|
|
|
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Tseirp
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 11:03 pm Post subject: 441 |
|
|
I dont honestly know where to go for now, the game has sort of stalled out. I sort of belive adele, I sort of dont. All I can say about Adele is repeat that I hope to hell you are telling the truth.
As for leads, I am a bit suspicious of wld, as I have been for quite a while (since even before wld replaced into the game).
For Duke, I havent seen enough to actually vote for him.
Because of that, I will remain voteless. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wldhrtcgd99
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 12:23 am Post subject: 442 |
|
|
| It's probably the truth because it meshes with my role perfectly. I think we should keep going after Duke. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
IH
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 2:11 am Post subject: 443 |
|
|
....vote:DukeBanks
I think we have time to try and prove if Adele is innocent or not. = D [/b] _________________ "Yet to be quoted from Pj"
-Pj |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TopHat
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 3:51 am Post subject: 444 |
|
|
Just wanted to say something in case: right now we're probably 5/1/1 town/mafia/SK. Absolute worst case for us, we lynch an innocent today and two innocents die at night, and we wake up at 2/1/1. In this case, the town should NOT try to lynch scum, since lynching the SK hands the win to the mafia, and vice versa.
What the townies should do in this case, is either deadlock the vote to no-lynch, or try to actually lynch an innocent, insane as it may sound. In this case, night starts at 1/1/1, and we have a chance to win by crosskill. In fact, if I'm alive tomorrow in this scenario, I volunteer to lynch myself. If not, well, just lynch whoever seems the most town, or no-lynch.
Again, this is just a contingency scenario in case the @#$! hits the fan. Otherwise, ignore. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Adele
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 4:34 am Post subject: 445 |
|
|
| TopHat wrote: |
Adele,
Why won't you practice what you preach then and drop a 3rd vote on ol' Duke? That'll certainly encourage him to claim, eh? |
Oh, yes, let's lynch a replacement before he's been in the game more'n a couple days. That way we'll have nothing useful to go off.
Dukebanks is not at lynch-1. A single extra vote on him, whether from town, scum or sk, ends the day and practically pitches us into endgame. I'd like to here from the other gossiper - owning up, and a claim, ideally - I'd like to hear a lot more from Duke (since if he was just posting his first reaction, it's a shame to drop him on the basis of that one post) and I'd really like people to not be too lynch-happy today. There's no reason for it to end up like yesterday, which was extreme, but I'd really like as good a lynch today as is possible. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AlexTiefling
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 9:51 am Post subject: 446 |
|
|
Bah! Go town!
AT |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Adele
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 2:15 pm Post subject: 447 |
|
|
| Adele wrote: |
| Dukebanks is not at lynch-1 |
I coulda sworn I said
| Adele shoulda wrote: |
| Dukebanks is at lynch-1 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TopHat
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 9:15 pm Post subject: 448 |
|
|
| Adele wrote: |
| TopHat wrote: |
Adele,
Why won't you practice what you preach then and drop a 3rd vote on ol' Duke? That'll certainly encourage him to claim, eh? |
Oh, yes, let's lynch a replacement before he's been in the game more'n a couple days. That way we'll have nothing useful to go off.
Dukebanks is not at lynch-1. A single extra vote on him, whether from town, scum or sk, ends the day and practically pitches us into endgame. I'd like to here from the other gossiper - owning up, and a claim, ideally - I'd like to hear a lot more from Duke (since if he was just posting his first reaction, it's a shame to drop him on the basis of that one post) and I'd really like people to not be too lynch-happy today. There's no reason for it to end up like yesterday, which was extreme, but I'd really like as good a lynch today as is possible. |
IH was right, you really are showing an irregular amount of mercy. Jury still out on whether it's good or bad. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Adele
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 11:25 pm Post subject: 449 |
|
|
I'd really hate to lose just because people got bored or lynch-happy. The guy has more votes to his name than posts. That's ridiculous. If it's irregular for me to be this cautious, okay, sorry, whatever. It feels normal to me but then, doesn't it always?
I'm gonna consider every post lacking a "I sent the Adele=Scum gossip" claim a "I didn't" claim from here on in. If you did it, 'fess up.
btw, In case it's still not clear, I gossiped as a way of codifying my investigations; I hope (f'rexample) if I'd been murdered last night instead of AT you could've looked at my posting history, seen my one-a-day commitment and extrapolated that Tseirp was cop-cleared. That's why I said "everyone who can gossip should gossip as much as they can", and it's why I didn't claim the gossip as my own until now. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TopHat
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 11:34 pm Post subject: 450 |
|
|
| Adele wrote: |
| I'd really hate to lose just because people got bored or lynch-happy. The guy has more votes to his name than posts. |
The onus on remedying this situation lies mostly on him. I would like to see him having more posts, not necessarily less votes. But yeah, no hammering yet!
