|
|
|
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Dragon Phoenix
Judge Doom
|
Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 9:52 am Post subject: 401 |
|
|
| Raearia wrote: |
So I was making a wall of text and it didn't save. I am a little irritated about it. But I do wanna say DP you are being a bit aggressive and high handed thinking people are not reading your posts. You really had nothing of importance in your posts to warrant the kind of aggressive attitude you are displaying.
Your lack of content is not the fault of the reader. You stated you were voting for Esme for being a lurker and no one wanted or agreed to join your bandwagon, simple fact. Why are you being overly defensive and aggressive that your logic isn't being viewed as valid?
Your logic that if no one jumps on your bandwagon choice then your target is scum is pretty faulty. |
1. I voted esme with an explanation why. If people then say that I do things for a reason that is simply not true, and not in line with what I posted, I will correct that. If you deem that aggressive, not my problem.
2. I did not state that esme is scum, I said that the likelihood that she is scum increases because the wagon did not take off.
I am still happy with my vote, at least until esme shows up and makes some contribution. At best she is scum (odds higher than a random pick), at worst she is town but not helping. Those are pretty reasonable odds on day two. Far better odds than players who do post their thoughts going at each other's throats. _________________ My photography:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/artrock2006/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
raekuul
Lives under a bridge & tells stories.
|
Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 5:06 pm Post subject: 402 |
|
|
| Dragon Phoenix wrote: |
| 2. I did not state that esme is scum, I said that the likelihood that she is scum increases because the wagon did not take off. |
How's that work, exactly? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dragon Phoenix
Judge Doom
|
Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 7:06 pm Post subject: 403 |
|
|
Like I said before, because it was a valid (lurker) target for day one. Scum typically look for valid bandwagons to join on the first day or two, because they make sense and their vote will not be questioned as much. _________________ My photography:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/artrock2006/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sniklac16
Spaciest of aides
|
Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 7:19 pm Post subject: 404 |
|
|
| dragon Phoenix wrote: |
| Mod, we have oodles of lurkers/drop-outs. Could you prod them a bit? Thanks. |
Who do you believe to be lurking/dropped out? _________________ What lies behind us and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dragon Phoenix
Judge Doom
|
Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 7:36 pm Post subject: 405 |
|
|
esme - latest post 13 November
leonidas - latest post with content 9 November (posted an I'm here yesterday)
undercover monk - latest post 16 November (real life issues) _________________ My photography:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/artrock2006/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Leonidas
Membre Daedalien
|
Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 7:56 pm Post subject: 406 |
|
|
Re-read the thread and found this in the discussion between Jedo and Garou_Kinfolk regarding MNOWAX:
| Jedo the Jedi wrote: |
| Garou, [...]Second, I feel like you are just giving MNO an out for when he does show back up. |
Why not. Just because it's someone else's gut feeling doesn't mean it's automatically wrong. Seems more promising to me than just random-voting or guessing today without taking into account day 1's data and outcome
vote: Garou_Kinfolk |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sniklac16
Spaciest of aides
|
Posted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 8:15 pm Post subject: 407 |
|
|
Prods were sent to just esme and Undercover Monk since Leonidas has posted. If I don't get a response within the next 3 days I will get a replacement. _________________ What lies behind us and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
spyrl
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 12:04 am Post subject: 408 |
|
|
| Raearia wrote: |
| So in the end how does debating the probability that someone was scum actually help us in determining who is scum? |
At this point, with only MNO as a confirmed scum, we've still got a lot of question marks out there, but by looking at analysis (like Garou posted) we can see who's doing what, and where. Later, the probability factors become more significant than they are now, when we are all looking around in the dark for gleanings. =^_^=
Still happy with my vote. And trusting someone else's gut vote is only useful if that person actually votes using their gut. I've never seen Jedo ever, ever vote for someone based on his gut, so I'm finding it extremely hard to find any credence in his voting right now. _________________ "And all those exclamation marks, you notice? Five? A sure sign of someone who wears his underpants on his head." Terry Pratchett, Maskerade
Discworld Mafia is here! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Garou_Kinfolk
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 3:39 am Post subject: 409 |
|
|
| Leonidas wrote: |
Re-read the thread and found this in the discussion between Jedo and Garou_Kinfolk regarding MNOWAX:
| Jedo the Jedi wrote: |
| Garou, [...]Second, I feel like you are just giving MNO an out for when he does show back up. |
Why not. Just because it's someone else's gut feeling doesn't mean it's automatically wrong. Seems more promising to me than just random-voting or guessing today without taking into account day 1's data and outcome
vote: Garou_Kinfolk |
Here I thought this horse was about dead, but I guess not.
