|
|
|
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Mackay
Saviour of Spiders
|
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 6:40 am Post subject: 1081 |
|
|
| Hey, does anyone know if MNOWAX is a fan of the Survivor TV show? Like, from other Survivor-styled games or anything? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Amb
Amb the Hitched.
|
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:23 am Post subject: 1082 |
|
|
| I assume you mean anyone other than me. But yes, I think he is. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mackay
Saviour of Spiders
|
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:36 am Post subject: 1083 |
|
|
Why would I exclude you from the question? Actually, I wanted your feedback earlier about potential mafia members, because I can't figure out who would be in an alliance with Russell and Parvati. Any thoughts?
I was just wondering about MNOWAX's claim that he had a partner with the role of Rudy Boesch (I'd forgotten all about it till I read his posts). If he wasn't a Survivor fan it would be more likely that the cult started with two people. Thanks for the info! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Elethiomel
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:40 am Post subject: 1084 |
|
|
MNOWAX actually posted this two days ago, in the top GL'er thread:
| MNOWAX wrote: |
| Zag wrote: |
Constructing them -- It's patterned after the Top Chef competitions.
. |
oh before i forget, this year, its patterned more towards project runway (in that any challenge can send you home) and Masterchef (in that more than one person can go home on any challenge)
man, I don't know how i noticed this, but I have become a reality competition junkie. *looks for a rope* |
About Amb, here's something he posted in the middle of day 3, after Zag and Deception had been going at each other the whole day (post 779 if you want the full context):
| Amb wrote: |
| My take on Zag and Deception - which I gave a lot of thought to. They are masons. They have been put together as a tribe would be constructed on the show. Ie they claimed Ogakor members from the same tribe. That's either really bad lying, or they really are who they claim. Maybe that's designed to make them wary of each other. Either way the town needed something to keep cult, SK & mafia at bay - and two mini mason groups seems the best balance to me. We had a cop and a roleblocker too. I'd bet bottom dollar we have a back up cop (and they need to stay silent to make sure they survive) and they might be our best bet of finding cultist(s). |
It seemed bizarre to reach this conclusion, even after thinking about it a lot, so I immediately replied:
| Elethiomel wrote: |
| May I remind you that Deception claims they could talk pregame, while Zag claims they could not. At least one of them is scum - there is no way around that. |
To which he replied:
| Amb wrote: |
This is true.
THis is spinning around my head so much. What I posted before cannot possibly be correct actually (about Zag and Deception) because it violates occams razor. THe simplest explaination is that one of them must be scum. The entire argument rises from the fact that I think I have pre-decided on who 2 scum are, and in reality I don't know for either. I was so sure. Aaargh. I have to actually step back because I'm not sleeping for thinking about combinations and trying to second guess UM. |
So in short, he tried floating the idea that Deception and Zag could both be innocent, then backed down and eventually lynched Deception. But after Deception flipped innocent, he has apparently not suspected Zag at all. Why not, if he agreed with the premise that one of the two must be scum?
On a different tangent, it's also strange (and a strange coincidence) that Amb was so confident that we'd have a backup cop.
If we are to lynch people in strict order of scumminess, I would still go for Zag. But I agree that it could be nice to confirm Captin Aniima's results by lynching Amb. Problem is, she could be a mafia investigator (or she could even be mafia who is simply guessing correctly that Amb is cult). The only real way to confirm Aniima's results is to lynch her. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Amb
Amb the Hitched.
|
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:40 am Post subject: 1085 |
|
|
| Quote: |
| I think that if Amb hadn't treated Aniima's cop result as fact, I still would. |
The only reason I don't argue against the claim, is because instead of dying gracefully tomorrow, I'll go out with a bang fighting Aniima and still die anyway. So even if I don't agree with the 'results' published, I can't do much anyway. So I may as well do what I can to try dig up something... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Captin Aniima
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 9:25 am Post subject: 1086 |
|
|
Amv I don't understand why you would want me to investigate you a second time. Could you explain this theory to me?
Also I want to know why to me it sounds that Zag is thrilled to have a chance to lynch me.
Why do I have to be lynched? Im town so lynching me would only dwindle the numbers on top of that the cult recruits people right? So by the time we get to the day you say we will win it's more likely that town will lose and cult will win.
It makes me wonder if when you say "we will win!" you are actually talking about the cult.
Vote: Zag Your pro-town façade doesn't fool me. _________________ Just sayin... The sky is blue. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Elethiomel
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 9:50 am Post subject: 1087 |
|
|
| Mackay, why did you protect MNOWAX on night 1? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mackay
Saviour of Spiders
|
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 10:00 am Post subject: 1088 |
|
|
| Jedo1 wrote: |
| Sentran wrote: |
| My other growing concern is that MNO is uncharacteristically quiet. As a town player he is always loud and random, and only as a scum has he been quiet and reserved, in my experience. |
There's an exception to this.
<snip>
|
| Jedo1 wrote: |
<snip>
Page 6: More lurker lynch stuff. I already made my comments generally. I will say I don't find MNO to be particularly scummy right now. I made a comment earlier referencing his quietness. He has been quiet when he has a significant town power and doesn't want attention. I was hoping not to be explicit about this. Still, it's not a free pass. I think jadesmar is still neutral (and snarky). A couple of quotes.
<snip>
|
Not being as familiar with MNOWAX as Jedo is (and Jedo made lot of assertions about his familiarity with how things "normally" go on day 1), I took this to heart. I figured that if it was good enough to make him go quiet in a game where everyone had a power, it was good enough for me to protect. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Elethiomel
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 10:06 am Post subject: 1089 |
|
|
| Ok, that makes sense. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot
|
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 11:08 am Post subject: 1090 |
|
|
Could we get an official vote count? _________________
| Death Mage wrote: |
| I couldn't agree with you more, Zag. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mackay
Saviour of Spiders
|
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 11:34 am Post subject: 1091 |
|
|
Aniima, I've got to ask. Admittedly my vote for Amb is based just as much on his reaction to your claimed results as it is to said 'results', but I'm still kind of surprised you are not voting for him. You just claimed to have a probable cult lead on the guy.
Is it only Zag's eagerness to get two lynches between now and a future Amb lynch that puts him higher on your list? Because that seems to hint at a connection between the two anyway. Is it because of his insistence that you are a necessary lynch? Because you seemed happy to 'take one for the team' earlier this game day - though admittedly, the threat of a cult just became a lot scarier with a probable two members out there, and possibly more, so I can understand a change of tune on that front.
I mean, I'll cooperate with a Zag lynch. It's obvious that I believe Zag is cult too. If you and Eleth are pretty solidly set on it I will join you with my vote. But I've already been burned once by Deception. I'd rather go with the person that you are claiming an actual result on. That also helps us narrow your role down, to "cop or cult" vs "scum", depending on how Amb flips. A Zag lynch doesn't grant the town nearly as much information, and in the improbable-but-not-impossible case of an Aniima/Amb cult pair it potentially dooms the town.
I'd also like to know why, when you posted your list of suspects yesterday, your "pro-town" list included Elethiomel along with the people you claimed innocent results for? It seems like a bad idea for a cop to include someone they haven't investigated in a list they are likely leaving behind for the town to check if/when they die, and everyone else (well, except the dead one) to whom you assigned an alignment was someone you claim to have investigated.
