|
|
|
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 12:13 am Post subject: 201 |
|
|
Great. I'm glad you don't bluff.
Now let's see if it's true. _________________ Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Amb
Amb the Hitched.
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 12:19 am Post subject: 202 |
|
|
| My understanding is that a bandwagon is usually at best to get a claim, and worst case a lynch. There is a double standard there. I think the Freudian slip is far worse. And I think the attitude that a person who attacks him is therefore tied to MNO and both are therefore scum - is the attitude of someone who isn't interested in genuinely finding scum. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 12:37 am Post subject: 203 |
|
|
| Amb wrote: |
| And I think the attitude that a person who attacks him is therefore tied to MNO and both are therefore scum |
Let this stand as evidence that Amb hasn't understood the things of mine which he has quoted. _________________ Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Amb
Amb the Hitched.
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 1:17 am Post subject: 204 |
|
|
Which if i haven't understood, then all you have proven is that I am dumb. Be that the case, then thanks a tonne... buddy
I'm more sold on the Freudian slip than anything else. There are far worse lynches on day 1 than that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 1:31 am Post subject: 205 |
|
|
And far better. What exactly is unconvincing about MNO's scumminess? _________________ Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sentran
Ray of Sucking Funshine
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 3:22 am Post subject: 206 |
|
|
| Jedo the Jedi wrote: |
| And far better. What exactly is unconvincing about MNO's scumminess? |
Who the hell cares about MNO's scumminess when faced with yours? Quit deflecting already, you've been caught! _________________ Sentran
"Speaking of double negatives, I haven't read greylab yet today." - Lifeinmomland |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 3:41 am Post subject: 207 |
|
|
So far, all I've heard is a supposed Freudian slip which wouldn't be suspicious on any Day but this one. MNO's situation would be scummy on any Day.
And answering the accusations is not deflecting. That's better than MNO who had to be significantly pressed before he gave any kind of response to the questions leveled against him. _________________ Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MNOWAX
0.999... of a Troll
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 4:38 am Post subject: 208 |
|
|
| Jedo the Jedi wrote: |
So far, all I've heard is a supposed Freudian slip which wouldn't be suspicious on any Day but this one. MNO's situation would be scummy on any Day.
And answering the accusations is not deflecting. That's better than MNO who had to be significantly pressed before he gave any kind of response to the questions leveled against him. |
What the hell are you talking about? I've answered every question that was put to me. _________________ The Man The Myth The Legend
MNOWAX |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sniklac16
Spaciest of aides
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 5:43 am Post subject: 209 |
|
|
I apologize! When I mod a game I prefer to watch everything unfold, as opposed to getting involved at all. If you guys want me to do a little more I will. _________________ What lies behind us and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 11:07 am Post subject: 210 |
|
|
| I'd love to see a vote count on every page, but otherwise I think you're doing great. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 12:17 pm Post subject: 211 |
|
|
| Zag wrote: |
| I'd love to see a vote count on every page, but otherwise I think you're doing great. |
Ditto.
| MNOWAX wrote: |
| What the hell are you talking about? I've answered every question that was put to me. |
You're right. That's why I said "had to be significantly pressed before he gave any kind of response." That means you did respond, just not immediately. Either you people (you know who you are) have significant trouble reading, or you are super defensive. If it's the latter, why is that? _________________ Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Garou_Kinfolk
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 3:16 pm Post subject: 212 |
|
|
| Jedo the Jedi wrote: |
| You know what, Amb and Garou, I can handle your accusations. I think most people realize that they aren't well-grounded in the facts. It appears neither of you are actually reading my posts for comprehension, and I daresay you are both suffering from confirmation bias. |
Sorry I hadn't replied to this sooner. I had to step away from it for a while. Being told that I'm not reading someone's posts, I've found, is quite offensive to me. I read ALL of the posts, even the bits that are quoted. When I get to a computer instead of my phone, I'll be able to show you that I have.
And yes, I do find MNOWAXs actions to be a little off, but ge hadn't gone against his own, repeatedly stated, public policy, like you have. This also isn't the first wagon. My previous quote of yours shows that you even said there was another wagon on Raekuul that was desolving.
