The Grey Labyrinth is a collection of puzzles, riddles, mind games, paradoxes and other intellectually challenging diversions. Related topics: puzzle games, logic puzzles, lateral thinking puzzles, philosophy, mind benders, brain teasers, word problems, conundrums, 3d puzzles, spatial reasoning, intelligence tests, mathematical diversions, paradoxes, physics problems, reasoning, math, science.

   
The Grey Labyrinth Forum Index
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups    RegisterRegister  
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Winter has begun... (Game over!)
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 41, 42, 43, 44, 45  Next
 
Reply to topic    The Grey Labyrinth Forum Index -> Mafia Games
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
itisally
Master of Disguise



PostPosted: Thu May 17, 2012 2:29 am    Post subject: 1641 Reply with quote

Welcome The Great Crep’er!

We started with 21 players

Of the 16 Dead we have:
3 of 16 mafia
Fritzler , Cersei Lannister, mafia godfather, killed Night 1
MNOWAX, Grand Maester Pycelle, Mafia Goon/Follower, vengeance killed Day 5
Zag, Tywin Lannister, Mafia Goon/Puppeteer, lynched Day 6

11 of 16 townies
Jadesmar (Syrio Forel - town vigilante) lynched Day 1
Apple Sause (Renly Baratheon - favored townie) removed from play Day 2
Deception (Eddard Stark, Non-standard Investigator) lynched Day 2
Elethiomel (Arya Stark, Eavesdropper) killed Night 2
Novice( Catelyn Stark - Non-standard Protector) killed Night 2
Lucresia (Septa Mordane, Mason) removed from play Day 3
Amb (Stannis Baratheon- Angry Townie) lynched Day 3
ohcapt13 ( Barristan Selmy- Non-standard Investigator) lynched Day 4
Garou_Kinfolk (Jeyne Poole- Mason) killed Night 4
spyrl ( Gregor Clegane- Vengeful Townie) lynched Day 5
Captin Aniima (Tyrion Lannister - Roleblocker) killed Night 7

1 of 16 Neutral
Durryn (Varys- Rumormonger) killed Night 5

1 of 16 Serial Killer
Cloudrunner (Joffrey Baratheon) lynched Day 7

Alive:
we know for sure that you are a Mason
Aniima and I were linked together as I vouched for her and she was found to be town when the mafia killed her last night. This convirmed what had been in my PM. This seems to be taken by most people as confemation that I am town, but I can't speak for others.
UM has said he has no night abilities and has an alternate win condition.
No solid information from 3iff or Jedo on name or ability that I can recall.

I think it is likely that we have 2 mafia left, although I am not sure how to calculate in nutural parties as far as game balance adn I haven’t given much thought to what characters they might be. Are you familiar with the books of show? LoL already... hahahaha like we haven’t been playing this game since January hehehehe.

In the beginning we had a hard time differentiating between strong personalities and scummy play. This lead to a disastrous run of killing off townies. Someone got lucky with Fritz (SK or VIG), But MNOWAX coming up mafia was a big breaking point as Zag had run a risky gambit of covering what he saw as a MNOWAX mistake.
Anything else important that I am missing here. I really tried to write this as unbiased.

I would love to see a vote analysis this late in the game now that we have a few confirmed mafia, but I don’t think I will have the time as I just started a new class and the pirate season is about to begin.
_________________
I could agree with you, but then we would both be wrong.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training



PostPosted: Thu May 17, 2012 3:30 am    Post subject: 1642 Reply with quote

Names are way more important in this sort of game because the roles have been abnormal. As far as I'm concerned, you're getting nothing until I hear your name. I'm fine with a mass claim, but I'm not going until you finish yours.

itisally wrote:
I think that monk had more confirmed evidence on Zag than you did on Durryn. MNO coming up scum when they are closely linked was real evidence even if it wasn't conclusive, because Zag had no influence over it. Could it have been possible that MNO was a vanillizer, sure, but I thought there were other problems with Zag’s play as well.

Compare the evidence then. There was nothing saying Zag had to be the same alignment as MNO. That's the point. At best then, he had a probability and Zag's posts. I had the same, and for the record, DURRYN WASN'T TOWN. Sure that doesn't make him hostile to the townies, but it also doesn't mean he's always wanting them to live. It's the nature of neutrality.

itisally wrote:
And, Novice noting that MNO might cover for a scum buddy doesn’t equal a pool of abilities to draw from. It means they have each other’s backs. I have read about a pool of abilities, but it would not fit with this theme or what we have seen in my opinion.

It was not "MNO covering for scum" but MNO needing a claim and stealing from his buddy. It's a little different because MNO is the one in the hotseat. In fact, it's obvious now that it kind of screwed them. Also, how does the small council (since it seems obvious that's the idea) making use of their different strengths not fit with the theme?

itisally wrote:
Let’s face it Aniima had not given a lot of examples of stellar logic before coming forward with her results. Anyone could have had a reasonable doubt based on her play, especially as a newb. Really, accepting the possibility that she could be wrong is considering other options.

The problem is Monk is using the fact that Aniima had doubts as reason for his own. I showed how her doubt was unfounded, therefore Monk's was also. I'm not saying he can't doubt it, but he can't say her doubt is his own if hers is false. My doubt was if there really was an SK in the game at all, but I thought the reward out-weighed the risk.

itisally wrote:
It may just be my experience, but a quiet mafia member can hide in the shadows a lot longer than a verbose one. Getting them to talk increases the chances of them saying something that will give them away. That is the point of pressuring lurkers. Not that every lurker is scum, however; just looking at lurkers tends to make the scum post more because they don’t want to be considered lurkers. It is hard to find scum , as you claim, with arguments on “outdated” mafia theory.

