| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Taflinel
|
 Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 7:00 pm Post subject: 81 |
 |
|
Unvote: LoudmouthLee although his vote on MatthewV is not what one could call rational.
| Talitha wrote: |
I'm going to unvote: Antrax but he's in danger of me targetting him tonight with my Zinedine headbutt! 
Why are you watching the amb bandwagon carefully Taflinel?
vote: Taflinel |
I don't know - perhaps because... it's a bandwagon? 
In the meanwhile, can you please explain this?
| Poisonium wrote: |
Unvote; Vote: Talitha
Don't ask. |
(I know he said not to ask, but it's been 15+ replies since then and nobody even mentioned that post.) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Poisonium
annoyed by the old
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 7:32 pm Post subject: 82 |
|
|
Unvote; Vote: Taflinel
I love this bandwagon hopping. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pooky
Methuselah
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 7:33 pm Post subject: 83 |
|
|
Because there's nothing that would motivate a person more than the glory of catching Antrax as scum, he's just that good. 
_________________
3-1 against Mith in Fantasy Football. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Antrax
ESL Student
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 7:40 pm Post subject: 84 |
|
|
I *was* going to sarcast right back at you (and with good cause!) but instead I'll roll with it. What on earth do you think justifies your arrogant "jackpot" post?
_________________
After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pooky
Methuselah
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 8:53 pm Post subject: 85 |
|
|
1st off, You sarcasted first sir with your crypto comment.
2nd, What justifies my "arrogant" comment? I believe you are scum in this game. I'd say it's better justification than what you have for calling me for being focused on "self glorification" based on a meaningless stat that I put into my signature and the one game we've played together before.
_________________
3-1 against Mith in Fantasy Football. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Antrax
ESL Student
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:05 pm Post subject: 86 |
|
|
So, let me get this straight. Your being wrong after reading two posts I made in a game = not arrogant. My being right after being in other games, then demonstrating corrolating evidence = arrogant. Okay.
Oh, for Undercover Monk: it appears that replacing all copies (over all rounds) of S-Boxes in Serpent with any one S-Box does, in fact, result in a weaker cipher, as the cyclic nature of the linear transformation seems to allow for semi-iterative characteristics to emerge.
_________________
After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pooky
Methuselah
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:10 pm Post subject: 87 |
|
|
1. Arrogance has nothing to do with being right or wrong.
2. I never said I wasn't being arrogant.
3. What evidence are you presenting?
_________________
3-1 against Mith in Fantasy Football. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Antrax
ESL Student
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 7:01 am Post subject: 88 |
|
|
Nothing much. Frankly, I was going to vote Macros after just seeing DP's "vote Macros", but then I saw he prefaced it with that reasoning, and it just seemed wrong. However, I don't claim it's much more than that.
_________________
After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Amb
Amb the Hitched.
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 7:57 am Post subject: 89 |
|
|
| Antrax, do us a favour, and just ignore Pooky. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LoudmouthLee
Member of the Year
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 11:55 am Post subject: 90 |
|
|
| Taflinel wrote: |
Unvote: LoudmouthLee although his vote on MatthewV is not what one could call rational.
| Talitha wrote: |
I'm going to unvote: Antrax but he's in danger of me targetting him tonight with my Zinedine headbutt!
Why are you watching the amb bandwagon carefully Taflinel?
vote: Taflinel |
I don't know - perhaps because... it's a bandwagon?
In the meanwhile, can you please explain this?
| Poisonium wrote: |
Unvote; Vote: Talitha
Don't ask. |
(I know he said not to ask, but it's been 15+ replies since then and nobody even mentioned that post.) |
Ah.. the more things change, the more they stay the same.
Taf, last time I checked this is DAY 1. This, of course, means that if you're looking for votes well grounded in evidence, look elsewhere. MattV's post caught my attention, as I have seen many scum use that type of post to "play the fence."
In other words, YOUR blatant overreaction is much more telling than MattV's reaction.
Unvote, Vote: Taf
_________________
-LmL
I'm sorry. I have no desire to talk to you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Taflinel
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 2:53 pm Post subject: 91 |
|
|
| LoudmouthLee wrote: |
Ah.. the more things change, the more they stay the same.
Taf, last time I checked this is DAY 1. This, of course, means that if you're looking for votes well grounded in evidence, look elsewhere. MattV's post caught my attention, as I have seen many scum use that type of post to "play the fence."
In other words, YOUR blatant overreaction is much more telling than MattV's reaction.
