The Grey Labyrinth is a collection of puzzles, riddles, mind games, paradoxes and other intellectually challenging diversions. Related topics: puzzle games, logic puzzles, lateral thinking puzzles, philosophy, mind benders, brain teasers, word problems, conundrums, 3d puzzles, spatial reasoning, intelligence tests, mathematical diversions, paradoxes, physics problems, reasoning, math, science.

   
The Grey Labyrinth Forum Index
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups    RegisterRegister  
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Heroes and Villains mafia - The town claim victory
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 14, 15, 16  Next
 
Reply to topic    The Grey Labyrinth Forum Index -> Mafia Games
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot



PostPosted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 11:13 am    Post subject: 121 Reply with quote

With a deadline looming, I certainly don't want to be lynched.

vote Jedo
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training



PostPosted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 12:42 pm    Post subject: 122 Reply with quote

If the town lynches me over Zag, then I don't think this town has a prayer. Look at the marks against him.

1) He goes along with what many believe is a shady reason to suspect me.
2) He says my reluctance to vote him is feigned because there was "nothing new" to have caused my mind to change (when there was).
3) In post 88, I show how Zag tries to delineate how he plays as scum and how he plays as town to cause us to believe he is town this time.
4) He paints my vote as OMGUS when it is clearly based on substance I see in his posts.
5) He unvotes me to appease Monk.
6) He votes me to save his ass rather than because I look strongly scummy.

With the low number of town, we are looking at probably 2/5 split tomorrow if we don't hit scum today, followed by 2/3 if we fail again--a lynch or lose situation. It's a little more important to vote for scum on Day 1 than it is in other games. I really think Zag has a strong likelihood of being scum. Vote him.
_________________
Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot



PostPosted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 1:34 pm    Post subject: 123 Reply with quote

Well, you've risen in scumminess with that post. I've seen you as town, and you are more fair-minded in that case. So, while I totally admit that my vote was to save my own butt (though it was still for the person I found most scummy), I now feel better about it.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training



PostPosted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 1:46 pm    Post subject: 124 Reply with quote

Zag wrote:
I've seen you as town, and you are more fair-minded in that case.

What does that even mean? I consolidated everything I have found scummy about you so people could easily read it in case they haven't looked at the initial instances. Then I showed how we only have three game days if we play poorly, something which I feel your nonchalance attitude contributes to. I don't know what you are claiming is scummy about that.

I'll go ahead and add "makes vague assertions about people's scumminess" to my list.
_________________
Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
Sentran
Ray of Sucking Funshine



PostPosted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 3:56 pm    Post subject: 125 Reply with quote

Zag wrote:
With a deadline looming, I certainly don't want to be lynched.

Jedo the Jedi wrote:
6) He votes me to save his ass rather than because I look strongly scummy.

This, more than any other reason given, moves Zag up (slightly) on my scum list.
_________________
Sentran
"Speaking of double negatives, I haven't read greylab yet today." - Lifeinmomland
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos



PostPosted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 4:02 pm    Post subject: 126 Reply with quote

Zag wrote:
Well, you've risen in scumminess with that post. I've seen you as town, and you are more fair-minded in that case. So, while I totally admit that my vote was to save my own butt (though it was still for the person I found most scummy), I now feel better about it.


Really...I mean REALLLLLLY. How is Zag still alive after that. I mean come on guys. let me break down this post for you all. There are 3 sentences in this post.

S1: "Well, you've risen in scumminess with that post." Ok fair enough you are going to back up this statement with facts right? right??? Oh just gonna ignore that for the rest of the point.

S2: "I've seen you as town, and you are more fair-minded in that case." OK? Then why are you voting him????

S3: "So, while I totally admit that my vote was to save my own butt (though it was still for the person I found most scummy), I now feel better about it." Are you freakin kidding me. a sentence ago you viewed him town now he is the most scummy oe out there. I mean at least when TGC seemed to contradict himeself he had a few paragraphs in between. You contradict yourself a single sentence later.

