|
|
|
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
3iff
very unbifflike
|
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 8:44 am Post subject: 321 |
|
|
That was a long night...
Delighted at getting MNO straight away. I owed him a kill or two for the times he's got me in the past. Right, now to find the next mafia target.
Garou post 320: Interesting views on Sentran. I see what you're getting at. I'll have a closer look.
Sentran post 316: "I looked to see if anyone had voted MNO then unvoted, but I could not find any."
I voted for MNO in the random stage, switched elsewhere and then came back to him and stayed there - and I was essentially the first to have a solid vote on him. I'm not claiming I 'got' him but I did bring his activities out in the open.
Some of you lurkers...can you post? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 1:02 pm Post subject: 322 |
|
|
| Garou_Kinfolk wrote: |
| MNOWAX "comes into" the game and follows a scum buddies vote. Since he voted for Jedo in that same post he came in with and didn't change it at all, that leaves only Amb and Sentran as those who were voting for Jedo at that time. With Amb dead and confirmed town, that just leaves Sentran (you) for the only one who MNOWAX could follow. |
Maybe. It's also possible it was just OMGUS. The thinking being that if he could make himself look like a victim he could get me lynched instead. I'm not sure which is more likely from MNO.
| Garou_Kinfolk wrote: |
| Jedo the Jedi wrote: |
| Plus, I don't think it's particularly good policy to look only at the lynch in the case of a town flip or only against the lynch in the case of scum. It's either naive that you think there are not scum opposing a town lynch or bussing their buddy, or you are protecting your buddy(s) on the lynch. I think you have played enough not to be naive. |
Could you please clarify this? I've read it about a dozen times and haven't been able to wrap my head around it. Thanks. |
The way your post read it said you would look at X group if MNO was scum and Y group if he was town. I felt like you were setting yourself up to overlook your buddies because you knew what MNO would flip. The other option is it was a naive statement.
It's hard for me to go along with your Sentran analysis for two reasons: 1) I've been mistaken with my Sentran reads lately, so I'm leery about my thoughts being wrong; and 2) I still don't really trust you. That post was a decent response, but I'm not ready to distrust my gut with you. _________________ Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sentran
Ray of Sucking Funshine
|
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 6:48 pm Post subject: 323 |
|
|
I feel like Garou's wall of text and vote for me was an attempt to justify an OMGUS vote. Still, I'm looking through the thread to see if anything else stands out. With 2 kills, it's a good bet that one was Mafia and one was not. I'm wondering if the other kill was due to SK or Vig, and why the target was Amb/Zag. Has anyone else noticed anything that would make either of them appear particularly town or scum? So far, the closest I've found is that Amb's frequent flipping made him appear more scum than town. That would lean towards a Vig kill there. Still, they're both good players, so I could see reasons for Mafia to want to get rid of either of them early.
3iff, I was only counting votes from when the MNO wagon appeared serious. I was not looking for RVS unvotes of MNO. Thank you for the info anyway. _________________ Sentran
"Speaking of double negatives, I haven't read greylab yet today." - Lifeinmomland |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Garou_Kinfolk
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 9:41 pm Post subject: 324 |
|
|
Thanks Jedo for clarifying that. It makes sense now. If you look at just the first couple of lines your assessment would be pretty decent, but the following line says I'll be looking at ALL of his interactions. I thought most people would assume from that that the previous lines would be the group of players that I'd look closest at among all of MNOWAXs interactions. My mistake for not being clearer there.
The rest of your post reads that all I'm doing is placing an OMGUS vote and justifying it because it goes against your gut.
When I think about it, I honestly can't remember the last time Jedo made a gut vote. Is there anything else to tour vote?