Just what are we talking about here. This doesn't seem to follow directly from my post. I'll just talk about what is here.

I understand it is traditionally harder to catch a lurker mafia than a verbose one (except in this lurker-hunting group). The problem is, 3iff wasn't really being a lurker when Monk made the remark. In fact, he only targeted him saying there had been no pressure on him so he needed some. 3iff's play had become much more involved from his early game, and was in fact comparable to your contributions. I think what's happening here is you are reading into or attributing things to Monk's statements that aren't actually there. If you would see what he is actually saying, I think you would realize why I'm grilling him and why I think he is scum.

I'm not sure what that last part means, but I am arguing that Monk's reasoning leads to many more WIFOM situations.

itisally wrote:
As for Circumstantial evidence…THIS IS MAFIA!... it is all circumstance.

Thus the change in terms...

itisally wrote:
Jedo, I have never seen a game go dead completely for lack of a hammer, nor did I feel as though this game had yet gone stagnant. Of course that is because I have a life and hadn’t posted in ::Gasp:: 24 hours! But I am sure you will acknowledge that it is a matter of perception.

There may be a matter of perception...In the past two game Days, we have had TWO 24-hour periods in which only two posts of content were made, both at the end of a lynch. When we are getting down to the endgame and need to be posting more and discussing possibilities, this is piss poor.

Undercover Monk wrote:
Not anymore. Talk about being a politician. You put more spin on things than a harlem globetrotter. I didnt say Ihad hard evidence but if your willing to admit you lied if i go and find an instance of you saying that then I will delve into other games as opposed to this one.

The pressure is definitely still on you. Deadline will kill you, not me. It's just a name. Are you worried because you don't have a safe claim?

I know you didn't say you had hard evidence...that's exactly my point. Scum like to throw out things like that which make the other person appear scummy, but the actual evidence would show otherwise. It's called muckraking, I believe.
_________________
Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training



PostPosted: Thu May 17, 2012 3:32 am    Post subject: 1643 Reply with quote

An addendum: I also have a life and understand not posting all the time, but a 24-hour period encompasses our most frequent posting times. For that to be down at the end of a Day...not good.
_________________
Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
The Great Crep'er
2% Spambot



PostPosted: Thu May 17, 2012 3:42 am    Post subject: 1644 Reply with quote

Reading through the game is a bit of a slog (Can't believe it took you 16 pages to finish day 1, you are an indecisive bunch, no doubt Enthusiastic Grin) but certain details are jumping out. UM's connection to Deception, Jedo's vote on jadesmar and earlier tangles with Deception and I believe...Fritzler? Durryn? For the life of me, I can't remember now that I've gone and posted. I'll have to check back later.

Having claims at such an uncertainty when 60% of the players (myself included) believe there is a good chance of the game being in a lylo position, does not make one feel easy. We are close to the conclusion here, and I am most likely the next to die should we go into a night phase again. So I encourage your ballsiest plays at this point.

Oh, and a former member of the town has PM'd me. I believe that they should be modresurrected and subsequently modkilled. Cannibal
_________________
Potato. Belgium. Eight. Random Lynch # Mafia awaits.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The Great Crep'er
2% Spambot



PostPosted: Thu May 17, 2012 3:44 am    Post subject: 1645 Reply with quote

Let it be known that my post came before I had knowledge of Jedo's post, if they answered my inquiries there.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
itisally
Master of Disguise



PostPosted: Thu May 17, 2012 3:56 am    Post subject: 1646 Reply with quote

@ Jedo

and yet with fewer players we are more likely to have larger gaps in time. I am also suprised to have you say 3iff has up his contributions to the same level as mine. Read his ISO and then mine, don't look at just the post count but the content even... and while you are at it filter it so it is just the last month. That takes you back to before Zag was Lynched. Is the quality of content there really equal? I think you are grasping at ideas to divert attention from yourself.

And I agree Names are more important... But you seem to miss the point of a mass claim, or it could just be that I don't trust you to come forward after everyone eles.
_________________
I could agree with you, but then we would both be wrong.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Sentran
Ray of Sucking Funshine



PostPosted: Thu May 17, 2012 4:16 am    Post subject: 1647 Reply with quote

Day 8, 5 alive, 3 to lynch
Deadline: Wednesday, 23 May
Current Vote Count
Code:

 Undercover Monk (2): Jedo the Jedi, 3iff
   Jedo the Jedi (2): itisally, Undercover Monk
-------------------------
      Not voting (1): The_Great_Crep’er

_________________
Sentran
"Speaking of double negatives, I haven't read greylab yet today." - Lifeinmomland
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
itisally
Master of Disguise



PostPosted: Thu May 17, 2012 4:45 am    Post subject: 1648 Reply with quote

SO I did a very brief summary of the final day vote counts and here is what I got when I sort by player instead of day.

What I really discovered is that my voting history stinks. Enthusiastic Grin

I do find it interesting that the one day we manage to lynch a scum is the one day 3iff didn't vote at all.

Jedo has a habit of hammering, but he isn't shy about it, however; he is hesitant to do it to zag who is scum.

JEDO
Day 1 Jedo hammers Jadesmar
Day 2 Jedo first vote on MNO (Deception lynched)
Day 3 Jedo alone on Durryn (Amb Lynched)
Day 4 Jedo hammers Ohcapt
Day 5 Jedo on Durryn w/ UM (Spyrl Lynched)
Day 6 Jedo hammers Zag but isn’t happy about it.
Day 7 Jedo second on Cloudrunner with me.

