The Grey Labyrinth is a collection of puzzles, riddles, mind games, paradoxes and other intellectually challenging diversions. Related topics: puzzle games, logic puzzles, lateral thinking puzzles, philosophy, mind benders, brain teasers, word problems, conundrums, 3d puzzles, spatial reasoning, intelligence tests, mathematical diversions, paradoxes, physics problems, reasoning, math, science.

   
The Grey Labyrinth Forum Index
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups    RegisterRegister  
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Werewolf: the Apocalypse Mafia [GAME OVER - Town wins]
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 5, 6, 7 ... 11, 12, 13  Next
 
Reply to topic    The Grey Labyrinth Forum Index -> Mafia Games
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
spyrl
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 6:50 am    Post subject: 201 Reply with quote

Current Vote Count:
Code:
Player (# of votes on them):  {Who’s voting for them}
Sentran (2):    Perpentach, Zag
jadesmar (2):    MNOWAX, Lifeinmomland
Lifeinmomland (3):    jadesmar, Jedo the Jedi, itisally
Durryn (2):  Sentran, Raearia
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Not voting (1):    Durryn

_________________
"And all those exclamation marks, you notice? Five? A sure sign of someone who wears his underpants on his head." Terry Pratchett, Maskerade
Discworld Mafia is here!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training



PostPosted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 1:18 pm    Post subject: 202 Reply with quote

Zag wrote:
Jedo the Jedi wrote:
I was countering Mom's comment that nobody could be sure about anybody else.

This is the one that really has me stuck. If you were a townie who thought LIML was scum, why would you want to explain anything to her? Either you'd ask her questions, hoping to see her trip herself up, or you'd just let her stew. (Hint: I'm doing one of those, now, to someone I suspect is scum.) Why try to help the scum?

Like most good debates through history, the argument is not so much about convincing the other debater, but about convincing the ones listening. By pointing out that Mom (seemingly intentionally) overlooked this option in order to paint jadesmar as scum, others get to see the flaw and evaluate it themselves. I think that's better than going, "See this? Mom is scum!" because 1) it should evoke a response from her of some sort which will likely further the view that she's scum and 2) I don't know 100% that she is scum.

I don't know how you see what I did as helping Momscum. It was very clearly not a "Hey buddy, you forgot to mention this so you don't look scummy" comment. Is that what you are suggesting?
_________________
Paragon Tally: 18 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
Raearia
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 5:58 pm    Post subject: 203 Reply with quote

The current argument going on makes me feel like last game. Where we had us townies arguing back and forth over another townie while the scum sat back and waited for us to shoot ourselves in the foot.

While I see the points being made I am inclined to feel like both Sentran and Zag are town. I am suspicious of Jedo, because I feel like not bringing up EVERY possibility in a post does not mean its a scum tell. I feel like it is a flimsy reason to get on a vote for someone, but again it is day one we don't really have much to go on except what is being posted. I am also suspicious of Jades, but am refraining from voting or really giving it much thought because it is based off of the way he posts not what he is saying.

Yes I know some will argue that with a night phase scum have the advantage, but I don't see how knowing who each other are as MNO pointed out is advantageous when someone else mentioned it is information scum would have in other games starting on day. Unless I am missing the point completely. I have not played scum so I don't know how that works.

I did just wake up so I have no idea if what I just said makes sense or is a jumbled mess of nothing. haha if its a mess I will re-post a translation with a more clear meaning. Otherwise I am off for a bit!
_________________
10289 is the end!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Sentran
Ray of Sucking Funshine



PostPosted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 10:14 pm    Post subject: 204 Reply with quote

Unvote, Vote: Lifeinmomland
This vote switch is in the interest of moving along the quietest day 1 in history. I don't believe her to be the likeliest scum candidate, and I only chose her because she had the greatest number of votes. I feel at this point that if we don't do SOMETHING, we're going to be playing the deadline game.
_________________
Sentran
"Speaking of double negatives, I haven't read greylab yet today." - Lifeinmomland
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Durryn
Doghouse Dweller