And then he doesnt address what about Jedo's last post made him so sure he was scum. And besides that are you telling me that you BY YOUR OWN ADMISSION VIEWED JEDO AS TOWN BUT VOTED HIM ANYWAY JUST SO YOU STAY ALIVE. Surprised Surprised Surprised

What sort of town move is that Zag. If you think hes town then try and get a vote on a player you feel to be scum or get a no-lynch wagon going. Instead you bandwagon (again sentence 2) a townie. I can not forgive that play especially from someone as expirienced as you.

Can I vote twice
Ultra Confirm Vote: Zag
Come on guys this is an easy one.
_________________
The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Sentran
Ray of Sucking Funshine



PostPosted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 4:52 pm    Post subject: 127 Reply with quote

Undercover Monk wrote:
S2: "I've seen you as town, and you are more fair-minded in that case." OK? Then why are you voting him????

At the risk of pseudo-defending another player, I believe what Zag meant is that Jedo is more fair-minded when he plays town, and Jedo does not sound fair-minded in this instance. Hence, the scummy feeling that Zag is receiving from Jedo, and Zag's subsequent vote for Jedo.
I do not feel that Zag's contradiction is as black-and-white as UM does. Unfortunately, the scum tells I see today don't seem to match with anyone else's. I'm not willing to blindly jump onto a bandwagon, for fear that I'll be led down the wrong path by the Mafia. Until I feel confident that a bandwagon has more chance of leading to a scum lynch than my own inclinations, I guess I'm a lone gunman.
_________________
Sentran
"Speaking of double negatives, I haven't read greylab yet today." - Lifeinmomland
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training



PostPosted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 5:47 pm    Post subject: 128 Reply with quote

As Sentran pointed out, Monk, I believe Zag is saying my post does not match what he has seen me do as town. The problem is he doesn't really explain how that is. It's just another assertion he throws out there without providing the evidence which points to this reality. I think that is a pretty decent reason to jump Zag up anyone's scum-o-meter.
_________________
Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot



PostPosted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 6:40 pm    Post subject: 129 Reply with quote

Sentran wrote:
I believe what Zag meant is that Jedo is more fair-minded when he plays town, and Jedo does not sound fair-minded in this instance. Hence, the scummy feeling that Zag is receiving from Jedo, and Zag's subsequent vote for Jedo.

The reasoning is exactly right, but the timing is off. I had already voted for him, based still on my fairly mild suspicion that I've had for a long time, plus my own desire not to be lynched. The whole fair-minded comment was based on his post after I voted for him at the top of this page. I makes me feel much better about my vote. Now I feel I would vote for him even in the absence of a defensive motive.

Sentran wrote:
I do not feel that Zag's contradiction is as black-and-white as UM does.

Thanks! Extreme Delectation Though I've never contradicted myself. I have only contradicted UM, who is simply wrong and doesn't like being told that.

Sentran wrote:
Unfortunately, the scum tells I see today don't seem to match with anyone else's. ... I guess I'm a lone gunman.

Welcome to the club -- at least you're not taking heat for your lone-gunman opinions.

I assume the opinion you're referring to is what you called "TCG's double standard." It's true that I didn't find that as scummy, but I see why you do and I don't exactly disagree with you. It's just that I see about as many ways TGC could be town and have made the same comments. I don't see it as a tell either way.

====
Post-preview edit

Jedo, you want specifics? I am comparing it to the way you acted when you were lynched on the first day of the last game -- your attitude this time seems completely different, much less stoical. Now, maybe it's because of it happening twice in a row (you being the day 1 lynch target), but since you did get to sub right back into that game, it didn't turn out that badly so you don't have any cause to be bitter.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Garou_Kinfolk
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 6:52 pm    Post subject: 130 Reply with quote

The Great Crep'er wrote:
Garou_Kinfolk wrote:
I didn't put an fos on you for it because it was an RVS vote.


I've since stated that RVS was no longer the case.

And your militant attitude towards lurkers when this game hasn't even seen two weeks is a bit concerning.


