|
|
|
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
The Great Crep'er
2% Spambot
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:56 am Post subject: 281 |
|
|
| MNOWAX wrote: |
| The Great Crep'er wrote: |
| I can't believe anyone would put Amb and Garou on a scumlist. Unless they are completely suicidal, out of their mind scum, there is a slim to nim chance that they are lying. Even if there is a kernel of doubt about their claims, it would be better to express it when we receive a bit more mod-confirmed information about the game that makes the mason claim seem dubious. It is a question for D2 and onward, not D1. |
Hence why I haven't VOTED FOR EITHER OF THEM.
My votes on LIML. |
Well that's nice but I WASN'T COMPLAINING ABOUT YOU VOTING FOR THEM.
Scumlist, you have no argument to put their claims into doubt as of yet so it is pointless to put them on a scumlist.
Frankly, it's a little ridiculous that you still doubt them enough to do that and yet vote for ONE person you have a scumtell on when you have TWO people who you think have a scum connection. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Garou_Kinfolk
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 4:57 am Post subject: 282 |
|
|
| MNOWAX wrote: |
Hence why I haven't VOTED FOR EITHER OF THEM.
My votes on LIML. |
So my immediate thought on this is possible paranoia about being on a town lynch so your vote is on...a place holder? I'll look up tomorrow why you voted her again. Now for bed. _________________ Most posts made from my phone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Great Crep'er
2% Spambot
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 5:14 am Post subject: 283 |
|
|
| Deception wrote: |
| Deception wrote: |
| In that case I especially have no problem running you up for death. |
I'll explain this when it is no longer anti-town to do so, if I'm still alive. |
IGMEOY Deception
And, Stray Note: The more I look at jadesmar's most recent vote, the more it looks like a blatant wagon attempt. The only reason it's concerning for me is because it is a 180 from jade's previous, "hardboiled" stance on Deception. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sentran
Ray of Sucking Funshine
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 6:09 am Post subject: 284 |
|
|
Active for a Sunday, aren't you? I decide to see if anything new has been posted, and it went over a PAGE?!
Quick thoughts...
After Amb's claim and before Garou's confirmation, I was torn about voting him. It could have been an early gambit by a mafia that allowed others to claim later, but that would only work if he survived. Otherwise, the mafia would ignore the claim, so it was a safer claim before the confirm. Garou's post puts the whole thing in a different light, since they are now tied together. As others have pointed out, losing a Mason is better than losing a more powerful role, and the odds of hitting scum on Day one are mighty slim. If the Amb lynch went ahead, we'd have either two confirmed town or two confirmed Mafia, with only one of those two dead. Either way, that lynch gives positive information. I'm not saying I approve of such a lynch yet, but it is a possibility.
Since my own read is not getting any response whatsoever, I'll Unvote and wait for a few more reactions. _________________ Sentran
"Speaking of double negatives, I haven't read greylab yet today." - Lifeinmomland |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jadesmar
Bad Puppy
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 12:34 pm Post subject: 285 |
|
|
| The Great Crep'er wrote: |
| Deception wrote: |
| Deception wrote: |
| In that case I especially have no problem running you up for death. |
I'll explain this when it is no longer anti-town to do so, if I'm still alive. |
IGMEOY Deception
And, Stray Note: The more I look at jadesmar's most recent vote, the more it looks like a blatant wagon attempt. The only reason it's concerning for me is because it is a 180 from jade's previous, "hardboiled" stance on Deception. |
Don't get me wrong I do think Deception is 100% scum, both literally and figuratively.
I just can't get any traction there. So, ya.. I'll hop on a bandwagon containing two "confirmed" townies. Definitely. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 2:00 pm Post subject: 286 |
|
|
TGC did an excellent job (you missed Mackay in non voters) his vote count is now official and updated to reflect current standings.
| The Great Crep'er wrote: |
Unofficial Votecount:
| Code: |
Day 1
8 votes needed to lynch
(4) MNOWAX: Amb, The Great Crep'er, Garou_Kinfolk, jadesmar
(3) Jedo the Jedi: itisally, Zag, Captain Aniima
(1) Amb: Jedo the Jedi
(1) Deception: LifeinMomLand
(1) LifeinMomLand: MNOWAX
(1) jadesmar: Deception
Not Voting: Applesauce, Mackay, ralphmerridew, Sentran |
|
Now to some housekeeping:
posting does slow here on the labyrinth over the weekend even for the mod. so dont expect a bunch of votecounts or prods from friday afternoon to Monday morning. If apple doesnt post this week i will prod him. As to a deadline I am not placing one yet but as they say in court room drama "Your objection is noted."
@Deception: If you wouldnt mind can you remember to unvote before you change your vote. It does really help when updating the vote count.
