| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
zorT Kitty
Oboe! Another bassoonist!
|
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2003 2:34 am Post subject: 1 |
|
|
http://www.ebaumsworld.com/trigrid.html
I can't seem to figure this one out. There's a slight difference in angles, and I dont think they form 2 big triangles and rather form quadrilaterals, but it doesn't seem enough to compensate for the empty box. At 9:30 it's past my bedtime and I can't think clearly, so if you can help it'd be greatly appreciated. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Beartalon
'Party line' kind of guy
|
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2003 2:38 am Post subject: 2 |
|
|
In order for this initial triangle to exist, the red and green must be similar.
The ratio of non-hypoteneuse sides for the green is 2/5.
The ratio of non-hypoteneuse sides for the red is 3/8.
Because 2/5 <> 3/8, the first triangle is NOT a real triangle, it just looks close, and it lets them pull of the missing square trick.
[This message has been edited by Beartalon (edited 11-04-2003 09:39 PM).] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lilifreid
DANGER!
|
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2003 2:44 am Post subject: 3 |
|
|
The slope on the red triangle is 3/8, or 15/40.
The slope on the green triangle is 2/5, or 16/40.
So, neither assembly of pieces forms a true triangle. The "hypotenuse" on the top assembly is slightly concave, while the "hypotenuse" on the lower assembly is slightly convex. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lilifreid
DANGER!
|
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2003 2:49 am Post subject: 4 |
|
|
| Sorry, I typed slow. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mercuria
Merc's Husband's Wife!
|
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2003 2:58 am Post subject: 5 |
|
|
<hugs lili>
it's okay, we don't think you copied the answer or anything =] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kazooish
The Moofin Man
|
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2003 3:21 am Post subject: 6 |
|
|
long time no hear from me...its me who was talking to katie about this...
i made my own....which definitly started as a triangle...and definitly appeared as a triangle afterwords, with the extra square there....maybe my second configuration wasnt ar eal triangle...but at least one of them is. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lilifreid
DANGER!
|
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2003 3:24 am Post subject: 7 |
|
|
| What do you mean, made your own? Drawn or cut out? Either technique has a large enough margin of error that it will still look to work out as in the picture. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lilifreid
DANGER!
|
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2003 3:27 am Post subject: 8 |
|
|
Think of it this way: If you construct a right triangle that has a leg 5 units long and a leg 13 units long, will the hypotenuse ever exactly intersect a lattice point on the grid?
[This message has been edited by Lilifreid (edited 11-04-2003 10:28 PM).] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bicho the Inhaler
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2003 4:08 am Post subject: 9 |
|
|
| Here's yet another thing to notice: the area of a right triangle with legs 5 and 13 is 65/2 = 32.5, but the sum of the areas of the colored shapes is 32, which is almost, but not quite, 32.5. This should tell you that something in the drawing is only approximate. (As others have pointed out, the "hypotenuse" is not exactly straight.) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
zorT Kitty
Oboe! Another bassoonist!
|
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2003 3:06 am Post subject: 10 |
|
|
| cool. thanks. it all makes sense now! wow. what a novelty. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Macros
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2003 7:52 pm Post subject: 11 |
|
|
i think the GL coulld do with a section of optical illusions, for younger puzzlers and the stupider people (me)
i think it was mentioned before |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|