Sentran, I expected more of a rebuttal then what your post says. If I had to summarize it, it would be "The wall post is OMGUS justification. OH LOOK! A DISTRACTION FROM IT!" I really did expect to wake up this morning to find something more then a brush off. _________________ Most posts made from my phone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sentran
Ray of Sucking Funshine
|
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 10:06 pm Post subject: 325 |
|
|
| Garou_Kinfolk wrote: |
| Sentran, I expected more of a rebuttal then what your post says. If I had to summarize it, it would be "The wall post is OMGUS justification. OH LOOK! A DISTRACTION FROM IT!" I really did expect to wake up this morning to find something more then a brush off. |
You expected more than a brush off? Why? I'm more interested in finding the remaining scum (I'm fairly sure there's more than one) then to spend my time responding to your false reads. I'm also looking for links between you and other players. If I wear blinders to everything except one player, I will have little to go on in following days. _________________ Sentran
"Speaking of double negatives, I haven't read greylab yet today." - Lifeinmomland |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Garou_Kinfolk
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 10:07 pm Post subject: 326 |
|
|
There's more I'd like to add, but I hit my character limit and my break ended.
To Be Continued... _________________ Most posts made from my phone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Raearia
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 10:15 pm Post subject: 327 |
|
|
After reading through and rereading posts:
I don't like being called a lurker in a game I feel I have been participating in, but I understand needing to draw a line on what is and what isn't.
I feel like I have nothing to add to the current conversation between Sentran and Garou as of yet.
So I don't want to post for postings sake about it.
What I am worried about is loosing two power roles for us townies in both Zag and Amb and I don't want to be in the habit of making the mistake of us lynching a townie. While I know it is a higher chance to lynch a townie I really want to be careful in trusting my gut as well as what I am interpreting in this thread to make that chance less likely. _________________ 10289 is the end! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
spyrl
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 11:20 pm Post subject: 328 |
|
|
Well, that really throws a monkey wrench into things. I had several ideas sketched out, but they're not applicable now. Re: the Jedo, Garou, Sentran conversation. I think Garou brings up a good point. Sentran, you were going at Jedo tooth and nail yesterday believing him scum, yet today it seems that you're just merrily going along with his findings. I find that even more suspicious considering Jedo's main reason for voting for Garou is this:
| Jedo the Jedi wrote: |
| Personally, I'm going to vote: Garou_Kinfolk. Now that MNO is confirmed scum, I do believe I was right in thinking that Garou was trying to help out his buddy. Garou kept his vote on me for most of the day (because of what he later admitted was a misunderstanding), then strangely unvoted near the end of the day without taking a stance on the MNO lynch. The only reservation I have is that it seems so blatant, but that isn't currently enough to sway me away from this view. |
The only reservation he has about it, is that it's so "blatant". How is it that Garou's stance on MNO is any less "blatant" than something like Jedo's hard drive to get the lynch of MNO? It seems like it is two sides of the same coin to me, both things being something too "blatant" for experienced mafia players to do as scum. _________________ "And all those exclamation marks, you notice? Five? A sure sign of someone who wears his underpants on his head." Terry Pratchett, Maskerade
Discworld Mafia is here! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 11:21 pm Post subject: 329 |
|
|
| Garou_Kinfolk wrote: |
The rest of your post reads that all I'm doing is placing an OMGUS vote and justifying it because it goes against your gut.
When I think about it, I honestly can't remember the last time Jedo made a gut vote. Is there anything else to tour vote? |
I don't think I said anything about your vote for Sentran being OMGUS. Maybe you are combining mine and Sentran's posts.
As for "my gut," I've been having RL conversations which I think will help me articulate what I mean. On the Meyers-Brigs personality inventory, I am an INFJ. One of the characteristics is that my brain takes in loads of information and processes it for me subconsciously and creates an "intuitive" conclusion. Sometimes I can pick out some of the steps, but not always.
Therefore, "my gut" read against you is that I think I see some of the steps (your aid of MNO mostly), so my initial reaction is that you are scum. My initial instinct is usually correct, so I can't necessarily be dissuaded from it by a cleaned up act. If you want evidence of how this works, you can see what alignment MNO was this game, or you can look at my best example of catching bgg1996 in True Blood mafia. Of course, sometimes there are people who can circumvent this process (Sentran and Zag are good examples), so I have to be more wary about "my gut reaction" with them.