Name calling: PLEASE try to be respectful of peoples wishes. those of you with name issues try to be aware that in MOST cases no offense is meant. It may have just been a typo. lke ths seee. I don't want the thread to dissolve into non game related arguments. So far no one has crossed a line, lets keep it that way.
Thank you, now you can get back to murdering one-another like civilized people.  _________________ The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 2:45 pm Post subject: 287 |
|
|
A new style of catch-up for myself:
Page 5: Mostly Zag/TGC back-and-forth. TGC reads very town, especially in the face of all the flak. Zag keeps using an unconvincing argument that he is "more subtle as scum." The subtlety level of a remark does not necessarily rest with you, Zag. Some of us know you are more subtle, so we are looking for it. This line of defense might be a nice thing to say when you aren't as subtle as you think you are. Also, the lurker lynch is a bad idea. We have stuff to go on. We have analysis and people we find scummy. The main point of a Day 1 lynch is to get information about associations between people. Amb suggesting this makes me more suspicious.
Page 6: More lurker lynch stuff. I already made my comments generally. I will say I don't find MNO to be particularly scummy right now. I made a comment earlier referencing his quietness. He has been quiet when he has a significant town power and doesn't want attention. I was hoping not to be explicit about this. Still, it's not a free pass. I think jadesmar is still neutral (and snarky). A couple of quotes.
| The Great Crep'er wrote: |
| I think your first point is a very common mafia game belief. That if lurkers start to change their habits once targeted, it usually sends out a signal of much more trouble down below. |
I just want to say the purpose of most lurker lynches is to drum-up more participation for them, so a response of more involvement/posting should not then signify scumminess. That's called baiting.
| itisally wrote: |
| Second, I second guess myself too much. In the last 2 games I was town in I had voted for scum on day one by feel and then allowed myself to be swayed too easily. I really have a scum feel from Jedo. MNOWAX is next in my mind and then Deception (whose change in style may just be getting used to this site or may be a change in tactic) He is normally prettty in your face about stuff and he has normally been town and misread (or removed for annoyance -- a bad reason to lynch, or because he is distracting -- a slightly better reason to lynch but still not good) |
My question: What would cause you to change your mind about these gut reads? At least for the first two, that seems to be a "they fooled me last time, so I won't let them fool me this time" gut reaction. Conscious or otherwise, it's worth considering. I mean, I'm not really helping my case with you because now you will think I'm trying to sway you from your read of me, but maybe you'll at least think about these things.
Page 7: Amb is right that deadlines are a good thing because they give the town purpose and a goal. This is why I prefer a deadline to be set from the start with the option for extending (though the last only rarely). He is not scum for that. TGC pointing out that MNO should have voted Amb when he says, "we have an ambscum," is a good point. Deception's subsequent vote on Amb is based on poor reasoning. As for Amb's claim, I can't believe Garou came to his aid so quickly. If a mason dies, that means the remaining mason(s) will eventually be confirmed. Don't let the scum know who doesn't have a power! Also, I'll just say this is exactly the type of thing I don't like happening on Day 1. We now have THREE CLAIMS! Stupid.
This needs a separate section: jadesmar and Deception, stop bogging down the thread with this pettiness. Yes, jadesmar shouldn't be so nit-picky, but Deception, I think it should be very permanently ingrained in your head by now. Plus, voting over that is straight-up ridiculous. That's not pro-town, and it isn't playing the game. It seems like you've been onto other people for that...
Page 8: Do you people, in all your games of mafia playing, not learn to differentiate scum and town posts/traits? TGC, that post by Deception stating he wants to lynch Amb despite the claim is not scummy! He may be scummy for other reasons, but that's just saying it might be wise to confirm the mason bit early. Plenty of people are thinking it. This game is way too full of petty, not-thinking statements. Filter things, people! If something looks scummy, think about why. Think about how else it could be interpreted and why. Be the best townie you can be and grow some brains!
Anyway, I'm going to leave my vote on Amb for now. There are some possible scum options for lynch (Zag and very maybe MNO), but Amb would provide a helluva lot of info which could be extremely useful for Day 2. Them is the breaks. If he hadn't claimed, we wouldn't have to be worried about people intentionally choosing to lynch for information. Now people will want to add "willing to lynch (confirmed) townie" to my list of scum traits. Oh well. Maybe I'll change my mind after some thinking. _________________ Paragon Tally: 18 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ralphmerridew
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 3:49 pm Post subject: 288 |
|
|
UM:
I'm not that upset that TGC got my name wrong. TGC didn't know it mattered to me. When I pointed it out, he apologized. That's enough for me.
Deception's response was to insult me. That puts him in jerk territory.
Next, as far as masons go:
When somebody makes an uncontested mason claim (barring scenarios when you're close to endgame), you unvote them. Period.
