| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Elethiomel
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Oct 01, 2012 3:54 pm Post subject: 161 |
|
|
| Lost of good clues... can't decide. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Suspence
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 9:46 pm Post subject: 162 |
|
|
Bump...lots of clues, not a lot of votes. Please vote so we can move this one along. _________________ I hate people who try to write interesting things in their signature. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Tired of his old title
|
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 9:55 pm Post subject: 163 |
|
|
I finally got around to checking these out.
I am generally of the opinion that any credible &lit should win over any clue that isn't one. DejMar's &lit version is really quite good, with nothing wasted in the wordplay and a pretty reasonable definition. "Vacillating" is a somewhat odd adjective for a tornado, but not horrible.
The only improvement I can think of, but which I can't get to work (in 30 seconds of trying), is to try to work some form of "destroy/destructive" in there as the an adjective in the definition and as the word for "torn" in the wordplay. But, as I said, I haven't managed to find a form that makes it work both ways.
I am a little surprised to see that my vote broke a tie with that one against my own clue. Maybe I shouldn't have voted.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Suspence
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 11:09 pm Post subject: 164 |
|
|
| In the rules, I wrote: |
| 4) People vote on the best clue. You may not vote for your own clue. If you posted a clue, it would be appreciated if you also cast a vote. |
It's appreciated  _________________ I hate people who try to write interesting things in their signature. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Suspence
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 4:44 pm Post subject: 165 |
|
|
We can call this one. Dej Mar, please select a new word. _________________ I hate people who try to write interesting things in their signature. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DejMar
(Possibly a robot)
|
Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 5:20 pm Post subject: 166 |
|
|
Okay, new word:
SAND
Now I will have to think of some clues.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Suspence
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 5:28 pm Post subject: 167 |
|
|
SAND:
The Last of the Mohicans along with True Grit _________________ I hate people who try to write interesting things in their signature. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DejMar
(Possibly a robot)
|
Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:38 pm Post subject: 168 |
|
|
SAND:
A bit of spit and polish. (4)
Reverse engineer genetic encodings for a grain, perhaps. (4)
Entrances to speedway area near Daytona Beach. (4) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Amb
Amb the Hitched.
|
Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 9:48 pm Post subject: 169 |
|
|
| SAND The man who puts you to sleep is Polish? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
novice
No harm. Pun intended!
|
Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 10:46 pm Post subject: 170 |
|
|
| SAND: Found in boxes and bags! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Thok
Oh, foe, the cursed teeth!
|
Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 11:39 pm Post subject: 171 |
|
|
SAND: Smooth tan
If I wanted to be incredibly abusive, I could go for Buff! but I can't quite decide if it's legal. Both words mean to polish and a shade of brown, but I think both sand and buff get that definition roughly the same way, by being brown stuff that is used to polish. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DejMar
(Possibly a robot)
|
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 4:30 am Post subject: 172 |
|
|
For a more cryptic cryptic for SAND:
A measure of time passing before a grand, older you departs. (4)
SAND // [thou]SAND
clue definition: a measure of time passing before [i.e., in former times] = SAND
wordplay definition: a grand = THOUSAND
wordplay definition: older you = THOU
wordplay word-letters deletion indicator: departs {target: THOU from: THOUSAND}
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Scurra
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 1:14 pm Post subject: 173 |
|
|
I didn't know we were allowed to enter multiple times.
SAND: Find this in the Sahara, Arabian, Neghev deserts (4)
p.s. I honestly thought that winning clue for Tornado didn't work, although I grant you it's a very good try (better than mine, because I had to include too many surplus words.) _________________
still Quiz Olympiad champion. Must get a life.
New definitions: COFFEE - someone who is coughed upon
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Suspence
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 2:20 pm Post subject: 174 |
|
|
| Scurra wrote: |
I didn't know we were allowed to enter multiple times.
|
We aren't, but Dej Mar never listens . I probably never stated it explicitly, but we should limit it to that. _________________ I hate people who try to write interesting things in their signature. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DejMar
(Possibly a robot)
|
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 4:04 pm Post subject: 175 |
|
|
If it is finding the "best" cryptic clue for the word, then multiple entries should be permitted. What's the harm? The poll is not a sum of the coiners entries. In fact, limiting the submissions of a cryptic cluer does harm by not allowing one to be as creative as s/he can be. Thus it not only should be allowed, but encouraged.