@T.G.C.: Thank you for drawing mt attention to how often I've posted about lurkers (4 times in 11/13 posts), but I don't know if I'd call it "militant". The worse I've done is fos Perpentach for it. If I was really being "militant" I would have put a vote on him by now and posted more directly about it more often. I also feel that requesting to see more posts from him is different then saying he's Scum for not posting as much as everyone else.
_________________
Most posts made from my phone.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training



PostPosted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 7:11 pm    Post subject: 131 Reply with quote

Zag wrote:
Jedo, you want specifics? I am comparing it to the way you acted when you were lynched on the first day of the last game -- your attitude this time seems completely different, much less stoical.

So, last game I was more stoic and took my lynch as it came. This time I'm less stoic and fighting my lynch.

*BUZZZ*

That's nonsense. There are quite a few differences between the two games in their layout, and I believe that is an inaccurate coloring of the two situations.

Last game, I was somewhat resigned to being the lynch because we had already gone through four claims and I wasn't going to add to it. For some reason, people don't like to back down until you claim which is what I find so ridiculous. Also, one mislynched townie on Day 1 wasn't a big deal for that game. At the same time though, I was still arguing for why other people were better options. It wasn't like I just sat there. I still provided defenses for my posts and argued in favor of others.

This game I'm still arguing in favor of a better lynch and trying to defend myself against accusations. What perhaps makes my posts seem even more fervent is that I believe a mislynched townie on Day 1 in this game will have much bigger consequences.

So, I'm still not clear on what is so different in this game and therefore more scummy. I hope the town doesn't continue letting you hide behind this nonsense.
_________________
Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos



PostPosted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 8:09 pm    Post subject: 132 Reply with quote

I apologize Zag once again the way I read the words of a poster has caused me to look foolish which does not help jedo who I am forced to defend when I could be scum hunting.

But even so Zag continues to post scummy post after scummy post take a look at this gem.

Quote:
Welcome to the club -- at least you're not taking heat for your lone-gunman opinions.


Lone gunmen!!!!! you no good dirty rotten truth spinning liar when have you been a lone gunmen. Even in the RVS stage you followed people you havent been the sole vote on someone all game. You have made 3 votes

jadesmar voted me then you voted me on page 1

garou posted his expirament vote on Jedo and you followed suite on page 1.

Eventually you unvoted Jedo to appease me on page 3 then put the third vote back on Jedo because you are afraid to die for the town.


I am not afraid to die for the town. If you want lynch me, Go Ahead!!! I have at least done something to deserve it. Ive been beligerant, arrogant, close-minded and if you could even accuse me of twisting the truth (even though in my case it was just mis-reading the post).



Jedo is the lead lynch for this

Jedo wrote:
Don't think I won't do it again, TGC. Also, I think it's best if we not drag our meta arguments across games...at least not until it is relevant.

I'm happy not to be mafia this game, so if you aren't mafia either, Monk, how do you feel about teaming up?


The very first post he made people.


Now I will sit back and watch Zag wiggle his way out of this lie and enjoy some popcorn.
_________________
The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Sentran
Ray of Sucking Funshine



PostPosted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 8:30 pm    Post subject: 133 Reply with quote

Shocked
I had not noticed Zag's propensity for being a follower this game, which is out of character for him. He does a good job of spinning reasons to vote people, but is never the first vote on someone. You know, almost like he's trying to let other people get the attention for leading lynches...
Alright, now I'm convinced.
Unvote, Vote: Zag
_________________
Sentran
"Speaking of double negatives, I haven't read greylab yet today." - Lifeinmomland
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot



PostPosted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 8:48 pm    Post subject: 134 Reply with quote

OK. Don't listen to lies in order to vote for me.

The first vote was RVS. It didn't mean anything.

In the second vote, you'll recall that I didn't even think anything of Garou's comment until you, Sentran, said that it wasn't something to bother with. It wasn't until then that I actually thought about it, and I realized that I thought it actually was something that I (STILL) think would be more likely for a scum Jedo than a town Jedo to say. Garou quickly backed off the comment, but I continued to think it was right, and I stood, alone, defending it. I still think so. I've never claimed 100% surety -- anyone who does on Day 1 is a fool. (Yeah, I'm looking at you.) But I thought it was a mild indicator, and the best we had so far. I was all alone on this opinion for a very long time.