A bunch of masons in the late game are extraordinarily powerful. The mafia simply can't let that happen. Sooner or later, they must kill the masons. And when they do, the rest of them will be confirmed.
Make the mafia use their kill to get rid of the masons. I'd expect bad play of that form from a relative newbie like Deception, but I expect better of Jedo. Vote: Jedo |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 4:07 pm Post subject: 289 |
|
|
| ralphmerridew wrote: |
Next, as far as masons go:
When somebody makes an uncontested mason claim (barring scenarios when you're close to endgame), you unvote them. Period.
A bunch of masons in the late game are extraordinarily powerful. The mafia simply can't let that happen. Sooner or later, they must kill the masons. And when they do, the rest of them will be confirmed.
Make the mafia use their kill to get rid of the masons. I'd expect bad play of that form from a relative newbie like Deception, but I expect better of Jedo. Vote: Jedo |
Let's at least admit first that this is mafia theory. People may have differing views which are not inherently scummy. (The trick is to sift through that stuff and decide which it is.)
Yes, masons in the late-game can be extraordinarily powerful, but at some point, you have to question the validity of the claim. After all, scum have mason gambled before, so it's possible for it to happen again.
Scenario: Last game (when I was scum), we had a mason claim on Day 1. Garou (the other mason in that game too) came out to help his buddy when the buddy was close to being lynched. The mafia chose not to target the masons for a couple of days. We wanted to leave the option open for a mis-lynch. When one of the masons was "mod-killed" and the role was confirmed, then we targeted the remaining masons.
I want to argue the same will likely be true here. You can't always go around testing claims by way of a lynch, but Day 1 is the best time to do so. If we let this go, there will always be some doubt barring some powers being used. Even more, if we confirm it today, we won't have multiple townies using their powers to confirm Amb/Garou, and they will instead be testing other people. The big difference between the above situation and this one is that the mason claim in GoT was strongly backed by the source material. As someone has pointed out here, there could be a lot of potential "masons." That makes this claim a little more tricky to believe.
Finally, Deception is far from a newbie. We should get that thinking out of our heads right now. He is new to the GL (and therefore less familiar with our collective meta), but he plays a lot on Mafiascum. _________________ Paragon Tally: 18 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ralphmerridew
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 4:58 pm Post subject: 290 |
|
|
I didn't say to treat them as absolutely, totally, 100%, no chance of changing your mind, ever, confirmed.
I said to treat them as significantly more likely to be good than evil, until close to the endgame.
Once a person claims mason, they're locked. They can't change their claim. The mafia might kill an unclaimed mason. Or a cop might investigate one. If the town plays decently, the mafia might find that they'll be outnumbered by the masons and have to kill one. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Garou_Kinfolk
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 5:14 pm Post subject: 291 |
|
|
Here's the two scenarios I believe people see right now.
1: (correct) Amb and I are town. I made a newb mistake of claiming/confirming too early when I read quickly on my break then posting.
2: (incorrect) Amb and I are scum. I made a newb scum mistake on a gambit.
If there is a third choice I can't see it yet.
Here's how I see this being resolved.
1: Lynch a non-mason.
2: Lynch me. Amb is the veteran player and would be more helpful to the town. He gets nk in a night or two because of it. The mafia use a nk earlier on a non-investigative role. I made the mistake and should be the one to go.
3: Lynch Amb. I stay until late game because I am a newb and have a harder time finding scum. _________________ Most posts made from my phone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Tired of his old title
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 5:25 pm Post subject: 292 |
|
|
I worry a little about the source material causing changing alliances, since (I guess, since I don't watch the show) it's pretty common for such things to happen. Otherwise, I agree with rm, we should treat the claimed mason team as town, for now. I'd be quite surprised for scum to make such a gambit (that is, claiming mason) before ever having talked. And if there were such a gambit, it would be more daring players doing it -- say, MNO and me -- than Amb and Garou. ... unless, of course, the mod specifically set them up that way. But I doubt it.
That said, I do believe that there is some reason to doubt them. However, I feel it's overwhelmed by the above reasoning. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 5:41 pm Post subject: 293 |
|
|
| Zag wrote: |
| I'd be quite surprised for scum to make such a gambit (that is, claiming mason) before ever having talked. |
Yeah, this isn't going to fly for me. You know we talked in Sentran's game before the first day, so why are you so certain mafia didn't get to talk in this one? I think it's pretty common practice to let the scum chat during the confirmation phase before the first day.
unvote; vote: Zag I'm not going to let this nonsense continue to be perpetuated, especially by somebody who should know better. He's trying to go along with the crowd, and we are letting him.
| ralphmerridew wrote: |
I said to treat them as significantly more likely to be good than evil, until close to the endgame.
