LOST mafia - Game Thread - GAME OVER!

[Nauplius]

[wldhrtcgd99]

I just finished reading the thread in whole. I HAVE to claim now either way so the timing works well.

Danielle, One Shot Vigilante. I have the ability to trap one person to keep the town safe. With that...

vote pete d for obvious reasons.

If there is a SK and Mafia, and a multi shot Vig, then why dont these numbers add up?

As for the guilty result I dont know. Weve found a paranoid cop, so with the clues that gives us on the set up it's not completely out there for it to be untrue.

[Primate]

Ok.

That genuinely does work as a miller given my flavour. We need to mass claim.

[wldhrtcgd99]

I agree

[Primate]

[ChannelDelibird]

Primate, have I missed your complete claim, and if I haven't, could you please make it?

I'm up for a mass claim. Who's going to decide who goes first?
_________________
The CDB Desk blog

[Primate]

[wldhrtcgd99]

[ChannelDelibird]

Fair enough.

I'm Jin, theo's mason buddy.
_________________
The CDB Desk blog

[pete d]

vote: wld

a multi shot vig and a 1 shot vig seems unlikely. add that to primates guilty result and wld's quick vote on me.

my targets: n1 yamahako n2 narnian

leaning towards targetting cdb 2nite.

if anyone forgot, my claim is kate the vig.

i am not mafia because mnowax took me on and 1 of us had to get lynched. as for a SK, does my behaviour on day 1 reflect a SK? (sorry if this is wifom).

[pete d]

(that is, a cdb kill tonight presuming wld is lynched today)

[ChannelDelibird]

Big, Big FoS: pete d

You're considering killing the only confirmed player in the town? I'm 100% confirmed innocent unless some idiotic scum thinks they can survive and win the game by counterclaiming a mason. Even if they were to convince you guys to lynch me they'd be exposed as scum for it and would therefore lose the game.

This should be a vote, but I have no reason to disbelieve your claim.
_________________
The CDB Desk blog

[Primate]

Hmm, I didn't have you pegged as the mason. Fair enough though.

unvote

We're mass claiming. We are not lynching anyone yet.

[wldhrtcgd99]

[ChannelDelibird]

[Nauplius]

I guess I'm next to claim. I'm Sawyer. I don't want to reveal what my role can do at this time, but my voting record should be enough to prove I'm on the towns side.

[pete d]

i totally missed cdb claiming jin. SORRY. i'm an idiot. i completely withdraw any death threats to cdb.

[pete d]

summary of claims:

1. Primate ~ ?, cop, reasonably innocent

2. wld ~ Danielle, 1 shot vig, potentially anti-town character

4. Nauplius ~ Sawyer, ? ability, pro-town character

5. Channeldelibird ~ Jin, mason, 100% townie confirmed if no counter claim

7. Green Crayons ~ no claim yet

i also don't trust the character of Danielle, who is potentially dangerous and unstable.

if i wasnt a vig, i might be able to buy the claim of a 1 shot vig / miller. as it is, i don't.

[ChannelDelibird]

[Primate]

@Naupilus. Good name claim, obviously. I could understand your reticence if we were in a different situation, however bear in mind that we have a confirmed mason and a sane cop exisiting, with no godfather around. There's no way in hell that you're going to be targetted by a nightkill tonight unless you claim something uber. If you're untargetable/un-nk/roleblocker, it would be much better for us to know today, seeing as it's more efficient for cops to work around RB's than vice versa, and anything that relies on you being targetted by a nightkill has a very slim chance of pulling off.

I'll outline my plan once we have Green Crayon's claim. It's not a particularly innovative plan, but it'll do.

[Green Crayons]

Sorry, I'm here.

I'm Boon. I'm eager to help out, save humanity and be part of the in-crowd on the Island or whatever, hoping to save everyone. As a result, I have a few one-shot abilities, none of which have turned up anything useful or unexpected so far.

For the record, I'm comfortable following Primate's lead, and no, a one-shot vig is not part of my ability.

[Nauplius]

[pete d]

I find Green's role claim somewhat dubious, as I would not consider Boon a central character. Fos: GreenCrayons

[ChannelDelibird]

Yeah, in a game set in season 2, I'm not sure Boone would appear. Also, I don't know if it's worth pointing out the lack of an 'e' in the name claim. That's probably a typo but possibly someone not having a role PM to verify their name with.