In fact, Unvote just in case. However, Duke, consider yourself virtually at 3 votes still. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DukeBanks
Icarian Member
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 11:44 pm Post subject: 451 |
|
|
Sorry for the lack of posts, guys. I've been loaded up with schoolwork. Anyhow, there's one thing that I want to clarify. I wasn't completely pointing a FoS at Adele there, it was just based on initial reactions. As for the comments on lynching, I would have to say that this one is crucial. A bit obvious, I realize, but there is a possibility of 2 innocents killed tonight, which would leave us balanced rather precariously. I don't really see how sacrificing an innocent would help, though, as someone stated. _________________ 60% of the time it works all the time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TopHat
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 11:48 pm Post subject: 452 |
|
|
| I find your lack of claim disturbing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DukeBanks
Icarian Member
|
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 1:39 am Post subject: 453 |
|
|
RC: mason _________________ 60% of the time it works all the time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
IH
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 1:43 am Post subject: 454 |
|
|
So... how many masons would we have then?
-_-;;
I think a ======[ ] is in order. _________________ "Yet to be quoted from Pj"
-Pj |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Josh-oo-wuh
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 6:05 am Post subject: 455 |
|
|
| DukeBanks wrote: |
| RC: mason |
Reeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaaaallyyyyyyy???
That's a bold move, brotha.
Know why?
I'm a mason.
And I'll do ya one better:
Livingod was my mason partner.
Now...
Tell me just why it is we shouldn't lynch you. My vote is at the ready. Better do some mighty fine 'splaining. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Josh-oo-wuh
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 6:07 am Post subject: 456 |
|
|
EBWOP
Dammit. I meant to say lazarusmoth was my partner, NOT Livingod.
But still, double-you-tee-eff Duke? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TopHat
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 1:57 pm Post subject: 457 |
|
|
| DukeBanks, who were you mason with? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TopHat
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 2:12 pm Post subject: 458 |
|
|
Also, AFTER DukeBanks responds to the question above, I suggest we do a full claim. Adele, myself and Josh already have claims out there, Tseirp (being investigated innocent) should claim last, so I suggest the order is:
1. Duke clarifies his mason partner
2. IH
3. wldhrt
4. Tseirp |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tseirp
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 7:51 pm Post subject: 459 |
|
|
Ok...so josh is partnered with moth, TopHat is partnered with Livingod, and Duke is partnered as well? Im not buying the claim of a third pair of masons, Duke is trying to hide something.
Vote:Duke |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TopHat
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 8:06 pm Post subject: 460 |
|
|
| You are kindly requested not to hammer yet. We need closure on the claims. Also, if (against all odds) we do wind up in a 2-1-1 endgame tomorrow, please remember post 444. Thanks in advance. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tseirp
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 10:06 pm Post subject: 461 |
|
|
| Honestly, with Adele now clean (to me currently), I feel that the main lead is towards Duke, and if he really wants to go and not tell us who his partner is, then he is trying to hide something, and is lying about his role. Unless he is Mafia/SK, why would he lie about his role, and why would we have 6 masons in the game? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Adele
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:22 am Post subject: 462 |
|
|
As far as I'm concerned, Dukebanks was counterclaimed by Josh, and one of the two is scum (unless we get a third claim, exactly one). If we have a vig in the house, then it's a simple case of lynch one vig other, but if not, then from my POV there are two bad guys left standing:
Josh OR Duke (I've distrusted Josh for yonks, so it's 50-50 for me)
AND
Wldcrd OR IH
(this is assuming that Tophat's not a scum-mason and Tseirp's not inv-immune SK, which both seem fair assumptions in a game with a dead GF)
Just wanted to raise that point. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pete d
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:44 am Post subject: 463 |
|
|
| You hear a rumour that DukeBanks is innocent! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pete d
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:45 am Post subject: 464 |
|
|
vote count:
DukeBanks (3): wld, IH, Tseirp
not voting (4): DukeBanks, Adele, Josh, TopHat
it takes 4 to lunch |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Adele
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 2:48 am Post subject: 465 |
|
|
| Sorry, no dice. If the gossiper wants to influence me, he'll need to say who he is and how he knows the stuff. The existance of the rumour is of no use by itself. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Josh-oo-wuh
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 3:21 am Post subject: 466 |
|
|
I want to address Adele's last two posts, starting with the most recent. I agree that the gossip alone really doesn't help. I'm just ignoring it.