I think I will have more thoughts about potential remaining mafia members when Jedo gets back and completes the picture with regard to what claims we're working with. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot
|
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 1:41 pm Post subject: 1092 |
|
|
I am willing to lynch Capt A before Mackay, because I think both their claims are bogus and they are both scum. I am not willing to lynch the confirmed townie Amb first, even if I believed for sure that he is MNO's cultist recruit. If the cultist can still recruit, they would have already won; as long as he can't, we should wait to get him (If it IS he) until the scum are gone. We don't face night kills with a cultist.
In any case, I suspect that the cute accusation of Amb is just a ploy set up by the scum duo to push the lynch away from them. With one more night, we're at lynch or lose. If Capt A has guessed right and Amb is the cultist, then she and Mackay will claim a pro-town victory in rooting out the cultist, when really it's a pro-scum victory in arriving at lynch or lose. If she guessed wrong, you know that Mackay will try to point you back to me.
Let me say it more clearly: Even if Amb were to admit in the thread that he's the cultist, lynching him now would be a mistake. We have to find the scum, first. Pick one you think is scum, and vote for that person. _________________
| Death Mage wrote: |
| I couldn't agree with you more, Zag. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mackay
Saviour of Spiders
|
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 3:18 pm Post subject: 1093 |
|
|
| Zag wrote: |
I am willing to lynch Capt A before Mackay, because I think both their claims are bogus and they are both scum. I am not willing to lynch the confirmed townie Amb first, even if I believed for sure that he is MNO's cultist recruit. If the cultist can still recruit, they would have already won; as long as he can't, we should wait to get him (If it IS he) until the scum are gone. We don't face night kills with a cultist.
In any case, I suspect that the cute accusation of Amb is just a ploy set up by the scum duo to push the lynch away from them. With one more night, we're at lynch or lose. If Capt A has guessed right and Amb is the cultist, then she and Mackay will claim a pro-town victory in rooting out the cultist, when really it's a pro-scum victory in arriving at lynch or lose. If she guessed wrong, you know that Mackay will try to point you back to me.
Let me say it more clearly: Even if Amb were to admit in the thread that he's the cultist, lynching him now would be a mistake. We have to find the scum, first. Pick one you think is scum, and vote for that person. |
It is quite unlike you to completely dismiss all possibilities other than "there is one cultist left" and "cult successfully recruited every night". That is a poor attempt a false dichotomy, and it's not even particularly well-disguised. Especially given that you suddenly decided there must be two mafia left after I pointed out that the evidence points toward multiple cultists. You, on the other hand, have no evidence, just flimsy hypotheticals that conveniently assume all the conditions that suit your case.
Here are some possibilities you conveniently neglected to consider:
- Cult being roleblocked by LIML on either of the first two nights
- Certain roles being unrecruitable (also, cult dying when they attempt to recruit mafia, though the lack of cultist nightdeaths suggests that this has, unfortunately, not occurred)
- Cult only recruits every other night
- Cult having only a certain % chance of recruiting (especially with Hatch dead) (Actually, I really like "failure chance x% once Hatch dies" as a mechanic!)
Let me be clear, Zag. If there are multiple cultists, then we do not have one day to spare. We can't rely on another doc save as I'm likely doomed tonight, failing a successful Creper redirection (Let me take this opportunity to beg mafia to target probable cultists). Even with two cultists, one recruitment puts the cult in the position to deadlock the town and probably hands them the win. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mackay
Saviour of Spiders
|
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 3:48 pm Post subject: 1094 |
|
|
Hey Zag, wasn't your entire case against me a couple of innocuous posts that even inexplicably-desperate-for-my-blood Amb didn't get behind, and
| Zag wrote: |
Here's what I got from your post, Mackay:
"...interesting.
blah, blah, blah. Something about Jeff...
I, Mackay, am the last scum. I didn't kill at all last night because I knew I'd end up killing myself.
blah, blah, blah"
Vote: Mackay |
?
Now that you've decided there are two scum, why am I still one of them, considering your explanation for the lack of a nightkill?
If you believe that there are two mafia and I am one of them, why was there no kill? What stopped the kill from occurring? I appear to be the only doctor. The town roleblocker is dead.
If you believe two mafia remain, why aren't you trying to convince me, as the most likely innocent in that scenario? Why aren't you trying to convince anyone?! (You've also accused Eleth and Aniima of being scum today. Anyone but Amb, I guess.)
If you actually believe that I am mafia, then why are you OK with lynching anyone else when the idea of my having a partner, with the way the game has played out today, defies all sense of rational gameplay?
The answer to all of these is, of course, that you don't believe a thing you are saying. You have no convictions. You are just desperate to get to tomorrow with you and Amb both alive so you can steal the game. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 4:03 pm Post subject: 1095 |
|
|
Boy, howdy! What a slog! I will present my reading of the past couple game days in rapid fire mostly, then I will post again with my thoughts on the most recent developments.
First of all, my trite and condescending remarks about how it is a wonder you guys made good decisions with all of the crap you guys were bogged down with in your attention.
| The Great Crep'er, post 904 wrote: |
| He is an odd duck to me...stating that it was merely a Deception-esque style of play he was taking on and that he was not in fact scum. Turned out to be true. Either a good judge of character or a baddy looking to get town points in...he stayed hard on the course for lynching rm, stating with vehemence that his non-active behavior was scummy...And, lo and behold, he was right! How did he manage that so effectively? How was he so sure and so correct? |
This was a purely personal thing I wanted to address: I just have a knack for certain people, though it really isn't 100% as you see with Sentran this game. Just ask Amb about Sopranos, Sentran in Mom's first game, and bgg in V Mafia. Some people I can peg really well. Don't expect it any more this game. (I totally would have disagreed with you on Aniima at that point; I'm not really sure on her right now.)
-------------------
The next few quotes revolve around TGC's plan to puppeteer Sentran. My overall statement about TGC's lying--Shocker![/sarcasm]--and his plan is that it read genuine even though I believed it to be really stupid on both parts. My big argument against the plan--though I'll point out others as I go--is that there was not a similarly obvious lynch candidate. If we're going to crap-shoot with the lynch anyway, we can just as well lynch Sentran and crap-shoot with the power overnight. (It's behind us now, but I thought it would be good to share my thoughts in case somebody might find it beneficial to have another insight.)
| Mackay, post 908 wrote: |
| But why do you claim that is going to work? SURELY, given that you have laid out your alleged plan in the open, the mafia wouldn't send Sentran to do the kills unless he is the only one left. You handwaved this away earlier, and I'd like a decent response. If you are telling the truth about your ability it makes more sense to lynch Sentran, because if he is mafia and he IS the only one left that is a win for us. If you're telling the truth we should use your power as a cop investigation instead, and have a chance at turning someone else's kill against themselves while lynching a suspected mafia. The plan you have laid out both makes no sense as a pro-town course of action, and requires us to trust you. I can't go along with it. |
Good rebuttal. The rest of the post was also a good meta-argument for why lying as town is bad policy.
Zag's 909 where he supports TGC's plan is rife with bad logical leaps, and it is surprising for Zag. I think Eleth made a similar remark later on. This is something that causes me to go back to suspecting Zag. Zag +1
| Mackay, post 910 wrote: |
Here's what I'm starting to think about. If TGC and Sentran are mafia together:
- It is in their best interest to keep Sentran alive for an additional day, for obvious reasons.
