| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Chuck
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2012 2:46 am Post subject: 401 |
|
|
| 17 to 17 with 4:07 left in the game. The Fortyniners have the ball on their own 35. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chuck
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2012 2:48 am Post subject: 402 |
|
|
| The Fortyniners are 0 for 10 on third down conversions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chuck
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2012 2:58 am Post subject: 403 |
|
|
| 0 for 11. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chuck
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2012 3:08 am Post subject: 404 |
|
|
| Overtime coming up. My 27 to 17 prediction can't come true. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chuck
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2012 3:29 am Post subject: 405 |
|
|
| Fortyniners fumble. The Giants have the ball on the Fortyniner 24. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chuck
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2012 3:34 am Post subject: 406 |
|
|
| Giants 20, Fortyniners 17, final score. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2012 4:31 am Post subject: 407 |
|
|
Hello, 2007 repeat. This was the worst I could imagine for the Superbowl. (Okay, the Steelers going and winning would have been worse, but that's it.) _________________ Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot
|
Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2012 6:10 am Post subject: 408 |
|
|
I think I would have preferred that we play the 49ers, but I don't care that much either way. Considering how terrible the Giants looked, maybe that is the easier opponent to defeat. Either way, that the Patriots are in it is all that really matters, well, that they win it. That's the best outcome. Whom they beat to do it is less important.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos
|
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 12:00 am Post subject: 409 |
|
|
yeah Pats are in it but the ravens were robbed. Im not sure if lee eveans caught that pass but it should have been reviwed. Just the NFL once again doing anything in their power to placate brady and belicheck. How am I supposed to enjoy the superbowl village and all the festivities with Pats fans walking the streets of my town. =(
Pats dont stand a chance. would have lost to either the NFC team. In fact so would the Ravens. the NFC was just heads and tails above the AFC this year. _________________ The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot
|
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 1:24 am Post subject: 410 |
|
|
Considering how pathetic the Giants looked in their game, I would have to disagree. If it weren't for one idiot punt returner screwing up TWICE (Was it the same guy, or two different idiots?) they wouldn't have won.
Anyway, even though we didn't really see much of it last game, we have Tom Brady, and you ... well, you have Eli Manning, which is also pretty darn good. (My comment in the Denver game was that we have Tom Brady, and you don't, to steal a Chevy Chase line. Maybe not so true against the Giants.) Still, the teams are close enough that it clearly isn't a gimme. It's not the mismatch that, for instance, the 2001-2 Superbowl was, where the Rams were such obvious (14 point!) favorites over the Patriots. Oh, wait ... we won that one; didn't we?
Also, I watched that incompletion in super slow motion, clicking forward one frame at a time on my DVR. It would not have been overturned on replay (though I agree it was close enough that they should have reviewed.) He had already picked up his foot by the time he had control, and the ball was knocked out before that foot landed again.
Last edited by Zag on Tue Jan 24, 2012 1:28 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 1:27 am Post subject: 411 |
|
|
I saw a thing on nfl.com which showed 4th quarter stats, and Manning has a helluva lot of clutch. If the Giants can break up Brady's O-line, they will do just fine. _________________ Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot
|
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 1:41 am Post subject: 412 |
|
|
I'm not arguing that the Giants should probably be favored in this match. but not that much, and a lot of that is hangover from the regular season, much of which the Pats seem to have patched up in the post season (i.e. their horrendous defense). My note was a response to
| UMonk wrote: |
| Pats dont stand a chance. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 1:45 am Post subject: 413 |
|
|
I'm just talking football. _________________ Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos
|
Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 11:36 pm Post subject: 414 |
|
|
@Zag actually I agree with a lot of what you had to say. Its just that the giants looked bad against what may have been the best overall defense in the NFL this year, In a hostile rain soaked enviroment. Both games were went down to the wire so its not like the pats rolled over baltimore. My insistence on a giant victory is more just a reflection of how good the NFC was this year.
two heavy weight contenders the saints and packers didnt even make the championship match that how good the niners and giants were. dont tell me that the patriots were a better TEAM than the niners, saints, or packers. and remember Im an AFC fan but if you are objective about it the giants should be favored just cause they are the NFC champion.
so yes Tom Brady (as much as it pains me) is a better QB than eli BUT the giants are the better team. Lets see how the re-newed Pats D does against an explosive pass game. Brady has faced Tebow and Flacco (who while he played well is not in eli's league) Eli and the Giants will be different. _________________ The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot
|
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 12:03 am Post subject: 415 |
|
|
I realize that you were using hyperbole, and didn't really mean NO chance.
I agree that, on paper, the Giants are the better team. Maybe not by as much as you think they are, or even the book-makers in Vegas, but I agree that they are better. On paper. Of course, on paper the Packers were much better than the Giants, and look what that got them.
But that's why we play the games. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MatthewV
Daedalian Member :_
|
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 5:44 am Post subject: 416 |
|
|
Professional sports should be about mindless, shameless pride. The Pats are going down!
errr who are they playing? When is this game? I don't care- They are going down!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Quailman
His Postmajesty
|
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 1:20 pm Post subject: 417 |
|
|
What is this, the w00t and crap football thread? We already know who the winner is here:
| Quote: |
| Code: |
This
Player Week Total
------ ---- -----
Quailman 442 5173
sAbLLimINal 568 5100
Undercover Monk 0 4309
MatthewV 481 4259
Suspence 0 4207
Zag 0 4184
JDTAY 422 4154
ShadowSword 0 3613
Jaguar 0 3387
dethwing 0 0 |
|
Sorry. I just won a Mafia game that I didn't expect to, so I figured I'd come and gloat here too. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot
|
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 1:48 pm Post subject: 418 |
|
|
I just looked it up, and the official point spread is the Pats are favored by 3.5 points! I'm a little surprised. (Also, I'd rather they be the underdogs.)
Remember, though, that the bookies are not really trying to set the spread such that there is a 50% chance of winning either way. They are trying to set the spread so that 50% of the bets are on either side. They don't care who wins as long as the bets are evenly matched. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MatthewV
Daedalian Member :_
|
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 5:01 pm Post subject: 419 |
|
|
OK--- I'll bet $50* worth of pottery the pats will lose. What do you have to offer?
*based on my limited experiences selling pottery. I guess that it would be a very nice large bowl or 2 mugs. I would be happy to come to any agreeable amount because pottery is free for me to make at this time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot
|
Posted: Wed Jan 25, 2012 6:36 pm Post subject: 420 |
|
|
Mrs. Zag was a professional potter for several years. We've got plenty, thanks.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MatthewV
Daedalian Member :_
|
Posted: Thu Jan 26, 2012 5:56 pm Post subject: 421 |
|
|
Ah. The only other item I am usually willing to wager with is beer. I guess I just won't get to profit from their loss  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|