Once a person claims mason, they're locked. They can't change their claim. The mafia might kill an unclaimed mason. Or a cop might investigate one. If the town plays decently, the mafia might find that they'll be outnumbered by the masons and have to kill one. |
This is exactly the problem though: if you wait until endgame, you are waiting until there are more important fish to fry. You don't know what is going to come up between now and then, and I guarantee it will be more than we bargain for. Now is the time to check the claim.
I know they are locked in their claim, but any time somebody claims they are locked in. That doesn't mean there still isn't some investigation to be done. Garou came out as the buddy really quickly here compared to how long he waited in the last game. Plus, I'm pretty sure Amb wasn't in significant danger when he claimed. That's pretty shady. The rest of your list there is a bunch of mights. First, cops don't generally get a role result, so if they investigate an unclaimed mason, they won't know that's who they checked. The mafia might find that, but we might find out the masons were the mafia.
I didn't say I was "absolutely, totally, 100%, no chance of changing your mind, ever," wanting to lynch Amb, by the way. I do think it is worth considering. _________________ Paragon Tally: 18 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 5:52 pm Post subject: 294 |
|
|
For the record, so we can at least discuss accurately, Amb only had three votes on him at the time of the claim (myself, ralphm, Mackay). There had been no significant attention paid to Amb in the intervening pages of that post count, and he dropped the claim as an aside rather than something overt. In addition, Garou claimed one extra vote and less than an hour later.
The devil is in the details... _________________ Paragon Tally: 18 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sentran
Ray of Sucking Funshine
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 6:06 pm Post subject: 295 |
|
|
First off, I would like to point out that Mafia Theory is called such for a reason. It is, by definition, unproven. It's an opinion. Therefore, if two people have a difference in their read of Mafia Theory, it should be expected, not a scumtell. That being said, I agree with almost everything that Jedo has posted today. I was waiting for Zag and Jedo to chime in before I made a vote decision. I am glad that Jedo is starting to see the type of play in Zag that I was, and it makes me feel more justified in my earlier read.
Even so, I will Vote: Amb. After many games in which theory was discussed and debating the subject in my own brain, I realized that Jedo has a valid point that we'd rather lynch a town Mason than to take the chance of lynching a more powerful town role. I feel strongly that Zag is scum, but not enough to chance losing a veteran player on a bad read. I also feel it will provide us with good info, as I've mentioned before.
One last thing, I would like to see less claims on Day 1. Too many claims only serves the scum, not the town. _________________ Sentran
"Speaking of double negatives, I haven't read greylab yet today." - Lifeinmomland |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
itisally
Master of Disguise
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 6:36 pm Post subject: 296 |
|
|
| Jedo wrote: |
| My question: What would cause you to change your mind about these gut reads? At least for the first two, that seems to be a "they fooled me last time, so I won't let them fool me this time" gut reaction. Conscious or otherwise, it's worth considering. I mean, I'm not really helping my case with you because now you will think I'm trying to sway you from your read of me, but maybe you'll at least think about these things. |
It is a viable question and I have been thinking about that. What I really look for once I have a feeling is what that person does from that point which may sway me. The problem is that is has a lot to due with patterns of behavior and attitude. What I can tell you right now is that just by asking a question rather than demanding I see since is a change in behavior from when you were scum and therefore a point in your favor.
On the other hand when you say this
| Quote: |
| Do you people, in all your games of mafia playing, not learn to differentiate scum and town posts/traits? |
You are only inflaming peoples’ tempers and not actually adding helpful content. Eliciting emotions from other players when you haven’t been attacked is a great way to distract people from the truth. When I see this I want to look at what bandwagon is going on and assume you are both scum.
Furthermore, in Sentran’s game we started on Night 0, that is why the scum got to talk. I don’t have a lot of experience playing scum so I can’t speak from that, but this
| Jedo the Jedi wrote: |
| Zag wrote: |
| I'd be quite surprised for scum to make such a gambit (that is, claiming mason) before ever having talked. |
Yeah, this isn't going to fly for me. You know we talked in Sentran's game before the first day, so why are you so certain mafia didn't get to talk in this one? I think it's pretty common practice to let the scum chat during the confirmation phase before the first day. |
Was a clear misrepresentation of the facts. Most games that I have read start in a day phase and I would not assume pre-game talking.
You are correct, however, in noting that Amb was not really under much pressure to claim as attention had shifted from his wagon. He also slipped it in nonchalantly, almost like he hoped no one would notice. I don’t want to lynch there because this early there are better ways to confirm.
All in all, I think we underestimate the power of a voting block late in the game and the power on having a group you know you can trust to bounce ideas off of. It is an exchange of power now or power later, and , as I said, there are other ways to confirm. _________________ I could agree with you, but then we would both be wrong. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Garou_Kinfolk
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 6:38 pm Post subject: 297 |
|
|
@ Jedo: Here is how I KNOW that the scum didn't have time to talk pre-Game.