- Bussing Sentran helps TGC "prove" his innocence, once the town gets tired of obeying TGC and not lynching him.
- They can kill tonight and claim that it was performed by someone other than Sentran, or they can no-kill in order to further fortify TGC's claim - either way leaves the town in the same position information-wise, but at a bigger disadvantage. |
The last point is especially a reason why this plan should never have been considered: TGC is not cleared town by any means.
| Mackay, post 918 wrote: |
| You know what kills mafia? LYNCHING. |
The rest of the post has other good points and rebuttals, but this one just stands out as really good.
TGC's 919 had some horribly misguided points in it that made just as bad rebuttals. A few salient points:
| The Great Crep'er, post 919 wrote: |
| 1)...my goal was to mislead the mafia. That was my intent. If a deceived town happens to be a byproduct, well that's just too bad...2) When I say "deceivers" I mean people who intentionally deceive like MNOWAX. When I say liars, I mean people like myself who skew the truth or omit truths...3) If we hit mafia, we're that much closer to one mafia. With your option, it is passing up the golden opportunity of a DOUBLE KILL power for the town in the terms of a public forum lynch, which town would have to do later on anyways if Sent were not the only baddy out there. If Sent is lynched, and is not the only one, you've effectively thrown me away (nothing short of a lucky break could get me to redirect the mafia kill again) and partly sabotaged the town. My power is something that would result in not only a failed mafia kill but a dead mafia the next night. (If it works out) |
1) I understand that was your intent, but if you are misleading mafia who have more information already, you are always going to be misleading town along with them. That isn't good team play.
2) This is a poor distinction. You actively told us something that doesn't exist, so that is hardly a lie by omission. I think, as a vig, withholding the fact that you have multiple kills instead of one is a good thing to do because that information really only helps scum to know. You didn't do that. This is a conversation about game theory, but I went to the grave as a cop because I don't believe my power is a lynch-pin for the town to win. We are doing well without Jedo1's cop power, and I think you should have been willing to do the same instead of leading us on to outing so many other roles on Day 1.
3) This is a false dichotomy, though I think I've already answered this above in my opening remarks about this section.
| Elethiomel, post 958 wrote: |
| Quote: |
| I've said what I needed to say. I fully expect to be dead tonight, so I'm taking the day off and going back to my RL. Don't expect me to make a choice tonight. That would incur the possible risk of getting a town member to target themselves and making me look like the stupidest player in GL existence. Oooh. |
Why would you die tonight, if we lynch Sentran today? I thought the central assumption in your plan was that he's the last killer.
It's bizarre how you keep arguing that we urgently need to decide who else is scummy, as if lynching Sentran would be some kind of cop-out. If anything is a cop-out, it's letting the double Bob claim remain unresolved for yet another day. You now say "we don't know who's scum out of the two". But if you're telling the truth, there is pretty overwhelming evidence that the scum is him, not me. Why don't you "sack up" and act on that evidence? Lynch the most likely scum, so we don't risk him slipping away, in case you're wrong about your "only one killer left" assumption, or something else interferes with your ability. Then use the information gained from his lynch to make a more informed choice about who to target tonight. |
This is a really good point. For me, it really makes TGC look more scummy because his reasoning isn't adding up. I'll curse itisally for her recent addition to mafia and making me pause to think that some people just aren't as good at rhetoric and this shouldn't be an automatic mark against them. Still, I do believe TGC is capable of a high-level of rhetoric. TGC +1
| Elethiomel, post 975 wrote: |
f we don't lynch Sentran today, I think the odds are very high he'll be around tomorrow, too.
For example:
- TGC could be lying scum
- TGC could be role-blocked
- Another mafia member could perform the kill
And tomorrow, what will we do, with only 6 players left? Sentran can still vote (which he just demonstrated, and not by voting for himself, incidentally). In addition, there must be another mafia member (or we should obviously lynch him, anyway). Finally, someone was likely recruited by MNOWAX. That means town will be reduced to 3 out of 6 votes, and we will have lost control of the lynch. Even if we knew for certain that TGC was telling the truth, this is a risk we cannot afford to take.
I mean, this isn't rocket science. Lynch the scum. Doubly so, when the scum can kill you. |
I'm not sure why more people didn't listen to Eleth. I found myself agreeing with almost everything he said as I read through what I missed. *shrug*
Ultimately, the only way I can see that TGC's plan would have had any real force is if the town had voted No Lynch. I'm glad the town decided like it did.
-------------------
| The Great Crep'er, post 929 wrote: |
| And Amb I resent that analysis if only because if I were scum, I would probably view rm as a deadweight. There is not that much worth saving in a playstyle like his with his infrequent appearances and reluctance to give opinions (Sorry to bash you like that, rm. Just a bad outing for you this time around, I suppose?) and it hardly seems worth it for Mackay, as a scum, to go and intentionally make those connections with a recluse. It would be outside the interests of a scum to link themselves to a player who they know is in a "sinking stone" position. |
Excellent analysis. Sure it can lead to WIFOM, but sometimes you have to take the face-value.
| Mackay, post 974 wrote: |
| This entire day doesn't make any sense. My first impression is to halfway agree with Zag - my impression is that something has happened to make Sentran want to end the day quickly. |
The "something" is Sentran was losing his mind over the incredibly stupid bickering. I may be projecting what I was thinking as I read through all of that back-and-forth.
I had an epiphany somewhere in here: Eleth can give fake idols to somebody (Amb in this case), but when they are used nothing would happen since they are fake. It therefore didn't seem strange to me that Mackay received no notification of Amb giving her the fake idol.
That's it for my catch-up post. My next one (as soon as it's typed) will address some of the current events and include my thoughts on the scumminess of the players. _________________ Paragon Tally: 18 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 4:21 pm Post subject: 1096 |
|
|
So, I guess the best course of action is just to supply my reads on everybody and evaluate their claims as i go.
Elethiomel: Probably the most cleared person in my book. She does provide false idols which seems like a scum power, but most of her posts read genuinely town. The only way she is evil is recruitment (an unlikely target by MNO whom I believe could only have recruited once) or she and Sentran pulled a gambit (which I think is an unfruitful WIFOM argument because we just have to make decisions now about whom to trust). Status: Town
Amb: Amb is not scum anywhere in my book unless there were traitor masons, but I'm not going to invent some mechanic to frame him and just accept he isn't scum. Now, he would have been a reasonably decent pick for recruitment, but he did turn around right away and lynch MNO. The only way I will believe Amb was the cult recruit is if Aniima confirms she received a differently worded result for Amb, and only then if I believe Aniima's claim. Status: Likely Town
Captain Aniima: This one is tricky because she hasn't posted much. What I have read reads genuinely n00b town, but there isn't much available for analysis. The mark against her is definitely that she claimed cop when we have already had one. That is hard to evaluate (and no, I will not be sharing information that wouldn't have been available to a given other replacement of this slot). Ultimately, I would lynch Aniima before Mackay if it came down to whose claim is more believable. She is not a good cult recruit, in my opinion. Status: Possible Town
Mackay: The problem with good mafia players is they are good. The major mark against Mackay is the rm thing. On the other hand, she has claimed doc and had many more excellent posts which really do read like arguments for the town's best interest, even if some of them are largely based on unfounded paranoia. (I'll address that last below.) Status: Town
The Great Crep'er: He cannot be trusted. He lied. That's very much where I come down on it. It's a very convenient set of events surrounding him, and the logic was just so ass-backward. Plus, the point by Elethiomel which I highlighted in the above post gives me serious pause. I think he could easily be scum, and he was certainly one of the best options for cult recruitment. Status: Likely Scum or Cult
Unfinished, time out... _________________ Paragon Tally: 18 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 4:39 pm Post subject: 1097 |
|
|
Stupid library timer. There's nobody else around! Anyway...