All UMonk has ever had against me is that he does not agree that it is a mild indicator, and doesn't like that I voted for something he felt was nothing. Frankly, I think Sentran's case against TGC is nothing, but I don't think Sentran is scummy for thinking it is. It's just a difference of opinion. However, Sentran, your reluctantly being convinced to vote for me is typical scum behavior. Nothing has actually changed since your vote for Jedo, other than UM blowing a whole lot more smoke. Jedo even acknowledged that his reaction this game is different from the last one. He has a different reason for it, which may actually be the case, but you can't say that my picking up on a true difference is scummy.

I am John McClane, from Die Hard. My role is "Jack of all Trades" and I have three different abilities, one shot each. For each of those abilities, I choose one of two actions, and I can only use one of those abilities per day/night. One of the actions, which I had planned to use tonight, is a cop ability.

I now suspect Sentran and Jedo, mostly. Go ahead an lynch me. When I flip town, first, UMonk can eat shit. Second, lynch Sentran.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot



PostPosted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 8:50 pm    Post subject: 135 Reply with quote

Zag wrote:
UMonk can eat shit..

Sorry, I meant to qualify that.

.. for the worst and most aggressive misread I've seen in Mafia to date.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training



PostPosted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 8:53 pm    Post subject: 136 Reply with quote

Why did you claim? Before Sentran's change, I was at L-2; then you became L-2 three days from deadline. There was no pressure, and most of the people hadn't even weighed in yet.

Oh, Jiminy
_________________
Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot



PostPosted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 9:00 pm    Post subject: 137 Reply with quote

Zag wrote:
Garou quickly backed off the comment, but I continued to think it was right, and I stood, alone, defending it.

Just in case, UMonk, that you missed it: This was what I was referring to about being a Lone Gunman. I was alone for quite a long time on this position.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot



PostPosted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 9:03 pm    Post subject: 138 Reply with quote

Jedo the Jedi wrote:
Why did you claim?

Because I can read the writing on the wall. And I am willing to admit that part of me wanted to piss you off. Of course, if you are scum, then it hasn't worked, of course, but at least you have to pretend it did.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
The Great Crep'er
2% Spambot



PostPosted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 9:23 pm    Post subject: 139 Reply with quote

Garou_Kinfolk wrote:

@T.G.C.: Thank you for drawing mt attention to how often I've posted about lurkers (4 times in 11/13 posts), but I don't know if I'd call it "militant". The worse I've done is fos Perpentach for it. If I was really being "militant" I would have put a vote on him by now and posted more directly about it more often. I also feel that requesting to see more posts from him is different then saying he's Scum for not posting as much as everyone else.


I called it militant not because of the frequency but because of the chronology. You started in on the lurkers and tossing FoSes around three days after the game started. I just don't think there's much of a basis there to show that their lurking is interfering with the game that much. 1 post in 3 days at the start of the game is not a lurker make.

This should also be taken into consideration:

Garou_Kinfolk on post 44 wrote:

Perp for lurking this whole time.


Garou_Kinfolk wrote:
My definition of a lurked is anyone who has less poses then the mod. As of right now the only person who falls into that category is Perpentach with 2 posts all game. 3iff has 5. Raekuul also has 5 posts. Everyone else has 6 or more.


But: At the initial time of calling Perp a lurker.
    3iff: 4 posts

    Jedo the Jedi: 3 posts
    jadesmar: 3 posts
    Perpentach: 1 post (A small amount, but not the only one below the bar)


raised eyebrow: Garou_Kinfolk

As to the current brewing controversy, there are some posts I need to reread before making any type of a response.
_________________
Potato. Belgium. Eight. Random Lynch # Mafia awaits.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos



PostPosted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 10:04 pm    Post subject: 140 Reply with quote

Zag wrote:
Zag wrote:
Garou quickly backed off the comment, but I continued to think it was right, and I stood, alone, defending it.

Just in case, UMonk, that you missed it: This was what I was referring to about being a Lone Gunman. I was alone for quite a long time on this position.


Check again TGC has been voting jedo the whole day I think. def was on with you after Garou unvoted anymore lies I can debunk for you Zag.
_________________
The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
raekuul
Lives under a bridge & tells stories.