I'd like to continue to post, but I'm reaching my character limit and I have to finish getting ready for work. To be continued. _________________ Most posts made from my phone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MNOWAX
0.999... of a Troll
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 4:02 pm Post subject: 213 |
|
|
| Jedo the Jedi wrote: |
| MNOWAX wrote: |
| What the hell are you talking about? I've answered every question that was put to me. |
You're right. That's why I said "had to be significantly pressed before he gave any kind of response." That means you did respond, just not immediately. Either you people (you know who you are) have significant trouble reading, or you are super defensive. If it's the latter, why is that? |
whoa wait, who pressed me? the mod? I came in to play as soon as I was prodded! that's not significant pressure. as soon as i came in, i answered questions and even claimed.
here's a question jedo can answer for us, why are you so gang ho about lynching me so quickly? You helped to get me up to L-4 without asking for a prod ( IIRC i believe GK did, but it certainly wasn't you) I really had no posts since the confirm, and you know me to be a talkative player.
you did it for one of three reasons: 1: You're scum and I'm good for any scum because i'm always a good lynch target 2: You wanted a claim from me to figure ouit the secret theme 3: you didn't want a replacement coming in, rather a dead body.
Anything I miss? the first makes you scum the other two makes you anti town at best. _________________ The Man The Myth The Legend
MNOWAX |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 4:15 pm Post subject: 214 |
|
|
| Garou_Kinfolk wrote: |
| And yes, I do find MNOWAXs actions to be a little off, but ge hadn't gone against his own, repeatedly stated, public policy, like you have. This also isn't the first wagon. My previous quote of yours shows that you even said there was another wagon on Raekuul that was desolving. |
I haven't gone against my "own, repeatedly stated, public policy," and I've yet to see a reasonably good argument that I have. If there is one, I'll gladly demonstrate the contrary from my own posts. Oh wait, I have demonstrated that I still support my policy about Day 1 claims.
| Jedo the Jedi wrote: |
| Second, I don't want him to claim for the sake of the claim. As the post highlights, the point is that he is threatening to claim very far from being the actual lynch, and I want somebody to call his ridiculous bluff. Your usage of that against me is scum just looking for a reason to distract from his buddy. |
Also, I already confessed to the semantics about the "raekuul wagon" in the same post as the above quote.
| Jedo the Jedi wrote: |
| First, raekuul was only a wagon in the technical sense of the term: there were three people (plus raekuul himself). raekuul almost immediately unvoted himself. So, if you want to argue semantics, you've caught me in a contradiction, but MNO is the first real wagon of the day. |
Having addressed both of those, I'm still left with my previous conclusion that you aren't reading for comprehension. As you'll notice, I was very specific about my wording. I believe you are allowing the image of the words to pass through your eyes, but I don't believe you are processing them. If it's a matter of misunderstanding or disagreeing, that would be entirely different, but considering how you like to continue bringing up the same points (nearly verbatim), I doubt it is either of those. _________________ Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 4:34 pm Post subject: 215 |
|
|
| MNOWAX wrote: |
| whoa wait, who pressed me? the mod? I came in to play as soon as I was prodded! that's not significant pressure. as soon as i came in, i answered questions and even claimed. |
Never mind that your quick claim is part of the problem, this post by Raearia is a good summation of the unanswered accusations against you. (The accusations were there prior to this post.) The most important aspect isn't stated in the form of a question, but the question is still there, unanswered.
| Raearia wrote: |
MNO you still have yet to give any reasonable arguments to your absence(excluding the time frame you said you would be gone). You are getting overly defensive over people finding your actions questionable. Saying if you get one more vote on you you are going to role claim? Is this just a ploy to call scum on the next person to vote you and feel you are justified in doing so?
Regardless of your post, I still gave you a chance to give really valid arguments for yourself and all you are doing is calling "BS" on people finding your actions questionable like I said earlier. |
-----------------
| MNOWAX wrote: |
| here's a question jedo can answer for us, why are you so gang ho about lynching me so quickly? You helped to get me up to L-4 without asking for a prod ( IIRC i believe GK did, but it certainly wasn't you) I really had no posts since the confirm, and you know me to be a talkative player. |
I'll take this in order. First, I'm not "gung ho" about lynching you "so quickly." I'm not sure why this accusation is consistently leveled against me. I am convinced of your scumminess, but that doesn't mean that I'm pressuring everybody to lynch you immediately. I think you should be the lynch for today, whenever that comes about. Until then, I will continually point out the strikes against you and discuss whatever else may come along. Hopefully enough people eventually will see the logic to my words and follow suit.