@Leo: I don't know how far you've read, but here's a timeline and a few quotes for you to re-read on the subject of my MNO prod.
I asked for the prod in post 166.
The quote you have above is post 168.
I replied to Jedo in post 170.
| Garou_Kinfolk wrote: |
| @Jedo:...As for MNOWAX posting here, looking at his ISO, the last time he posted was on October 15. The game started on the 24th. Hence why I asked for the prod. |
Jedo seemed to have dropped it at that point.
3iff then brought it back up in post 240.
I wasn't able to reply right away, but I did in post 249.
That is when 3iff decided to drop it.
Day 2 comes and Jedo votes for me in post 310 referencing the prod as "helping MNO".
| Jedo the Jedi wrote: |
| Personally, I'm going to vote: Garou_Kinfolk. Now that MNO is confirmed scum, I do believe I was right in thinking that Garou was trying to help out his buddy. |
I once again responded to the prod issue in post 320.
| Garou_Kinfolk wrote: |
| @Jedo:With MNOWAX being absent, I did what I, and others, had done in previous games. I asked for the Mod to prod him. This is the first time I've seen anyone get flak for it. With you it was a misunderstanding. With MNOWAX it looked like an absent player. |
In 338 I asked Jedo where I "helped" MNO.
Jedo relied in post 340, bringing up the prod again.
I replied in post 358.
Jedo had not replied since, so I figured he was unable to rebut it, but it may also be that he has had real life issues.
Now, about gut votes and Jedo. I have done a search through his meta (yes, I know. It's meta) and I couldn't find one reference to him EVER making a gut vote. So, to be thorough, I also searched for feel and instinct. I found 1 reference in the Secret Theme game that Zag ran.
| Jedo the Jedi, Secret Theme by Zag wrote: |
| While Amb may feel a Mom lynch isn't possible today, she is where I feel most comfortable with my vote. Nobody else really comes that close to her level of scumminess. (Sentran has moved down a bit.) I'm willing to push for this. unvote, vote Lifeinmomland |
lifeinmomland was town in that game.
With my search, and everything that came of it, I feel that Jedo's "gut" feel is invalid. _________________ Most posts made from my phone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Garou_Kinfolk
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 2:55 pm Post subject: 410 |
|
|
I had forgot to mention one important thing about Jedo's feeling about liml in the last Secret Theme Game. Jedo was the Godfather. _________________ Most posts made from my phone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos
|
Posted: Mon Dec 03, 2012 11:18 pm Post subject: 411 |
|
|
well I was about to request that I be replaced but if esme has to be replaced you guys will just have to deal with my lurkieness this game sorry. If someone would be kind enough summarise the major arguments of the day so I dont have to go in-depth re-read of page 11 I will try to post more often. _________________ The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Garou_Kinfolk
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 2:46 am Post subject: 412 |
|
|
@Monk: Here's a semi-"Readers Digest" version.
PAGE 8
Sniklac declares day.
18 minutes later Jedo guesses the theme and gains immunity.
Jedo posts various bits of information, then votes for me for "helping" MNO.
Jadesmar replaces T.G.C.
I answer Jedos accusations a few posts later.
Sentran votes for me because I voted for Jedo after MNO did.
I post that what I believe is evidence that Sentran is scum and I vote him.
PAGE 9
Jedo and I begin going back and forth about my asking the mod to prod MNO.
Sentran ignores my evidence against him and asks for anyone to bring evidence against me if they can.
Lots of people are lurking.
I post the interaction data I have on Zag.
I call Sentran on his brush off of my accusations against him, he still brushes it off.
I ask Jedo how I "helped MNO" and he responds.
I post the interaction data I have on myself that Sentran asks for.
Raearia and Sentran ask about my interaction charts.
People start to discuss putting pressure on lurkers to get them to participate.
Jedo and 3iff both vote Esme.
Raekuul asks Jedo and 3iff why Esme in particular.
Jedo refuses to answer. 3iff replies that there's no particular reason.
I post an example of how I make my interaction charts using a recent post.
I respond to Jedo about his post on how I "helped" MNO. I also show pieces of 3iff and Jedo ties.
Sentran questions my interaction charts using incorrect logic.
I respond to Sentran and correct his logic.
PAGE 10
D.P. votes for Esme.
Raekuul responds to Jedo not responding to his question about voting Esme.
Sentran unvotes me, but still wants me lynched.
Spyrl votes Leo.
Sentran and D.P. begin to discuss D.P.s choice of voting Esme.
Spyrl calls D.P.s logic on voting Esme flawed.