Zag: He seems like a good candidate for another scum, but only if we think he was a traitor of some sort. This is hard for me because he read scummy early, and that really hasn't changed. Elethiomel makes a good point that there seemed to be an obvious dichotomy between he and Deception, and one of them should be scum. Deception flipped town, so...He would be a fine cult recruit regardless because he and MNO like to play crazy gambits. Maybe that's too obvious, but maybe it's a double-back of some sort. Status: Null, leaning Cult
Now, if we are willing to believe there is a changing alignments mechanic, I think the choice is between Amb and Zag. In that case, I very much would vote Zag over Amb. Still though, meta-gaming and out-guessing the mod is a dangerous road.
Which leads me to Mackay. I need you to accept that if there is a cult who is still recruiting, that is a fault of the mod for an unbalanced game (assuming post-game knowledge does not reveal the balance). If we lose because of such a thing, you should not be ashamed. Therefore, drop it please. There is at most one cultist out there.
My list would look like this, with scummiest/most likely to be cult at the top:
Zag/TGC
Amb
Aniima
Mackay
Elethiomel
Jedo
From my view, there is at most two anti-town parties left making it 2/7. We can always No Lynch today and let whatever killing party there may be make a move. That could bring us to 4/6 town tomorrow assuming the cultist doesn't die overnight. Not bad odds. At least take this suggestion with the knowledge that I don't often suggest No Lynch as an option.
Furthermore, as one of the most highly suspected members of the living, I think Zag needs to share his little power at which he has been hinting with us. I'm sure it will just lead to more WIFOM about him, and I feel it was bait to make us ask and therefore let him endear himself to the town, but we need to know. After that, I don't mind completing the puzzle by sharing the rest of my role. _________________ Paragon Tally: 18 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 4:42 pm Post subject: 1098 |
|
|
Finally, and I'm sure you'll forgive the multiple posts, I may not post again for a few days. Getting internet to my new residence has been a fiasco, but the latest date is August 21. Going to the library is not very convenient, so I probably won't drag myself down there again until Friday or Sunday.
Do not end the day, anybody! I think it is important for the players to respond to my posts and for me then to respond back. We are close to end-game, so let's take it nice and easy. _________________ Paragon Tally: 18 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot
|
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 5:01 pm Post subject: 1099 |
|
|
Mackay, if there's only one scum left, I still think it is you. I'm just not getting any traction on convincing people.
To the rest of you, I made essentially the same argument against Quailman in Jedo's game. If the rest of the townies had listened to me, we would have won. Even after I was killed, nobody went back and said, "Now that we know he was town, let's look again at his argument." And the town lost.
Jedo, I know you've had spotty access, so I'll review. If you think I'm barking up the wrong tree, I'll drop it. Here's what I saw. I was reading through the thread, looking for anything by or about ralphmerridew, who was our only known scum at the time. When I saw, on page 11 (or maybe early on 12) him do something mildly scummy, I immediately started looking for who is trying to make the sort of oblique defense of him that scum buddies tend to make. Then I found someone making exactly that sort of post, written by Mackay. Here is what I wrote. You can go back yourself to page 12 and look at the setup and what Mackay wrote. You'll recall that this is exactly how I spotted Q in your game.
| Zag wrote: |
I'm finally getting around to analyzing everyone's interaction with ralphmerridew/3iff, our only known scum. (Added: at the time I wrote this)
p 12.
Whoop, whoop! Here it is. Mackay, in post #459, makes a complex defense of rm, trying to defuse a scummy action he just took. I think that this is clear scum-buddy protection. She then hedges her own attack on MNO -- remember that the scum didn't know that MNO was a neutral cult leader; as far as they knew then he was town, so she has to look as if she is somewhat reluctantly voting for him.
p 16, post 619, Mackay makes another remark about rm that screams 'scum buddy' to me. The sort of qualified distancing that is really trying to defuse other people's negative opinion of him. ("Well, gee, I suspect him, too, but I think it's just his normal style and not really anything he's done.) |
_________________
| Death Mage wrote: |
| I couldn't agree with you more, Zag. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Amb
Amb the Hitched.
|
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 8:03 pm Post subject: 1100 |
|
|
| I actually like Jedo's posts there a lot. They make sense. Btw: I know I am not cult and therefore Aniimaa is either lying or the mod screwed up. That is mainly why I am not worried about being lynched tomorrow to verify Aniima. My problem with Mackay is that her great 'town' posts feel like staged arguments to me. If I could shake that, then I;d be more willing to forgive the rm connection. But I just cannot shake it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Captin Aniima
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2012 9:34 pm Post subject: 1101 |
|
|
I think you guys might be a little too certain about Amb's scummy-ness. While its true that the notice stated he was not mafia and didn't state anything else it doesn't neccisarily mean that he is cult. Maybe UM got bored and decided to change it up.
I was just thinking that if I can stay alive one more night I can investigate one more time possibly Amb again to see if I get the same results. If I get an "Amb is town" then I know he's town and if I get an "Amb is not mafia then the answer is simple hes cult.
That's if I can make it through tonight. At this point in the game it is a big possibility I will be night killed. Since its a big possibility I could see why you would want proof by lynching me because it will get you answers faster. Even though I'm not fond of it going that way I am open to being lynched.
Unvote since I'm not to sure on Zag in the first place I'm not to thrilled on the idea of an arguement. _________________ Just sayin... The sky is blue. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot
|
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 1:04 am Post subject: 1102 |
|
|
| Jedo the Jedi wrote: |
Mackay: The problem with good mafia players is they are good. The major mark against Mackay is the rm thing. On the other hand, she has claimed doc and had many more excellent posts which really do read like arguments for the town's best interest, even if some of them are largely based on unfounded paranoia. (I'll address that last below.) Status: Town |
Seriously? You overlook the other major mark against her, which is that our redirector had declared that he would be redirecting Mackay back to herself, and then there was no night kill.
Oh wait, you, umm, said
| Quote: |
| The Great Crep'er: He cannot be trusted. He lied. That's very much where I come down on it. It's a very convenient set of events surrounding him, and the logic was just so ass-backward. Plus, the point by Elethiomel which I highlighted in the above post gives me serious pause. I think he could easily be scum, and he was certainly one of the best options for cult recruitment. Status: Likely Scum or Cult |
So, do you have a different explanation for how 3iff died and no townie did that night? TGC's holds together perfectly. If you are saying that you don't believe he's a redirector, then you have to explain the past two nights, especially 3iff's death. You might argue that TGC is still redirector, but was MNO's convert. However, don't cult recruits usually lose their ability?
Your reading purely on the "fluff" without addressing the real evidence is, IMHO, misguided, but I know that it is purely in character. As much as I want to suspect you for siding with Mackay, I still don't, quite. While I don't really put much faith in Capt A being what she has claimed, it seems unlikely that you are both scum -- that would just be too many scum in the game.
