| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
i_h8_evil_stuff
Daedalian Member
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Neo
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2004 8:41 pm Post subject: 2 |
|
|
It's not up to the retailer to design the package. It's the job of the artists and recording company.
And 75,000 for a swear word? Bullshit. _________________
Ad Astra
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dread Pirate Westley
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2004 8:52 pm Post subject: 3 |
|
|
Neo, my lawyers will be contacting you shortly. I fully expect our lawsuit to reach class-action status.
While I have nothing but contempt for Wal-Mart, this lawsuit is ridiculous. If someone wanted to sue them for selling an edited version of the CD with the "offensive" word removed, then we'd be getting somewhere. _________________ The sooner you accept one simple truth, the sooner we can all get along with our lives.
I'm right. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Travis*
Guest
|
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2004 9:00 pm Post subject: 4 |
|
|
| I h8 is being sarcastic with the thread title. Another ridiculous mass tort that the consumer eventually pays for. It ends up costing everyone but the attorneys involved. Ih8tohear about this kind of stuff. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
i_h8_evil_stuff
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2004 9:38 pm Post subject: 5 |
|
|
Actually, I was serious. They refuse to sell items that could possibly offend anybody because it's "family values" that matter. Well, that and the fact that they can do anything. After all, they stopped selling anything by Sheryl Crow simply because she said "Watch our children as they kill each other with a gun they bought at Wal-Mart discount stores." And I know that a store can refuse to sell whatever to whomever they want, but the fact that they find the word "shit" more dangerous then the guns in the hunting section just blows my mind. They're so contradictory that they deserve this.
And that's my opinion. _________________ Space for sale. PM i_h8_evil_stuff for details. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Travis
Daedalian Member*
|
Posted: Sat Dec 11, 2004 10:12 pm Post subject: 6 |
|
|
Sorry to jump to conclusions, h.
| Quote: |
| They refuse to sell items that could possibly offend anybody because it's "family values" that matter. |
Apparently they don't since you're offended by the hunting supplies.
| Quote: |
| After all, they stopped selling anything by Sheryl Crow simply because she said "Watch our children as they kill each other with a gun they bought at Wal-Mart discount stores." |
It's not in Walmart's best interests nor is it their obligation to peddle someone's merchandise who attempts to capitalize on their corporation's good name using cheap sensationalism.
| Quote: |
| And I know that a store can refuse to sell whatever to whomever they want, but the fact that they find the word "shit" more dangerous then the guns in the hunting section just blows my mind. |
Who found the word more dangerous, Walmart or the people launching
the suit?
| Quote: |
| Well, that and the fact that they can do anything. |
It sounds like an underlying envy of Walmart's low prices and general customer satisfaction!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Neo
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2004 3:04 am Post subject: 7 |
|
|
| i_h8_evil_stuff wrote: |
Actually, I was serious. They refuse to sell items that could possibly offend anybody because it's "family values" that matter. Well, that and the fact that they can do anything. After all, they stopped selling anything by Sheryl Crow simply because she said "Watch our children as they kill each other with a gun they bought at Wal-Mart discount stores." And I know that a store can refuse to sell whatever to whomever they want, but the fact that they find the word "shit" more dangerous then the guns in the hunting section just blows my mind. They're so contradictory that they deserve this.
And that's my opinion. |
I just took a quick tour of the Wal-Mart music section here in town. 10 different Parental Advisory stickered CDs.
And for the record, there are several policies handed down by Betonville I don't agree with. The Sheryl Crow thing I haven't heard (but will look to verify next time I'm there), and part of me wonders why she singles out Wal-Mart, where a member of management is required to finish every firearms sale.
Back to the topic though, this lawsuit shouldn't make it. People sue Wal-Mart all the time for the stupidest reasons, and I expect that this one will be out the window too. It's right up there with the suit against my local store a few years back. A family bought a go-cart, and dispite the 4 seperate warning labels that one area was not to be used as a seat, the father and son went on a ride with the son riding in that spot. The cart rolled and the son was killed.
2 hours later they were at Wal-Mart returning the disassembled go-cart. Once finished, they began the process of filing a lawsuit. _________________
Ad Astra
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Travis
Daedalian Member*
|
Posted: Sun Dec 12, 2004 8:00 am Post subject: 8 |
|
|
| It didn't work! I followed the steps you guys told me and the thread did not move to Off Topic. But now my desktop is gone and I've lost all my music files. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Neo
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Wed Dec 15, 2004 12:21 am Post subject: 9 |
|
|
Picked up a third job for winter break. Taking care of books, movies, and music at wal-mart (via a third-party vendor).