1: The game started on Day 1.
2: I revived my role pm at 8:31 a.m. local time.
3: Game started an hour later at 9:11a.m. local time.
4: I am 5th on the player list. Logically that means I was 5th to receive my role.
An hour isn't a lot of time for separating, even if everyone was online at the time. _________________ Most posts made from my phone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Garou_Kinfolk
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 7:23 pm Post subject: 298 |
|
|
My last post got me thinking. Why does Jedo think the mafia had time to talk? Then a theory hit me. The mafia were given their roles earlier then everyone else so they could talk. Jedo, if town, would have known there wasn't time to talk since the town received their role P.M.s at about the same time. This is theory, but it fits the facts and tells us why he thinks the mafia had time to talk before the game start.
Unvote. Vote Jedo _________________ Most posts made from my phone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 7:24 pm Post subject: 299 |
|
|
| itisally wrote: |
On the other hand when you say this
| Jedo the Jedi wrote: |
| Do you people, in all your games of mafia playing, not learn to differentiate scum and town posts/traits? |
You are only inflaming peoples’ tempers and not actually adding helpful content. Eliciting emotions from other players when you haven’t been attacked is a great way to distract people from the truth. When I see this I want to look at what bandwagon is going on and assume you are both scum. |
ally, do you understand how infuriating it is to read this
| The Great Crep'er wrote: |
| Deception wrote: |
| Deception wrote: |
| In that case I especially have no problem running you up for death. |
I'll explain this when it is no longer anti-town to do so, if I'm still alive. |
IGMEOY Deception |
and realize that he actually thinks Deception to be more scummy because of that? I'm emotional when people don't play smartly. I'm competitive. I don't like it when people can't tell the difference between a scumtell and an opposing view. So, all I can really say is I'm responding out of my own emotions. If you don't think that's good, at least recognize it for what it is.
To the town at large: If you haven't played as scum, you have to realize that it causes a psychological shift. Every time you attack somebody as scum, you know in your brain that you are lying. Some people can lie very easily like that. I have a hard time with it. The scum also have different/more information than the town, so sometimes they let on that they know more than they should. It's psychological. If you want to jump on Deception or myself for thinking that Amb might should be lynched anyway, you need to realize that is not likely to be a scumtell and look for something else on which to base your vote.
Now then, I will rescind Sentran's game as an example, but it is not uncommon for mods to give the mafia, say 24 hours, to talk during a day start. So, Garou, you don't KNOW the mod didn't do this. If you do, I'm calling you scum.
Finally, I don't underestimate the power of a voting block. I recognize that can be a good thing. I think we had something strong like this going for us in V Mafia. What I don't think you understand, ally, et. al., is we really can't trust the mason claim. It is Day 1, you saw the points I made against the way the claim was made, and it's at least a possibility that even if they didn't discuss it beforehand, they can at least have done it on the fly. Garou was a mason last game, and he saw how easily it went for those masons (how the town eventually chose just to believe the claim). He could have taken the risk believing it would be the same here---and it is! It is neither confirmed nor denied, so let's not swallow everything whole. _________________ Paragon Tally: 18 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 7:29 pm Post subject: 300 |
|
|
| Garou_Kinfolk wrote: |
My last post got me thinking. Why does Jedo think the mafia had time to talk? Then a theory hit me. The mafia were given their roles earlier then everyone else so they could talk. Jedo, if town, would have known there wasn't time to talk since the town received their role P.M.s at about the same time. This is theory, but it fits the facts and tells us why he thinks the mafia had time to talk before the game start.
Unvote. Vote Jedo |
*sigh* _________________ Paragon Tally: 18 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Garou_Kinfolk
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 7:47 pm Post subject: 301 |
|
|
Your right Jedo, but only about my last point. Everything else is fact. All any townie has to do to confirm my theory for themselves is to look at when they received their own role p.m. in relation to when the game started. _________________ Most posts made from my phone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Amb
Amb the Hitched.
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 8:09 pm Post subject: 302 |
|
|
| Sentran wrote: |
Even so, I will Vote: Amb. After many games in which theory was discussed and debating the subject in my own brain, I realized that Jedo has a valid point that we'd rather lynch a town Mason than to take the chance of lynching a more powerful town role
|
First: I believe MNO's inconsistent ramblings are that of scum.
Second: I let out my role of Mason, in the hopes that anyone using the logic above could then, on my death, would look hard at MNO.
Third:Whoops, Garou wasn't supposed to admit himself. I even sent him the quote where I encrypted his name so he could prove himself mason later after my death. (Yes, us masons are allowed to chat during the day)
Fourth: I generally agree with the logic above, but I often die for pushing No Lynch which isn't that different.