PostPosted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 11:52 pm    Post subject: 205 Reply with quote

Vote: Sentranfor jumping on the biggest train, just for it being the biggest. Scummiest thing I have seen day 1

I don't like this vote either, but it is the only really scum worthy ting I have seen anyone do so far.
_________________
If there's anything around here more important than my ego, I want it caught and shot now! - Zaphod Beeblebrox
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Sentran
Ray of Sucking Funshine



PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2013 1:34 am    Post subject: 206 Reply with quote

@Durryn, your unwillingness to vote me when I was voting you, aka OMGUS, has been noted. It appears far more scumworthy (to me) to wait until the vote switches in order to avoid persecution.
_________________
Sentran
"Speaking of double negatives, I haven't read greylab yet today." - Lifeinmomland
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
MNOWAX
0.999... of a Troll



PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2013 5:32 am    Post subject: 207 Reply with quote

okay for anyone who still isn't thinking this through the scum ALSO have more information this game. Their kill for whatever reason didn't go through, which is why they have more info, hence this is why this isn't a normal day one.
_________________
The Man The Myth The Legend
MNOWAX
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Sentran
Ray of Sucking Funshine



PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2013 4:27 pm    Post subject: 208 Reply with quote

MNOWAX wrote:
okay for anyone who still isn't thinking this through the scum ALSO have more information this game. Their kill for whatever reason didn't go through, which is why they have more info, hence this is why this isn't a normal day one.

What gives you that impression? If I were modding a game with an NPC (used for a night 0 kill), I'd use that role to replace the lost player's role. In other words, if there were 10 players, I'd randomly roll 11 roles with the 11th being an NPC. Whoever the mafia targeted on night zero would determine the ROLE killed, not the PLAYER. That targeted player would lose their original role and pick up the NPC's role as a replacement.
I don't feel that the scum necessarily have any more info than any other game, but hopefully the town power roles have gleaned some good info.
_________________
Sentran
"Speaking of double negatives, I haven't read greylab yet today." - Lifeinmomland
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Zag
Tired of his old title



PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2013 8:50 pm    Post subject: 209 Reply with quote

Sentran wrote:
Unvote, Vote: Lifeinmomland
...
I don't believe her to be the likeliest scum candidate, and I only chose her because she had the greatest number of votes.

Well, I was debating who I thought was scummier between Jedo and you. Thanks for making it easy! Enthusiastic Grin

Confirm vote: Sentran
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Durryn
Doghouse Dweller



PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2013 9:24 pm    Post subject: 210 Reply with quote

I wasn't attempting to avoid anything, in fact I didn't believe you were scum until that moment. The reasoning behind my vote on you was very clear and had I noticed anyone else do it, I would have voted there.
_________________
If there's anything around here more important than my ego, I want it caught and shot now! - Zaphod Beeblebrox
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Sentran
Ray of Sucking Funshine



PostPosted: Tue Feb 19, 2013 10:33 pm    Post subject: 211 Reply with quote

1. I am not scum.
2. I am, in fact, town.
3. I have not lied, or even attempted to mislead, in any of my posts.

The reason for this post is simple. Feel free to quote from it when going after the scum after I am lynched and my words are proven.
_________________
Sentran
"Speaking of double negatives, I haven't read greylab yet today." - Lifeinmomland
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
itisally
Master of Disguise



PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 12:53 am    Post subject: 212 Reply with quote

Sentran---- So if Durryn doesn’t OMGUS vote that is scummy, because he should have overreacted when you voted him? Or it is scummy for him to find you suspicious for voting a wagon for wagon sake? Again, I don't see a Durryn Scum here.

In regards to the NPC, yes as a mod I would use it as a replacement in the event of a pc getting killed on night zero, but in the morning that would still report as a death and the player would be informed of their new role. Mafia would know they had been successful. If, on the other hand, the mafia attack was unsuccessful I would have to explain away an extra character, in this case she left by choice.