3iff
Day 1 Deception (jadesmar lynched)
Day 2 Deception
Day 3 Amb
Day 4 Oh Capt
Day 5 Spyrl
Day 6 Not Voting
Day 7 UM

UNDERCOVER MONK
Day 1 Jadesmar
Day 2 MNOWAX (Deception Lynched)
Day 3 Amb (hammer)
Day 4 Oh Capt (first)
Day 5 Durryn (with Jedo) (Spyrl Lynched)
Day 6 Zag (3rd)
Day 7 Cloudrunner ( Hammer)

ITISALLY
Day 1 Jadesmar (8th)
Day 2 not voting
Day 3 Amb (1st)
Day 4 Oh Capt (2nd)
Day 5 Spyrl (2nd)
Day 6 Zag (1st)
Day 7 CloudRunner (1st)

I am not sure that this really tells us anything, but it is something to talk about while TGC catches up.
_________________
I could agree with you, but then we would both be wrong.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
The Great Crep'er
2% Spambot



PostPosted: Thu May 17, 2012 6:03 am    Post subject: 1649 Reply with quote

3iff wrote:
UM: That really is cruel and heartless Dispirited picking on the only other person posting here.

You know what's coming don't you...
proceeds to vote for UM, edited out so that there is no chance the mod takes it as my vote

I agree though that it would be nice if some other players made an appearance...

3iff wrote:

UM: "sorry 3iff but it had to be done look what the result has brought"
I knew exactly why you did it and I don't take any offence at it. It brought the rest of the players back into the game which is what we needed, and it smoked out the SK.

UM: Post 1618, "Rolls dice" ??? really?

Jedo: I'm NOT mafia.


While this tussle between the three of you is enthralling, it seems to be woven into the intricacies of previous days which I am woefully behind on. However, I just have to bring up 3iff's recent posts, five days apart (kind of seems petty to pick on ally for a 24 hour gap), the first one, makes a vote based on what seems like personal reasons (hence the "cruel and heartless" and "you know what's coming") with only 7 people left in the game, on the verge of the SK lynch, and having a week of mafia days to work with and base a vote off of.

Then, in the next post, he refers to post 1618 where UM says he rolls the dice (and I think this phrase was misinterpreted, correct me if I'm wrong) when he himself had just based a vote on something arbitrary. He also feels the need to explain to Jedo that he is not mafia when Jedo himself/herself is not clear (excuse me if I confuse genders). He's at a weak arguing stance currently, and that needs to be remedied. I'm just wondering if we have extra room in the pressure cooker to put him in, in order to get more posts of substance and less of blatant sheeping and vindiction.

This "head to head" format cuts us off from a few options in seeing the current scum team. If there is still a possibility that there is more than one, 3iff needs to be examined closely as well.

Still reading, but let us not cut ourselves away from options. Of course, I expect a 3iff rebuttal is imminent. Cannibal
_________________
Potato. Belgium. Eight. Random Lynch # Mafia awaits.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
3iff
very unbifflike



PostPosted: Thu May 17, 2012 7:17 am    Post subject: 1650 Reply with quote

Hi, tgc.

Yes, I'll be posting soon...I have to catch up on the events and discussion from the last few hours.

For now, the "cruel and heartless" comment was meant as a sort of joke, apparently not a very amusing one...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
3iff
very unbifflike



PostPosted: Thu May 17, 2012 8:55 am    Post subject: 1651 Reply with quote

tgc: Note my early play in the game was seriously affected by only having 3 days per week access to the forum. This lasted until the end of March. Hence my post numbers are down. This was announced prior to the game starting. I believe I have been treated fairly despite limited posting opportunities during this period...but it's something I intend to avoid in future games.

itisally: "I am not sure how what UM did makes him scum"
As I've just said, my "cruel and heartless" comment WAS a joke (cue the sad smiley). Then there was a flurry of voting and cloudRunner was voted out... The UM vote on me was simply to get something happening, I voted back on him (there was nothing better to do) and I returned to the forum next day and the lynch target was reached.
itisally: "vote seems fueled by emotion and frustration"
I can now see how that might look to others but I was being light hearted about the previous vote on UM (before the cloud lynch). It obviously failed to be seen in that light.

At that point, while I had suspicions about UM, more-so from his self confessed "off form" performance and his "I got Zag", I was still undecided whether he was town or not.

UM: "Im sure I will be responding to this later as I disagree with all most everything in it but what the heck here's hoping you guys know what your doing. rolls dice."
What the hell is this? UM apparently disagrees with the analysis and yet ends up supporting it...rolling dice to pretend he doesn't make a conscious decision.

tgc: "(and I think this phrase was misinterpreted, correct me if I'm wrong)"
If that question is to me, I'm taking the "rolls dice" at face value as if UM doesn't know what to do. I suppose he could be rolling with probabilities...

From my point of view, itisally is probably town, tgc(Silver) is a mason, Jedo maybe town, I'm town.

Now UM 'claims' he's a neutral...and that's much better than looking like mafia. Now I didn't know that when I voted UM but I think it provides us with some useful information.

UM: "I am basically a vanilla townie (that is no night powers) with an alternate win condition. I have to lynch a certain someone hence why I have been on, I think, every lynch except deception "
Which is UM trying to make himself seem as if he's not a danger to anyone (except perhaps that certain someone).
If this is his true role then we must be suspicious of his motives for selecting anyone he does vote for...and he hasn't yet hit his target. So he's looking for his target and a name will help.
If untrue, then he's mafia.
And actually, lots of townies in lots of games don't have night powers. UM, do you have any DAY powers?

