| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Livingod
Never Dead
|
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 4:26 pm Post subject: 81 |
|
|
Actually, if the theo wagon never began we would have a no lynch. There is already a tie of two votes between Dutters and Moth. _________________ ScumTube!
Endless Mafia. Replacements constantly needed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Quailman
His Postmajesty
|
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 5:03 pm Post subject: 82 |
|
|
| I'm all for lynching lurkers on day 1, but Dutters looked scummy enough to hang instead. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Livingod
Never Dead
|
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 5:18 pm Post subject: 83 |
|
|
Then vote. I reckon that since the mod didn't declare the day over and we didn't reach the lynch requirement, the day still isn't over.
Whoops, I guess you did vote. My question is, and I ask only out of curiosity, what exactly did Dutters do to merit a lynch? Because only two out of ten actually voted for him. _________________ ScumTube!
Endless Mafia. Replacements constantly needed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dutters
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 5:57 pm Post subject: 84 |
|
|
I did unvote but i spelled it wrong, and since your not allowed to edit posts i put it in stars. But to be sure.
Unvote, Vote: Theo _________________ Written on Youtube about Chris Crocker,
"If I or anyone else ever got near your cornhole, we would all die from heart failure and possibly seizures. And that will never happen since you look like a whore who never shaves. For all we know, you have a tail." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MNOWAX
0.999... of a Troll
|
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 6:08 pm Post subject: 85 |
|
|
Thread Closed
It is now twillight!
Theo will be walked to the gallows after a moment from our sponsor! _________________ The Man The Myth The Legend
MNOWAX |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MNOWAX
0.999... of a Troll
|
Posted: Sat Jan 06, 2007 6:34 pm Post subject: 86 |
|
|
End of Day Vote Count:
Theopholis- 3 (Josh-oo-wuh, Livingod, Dutters)
Dutters- 2 (Quailman, Lazarusmoth)
Quailman- 1 (Blake Judge)
Lazarusmoth- 1 (Theopholis)
Livingod- 1 (Pete D)
Josh-oo-wuh- 1 (CrashTextDummie)
Not voting (1): Jadesmar
Most votes to lynch.
| Quote: |
im am placing a deadline on Day one.
Dead line is Saturday January 6th at midnight (EST)
Person with the most votes will be lynched regarless of number. If there is a tie NO LYNCH will be made. |
Theopholis is walked over to the edge of the fifteen foot high stage. Josh-oo-wuh, livingod, and Dutters look at each other, grab a hold of Theo, and throw him off on to a pile of tables and electrical equipment. everybody rushes down to see Matt Hardy lying in the middle of the wreckage. His brother Jeff sreams out "WHY???" but when everyone looks around, no one knows who he is.
Theopholis: Matt Hardy, Mason Is lynched.
It is now Night One Get your Choices in ASAP!!! _________________ The Man The Myth The Legend
MNOWAX |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MNOWAX
0.999... of a Troll
|
Posted: Wed Jan 10, 2007 5:46 pm Post subject: 87 |
|
|
Game will reopen in 24 hours from now. Any change in choice should be done within that time. _________________ The Man The Myth The Legend
MNOWAX |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MNOWAX
0.999... of a Troll
|
Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 5:54 pm Post subject: 88 |
|
|
As all of you have woken up, everyone looks around to see who has not woken up. Crashtextdummie is lying on the ground. He seems that he had his neck broken by a Pedigree. Pete d is also sandwiched between a folded chair and a table, and has barbed wire wrapped around his arm, and a noticable bit of superglue hanging from the wire...
CrashtextDummie, Mick Foley, Cop, was Pedigreed.
Pete D, Undertaker, Seeker, was put through a table with an Arabian Facebuster
With 7 alive it is 4 to lynch. Good luck! _________________ The Man The Myth The Legend
MNOWAX |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Quailman
His Postmajesty
|
Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 6:03 pm Post subject: 89 |
|
|
| Yesterday, CrashTextDummie wrote: |
Good morning, I am replacing someone.
Vote: Josh-oo-wuh
Glad to make everyone's acquaintance.  |
| Later, CrashTextDummie wrote: |
I appreciate the thought, pete, but I'm actually not random voting.
|
Ignoring the rationale that CTD added to avoid telling us that he was a cop, I'll assume he found a scum. He did not change his vote before the deadline, a clear sign that he was onto someone, in case he got offed in the night.
vote: Josh-oo-wuh
...and I'll save Dutters for later. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
CrashTextDummie
Icarian Member
|
Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 7:45 pm Post subject: 90 |
|
|
| Bah, go town! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Livingod
Never Dead
|
Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 9:09 pm Post subject: 91 |
|
|
Hmm, I'm going to have to agree. The best lead we have so far is vote Josh-oo-wuh. _________________ ScumTube!