Jadesmar asks where a scum might have been on the MNO lunch.
Raekuul joins that conversation with Jadesmar and Spyrl.
D.P. gives up on Sentran and asks for the mod to prod the lurkers.
Leo does an "I'm here" post.
Raearia joins in and calls D.P.s logic against Esme flawed.
PAGE 11
D.P. explains his votes (day 1 and 2) on Esme.
Raekuul questions part of this new explanation.
Leo votes me based on the prod I asked for on MNO during day 1. References a post of Jedos from just after the prod request.
My post 409 has every notable reference to the MNO prod so that everyone can look at it. At the end I show why I call Jedo's "gut vote" for me invalid. _________________ Most posts made from my phone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Garou_Kinfolk
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 5:33 am Post subject: 413 |
|
|
I think that is most everything. If someone has a different perspective or I missed something, I'm sure I'll hear about it. _________________ Most posts made from my phone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jadesmar
Bad Puppy
|
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 6:33 am Post subject: 414 |
|
|
| Garou_Kinfolk wrote: |
PAGE 9
Sentran ignores my evidence against him and asks for anyone to bring evidence against me if they can.
|
Interesting
Vote: Sentran |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
3iff
very unbifflike
|
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 8:21 am Post subject: 415 |
|
|
Long weekends are tough when I have to pick up three days worth of mafia chat.
Garou: One thing worth mentioning as you keep referring to it. I picked up on your public request to the mod about prodding the lurkers (some time ago) as worthy to raise at that time, to see what sort of 'reason' you might give for doing it that way. Although you seemed a bit defensive, I don't really see anything more in the incident. I didn't see it as a defence of MNO.
Glad to see some of the quieter players popping into the forum. More very soon. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
esme
^^^^-- is female! Get the pronouns right
|
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 1:17 pm Post subject: 416 |
|
|
Given the fact that you have counted my few posts, one would think that you would have had the time to actually read them.
This would tell you both that I was the first to accuse scum MNOWAX after his blunder and that I started to lurk because I waited for a vote-count. I don't appreciate that our mod has time to prod me, but no time for reasonably frequent vote-counts.
Now, I won't comment on the game further until I have had time to make my own digest for myself. _________________ Mundus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 1:21 pm Post subject: 417 |
|
|
I was being intentionally silent to let the lurkers and less vocal players have some say, but I was also doing some end-of-semester work this weekend. I will have a post up later tonight. _________________ Paragon Tally: 18 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
3iff
very unbifflike
|
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:19 pm Post subject: 418 |
|
|
| esme wrote: |
| This would tell you both that I was the first to accuse scum MNOWAX after his blunder and that I started to lurk because I waited for a vote-count. I don't appreciate that our mod has time to prod me, but no time for reasonably frequent vote-counts. |
Yes, esme, great catch, apart from the fact that many players had twigged MNO before you chimed in.
P83, 3iff, first vote on MNO as he was too quiet (semi-random vote)
p134, 3iff, first REAL vote on MNO
p162, "Does MNO know he's in this game?"
p174, Jedo, finds three strikes against MNO
p239+240, 3iff, more criticism of MNO and his excuses for not posting
(plus many posts from others that I haven't bothered to include)
p241+243, esme, "THE? town roleblocker" and an accusation that I'm defending MNO.
So, you FINALLY get involved in the MNO discussion and in p416 you claim credit for being the FIRST to accuse MNO?
Really! You've said absolutely nothing in any of your seven posts.
I have my vote in the right place. Confirm vote: esme |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:44 pm Post subject: 419 |
|
|
Just a brief post before I go back.
| esme wrote: |
| This would tell you both that I was the first to accuse scum MNOWAX after his blunder and that I started to lurk because I waited for a vote-count. |
You are kidding me, right? The only "accusation" you had of MNO was asking him to elaborate on his use of the word "the." That's it. You didn't even vote for him, and before you get into some spiel about wanting a vote count before casting a vote, you made no mention of that before.
I have 3iff to thank for sending me in that direction. I think we have indeed stumbled upon a lucky catch. _________________ Paragon Tally: 18 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 4:22 pm Post subject: 420 |
|
|
| raekuul wrote: |
| Jedo and 3iff: Why esme in particular? |
It was somewhat random for me. That was the first name on my overlap lurker list in 310.
| Garou_Kinfolk wrote: |
| Jedo the Jedi wrote: |
| Garou_Kinfolk wrote: |
I like my Sentran vote, but I am willing to move it to lurkers for the purpose of putting pressure on them. I would ask the mod to prod them, but the last time I did I got called a scum buddy.