Naupilus - I think we're going to want everything out in the open.
_________________
The CDB Desk blog

[Primate]

[Nauplius]

Vote: Green Crayons

His claim is simply the weakest. wld...99's claim is the next weakest, maybe we should consider having pete vig him?/her? tonight if it comes to that.

[Primate]

I'm of the opinion that the best play might be to point our two vigs at one another.

[ChannelDelibird]

[Primate]

Hey, don't lynch yet. Depending on what GC claims his one-shots are, best play could be to no lynch.

Also, speedwagons based on bad claims are disgusting. We're not under a deadline, lets get this sorted before we make a move.

[pete d]

unvote works for me. GC has already said that he's not a vig.

[ChannelDelibird]

*thread-prod*

Mod: could we get a prod on Green Crayons please?
_________________
The CDB Desk blog

[Green Crayons]

Sorry, no need for prod, I'm busy with revising for exams. Check my other threads, I haven't been posting.

Abilities:
1. One-shot investigation. Investigated Primate Night Two, he's innocent. I'm thinking he's Hurley from my description, but it was left vague so that's just my best guess from what I know of the show. For the record, I was given both a description as well as a innocent/guilty result.
2. One-shot roleblock. This is combined with a house-sitting (or whatever it's called) ability, where whomever I target I not only block for the night, but I also spend the night over there at his house (or tent, apparently). That way, if I'm the target of a night action, it fails. If my target is the target of a night action, it applies to both of us. I don't know if this refers to only kill actions or to others (investigations, roleblocking, etc, etc), it wasn't specificied in my PM. I targeted Narninian Night One.
3. Target two players. Player 1's ability will be redirected to Player 2. Haven't used this one yet.
4. "Sacrifice myself to the Island." I wasn't told what this would do, only that it would be beneficial for the town but with my death as a result. I chose it during the night (but not in place of my night action), and it occurs on the following day in the post-lynch scene. Haven't used this one yet either.

[ChannelDelibird]

[pete d]

this is stupid. consider this: wld pretty much thinks i'm scum by the flavour of her posts, so will most likely target me tonight anyway, thus no proof on GC's claim.

@ GC: I could think of many far more prominant characters than Boone, eg Claire, Charlie, Michael off the top of my head. The Locke / Boone connection does make sense though.

@ Cdb: I'm interested to know why you think I'm scummier than Wld, (hence the suggestion of targetting me tonight) where I am an obvious pro town character and wld is a supposedly miller vig.

there is a simple plan. we have 2 definate innocents (cdb and primate), 2 probably innocents (me and naupilus) and two dubious claims (GC and wld). solution: lynch GC today, me and wld will target each other tonight (as each is convinced the other is scum). Primate can investigate Naupilus tonight. If Naupilus does have a RB ability, I would ask him to not use it tonight.

vote:GreenCrayons

On the off chance that wld is a scum RB, if he is still alive tomorrow, Primate should have his result on Naupilus, so you have an obvious lynch.

[ChannelDelibird]

[Primate]

Naupilus, I think it's come to the point where we need to know what you do. I am an uncounterclaimed cop with an innocent investigation on me. CDB is an uncounterclaimed mason. We can kill everyone except us three by tomorrow, and it's the best play to do so. Thing is, despite your voting record, I'm not convinced enough to put you in the confirmed list. If any of us three is scum, they can simply kill another one of the three and endgame the other one. That's what we must avoid.

Fwiw, I think GC is talking out of his ass with that claim.

[Green Crayons]

[quote=pete]there is a simple plan. we have 2 definate innocents (cdb and primate), 2 probably innocents (me and naupilus) and two dubious claims (GC and wld). solution: lynch GC today, me and wld will target each other tonight (as each is convinced the other is scum). Primate can investigate Naupilus tonight. If Naupilus does have a RB ability, I would ask him to not use it tonight.[/quote]For this plan to actually work, the town has to make some pretty major assumptions about not only the framework of the game (roles, abilities, etc), but also about who will follow through with what actions.

[Primate]

#1: The previous day you express large suspicion towards a player, then proceed to investigate someone who totally different.

#2:I find it odd that you receive details considering rolenames when my character actually goes up to people and has conversations with them, in my results PM, and I get absolutely no hint about roles at all.

#3: The claim is so much more complicated than everything we've experienced so far it's untrue. It seems completely out of character for this game.

#4: Most obscure role name of all, even including Danielle.

#5: "Sacrifice yourself to the Island". The timing of the kill, in the post-lynch scene, seems bizzarre, and too convenient for a scum.

[Nauplius]

[ChannelDelibird]

*thread-prod*
_________________
The CDB Desk blog