Endless Mafia. Replacements constantly needed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dutters
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Thu Jan 11, 2007 10:27 pm Post subject: 92 |
|
|
I agree...... FOS Josh-oo-wuh I need more evidence then that. _________________ Written on Youtube about Chris Crocker,
"If I or anyone else ever got near your cornhole, we would all die from heart failure and possibly seizures. And that will never happen since you look like a whore who never shaves. For all we know, you have a tail." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Livingod
Never Dead
|
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 12:05 am Post subject: 93 |
|
|
Whoa, hold up. I forgot to consider one fact: that we're only SEVEN PEOPLE! With a starting number of ten, two scum would be 1/5 of the total pop, while three scum would be just short of 1/3. Worst case scenario is we have three scum among us and we lynch the wrong person again today, i.e. we lose. Then again, this is only the worst case scenario. To even it out, the mod could have made more than one scum faction, or perhaps two mafia and a SK to level their numeric advantage over town, if any. Then again, we could always have one mafia faction and a vig to balance out that numeric advantage of the scum.
I didn't mean to speculate this early, and in fact, I don't encourage further speculation of this just yet. I just state this as food for thought, due to the fact that a wrongful lynch at this point might be an endgame scenario.
Soo, unvote. _________________ ScumTube!
Endless Mafia. Replacements constantly needed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
theopholis
KHAAAAA
|
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 3:32 am Post subject: 94 |
|
|
| Bah! Lose track of things for a week and I get lynched. Oh well. Go town! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Blake Judge
Icarian Member
|
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 5:42 am Post subject: 95 |
|
|
For a start ... heavy FOS: Josh-oo-wuh. As stated, we can't risk lynching him just yet, but he's certainly the most suspicious thus far.
Does anyone know what the 'Seeker' role represents? Couldn't instantly find anything on the MafiaScum wiki, wondering if it would indicate the presence of a cult or somesuch - that'd give us a bit of leeway with this lynch. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Josh-oo-wuh
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:33 am Post subject: 96 |
|
|
I'll make this short and sweet, because, for once, there's a very simple explanation.
I'll tell you exactly what it represents. He was seeking me, Kane. If he found me, we would become masons. However, he did not find me before he died. I assume I'm just a vanilla townie now.
Here's the thing, outside of the first mafia game I ever played online (or in RL for that matter), I NEVER roleclaim. Thing is, since that first game I have never been in this position (very likely to be lynched), thus I've never seen a need to roleclaim. However, I now see that I have to just to stay alive.
I'm Kane, the one Undertaker (pete d) was seeking. I'm town. Don't lynch a townie. Simple as that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Josh-oo-wuh
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 7:53 am Post subject: 97 |
|
|
Crap. Sorry for the double post, but I did forget to address one very important thing: the cop voted to lynch me earlier in the game.
Frankly, I have no solid clue as to why. A couple of possibilities:
1) I could be a miller (shown to be evil on investigation), and as is the case with most millers, I haven't been told.
2) Crashtextdummie never actually investigated me. He posted twice in the thread (not counting the bah post), and both were quoted by Quailman earlier. As Quailman said, in the second post he gave a rationale, but didn't say or imply anything about being a cop (an understandable strategy.) Since Quailman only posted one sentence from that post, here it is in its entirety (I have trouble doing the formal quoting, so this is copy and paste. Double check by reading post #45):
"I appreciate the thought, pete, but I'm actually not random voting.
Josh's no-lynch vote (which really have no business on a Day 1, as he later acknowledged himself), his asking other people where to place his vote, his tunnel vision (picking 3 players before everyone has even checked in) and his strange voting reasons (going after people only because they already have votes) is enough to warrant a vote as serious as they can get this early in the game."
I later addressed these reasons in post #46. Here is the response, once again, in its entirety:
"Again, yes, the original no lynch vote was a mistake. But I'm learning.
And I never outright asked someone to tell me who to vote. Instead, I was asking for arguments for voting for particular people, since I was being called out for jumping on a bandwagon (a move that has recently become ENCOURAGED.) Apparently, it was, once again, a mistake to ask for a reasoned response.