Jedo, can you tell me where I "helped" MNOWAX other then the prod? It's a subject you keep bringing up without referencing a post. |
Now this is exactly the sort of post which caused me to suspect you in the first place. That second sentence is an under-handed critique of me, and it attempts to paint me in a negative light and yourself as the victim. |
I was actually just stating a fact, not trying to critique you in some way. If I had I would have named you specifically in the post. That fact that you felt it needed responding to in such a way tells me you feel insecure about it. IF you were scum I'd think that you broght up the prod of MNOWAX as an out for him in hopes that some of your scum buddies would also jump on it. Actually 3iff did say something about it in post 240. |
"Just stating a fact"? No, sir. Saying "I would do X but I got in trouble for it last time so I won't" is a critique. You didn't need to name me specifically because everybody knows I am the one who criticized you for that. If you think you are fooling anybody with this rhetoric, I'll be damned.
I don't understand that "IF" statement at the end. I think 3iff's suggestion that it could have been to appear that you want MNO to be prodded is plausible. Your response in 249 doesn't change that.
| raekuul wrote: |
| I will say this right now - I am opposed to lurker lynching at this point in time for the simple fact that I have been lurking. |
I personally never said anything about lurker lynching. The idea was to push people to the limit until they come in to participate, though it could possibly have ended in a lynch. My preferred was to get them posting then go back to Garou (unless his new content during that time changed my mind).
I don't understand Sentran's post 376. I do think the logic DP presents in defense of his reasoning against esme is not the greatest basis (as Sentran and spyrl's responses demonstrate), but the way esme has responded lends credence to it.
| spyrl wrote: |
| I've never seen Jedo ever, ever vote for someone based on his gut, so I'm finding it extremely hard to find any credence in his voting right now. |
| Jedo the Jedi in post 329 wrote: |
| Therefore, "my gut" read against you is that I think I see some of the steps (your aid of MNO mostly), so my initial reaction is that you are scum. My initial instinct is usually correct, so I can't necessarily be dissuaded from it by a cleaned up act. If you want evidence of how this works, you can see what alignment MNO was this game, or you can look at my best example of catching bgg1996 in True Blood mafia. |
To articulate it differently: My "gut read" is seeing a tiny thing which I think is indicative of scum though there is little other evidence to support it. Another example is catching Amb in Sopranos' Mafia. There just was something which I knew meant he was scum. So it happens, and I think it also has here.
That's also a response to you, Garou. These instances may not have been labeled as "gut reads," but they are the same. Maybe the problem is difference in definitions of "gut read," in which case you should evaluate my words based on what I understand it to be.
| Garou_Kinfolk wrote: |
| Quote: |
There is also post 170:
| Quote: |
| @Jedo: I know the game barely got off the ground, but someone may have PMed Sniklac about being a replacement and we wouldn't know it. Hence that question to him. As for MNOWAX posting here, looking at his ISO, the last time he posted was on October 15. The game started on the 24th. Hence why I asked for the prod. Him having posted in other threads is good to know. As for unvoting 3iff, I had initially done it as a joke vote. At this point I feel it is about time to start voting for real, atleast for me. |
"He hasn't posted in here since before the start of the game, so I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt." In the meantime, I am suspicious for not taking your path. No way. |
Actually, at this point you're suspicous for several other things. In post 170 I never said you were suspicous. I was simply explaining why I had posted the way I did and responding to you. I had felt, and still do, that what I did was a common practice and nothing more. |
I didn't say you said I was suspicious in 170. My bad for putting those so close together. I was commenting that I am suddenly suspicious to you in the present time for not following your path and for bringing this up again. Anyway, my mind still hasn't been changed regarding those circumstances. _________________ Paragon Tally: 18 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sentran
Ray of Sucking Funshine
|
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 6:50 pm Post subject: 421 |
|
|
| Garou_Kinfolk wrote: |
| Sentran ignores my evidence against him and asks for anyone to bring evidence against me if they can. |
Well, GK, I personally thought your post was the most self-serving piece of tripe I've seen posted in a Mafia game. I read it yesterday, then decided to sleep on it to see if it looked any better after some consideration. It doesn't. UM asked for a recap of the thread, not... whatever you think this is.
There are a few points you touch on, that don't involve you, in which you appear non-judgmental. Everything that affects you, however, reads as "this is why this person is scum, this is why I'm right, everybody should listen to me." If UM reads beyond your post, as I sincerely hope he does, he will see that the comment above is in response to me asking if anyone saw anything particularly scummy/townish about Amb and Zag. I agree that I blew off his post (on page 8), because I didn't think it held merit or helped. I still feel the same about that. I'm now considering that jadesmar may be either A: linked to GK, B: foolish town that is easily led, or C: (if GK is in fact town) trying to link himself to a townie to appear less scummy. _________________ Sentran
"Speaking of double negatives, I haven't read greylab yet today." - Lifeinmomland |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Garou_Kinfolk
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 7:49 pm Post subject: 422 |
|
|
To properly respond to various posts, I will need to use a computer. Until then don't expect much from me.