Make sense? I know it can sometimes lead to a sort of tunnel-vision, but I promise I am never solely focused on the person in front of me. Last game when I was all over Zag, I investigated Monk that night. Later in that game I began to see Zag as more town, but I wanted to keep appearing suspicious about him so that the scum (Sentran) wouldn't think I had turned my attention to him. For now though, I do still honestly think you are scum. _________________ Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 11:27 pm Post subject: 330 |
|
|
Do you have a different reservation about Garou? What about him suggests he is town? Those views are just currently what I see. Now, I will admit there are a lot of people not putting up reads for me to analyze, so this could just be town v. town with the scum sitting back. I think Amb suggested something of the sort yesterday (though I don't think it was about Garou and myself). _________________ Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Garou_Kinfolk
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 11:42 pm Post subject: 331 |
|
|
| Jedo the Jedi wrote: |
| Garou_Kinfolk wrote: |
| MNOWAX "comes into" the game and follows a scum buddies vote. Since he voted for Jedo in that same post he came in with and didn't change it at all, that leaves only Amb and Sentran as those who were voting for Jedo at that time. With Amb dead and confirmed town, that just leaves Sentran (you) for the only one who MNOWAX could follow. |
Maybe. It's also possible it was just OMGUS. The thinking being that if he could make himself look like a victim he could get me lynched instead. I'm not sure which is more likely from MNO. |
| Jedo the Jedi wrote: |
| I don't think I said anything about your vote for Sentran being OMGUS. Maybe you are combining mine and Sentran's posts. |
Care to try again?
Sentran, my next post will have the interaction data your asking others to get for you. Why am I doing that? Because it's more info for the town.
And now, I hit the character limit. *curses at phone* _________________ Most posts made from my phone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Garou_Kinfolk
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Nov 27, 2012 11:54 pm Post subject: 332 |
|
|
The Amb data I had posted earlier today (day 2).
Zag Data:
Votes made by Zag:
Amb
Esme
D.P.
Votes made against Zag:
Spyrl
U.Monk
D.P.
Amb
Leo
Zags interactions:
Positive interactions by Zag:
G.K. x2
Amb x3
Jedo x5
MNO x1
Negative interactions by Zag:
D.P. x5
U. Monk x1
Jedo x3
Esme x1
Amb x2
MNO x4
3iff x1
Negative actions against Zag by others:
Esme x1
Leo x1
Raekuul x1
U. Monk x3
Spyrl x1
Sentran x1
D.P. x5
Amb x2
Jedo x2
Positive actions to Zag:
Raekuul x1
U.Monk x1
Raearia x1
3iff x1
Spyrl x1
MNOWAX x1
Sentran x1
Jedo x2
I still need to do the interaction chart for me, so the above is NOT complete. _________________ Most posts made from my phone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 1:17 am Post subject: 333 |
|
|
That's referring to MNO's vote for me when he finally showed up, not you. Do you care to try again?
I suppose that information about Zag is supposed to help us think about who might have killed him: mafia, SK, or vig? I'm not really sure how to go about discerning something like that. _________________ Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sentran
Ray of Sucking Funshine
|
Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 1:33 am Post subject: 334 |
|
|
| spyrl wrote: |
| Sentran, you were going at Jedo tooth and nail yesterday believing him scum, yet today it seems that you're just merrily going along with his findings. |
Actually, the fact that Jedo beat me to voting for Garou almost discouraged me from voting Garou at all. I still consider Jedo a strong second for likely scum suspects. Then again, it's awfully hard to get a read on players who have been less vocal. I realize that my willingness to post is making life easier for scum who sit in the shadows and allow the town to lynch each other. _________________ Sentran
"Speaking of double negatives, I haven't read greylab yet today." - Lifeinmomland |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
raekuul
Lives under a bridge & tells stories.
|
Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 1:53 am Post subject: 335 |
|
|
| I'm assuming that both Zag and Amb were town-aligned? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Garou_Kinfolk
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 3:28 am Post subject: 336 |
|
|
| Jedo the Jedi wrote: |
| I suppose that information about Zag is supposed to help us think about who might have killed him: mafia, SK, or vig? I'm not really sure how to go about discerning something like that. |
Sentran asked for the info, I supplied what I had. Like I said, I hadn't done an interaction chart for myself yet.
| raekuul wrote: |
| I'm assuming that both Zag and Amb were town-aligned? |
| Sniklac16 wrote: |
Zag - Keith Williams Tracker Killed night 1
Amb - Pvt Kelly Doctor Killed night 1 |
Doc is town. Tracker I haven't seen as scum, but I guess it isn't impossible.