Does this give Mafia more info? Well they know someone may be on to them, or someone had a onetime invincibility or someone was protected by a doc or..... Whatever, they know a kill didn't happen and they know who they targeted, if they have any investigative type roles they may have used them as well.

Does this give the town more info? Someone knows they were attacked (seen as valuable?) or they are down a invincibility or a cop protected them and so on. We may assume that someone was targeted and it didn't happen, but we don't know. Those with investigative abilities may have information, but shouldn't share blatantly this early in the game.

It is like day 2 with no back story.

I don't think it is enough information to be helpful. What is did give the mafia was a chance to plan. I would assume that thier day one voting and targeting is not as haphazard as it normally is.
_________________
I could agree with you, but then we would both be wrong.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Zag
Tired of his old title



PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 2:14 am    Post subject: 213 Reply with quote

itisally, it looks as if you are likely to be the swing vote. I'm not sure what your reason was for voting LIML, but you clearly are starting to see Sentran's scumminess. Your choice will make the difference, I think, because the people who are waiting in the wings seem likely to stay there. (Even if changing your vote just makes a tie, which I think might be the case, LIML can always make a defensive vote to protect herself.)

OK, so I just went to see your vote on her, and it seemed without conviction. [The phrase that tipped me off to that was "(not with any amount of conviction)" Enthusiastic Grin ] I'm not especially happy about defending her, because I think she is as likely as many to be the third scum, if there is one. But I'm not happy about lynching her today when we have the scum twins of Sentran and Jedo.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
MNOWAX
0.999... of a Troll



PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 3:25 am    Post subject: 214 Reply with quote

At six pages of stuff, we have enough to get to day two. If need be I'll hammer whomever makes it to five if jadesmar doesn't, just to keep the game moving.

For the record, my only true vote this day is jadesmarscum, and he is the only one i think i have a handle on that is scum, folllowed by a lessor likely, but definitely possible, Sentranscum.
_________________
The Man The Myth The Legend
MNOWAX
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
itisally
Master of Disguise



PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 3:45 am    Post subject: 215 Reply with quote

I don't like to vote when I first make an observation, but I have been leaning that way. As I have let it perkolate...

Unvote: LIML
Vote: Sentran

_________________
I could agree with you, but then we would both be wrong.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
jadesmar
Bad Puppy



PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 5:46 am    Post subject: 216 Reply with quote

MNOWAX wrote:
At six pages of stuff, we have enough to get to day two. If need be I'll hammer whomever makes it to five if jadesmar doesn't, just to keep the game moving.

For the record, my only true vote this day is jadesmarscum, and he is the only one i think i have a handle on that is scum, folllowed by a lessor likely, but definitely possible, Sentranscum.


My only vote is LiML, I won't be changing it. No matter how wrong you continue to be about me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training



PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 10:24 am    Post subject: 217 Reply with quote

Sentran wrote:
Unvote, Vote: Lifeinmomland
This vote switch is in the interest of moving along the quietest day 1 in history.

MNOWAX wrote:
If need be I'll hammer whomever makes it to five if jadesmar doesn't, just to keep the game moving.

And the difference here is...?
_________________
Paragon Tally: 18 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
Sentran
Ray of Sucking Funshine



PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 3:19 pm    Post subject: 218 Reply with quote

MNOWAX wrote:
At six pages of stuff, we have enough to get to day two.

Precisely my point, but any scumhunting this game will apparently be treated with disdain and votes. Seriously, most of this game has read like "I see you are asking questions and attempting to scumhunt, but it's much easier to call scum on that than to do anything myself, so I'll just vote you instead."
Only my death will put any truth to my words, so bring it on. Even if we lynch somebody else who IS scum, and I'm on that wagon, I will be seen as bussing a scum buddy. It does not matter than all I have done is try to support and assist the Garou nation. The only escape is death.
_________________
Sentran
"Speaking of double negatives, I haven't read greylab yet today." - Lifeinmomland
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Zag
Tired of his old title



PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 5:13 pm    Post subject: 219 Reply with quote

Actually, it wasn't scum-hunting that got you accused, it was:
A. Asking potentially role-sniffing questions
B. Attacking me when I had the tenacity to accuse you of asking role-sniffing questions.