Aniima finding the SK: I was convinced there was an SK (or a second limited shot vig). I believe jadesmar (vig) was killed day 1 so an SK/vig2 must have got Fritzler. There were 2 deaths night 2 (Elethiomel and novice) and then it went quiet...by quiet, I mean just 1 kill most nights. So I assumed it was increasingly likely to be another vig that was out of shots. Aniima's report changed that and she was right.

itisally: "I am also suprised to have you say 3iff has up his contributions to the same level as mine." That's probably correct. My posts (numbers and content) haven't been as much as your contribution. You're obviously helped though by having more infomation (an 'ally' in knowing Aniima).

itisally: "I do find it interesting that the one day we manage to lynch a scum is the one day 3iff didn't vote at all."
If that's the Zag vote, note that I DID vote Zag, was shouted at by cloudRunner for taking it to L-1 too quickly, backed off and then votes happened while I was away from the forum...

tgc: "However, I just have to bring up 3iff's recent posts, five days apart (kind of seems petty to pick on ally for a 24 hour gap)"
Five days apart...is that where there's a weekend and a night to contend with? I'm not aware of criticising anyone specific for a 24 hour gap in posting. Part of the problem is that I'm pretty sure I'm in a totally different timezone to everyone else here...I'm often talking to myself and then have lots of posts to read when I return...like today.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training



PostPosted: Thu May 17, 2012 12:33 pm    Post subject: 1652 Reply with quote

itisally wrote:
@ Jedo

and yet with fewer players we are more likely to have larger gaps in time. I am also suprised to have you say 3iff has up his contributions to the same level as mine. Read his ISO and then mine, don't look at just the post count but the content even... and while you are at it filter it so it is just the last month. That takes you back to before Zag was Lynched. Is the quality of content there really equal? I think you are grasping at ideas to divert attention from yourself.

And I agree Names are more important... But you seem to miss the point of a mass claim, or it could just be that I don't trust you to come forward after everyone eles.

Since the end of March, 3iff has had ~30 new posts with a handful not containing real content. In the same amount of time, ally has had ~40 new posts with an equal handful not containing real content. Pretty close, especially when you consider this is an almost double of 3iff's former posts and content. We can get into a quality of content thing if you want, and that will probably be largely in your favor, ally, but this here makes my statement not as far a cry as you want it to be.

I don't miss the point of a mass claim. The mass claim is designed to have an easy chance of catching scum in a lie, and the order is generally determined by most scummy first. That's Monk, if only because he's first on the chopping block. He gives his FULL claim, then I'll go, followed by 3iff, then the two confirmed town finish their claims. I don't mind doing this because I know it's going to show I'm right.

ally, that VCA is soooo biased. As 3iff already pointed out, you misconstrued his not voting on Zag. Then, you color my hammering, again. My "hesitance" on Zag was wanting to discuss some things before we closed out the day. I think it would have helped us out. But, if you get to keep saying that, I'll start claiming you were scared to be the hammer on Monk today.

Also, Monk has been hammer twice (only one less than me), and he was hesitant on both. What kind of information does that bring up? Sounds to me like a mafia who wants to minimize the flak of being the hammer. Why aren't you riding him about this? If I didn't already know you were town, I would say you were in cahoots. I guess I'll just have to chalk it up that your reads have been off all game, and that still hasn't been remedied even here.

The Great Crep'er wrote:
(kind of seems petty to pick on ally for a 24 hour gap)

I'm not picking on ally for that gap, I'm just noting it in general. If there is a gap of that long, it is definitely a joint effort of the player list. The point was the threat of stagnation toward the end. Though, ally, clearly people can post vehemently when they want to as there are 7 new posts while I've been sleeping (and our timezones are close together).
_________________
Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos



PostPosted: Thu May 17, 2012 1:22 pm    Post subject: 1653 Reply with quote

I dont think so jedo Im not giving you my name til you give me yours so it helps you pick a safe claim. Thats the point. how am i more scummy then you. we have the same votes me and itisally were just a little less cavalier with ours then you and 3iff.

You can at least give a role claim since Ive already done that much. Also I am not neutral I am town no powers just an alternate win condition. If i fail to get my target and the town wins i still win with the town.

I have hammered twice both to ensure I got on the lynch incase the lynchee was my target. But the true hilarious inconsistency about jedo is his insistence that I hard bussed Zag but of course his hammer was not bussing he just wanted the day to end.

In fact lets look at that since you seem to be saying two seperate things.

Post 1626 May 16
Quote:
As for hammering Zag and my response, all I can say is what I've said before: would you rather the day had carried on until the deadline, stagnant with no discussion


Post 1652 May 17
Quote:
My "hesitance" on Zag was wanting to discuss some things before we closed out the day. I think it would have helped us out


If you were so keen on discussion and why did you hammer just to avoid the deadline. Or did you finally agree with my so called coincidental evidence. You could have brought up any concerns with zag or others but you didnt you hammered i was trying to respond to anyone who had a problem with my air tight case do I have to go back and prove that Zag was mafia again cause all I have to do is go to the top of Page 1 and see I was right with my coincidental evidence.
_________________
The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos



PostPosted: Thu May 17, 2012 1:31 pm    Post subject: 1654 Reply with quote

One odd thing about 3iff, not sure if he ever explained it. But I remember him voting for Zag on day 3 then several posts later unvoting citing something cloudrunner said. Odd and I would have gone after it harder if cloud pulled mafia.