One last thing. If anyone would like to also do a post summarizing what's happened for Monk so there are more then one perspective. I would also like to see what others have perceived so far. _________________ Most posts made from my phone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jadesmar
Bad Puppy
|
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 8:49 pm Post subject: 423 |
|
|
| Sentran wrote: |
| I'm now considering that jadesmar may be either A: linked to GK, B: foolish town that is easily led, or C: (if GK is in fact town) trying to link himself to a townie to appear less scummy. |
If a list was made of the most foolish townies ever, I'd be at the top. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Raearia
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 9:15 pm Post subject: 424 |
|
|
Esme I get that you don't appreciate that the mod isn't running HIS game the way YOU feel is appropriate however I don't appreciate trying to play a mafia game where people feel its ok to lurk through and not participate.
As was already stated you were not in fact the first to go after MNO. Even after vote counts were posted you failed to participate in the actual conversations.
Here are all of your posts:
Post 7
| esme wrote: |
| Confirm and waiting for game to start. |
Post 40
| esme wrote: |
| vote: Leonidas |
VOTE COUNT POST 64
Post 113
| esme wrote: |
Hmm, in the good old times, when I was active here, the first day went more like "first bandwagon, claim, disband bandwagon, second bandwagon, claim, lynch".
I am suspicious of the "we won't claim on the first day whatever happens" tactics. That is a tactic that only benefits the players concerned in the games that they are scum, but not the town. (Just as always claiming would.) The fact that there are no clear behavioural rules is the only thing that leaves wiggle room for errors of the scum.
I will reconsider my vote, but I would really like a vote-count first. Wasn't there a script in the good old times that did vote-counts? |
Post 125
| esme wrote: |
| Zag wrote: |
| Well, esme has replied, and lurking was my only reason for voting. |
| Sentran wrote: |
| I actually agree with this, as it was my primary purpose for voting him as well. Unvote: esme |
I appreciate the unvote, but the preceding sentence is a no-brainer first day vote for me.
Vote:Sentran It just makes sense to vote for her. |
VOTE COUNT POST 153
Post 241
| esme wrote: |
| MNOWAX wrote: |
| Since someone did vote for me I'm claiming. I'm the Town Roleblocker. |
"The" ? Can you elaborate? |
| Sniklac16 wrote: |
| I apologize, I'll try to do more votes counts. However if I do one vote count on one page and there was only a change or 2 on the next, I don't find it necessary to do another one. |
| esme wrote: |
A vote count at the beginning of each page is the bare minimum, I think that it is usually too little, it should be one per page, but also one per x vote changes and one per x days. Actually, you should *especially* make a vote count when there are no changes. It is practically zero work for you and it saves everyone scanning a page first for the non-existent vote count and then for the non-existent vote changes.
This is the number 1 measure to make the game progress faster. I would understand if you don't want to give a vote count because it is a hassle for you, but saying that you do not give a new vote count because it is too little work is not understandable to me. |
Post 243
| esme wrote: |
| 3iff wrote: |
Re MNO.
I think it would be reasonable to think there would at most be just one town roleblocker. So calling himself "the" town roleblocker would be ok. Whether he really IS the town roleblocker is a completely different question. |
And why do you defend MNO instead of waiting for his own answer? |
VOTE COUNT POST 262
VOTE COUNT POST 377
Post 416
| esme wrote: |
Given the fact that you have counted my few posts, one would think that you would have had the time to actually read them.
This would tell you both that I was the first to accuse scum MNOWAX after his blunder and that I started to lurk because I waited for a vote-count. I don't appreciate that our mod has time to prod me, but no time for reasonably frequent vote-counts.
