted sentran. If i am scum then we have two scum bandwagons and i asked my partner raekuul to join my bandwagon. There a perfectly reasonable and logical way for two scum to have lynched . so its not astronomical.

In fact right now there is no way to tell how many scum were on the sentran wagon. we dont have enough info. You didnt really address any of his core accusations you just twisted his words and misrepresented what he said.
maybe thats why you didnt want to use quotes
_________________
The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Lifeinmomland
Soccer, dance, doctor's appt. this AM.



PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 7:58 pm    Post subject: 146 Reply with quote

Undercover Monk wrote:

lifeinmomland: hammered sentran. its possible that she saw how fast sentran was going down and wanted to be seen aiding in the scums downfall. but that would be a brilliant play for a newb. How many times have you played momland elsewhere or in RL??? (4/10)


I have never played this game before this game. I starteds casue Sentran talked about it quite a bit (endlessly really), and I have read the book series, so I felt it was the best one to start on and see if I like the game.

Extreme Delectation
_________________
Who is John Gult?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lifeinmomland
Soccer, dance, doctor's appt. this AM.



PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 9:54 pm    Post subject: 147 Reply with quote

Huh, it looks like I allowed my 6 year old to type my last post.
Well... moving on. Surprised

In reviewing posts, the only thing that sticks out is lots of reliance on past games, which I can not judge having not been involved, and the death of Word. I stand by my notion that, had the vote on Sentran had been a deliberate act of the mafia, someone on that vote would have been targeted night one. Since they were not, I believe I must look seriously at who did NOT vote Sentran. Ctorj's arguments in defense of himself did not convince me, Chaz has not struck me as anything at all, much less scummy. So... thin as it may be, I will come down on this side of the fence.

VOTE CTORJ
_________________
Who is John Gult?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot



PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 10:01 pm    Post subject: 148 Reply with quote

9 posts today, from 4 different people -- much better. If we get at least 4 more posts and at least 2 more new people before tomorrow morning, I will extend the deadline. However, for now, it stands.

Deadline: Wednesday at noon (EST).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
MNOWAX
0.999... of a Troll



PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 10:17 pm    Post subject: 149 Reply with quote

i'm here to take out JEdo. he refused to answer the previous question, and my vote will stay there until he does.
_________________
The Man The Myth The Legend
MNOWAX
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos



PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 10:24 pm    Post subject: 150 Reply with quote

Zag I think your being a little harsh with the deadline posting slows to a crawl every weekend on the labyrinth. I suspect that it will pick up now that weekend is over.
_________________
The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos



PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 10:25 pm    Post subject: 151 Reply with quote

what previous question???
_________________
The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot



PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 10:34 pm    Post subject: 152 Reply with quote

Undercover Monk wrote:
Zag I think your being a little harsh with the deadline posting slows to a crawl every weekend on the labyrinth. I suspect that it will pick up now that weekend is over.

And look at that, 3 more posts and one more new person. You only need one more new person to post and the deadline gets extended.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
MNOWAX
0.999... of a Troll



PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 10:58 pm    Post subject: 153 Reply with quote

sigh i didn't read his post a while back, he answered me about his vote switching.

Unvote
_________________
The Man The Myth The Legend
MNOWAX
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training



PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 11:18 pm    Post subject: 154 Reply with quote

You mean this?
MNOWAX wrote:
Jedo's lack of vote switching then promptly doing it two posts later sounds fishy. Jedo care to explain this?

To which I responded,
Jedo the Jedi wrote:
Well, I remembered there have been a few times when I was accused of fence-sitting for doing something like saying I'll vote and waiting to see if there is support. For many people they think that is something scum would do (and I think rightfully so). I decided to take the inevitable accusation that I'm doing something to allay suspicion instead of the fence-sitting accusation.

If that doesn't do it or isn't the question I'm supposed to answer, then I'm at a loss.

Ctorj, I really like how you used rhetoric to paint me as some sort of idiot first before going into my points, then you continued to do so as your responded to each. It's a good tactic.

1) No, not role claiming. Plenty of other people offered things up for debate/discussion. We certainly didn't fill three pages with the type of posts you made.