That leads me to the "tunnel vision"/"strange voting reasons" remarks. It became apparent that people wanted to reach a vote and weren't confident that any logical reason for that vote would come along. In fact, I think everyone here is now in agreement that no logical reasoning will be reached. So, in the spirit of moving things along through random voting, I simply stated who had the most votes at that point, meaning they would be easier to lynch, as random as it would be.
I have come to realize that strictly being a relative rookie to mafia in general has become my biggest handicap in this game by far. But please don't confuse things such as ignorance and inexperience for scum tells.
I will continue to go without an official vote until other people have had their say."
So this leads me to what Quailman said in his last post (not in its entirety, but it's just a few posts up on this page):
"He did not change his vote before the deadline, a clear sign that he was onto someone, in case he got offed in the night."
A clear sign? Could it not have been a clear sign that he just hadn't checked the thread? The guy's made 3 posts in this thread, with the third being the bah post. The second post was made on December 29th and the third was on January 11th. That's 13 days in between! So not chnaging his vote was a clear sign? No, no it wasn't.
I'm a LITTLE suspicious of Quailman for voting me, but he could just as easily be a confused townie, given the circumstances. I understand why you guys think I may be mafia, but hopefully you can now see that the reasoning for that is debunked and I'm a townie. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lazarusmoth
Icarian Member
|
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 10:31 am Post subject: 98 |
|
|
| Quote: |
| This game will start on Day 1. There will be no night choices tonight ( due to the amount of people) |
I'm not sure but does this mean that the cop already investigated before we started the game on Day 1? Because if he did, then any rationale that he found scum (i.e. Josh) would be wrong.
Also, Josh's roleclaim makes sense. But then again, I haven't played a Mafia game with Seekers yet.
That said, I unfortunately don't have any leads as to who the guilty parties are. My gut tells me Dutters is one of 'em but I can't back it up. Will be re-reading the thread. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lazarusmoth
Icarian Member
|
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 10:34 am Post subject: 99 |
|
|
The second sentence should read: "Because if he did NOT INVESTIGATE then any rationale that he found scum (i.e. Josh) would be wrong."
Sorry for the double. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Quailman
His Postmajesty
|
Posted: Fri Jan 12, 2007 11:31 am Post subject: 100 |
|
|
bah! He did not have an investigation. unvote: Josh
I'll give it a little thought, but FOS: Dutters for now. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Josh-oo-wuh
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 2:38 am Post subject: 101 |
|
|
| Remind me why Dutters should be a suspect. My brain isn't being very helpful right now, despite re-reading Dutters' posts. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Blake Judge
Icarian Member
|
Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 3:26 pm Post subject: 102 |
|
|
Well, that seems to disprove the theory that CTD investigated Josh before the game started, and a roleclaim of Kane seems likely to be true. Whether he's townie or not is another matter, but I'm inclined to think he probably is if Undertaker was.
In lieu of a better idea, I'm going to vote for the guy that's posted once and never voted - he's either being useless to us or scummy.
Vote: jadesmar |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dutters
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 4:18 pm Post subject: 103 |
|
|
Never voted you say? probably because he can just night kill. Major FOS: Jadesmar _________________ Written on Youtube about Chris Crocker,
"If I or anyone else ever got near your cornhole, we would all die from heart failure and possibly seizures. And that will never happen since you look like a whore who never shaves. For all we know, you have a tail." |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Josh-oo-wuh
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 4:51 am Post subject: 104 |
|
|
| Quailman, I repeat, why are so suspicious of Dutters? Or have we all just agreed to start throwing FoSes around? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Livingod
Never Dead
|
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 5:18 am Post subject: 105 |
|
|
Jadesmar didn't reply to other prods he had either, so I don't think that he's lurking. _________________ ScumTube!
Endless Mafia. Replacements constantly needed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MNOWAX
0.999... of a Troll
|
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 3:55 pm Post subject: 106 |
|
|
I have prodded jadesmar. he hasn't posted in a while.
on a side note, i have no spacebar again, i need to buy a new keyboard. thank god for on-screen keyboard _________________ The Man The Myth The Legend
MNOWAX |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Livingod
Never Dead
|
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 3:59 pm Post subject: 107 |
|
|
J&R on Park Row, they got keyboards for five bucks. IF you'll bother to go there, that is... _________________ ScumTube!
Endless Mafia. Replacements constantly needed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MNOWAX
0.999... of a Troll
|
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 4:12 pm Post subject: 108 |
|
|
That means I'd have to go 250 miles for a five dollar keyboard?
livingod, i live upstate, around syracuse and Rochester.
i have a new aluminium backlit keyboard coming in the mail on monday or tuesday. _________________ The Man The Myth The Legend
MNOWAX |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Livingod
Never Dead
|
Posted: Sun Jan 14, 2007 4:52 pm Post subject: 109 |
|
|
Omg! When I think New York State, I think New York City. When I think New York City, I think New York County. It's intuitive by now.