And that's my last post for the night. _________________ Most posts made from my phone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
3iff
very unbifflike
|
Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 8:23 am Post subject: 337 |
|
|
Sentran: I guessed you were referring to serious votes on MNO but I thought I should include my switch, even if it was RVS, just so that no-one could bring up that incident against me in the future. You know what mafia players can be like...
I would guess that Zag and Amb were offed because they're such strong, clever players. It is disturbing that there's another killer out there but 15 players makes it likely that there would be a vig or sk lurking in the shadows.
I, too, am guessing that the tracker was town but the mod is fairly light on supplying info we should expect to have.
With Jedo, Garou and Sentran providing most of the posts, I can't believe that all of them are mafia (but it wouldn't surprise me if one of them is scum), so I think I shall be choosing another lurker for my vote...I just need to decide who that should be. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Garou_Kinfolk
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 6:35 pm Post subject: 338 |
|
|
I like my Sentran vote, but I am willing to move it to lurkers for the purpose of putting pressure on them. I would ask the mod to prod them, but the last time I did I got called a scum buddy.
Jedo, can you tell me where I "helped" MNOWAX other then the prod? It's a subject you keep bringing up without referencing a post. _________________ Most posts made from my phone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Garou_Kinfolk
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 7:40 pm Post subject: 339 |
|
|
| Sentran wrote: |
| You expected more than a brush off? Why? |
1: You're voting me.
2: I feel that there has to be something you can say other then it's just OMGUS justification, which it isn't.
3: When someone brushes off an accusation with as much evidence as has been posted to support the accusation, it looks scummy.
| Quote: |
| I'm more interested in finding the remaining scum (I'm fairly sure there's more than one) then to spend my time responding to your false reads. I'm also looking for links between you and other players. If I wear blinders to everything except one player, I will have little to go on in following days. |
I finished with my interactions chart, but due to character limit and time constraints here at work, I won't be able to post it until atleast my lunch break.
If there were only one more scum I'd honestly be surprised. My guess, based on game size, is 2 or 3 more.
If my reads are false, then why? More then a brush off is needed to remove my suspicions of you. _________________ Most posts made from my phone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 8:35 pm Post subject: 340 |
|
|
| Garou_Kinfolk wrote: |
I like my Sentran vote, but I am willing to move it to lurkers for the purpose of putting pressure on them. I would ask the mod to prod them, but the last time I did I got called a scum buddy.
Jedo, can you tell me where I "helped" MNOWAX other then the prod? It's a subject you keep bringing up without referencing a post. |
Now this is exactly the sort of post which caused me to suspect you in the first place. That second sentence is an under-handed critique of me, and it attempts to paint me in a negative light and yourself as the victim. It's similar to what you did in post 166--the incriminating post, as if you didn't know which one it is.
| Garou_Kinfolk wrote: |
I'm actually a little surprised at Jedo for his last 2 posts. The differences between the two didn't hit me at first, but reading them a couple of times I had thought that he didn't post two questions to the mod that should have been asked before voting MNOWAX.
Mod: How many players are there on the replacement list?
and
Mod: Can you prod MNOWAX please if you haven't already? Thanks.
I'm going to hold my vote until after we get some kind of response.
Unvote |
Your lead in for this post suggests that I am unfairly targeting MNO, and it gives him a ready-made excuse for when he comes in here. It's like answering a question for another player. "Why weren't you posting?" "Maybe he forgot about the game." This is especially egregious because MNO is one of the most prolific posters who even reads games he isn't in (as previously evidenced by 3iff, I believe).
There is also post 170:
| Quote: |
| @Jedo: I know the game barely got off the ground, but someone may have PMed Sniklac about being a replacement and we wouldn't know it. Hence that question to him. As for MNOWAX posting here, looking at his ISO, the last time he posted was on October 15. The game started on the 24th. Hence why I asked for the prod. Him having posted in other threads is good to know. As for unvoting 3iff, I had initially done it as a joke vote. At this point I feel it is about time to start voting for real, atleast for me. |
"He hasn't posted in here since before the start of the game, so I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt." In the meantime, I am suspicious for not taking your path. No way. _________________ Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Garou_Kinfolk
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 9:25 pm Post subject: 341 |
|
|
Sentran, here is my interaction chart that I said I'd post.