Since you've never managed to come up with to tell us a reason why you thought only scum would object to you asking your role-sniffing questions, it just looks scummy. OK, it looks scummy anyway. Perhaps because it was scummy?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Sentran
Ray of Sucking Funshine



PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 6:05 pm    Post subject: 220 Reply with quote

@Zag: First, how much should I reveal? I am against role revealing on day 1, but it may be the only way you will possibly understand my motivation for asking such questions.

Second, I notice the word potentially in your first point. This by defenition means it's a possibility that my questions were role sniffing, and therefore also possible that they were not. In point of fact, I had no desire to role-sniff, only to determine affiliation (as in mafia or town). Again, if I wanted to role-sniff, I would ask for tribes.

Third, can you quote where I attacked you for questioning my questions? I do not recall doing that. In fact, I distinctly remember calling you out for saying I was vote jumping when you were proven to be role jumping more than I. Please, enlighten me.
_________________
Sentran
"Speaking of double negatives, I haven't read greylab yet today." - Lifeinmomland
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Durryn
Doghouse Dweller



PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 6:14 pm    Post subject: 221 Reply with quote

"Duty is heavy as a mountain, Death is light as a feather."
_________________
If there's anything around here more important than my ego, I want it caught and shot now! - Zaphod Beeblebrox
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Zag
Tired of his old title



PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2013 8:05 pm    Post subject: 222 Reply with quote

The other stuff is no more or less than you would say if you were scum and you were doing a little role-sniffing.

Sentran wrote:
can you quote where I attacked you for questioning my questions? I do not recall doing that. In fact, I distinctly remember calling you out for saying I was vote jumping when you were proven to be role jumping more than I. Please, enlighten me.


Sentran's fifth post, and pretty easy to find wrote:
Zag wrote:
Sentran wrote:
Is anyone in this game not a werewolf?

Does anyone else see this as a scum tell?

Exactly as suspected.
Unvote, Vote: Zag
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Sentran
Ray of Sucking Funshine



PostPosted: Thu Feb 21, 2013 2:31 am    Post subject: 223 Reply with quote

@Zag: Fair enough, it does indeed look like I voted you for questioning my questions. In actuality my vote was more for the fact that you once again called someone for a scumtell in the form of a question without an accompanying vote. It's a tactic I've seen you use in the past, when scum.

As for the first line of your post, the same could be said of everyone who's bothering to post in this game. In fact, it is. I still want to know how much you feel I should reveal, so that I can potentially prove the purpose of the question you have taken such offense to. Oh, wait, I'm pretty sure that's every question I've asked.
_________________
Sentran
"Speaking of double negatives, I haven't read greylab yet today." - Lifeinmomland
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training



PostPosted: Thu Feb 21, 2013 11:13 am    Post subject: 224 Reply with quote

Zag wrote:
Actually, it wasn't scum-hunting that got you accused, it was:
A. Asking potentially role-sniffing questions
B. Attacking me when I had the tenacity to accuse you of asking role-sniffing questions.

...it looks scummy anyway. Perhaps because it was scummy?

Exactly how stupid do you think Sentran is as scum? Also, I don't see an "attack."
_________________
Paragon Tally: 18 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
Zag
Tired of his old title



PostPosted: Thu Feb 21, 2013 11:35 am    Post subject: 225 Reply with quote

Jedo the Jedi wrote:
Also, I don't see an "attack."

Try to keep up, Jedo. Also, you saw it at the time -- you even defended me.

Jedo the Jedi wrote:
Sentran, I think your reactions here have been extreme, and I don't believe that was some elaborate trap to catch Zag. You should have known he would be the one to jump on you before you even asked the question.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training



PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 10:10 am    Post subject: 226 Reply with quote

I don't see an "attack," but I confess we may be meaning different things. I didn't believe he did that just to catch somebody like you, and I thought his vote was pointless to that end. Apparently he did as well because he confessed it was mostly OMGUS and dropped it pretty quickly when jadesmar came around. If you could explain which part was an attack, that would help.