And people actually live in Rochester and Syracuse? I thought that only college students and farm animals are there. And of course the occasional DMV. Are you the DMV? I'm uhh, having some license, uhh, "problems." Apparently no parking anytime includes me as well...
Anyway, Jadesmar is NOT LURKING! Don't vote to lynch a lurker. Well, if you do, at least don't justify your vote as a lurker vote. _________________ ScumTube!
Endless Mafia. Replacements constantly needed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Josh-oo-wuh
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 12:49 am Post subject: 110 |
|
|
I agree, given the info above. However, that does mean we should be seeking a replacement.
Back on voting, I have no idea. Any thoughts? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lazarusmoth
Icarian Member
|
Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 10:23 am Post subject: 111 |
|
|
vote: jadesmar
Deadwood. Bah. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MNOWAX
0.999... of a Troll
|
Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 5:57 am Post subject: 112 |
|
|
Theo will replace Jadesmar
i am giving him his role, and he will come back in. _________________ The Man The Myth The Legend
MNOWAX |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MNOWAX
0.999... of a Troll
|
Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 6:05 am Post subject: 113 |
|
|
Vote Count:
Theopholis- 2 (lazarusmoth, Blake Judge)
Not voting (5): Theopholis, dutters, Josh-oo-wuh, livingod, Quailman
4 to lynch. _________________ The Man The Myth The Legend
MNOWAX |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Josh-oo-wuh
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 6:36 am Post subject: 114 |
|
|
Well...
Um...
Geez, I got no clue at all. Anyone? Bueller? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lazarusmoth
Icarian Member
|
Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 10:30 am Post subject: 115 |
|
|
How about we do a Top 3 People We Find Scummy List. It may be based on what little facts and gut-feel we have so we don't have to be overly logical.
Mine is:
1. Dutters
2. Quailman
3. Blake Judge
Dutters for the reasons I've kept voting for him in the past (see last posts). Quailman for the false assumption and vote on Josh-oo-wuh. And Blake Judge because of gut-feel. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Josh-oo-wuh
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 7:06 pm Post subject: 116 |
|
|
Well, if I'm going by your list (hell, I got nothing else), seems like the only choice with any real reasoning is Quailman, as the other two seem to be based purely off of gut feel.
Vote: Quailman
Any better ideas? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Blake Judge
Icarian Member
|
Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 8:14 pm Post subject: 117 |
|
|
Well, if we're talking about people that we just ... feel ... are suspicious, this is my list:
1. Quailman
2. Dutters
3. lazarusmoth
Lazarusmoth gets a nod just because I think he's JBL from his posting, who seems like the kind of character that would be scum. I'm going to Unvote regardless, because jadesmar is no longer around an inactive.
Another thing to consider is that when theo died first time, he was a mason. That means there are other masons around who wouldn't have voted for him, Sabu who seems to be a SK/vig, the scum, and non-masons. That's a useful way of looking at the info we have so far. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Josh-oo-wuh
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 8:28 pm Post subject: 118 |
|
|
| True. I'll have another look at things later to see if anything hits me, in light of what you just said. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Livingod
Never Dead
|
Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 9:31 pm Post subject: 119 |
|
|
Hoooooold on a second. The first time around, Theo was a mason, no? Now that he got reinstated, he already knows who the other mason is. It would only be fair if Jadesmar's role (theo's current role) reveals the alignment of the Jeff Hardy character (Matt's mason buddy) because otherwise it would not be fair. The only two roles I can think of that would reveal the Jeff character's alignment are 1: Jeff Hardy himself (Jeff Hardy knows his own alignment) or 2: a scum (scum know that everyone not in their group is against them).
Even though given our current situation (as I've stated before) a lynch could prove fatal at this point, I will nevertheless take my chances and vote Theopholis to spark discussion. And because there's more of a chance that he's scum than that he's Jeff Hardy. _________________ ScumTube!
Endless Mafia. Replacements constantly needed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MNOWAX
0.999... of a Troll
|
Posted: Wed Jan 17, 2007 12:15 am Post subject: 120 |
|
|
That is true. I will reveal who jeff hardy is in the morning. he is nothing other than a mason, just a vanilla townie now, so some people will already konw who he is, or rather who is not Jeff. _________________ The Man The Myth The Legend
MNOWAX |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|