Day 1
Positive interactions by G.K.:
Spyrl (during the rvs phase)
Negative interactions by G.K.:
Leo x1
3iff x3
Raekuul x2
MNOWAX x3
Jedo x7
D.P. x1
Positive interactions by others with G.K.:
Zag x2
Jedo x1
Negative interactions by others with G.K.:
Raekuul x1
3iff x4
D.P. x1
Jedo x8
Votes by G.K.:
Leo
3iff
Jedo
Votes for G.K.:
None
Day 2
Positive interactions by G.K.:
Jedo x1
Sentran x1
3iff x1
Negative interactions by G.K.:
Sentran x4
Jedo x2
Positive interactions by others to G.K.:
3iff x1
Spyrl x1
Negative interactions by others to G.K.:
Sentran x3
Jedo x6
Votes by G.K.:
Sentran
Votes for G.K.:
Jedo
Sentran
Yes, I have a similar chart for all of the players here. I am willing to share them with others, just ask.  _________________ Most posts made from my phone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Garou_Kinfolk
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:09 pm Post subject: 342 |
|
|
I will reply to Jedos post later when I have the time and no character limit to deal with. _________________ Most posts made from my phone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Raearia
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:30 pm Post subject: 343 |
|
|
@ Garou I may have missed it but did you have a post explaining your interaction charts. I.E. what you used to determine what is positive and what is negative interactions?
I am tempted to side with Amb/Jedo's (can't remember who said it specifically but there was a reference in post 330.) possibility of this being a town v town situation, however I feel like it could also easily be two scum pulling of a gambit to deflect attention from one or the other. I too feel that there is at least 2-3 more scum involved based on the games size.
People I am looking at:
Garou
Jedo
Sentran
DP
Esme
So the one thing I want to ask Jedo is did your dream of lynching Amb come true by coincidence or should we be looking at you and your "dream" a little closer? Seeing as how Amb is dead and all. (post 161)
Dp is another player I am looking over through his posts. They have not posted anything of real substance in a while but I feel like DP has been able to skate unnoticed for a few suspicious actions.
| Dragon Phoenix wrote: |
| For now I tend to believe Mnowax, and I have Jedo in the town vibes corner. I would still love to see either Zag or raekuul be the first lynch of the game. |
Mno as we know turned out scum, Zag was NK'd and was town. I have a few more things that make me suspicious of DP but for now I am going to post this and come back later with a few questions/suspicions for those on my list. _________________ 10289 is the end!
Last edited by Raearia on Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:52 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sentran
Ray of Sucking Funshine
|
Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:46 pm Post subject: 344 |
|
|
| Garou_Kinfolk wrote: |
| I like my Sentran vote, but I am willing to move it to lurkers for the purpose of putting pressure on them. |
Unlike Jedo, this is the sentence that holds more information for me. If I were scum, I would try to ally myself with whoever I could, provided it ended up in more town lynches. By offering to switch to a lurker wagon, you are placing the fault of a potential mis-lynch in the hands of the other wagon members. Or, upon a second read, did you mean that you will vote lurkers to encourage posting, but with no intention of lynching them?
As for your interactions map, I am also curious about what you use to determine positive and negative interactions, and what you hope to gain from such. It appears to me to be another method of posting a lot of content with little to no substance. Classic scum maneuver. _________________ Sentran
"Speaking of double negatives, I haven't read greylab yet today." - Lifeinmomland |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:57 pm Post subject: 345 |
|
|
Raearia, I had meant to clarify that while you fit in the lurker categories, your content has been significant. I consider you to be a good, participating member of the town.
I can't really respond to your comment about my dream. That was just straight-up what happened.
Now, I do think Raearia's post relates well with something Sentran (?) said earlier: if you are vocal, you are suspected. Four of the five on her list are the most vocal players in the game. That is a problem which I think is worth changing. We can't let ourselves be swayed like that. I think it could be attributed to a sort of confirmation bias in which we are all looking for scum, but the only place we can really look is the people who are posting. Therefore, that is where scum will be "found."