TGC I suggest you go back and focus on the pages dealing with Zags lynch following MNO's reveal
_________________
The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
3iff
very unbifflike



PostPosted: Thu May 17, 2012 2:32 pm    Post subject: 1655 Reply with quote

UM: "One odd thing about 3iff, not sure if he ever explained it. But I remember him voting for Zag on day 3 (I think this was day 6...according to the itisally post 1641) then several posts later unvoting citing something cloudrunner said. Odd and I would have gone after it harder if cloud pulled mafia."

The timeline...by post number

1550 Cloud issues an FoS on those voting Zag so quickly
(at the time I think that cloud looked town...to many people)
1563 I vote for Zag (to L-1)
1564 Cloud "thanks" me for doing this
1566 I treat the "thanks" as sarcasm and withdraw my vote 'for now'
1579 Cloud votes Zag (to L-1) at 12.12am Friday my time
1581 I wait for further discussion...if any.
(16 hours pass with no posts)
1582 Jedo hammers at 11.22pm Friday my time.

In an earlier game (Secret theme mafia?) I had a tendency to voterush which had bad consequences for my team (we lost). I was justly criticised for this and so pulled my vote off here to allow discussion. Again, due to time differences, most/all the discussion occurred when I was away from keyboard giving me no chance to get involved when everyone else was on the forum...

Something similar happened over the cloud lynching where I came in Monday morning and saw that UM had put the hammer on cloud at 4.50am my time.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos



PostPosted: Thu May 17, 2012 4:00 pm    Post subject: 1656 Reply with quote

Thanks 3iff like i said if cloud had turned mafia i would have been more suspicious. Your explanation makes some sense but you do have to look at it from my view point. I know Im innocent which by extension makes itisally innocent. we also know TGC is innocent so its between you and jedo for mafia.
_________________
The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
itisally
Master of Disguise



PostPosted: Thu May 17, 2012 8:58 pm    Post subject: 1657 Reply with quote

Laughing I never said my VCA wasn't biased, it was the post before that I made efforts with! lol!

But, anyway, thank you for commenting on it. I appreciate you giving another perspective to the list.

I thought UM's alternate win condition had explained his hammers pretty well. I also though it made more scene of his "roll the dice" comment

Now that I have been reminded I recall thinking 3iff's vote and cloudrunner going back and forth on it was odd.

I don't see why you have to be so defensive about being the hammer. I didn't say that I thought that made you scummy. Your right someone has to do it, however; I agree that saying you want conversation then hammering, when a deadline is coming anyway (it isn't like we would be stuck in limbo forever) is odd, maybe just impatient, or maybe something more. And you were ONLY hesitant on zag, not the other two times so I noted the anomaly. UM was always hesitant or unsure of his hammer.

3iff, if you were just kidding then why are you voting for UM? This is why I say your content is wanting. I reread your posts and still couldn't find an argument of substance against UM. If he is scum I want to get him, but I have to understand to vote. I am afraid to drop such a hammer when I can't find a reason. Same to Jedo, could you in 200 words or less summarize your reasons for voting UM and why his counters on this day have been insufficient?
_________________
I could agree with you, but then we would both be wrong.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
3iff
very unbifflike



PostPosted: Fri May 18, 2012 3:15 pm    Post subject: 1658 Reply with quote

Concerning UM, I have some important information regarding his claim. Hovever, I need to check with the mod to determine what, if anything, I can reveal.

So I would ask no-one to do anything rash until I return on Monday...thankyou.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training



PostPosted: Fri May 18, 2012 8:17 pm    Post subject: 1659 Reply with quote

Undercover Monk wrote:
I dont think so jedo Im not giving you my name til you give me yours so it helps you pick a safe claim. Thats the point. how am i more scummy then you. we have the same votes me and itisally were just a little less cavalier with ours then you and 3iff.

You can at least give a role claim since Ive already done that much. Also I am not neutral I am town no powers just an alternate win condition. If i fail to get my target and the town wins i still win with the town.

Again, you are the one in danger of being lynched by the deadline. More to the point, what you have given us tells us nothing. In fact, I would say that's a pretty convenient claim. We would be fools to let you off just like that. I could claim "non-standard protector" right now, and what would you do? We've already established that names are more important in this game than roles. If Deception had claimed "cop" back before he was lynched, it wouldn't have received the unvotes that claiming "Eddard Stark" did.

You will give us a name and you will name your target. Here's the thing about Lynchers: they are 3rd party. Their only interest is to lynch their target. Lynchers and Survivors are both poor for a town because they don't care about the proceedings as long as their win condition is met. If your target is one of the remaining town, then you want to lynch them regardless of whether it causes the mafia to win. I think that's what is going on here. You made up this claim thinking it would put you in the town's good graces, but if the others truly knew the nature of this claim, they would recognize it's just a bad attempt to save your hide.

Undercover Monk wrote:
I have hammered twice both to ensure I got on the lynch incase the lynchee was my target. But the true hilarious inconsistency about jedo is his insistence that I hard bussed Zag but of course his hammer was not bussing he just wanted the day to end.

I never said my hammer couldn't be a bus, but I do protest the automatic assertion it was scummy and the continued misconstruction of that vote.

itisally wrote:
I thought UM's alternate win condition had explained his hammers pretty well. I also though it made more scene of his "roll the dice" comment

Or that's exactly the point: his alternate win condition explains those actions. Seems pretty convenient.

itisally wrote:
I don't see why you have to be so defensive about being the hammer. I didn't say that I thought that made you scummy. Your right someone has to do it, however; I agree that saying you want conversation then hammering, when a deadline is coming anyway (it isn't like we would be stuck in limbo forever) is odd, maybe just impatient, or maybe something more. And you were ONLY hesitant on zag, not the other two times so I noted the anomaly. UM was always hesitant or unsure of his hammer.