Guess what I found while doing music? Sheryl Crow. Lots of it. _________________
Ad Astra
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2004 8:58 pm Post subject: 10 |
|
|
| Do they sell that specific song? Looooove is a goood thing |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Neo
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2004 9:34 pm Post subject: 11 |
|
|
I don't know. What IS that specific song? _________________
Ad Astra
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Fri Dec 17, 2004 5:35 am Post subject: 12 |
|
|
| Love is a Good Thing, by sheryl crow, released somewhere around 96 or 97? Watch out sister, watch out brother, watch our children while they kill eachother, with a gun they bought at waaal-mart discount stores... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chuck
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Wed Feb 16, 2005 9:35 pm Post subject: 13 |
|
|
Montana to levy tax on Wal-Mart?
| Quote: |
| MISSOULA, Montana (Reuters) - Montana's state legislature is targeting the big-box megastores that have taken the place of the old Western general store, weighing a special tax to offset welfare costs for low-paid employees of the retailers. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chuck
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2005 1:18 am Post subject: 14 |
|
|
Wal-Mart Sovereignty
By CHRISTOPHER CALDWELL
Published: December 12, 2004
Americans claim they favor leaders who understand their wants, have a track record of creating jobs and can be ruthless when required. Sounds like Wal-Mart! Maybe that's why, last spring, the Arkansas-based retail behemoth asked the citizens of Inglewood, Calif., to hand it the reins of government.
When the Inglewood City Council rejected Wal-Mart's bid to open a 130,000-square-foot superstore, company executives did not sulk. They disparaged the council as the captive of outside special interests, particularly organized labor. And with the help of election professionals, they collected more than 10,000 signatures to sponsor a ballot referendum to reverse the decision. In the ensuing referendum campaign, the company spent more than $1 million to convey the idea that it would create hundreds of jobs and pump up the local tax base. Opponents emphasized what they saw as the company's legacy of blighted downtowns and falling wages.
Ultimately, though, voters were most upset by something else: Wal-Mart's initiative would have exempted the company from Inglewood's zoning, planning and environmental laws and established a provision whereby the deal could be altered only by a two-thirds vote of the public. By the time voters rejected the initiative at the ballot box in April, this strategy had acquired a name: Wal-Mart Sovereignty.
There's nothing new about the urge to turn economic power into political power (and vice versa). Misgivings about it aren't new, either. But in times of economic transformation, when society renegotiates what is public and what is private, the questions that arise get really nettlesome. Should inmates pay their debt to society through the middleman of a for-profit prison company? Would you say no even if it meant more criminals on the street? Should sports moguls pocket fortunes from publicly financed stadiums? Would you say no even if it meant your city lost its baseball team?
For a long time, Wal-Mart steered clear of such quarrels. It was out of sight, out of mind, building retail space mostly on the ahistorical, apolitical exurban frontier. But more and more, it is encroaching on communities that are more settled -- Inglewood is part of Los Angeles County -- more ideological or snobbier. The Inglewood referendum won't be the last time voters are invited to trade citizen rights for consumer rights -- and no one should make any glib assumptions about which of those rights Americans hold more dear. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pablo
Never Draws a Blank
|
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2005 2:46 pm Post subject: 15 |
|
|
Wal-Mart is not unique. They are the biggest and most identifiable of a number of American companies which have adopted a new "business model" in recent years.
Businesses used to compete based on either having a better product, offering a better service, being more convenient, or being better at forming personal relationships... or a combination. Now they compete by offering a lower price. The only way they can consistently do that is to gain enough market share that they can "bully" their suppliers. Their supplierss cannot afford to say no to their unreasonable demands. As "nice" as Wal-Mart is to their customers, they are hell on their vendors. Home Depot is the same, as is Lowe's, although both are probably amateurs compared with Wal-Mart.
This "business model" is not good for our economy, nor is it good for our society. Wal-Mart is gaining too much power and it's unhealthy for everyone, except Wal-Mart. I don't know if they will ultimately "collapse under their own weight", or whether they will continue to grow until they are the only retail option in the country, but until they are my only option, I do not shop there and encourage others not to shop there. You can see how effective my little campaign is.
I still don't want the government to "help" with this problem. We'll work it out somehow. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Samadhi
+1
|
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2005 5:09 pm Post subject: 16 |
|
|
| If it's actually not good for the economy as you say, then yeah, it will work itself as long as the government doesn't interfere. I'm not sure I agree with your claim though, but then I haven't looked into it in depth. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
extro...