So to disagree with myself, for the sake of it: If you do proceed to lynch me - I completely understand. But be aware, that by lynching me you remove any chance of reducing scum by 100%. Yes you could lynch a cop or a doc. So the sum of info you will gain is that Garou is cleared. And that on day 1 makes him a scum target. He won't survive the entire game. The only advantage there is that they have to waste a kill on him while other roles skulk in the shadows.
I know there are those who won't believe a mason claim. But that is the hardest of all claims in the universe to fake. That is probably the only thing that might keep me alive day 1.
Now to address JTJ on this:
| Quote: |
Now then, I will rescind Sentran's game as an example, but it is not uncommon for mods to give the mafia, say 24 hours, to talk during a day start. So, Garou, you don't KNOW the mod didn't do this. If you do, I'm calling you scum.
|
As already stated, we masons can talk during the day. There is no reason to assume the scum cannot do the same. I would wonder if scum didn't think through the possibility of town doing this, and thus JTJ's argument is slightly postured and framing. I'm not sold on this, because a vanilla town would also come from this perspective. But it's worth noting.
I do also note that Garou in his post kind of baited JTJ with his statement: "Then a theory hit me. The mafia were given their roles earlier then everyone else so they could talk. " and "Here is how I KNOW that the scum didn't have time to talk pre-Game. " Unfortunately Garou hasn't taken his own role into account here. That's also probably bad for my survival.
So I don't know what to make of JTJ or where to stand. He could be town and he could be scum. I still think MNO's behaviour is much more blatant. He actually deserves to swing. Would he be that blatant if he was a cop or a doc? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Amb
Amb the Hitched.
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 8:16 pm Post subject: 303 |
|
|
In fighting masons. Great.
| Quote: |
1: The game started on Day 1.
2: I revived my role pm at 8:31 a.m. local time.
3: Game started an hour later at 9:11a.m. local time.
4: I am 5th on the player list. Logically that means I was 5th to receive my role.
|
Speaking as a mod, this is ridiculous. The order of the list has nothing to do with the order recieved by/sent to players. Garou, in my last game that I modded you were the GodFather, and you got given PM's at least 24-48 hours to discuss your role. I really don't think you can base anything on this for this reason as well. I can understand you might think JTJ is scum, but the reasoning just isn't sound. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Garou_Kinfolk
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 8:37 pm Post subject: 304 |
|
|
I guess all I can say at this point is lynch the non-vet mason (me) so the town has a confirmed vet it can look to for opinions. I shouldn't have to tell any of you that this is better then lynching a vet and having a confirmed town newb. Worst case scenario, you lynch Amb tomorrow for being scum. I'm going to sign off now and take a breather. _________________ Most posts made from my phone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 9:00 pm Post subject: 305 |
|
|
| Amb wrote: |
In fighting masons. Great.
| Quote: |
1: The game started on Day 1.
2: I revived my role pm at 8:31 a.m. local time.
3: Game started an hour later at 9:11a.m. local time.
4: I am 5th on the player list. Logically that means I was 5th to receive my role.
|
Speaking as a mod, this is ridiculous. The order of the list has nothing to do with the order recieved by/sent to players. Garou, in my last game that I modded you were the GodFather, and you got given PM's at least 24-48 hours to discuss your role. I really don't think you can base anything on this for this reason as well. I can understand you might think JTJ is scum, but the reasoning just isn't sound. |
You mean to tell me your game started with Day and the mafia had a chance to talk before that started? The very thing I was pointing out to counter Zag's statement? And Garou is voting me because of it? Oh. My. God.
Amb, why is a mason claim "the hardest of all claims in the universe to fake"? I mean, they don't have to keep producing any results, and they get to talk at night just like the scum. In fact, judging by the tone of the town, I would say you wouldn't even have to worry much about being investigated. Seems pretty easy to me.
And just one more point to show how we should respond to setups: I have never before the last game seen day-talking masons. Ever. That's 10 years of no day-talking masons. Now it happens two games in a row? Notice I'm not coming down on either of you for suggesting what to me should be an outlandish thing. The fact is, it has happened, so it isn't beyond the realm of possibility...AND I'M NOT THE MOD.
All that being said, stop nit-picking details. I actually think ally and Garou/Amb are more scummy now for trying to browbeat me over a detail when my intent was correct all along. _________________ Paragon Tally: 18 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Amb
Amb the Hitched.
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 9:22 pm Post subject: 306 |
|
|
| Jedo, I think you've missed my point. I'm trying to quash Garou's argument because it is faulty. His role should tend toward the opposite conclusion to what he made. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
itisally
Master of Disguise
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 10:52 pm Post subject: 307 |
|
|
It is funny to me that you feel browbeaten, Jedo. When I read back over my post to you earlier I clearly pointed out two good things (a reasonable question and a good observation) and two bad things (inflaming tempers to no end and misrepresenting facts). Seems like people could read that either way. Defensive much.