Scurra:
| Scurra wrote: |
| p.s. I honestly thought that winning clue for Tornado didn't work, although I grant you it's a very good try (better than mine, because I had to include too many surplus words.) |
TORN+ADO = TORNADO !
vacillating - adjective: torn; undecided about something
verb: moving or swaying in a rising and falling or wavelike pattern [A very apt description of tornados. Take it from one who used to live in an area that was occasionaly plagued by them. Or go see the movie Twister.]
stir of activity - noun: ado [Another apt description of tornados.] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
groza528
No Place Like Home
|
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 5:05 pm Post subject: 176 |
|
|
| DejMar wrote: |
| If it is finding the "best" cryptic clue for the word, then multiple entries should be permitted. What's the harm? The poll is not a sum of the coiners entries. In fact, limiting the submissions of a cryptic cluer does harm by not allowing one to be as creative as s/he can be. Thus it not only should be allowed, but encouraged. |
The harm is to other potential submitters and is twofold:
1) The number of *entries* is limited, perhaps not strictly, but we cut off at a certain ballpark or the polls get overwhleming. When one person floods the entries it may prevent someone else from participating.
2) Like it or not, there are only so many ways the wordplay can work for a particular word. "Sand" is unlikely to get anagram or homophone clues, for example. Too a lesser degree, definitions suffer from a similar problem. It's discouraging enough for someone to try to come up with a clue when they see that someone else has already claimed the best ideas, worse when they're all by the same person who just happened to be online before them (I don't know about the lot of you, but I don't let the spoiler tags stop me from reading everyone's clues.)
It is ridiculous to say that limiting one person's submissions stifles creativity. There's no reason you can't come up with a dozen clues on a sheet of graph paper and pick the best one, but if you come up with a dozen clues on a sheet of graph paper and pick the best six it stifles the creativity of other players. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
groza528
No Place Like Home
|
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 5:08 pm Post subject: 177 |
|
|
| Personally, I also think that the person choosing the word should not be able to submit the first clue either, if we let them submit at all, for reasons similar to #2-- people choose words to clue based on the potential for clues they see, which gives them first crack at the best ideas. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DejMar
(Possibly a robot)
|
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 5:40 pm Post subject: 178 |
|
|
| groza528 wrote: |
| It is ridiculous to say that limiting one person's submissions stifles creativity. There's no reason you can't come up with a dozen clues on a sheet of graph paper and pick the best one, but if you come up with a dozen clues on a sheet of graph paper and pick the best six it stifles the creativity of other players. |
1. This thread was not presented as a contest.
2. If a person could judge one clue as best from six, then why the need of a poll?
| groza528 wrote: |
| Personally, I also think that the person choosing the word should not be able to submit the first clue either, if we let them submit at all, for reasons similar to #2-- people choose words to clue based on the potential for clues they see, which gives them first crack at the best ideas. |
3. Others may be, as you say, "unfair" in choosing words they may have pre-planned clues for. I am not one. I randomly chose SAND without much thought. It was only after I started thinking about the word did I begin creating any cryptics. In fact, Suspense had already taken my initial idea. It was after that that I set about alternative cryptics.
4. I agree that one might preclude the idea of another. Since this is about creating the "best" cryptic for the clue, with a community voting on the best, then it should be okay for one to submit a similar clue if they have an idea for an improvement and-or more clever take. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
groza528
No Place Like Home
|
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 6:06 pm Post subject: 179 |
|
|
| DejMar wrote: |
1. This thread was not presented as a contest. |
You're right, it was presented as a "competition." The distinction is a bit too subtle to me.
| Quote: |
2. If a person could judge one clue as best from six, then why the need of a poll? |
True but irrelevant; even if your judgment does not match the crowd, your concern was about creativity.
| Quote: |
| 3. Others may be, as you say, "unfair" in choosing words they may have pre-planned clues for. I am not one. I randomly chose SAND without much thought. It was only after I started thinking about the word did I begin creating any cryptics. In fact, Suspense had already taken my initial idea. It was after that that I set about alternative cryptics. |
And I did notice that, but a lot of the others have submitted "The new word is XXX and here is my clue" which led me to infer that they had given it prethought. That particular line was not targeted at you... Actually I hate to say that any of it is targeted directly at you, but at the moment you're the representative of the dissenting opinion, I guess. But I hope I didn't come across as too personal.
| Quote: |
| 4. I agree that one might preclude the idea of another. Since this is about creating the "best" cryptic for the clue, with a community voting on the best, then it should be okay for one to submit a similar clue if they have an idea for an improvement and-or more clever take. |
Part of what makes a cryptic clue elegant is originality of thought. I, for one, am much less likely to vote for a clue if there are three other similar clues and I suspect that I'm not alone. Even if the idea is really interesting, by the third time I read it they all blend together into a humdrum mess and the great idea doesn't get the attention it deserves.