PostPosted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 10:24 pm    Post subject: 141 Reply with quote

My instinct is to vote for Zag.

But I won't vote for him yet. If I vote for him now, I'd be voting for him on nothing more than a hunch. What I need to do is to go against what I've been suggesting and analyze the thread.

In the meantime, unvote.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
raekuul
Lives under a bridge & tells stories.



PostPosted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 11:22 pm    Post subject: 142 Reply with quote

Reading through the thread, I've noticed that Zag is primarily aggressive, while Undercover Monk and Jedo are primarily reactive so far - and the person they've had the most interaction with is Zag. Of those three, I am reasonably confident that at least one of them is mafia. As I stated in my previous post, my instinct is to vote for Zag.

Vote: Zag

I'm going to keep a closer eye on UM and Jedo, regardless of how things turn out.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot



PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:15 am    Post subject: 143 Reply with quote

The question is why do you equate aggression -- especially on the first day -- with being scum? Look back on all the games you've seen, are the scum generally the aggressors? No. This is why I haven't accused UMonk, even though I think he's being foolishly aggressive.

In any case, I tried very hard not to be aggressive, and I managed to resist until I felt cornered.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
jadesmar
Bad Puppy



PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:48 am    Post subject: 144 Reply with quote

Garou_T being ultra anti-lurk is giving me a feeling of redirection and trying to lead the town away from.. who.. Zag? I'll need to check.

I do remember Mackay, in the Survivor game saying something like
"town, scum, we all need to get together on this" and you could tell that she was kind of targetting he own scum with that message and that's what I don't like about Jedo's post where he's audience shifts from Zag to ...?

Those are my readings right now.

The Undercover Monk, Zag thing I have no reading on. But, I'm willing to put the hammer down so that we can actually gain some information.

Vote: Zag

If Zag is scum, I think Garou might be too.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot



PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 4:12 am    Post subject: 145 Reply with quote

I think that's it.

Now that you'll learn I was telling the truth, remember what I said.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
3iff
very unbifflike



PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 7:09 am    Post subject: 146 Reply with quote

HOLD OFF POSTING HERE FOR A WHILE

I have a mod decision to make. Say nothing until I've made a decision.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
3iff
very unbifflike



PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 10:03 am    Post subject: 147 Reply with quote

I've made a decision. This is STRICTLY on timeline considerations only.

TGC PMed me an instruction Clearvotes: Zag when Zag was at 4 votes. The 5th vote for Zag was posted later.

I determine that the PMed instruction supercedes the later 5th vote and that the votes for Zag were all cleared prior to post 144 (where the 5th vote would have been cast).

I cannot say anything more now. This matter can be discussed at the end of the game. The deadline has been removed.



Day 1, 9 alive, 5 to lynch
Deadline: none set
Current Vote Count (to post 146)

Code:
(2) Jedo the Jedi: The Great Crep'er, Zag

Not Voting: Garou_Kinfolk, Perpentach, Sentran, jadesmar, Undercover Monk, Raekuul, Jedo the Jedi
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
raekuul
Lives under a bridge & tells stories.



PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 10:49 am    Post subject: 148 Reply with quote

Well, that's interesting.

Zag: I said one of the three of you are scum. You have the most dings against you, particularly because of how aggressive you are when there is little to no reason for you to be aggressive at this point in the game.

TGC: That's an interesting power you have there. I'm guessing it's a one-shot power?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training



PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 12:20 pm    Post subject: 149 Reply with quote

jadesmar, at least do me the courtesy of reading my responses to you. I told you I was addressing everybody else. That's generally who I have to convince in order for somebody to be lynched. If I had pressed enter after those first two sentences and made a new paragraph, you wouldn't even be talking about that.

TGC, either you tell us that you also have a cop result on Zag saying he is innocent, or my vote goes right back. You clearing those votes doesn't change anything, and it really doesn't even confirm your alignment.
_________________
Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
jadesmar
Bad Puppy



PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 12:25 pm    Post subject: 150 Reply with quote

Jedo the Jedi wrote:
jadesmar, at least do me the courtesy of reading my responses to you. I told you I was addressing everybody else. That's generally who I have to convince in order for somebody to be lynched. If I had pressed enter after those first two sentences and made a new paragraph, you wouldn't even be talking about that.