That is, if Jedo is scum, then there aren't enough slots for Capt A also to be scum, which would mean that she is a cop as she claims. If she is, then she has cleared Jedo, so Jedo can't be scum. It leaves a logical inconsistency for Jedo to be scum at all. Unless I'm wrong about Mackay. I'm still operating under the assumption that I'm not. _________________
| Death Mage wrote: |
| I couldn't agree with you more, Zag. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mackay
Saviour of Spiders
|
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 1:22 am Post subject: 1103 |
|
|
Jedo, my paranoia is almost always excessive, but it is never "unfounded".
There is a claim of an anomalous cop result on one of the most likely cult recruits, who reacted with an attitude of "fine, I guess, as long as you don't lynch me till tomorrow". The other likely suspect flails around trying to invent worst-case-scenarios that don't even match what he claims to believe while ignoring the pile of evidence linking him to the cult leader, and seems intent on derailing arguments against Amb as well as the ones against himself.
My fear might be based on insufficient proof, to yours, or unnecessarily alarmist, but it is not unfounded.
I also refuse to accept that we should resign ourselves to losing in the case of an unbalanced-in-cult's-favour game. I'm still holding out the hope of the mafia being of assistance if possible, as it obviously works to their benefit as well. I made several suggestions of varying likelihood about why a continuing cult may not have reached the required number to win yet. I don't think the odds are insurmountable, and I love a challenge.
With regard to your suspicion of Creper: I agreed all through yesterday. He lied and attempted to differentiate his survivalist lies from the ones told by Deception or MNO, as though the town was supposed to magically divine his intent.The fact that he used the same rhetorical techniques for his admitted fake claim as for his current one was deeply troubling. But as of today I am withholding judgment.
That said, I'm intrigued to hear what information you have. (And chalk me up for wanting to know about Zag's super-secret power too.)
If you feel that there is only one of each anti-town alignment remaining, would you be amenable to a Zag lynch? I would prefer Amb, based on the resulting information that would give us about Aniima's trustworthiness, and the fact that we have a tangible result - but I believe Zag is a cultist also. In a cult-based worst case scenario, we are at lynch-or-lose. In a mafia-based one, we would be at lynch-or-lose tomorrow, and there is less evidence that this could be the case. I feel like the prudent decision is to lynch a suspected cultist even if you feel it is an excessive measure. If there is one mafioso left, I want them around to kill a potential cultist. (If TGC is honest, then they have already tried.)
Also, can I just say that it is SO NICE to have you back, and that I missed your "voice" in here? I just wanted to say that because a) it surprised me how happy I was to see that you had posted, and b) usually when I toss a personal statement your way it's a snarky one. I thought I'd mix it up a bit. Welcome back! (sort of. Hope the 'net issue stabilises quickly.) =)
Aniima, is there the possibility that you can request a clarification from the mod? I know that it is kind of difficult because Monk wouldn't want to give said clarification if the "not mafia" was intentional, but I think he would be willing to clear it up if he did mean for it to say "town"/be consistent with the other nonmafia results.
I guess there is reason to be wary of trusting UM's PMs too much, e.g. "Bob Crawley", but if I got a result like that I would be all over it. If you can get a clarification, or at least request one, that seems like a better idea than re-investigating Amb. I can only guarantee your survival for one more night, and if there are still two mafia then you can track down at least one of them. Someone with a tendency toward excessive paranoia might consider "reinvestigating Amb" to be a dodgy way of avoiding having to come up with new results. Just so you know. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mackay
Saviour of Spiders
|
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 2:25 am Post subject: 1104 |
|
|
Zag, here is another reason that a Mackay/Jedo scum team is unlikely:
If I were mafia with Jedo, then your argument against me makes no sense, as Jedo would have performed the kill.
In fact:
If I were mafia with Aniima, then your argument against me makes no sense, as Aniima would have performed the kill.
Oh hey, and:
If I were mafia with Elethiomel, then your argument against me makes no sense, as Elethiomel would have performed the kill.
etc.
If you are going to keep insisting that there are two mafia, you need to stop insisting that I am mafia. If you are going to keep insisting that I am mafia, you need to stop insisting that there are two mafia. (In this latter case, you should be helping the town find cultists, but you seem strangely uninterested in that.) Your "case" against me depends completely on the assumption that I am mafia on my own. You cannot then use that assumption to affiliate me with Aniima or Jedo or Elethiomel. I understand that you are desperate to discredit me, and that is why your logic lacks internal consistency. You need me to be mafia in every scenario you come up with in the hope that people will disregard my arguments. But ignoring both the arguments against you and the logical rebuttals to your assertions isn't going to work. I'm not the only one making them. You can't discredit everyone who expresses suspicion of you, though I can see that you are having a good go at it.
I can't help but notice that you are still making NO EFFORT WHATSOEVER to try to convince me of anything. In the case that there are two mafia, you need to convince me so we can begin eradicating them before it is too late. But you're not even trying. You're acting as though it is a desperate emergency, and you're not even trying to get the demonstrably unaffiliated town doctor on side. Your words and your actions stand in stark contradiction to one another. This is because your motives are not pro-town. Your motive (singular) is "no cultist lynches". Your intent is to distract, mislead, and obfuscate.
Personally, I don't know if there are two mafia, but given that I am not one it is a possibility. It really depends what their powers are/were. I guess a Jedo/Aniima teamup is possible (though in Aniima's place I'd make my fake result on him later in the game to make it seem less likely for him to be cult), but I find it less likely than I did earlier in the game - if there are multiple players involved I think TGC is more likely to be a factor. My opinion heavily depends on the information you and Jedo give us. It seems like Jedo believes his claim will yield a good amount of information, given the way he has been talking about it. I'm sure he is right, one way or the other. It will be easier to see which puzzle pieces don't fit once we have completed the set.
What's your ability, Zag? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Elethiomel
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 9:14 am Post subject: 1105 |
|
|
| Amb wrote: |
| I actually like Jedo's posts there a lot. They make sense. Btw: I know I am not cult and therefore Aniimaa is either lying or the mod screwed up. That is mainly why I am not worried about being lynched tomorrow to verify Aniima. My problem with Mackay is that her great 'town' posts feel like staged arguments to me. If I could shake that, then I;d be more willing to forgive the rm connection. But I just cannot shake it. |
You think Aniima is lying but you're not worried about letting her live for another two days? If the mod screwed up, don't you think he would simply correct his mistake? What if Aniima has or gets hold of a (real) immunity idol, for example? Why lynch Mackay before her?
BTW. I forgot to apologize to TGC for calling him a she earlier, and I should take this opportunity to repeat that I am also a he. Lots of gender confusion in this game.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Amb
Amb the Hitched.
|
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 7:46 pm Post subject: 1106 |
|
|
| Quote: |
| You think Aniima is lying but you're not worried about letting her live for another two days? |
Yes. Because if a person claims cop, and in effect fingers a person. If that person is scum cult, they will call the cop a liar. If that person is innocent, they will call the cop a liar. So you tell me what I can do about it...
Unfortunately there are a lot of theories about who the cultist is or would be. But I wouldn't have a clue. All of them seem to assume Mackay is scum. I believe Mackay is scum. I have done for a while. But it's pretty damned easy to be wrong in this game. I have watched as extremely scummy town members have died, and extremely innocent looking mafia won. I just don't think you can catch cult without a town role to do so. And the cop died already. I don't believe the second cop claim, and I'm sorry my reaction makes people think I did straight away believe them - but said claimant has me in effect strung up. They claimed Cop and put me down as "not mafia". Had Aniima said that about ANYONE else, I'd have strung them up. Probably before even Mackay.