In the meantime, it seems you have chosen to ignore my questions. No, they weren't particularly targeted at you, but they were asked to the people voting for Sentran as they suggest he is not as scummy as people apparently think. As the unofficial leader of this wagon, your answer is priority for me. After all, I'm just trying to take your advice:
Zag wrote:
Either you'd ask her questions, hoping to see her trip herself up, or you'd just let her stew. (Hint: I'm doing one of those, now, to someone I suspect is scum.)
Interesting that as one who is somewhat scummy, you choose not to answer them.

People voting Sentran, please answer the questions in my two previous posts. I think you need to reconsider your lynch candidate.
_________________
Paragon Tally: 18 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
Zag
Tired of his old title



PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 12:47 pm    Post subject: 227 Reply with quote

In your previous two posts you asked only two questions, one of which was, I assumed, rhetorical. But I'll concede that the other one was a real question and that I haven't answered it -- I'll do so below. I've already pointed out the attack (in post 222) so I won't bother responding to that. If you don't feel that it was enough to justify the word 'attack' then we're just disagreeing over shades of meaning.

Jedo the Jedi wrote:
Sentran wrote:
Unvote, Vote: Lifeinmomland
This vote switch is in the interest of moving along the quietest day 1 in history.

MNOWAX wrote:
If need be I'll hammer whomever makes it to five if jadesmar doesn't, just to keep the game moving.

And the difference here is...?

Very little. Both actions moved the offender up on the scum list in my eyes. The difference is that Sentran was already at the top of my list for his other actions, and MNO was below average (that is, considered somewhat townish) and this post of his moved him back to neutral. On that basis, I didn't feel it warranted mention.

Curiously, if someone who had already listed MNO as high on their list of suspicions had FAILED to mention this, it would move both of them up in my eyes (making me think the earlier accusations were just distancing, and the person is now afraid to point out a real gaff. Unfortunately, I don't think that there is anyone who has posted more than one or two halfhearted mentions of him.

So, for the record, I don't find Jedo to be any more suspicious for pointing this out, nor do I find him any less suspicious it unless MNO turns out to be scum. (.. in which case it earns Jedo some genuine town cred.)

For the record, here is the only other question you, Jedo, asked in your two posts previous to the last one. I assumed it was rhetorical. At least, I hope it was.
Jedo the Jedi wrote:
Exactly how stupid do you think Sentran is as scum?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Durryn
Doghouse Dweller



PostPosted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:48 pm    Post subject: 228 Reply with quote

Um....... Neither of your questions have any bearing on my vote for Sentran and MNO holds the #2 position on my list for the same reason
_________________
If there's anything around here more important than my ego, I want it caught and shot now! - Zaphod Beeblebrox
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Garou_Kinfolk
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Sat Feb 23, 2013 4:16 am    Post subject: 229 Reply with quote

As the game seems to have slowed down, I'm going to institute a Soft Deadline of 1 Week (end of Day 1 would be March 1). This deadline can be extended by majority vote or removed by an increase in posts. I have also proded those who haven't posted in 1 week or more.
_________________
Most posts made from my phone.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jadesmar
Bad Puppy



PostPosted: Sat Feb 23, 2013 4:17 am    Post subject: 230 Reply with quote

Durryn wrote:
Um....... Neither of your questions have any bearing on my vote for Sentran and MNO holds the #2 position on my list for the same reason

Watch out. MNO likes to vote for people that put him high up on their scum list.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training



PostPosted: Sat Feb 23, 2013 3:16 pm    Post subject: 231 Reply with quote

Zag wrote:
I've already pointed out the attack (in post 222)

Zag pointed out in post 222 wrote:
Sentran's fifth post, and pretty easy to find wrote:
Zag wrote:
Sentran wrote:
Is anyone in this game not a werewolf?

Does anyone else see this as a scum tell?