I'll take a step back and unvote. I do not normally like looking at lurkers, but there are like five of us playing right now. That's less than half. To be certain, Garou is my pick for the lynch today, and I intend to come back to him once we've roused the lurkers. I don't see him easily moving from my top scum read. _________________ Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Raearia
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 1:27 am Post subject: 346 |
|
|
@Jedo I have a post I am working on and a point I was going to make in it was that unfortunately the only people I can look at are those posting. Those who are not posting I can't look at because if they just vote without giving anything considerable to the conversation its hard to get a read on them, the same goes for raekuuls one liner posts so far. It is really hard to get a read on him when he asks simple singular things and nothing else.
Anyways just wanted to throw out there that I have a wall of text coming and I agree with what you said Jedo, The people on my list are really the only people I have anything to judge. _________________ 10289 is the end! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 1:55 am Post subject: 347 |
|
|
I'm sorry if you thought that was a critique of you. That was pointed at all of us. I currently suspect Garou, and I think the stuff against Sentran had some good points. As you said though, there is nothing to analyze of the people sitting in the shadows, and scum can easily hide there. This is the worst case of lurking I have ever seen in a game.
I'll go ahead with vote esme. _________________ Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
3iff
very unbifflike
|
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 8:20 am Post subject: 348 |
|
|
Jedo: I have to agree with you when you say there are 5 of us playing and the rest are watching the game at best (or maybe they've forgotten that they are playing...a la MNO).
Of the absent players, I too thought of esme for my vote. Leo, DP are other candidates while UM may have real life problems? Currently I'm happy to vote for any of these.
I'm not forgetting about Raekuul, spyrl or jadesmar.
So, Vote: esme
It's mainly a lurker vote. Start playing or die. The same applies to the others who are not posting. The danger is that if the vocal 5 are all town then they're likely to hound each other to lynches. I would be surprised if we were all town but I have no strong feelings as yet on the scumminess of any of the vocal ones.
Garou: Any conclusions from your data trawl? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dragon Phoenix
Judge Doom
|
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:23 am Post subject: 349 |
|
|
Apologies for my absence, couple of real life issues. Will look into the game latest tomorrow. _________________ My photography:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/artrock2006/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
raekuul
Lives under a bridge & tells stories.
|
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 11:58 am Post subject: 350 |
|
|
| Jedo and 3iff: Why esme in particular? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 12:37 pm Post subject: 351 |
|
|
raekuul, I'm not answering any of your questions until you post content, such as your own views on the matter of yesterday's events and the arguments made today. If you noticed something else of note, please share that. _________________ Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
3iff
very unbifflike
|
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 12:44 pm Post subject: 352 |
|
|
No particular reason, but just 6 posts, the last on the 13th Nov and virtually no content whatsoever in any of those 6 posts.
If she (or he?) is playing then posting will help us.
Funny how an implied threat to lurkers brings some quick responses...if esme is town then saying nothing at all will not help the town. The same applies to many others. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
spyrl
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 4:30 pm Post subject: 353 |
|
|
| Sentran wrote: |
| Actually, the fact that Jedo beat me to voting for Garou almost discouraged me from voting Garou at all. I still consider Jedo a strong second for likely scum suspects. |
And yet you didn't consider how scummy it looks to not voice that at all?
When you go from Day 1: "Jedo is SCUM! Jedo is SCUM! Jedo is SCUM!" to Day 2: "Hmmm, Jedo makes a great point, I'm voting where he's voting." without acknowledging the fact that you're going against your own previous vocalizations, it's highly suspicious. I know Jedo has immunity today, but that doesn't mean that because they have immunity you would completely forget all of your previous suspicions.