Now, I won't comment on the game further until I have had time to make my own digest for myself. |
Yes you said you prefer more frequent vote counts. However you also never mentioned that if you did not get your way you would lurk and not participate, which is in essence what I feel you just said. I am just a bit annoyed with what I feel is a punishment to the rest of us playing that by you not participating you are expressing to the mod how unhappy you are with how he is running it. By punishment I mean not participating. _________________ 10289 is the end! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
spyrl
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 9:38 pm Post subject: 425 |
|
|
| Jedo the Jedi wrote: |
| Jedo the Jedi in post 329 wrote: |
| Therefore, "my gut" read against you is that I think I see some of the steps (your aid of MNO mostly), so my initial reaction is that you are scum. My initial instinct is usually correct, so I can't necessarily be dissuaded from it by a cleaned up act. If you want evidence of how this works, you can see what alignment MNO was this game, or you can look at my best example of catching bgg1996 in True Blood mafia. |
To articulate it differently: My "gut read" is seeing a tiny thing which I think is indicative of scum though there is little other evidence to support it. Another example is catching Amb in Sopranos' Mafia. There just was something which I knew meant he was scum. So it happens, and I think it also has here. |
See, using a quote from this game in support of your "I'm a gut read guy" still doesn't fly with me. You've always been the cold, hard logical facts guy. The one who finds something clear and specific that others can get behind, and using that to show your logic. Not something teeny, tiny that has little supporting evidence, which even you stated in post 310 that you had reservations about because it seemed too blatant. And that's another erroneous thing. You mentioned that "your best example" is "catching bgg in the True Blood game" when that's not true. I was in that game and I started the whole bgg thing with the infamous "we" debacle, and lots of others piled on, so if that's your "best example," it's not that great. Also, catching Amb at scum is like cathing MNO, they both look scummy even when they're town, so it's rather like flipping a coin. Half the games I've seen them play as town, I'd have bet money that they were scum. _________________ "And all those exclamation marks, you notice? Five? A sure sign of someone who wears his underpants on his head." Terry Pratchett, Maskerade
Discworld Mafia is here! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2012 11:06 pm Post subject: 426 |
|
|
Maybe you should go read True Blood again. My second post of the game is me starting in on bgg, and it's at least four days before you start on bgg. Hell, it's two days before your second post of the game. A quick ISO shows that.
As for Sopranos' Mafia, I had a read on Amb when (almost) nobody else suspected him, and again it started as this tiny suspicion. Normally what happens with these reads is that something sparks it, then when I press the assault, more things come up. Anyway, if you want to check this game you can start at post 384.
Conclusion: I think cold, hard logical facts are better, but my gut has been more accurate. The facts are more likely to sway other town members, and there are generally more of them to support the case. As I described my gut reads above, they are an intuition (a sixth sense, if you will) which are good, but they don't come along all the time. I think that's what I had with MNO, and I think that's likely with Garou. I'm not sure I can say much more about this. _________________ Paragon Tally: 18 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
spyrl
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 1:17 am Post subject: 427 |
|
|
| Jedo the Jedi wrote: |
| Maybe you should go read True Blood again. My second post of the game is me starting in on bgg, and it's at least four days before you start on bgg. |
Ah, yes, because the second post of a game on the second page, when we were still in RVS (or barely out of it) is clearly the penultimate indication of catching someone at something. By that same standard, we should take your post 49 (on page 2)
| Jedo the Jedi wrote: |
| I'M SCUM I'M SCUM I'M SCUM!! |
as truth. _________________ "And all those exclamation marks, you notice? Five? A sure sign of someone who wears his underpants on his head." Terry Pratchett, Maskerade
Discworld Mafia is here! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 1:25 am Post subject: 428 |
|
|
Now you're just trying too hard, spyrl. Regardless of your coloring of the situation, bgg was scum, I was town, and I had no other information than the posts of the game. It's a catch, and even more, it is a catch which was obviously more based on "gut" than on facts. I believe that's the argument we are having. Plus, I notice you chose not to respond to the information about Sopranos' Mafia which was 380+ posts into the game. Care to disparage that one too?
It's also interesting that you don't rebut that it wasn't you who started the thing on bgg. Your argument seems pretty flimsy now. _________________ Paragon Tally: 18 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
raekuul
Lives under a bridge & tells stories.
|
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 2:09 am Post subject: 429 |
|
|
Wow, I forgot that I was in True Blood.
In Jedo's defense(?), this is not the first time he's apparently flip-flopped on a his position between games.
| Jedo the Jedi, during the V Mafia game wrote: |
| I do want to say, I don't think that was the right move to make yesterday, Sentran. You didn't give me a chance to respond back, you didn't allow day to go on for very long so we could get discussion and reactions, and consequently, we didn't have the opportunity to find Anna like I suggested we do. |
| Jedo the Jedi, during True Blood Mafia wrote: |
| Also, if you have a scum in your sights, you lynch them. No sense in waiting around. On MS, I've seen them pick up on a scum-tell which seemed so innocuous and lynch a person by page 3 (and be correct!). |
Though I am intrigued by this repeat performance of the apparent gut-catch. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
raekuul
Lives under a bridge & tells stories.
|
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 2:12 am Post subject: 430 |
|
|
"on a his position"...