So from the point of view of my previous argument, when I try to design a clue that I hope will get votes, I want it to stand out from the others and will usually discard another take on an idea that's been used by someone else, even if I think it's an improvement. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
novice
No harm. Pun intended!
|
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 7:40 pm Post subject: 180 |
|
|
| I create my entry without reading the spoiler tags. That adds some pressure for being original. But even so I agree it's an advantage to get your submission in as soon as possible. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Elethiomel
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 7:46 pm Post subject: 181 |
|
|
SAND:
Bushmen drive on gravel. (4) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Elethiomel
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 7:51 pm Post subject: 182 |
|
|
| Also, having now looked at the spoilers, I do think DejMar should select one clue to submit for the poll. Four clues from one setter is a bit much. I don't think it will help his chances of winning, but it will overcrowd the poll IMHO. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DejMar
(Possibly a robot)
|
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 9:35 pm Post subject: 183 |
|
|
As the majority(?) seems to want only one submission per person, I present the selection of one of the two favorites of my own submissions:
SAND:
Entrances to speedway area near Daytona Beach. (4)
Edit Amb: Cryptics should be in invisible. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Suspence
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 9:38 pm Post subject: 184 |
|
|
I'd say one submission per person should be the rule. If you want to edit or completely change your submission before the poll, that is fine, but each poll should only have only clue per participant. _________________ I hate people who try to write interesting things in their signature. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Amb
Amb the Hitched.
|
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 10:39 pm Post subject: 185 |
|
|
| Has Dejmar actually been entering? I thought he was mostly posting after each poll went up - until now. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Suspence
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 10:43 pm Post subject: 186 |
|
|
He posted a few (and I included all of them in the poll) for COLLAPSE, if I recall correctly. I figured if anyone objected I'd make a ruling. No one did at that time, but now that someone has I figured it was time to make a decision. _________________ I hate people who try to write interesting things in their signature. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Tired of his old title
|
Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 11:53 pm Post subject: 187 |
|
|
| I had been assuming that you only took the last submission of any one person. But I don't really care that much: It's not as if we are keeping score or anything. If someone has multiple good ideas, why not? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Suspence
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 12:00 am Post subject: 188 |
|
|
| Zag wrote: |
| It's not as if we are keeping score or anything. |
I can solve that:
Previous Winners:
COPPICE - Copulation ends prematurely - epic failure in the bushes. (Elethiomel)
OSPREY - Yes, pro wrestling is a feather in the cap. (Elethiomel)
FECUNDITY - Fertility god loses left eye after engaging cheer leaders in merry-making. (Zag)
CELIBATE - Cold reflux of alkaline fluid eroded continent. (novice)
COLLAPSE - Rise out of solar eclipse, carelessly fall down. (Amb)
TRIVIAL PURSUIT - Six getting into trouble following a board game. (Suspence)
TORNADO - Vacillating stir of activity! (Dej Mar)
Standings:
2 Wins - Elethiomel
1 Win - Zag, novice, Amb, Suspence, Dej Mar
And, while I'm posting...TORNADO results for posterity:
What is the best cryptic clue for TORNADO?
Tandoor destroyed in typhoon.
0% [ 0 ]
Whirlwind ripped a door in half.
22% [ 2 ]
Vacillating stir of activity!
44% [ 4 ]
Wicked odorant has made one violently active.
0% [ 0 ]
Dots on a floor leaving fools playing Twister.
0% [ 0 ]
Karate expert taken back by bull; spanish wind blows strongly.
0% [ 0 ]
Ruptured a beehive, possibly in a whirlwind.
22% [ 2 ]
Road not taken due to storm.
11% [ 1 ]
Funnel encoded material into important list.