Maybe you didn't say you thought that made me scummy, but it was out there. Let's look back at these:

1) When I hammered jadesmar, it was when at least 2-3 people said they were ready for the day to end. I was prepared to vote for jadesmar, but I had been waiting until the town was finished discussing. (Somebody tried to counter this reasoning citing Monk's post just before mine, but it was a simul-post.)
2) There was no hammer on ohcapt. I moved my vote as we approached the deadline because I wanted to avoid any huge vote flipping like happened with Deception and MNO. Was this perhaps unnecessary or overly cautious? Maybe, but better safe than sorry.
3) I was bringing up points for discussion, tried to get a claim out of Zag, and what was the response? Almost complete ignoring of these things. This time, instead of a spoken will of the people to motivate my hammer, it was the profound silence which initiated the vote.

Suppose I hadn't made that last vote on Zag and 3iff had come back and done it. Would you instead be hounding him about being the hammer, or still hounding me, this time because I hadn't voted for Zag? My thought is votes are bold statements of your feelings about a person, but if I haven't been shy about what I think of certain people, a vote is nothing more than the means of lynching. If it takes seven to lynch and ten people voice that they believe a certain person to be worthy of lynch, are you going to analyze only the first seven people to add their vote? This is why it is nonsense.
_________________
Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos



PostPosted: Fri May 18, 2012 8:37 pm    Post subject: 1660 Reply with quote

interesting 3iff. The intrigue continues. I suggest we give it a rest. In the meantime here's a quote from one of my favorite movies.

murder is basic. No conspiracies, no grand mysteries...no puppet masters behind the scenes pulling the strings.Everyone is capable of murder.
_________________
The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training



PostPosted: Fri May 18, 2012 8:46 pm    Post subject: 1661 Reply with quote

ally, it's difficult to formulate so concise a statement about Monk, mostly because of the well of posts there are. For starters (since I have little time left before I'm gone for the weekend), I will direct you to the areas which bother me most.

Monk's ISO:

The stuff involving the Amb lynch. Read what he has to say about being on the lynch, then what he says following its culmination. Posts 52-65, giving particular attention to 54, 56, 60, and 65.

With the ohcapt lynch, Monk claims I am for sure scum if ohcapt flips scum. What happened when ohcapt flipped town? I'm still scum. Post 67 and 81.

Post 84: The TOWN has done nothing right, yet Monk was a major proponent in the Amb and ohcapt lynchings. (He wasn't the front-runner, but he ultimately vouched both of those lynches should happen.)

Posts 92 and 93: Monk admits I am more townie because of ohcapt's flip. Notice his reasons for coming onto Durryn now.

Posts 104 and 105: It would be good if you read these in tandem with my posts.

Then the stuff from today. I will gladly try to formulate a better argument, but I hope this can suffice for now.
_________________
Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos



PostPosted: Fri May 18, 2012 8:48 pm    Post subject: 1662 Reply with quote

about the Zag hammer from jedo. YES YOU DUNDERHEAD THE HAMMER AUTOMATICALLY IS SUSPICIOUS. Thats the risk you take in hammering you know that and I know that. It has to be done but the circumstances that proceede it are important. You supposedly wanted discussion yet hammered. You didnt have to hammer zag you could have put forth your theories til deadline in the hope of convincing us that I was wrong and zag was innocent. (Of course zag was not innocent so I see why you had difficulties in convincing us.) Instead you hammer/bus him so you can say "look guys I lynched mafia and did you notice how UM was trying so hard to get us to lynch zag he must have been bussing"

also on the above post I meant give it a rest til Monday I am going on a fishing trip this weekend so wont be online at all. and I am very interested in what 3iff has to say on my claim. of course it could be a stall tactic by him and jedo who knows. TGC we really need you to weigh in on this as it is your vote not Jedo's deadline threat that will ultimately break this deadlock (So YEAH jedo forget the deadline if TGC agrees with me and itisally then it you under pressure not me just sayin the deadline has become almost a non-entity.)
_________________
The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos



PostPosted: Fri May 18, 2012 8:52 pm    Post subject: 1663 Reply with quote

simulpost responding is fun isnt it Jedo Laughing

I will have to look back to defend myself but yeah I freeely admit I can be wrong. but I notice you didnt point out my strong opposition to the deception lynch and i still dont see how railroading evil zag is a point against me and yet your reluctance to lynch him is a point in your favor.
_________________
The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos



PostPosted: Fri May 18, 2012 8:53 pm    Post subject: 1664 Reply with quote

also um those post numbers cant be right man we are in the thousands????? Confused
_________________
The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
The Great Crep'er
2% Spambot



PostPosted: Fri May 18, 2012 10:59 pm    Post subject: 1665 Reply with quote

Just letting you all know that I'm still active. Came back from a History Final today, so I will have some free time tonight to hopefully post some commentary on the Zag-MNOWAX controversy. Hopefully, on this recent development as well.
_________________
Potato. Belgium. Eight. Random Lynch # Mafia awaits.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
itisally
Master of Disguise



PostPosted: Sun May 20, 2012 5:36 pm    Post subject: 1666 Reply with quote

Jedo,

I asked why you thought MNO was scummy and you gave a nice defense of your self against him. From that, can I gather that you think he is scummy because he voted for you? (The numbers are from ISO that is why they are low.)

If his claim is true and his target is a townie ( it could be a particular scum) then it is still better to lynch the person who I think is scummy.

It is an unusual role and not one I think would come up as a "safe claim" because it is a rouge role. It would not be strongly town so there isn't as much to gain by it.