On an other note, I have also felt that we have half of the players actually playing. It's good odds that (numerically speaking) we have at least one scum among them. I've got my eye on Leonidas at the moment. He's come into the game, basically waved at everyone and ducked his head back down. We need active speakers or no one can tell if they're scum or not (at least until they are dead). I would love to see at least one post of opinions from people, at least that way we know where everyone stands.
| 3iff wrote: |
| I'm not forgetting about Raekuul, spyrl or jadesmar |
What on earth did you mean by this? _________________ "And all those exclamation marks, you notice? Five? A sure sign of someone who wears his underpants on his head." Terry Pratchett, Maskerade
Discworld Mafia is here! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
3iff
very unbifflike
|
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 4:38 pm Post subject: 354 |
|
|
| Actually spyrl, you're a reasonably regular poster...I wasn't really allowing for the week-long night that we've just had. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
spyrl
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 5:35 pm Post subject: 355 |
|
|
I'm still confused by the whole "forgetting" part. What did you mean by that? What aren't you forgetting? _________________ "And all those exclamation marks, you notice? Five? A sure sign of someone who wears his underpants on his head." Terry Pratchett, Maskerade
Discworld Mafia is here! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Garou_Kinfolk
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 8:07 pm Post subject: 356 |
|
|
| Raearia wrote: |
| @ Garou I may have missed it but did you have a post explaining your interaction charts. I.E. what you used to determine what is positive and what is negative interactions? |
| Sentran wrote: |
| As for your interactions map, I am also curious about what you use to determine positive and negative interactions, and what you hope to gain from such. |
I don't think I can explain effectively, so I'll use a recent post as an example. I chose this one because it had a mix of interactions.
| Jedo the Jedi wrote: |
| Raearia, I had meant to clarify that while you fit in the lurker categories, your content has been significant. I consider you to be a good, participating member of the town. |
This I would classify a possitive interaction from Jedo to Raearia. Jedo is complimenting Raearia on her post content.
| Quote: |
| I can't really respond to your comment about my dream. That was just straight-up what happened. |
This would be more of a neutral interaction. It doesn't call her out for bringing up something that could be seen as trivial or small. It's more of a statement of a fact then anything else.
| Quote: |
| Now, I do think Raearia's post relates well with something Sentran (?) said earlier: if you are vocal, you are suspected. Four of the five on her list are the most vocal players in the game. That is a problem which I think is worth changing. We can't let ourselves be swayed like that. I think it could be attributed to a sort of confirmation bias in which we are all looking for scum, but the only place we can really look is the people who are posting. Therefore, that is where scum will be "found." |
This would be a possitive for both Sentran and Raearia as Jedo is agreeing with them.
| Quote: |
| I'll take a step back and unvote. I do not normally like looking at lurkers, but there are like five of us playing right now. That's less than half. To be certain, Garou is my pick for the lynch today, and I intend to come back to him once we've roused the lurkers. I don't see him easily moving from my top scum read. |
This is both positive and negative towards me. First positive because Jedo unvotes. It because negative as he still wants to lynch me after the lurker population has posted.
When I classify something as positive or negative, it doesn't matter if it's a small thing or a large one.
I hope that helped.  _________________ Most posts made from my phone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sentran
Ray of Sucking Funshine
|
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 8:25 pm Post subject: 357 |
|
|
spyrl: Why would I not mention that I'm not happy that I am voting the same as Jedo? While I do my best to help the town with my observations and inclinations, I also realize that if I give too much information, and I'm onto the scum, I'll likely be killed early in the game. As for Jedo, I still suspect him strongly. I also find it suspect that he guessed the theme so quickly after day began, almost as if he had a few extra clues (i.e. roles) from which to draw information. That's all a moot point, since he has immunity.
Garou: Are you saying that if I remember to complement people on their play on every post, I won't appear scummy to you? Words fail me when trying to explain why I have a problem with this logic. _________________ Sentran
"Speaking of double negatives, I haven't read greylab yet today." - Lifeinmomland |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Garou_Kinfolk
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 8:43 pm Post subject: 358 |
|
|
| Jedo the Jedi wrote: |
| Garou_Kinfolk wrote: |
I like my Sentran vote, but I am willing to move it to lurkers for the purpose of putting pressure on them. I would ask the mod to prod them, but the last time I did I got called a scum buddy.
Jedo, can you tell me where I "helped" MNOWAX other then the prod? It's a subject you keep bringing up without referencing a post. |
Now this is exactly the sort of post which caused me to suspect you in the first place. That second sentence is an under-handed critique of me, and it attempts to paint me in a negative light and yourself as the victim. |
I was actually just stating a fact, not trying to critique you in some way. If I had I would have named you specifically in the post. That fact that you felt it needed responding to in such a way tells me you feel insecure about it. IF you were scum I'd think that you broght up the prod of MNOWAX as an out for him in hopes that some of your scum buddies would also jump on it. Actually 3iff did say something about it in post 240.
| 3iff wrote: |
Garou:
Posts163&166
Wanting to know about replacements. Why? That's something for the Mod to worry about.