0% [ 0 ] _________________ I hate people who try to write interesting things in their signature. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Tired of his old title
|
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 12:19 am Post subject: 189 |
|
|
| Heh heh. I still like my "Fertility god" one. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Scurra
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 12:52 am Post subject: 190 |
|
|
If we're only allowed one, then I'd like to submit this one instead:
SAND: Polish George (4)
At the risk of flogging a dead horse,
| Quote: |
| verb: moving or swaying in a rising and falling or wavelike pattern [A very apt description of tornados. Take it from one who used to live in an area that was occasionaly plagued by them. Or go see the movie Twister.] |
I don't see how spinning round and round in a funnel shape can be compared to rising and falling like a wave. Although I have to admit that I'm a lot happier with that than I am with spelling "purr" with one r.
explanation of above clue for SAND: George Sand was a French writer who is perhaps best known for her affair with Polish composer Frederick Chopin. _________________
still Quiz Olympiad champion. Must get a life.
New definitions: COFFEE - someone who is coughed upon
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DejMar
(Possibly a robot)
|
Posted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 4:37 am Post subject: 191 |
|
|
The dead horse is ready for the glue factory.
Tornados often rise and fall to the ground, hence they are known to jump locations and spare homes and property that would otherwise be in their path of devastating stir of activity. In addition, vacillating is not limited to just rising and falling to the 'fixed "plane"' of the earth's surface. It can also be used to refer to moving and swaying left and right. (Just rotate the imaginary axis. It's permitted.). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Amb
Amb the Hitched.
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 3:38 am Post subject: 192 |
|
|
Cast vote to block! (4)
Veto |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Suspence
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2012 1:39 pm Post subject: 193 |
|
|
SAND poll is up. Hopefully I got everyone's "final" submission...this round was a bit difficult due to all the discussion. _________________ I hate people who try to write interesting things in their signature. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Suspence
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 3:55 pm Post subject: 194 |
|
|
Bump...in hopes of a deciding vote. _________________ I hate people who try to write interesting things in their signature. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Amb
Amb the Hitched.
|
Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 11:27 pm Post subject: 195 |
|
|
| I was the third vote on Smooth Tan. Mohicans was already on 3. If you don't get a deciding vote, then I'd say go with Mohicans since it reached 3 first. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Amb
Amb the Hitched.
|
Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 10:02 am Post subject: 196 |
|
|
Important instructions for Power of Attorney holder? [11]
Significant / Sign if I can't |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Suspence
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 11:28 pm Post subject: 197 |
|
|
Well, we got another vote, but it only complicated things. Hopefully we'll get a decider over the weekend. If not, I may go with the "first to 3 votes" as suggested. _________________ I hate people who try to write interesting things in their signature. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Scurra
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 11:42 pm Post subject: 198 |
|
|
I'm interested to know why people like the ones that have received the most votes.
I like the idea behind the Mohicans one, but "True" seems a bit like a superfluous word (unless it's supposed to be a clue to "and", in which case I don't understand it.)
And I don't see how the ! is justified in the Found in... clue, since "sand" is perhaps the last thing I'd expect to find in a box (it would leak out, surely? )
(I ended up voting for the double definition, possibly because mine was a double def. as well, although I think mine was too obscure.)
As for the others:
Bushmen drive on gravel - don't understand this clue at all. I'm obviously stupid.
Entrances to speedway area near Daytona Beach - I'm not convinced that "beach" is a good synonym for "sand"; a beach can be made from sand, certainly (I don't know enough about Daytona Beach specifically, although I know that's only there for the acronym) but sand is not a beach.
The man who puts you to sleep is Polish? - now this one doesn't work because you can't use "Polish" and "polish" interchangeably unless you use it in a context where the upper-case can be used plausibly (as I did.) _________________
still Quiz Olympiad champion. Must get a life.
New definitions: COFFEE - someone who is coughed upon
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Suspence
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 11:46 pm Post subject: 199 |
|
|
| Scurra wrote: |
"sand" is perhaps the last thing I'd expect to find in a box (it would leak out, surely? ) |
This made me laugh. Not a box full of sand, but a sandbox...I voted for this since I thought it was clever.
I find "True" superfluous in mine, as well. _________________ I hate people who try to write interesting things in their signature. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Scurra
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 11:50 pm Post subject: 200 |
|
|
Now that's interesting. I never made the "sandbox" association at all, but now that it's been pointed out, it seems pretty obvious. _________________
still Quiz Olympiad champion. Must get a life.
New definitions: COFFEE - someone who is coughed upon
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|