Guest
|
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2005 6:21 pm Post subject: 17 |
|
|
| Nothing is bad for the economy, it's just that with some people there is a failure to appreciate certain economic circumstances. Like poverty, for instance. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Samadhi
+1
|
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2005 7:43 pm Post subject: 18 |
|
|
| Or theft... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pablo
Never Draws a Blank
|
Posted: Wed Jun 22, 2005 10:55 pm Post subject: 19 |
|
|
| Samadhi wrote: |
| If it's actually not good for the economy as you say, then yeah, it will work itself as long as the government doesn't interfere. I'm not sure I agree with your claim though, but then I haven't looked into it in depth. |
Wal-Mart has driven some good companies out of business and driven others to overseas locations. There was a documentary on TV about them recently. Remember the company called "Rubbermaid"? They got too dependant on Wal-Mart and Wal-Mart found a cheaper supplier. Maybe they were destined to fail, but a gradual failure of a company is healthier. The economy can absorb the displaced workers, but only so fast. I have personally dealt with Lowe's and Home Depot and have had relatively high level meetings with their purchasing people. It's not pretty. You do what they say or else. No negotiating. No appreciation. No consideration. "I'm in charge here, and either you drop your price 10% or we'll never buy from you again." I walked away from a Lowe's ultimatum once, and a $3,000,000 per year customer became a $0 customer. They haven't bought pipe from me in 3 years now. It's all free enterprise, which I totally support. It's not perfect, but it's a hell of a lot better than government intervention. The Wal-Mart / Home Depot model is one of the imperfections we have to live with.
I've been to Lowe's main warehouse in Southern Cal. It has over 300 truck bays. Imagine a system complex enough to handle and keep track of all the items coming in and going out every day. It's mind boggling. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
shylshela
Icarian Member
|
Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2011 10:15 am Post subject: 20 |
|
|
Is Wal Mart discriminationg against white people and not hiring them in some of their stores? My neighborhood Wal Mart has very few if any caucasian people working there. I have seen one, in the deli and I have been shopping there for a while. What is going on? I know white people who are out of work and have tried to apply there with no luck.
_________________________________
external keyword tool ~ keyworddiscovery.com ~ keycompete.com ~ compete.com ~ webmasterworld.com
Last edited by shylshela on Thu Aug 11, 2011 5:33 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
JDTAY
obseletes now
|
Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2011 11:41 am Post subject: 21 |
|
|
| shylshela wrote: |
| Is Wal Mart discriminationg against white people and not hiring them in some of their stores? My neighborhood Wal Mart has very few if any caucasian people working there. I have seen one, in the deli and I have been shopping there for a while. What is going on? I know white people who are out of work and have tried to apply there with no luck. |
Preach it, brother! Damn corporate America, always holding the white man down.  _________________ Prohibit nothing. Disclose everything. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MNOWAX
0.999... of a Troll
|
Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2011 1:35 pm Post subject: 22 |
|
|
Excellent first post!
Tat being said, I think Walmart is satan's asshole. I hope I don't get sued over saying that. _________________ The Man The Myth The Legend
MNOWAX |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Tired of his old title
|
Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2011 1:39 pm Post subject: 23 |
|
|
| I can see the lawsuit now: Satan v. MNOWAX, suing for libel and slander. Don't worry, though, I don't think he can show any damages. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MatthewV
Daedalian Member :_
|
Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2011 7:55 pm Post subject: 24 |
|
|
| If you win a lawsuit against Satan, do you get your own place in hell? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dread Pirate Westley
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2011 8:00 pm Post subject: 25 |
|
|
| Well, if I were asking damages from Satan, I'd have him enjoined against ever gaining claim to my soul. Not that it matters; he has all the lawyers. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Death Mage
Raving Lunatic
|
Posted: Fri Aug 05, 2011 9:32 pm Post subject: 26 |
|
|
Wait, I thought all these spammers were from China or Taiwan or Timbuktu. They have Wal*Marts there? _________________ * These senseless ramblings brought to you by Insanity™. If you just can't figure the dang thing out, it must be Insanity™.
[YOUR AD HERE!] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lepton*
Guest
|
Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2011 1:42 pm Post subject: 27 |
|
|
| Mainland China, yes, but not in Taiwan, which is an already-saturated market. As for Mali: not yet. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Death Mage
Raving Lunatic
|
Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2011 2:27 pm Post subject: 28 |
|
|
Well, I for one am shocked, SHOCKED, to hear that Wal*Marts in China are not hiring enough "whites". _________________ * These senseless ramblings brought to you by Insanity™. If you just can't figure the dang thing out, it must be Insanity™.
[YOUR AD HERE!] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Poisonium
annoyed by the old
|
Posted: Sat Aug 06, 2011 11:16 pm Post subject: 29 |
|
|
Whenever I go to stores like Wal-Mart, I always buy a giftcard so I have an excuse to wave at acquaintances who spot me. _________________ I tried apt-get install lifebut it only returned E: Couldn't find package life |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|