Second, I already answered why I didn't ask the mod for a prod. There was plenty of evidence that you should have known you were in this game. (You confirmed in here, you know we only run one game at a time so you should have looked in here after the other game ended, you posted in the Vacation thread when you weren't active in the other game which would be pointless unless you knew you were in this game, etc.) All of that plus my knowledge that you are a talkative player (except when you are scum or have a power you believe is valuable) led me to believe you were intentionally lurking as scum. No prod necessary, and in fact I pointed out that Garou was just giving you options to excuse your behavior with his post which was to the same effect as your critique here.
So, 1: I'm not scum, but I'm pretty sure you are 2: I don't give a damn about your claim other than that you follow through with your threat (which you did) and 3: There's no need for a replacement when you were intentionally lurking.
Satisfied? _________________ Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Garou_Kinfolk
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 5:51 pm Post subject: 216 |
|
|
Jedo, I don't believe the problem is comprehension. I believe it is a misunderstanding. As such, can you please post your Day 1 roleclaim policy so everyone knows what it is and we (town) can determin if you went against it when encouraging others to vote MNOWAX to "call his bluvv" and see if he would claim. _________________ Most posts made from my phone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 6:47 pm Post subject: 217 |
|
|
This seems like a pretty good articulation of my position regarding Day 1 claims.
| Jedo the Jedi in Survivor Mafia wrote: |
Wow. I know you have been away for a while, TGC, but we don't claim around here until at least L-2. I know you think this was all moving so quickly and you were about to be lynched, but you were still a significant number of votes away from being lynched. What surely was going to happen is others were going to come in on your behalf and say how ridiculously quick this was and vote somebody on your wagon, chalking it up to having a lame excuse for getting on the wagon. Then the tide would have turned, and you would have been fine.
For the record, I'm not afraid of your claim. It's the reason I don't believe claims on Day 1: they are designed to scare the town into unvoting. If you had claimed "cop," people would be unvoting because they are afraid to lose such a powerful townie. Pfft. We'll survive. |
This might also suffice.
| Jedo the Jedi in Game of Thrones Mafia wrote: |
| My official stance throughout history of play has been we lynch Day 1 regardless. If the person seemed scummy before the claim, what difference should the claim itself make? As some have pointed out, scum can have fake claims, and it isn't uncommon for them to fake roles either. I see little reason to change here. |
And just for ease of reference, here are the posts I have made regarding the matter this game. Let's hear the objection.
| Jedo the Jedi wrote: |
| Please, please, somebody vote MNO. I want to see him claim at L-3. Seriously, that screams like scum even more than before. You have only half of the necessary votes, and you are the first wagon of the day, which we know will fall apart as always. The fact that you are making such a big deal about this only adds to the suspicion. |
| Quote: |
| Second, I don't want him to claim for the sake of the claim. As the post highlights, the point is that he is threatening to claim very far from being the actual lynch, and I want somebody to call his ridiculous bluff. Your usage of that against me is scum just looking for a reason to distract from his buddy. |
_________________ Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sniklac16
Spaciest of aides
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 6:56 pm Post subject: 218 |
|
|
| Zag wrote: |
| I'd love to see a vote count on every page, but otherwise I think you're doing great. |
I apologize, I'll try to do more votes counts. However if I do one vote count on one page and there was only a change or 2 on the next, I don't find it necessary to do another one. _________________ What lies behind us and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Garou_Kinfolk
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 7:43 pm Post subject: 219 |
|
|
I think I see where the misunderstanding is, and it's on my end. I had thought your policy was something along the lines of "People shouldn't claim day 1." when it's actually along the lines of "Day 1 claims should be ignored and the lynch go on through." Am I correct in this?
MNOWAX, you actually posted 3 times before the game started. There was a vote for Amb and confirmation in the first one, something about Raearia not trusting you in the second, and then you voted for Jedo in the third.
Jedo: I have taken a look at who voted where and when and have found a total of 5 wagons as defined by you earlier (3 or more votes). The first was Raekuul with 4 (not the 3 you have been saying), this includes his joke vote for himself. The second was Esme with another 4 votes. Zag came next with 3. The final two are MNOWAX with 5 currently and yourself with 4. There is more information within the vote record as well, such as Dragon Phoenix voting for 5 different people and voting TGC twice in a row at the start. _________________ Most posts made from my phone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
spyrl
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 8:22 pm Post subject: 220 |
|
|
Jedo, I tend to be one of the most analytical people I know, highly detail oriented and adept at comprehensive reading. In your crusade against MNO, and also Amb/Garou, I have been getting a similar feeling to your battle against LIML in the (ironically enough) previous Secret theme game. This isn't enough to make vote you (not by a good amount) or do more than go "hmmm" and make a note of it.