That being said, if the claim is true, UM is the only one who can give a role name safely. But Jedo, there is no reason you couldn't give a role as well and we could debate its validity. Then you two would be on an equal playing field.
_________________
I could agree with you, but then we would both be wrong.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
3iff
very unbifflike



PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2012 1:03 pm    Post subject: 1667 Reply with quote

UM, I can't understand why you are reluctant to reveal your target (assuming your claim is valid).

If your target name is mafia (or likely to be mafia, it's sometimes hard to tell in this theme) then why not say it. I hardly think a mafia member is likely to claim such a name in that case. I suppose the problem is if your target is a town player...the mafia are not going to be able (or wish to) claim that name and the real owner of that name will be worried.

Of course, if you're unable to tell us a name perhaps it's because you don't know who remains...stating a name that no-one owns would be rather embarrassing. It's not Sansa Stark is it?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos



PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2012 1:23 pm    Post subject: 1668 Reply with quote

3iff I would have revealed my target already if not for a series of pms between me and the mod. like I said before the mod has not forbidden me to give out this information but he has dissuaded me on several grounds. Let me just say all is not as it seems. I await eagerly the news 3iff promised and TGC's commentary on the Zag happenings.
_________________
The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
3iff
very unbifflike



PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2012 1:44 pm    Post subject: 1669 Reply with quote

Quote:
the mod has not forbidden me to give out this information but he has dissuaded me on several grounds.
Not sure what to make of this...but I'm not blaming you in this instance, just a bit disappointed...why should he be dissuading you?

Quote:
Let me just say all is not as it seems.
Seems to be the understatement of the year!

I'm still mulling the info I have and should be able to disclose it soon.

That thing you said about puppets. I think there is someone pulling strings...and we're all puppets.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos



PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2012 1:49 pm    Post subject: 1670 Reply with quote

If I gave my information you would understand exactly why the mod isnt thrilled that i speak up. Its so tempting but as I feel there is enough I can do at the moment to convince you without claiming tat I am innocent then Im gonna try that
_________________
The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
3iff
very unbifflike



PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2012 2:09 pm    Post subject: 1671 Reply with quote

Ok.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
3iff
very unbifflike



PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2012 2:16 pm    Post subject: 1672 Reply with quote

Quote:
If I gave my information you would understand exactly why the mod isnt thrilled that i speak up.

Arggghhh, you've now got me thinking what the hell can this mean?? What secret can you be concealing?
(I'm not expecting an answer to this.)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training



PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2012 9:31 pm    Post subject: 1673 Reply with quote

Undercover Monk wrote:
You supposedly wanted discussion yet hammered. You didnt have to hammer zag you could have put forth your theories til deadline in the hope of convincing us that I was wrong and zag was innocent. (Of course zag was not innocent so I see why you had difficulties in convincing us.) Instead you hammer/bus him so you can say "look guys I lynched mafia and did you notice how UM was trying so hard to get us to lynch zag he must have been bussing"

I never said Zag was innocent or that you were wrong, so I wasn't really trying to do either of those. In fact, my point of contention here is that you claimed immediately on the next day that your actions should clear you, and I just wanted some discussion rather than a rushed lynch. Discussion is the strongest power of the town (to a point), so why would you want to blow over it?

Undercover Monk wrote:
I will have to look back to defend myself but yeah I freeely admit I can be wrong. but I notice you didnt point out my strong opposition to the deception lynch and i still dont see how railroading evil zag is a point against me and yet your reluctance to lynch him is a point in your favor.

You are right. I wouldn't be pointing out things you did well when I'm citing reasons why you are scum. I can always say you knew Deception was town, so you defended him for town-cred. I can also say you are leaving out my strong opposition to the Amb lynch. What do you hope to accomplish by that? The last sentence is again purposeful misinterpretation.
_________________
Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training



PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2012 9:47 pm    Post subject: 1674 Reply with quote

I'll address ally and Monk's continued obtuseness together.
itisally wrote:
Jedo,

I asked why you thought MNO was scummy and you gave a nice defense of your self against him. From that, can I gather that you think he is scummy because he voted for you? (The numbers are from ISO that is why they are low.)

If his claim is true and his target is a townie ( it could be a particular scum) then it is still better to lynch the person who I think is scummy.

It is an unusual role and not one I think would come up as a "safe claim" because it is a rouge role. It would not be strongly town so there isn't as much to gain by it.

That being said, if the claim is true, UM is the only one who can give a role name safely. But Jedo, there is no reason you couldn't give a role as well and we could debate its validity. Then you two would be on an equal playing field.

I'm not sure to what you are referring in the first sentence. I looked back, but I might have missed it.

The second sentence is true. As long as he isn't jeopardizing the town by going after his own aims, it is better to lynch the scum...if he's telling the truth.

I will say it again, roles mean nothing. The fact that his role is non-threatening is precisely what makes it a good claim. (Plus, there's the fact that it lets him get away with all of his voting blackmarks and there is nothing to prove through results or use of the power.) Anyway, I can claim doctor right now, and what are you going to do about it? You are going to grill me about the choices I made, and then you still probably won't believe me because it's "too convenient." In short, you're going to believe what you want to believe. On the other hand, there aren't exactly an infinite number of believable names left. Names are everything in this game. We should start there before moving on.

Also, mods don't give out safe roles, they give out safe NAMES. Why is Monk so reluctant to give out his name or even just the name of his target? It's more he has to make up! The target may not even be in the game. Plus, who would be a Lyncher from the series? Difficult things to decide, I know. I am telling you, the name is the most important thing. I will again cite Deception claiming Eddard Stark was the determining factor in so many people unvoting him because they understood how much weight that name carried. They didn't have to hear his role. In a themed game like this, the name rules.
_________________
Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
itisally
Master of Disguise



PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2012 2:42 am    Post subject: 1675 Reply with quote

itisally wrote:
Jedo,

I asked why you thought MNO was scummy and you gave a nice defense of your self against him.