Unvote, Vote: Taf |
I wouldn't call it overreaction, I think it's more a sign of curiosity. Surely, calling it 'blatant overreaction' is a blatant overreaction on your part. 
Day 1 or not, my main point is quite simple. Why did nobody even comment on that irrational post? Is that 'bandwagon hopping' intentional or not?
After reading Poisonium's next post, I think it isn't. Vote Poisonium |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Poisonium
annoyed by the old
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 3:23 pm Post subject: 92 |
|
|
The less I know, the less I bother.
Unvote; Vote: Amb |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Poisonium
annoyed by the old
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 3:26 pm Post subject: 93 |
|
|
Oh noes! That's the last time I post before I read the thread. There's an amb wagon! We must totally unvote!
Unvote; Vote: BearTalon |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Antrax
ESL Student
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 3:31 pm Post subject: 94 |
|
|
It's probably some sort of humor that's over my head, but in case it's not, unvote: Dragon Phoenix though I still think he's scum and wish people would help me apply pressure on him, and vote: Poisonium. Even though it's highly unlikely he's trying to really bandwagon-hop onto someone who has no votes, I don't like the "I don't bother" comment, and if it was serious, lynching him is win-win, which is quite good for day 1.
_________________
After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dragon Phoenix
Judge Doom
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 4:05 pm Post subject: 95 |
|
|
I get the feeling Poisonium is forced to post like that by his role. Otherwise it is pretty suicidal.
_________________
My photography:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/artrock2006/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Poisonium
annoyed by the old
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 4:20 pm Post subject: 96 |
|
|
Unvote
I simply didn't get we're past the "random voting phase". I might play suicidal. I always do.
No, I do not have any kind of post restriction. (except for a mental one, but please let's NOT get into a free will discussion) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jesternl
Yankee Doodle Dutchie
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 5:07 pm Post subject: 97 |
|
|
| I've got the feeling that DP is way too eager to defend other players... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Amb
Amb the Hitched.
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 6:40 pm Post subject: 98 |
|
|
Poison is only 13. So his reactions are explainable.
But that said, he has impressed me in some games to date.
I usually agree with LML about day 1 being random etc. But I dont think this has shaped that way. There are several good leads (and one great one in Quailman) in this game so far. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 7:35 pm Post subject: 99 |
|
|
Lets calm down everyone I feel the only ones keeping a level head are me, Amb, Poison, and DP. It's day one and wer'e tearing each other to pieces.
I would like to hear more from Antrax, DP, and Quailman cause those thee have been called out and two of them haven't said much and antrax won't shut up about his argument with Pooky.
Jeeze Amb i never thought I'd find someone to try and lynch before I go after you.  Stop the wrold I want to get off!
_________________
The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dragon Phoenix
Judge Doom
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 7:54 pm Post subject: 100 |
|
|
If there is anything substantial, I will react. Many players are acting like I expect them to (amb, Quailman, Antrax, Pooky). I would rather see some of the silent players post a bit more (Groza and Logain come to mind).
_________________
My photography:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/artrock2006/ |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Poisonium
annoyed by the old
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:26 pm Post subject: 101 |
|
|
| Quote: |
| But that said, he has impressed me in some games to date. |
Which is?
I do have some kind of feeling that DP is scum though... (although my intuition has only shown right once)
Vote: Dragon Phoenix
Partially because that's such an awesome name, otherwise because neither Dragons nor Phoenixes are allowed in France, partially because you are acting very defensive compared to what I've seen so far in other games. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MatthewV
Daedalian Member :_
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 9:26 pm Post subject: 102 |
|
|
The last time groza was almost silent, he was also scum. I think think this needs waiting until day three this time, manatee killer!
unvote amb, vote groza528
(Amb- luckily your name is also easy to type when unvoting  ) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Amb
Amb the Hitched.
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 10:14 pm Post subject: 103 |
|
|
| MV - (to my knowledge) Groza has only played one game in recent times. Its a bit hard to conclude that he must be scum from that one instance. We have better leads than this at the moment. Metagaming is good with regular players, but I no longer have a read on Groza - he has been out of too long. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MatthewV
Daedalian Member :_
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 10:21 pm Post subject: 104 |
|
|
| Yeah (the meta game is more of joke), but he only has one post. The vote is half of a prod. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 10:50 pm Post subject: 105 |
|
|
I just think Antrax is too quck to complain during Day 1. Seems scummy to me. Pooky was obviously trying to annoy him and didn't really think he was scum. Clearly he was overreacting.