Clearly, I should not be allowed to English after bedtime. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
raekuul
Lives under a bridge & tells stories.
|
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 2:14 am Post subject: 431 |
|
|
I need to stop thinking of more to say after leaving the keyboard.
For the curious, Jedo was town in both games. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dragon Phoenix
Judge Doom
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
spyrl
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 4:28 pm Post subject: 433 |
|
|
The bgg lynch was not due to your RVS post. It was due to him digging himself into a very deep hole with his responses to the "we" argument. The first quasi bandwagon on him was dying off. Then the "we" argument got started and he went off the deep end in his replies. And, furthermore, your RVS post is not a "gut read" post! Nowhere in your post is there a reference to "gut reads," instinct, or even feelings. Your post about bgg was completely factual. RVS, but factual. That post did not invalidate the fact that I started the argument that got him lynched. Perhaps I should have worded it to make it clear what I had meant:
| Code: |
| with the infamous "we" debacle I started the chain of subsequent posts that ultimately ended with the lynch of bgg. |
For comprehension, I did mention Amb
| spyrl wrote: |
| Also, catching Amb at scum is like catching MNO, they both look scummy even when they're town, so it's rather like flipping a coin. Half the games I've seen them play as town, I'd have bet money that they were scum. |
To make it clearer, you got lucky with Amb, just like we got lucky with MNO in this game. Both of them are good at playing scummy even when they are town and in both cases could have flipped town just as easily as scum. Also, considering there were at least two others in that game with earlier gut reads (plus factual arguments) on Amb being scum, it wasn't all that impressive. Finally, as for your 384 post being a good example of a "gut read" it's actually another perfect example of a factual post not a "gut" post.
The fact that you keep pushing both of those situations so hard as "gut reads," when in both cases the posts you are referencing are factual, is raising you in my scum list. I originally had reservations about following your "gut read" only because it stuck out as odd, but I didn't think you were scummy for it. Now, I'm beginning to question the scummy part. _________________ "And all those exclamation marks, you notice? Five? A sure sign of someone who wears his underpants on his head." Terry Pratchett, Maskerade
Discworld Mafia is here! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
esme
^^^^-- is female! Get the pronouns right
|
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 4:35 pm Post subject: 434 |
|
|
| 3iff wrote: |
| esme wrote: |
| This would tell you both that I was the first to accuse scum MNOWAX after his blunder and that I started to lurk because I waited for a vote-count. I don't appreciate that our mod has time to prod me, but no time for reasonably frequent vote-counts. |
Yes, esme, great catch, apart from the fact that many players had twigged MNO before you chimed in.
P83, 3iff, first vote on MNO as he was too quiet (semi-random vote)
p134, 3iff, first REAL vote on MNO
p162, "Does MNO know he's in this game?"
p174, Jedo, finds three strikes against MNO
p239+240, 3iff, more criticism of MNO and his excuses for not posting
(plus many posts from others that I haven't bothered to include)
p241+243, esme, "THE? town roleblocker" and an accusation that I'm defending MNO.
So, you FINALLY get involved in the MNO discussion and in p416 you claim credit for being the FIRST to accuse MNO?
Really! You've said absolutely nothing in any of your seven posts.
I have my vote in the right place. Confirm vote: esme |
You must be kidding me that votes against lurkers are an accusation. _________________ Mundus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 4:59 pm Post subject: 435 |
|
|
| spyrl wrote: |
| The bgg lynch was not due to your RVS post. It was due to him digging himself into a very deep hole with his responses to the "we" argument. The first quasi bandwagon on him was dying off. Then the "we" argument got started and he went off the deep end in his replies. And, furthermore, your RVS post is not a "gut read" post! Nowhere in your post is there a reference to "gut reads," instinct, or even feelings. Your post about bgg was completely factual. RVS, but factual. That post did not invalidate the fact that I started the argument that got him lynched. |
The first bandwagon got to L-2 within the page, and it stalled because two of bgg's buddies jumped off the wagon. It never left, and your arguments only reinvigorated it. In fact, people said your post reminded them of why they were voting bgg in the first place, which would have been related to my argument. As for your argument, I rebutted the logic of it, and people agreed with my debunk. In both instances it was bgg's responses which earned him votes, but I was the first to bring it up.
As for Amb, 1) you mentioned Amb only as a casting aside as if he looked scummy in that game, which he didn't; and 2) I knew he was scum. I had to fight uphill to get him lynched, and people started suspecting me. If he had looked scummy, it wouldn't have been so difficult. There was no luck. So, don't sell me that "it wasn't all that impressive" as if it was just a shot in the dark and people were lining up to vote for Amb. You could maybe have tried that with bgg, but not this one.