Exactly as suspected.
Unvote, Vote: Zag

Voting equals attacking then? I see. You've done a helluva lot of attacking then. And gosh, my back-and-forth with you must be a friendly chat.

Zag wrote:
Jedo the Jedi wrote:
And the difference here is...?

Very little. Both actions moved the offender up on the scum list in my eyes.

At least you are equal opportunity.

Zag wrote:
So, for the record, I don't find Jedo to be any more suspicious for pointing this out, nor do I find him any less suspicious it unless MNO turns out to be scum.

I like this, though it doesn't matter one hill of beans. I don't think either of them are suspicious for wanting to move the game along since we've been going at this for a month. Before Sentran moved his vote, nobody was talking much, and people certainly weren't budging in their stances. Then suddenly, "Oh my! Sentran is scum!" Please. Which leads me to...

Zag wrote:
I assumed it was rhetorical. At least, I hope it was.
Jedo the Jedi wrote:
Exactly how stupid do you think Sentran is as scum?

It was only rhetorical insofar as it got people to think. What scum would say?
Sentran wrote:
This vote switch is in the interest of moving along the quietest day 1 in history. I don't believe her to be the likeliest scum candidate, and I only chose her because she had the greatest number of votes.

How would he hide behind that later? How would he not think that would draw all kinds of attention to him? How is Sentran more scummy for speaking his mind than Mom who has dropped off the planet? Considering she's pretty much the second target--and she can't very well come OMGUS Sentran without becoming more suspicious--it's no wonder she isn't around. Those things aren't scummy though, and being boldly in the open is.

I didn't know I was modding a second game of Bizarro Mafia.
_________________
Paragon Tally: 18 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
Perpentach
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Sun Feb 24, 2013 2:41 am    Post subject: 232 Reply with quote

Jedo the Jedi wrote:

I like this, though it doesn't matter one hill of beans. I don't think either of them are suspicious for wanting to move the game along since we've been going at this for a month. Before Sentran moved his vote, nobody was talking much, and people certainly weren't budging in their stances. Then suddenly, "Oh my! Sentran is scum!" Please. Which leads me to...


Really, because changing my vote to Sentran was for moving his vote. In fact I didn't have a stance before my vote, ally hasn't responded to you, and Durryn told you that your questions aren't relevant to his vote. So when you talk about people voting for Sentran, you're really talking about Zag.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lifeinmomland
Soccer, dance, doctor's appt. this AM.



PostPosted: Sun Feb 24, 2013 2:58 am    Post subject: 233 Reply with quote

I see a stalemate. FYI. I have been ill in between girl scout cookie booths resulting in being quieter than usual. I am reading along though. My plans for tonight include reading through the verbose posts again to see if any can sway me, though as yet none have convinced me. Confused Then topping it off with much chicken broth and hours of un interrupted sleep.
_________________
Who is John Gult?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training



PostPosted: Sun Feb 24, 2013 1:19 pm    Post subject: 234 Reply with quote

Perpentach wrote:
Jedo the Jedi wrote:
I like this, though it doesn't matter one hill of beans. I don't think either of them are suspicious for wanting to move the game along since we've been going at this for a month. Before Sentran moved his vote, nobody was talking much, and people certainly weren't budging in their stances. Then suddenly, "Oh my! Sentran is scum!" Please. Which leads me to...

Really, because changing my vote to Sentran was for moving his vote. In fact I didn't have a stance before my vote, ally hasn't responded to you, and Durryn told you that your questions aren't relevant to his vote. So when you talk about people voting for Sentran, you're really talking about Zag.

Which part of this was supposed to be a counter to that quote? I'll get to your vote in a minute, but ally switched specifically because of Sentran's move to Mom, as did Durryn. Zag even persuaded ally and confirmed his vote because of the same. So that's three of the four whose impetus was Sentran voting Mom to move the game along. Prior to that, there was a lack of any sort of consensus going on, and Zag was hip-hopping all over the place.