2) This isn't day 1. If you don't find somebody scummy for some reason or another, you should go read again. If you still don't find anything, rather than slapping your vote down somewhere, just wait until someone gives an argument you find convincing.

3) Monk answered this one well: the scum lost one of their buddies and they may have seen it coming (and subsequently joined up on it). Besides that, the real crux of my point here was you clearing Chaz on flimsy logic. I wish you would have chosen the point to rebuttal instead of the supporting evidence.

4) Half of your reason for voting me is gone then (which also led others to vote me, for the record). This is day 2. Individual people have information from night actions, and we collectively have some info from yesterday's votes and the night kill. We also have only eight people. We don't have the leeway to be making OMGUS votes.

The real problem here is that again you are voting for someone who is "not particularly scummy" (though maybe now you find something scummy in my defense), and others are going along with it! You are willing to potentially lynch a townie over this stuff when surely there is something out there which actually looks scummy? That is scummy in my book.

5) I don't care about the likelihood of that situation either. The point is you used that probability to incorrectly clear another player because you didn't consider further possibilities. The logic is flawed, and I pointed that out.

As for their "temporary innocence," all that means is you will have to find some other reason for lynching them beside this, or you are leaving yourself a back door so you can attack them again later. It doesn't matter to me either way because you can't use that logic to clear them from suspicion now. I think it worked conveniently so you could come after me. In recent history, I've nailed two scum who were setting up to attack me. I can do it again.

Ctorj wrote:
Overall, I do not blame your attack on me since everyone has a right to defend themselves.

It's this subtle rhetoric that really gets to me. My attack on you was not for the purpose of defending myself. I defended myself in the post before I attacked you. This was straight-up scumhunting.
_________________
Paragon Tally: 18 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training



PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 11:28 pm    Post subject: 155 Reply with quote

Now, I do want to briefly defend one other point from Ctorj. I first voted you on a feeling which understandably seems poor. Here are the circumstances surrounding that vote.

I had posted my leave of absence in the sign-up thread because it was night and I wanted to avoid a modkill. Day began before I left, so I wanted to get a post in giving my thoughts. I said I thought one of the Sentran voters was scum and that I would come back to that later. I also mentioned I had a bad feeling about you. Sure this wasn't based on in-depth analysis and logic, but many times feelings prove to be more accurate. (Look up the Getty kouros sometime.) I decided to put a vote down before my departure as a place holder and reminder to follow it up on my return. When I returned, I waded through your posts and realized why I felt that way and decided to stick with it, posting my reasons along with the affirmation.

Given this exchange, I continue to like my vote.

(Aside: I think Monk responded well on my behalf, but I decided to share my own perspective.)
_________________
Paragon Tally: 18 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos



PostPosted: Mon Mar 07, 2011 11:51 pm    Post subject: 156 Reply with quote

I will give ctorj one more day to respond before i add my vote to the pile.
_________________
The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Chaz
Vote: Zag



PostPosted: Tue Mar 08, 2011 7:12 pm    Post subject: 157 Reply with quote

Yeah, Jedo's logic seems believable. I think I was suspicious of Ctorj anyway.

Unvote Jedo; Vote: Ctorj
_________________
The enemy's base is down.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot



PostPosted: Tue Mar 08, 2011 9:53 pm    Post subject: 158 Reply with quote

It's still pretty slow -- we're only on page 4! But it did pick up a bit, so I'm pushing the deadline back by one day, to Thursday noon, EST.

This is still a soft deadline. If there is significant action I'll extend it further or remove it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos



PostPosted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 4:57 am    Post subject: 159 Reply with quote

I gave him a day so now time to add my vote. I cant remember if its 4 to lynch but even if its a hammer im cool with that.

Unvote, Vote: Ctorj
_________________
The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot



PostPosted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 5:12 am    Post subject: 160 Reply with quote

There are 8 people, so it is 5 to lynch. That makes 4 on Ctorj, so day is still ongoing.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Display posts from previous: by   
Reply to topic    The Grey Labyrinth Forum Index -> Mafia Games All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Page 4 of 7

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Site Design by Wx3