Oh my goodness, I can't believe that I didn't catch that. I ment UM.

Jedo, put your money where your mouth is.... give me a name. If you really believe that it would get me to vote UM if I knew his name then the converse would be true, your name would cause me to unvote you. Do you avoid it because you don't want to have to make up more lies?

And how now you think UM's voting is scummy when before you questioned me about only calling one of you scummy for the same behavior? Really, the person with the worst voting history is ME!
_________________
I could agree with you, but then we would both be wrong.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training



PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2012 3:32 am    Post subject: 1676 Reply with quote

Oh my gosh! Why can't you just see how scummy he is?

The mod is advising him on how he should play? That doesn't seem right.

He can't give us either name?

His role claim provides a perfect reason for us not to analyze his voting history?

He is gung-ho on a couple of lynches, then turns around the next day and blames the town?

He constantly misrepresents my actions and statements?

What more do you want?

Fine! I'm telling you that he is the one who needs more help. He dug himself a hole by needing to provide two names to support his story, and now he needs a lead so he doesn't mess that up.

I'm Loras Tyrell.

(P.S. - If you weren't confirmed town, ally, you would be my top suspect. Wink Your voting history really is bad.)
_________________
Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos



PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2012 12:58 pm    Post subject: 1677 Reply with quote

Thank you Jedo it was a long shot that you would choose my character your role is insignificant as I dont know the series and would be unable to verify anything about it.as promised I am Sandor "the Hound" Clegane. perhaps that may enlighten a few of you as to who my target is/was.
_________________
The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos



PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2012 1:56 pm    Post subject: 1678 Reply with quote

Hold it I just thought of an almost fool-proff plan for the town to win. we either have 1 or 2 mafia left. one of us is confirmed town. Im gonna go through all the possibilities and I think we have a way to ensure the town win.

The plan Vote jedo today and if he is innocent lynch me tomorow. if he is guilty and the games moves on 3iff tomorow.

2 mafia left:

Me and itisally: If we follow my plan and the mafia is this team the town is screwed and I cant think of any reasons why this pairing isnt possible since very few of you trust me this plan is dependent on how much you trust itisally.

Me and jedo: again in this pairing the plan is useless. However this pairing is unlikely. what is the likelyhood that the mafia have had two days of straight hard bussing each other. a zag, jedo, um mafia to me seems pretty unlikely.

Me and 3iff: this pairing doesnt make sense. if there are 2 mafia left we are at lyol. 3iff could have jumped on jedo and ended the game. so very unlikely.

itisally and jedo: same as above there would be no reason for itis ally to not have lynched me and won the game a long time ago.unlikely.

itisally and 3iff: same as above. in this scenario both me and jedo would be town going at each other. why would the mafia choose sides when they could have ended one the game by lynching one of us. unlikely.

and last but not least:

Jedo and 3iff:this is the pair the plan is set to attack. I think more likely than itisally and me as even jedo believes ally to be town.


1 mafia left:

TGC: confirmed mason. innocent

Itisally:if she were the only mafia left she could have quick lynched me.

3iff: same as above only for jedo

Me: possible

Jedo: Possible


so as you can see if there is only one mafia left it is most likely me or jedo.

if there are two than it has to be either me and ally or 3iff and jedo. since we need to assume the worst we have to lynch right today so it comes down to how much you guys trust itisally. If you guys are convinced she is town then we follow the plan. Of course if 3iff and jedo are both mafia there is no way either will agree to it so we really need tgc to chime in on whether or not this makes sense. I hope 3iff you are town and this convinces you im doing everything in my power to be fair.
_________________
The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training



PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2012 10:17 pm    Post subject: 1679 Reply with quote

Undercover Monk wrote:
Thank you Jedo it was a long shot that you would choose my character your role is insignificant

I'm not surprised by these statements. It's really a gamble to cross-claim the same name, and I knew you were just waiting to belittle my claim. In case you haven't noticed, the main characters within Sentran's guidelines have all been killed. In fact, I can guarantee that ally's character isn't that big.

That plan is indeed fool-proof...minus the fact of the person behind it. I'm betting my buck you are the last mafia. You lynch me today, kill TGC tonight and use ally's cred with you to take out 3iff tomorrow. If I happen to be wrong and there are two mafia remaining, it's 3iff. According to you, the pairing doesn't make sense because you could have ended it already, but there just might be a problem with that: why has there been no kill on two nights? It seems to me there is obviously something in the mafia's way. It's a possibility you are conveniently leaving out so you can push your "fool-proof plan."

I still think you are the last one though.
_________________
Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos



PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2012 11:11 pm    Post subject: 1680 Reply with quote

LOL Oh jedo trying so desperately to tarnish me with total lies your last post didnt even make sense. If there are two mafia left and we lynch a townie then its 2 on 2. the night kill doesnt matter. the mafia can just deadlock the day as long as they post first and a true townie never votes in haste when you are in Lynch or Lose territory which is exactly what you and 3iff did. vote a townie so that the deadline would win you the game. but TGC replacing in has foiled your scheme I hope 3iff is town cause if he is you are screwed and we will win
_________________
The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Display posts from previous: by   
Reply to topic    The Grey Labyrinth Forum Index -> Mafia Games All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 41, 42, 43, 44, 45  Next
Page 42 of 45

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Site Design by Wx3