All in all given that I'm part of the Aniima claim now, my belief or lack thereof is irrelevant and in the hands of all the other players. And when you lynch me and find that "Not mafia" literally also means "Not cult" then Aniima's game will be over straight after. So am I bothered by this change of events? Not really. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 9:02 pm Post subject: 1107 |
|
|
Zag, reveal your power. _________________ Paragon Tally: 18 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot
|
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 9:03 pm Post subject: 1108 |
|
|
I've been thinking about how powerful some of the town roles have been, with a couple mason sets plus cop, redirector, and someone able to make himself immune. And the scum haven't shown up with significant abilities, though we don't actually know what a Mafia Flirt is.
All in all, I realize that it isn't out of the question that UMonk considered it balanced to start with 5 scum, which would mean that Mackay, Capt A, and Jedo are all scum, AND we are not only at lynch or lose, but we've been there for a while! If you imagine that they also have a limitation of a very specific ranking, where the lowest ranking member always does the kill, that would explain the success of TGC's redirect threat on Mackay.
If this is the case, then TGC saved our bacon when he redirected Sentran to 3iff. They would have woken up on day 4 with a clear majority if a townie had died on night 3.
Let's just lynch the obvious-scum Mackay and be done with it. After all, I'm NEVER wrong (just ask Beartalon ). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot
|
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 9:07 pm Post subject: 1109 |
|
|
| Jedo the Jedi wrote: |
| Zag, reveal your power. |
It loses some effectiveness if I reveal it now. I promise to prove it tomorrow if I'm still alive. I realize that Mackay would like to insist that I have lost my power by being converted to the cult. I assure that I can prove that I still have my power, and I will do so tomorrow.
In any case, even if I were cult, or even if Amb is, we should be killing scum first. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 9:25 pm Post subject: 1110 |
|
|
Now that that is taken care of, I can address things.
Zag, 1099: You have a remarkable ability of getting into the mindset of scum. This is taken into consideration. My counter would be 1) you might be the scum/cult trying to mislead me and 2) it's hard to believe there is no doc.
Aniima, 1101: Under no circumstances should you re-investigate Amb. Ask for mod clarification.
Zag, 1102: TGC admitted he could not redirect the target's action onto themself, so that's not an issue. As to why we had a mafia death alone, it is perfectly possible that TGC was making a gambit with Sentran. He lied once after all, why not this? Is it totally crazy to kill one of your own then frame your buddy? Yes, but it is fairly unassailable because everybody would think it improbable. As for no death last night, we have a doctor admitting to protecting the claimed cop. Just because TGC says the case is otherwise doesn't mean he's telling the truth.
As I was typing the above response, it occurs to me that "mafia flirt" might just be the sort of alignment changer role many have considered to exist. I don't want to cause extra paranoia, especially not from Mackay, but it's worth considering.
Mackay, 1103: I call your paranoia "unfounded" because it doesn't seem to me to be founded on anything present in the game. The fact that nothing suggests further cult recruitment--your previous evidence having been shown up with Deception's town alignment--and that general mafia theory and history regarding game balance point to cult recruitment having ceased has not deterred you resurfacing this theory of yours time and again. I feel like you have a starting assumption that the cult continued to recruit, so any "evidence" you can find to support your made-up assumption gets you going.
I'm competitive with you, and I would love to beat a possibly broken game, but I don't know it's broken and I will not play as if it is.
Right now, I am very amenable to a Zag lynch. As in any game of Survivor (from what I understand) there is a certain level of constant distrust. I'm trying to fight that down. Excluding cult member possibilities, I trust Elethiomel, myself, Amb, and Mackay. And that welcome back is...uncharacteristic. I'm assuming it's genuine, but you can confirm post-game.
Did anybody want to discuss my possibility of a No Lynch? Again, I don't offer it lightly. _________________ Paragon Tally: 18 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 9:31 pm Post subject: 1111 |
|
|
| Zag wrote: |
| Jedo the Jedi wrote: |
| Zag, reveal your power. |
It loses some effectiveness if I reveal it now. I promise to prove it tomorrow if I'm still alive. I realize that Mackay would like to insist that I have lost my power by being converted to the cult. I assure that I can prove that I still have my power, and I will do so tomorrow.
In any case, even if I were cult, or even if Amb is, we should be killing scum first. |
Not going to work.
vote: Zag
Either your power is lynch immunity and we have a No Lynch today without discussion, or you are lynched and we discover you are scum. Time is over for playing games today, Zag. _________________ Paragon Tally: 18 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 11:02 pm Post subject: 1112 |
|
|
Thinking about it, I realize Zag makes a good point that we have noticed no considerable abilities of the mafia, so the third must be powerful or there are two more. Maybe we should compose a lost of powers to compare balance from what we know?
Anyway, even with another mafioso, I think two competing factions still keeps us about two days from Lylo.
And I still think Zag is not town. _________________ Paragon Tally: 18 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mackay
Saviour of Spiders
|
Posted: Thu Aug 16, 2012 11:40 pm Post subject: 1113 |
|
|
Actually, if his power is lynch immunity (i.e. an idol), the lynch passes to the person with the next highest number of votes a la actual immunity idols in Survivor.
That's me currently, but despite the slight concern that causes me, I think it is probably not worth worrying about - firstly because we simply don't have the numbers to muster both a primary and secondary bandwagon if we assume they are working as a voting bloc of 2 (which I do assume), and secondly because flavour-wise, Colby Donaldson has never possessed a hidden immunity idol in the actual game of Survivor. He has won individual immunity, but I believe that we have already seen how those work with Amb's immunity powers (JT was even more of a beast than Colby).
If you feel that "[my] previous evidence" (i.e. the acknowledged link between this particular mason group - Zag in particular - and MNOWAX) was nullified by Deception's death, then you should not be voting for Zag. Unless you think he got his alignment changed by ralphmerridew? That seems less simple than the idea that he was recruited by the person whom we know could recruit.
In any case, if you honestly believe what you just said to me - that Deception's death means that the evidence is null - then you should be voting for the suspected cultist with the non-null evidence.
Amb.
Not only does it give us a great deal of information about not only Amb's culthood and Aniima's cophood, but in the case of Amb being cult, it tells us something vitally important about the cult numbers/recruitment. Zag has already started hedging along the lines of "well, if Aniima was scum and just happened to guess correctly about Amb", etc. He is already working to discredit Aniima's (alleged) cop results in the case of an Amb death.
In addition Amb, as the single player who was the least likely to be lynched today, is far less likely to have had an immunity idol played on him, resulting in my lynch, than Zag. I'm not going to pretend that that idea isn't influencing me a little.
I will still get on the Zag vote if those on it (particularly Eleth) still wish to proceed. HOWEVER, I do not want the town to become complacent when/if he turns up cult. I want it known in the case of my death-by-idol or nightkilling that I see a link between Zag and Amb, and believe that they have been less worried about revealing it this game day because they only needed to finish today to win. (If it's correct that they recruit every other night, landing Zag on night 1 and Amb on night 3, then they're up again tonight, giving them the numbers to win the game if the Zag lynch fails. If they have a substantial failure chance without Hatch, there is still a chance at victory for us.) Should they both survive today at my expense, I urge the mafia to kill one of them tonight, as the only way for the game to proceed without a cult victory.