Then he criticises Jedo for not asking the same question about replacements. Odd.
Asking for MNO to be prodded is fine, but a PM to the mod would have been just as effective...unless you WANT to show that you are wanting MNO to be prodded. |
I had answered him in post 249 and he didn't bring it up again.
| Jedo wrote: |
It's similar to what you did in post 166--the incriminating post, as if you didn't know which one it is.
| Garou_Kinfolk wrote: |
I'm actually a little surprised at Jedo for his last 2 posts. The differences between the two didn't hit me at first, but reading them a couple of times I had thought that he didn't post two questions to the mod that should have been asked before voting MNOWAX.
Mod: How many players are there on the replacement list?
and
Mod: Can you prod MNOWAX please if you haven't already? Thanks.
I'm going to hold my vote until after we get some kind of response.
Unvote |
Your lead in for this post suggests that I am unfairly targeting MNO, and it gives him a ready-made excuse for when he comes in here. It's like answering a question for another player. "Why weren't you posting?" "Maybe he forgot about the game." This is especially egregious because MNO is one of the most prolific posters who even reads games he isn't in (as previously evidenced by 3iff, I believe). |
I was simply surprised that you hadn't done it. You are a MUCH more experienced player then I am and I would have thought that it would be one of the first things you do to lurkers. As for giving him an excuse, I believe that 3iff did a better job of that in his post 162.
| 3iff wrote: |
Amb tends to lynch himself...
It's still unnervingly quiet here...Does MNO know he's in this game? |
The bolding is mine for emphasis.
| Quote: |
There is also post 170:
| Quote: |
| @Jedo: I know the game barely got off the ground, but someone may have PMed Sniklac about being a replacement and we wouldn't know it. Hence that question to him. As for MNOWAX posting here, looking at his ISO, the last time he posted was on October 15. The game started on the 24th. Hence why I asked for the prod. Him having posted in other threads is good to know. As for unvoting 3iff, I had initially done it as a joke vote. At this point I feel it is about time to start voting for real, atleast for me. |
"He hasn't posted in here since before the start of the game, so I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt." In the meantime, I am suspicious for not taking your path. No way. |
Actually, at this point you're suspicous for several other things. In post 170 I never said you were suspicous. I was simply explaining why I had posted the way I did and responding to you. I had felt, and still do, that what I did was a common practice and nothing more.
At this point you have dropped down off of my town list, and dragged 3iff down lower on it as well through your responces. I had gone through is ISO and he did have several posts that I would classify as possitive towards you. I am going to go back through the data I have as well as ISOs to see if there are further links between either of you, MNOWAX, and anyone else. _________________ Most posts made from my phone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Garou_Kinfolk
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 8:46 pm Post subject: 359 |
|
|
| Sentran wrote: |
| Garou: Are you saying that if I remember to complement people on their play on every post, I won't appear scummy to you? Words fail me when trying to explain why I have a problem with this logic. |
Did I say that having possitive interactions makes someone town? Doesn't look like it. If someone has alot of them with someone else, then they become linked in my mind, such as Jedo and 3iff as I had mentioned at the end of my last post. I don't see where you're getting the logic you describe in your last post. _________________ Most posts made from my phone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sentran
Ray of Sucking Funshine
|
Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:39 pm Post subject: 360 |
|
|
| Garou_Kinfolk wrote: |
| Did I say that having possitive interactions makes someone town? Doesn't look like it. |
Now this is a good, useful post. Unfortunately, that means it's useful to the scum as well, since they can use this info to manipulate the game. Now that I better understand your reason for the chart, I can appreciate the logic. That being said, I am trying to determine if the post makes you appear more or less townish.
I still really want the less prolific players to post more. I'm not yet willing to use my vote to push lurkers, but I can certainly understand it. _________________ Sentran
"Speaking of double negatives, I haven't read greylab yet today." - Lifeinmomland |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|