Now to your vote of Sentran. You say the reason for your vote is the same as the others I'm lambasting, but yours was prior to this incident. You must mean then that you voted Sentran for moving his vote around before this. You didn't like him going from Zag to jadesmar to Durryn? But you were okay with Zag going from Sentran to Mom to Jedo to Mom? Hardly good reasoning then.

And not having a stance is the same as apathy which is a stance from which people weren't moving.
_________________
Paragon Tally: 18 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
Zag
Tired of his old title



PostPosted: Sun Feb 24, 2013 5:31 pm    Post subject: 235 Reply with quote

I've already admitted that my voting might seem like vote jumping, but I haven't bothered to defend it because I don't care that much what you and Sentran think. However, now that a third person (including me) has brought it up, I guess I should explain.

.J. Just a joke vote for Jedo.
...........S. Sentran seems to be vote-sniffing, in a sideways fashion
.................S. and he attacks me for accusing him of it.
.................S.
.................S.
.....................................................L. Oh, jadesmar is a cop! That's why he's
.....................................................L. so hot after LIML on such lame evidence
.....................................................L.
.........................................................................................J. Jedo, the ass, has outed our cop!!
.....................................................L. Ok, calm down. Vote on logic, not anger
.....................................................L.
.....................................................L.
.................S. jadesmar denies being a cop, vote returns to Sentran
.................S.
.................S.
.................S. and stays there.

Here is my voting history, and why. It's really only two actual votes, with a brief interlude of anger.
1. Joke vote.
2. I've suspected Sentran ever since he pursued what seemed to me like vote sniffing, and then attacked me for pointing it out.
3. I moved to LIML when I thought jadesmar was really a cop and his vote was the result of investigation.
4. I was totally pissed off at Jedo for what I thought was outing our cop. This vote was just anger, not logic.
5. Return to the "correct" vote
6. The basis for that vote goes away, return to the one I still find most suspicious.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Zag
Tired of his old title



PostPosted: Sun Feb 24, 2013 5:49 pm    Post subject: 236 Reply with quote

Similar analysis for Sentran. I've put his "reason" for the vote, followed by what I see as his reason. Of course, the reasons I put are filtered through my own vision of already seeing him as scum, so YMMV.

1. Jadesmar. "using the lamest day 1 reason short of a die roll. "
(i.e. that band-wagon hasn't got legs, so I'm not going to jump on it. Maybe I can start one here.

2. Zag. "Exactly as suspected."
(Zag's always a good target, because he's vocal and not afraid to mix it up.)

3, jadesmar. No actual reason stated. (#9 in his ISO. You figure it out.)
(Oh, it looks like that bandwagon is catching steam. I should get back on it before doing so looks suspicious.)

4. Durryn. "I have been mulling this thought over, and sleeping on it, but I can't seem to shake it. The more I look over it, the more jades' comments seem intended to find scum (although I'm not sure I agree with the methods). That leads me to an unexplored road... "
(Darn, that bandwagon is breaking down, and I don't want to get on the LIML one because [I already ridiculed the reason for it / she's my scum buddy]. Let's throw some new mud on the wall and see if it sticks.)

5. LIML. "This vote switch is in the interest of moving along the quietest day 1 in history. I don't believe her to be the likeliest scum candidate,"
(Well, I can't actually say that I suddenly see her as suspicious, or someone will point out how I ridiculed the reason behind jadesmar's initial vote. Maybe everyone is sick enough of day 1 that this will slip by.)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Sentran
Ray of Sucking Funshine



PostPosted: Sun Feb 24, 2013 5:49 pm    Post subject: 237 Reply with quote

Unvote. Vote: Zag

Prior to this game, I looked up to Zag as the player I wanted to emulate. His reads were solid, his instincts uncanny. When he played scum, my respect for him grew even more.

Then... this game happened.

Zag is being an idiot. He has actively chosen to highlight certain "tells" while ignoring questions posed to him. Now he even admits that he has chosen not to defend himself because he doesn't care what we think. This is a good tactic I've used in the past... when scum. If you ignore the arguments brought against you and just keep on playing, other players will usually forget them. Instead, it's defending yourself that gets you noticed. Case in point: me.