It shouldn't even need to be said, but I'll clarify this anyway: if Aniima receives a clarification regarding her results stating that the difference in descriptions from UM was unintentional, I will remove my vote from Amb immediately (in this case, however, I will not necessarily switch to Zag. My belief in the danger posed by the cultists is - obviously - based on the idea that there are multiple members. If Amb is not a member of the cult, then we should be lynching mafia instead. And despite what you say, Jedo, my paranoia is always based on events/statements in the thread, not on role speculations [barring their revealing something about the speculator, of course]. Though yours is an OK one. I'm going to elaborate on the basis for my 'paranoia' in my next post).
I knew the welcome was uncharacteristic when I wrote it (hell, I acknowledged it), but I wanted to say it anyway. It came as a genuine surprise to me that I enjoyed reading your posts, but I didn't want to phrase it in such a backhanded way the first time.
I have more to say about Amb/Zag but I'll break it off into a separate post, as I might not get it written before work.
Still want to hear your abilities before I speculate too heavily about mafia. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mackay
Saviour of Spiders
|
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2012 12:43 am Post subject: 1114 |
|
|
| Zag wrote: |
| Jedo the Jedi wrote: |
| Zag, reveal your power. |
It loses some effectiveness if I reveal it now. I promise to prove it tomorrow if I'm still alive. I realize that Mackay would like to insist that I have lost my power by being converted to the cult. I assure that I can prove that I still have my power, and I will do so tomorrow.
In any case, even if I were cult, or even if Amb is, we should be killing scum first. |
Don't put words in my mouth. I've already acknowledged the fact that if Amb is cult, then cultists get to keep their powers - another reason I suspect that there is a limitation on the recruitment in the form of a failure chance or alternate days.
You're still trying to delay the town, but it's by one day instead of two, so it's nice to see you've made your standards slightly more realistic.
| Jedo the Jedi wrote: |
Mackay, 1103: I call your paranoia "unfounded" because it doesn't seem to me to be founded on anything present in the game. The fact that nothing suggests further cult recruitment--your previous evidence having been shown up with Deception's town alignment--and that general mafia theory and history regarding game balance point to cult recruitment having ceased has not deterred you resurfacing this theory of yours time and again. I feel like you have a starting assumption that the cult continued to recruit, so any "evidence" you can find to support your made-up assumption gets you going.
I'm competitive with you, and I would love to beat a possibly broken game, but I don't know it's broken and I will not play as if it is.
Right now, I am very amenable to a Zag lynch. As in any game of Survivor (from what I understand) there is a certain level of constant distrust. I'm trying to fight that down. Excluding cult member possibilities, I trust Elethiomel, myself, Amb, and Mackay. And that welcome back is...uncharacteristic. I'm assuming it's genuine, but you can confirm post-game.
Did anybody want to discuss my possibility of a No Lynch? Again, I don't offer it lightly. |
Taking the possibility of a cult into account is not necessarily assuming a broken game. They may well be strictly limited. I have no idea.
But the main reason I wanted to quote this is that I feel as though you are framing this situation as me being unreasonable. I am being as pragmatic as I possibly can. Yesterday I had dismissed the idea of a recruiting cult altogether, once Deception turned up innocent. I acknowledged, and had for some time, that Zag had almost certainly been recruited by MNOWAX, but I felt that he was no longer a danger to the town. These are not the actions of a paranoid, unreasonable player.
Today, when a claimed cop stated that she got an anomalous result on Amb, then I started considering the possibility again. Remember the huge fight I had with Amb about Deception's lies, to the point where I started to get paranoid that somehow Amb was part of this Deception/Zag cultist group too? (Now that was some genuine paranoia,) It didn't make sense to me that someone pro-town could be dismissing Deception's open, admitted lies as "so-called". You, at least, acknowledged them and wrote it off as being Deception's playstyle. Amb tried to deny their existence. And if there is one thing I know about Amb, it's that he likes to move the goalposts as scum, and make statements that assume things that he wants the town to believe.
But I'm getting a little bit off track here. Amb was playing like a scum in his defense of Deception, which made no sense to me and I was forced to dismiss it after Deception came up innocent. When Aniima claimed her result on Amb it led me to reconsider the possibility, and I realised that in a situation where Amb is allied with Zag, he already knows Deception's alignment and whatever Zag has told him to make him behave the way he did. He can defend Deception heavily, knowing that he will be "in the right" at the end of it.
In addition, we have Zag's behaviour toward him today.
| Zag wrote: |
Wow! Does that make me want to believe that you really are a cop, since it would have solved our last puzzle.
But let's lynch Mackay, first; if the game isn't over and you survive the night, we'll have to lynch you. And then, if you are who you say you are, we lynch Amb and we win! |
| Zag wrote: |
| I am willing to lynch Capt A before Mackay, because I think both their claims are bogus and they are both scum. I am not willing to lynch the confirmed townie Amb first |
| Zag wrote: |
In any case, I suspect that the cute accusation of Amb is just a ploy set up by the scum duo to push the lynch away from them. With one more night, we're at lynch or lose. If Capt A has guessed right and Amb is the cultist, then she and Mackay will claim a pro-town victory in rooting out the cultist, when really it's a pro-scum victory in arriving at lynch or lose. If she guessed wrong, you know that Mackay will try to point you back to me.
Let me say it more clearly: Even if Amb were to admit in the thread that he's the cultist, lynching him now would be a mistake. We have to find the scum, first. Pick one you think is scum, and vote for that person. |
| Zag wrote: |
| In any case, even if I were cult, or even if Amb is, we should be killing scum first. |
I have to leave for work basically right now, so I'm leaving these quotes behind for myself to elaborate upon. But just look at them! Look at all the different tactics he is attempting to distract, redirect, or downplay. He is protecting Amb! (My favourites are the ones where he's like "even if Amb is cult, we shouldn't lynch him. In fact, we should lynch the cop who caught him first".
And there's no way that Amb, a Survivor fan, doesn't at least consider the fact that Phil Sheppard was an insane or random cop. His assertion that he simply doesn't believe that a second cop exists is disingenuous. It's PHIL SHEPPARD. (For the uninitiated, his entire character on the show was "that crazy guy who says he is an FBI agent". I only believed he was a real cop because of the similarities to my own character wrt the link between ingame role and RL profession. A second, sane cop makes PERFECT sense to me, which is why I'm conditionally trusting Aniima at the moment.)
Oh so much stuff. I have to leave. Bah. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot
|
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2012 1:27 am Post subject: 1115 |
|
|
| Jedo the Jedi wrote: |
| Did anybody want to discuss my possibility of a No Lynch? Again, I don't offer it lightly. |
Well, you win. You've advanced ahead of Mackay in the scum column.
Since I've already shown that it is impossible for you to be scum unless Capt. A is, as well. Then I'm declaring open season on the both of you. Just maybe I was wrong about Mackay. She, at least, has the sense to recognize that I can't possibly be scum, and scum are what we need to hunt right now.
I'll acknowledge that, if you don't know all that I know about Deception and his, umm, deception, it is reasonable to conclude that I would be the recruit. I think it's a little silly, since MNO and I were still feuding because of the last game, when he was lynched, but I can understand someone making the conclusion that he might try to recruit me. It didn't happen, but I can understand someone thinking so.
