| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| What would you rather do? |
| Go to an advertised singles website |
|
22% |
[ 2 ] |
| Purchase medications advertised online |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Start a career working from the computer |
|
33% |
[ 3 ] |
| Lend money to a nigerian prince |
|
33% |
[ 3 ] |
| Repost this to keep a girl, murdered in 1993, at bay |
|
11% |
[ 1 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 9 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
 Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 6:51 pm Post subject: 41 |
 |
|
Cryptic
_________________
Paragon Tally: 18 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Suspence
Daedalian Member
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 7:13 pm Post subject: 42 |
|
|
abcegkmqsw
_________________
I hate people who try to write interesting things in their signature. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Thok
Oh, foe, the cursed teeth!
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 26, 2012 11:10 pm Post subject: 43 |
|
|
| Yo pop? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Suspence
Daedalian Member
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2012 9:02 pm Post subject: 44 |
|
|
BUMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMP
_________________
I hate people who try to write interesting things in their signature.
Last edited by Suspence on Mon Jul 02, 2012 11:45 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
The Great Crep'er
2% Spambot
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2012 11:19 pm Post subject: 45 |
|
|
Blah, Suspence those margins are quite unattractive.
Was waiting patiently to get to another six posts before doing another analysis. (Routine, and all)
Spam percentage for post 39: 100%
Spam percentage for post 40: 35%
Spam percentage for post 41: 29%
Spam percentage for post 42: 100%
Spam percentage for post 43: 0%
Spam percentage for post 44 (Butt ugly post): 97%
Looking better everyday! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
raekuul
Lives under a bridge & tells stories.
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2012 11:28 pm Post subject: 46 |
|
|
| I bet I could post the entirety of "Green Eggs And Ham" and get a Spam Ratio of somewhere in the 66% range. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Suspence
Daedalian Member
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2012 11:38 pm Post subject: 47 |
|
|
dfhijlnoprtuvxyz
_________________
I hate people who try to write interesting things in their signature. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Suspence
Daedalian Member
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2012 11:40 pm Post subject: 48 |
|
|
Letters that correspond to prime numbers are spam???
_________________
I hate people who try to write interesting things in their signature. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
The Great Crep'er
2% Spambot
|
| Posted: Mon Jul 02, 2012 11:52 pm Post subject: 49 |
|
|
| Suspence wrote: |
| Letters that correspond to prime numbers are spam??? |
YES! DING DING DING DING DING!
Well...for this thread anyways. 
Congratulations to Suspence! You are a spammer! And with that, the first game of Spam Percentages is brought to a swift and dutiful close.
Was it simplistic for a spam rule? Maybe, but, this game was the first of its brand. There is always room down the line for improvement. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Suspence
Daedalian Member
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2012 12:27 am Post subject: 50 |
|
|
Nice one. So, should I take over and define my own rule? In this thread or a new one?
_________________
I hate people who try to write interesting things in their signature. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
The Great Crep'er
2% Spambot
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2012 12:41 am Post subject: 51 |
|
|
| Suspence wrote: |
| Nice one. So, should I take over and define my own rule? In this thread or a new one? |
If you want to start your own, I can edit the title and we can start from here if you want.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dread Pirate Westley
Daedalian Member
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2012 3:07 am Post subject: 52 |
|
|
Not quite.
Letters that correspond to prime numbers, and the letter a, are spam. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Loneliest*
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2012 3:16 am Post subject: 53 |
|
|
| Dread Pirate Westley wrote: |
Not quite.
Letters that correspond to prime numbers, and the letter a, are spam. |
1's factors are 1 and itself... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MatthewV
Daedalian Member :_
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2012 4:17 am Post subject: 54 |
|
|
| Suspence wrote: |
| Nice one. So, should I take over and define my own rule? In this thread or a new one? |
When the Cauldron games were going, they usually were created in new threads. It usually works better then keeping one thread alive. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
novice
No harm. Pun intended!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Loneliest*
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2012 8:15 am Post subject: 56 |
|
|
It's nice to know that some of you take full enough stock in Wikipedia to take information written there as truth.
It has been a historically accepted definition that 1 is a prime number, if you choose to believe differently, that's your choice. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Thok
Oh, foe, the cursed teeth!
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2012 10:26 am Post subject: 57 |
|
|
| Loneliest* wrote: |
| It has been a historically accepted definition that 1 is a prime number, if you choose to believe differently, that's your choice. |
Modern mathematicians don't consider 1 a prime number, since there are fairly important things that don't work if 1 is prime. (For example, the ring Z/1Z isn't a field in a way that allows for interesting linear algebra, while Z/pZ is a field for every prime number. Also, uniqueness of prime factorization effectively falls apart if 1 is a prime.)
1 is properly considered a unit, rather than being prime or composite. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
novice
No harm. Pun intended!
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2012 10:34 am Post subject: 58 |
|
|
| Loneliest* wrote: |
| It's nice to know that some of you take full enough stock in Wikipedia to take information written there as truth. |
I'm inclined to trust Wikipedia, especially when it confirms what I already know. You could check that article's references if you don't trust it.
| Loneliest* wrote: |
| It has been a historically accepted definition that 1 is a prime number, if you choose to believe differently, that's your choice. |
What an odd thing to frame as a question of belief.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
L'lanmal
Daedalian Member
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 03, 2012 11:11 am Post subject: 59 |
|
|
If you define 1 to be a prime number, then the Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic is false. (That is, no positive integer would have a unique prime factorization.)
You could, of course, restate the Fundamental Theorem to only involve primes other than one. However, as factorization is my main use for the definition of a prime number, I would find this most inconvenient. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
referee
June 21st, 2004 Member
|
| Posted: Wed Jul 04, 2012 4:51 am Post subject: 60 |
|
|
1 as a prime? gah! My eyes. My poor punished eyes.
I declare this game void on account of a form defect.
_________________
Jan 21st, 2008: The pillaging continues.
Mar 4th, 2008: Rest in Peace, Gary Gygax. May your dice always roll a natural 20 wherever you are.
Be the Ultimate Ninja! Play Billy Vs. SNAKEMAN today! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