This is compounded by your repeated "you're not reading my posts" comments. It always strikes a wrong chord with me when someone rails against others demanding that they read (or didn't read) their posts. Just because we came to a different conclusion from reading the same words doesn't mean that we didn't read it.
I'm also finding it odd that in the Heroes vs Villains game you had such a different reaction to an early claim. You rolled your eyes at Zag, but didn't attack him like you have with MNO. That's not to say that I don't find MNO's early claim odd, I do, but I've played enough with MNO to know that when he says he's going to do something we can see in the forum, he does it. However, I see this claim almost as if MNO really doesn't want to play (he said he had intended to take a break) and is just looking for a quick lynch or NK as way out.
Last, as a side note, anytime someone brings up the word semantics, it's been my experience that the one making the most fuss about it is usually the scum. _________________ "And all those exclamation marks, you notice? Five? A sure sign of someone who wears his underpants on his head." Terry Pratchett, Maskerade
Discworld Mafia is here! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dragon Phoenix
Judge Doom
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 8:45 pm Post subject: 221 |
|
|
For now I tend to believe Mnowax, and I have Jedo in the town vibes corner. I would still love to see either Zag or raekuul be the first lynch of the game. _________________ My photography:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/artrock2006/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Amb
Amb the Hitched.
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 9:02 pm Post subject: 222 |
|
|
We aren't actually getting anywhere, and I am not opposed to bandwagonning and claims. (Jedo may or may not be, his posts are apparently confusing and say the opposite to how they read).
If I had to, by force, choose between Zag and Raekuul - then I'd string up Raekuul. Otherwise this game might turn into a text adventure  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sentran
Ray of Sucking Funshine
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 9:38 pm Post subject: 223 |
|
|
| Jedo the Jedi wrote: |
| It's the reason I don't believe claims on Day 1: they are designed to scare the town into unvoting. |
| Jedo the Jedi wrote: |
| I want to see him claim at L-3. |
This appears to be contradictory to me. Jedo does not like Day 1 claims, speaks vehemently against them in multiple games, but still wants to see MNO's claim. If I wasn't already voting Jedo, this would sway my vote to him.
| Jedo the Jedi wrote: |
| Let this stand as evidence that Amb hasn't understood the things of mine which he has quoted. |
| Jedo the Jedi wrote: |
| It appears neither of you are actually reading my posts for comprehension, and I daresay you are both suffering from confirmation bias. |
Perhaps if multiple players are having this much trouble understanding you, you should attempt to explain yourself more clearly. As has been already stated, there are worlds of difference between understanding and agreement.
DP, I seem to see this from the opposite corner as you. I think Jedo or possibly MNO are the best options for today. _________________ Sentran
"Speaking of double negatives, I haven't read greylab yet today." - Lifeinmomland |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 9:56 pm Post subject: 224 |
|
|
Garou, I will affirm your final assessment of my policy, but there are nuances. I think it's inevitable that people will claim (you can't all be stubbornly stoic like I was in Survivor Mafia), so I don't think they should claim until L-1. (My above quote says L-2 because that's what I've noticed is generally true for everybody else.)
As for the wagons, I can only plead ignorance. I didn't go through looking for the number of votes until I felt we had had so many vote changes that it was unclear where anybody was. I believe I even said something to the effect of wanting a vote count so I could know which wagon I was supposed to be joining. So, thank you for the illuminating information about the voting history. As you may have noticed, I settled on MNO for reasons other than wagoning, something I've also been known to do when a particularly scummy thing appears on Day 1. I will clarify that I said raekuul had three votes plus his own which means four.
spyrl, I know the backlash people have against "not reading my posts" comments, and that's why I tried to specify. I don't believe Amb or Garou was reading my posts to understand what I was saying (comprehension) but only to find what they viewed as inconsistencies (confirmation bias/strawman ammo). I hope you would agree there is a difference, and given Garou's recent confession (and Amb's perpetuation of a falsity), see that what I'm saying is true. Maybe you will maintain that it was a "different understanding," but if that's the case, it's at least a situation where they don't want to understand what I mean. That's antagonistic, and I think it still falls under the criterion I listed above.
Amb, how exactly is it confusing? Have you not played with me long enough to know my Day 1 policies and read my rants against the system? Your "analysis" above is seriously lacking in any attempt actually to interpret what I have said.