I am not scum, I am town. My role is that of Garou Kinfolk (yes, just like the moderator). I will not divulge my powers at this time. The reason I started asking questions was twofold. First, as Kinfolk, I am not Garou (werewolf). Most non-Garou roles will likely be scum or anti-town. Since I am possibly the only one that is town, I expect that all others will be scum. Second, I want discussion! Too many quiet players in a game have led to a month of too few posts, and very little day 1 momentum.

I am intending to double-post. My next post will be my reads and why I have voted for those individuals. If you don't care to read it, ignore it. But understand that everything I've done has been for town.
_________________
Sentran
"Speaking of double negatives, I haven't read greylab yet today." - Lifeinmomland
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Zag
Tired of his old title



PostPosted: Sun Feb 24, 2013 5:51 pm    Post subject: 238 Reply with quote

Oh, I forgot to put my other possible interpretation for Sentran's final vote:

(Here come da bus, here come da bus. Don't look now 'cause here come da bus.)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Sentran
Ray of Sucking Funshine



PostPosted: Sun Feb 24, 2013 6:04 pm    Post subject: 239 Reply with quote

My votes have targeted only 4 people: jadesmar, Zag, Durryn, and Lifeinmomland. Here are my reasons for each.

Jadesmar was my first (and third) vote, for a poor vote choice. LIML asked what I felt was an innocuous question, and jades voted her for it. I saw no scumtell in the question, but noted it for future reference to watch LIML for clues. The third vote was for a ridiculous argument with MNO, combined with what I perceived as a dodge to claim town.

I voted for Durryn because he has patently refused to claim a side. Look over his ISO. I caught that early in the game, and then I started looking to other players for the same thing. In case there is a truth-determining power in the game (such as Truth of Gaia), the best defense would be to tell the truth, or to lie by omission.

LIML got my vote, as I stated, to try to get the game rolling. It's been far too quiet for a day 1, and we will not gain any ground if everyone just lets 4-5 people run the show.

That leaves Zag. His first look at me consisted of a subtle claim of my scumminess, without an accompanying vote. This is a good psychological play, in that he can begin a wagon against me without casting the first vote. If nobody else agrees, he can turn his sights elsewhere without anyone catching on to his play. He's used this tactic in the past, as scum. My last vote, again for him, is because he just feels off this game.

I'm also watching Jedo closely. Well, I'm watching everyone, but I'm paying particular attention to Jedo. He appears to be trying to cozy up to me, and my paranoia kicked in. I'm not sure if this is because he actually agrees with me, or because he's scum and trying to get the support of a townie for his later use.

That's enough wall for today. Make of it what you will.
_________________
Sentran
"Speaking of double negatives, I haven't read greylab yet today." - Lifeinmomland
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Perpentach
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Sun Feb 24, 2013 8:04 pm    Post subject: 240 Reply with quote

Jedo the Jedi wrote:

Now to your vote of Sentran. You say the reason for your vote is the same as the others I'm lambasting, but yours was prior to this incident. You must mean then that you voted Sentran for moving his vote around before this. You didn't like him going from Zag to jadesmar to Durryn? But you were okay with Zag going from Sentran to Mom to Jedo to Mom? Hardly good reasoning then.


When did I ever say that? I said I voted for Sentran because I'm still suspicious of his scum-sniffing method. And are you trying to convince me that I should vote for Zag, or just that I shouldn't vote for Sentran.

Quote:
And not having a stance is the same as apathy which is a stance from which people weren't moving.


How exactly? Everyone is voting, so everyone has a stance, not just apathy. Also that sentence gives me a headache. Not having a stance is a stance?[/quote]
_________________
All questions must be stated in the form of an answer.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous: by   
Reply to topic    The Grey Labyrinth Forum Index -> Mafia Games All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 5, 6, 7 ... 11, 12, 13  Next
Page 6 of 13

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Site Design by Wx3