Finally, I told you a gut read is picking up on a tiny detail which triggers it, not that there are no facts attached at all. Maybe you should post your definition of a gut read so we can at least understand each other. _________________ Paragon Tally: 18 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Garou_Kinfolk
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 6:45 pm Post subject: 436 |
|
|
I feel I should post my definition of what a gut read is to me since I too am calling Jedos "gut read" invalid.
To me a gut read is a feeling. I look at a post and say "I don't know what it is, but this feels off/scummy." or "This feels like a town post to me."
What Jedo has described is more of "I saw this. It looked scummy so I followed it and saw more." That's not a "gut read" to me. Following bread crumbs is the best way I can describe it.
And no. I haven't gotten to a computer to reply to everything I want to yet. _________________ Most posts made from my phone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sentran
Ray of Sucking Funshine
|
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 8:06 pm Post subject: 437 |
|
|
Oh for Pete's sake! I'm starting to see why using meta is not a good idea. Although I'm an advocate of using whatever we can to benefit the town and catch scum, this thread appears to be devolving into a "he said, she said" about old games and what constitutes a gut read. I agree that Jedo looks scummy, but beating that dead horse does us no good today, due to his immunity. Let's get back on track with other potential lynch candidates! I.E. myself, esme, Dragon Phoenix, Garou Kinfolk... pretty much anybody BUT Jedo. We can revisit this argument tomorrow, when there's a hope to get something out of it (like lynching Jedo). _________________ Sentran
"Speaking of double negatives, I haven't read greylab yet today." - Lifeinmomland |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
spyrl
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 8:24 pm Post subject: 438 |
|
|
Jedo, I am finished debating with you on things not directly related to this game in which we are not going to see eye to eye. Your interpretation of the events for that game are duly noted, as are your opinions of the Sopranos game with Amb. With both Amb and MNO it was never just a case where people were "lining up to vote for" them, obviously. What you are being deliberately obtuse about is the whole point of what I had said. Both Amb and MNO have wild play styles which make it like nailing jello to a tree to pinpoint them down, so catching them as scum is more of luck than skill - because people know their play style is unpredictable as both scum and town. As such, a lynch of Amb, as I said before, is "not that great" just like I don't consider the lynch of a scum MNO in this game (or others) to be that great, as the knowledge that we had caught a scum can only be vindicated post-lynch when we know what alignment they were.
Finally, you've, yet again, missed the whole main point of the "gut read" debate. In all of your games you have never voted using "your gut" prior to this game, which is why when you used the phrase, "distrust my gut with you" to justify your vote it stuck out. In both the bgg and the Amb examples, you did not use any phrasing similar, instead, used your normal, logical presentation. You keep returning to things like a "gut read is picking up on a tiny detail which triggers it" as if that will change the facts that you have never cast a vote using the phrasing of "my gut" prior to this game. The fact that you have continued to be so overly sensitive to this reminds me a lot of bggs reaction to the "we" debate, and you are rising in my scum list.
To be clear, my definition of a gut read is quite simple , you state something with the word "gut" in it, like: "my gut tells me X" or "I'm going to have to vote X with my gut" or "I"m going to go with my gut and vote X." _________________ "And all those exclamation marks, you notice? Five? A sure sign of someone who wears his underpants on his head." Terry Pratchett, Maskerade
Discworld Mafia is here! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 8:59 pm Post subject: 439 |
|
|
Fine. We can agree to disagree on those things. My issue is still with the "gut read" thing. What you are saying is that something in the post(s) does spark something with you, and you can't necessarily say what it is. What I'm saying is that the same thing happens to me, but I go a step beyond to analyze what it is that struck me before I say anything. Even doing that though, when I call it a "gut read," the fact is whatever I've come up with as defining that striking thing is still inconsequential.
Anyway, esme, why do you continue not posting any content? The least you could do is respond to the accusations against you. I think the principle is if you are town, you want to convince us you are town, especially since the only reason most of us are voting you right now is because of your lurker status. So either you come in here and work to convince us you are town and we move along to other things, or your response is to ignore what is being said and we interpret that to mean you are indeed scum. _________________ Paragon Tally: 18 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Raearia
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 11:00 pm Post subject: 440 |
|
|
I am personally gonna give Esme until the end of the weekend to hopefully read through the thread and respond. At that point I am just gonna go back over the thread and make my decision to vote for her or not. _________________ 10289 is the end! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|