1) The comment about "speeding the process along" is a jab at the foolish methods the majority of players employ in their Day 1 strategy. It's in the same vein of what I said in Survivor when you claimed.
2) I get irate when multiple power roles are outed on Day 1 (as the quote clearly says), so how exactly was my own action contributing to "making myself irate" in that sense?
3) You never showed where I was "for and against bandwagons." I am for bandwagons.
4) I said your vote was reasonable from your perspective, when it was just about the Freudian slip. It's interesting that you had to take my quote out of context in order to make me look inconsistent.
5) Yes, so that "the town can dissolve his wagon and start another." That's not my preference, but I'm fatalistic in that that is what the rest of you will do despite mine (and Monk's) historical arguments to the contrary. How well did it serve you guys in Survivor to out all those roles then lynch the cop?
Any other deliberate twisting and misreading of my posts you want me to debunk for you? _________________ Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 10:08 pm Post subject: 225 |
|
|
Sentran, the bold is used as emphasis. I'm highlighting the ridiculousness of MNO's threat to claim so early. I know we've had a discussion about tone already, but you can write sarcasm into a post and others can interpret it properly. You are being intentionally obtuse.
Half of you participate in those cryptics, so why don't you utilize your amazing skills of deduction to understand posts here?
"Please, please" is a hint that I'm feigning begging.
"at L-3" is demonstrating the emphasis of my clue.
The claim is just the catalyst. He shouldn't really be claiming at all, so other people should see the scum ploy he is telegraphing way ahead of time. MNO is straight up manipulating how the town will react to his claim. I know what you guys will do (historically) and he does too. Kudos to him for the attempt, but you shouldn't be suckered into it.
Last game, I said exactly what I would do if such-and-such situation was the state of affairs the next day--I'll investigate either Sentran or Zag. If one comes up innocent, I'll lead the lynch on the other. That allowed the scum to play perfectly into that scenario: Sentran didn't have to do anything knowing he would come up innocent. The thing is I changed my tactic because the results seemed too perfect for just such a situation as Sentran being a GF. I will say it again, don't be suckered.
And that's not contradictory even at the literal level because I didn't say I would believe his claim if he made it. _________________ Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Amb
Amb the Hitched.
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 10:11 pm Post subject: 226 |
|
|
This is my problem:
| Quote: |
| Any other deliberate twisting and misreading of my posts you want me to debunk for you? |
Why do you assume I am doing it deliberately. If you post in such a way that your point is obscured, and you look like scum - then you swing.
| Quote: |
| and that's why I tried to specify. I don't believe Amb or Garou was reading my posts to understand what I was saying (comprehension) but only to find what they viewed as inconsistencies (confirmation bias/strawman ammo |
You are taking the line very strongly that anyone who suspects you must be scum. If you are genuinely town, then you aren't really even trying to understand. Town players are looking for scum, and if they find someone and label them incorrectly as scum, that doesn't mean they are deliberately twisting things.
| Quote: |
| As you may have noticed, I settled on MNO for reasons other than wagoning, something I've also been known to do when a particularly scummy thing appears on Day |
And yet when I do the same, I'm deliberative and twisting?
See the problem? Your problem isn't us, it's you.
I have no clue whether you are town or scum. But if you carry on calling out people for being scummy, while ignoring or trying to brush off your own scumminess, then you will carry on being in the centre of everyone's attention. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 11:00 pm Post subject: 227 |
|
|
| Amb wrote: |
| Why do you assume I am doing it deliberately. |
Did you see my example of how I could have twisted Garou's post to paint him as scum? A usual reading of that wouldn't produce any thoughts of the sort. If I'm achieving a different reading, how am I getting there? I'm not saying there aren't ambiguous phrases, but I am saying there are some phrases which cannot reasonably be interpreted differently. Your comment about my "Freudian slip" is a legitimate option for an ambiguous phrase (although I know what I meant by it and that I'm not scum), but that isn't true for all of your interpretive efforts.
| Quote: |
| You are taking the line very strongly that anyone who suspects you must be scum. |
Except I'm not, and I'm saying this is an example of deliberate twisting. I accused Garou of being scum for his defense of MNO's actions and giving MNO an excuse for his absence before MNO even responded. I later reemphasized this notion when I again felt Garou was trying to distract from the scumminess of MNO.
| Quote: |
| If you are genuinely town, then you aren't really even trying to understand. |
We should be to a certain extent. Did you see what happened last game with the lack of understanding of Zag and raekuul? Again, if I wasn't trying to understand, I could just paint Garou as scum for not waiting for the mod's reply before placing his vote again. Instead, I recognize what he meant and am not pressing him on it. Don't get me wrong, I think he is likely scum for other reasons (and I'm certainly scrutinizing his posts), but I'm not going to twist that to help my case.
| Quote: |
And yet when I do the same, I'm deliberative and twisting?