But whether you think it is me, Amb, or somebody else, if you are willing to no lynch rather than try to catch the remaining scum, it's because you are the remaining scum.
vote: Jedo and his buddy, Capt A. If the consensus is to lynch her, first, then I'm glad to go there. I acknowledge that we get a little more information from lynching her, so I think she might be the better choice. But the OMGUS reaction I'm feeling has me go for Jedo first. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot
|
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2012 1:31 am Post subject: 1116 |
|
|
| Mackay wrote: |
| And there's no way that Amb, a Survivor fan, doesn't at least consider the fact that Phil Sheppard was an insane or random cop. His assertion that he simply doesn't believe that a second cop exists is disingenuous. It's PHIL SHEPPARD. (For the uninitiated, his entire character on the show was "that crazy guy who says he is an FBI agent". I only believed he was a real cop because of the similarities to my own character wrt the link between ingame role and RL profession. A second, sane cop makes PERFECT sense to me, which is why I'm conditionally trusting Aniima at the moment.). |
Crud. I should have read the whole thread before responding.
I hadn't thought about an insane or random cop. Can somebody else who watches the confirm that this is the obvious role for her claim.
If she's one of the forms of incorrect cop, then she could be town even though Jedo is scum. Now I would much rather stick with Jedo for my vote. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Amb
Amb the Hitched.
|
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2012 1:43 am Post subject: 1117 |
|
|
| Mackay wrote: |
And there's no way that Amb, a Survivor fan, doesn't at least consider the fact that Phil Sheppard was an insane or random cop
|
How many ways do I have to say this? If I am fingered by said cop, I can call him random, I can call him a liar, I can call him cult, Serial Killer or whatever. It makes NO difference what I call him - because I am the one fingered by him. It makes a huge difference what you lot all call him - because it's the difference between me surviving and not. But whatever I say in the face of this will look like either desperation or abject depression. Both look like scum. So what do you want from me exactly? My fate is in your hands, not mine. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Captin Aniima
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2012 2:50 am Post subject: 1118 |
|
|
Just sent the clarification notice. Unless I'm sleeping I will post as soon as I get the results. _________________ Just sayin... The sky is blue. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mackay
Saviour of Spiders
|
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2012 5:43 am Post subject: 1119 |
|
|
Wow, Amb and Zag were both super eager to jump on the insane/random cop possibility, weren't they? It's kind of funny, though:
| Amb wrote: |
| Mackay wrote: |
And there's no way that Amb, a Survivor fan, doesn't at least consider the fact that Phil Sheppard was an insane or random cop
|
How many ways do I have to say this? If I am fingered by said cop, I can call him random, I can call him a liar, I can call him cult, Serial Killer or whatever. It makes NO difference what I call him - because I am the one fingered by him. It makes a huge difference what you lot all call him - because it's the difference between me surviving and not. But whatever I say in the face of this will look like either desperation or abject depression. Both look like scum. So what do you want from me exactly? My fate is in your hands, not mine. |
Er... but you weren't fingered by Phil Sheppard. You were fingered by the player who is claiming to be Sandra Diaz-Twine.
Coincidentally, mistaking Aniima's claim for "Phil Sheppard" is
| Zag wrote: |
| Mackay wrote: |
| And there's no way that Amb, a Survivor fan, doesn't at least consider the fact that Phil Sheppard was an insane or random cop. His assertion that he simply doesn't believe that a second cop exists is disingenuous. It's PHIL SHEPPARD. (For the uninitiated, his entire character on the show was "that crazy guy who says he is an FBI agent". I only believed he was a real cop because of the similarities to my own character wrt the link between ingame role and RL profession. A second, sane cop makes PERFECT sense to me, which is why I'm conditionally trusting Aniima at the moment.). |
Crud. I should have read the whole thread before responding.
I hadn't thought about an insane or random cop. Can somebody else who watches the confirm that this is the obvious role for her claim.
If she's one of the forms of incorrect cop, then she could be town even though Jedo is scum. Now I would much rather stick with Jedo for my vote. |
the exact same mistake Zag made!
Except in your case, it's disingenuous, because there was ALREADY a post where you explicitly discussed whether Diaz-Twine makes a coherent cop claim. Or, if you guys can discuss during the day, I guess it could be a genuine bout of forgetfulness after talking to Zag about it.
You were both just so eager for an excuse to call Aniima's results random. It's kind of cute.
Just a reminder that Zag is claiming that he has no stake in Amb's life or death whatsoever. He and Amb are just posting buddies, I guess.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mackay
Saviour of Spiders
|
Posted: Fri Aug 17, 2012 6:22 am Post subject: 1120 |
|
|
That said, I would like to hear more about this, Zag:
| Zag wrote: |
| vote: Jedo and his buddy, Capt A. If the consensus is to lynch her, first, then I'm glad to go there. I acknowledge that we get a little more information from lynching her, so I think she might be the better choice. But the OMGUS reaction I'm feeling has me go for Jedo first. |
My hope for today was always that you would help us catch the mafia. I get that Aniima needs to be scum if Jedo is, but I would like to hear more about why you think either are scum. Especially as you are claiming that you are not a cultist - Amb is, IMO, the second-most likely to be a lone cult recruit, the first being you, so I'm not sure what your problem is with Aniima's results otherwise. I'll assume for now that it is only due to the link with Jedo.
So with regard to Jedo: is it just the no-lynch? I haven't responded to his suggestion because I haven't yet tried to wrap my head around whether it would be a decent idea. Doing so now, I think it helps against the cult (keeps overall numbers higher to help stop them from gaining a voting majority) but removes our weapon against mafia. Which is fine temporarily if we assume that mafia are going to kill cult, but if you assume TGC's guilt as Jedo does, then it was Aniima who was the kill target last night and not you, meaning there's no real evidence that mafia are interested in killing cult. (I hope TGC is telling the truth and mafia are after cult. It would make life much easier.)
So... I'm leaning toward a "no"/"not fully thought out" but to call asking for one outright scummy isn't a thought process with which I am necessarily on board. This may be influenced by the fact that I am convinced that you and Amb are cultists together - and for all I know there is another - and therefore I want to take precautionary measures against cultists. I don't think it really helps us against scum though, and I'd rather lynch one of you than wait another day to do it (the cultists cannot take out scum at night, as far as we know, so a no-lynch makes us either marginally better off against cult with no change to the town/scum ratio, or far worse off against scum and cult - and I don't know about relying on the goodwill of the scum. It depends so heavily on who it is).
Anyway, I'm asking not to try to contradict you, but to gain more insight into other people's theories. I should probably go back and look at people's links with Sentran - but not till after Monday. I have an assignment I'm meant to be doing (but I keep playing mafia instead).
Jedo, I don't think Zag's ability claim is of enough concern for you to be withholding your own information. Please disclose your ability so we can try to figure out who the mafia are. I am uncomfortable with the fact that you have come back, seemingly taken control of the town's discussion, and are playing your own information so close to your chest when you have all of our info other than Zag's ability claim. The only circumstance in which it is important to learn Zag's ability today is if he possesses and has played an immunity idol. Anything else is likely either irrelevant (as he is very likely to be a cult recruit regardless of whether or not he still possesses his ability) or a lie.
I am currently choosing to view your lack of forthrightness as a characteristically high level of confidence in your ability to solve this on your own, rather than anything sinister, but the rest of us want to play too.
Do you know when you will have full-time internet access again? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|