As for the other post, here it is, with a bolded emphasis added by me:
| Adele wrote: |
As far as I'm concerned, Dukebanks was counterclaimed by Josh, and one of the two is scum (unless we get a third claim, exactly one). If we have a vig in the house, then it's a simple case of lynch one vig other, but if not, then from my POV there are two bad guys left standing:
Josh OR Duke (I've distrusted Josh for yonks, so it's 50-50 for me)
AND
Wldcrd OR IH
(this is assuming that Tophat's not a scum-mason and Tseirp's not inv-immune SK, which both seem fair assumptions in a game with a dead GF)
Just wanted to raise that point. |
Correct me if I'm wrong, but are you proposing that we kill off two people where only one is scum? This would be especially odd if we did lynch one of the two you suggest, they turn up scum, and we STILL lynch the other.
The idea sounds so asinine that I can't imagine I'm reading your post correctly, because if that's what you mean you're just plain bonkers or scum. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TopHat
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 2:09 pm Post subject: 467 |
|
|
| I believe she meant, lynch one, and if he's innocent vig the other. At least that's how I'm reading it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DukeBanks
Icarian Member
|
Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 9:40 pm Post subject: 468 |
|
|
Yeah, I'm gonna have to agree with TopHat here. _________________ 60% of the time it works all the time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Josh-oo-wuh
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 10:35 pm Post subject: 469 |
|
|
| Ah, okay. That makes a lot more sense. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Adele
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 12:13 am Post subject: 470 |
|
|
| TopHat wrote: |
| I believe she meant, lynch one, and if he's innocent vig the other. At least that's how I'm reading it. |
That wasn't implied? Sorry, Josh.
And I'm talking lynch-one-vig other, since what was said earlier about us potentially going into 2-1-1 tomorrow was true, so if we don't have a vig, the plan's moot. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TopHat
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Thu Feb 08, 2007 2:26 pm Post subject: 471 |
|
|
Riiiight,
So, DukeBanks passed on the opportunity to clarify his claim, and he's definitely the lynch for today. I'd like to hear some more from IH and wldhrt, and then we'll be ready to hammer. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
IH
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 2:51 am Post subject: 472 |
|
|
Tophat, I'd like you to explain the order of your massclaim.
In other words, why did you want that order to go. _________________ "Yet to be quoted from Pj"
-Pj |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TopHat
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 3:54 am Post subject: 473 |
|
|
| Because wldhrt was fairly active in the game, and we can get some kind of read on her based on the posts. You, on the other hand, are a clean slate. Both your predecessors hardly said anything; that's why I'd like you to go first. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Adele
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 7:04 am Post subject: 474 |
|
|
| TopHat wrote: |
| Because wldhrt was fairly active in the game, and we can get some kind of read on her based on the posts. You, on the other hand, are a clean slate. Both your predecessors hardly said anything; that's why I'd like you to go first. |
/agree.
Full claims, please, including whether you're a gossip, and all choices you've made so far. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Josh-oo-wuh
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Fri Feb 09, 2007 7:18 pm Post subject: 475 |
|
|
I'll glady clarify my entire role. As said before, I was lazarusmoth's mason partner. Also, I am not a gossip.
I equal vanilla townie now.
Who's next? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
IH
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 4:07 am Post subject: 476 |
|
|
Alright, I'm a backup. I can't gossip unless I backup a role that could gossip. I haven't used it yet. Will probably use it tonight. _________________ "Yet to be quoted from Pj"
-Pj |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
TopHat
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 4:12 am Post subject: 477 |
|
|
| IH wrote: |
| Alright, I'm a backup. I can't gossip unless I backup a role that could gossip. I haven't used it yet. Will probably use it tonight. |
I believe I speak for everyone when I say "I don't get this". What does it mean, "unless I backup a role that could gossip"? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tseirp
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sat Feb 10, 2007 4:59 am Post subject: 478 |
|
|
| Yea, IH, what does the whole backup thing mean? I have never heard of a role using a "backup" before, and honestly, I really am not buying it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Adele
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 2:58 am Post subject: 479 |
|
|
| Just in case anyone's wondering, IH managed to author over 50 posts on MafiaScum since the last post in this game. So, he appears to be deliberately avoiding answering a simple question. Should we continue waiting, or move on to wld? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Adele
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Feb 13, 2007 2:59 am Post subject: 480 |
|
|
| ^^^I am of course assuming that the IH here is the same person as the IH there. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|