See the problem? Your problem isn't us, it's you. |
No, I don't see where I have twisted something MNO said to paint him as scum. In fact, I've continually highlighted the inconsistencies of his story. Have you heard a good explanation for those things? I haven't, and that's why I'm voting him and encouraging others to do so.
So, I don't really mind being the center of attention, as long as you look past me to the scum I've virtually caught. I haven't brushed off accusations. In fact, I've faced them head-on and pointed out how they are incorrect. What more can I do? I've defended myself, but once somebody has a position in their head they rarely change it. (For example with the last game, in order for me to be scum, one had also to assume I was a complete moron in terms of mafia play. That still didn't stop people from being suspicious of the most cleared person in the game barring an investigation.) _________________ Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 11:02 pm Post subject: 228 |
|
|
I should also clarify: my example of the cryptics was not to suggest that I'm trying to be intentionally unclear. It was simply to say that those of you who participate in that are obviously intelligent enough to see past literal text to the true meaning...even without voice inflection. _________________ Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sentran
Ray of Sucking Funshine
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 11:32 pm Post subject: 229 |
|
|
| Jedo the Jedi wrote: |
| As for the wagons, I can only plead ignorance. |
So what I'm inferring from this is that you need to read the posts for comprehension. [/sarcasm]
| Jedo the Jedi wrote: |
| Half of you participate in those cryptics, so why don't you utilize your amazing skills of deduction to understand posts here? |
Your post did not sound at all sarcastic to me. From this bit of your post, I believe I am not being intentionally obtuse, but you are being intentionally misleading/confusing. Again, if more than one person is not understanding your meaning, perhaps you should attempt to be more clear.
[pre-post edit] I see that you already responded to the issue of the clarity, and I appreciate that. It's not enough to make me change my vote on you, but at least it looks like you're listening.
To be honest, I don't entirely disagree with your "no claims on day 1" theory, but I am not 100% sold on it either. I still think it's up to each individual player to choose when to claim. It's their right as a player. _________________ Sentran
"Speaking of double negatives, I haven't read greylab yet today." - Lifeinmomland |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 11:52 pm Post subject: 230 |
|
|
| Sentran wrote: |
| Jedo the Jedi wrote: |
| As for the wagons, I can only plead ignorance. |
So what I'm inferring from this is that you need to read the posts for comprehension. [/sarcasm] |
See, I think most people could have figured out that was sarcasm without you making it explicit. That's because most people use context for interpretation.
I thought I would use another example to illustrate. If somebody says, "What lovely weather!" when it is raining, you might be unsure whether they are serious. This would be an ambiguous statement because they could indeed enjoy rainy weather. However, if you knew previously that they hate rain, you would understand them to be saying that sarcastically.
I think the same should be reasonably true of myself. Most of you have played with me often enough (and read my soapbox posts game after game) to know how I feel about bandwagons and claims on Day 1. If I say, "Please, please...I want MNO to claim at L-3," you already have the proper interpretive lens to understand that I don't want the claim (at least not as such). I would argue if you who know me are interpreting it differently, then you are doing so intentionally with respect to ignoring what you know about me.
Now, Amb, I don't find you particularly scummy, at least not for your suspicion of me. What I do think is that you have found me scummy for the "Freudian slip" and are looking for other things to back up your view. Because of confirmation bias, you are likely to misinterpret deliberately my "desire for a claim" instead of integrating what you already know about me. I mean, I'm pretty sure I'm one of the most consistent players on the board in terms of my game theory and its application. _________________ Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Garou_Kinfolk
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 12:19 am Post subject: 231 |
|
|
So I'm on my phone, doing a reread and I had a thought about this post after reading it and that Jedo is now, and has been, saying I gave MNO an out with asking the mod to prod MNO. It's a partial because of my character limit.