I unvoted you. Cannibal
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training



PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 12:46 pm    Post subject: 151 Reply with quote

jadesmar wrote:
Jedo the Jedi wrote:
jadesmar, at least do me the courtesy of reading my responses to you. I told you I was addressing everybody else. That's generally who I have to convince in order for somebody to be lynched. If I had pressed enter after those first two sentences and made a new paragraph, you wouldn't even be talking about that.

I unvoted you. Cannibal

But you brought it up again which tells me your unvote was just an appeasement and you don't actually believe my response.


I thought of something I think is important to share. A 9-player game is a lot different from the larger games, even just a 12-player. The scum have to be more bold in a sense because there are fewer targets for night abilities making it more likely for them to be redirected or investigated or something. I urge you to look at Amb's recent Robo-mafia and see how MNO played. You can argue that it's just MNO, but I've played in small games on MS and it's the same there. Keep in mind that "things scum wouldn't do" does not necessarily apply here.
_________________
Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos



PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 12:56 pm    Post subject: 152 Reply with quote

Wow can not believe a power got used on day 1. I sincerely hope that that was not a 1 shot unless TGC is mafia. Either way it was a rash decision. I won't be asking for a claim from TGC and will ignore any he gives much in the way Im ignoring Zag's McClane claim. In a game this small with a theme this broad claims are worthless and doubly so on day 1.

Lets see if we can re-vote Zag. Vote: Zag
_________________
The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Sentran
Ray of Sucking Funshine



PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:01 pm    Post subject: 153 Reply with quote

Well, that was an interesting and anticlimactic effort. Zag's attention immediately turned to me after I voted him, even though the reasons UM gave were sound.
Fact: Zag has followed votes all day, while giving different reasonings for each.
Fact: Zag voted for someone else just to avoid being lynched, not because he got a strong scum read from that person.
Fact: Zag claimed when the number of votes he had caught up to Jedo's (not surpassed them).

I'm not going to immediately revote Zag, although he's still at the top of my list. I want to see more discussion on this turn of events. Also now added to my FOS list are TGC and jadesmar.
_________________
Sentran
"Speaking of double negatives, I haven't read greylab yet today." - Lifeinmomland
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot



PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:04 pm    Post subject: 154 Reply with quote

Wow! A reprieve. Thanks, TGC. Jumping in when the sharks are circling might just get you bit, as well. I see that UMonk didn't learn. Or maybe he is scum after all, and my read is wrong. I can't believe that it didn't at least give him pause. I guess he's going to imagine that it was set up, and that my "bah" post was fiction. He thinks I'm more clever than I am (and that you're dumber than you are because it would be idiotic for two scum to out themselves this way), so I guess I should take it as a compliment (but not you, of course).

In any case, TGC, you're completely cleared in my eyes, and, I hope, the rest of the town after I get night-killed tonight. (Hmmm. I might only get role-blocked, which would really throw a wrench in it. If I do wake up tomorrow, and don't have an investigation result, you know what they'll say.) Perhaps you didn't know that the mod would reveal who it is that cleared the votes, but I think he did you a favor by doing it. Once people see my alignment, they'll know that there is no way you are scum. I guess that means that the scum has to kill you before me, since they can still claim that you were simply mistaken, whereas there's no way that, once I flip town, you'll be anything other than cleared.

If anyone has a doc ability, please protect TGC tonight. One of my abilities I can choose from is a one-shot doc ability, but using that would mean I can't investigate tonight. Plus, the scum is going to role-block me, anyway, and kill TGC. But maybe I'll try it anyway, in case they don't have a role-blocker. (Edit: I'm going to give it 40% to take that action, and maybe someone else will do it, so now you can't safely target him.) Plus I'm hoping that this whole bunch of speculation will make them think twice about killing TGC.

UMonk, seriously, stop the rabid attack and just think for a minute. You're reminding me of Ken Starr investigating Whitewater. If you really think you have evidence of me being scum, you've deluded yourself. I apologize for being insulting, earlier, I really have no excuse for that.