Amb seems to be agreeing with you for the most part and you are trying to string him up. Sentran agrees with you. I happen to think the masons are worth waiting on and giving the cop a chance to do thier job.
I have never read about Mafia successfully pulling off a mason gambit (I could be wrong. I am limited in my reading). Based on this experiance it is more likely that Amb and Garou are telling the truth. Therefore, I am more likely to catch scum if I vote for MNOWAX or Jedo or Deception (or anyone really).
The people on MNOWAX are voting for him because he is eratic. MNOWAX is always eratic. MNOWAX is not always scum therefore this is not a scum tell in that player. (and yes I think they can be pretty player specific).
I want to give Deception a chance, After getting Lynched several times for play style and coming up town one would either stop playing or move to a cite where they felt more welcome. (read as I may be gullible because I am not confident that this is change on the side of good)
As for Zag not being subltle enough to be mafia, I couldn't say. He is an images in the fog person for me. He sees that patterns (even as scum) and I am just jumping at shadows. _________________ I could agree with you, but then we would both be wrong. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Tired of his old title
|
Posted: Mon Jun 25, 2012 11:25 pm Post subject: 308 |
|
|
itisally, it's way easier to see patterns when you're scum, because you know what result you want to end up with. It's like being a Republican.
When you actually don't know what answer you want, it's harder. Frankly, the only pattern I see right now is Jedo working rather hard to misrepresent my words. With every post of his, I find him more scummy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Deception
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 12:05 am Post subject: 309 |
|
|
| ralphmerridew wrote: |
Deception's response was to insult me. That puts him in jerk territory.
Next, as far as masons go:
When somebody makes an uncontested mason claim (barring scenarios when you're close to endgame), you unvote them. Period.
A bunch of masons in the late game are extraordinarily powerful. The mafia simply can't let that happen. Sooner or later, they must kill the masons. And when they do, the rest of them will be confirmed.
Make the mafia use their kill to get rid of the masons. I'd expect bad play of that form from a relative newbie like Deception, but I expect better of Jedo. Vote: Jedo |
Yeah I'm a jerk.. and jadesmar called me scum in real life. Good to see that you're actually just oversensitive and not worried about what is or isn't rude/okay.
attention: if you call me anything other than "aidjoewbrwsdfadsuytertrhfsrhfgadgffsgjiloxzdfgdsgdfssesawe" (with quotation marks included) I will take it as a very personal insult and an attack on my integrity and will be very upset. Please respect my name and don't make me ask twice. There is no abbreviation.
Also you're nuts if you think for a second the mafia are going to shoot a mason over an actual powerrole. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Great Crep'er
2% Spambot
|
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 12:10 am Post subject: 310 |
|
|
| Deception wrote: |
Also you're nuts if you think for a second the mafia are going to shoot a mason over an actual powerrole. |
Masons are technically power roles (they have the ability to confer outside this thread, which many do not have) so your statement is a bit contradictory here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Deception
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 12:14 am Post subject: 311 |
|
|
Vote Amb I think we can actually get this lynch - the claims honestly do look fake to me. Too quick, looks too orchestrated. Like Amb wanted an excuse to claim and Garou was waiting to claim as well. Last game we said we wouldn't lynch claimed masons day 1 because "what are the odds". It's not too hard to think Amb/Garou as scum saw that and went "we could use this" this game.
Also Great Crep'er: Semantics. How about he's nuts if he thinks that mafia are going to shoot a mason over a role that has a night action that could actively hurt scums' chances of winning - like a cop or vigilante. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Great Crep'er
2% Spambot
|
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 12:31 am Post subject: 312 |
|
|
| That remains to be seen though. It almost seems as if you're voting them over events that haven't even happened yet. We can't infer who might be a cop or vig role because no one (to my knowledge, maybe someone else's) has softclaimed yet, and we can't even highlight said possible "cop or vig" traits because it would be damaging to town if we did. There's a chance that scum aren't as crazy and thoughtless to expose their connection this early in the game and, essentially, ending it (whether it be today or three day phases from now). So why not take it? We can exercise both options that way, by keeping a possible threat to mafia alive, and eventually (provided the masons survive the next few nights and aren't confirmed or towntold by other powerroles) lynch Amb and Garou later on when we have virtually no other options. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jadesmar
Bad Puppy
|
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 12:41 am Post subject: 313 |
|
|
| Deception wrote: |
| ralphmerridew wrote: |
Deception's response was to insult me. That puts him in jerk territory.
Next, as far as masons go:
When somebody makes an uncontested mason claim (barring scenarios when you're close to endgame), you unvote them. Period.
A bunch of masons in the late game are extraordinarily powerful. The mafia simply can't let that happen. Sooner or later, they must kill the masons. And when they do, the rest of them will be confirmed.