| Jedo the Jedi wrote: |
| Garou_Kinfolk wrote: |
| I agree that it is tempting to vote him so Snicklack doesn't have to worry about a replacement. |
Since this is the second mention, I will address this: an attitude like this is not helpful to town. It's not inherently scummy (especially since Garou's post reads as a mischievous thought rather than any actual intention), but it is definitely better to replace and have a contributing member. Who knows? That slot may be a useful power, and somebody else could come along and help the town with their information and dialogue. |
I ask this, why was it soo bad to ask the mod to prod him when there's a post like this? I wasn't there for the game you mention in your next post, so saying this post is moot doesn't make sense to me. _________________ Most posts made from my phone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 12:49 am Post subject: 232 |
|
|
| Garou_Kinfolk wrote: |
| I ask this, why was it soo bad to ask the mod to prod him when there's a post like this? |
Here's the thing: I don't give much credence to lurking as being scummy...until it appears intentional. For example, I don't currently suspect Leonidas for not being around because he hasn't been posting elsewhere on the board. I also don't suspect Monk even though I've seen him around over the weekend. He had been V/LA and might be waiting for a block of time to process all that he missed at once. Monk also has a history of good contribution, so he gets the benefit of the doubt. (However, come Monday or Tuesday morning, I expect Monk to have posted.) These are the distinctions.
I was willing to believe the same of MNO, until he posted elsewhere. His story doesn't add up with the vacation posting and his consistent contribution to the mafia forum. I feel like your decision to "be official" and go through the mod was a way to discredit my suspicion. Of course the first thing MNO was going to say when he came in here was that he didn't know he was in the game. That's why you have to look past what he said to the circumstances. It seemed you would rather view only what the mod and MNO say, even though it was inconsistent. _________________ Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
raekuul
Lives under a bridge & tells stories.
|
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 1:18 am Post subject: 233 |
|
|
| MNOWAX: Why were you so eager to claim this game? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Amb
Amb the Hitched.
|
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 1:24 am Post subject: 234 |
|
|
I'm also consistent. Consistently lynch happy. eg. Given the chance to hammer, I always hammer. Probably doesnt gain me friends though.
I want to put this argument away now anyway. It's not going anywhere, and clearly noone (other than Sentran) wants to follow me on it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
spyrl
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 1:29 am Post subject: 235 |
|
|
| Sentran, post 86 wrote: |
| I'm not trying to follow Jedo and UM (because I'm frequently at odds with one or both of them), but on this point I agree. Claiming on day 1 only gives ammo to the Mafia, making it harder for the town to win. I also acknowledge that this is a change from my previous opinion that a player may claim whenever they like. I still believe that point as well, but I don't think day 1 is the proper time. |
| Sentran, post 229 wrote: |
| To be honest, I don't entirely disagree with your "no claims on day 1" theory, but I am not 100% sold on it either. I still think it's up to each individual player to choose when to claim. It's their right as a player. |
What changed between post 86 and 229 to cause you to reverse your earlier statement where you straight forward said that you agreed with the "no claims day 1" and 229, where you seem much more ambiguous about the "no claims day 1"? Personally, I feel that it's every players' choice about when to claim, whether it's L-2, L-3, or L-whenever. It's like voting, I don't have to like who they vote for, but that's their right to choose who to vote for.
| Jedo the Jedi wrote: |
| (However, come Monday or Tuesday morning, I expect Monk to have posted.) |
Do you mean today and tomorrow, or are you talking about next weeks Tuesday and Wednesday? _________________ "And all those exclamation marks, you notice? Five? A sure sign of someone who wears his underpants on his head." Terry Pratchett, Maskerade
Discworld Mafia is here! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 2:22 am Post subject: 236 |
|
|
Today is Monday, isn't it? My weekend was thrown off by having today off. I do indeed mean by tomorrow morning, afternoon at most. _________________ Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 2:29 am Post subject: 237 |
|
|
Actually, I just realized this is Veteran's Day, so I would give until Wednesday for Monk. The whole point was not everybody frequents the board on weekends. _________________ Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sentran
Ray of Sucking Funshine
|
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 8:11 am Post subject: 238 |
|
|
| spyrl wrote: |
| What changed between post 86 and 229 to cause you to reverse your earlier statement where you straight forward said that you agreed with the "no claims day 1" and 229, where you seem much more ambiguous about the "no claims day 1"? Personally, I feel that it's every players' choice about when to claim, whether it's L-2, L-3, or L-whenever. It's like voting, I don't have to like who they vote for, but that's their right to choose who to vote for. |
What changed? Two weeks of consideration and an election. To be more specific, I feel it is a clarification of my thinking rather than a change. I still don't think it's a great idea for a lot of people to claim on day 1, but I will defend a person's right to choose when to claim on their own.