Jedo the Jedi wrote:
jadesmar wrote:
Jedo the Jedi wrote:
jadesmar, at least do me the courtesy of reading my responses to you. I told you I was addressing everybody else. That's generally who I have to convince in order for somebody to be lynched. If I had pressed enter after those first two sentences and made a new paragraph, you wouldn't even be talking about that.

I unvoted you. Cannibal

But you brought it up again which tells me your unvote was just an appeasement and you don't actually believe my response.

Or the vote was just distancing, and he unvoted when it looked like you might actually be in trouble, but then voted you again when it was safe, and you're both just acting. He did, after all, put in the hammer on me, which raises him considerably in my suspicion.

I'm currently thinking that it's jadesmar, Sentran, and Jedo, in order of suspicion. The first two are very close, and Jedo is not that far behind. If UMonk turns out to be scum, I'll be pretty surprised, especially because of his reaction since my reprieve. I find it hard (not impossible, but hard) to believe that a scum UMonk would keep up the attack. I guess that its possible that, observing my comments that I am inclined to clear him because of his aggression, he decided to double down -- or more like quadruple or dec-uple. But I still think it's genuine -- mis-guided, but genuine.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot



PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:16 pm    Post subject: 155 Reply with quote

Sentran wrote:
Fact: Zag claimed when the number of votes he had caught up to Jedo's (not surpassed them).

Oh. ~Double checks~ Crap. When I claimed, I thought I had one more than Jedo.

Sentran wrote:
Fact: Zag voted for someone else just to avoid being lynched, not because he got a strong scum read from that person.

I don't deny it, but I know that I'm not scum, so even a mild read is a better choice than me, from my perspective. Also, my read on him has increased since the vote, as I've explained. We've all been there, both as scum and as town, where a defensive vote might protect you, and you should know it has no alignment affiliation. You presenting it as if it does is a little suspicious, though.

Sentran wrote:
Fact: Zag has followed votes all day, while giving different reasonings for each.

You sticking to this is what has raised your suspicion level in my eyes. The only serious votes I've cast have been for Jedo. I realize that TGC was voting for me, but his original vote was just an RVS, anyway. I think that he did later declare that it was a serious vote, but that's when I was making the defensive vote.

So, the only vote you can say was a following vote is my original vote on Jedo, following Garou. There's one. Characterizing it as "all day" is very suspicious.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot



PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:23 pm    Post subject: 156 Reply with quote

Zag wrote:
I realize that TGC was voting for me, ..

This should have said "voting for HIM." It's completely confusing as written.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Sentran
Ray of Sucking Funshine



PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:32 pm    Post subject: 157 Reply with quote

Zag, I find it fascinating that my minor agreement with the person that is screaming for your blood makes me appear scummier than him, but whatever. Perhaps we are mincing words here, but however you paint it, you have not been the initial vote on anyone all day. That's an undeniable fact, and the tipping point in my opinion of you. If you noticed, prior to this revelation by UM I was even defending Zag's misconstrued words.
Zag, you claim that your only serious votes have been for Jedo. Let's analyze that. Jedo, although he was allowed to opt in for another player, has been killed on day 1 or night 1 in several games. Not because he's scum, but because he's a good town player. By your own admission you are a better scum player than town player. I'm starting to think that you're looking for any excuse to vote for Jedo to get rid of him. I believe you removed your first vote for Jedo to try to appease UM. That is far more suspicious than I gave credit to at the time. Why did you feel the need to try to make another player happy? Seems like a scum play to me.
_________________
Sentran
"Speaking of double negatives, I haven't read greylab yet today." - Lifeinmomland
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Sentran
Ray of Sucking Funshine



PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 3:37 pm    Post subject: 158 Reply with quote

Sorry for the double post, but I have a few thoughts/questions I wanted to get down before I forget.
1. Zag is trying to direct the town doc, which is usually a scum play.
2. TGC, were you aware that clearing the votes would be revealed in the game thread?
3. jadesmar, while I appreciate the quest for information, did you really have no better reason to hammer Zag?
_________________
Sentran
"Speaking of double negatives, I haven't read greylab yet today." - Lifeinmomland
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot



PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 4:26 pm    Post subject: 159 Reply with quote

Some reasonable questions. I'll suspend my suspicion on you for the moment and answer them seriously.

vote: jadesmar

There you go, the first vote on someone. Revenge most foul!