_________________
The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pooky
Methuselah
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 12:14 am Post subject: 106 |
|
|
FOS Amb
he knows why.
_________________
3-1 against Mith in Fantasy Football. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Talitha
the Judge!
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 11:45 am Post subject: 107 |
|
|
I want to send my vote in about 5 different directions right now.
But I'll leave it on Taf.
FOS: Logain The only other game I've been in with him, he was scum and voted for me first, then lurked. C'est un case de la deja vu. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Quailman
His Postmajesty
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 4:57 pm Post subject: 108 |
|
|
| Undercover Monk wrote: |
| …I would like to hear more from Antrax, DP, and Quailman cause those thee have been called out and two of them haven't said much… |
I've been called out? By whom? Amb, in response to my vote for him? Are you two scumbuddies? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jesternl
Yankee Doodle Dutchie
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 5:43 pm Post subject: 109 |
|
|
| Antrax' behavior seems about normal for him, as far as I'm concerned. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jesternl
Yankee Doodle Dutchie
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 5:45 pm Post subject: 110 |
|
|
| the previous post was in reply to Undercover Monk by the way |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LoudmouthLee
Member of the Year
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 5:53 pm Post subject: 111 |
|
|
| Quailman wrote: |
| Undercover Monk wrote: |
| …I would like to hear more from Antrax, DP, and Quailman cause those thee have been called out and two of them haven't said much… |
I've been called out? By whom? Amb, in response to my vote for him? Are you two scumbuddies? |
How do you know there are 3 scum in total, heh?
Unvote, Vote: Quailman
This is a slip. Everyone should be voting for Quail now.
_________________
-LmL
I'm sorry. I have no desire to talk to you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
LoudmouthLee
Member of the Year
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 5:55 pm Post subject: 112 |
|
|
PFFT!
Can I learn how to read?
Sorry, Quailman.
Unvote, Re-Vote: Taf
_________________
-LmL
I'm sorry. I have no desire to talk to you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 6:06 pm Post subject: 113 |
|
|
To Quailman
You were called out among others and you hadn't responded. That just seems like you're avoiding qustions which is a scum trait. however I really don't think you're mafia. So i'm officially putting my vote on...
Unvote, Vote: Antrax
_________________
The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MatthewV
Daedalian Member :_
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 9:12 pm Post subject: 114 |
|
|
| With all this voting and revoting, I am pretty confused. I'll stick with groza528's one post being the scummiest thing yet. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Antrax
ESL Student
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2007 10:07 pm Post subject: 115 |
|
|
So let me get this straight. You want to hear more from me, because I won't shut up, which is a problem because the argument that someone else started with me, when he only meant to piss me off, is not contributing anything. Is that your reasoning, Undercover Monk? Then congrats, you win my **** FINGER OF SUSPICION: Undercover Monk ****, usual stupid-or-evil reasoning. However, Poisonium's switch to vote: DP just makes me more sure he's scum, so my vote remains.
_________________
After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pooky
Methuselah
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 2:29 am Post subject: 116 |
|
|
What blatant misrepresentation.
again.
_________________
3-1 against Mith in Fantasy Football. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Middle Aged Guy
Daedalian Member
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 5:54 am Post subject: 117 |
|
|
| I've lost count. Could we have a vote count, s'il-vous-plait? Merci! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Antrax
ESL Student
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 6:54 am Post subject: 118 |
|
|
| Pooky wrote: |
| What blatant misrepresentation. |
| Undercover Monk wrote: |
| I would like to hear more from Antrax, DP, and Quailman...antrax won't shut up about his argument with Pooky. |
| Undercover Monk wrote: |
| But as for the actual game, Antrax seems scmmy to me his initial quip on DP just dosen't seem right. And his argument with pooky served no real purpose. |
(votes Antrax)
| Undercover Monk wrote: |
| I just think Antrax is too quck to complain during Day 1. Seems scummy to me. Pooky was obviously trying to annoy him and didn't really think he was scum. Clearly he was overreacting. |
(then unvotes and revotes me in his next post)
So, misrepresentation?
_________________
After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Pooky
Methuselah
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 10:28 am Post subject: 119 |
|
|
"when he only meant to piss me off"
_________________
3-1 against Mith in Fantasy Football. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2007 6:00 pm Post subject: 120 |
|
|
My Bad I wasn't sure who I had voted and I didn't feel like looking with no vote count. I unvoted in case I had it on someone else. Then I voted for you because your scum.
_________________
The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