In my mind, it's similar to the pro-life/pro-choice argument here in America. While I am personally against abortion, I don't believe I have the right to make that decision for anyone else, hence why I claim pro-choice. _________________ Sentran
"Speaking of double negatives, I haven't read greylab yet today." - Lifeinmomland |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
3iff
very unbifflike
|
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 8:27 am Post subject: 239 |
|
|
That was a busy weekend...I've skimmed the posts since Friday and will certainly have to read them again but here's a few thoughts for now.
Garou: Chasing the mod for replacements doesn't look very good, especially on day 1.
Jedo: I find myself tending to agree with what you're saying (I know that will seem scummy to others ). I read your MNO claim line as "I can't believe MNO would even think about claiming at L-3", and yet he did so, almost in defiance of your statement.
MNO: Utterly utterly untrustworthy. He's 'offed' me in many of my games and yet I consistently seem to be gullible enough to trust him (he's brilliant at fooling people) but his ridiculously early claim as well as his belated gamestart (because he forgot?)...I don't buy it.
More thoughts later this morning. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
3iff
very unbifflike
|
Posted: Tue Nov 13, 2012 10:51 am Post subject: 240 |
|
|
MNO:
Post 172: "Seriously, I didn't even know I was in the game.". Are you expecting anyone to believe this? You're better than that, surely (cue joke about "don't call me Shirley")
Then you FoS the people voting for you before you bother to turn up (and call them scum for good measure)?
Finally you direct people towards lynching Amb?
You told me you had been following H&V mafia before you became involved in that game, so I know you follow games you're not playing in (as do I). So I'd bet that you were following this game too. It wouldn't take much for you to realise that you WERE supposed to be participating!
Post180:
| Quote: |
right off the bat i get strong town vibes from DP and Zag. I always think Amb is scummy as with Jedo, although this game i really suspect him.
Pushing me to lynch is quite scummy, i think, and honestly in a game of this size I wouldn't put it past seeing the entire lynch mob on me being scum driven. That's more conjecture than anything, but that's how i feel.
|
Redirection and flimflammery.
Jedo:
post186
| Quote: |
| Please, please, somebody vote MNO. I want to see him claim at L-3. Seriously, that screams like scum even more than before. |
post189
| Quote: |
| As the post highlights, the point is that he is threatening to claim very far from being the actual lynch, and I want somebody to call his ridiculous bluff. |
MNO does in fact do so with a fairly solid town claim. But this early in the game? Ridiculous. Even I wouldn't do that so early in a lynch run and I would hint at a useful power...not say it straight out.
Garou:
Posts163&166
Wanting to know about replacements. Why? That's something for the Mod to worry about.
Then he criticises Jedo for not asking the same question about replacements. Odd.
Asking for MNO to be prodded is fine, but a PM to the mod would have been just as effective...unless you WANT to show that you are wanting MNO to be prodded.
spyrl:
Post220
| Quote: |
| However, I see this claim almost as if MNO really doesn't want to play (he said he had intended to take a break) and is just looking for a quick lynch or NK as way out. |
I can't believe that someone of the calibre of MNO would deliberately try and get himself lynched because he doesn't want to play a game.
Sentran:
post229
| Quote: |
| From this bit of your post, I believe I am not being intentionally obtuse, but you are being intentionally misleading/confusing. Again, if more than one person is not understanding your meaning, perhaps you should attempt to be more clear. |
I don't understand the problem. I see Jedo's posts as quite clear and yet far too many players are apparently misreading his posts (on purpose?) and moaning about them.
| Quote: |
| To be honest, I don't entirely disagree with your "no claims on day 1" theory, but I am not 100% sold on it either. I still think it's up to each individual player to choose when to claim. It's their right as a player. |
Of course it is and players will claim when they consider it appropriate.
However, a claim in itself is of little worth until it's proven to be true and beneficial to the town. In GoT, Deception claimed a powerful town role and town name and was lynched despite that. For MNO to claim town roleblocker this early and with so little pressure smacks of...desperation?
Unless Jedo is trying to emulate the immensly chatty Mackay fron Survivor mafia, then after all the posts he's made he's more likely to be town.
My view on certain players so far: I accept that I could be very wrong...
Townish: Jedo
Slightly townish or scumish: Amb, Dragon Phoenix
Scumish: MNO, Garou
Far too quiet: TGC, esme, Leonidas, Undercover Monk. (I accept some may be genuinely absent)
The remaining players I have no view on at the moment. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|