I'll agree that the second vote on someone, especially the first day, is usually more suspicious than the first. All I can say is that I've voted my belief all along, and that happened to be that I was convinced Garou had something, even when he didn't think so. Would I have made the same vote if I were scum and knew Jedo to be town? Very possibly. I never claimed that it wasn't something that could appear suspicious, which is part of the reason that I haven't been quiet as suspicious of UM as most people would be. Unfortunately, as townies, you have to vote, and that might appear suspicious.

I don't think Jedo is as good a town player as he thinks he is, or even as good as I am. In the last two games in which I wasn't mafia, I made dead right reads on Quailman and Mackay. Jedo, meanwhile, in the Dead Thread wrote that there is an "infinitismally small chance she [Mackay] is scum," when I was even more convinced than ever. In fact, at the point he wrote that, I was confused that there was anyone who couldn't see it.

I will say that my skill as a town player doesn't kick in until we know for sure at least one scum. Then I go back and review all the comments people make about him and all the comments he's made. Until then, I don't find any interaction evidence terribly compelling, as I've said all along. It's part of why I think that UMonk is being foolish for being "so sure" about me. There just fundamentally isn't enough information, on day 1, to be that sure about anybody. Of course, I have the added advantage in knowing for sure that he's wrong, whereas the rest of you have to wonder.

Jedo, on the other hand, is a very good scum player, much better than I am at manipulating the voting. In the Game of Thrones game (the one in which I backed MNO's story early, but we were both scum), Jedo had basically manipulated the voting into a win for us, we were voting off one townie and another townie was totally set up to take the heat for it. It was a masterwork. Then MNO switched his vote and screwed it up, because he didn't understand the tiebreaker rules. If not for that mistake, we would have coasted to a victory.

My only skill as a scum is basically to appear innocent. I use a slightly self-deprecating style and generally bring up mild evidence against myself so no one else can do it. I don't manipulate very well, and tend to get caught when I do. That's why I only stick to genuine evidence against people, and I try to avoid stuff that might be controversial. That's why I think it's so bizarre that I've been accused for the reason I have been. It's something I NEVER would have even discussed if I were scum.

My comment about being a better scum player than a town player is old, and pre-dates my perfect read on Mackay. I now am much more confident in my townie skills. In any case, if you are willing to accept that I'm a good scum player, if I'm scum this game then I certainly didn't show it. In reality, I am much less concerned with being found suspicious when I'm town than when I'm scum. I'll probably change that, somewhat, in the future, just because I was pretty unhappy when I thought I was being lynched on the first day.

As I said when I unvoted Jedo the first time, I was only superficially doing it to appease UM. (I even said when I was doing it that it wouldn't work.) I was doing it primarily to stop the conversation around it, because I thought that all productive conversation was long since over. I was hoping we'd move on to a new topic, and I hoped that "appeasing UM" would let it die down and we could discuss something else. Of course, I did want to save my own butt, but at least as much I really did want to have a different discussion that could be used for fodder in the future.

==============

Post preview edit:

I'm only a little bit trying to direct the town doc. At least as much I'm trying to make the scum have to think twice before killing TGC. As I said, I might choose to protect him myself. In any case, even if I were trying to instruct the doc, it is justified because (in my eyes) TGC is 100% cleared. There is zero chance that a scum TGC would have done what he did. I do understand that, until you know that I'm town, you don't have this perspective. But assume for a minute that you know I am -- you would also know that TGC is 100% cleared.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
The Great Crep'er
2% Spambot



PostPosted: Tue Sep 18, 2012 4:30 pm    Post subject: 160 Reply with quote

To answer a few quick questions:
-No, I had no idea that my action would feature my name in the thread.
-To save you the trouble: No, as per my role power, you cannot revote Zag today.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous: by   
Reply to topic    The Grey Labyrinth Forum Index -> Mafia Games All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 14, 15, 16  Next
Page 4 of 16

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Site Design by Wx3