Make the mafia use their kill to get rid of the masons. I'd expect bad play of that form from a relative newbie like Deception, but I expect better of Jedo. Vote: Jedo |
Yeah I'm a jerk.. and jadesmar called me scum in real life. Good to see that you're actually just oversensitive and not worried about what is or isn't rude/okay.
attention: if you call me anything other than "aidjoewbrwsdfadsuytertrhfsrhfgadgffsgjiloxzdfgdsgdfssesawe" (with quotation marks included) I will take it as a very personal insult and an attack on my integrity and will be very upset. Please respect my name and don't make me ask twice. There is no abbreviation.
Also you're nuts if you think for a second the mafia are going to shoot a mason over an actual powerrole. |
You said this beside the point stuff actually raised my chance of being mafia, and yet you persist in it.
I don't want to lynch a member of the masons especially given that another mason came to his defense. We have time to do that later.
I'd rather concentrate on why Jedo, Deception and MNOWAX seem to be putting up a concentrated effort in this game. With each coming to the defense of the other. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Deception
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 12:44 am Post subject: 314 |
|
|
| jadesmar wrote: |
I'd rather concentrate on why Jedo, Deception and MNOWAX seem to be putting up a concentrated effort in this game. With each coming to the defense of the other. |
Get my name right, you don't know how it is to have a name people mispronounce 99% of the time. Stop intentionally being a jerk.
The Great Crep'er: If they shoot a mason there's a zero chance of hitting a cop or something. If they shoot anyone else, there's at least a theoretical chance of doing so. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jadesmar
Bad Puppy
|
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 12:45 am Post subject: 315 |
|
|
| Deception wrote: |
| jadesmar wrote: |
I'd rather concentrate on why Jedo, Deception and MNOWAX seem to be putting up a concentrated effort in this game. With each coming to the defense of the other. |
Get my name right, you don't know how it is to have a name people mispronounce 99% of the time. Stop intentionally being a jerk. |
More mafia points for you I guess. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jadesmar
Bad Puppy
|
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 12:49 am Post subject: 316 |
|
|
| Deception wrote: |
| The Great Crep'er: If they shoot a mason there's a zero chance of hitting a cop or something. If they shoot anyone else, there's at least a theoretical chance of doing so. |
If we lynch Amb and he's a mason, the mafia have a non-zero chance of hitting a confirmed townie by killing Garou at any time. Confirmed townie can be a strong role, especially given that there may or may not be another mason. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 1:53 am Post subject: 317 |
|
|
| Amb wrote: |
| Jedo, I think you've missed my point. I'm trying to quash Garou's argument because it is faulty. His role should tend toward the opposite conclusion to what he made. |
I didn't; I just wasn't clear in my post. Most of that was against Garou when he should have known better. I only included you at the end because you and he are essentially a single entity now--your alignments are tied.
| Zag wrote: |
| Frankly, the only pattern I see right now is Jedo working rather hard to misrepresent my words. |
Let's have those concrete examples.
Deception, just drop the name stuff. You are the one keeping it at the fore now.
| jadesmar wrote: |
| I'd rather concentrate on why Jedo, Deception and MNOWAX seem to be putting up a concentrated effort in this game. With each coming to the defense of the other. |
Where are these defenses (only the ones I made is fine)? I gave an alternate suggestion of why MNO was being quiet, and I've said Deception is not a n00b. The latter was actually the opposite of a defense.
The thing is the mafia can't really target the remaining mason for a while (if the claim is true) because any self-respecting doc will protect the known townie. Until another PR turns up, the mafia will have to shoot in the dark. The town's odds are even better if there are three masons. I'm really okay with this scenario. _________________ Paragon Tally: 18 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jadesmar
Bad Puppy
|
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 1:59 am Post subject: 318 |
|
|
| Jedo the Jedi wrote: |
| The thing is the mafia can't really target the remaining mason for a while (if the claim is true) because any self-respecting doc will protect the known townie. Until another PR turns up, the mafia will have to shoot in the dark. The town's odds are even better if there are three masons. I'm really okay with this scenario. |
I'll find quotes in a bit.. I want to talk about this bit.
This is really the definition of a WIFOM, is it not?
We know that in going after the known townie, the mafia would be risking a doctor's defense, we also know that they would rather hit a doc or cop. Would a self-respecting doc protect the known townie. Given that the doc thinks that the mafia would not attack the known townie because he'll be protected by a doc and that they'll go after the cop or doc? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jadesmar
Bad Puppy
|
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 2:02 am Post subject: 319 |
|
|
| Also, I didn't say defences, I said "Concentrated effort" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jadesmar
Bad Puppy
|
Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 2:03 am Post subject: 320 |
|
|
Ok, I said defences.
I'm a little drunk.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|