|
|
|
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
MNOWAX
0.999... of a Troll
|
Posted: Sat Sep 20, 2008 4:18 pm Post subject: 81 |
|
|
the clincher is being able to throw away the paired ace if you know you are beat. So many people do not do that,and would rather check call to the end if they think that their opponent might have a better ace. _________________ The Man The Myth The Legend
MNOWAX |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MNOWAX
0.999... of a Troll
|
Posted: Sat Sep 27, 2008 11:40 pm Post subject: 82 |
|
|
ok new hand, new day, lets see what you all think
Full Tilt Poker $1.25 sit and go 90 players, 82 left
Starting stacks 3000, level in this hand is 15/30
My image: I haven't played a hand yet and there has been five hands go by so not much has been shown down anyway.
(3000 chips)I am Dealt (As, Js) in middle position and raise to 150 (deep stack, so i raise a little more than normal) i get three callers including a late position, and both blinds (Pot 600)
Flop is (4s 8c Jh)
The two blinds check and i bet 450 into the pot. The late position calls, and the blind fold. (Pot 1500) At this point the Villain has a little bit more chips than I do, but were practically even.
Turn is ( 7s )
This is where it gets a little weird. I check, with the intent to check-raise when he bets 90. I am super scared right here, as it screams that he has something big and just screams "call me". I think he has a straight here, maybe he hit a set, or he just may be an idiot, but I have outs to the nuts, so I just call, afraid of having to stack off on a draw if i raise.(Pot: 1680)
River: ( 8s )
Ok, I have hit my nut flush, but the board paired. great. Now what? I bet 800. He surely would not believe that I chased down a runner runner flush, right?He stacks off,(pot 3280 factoring in the call but not the raise,and its the rest of my 1600 to call ), thinking I have a good shot that i have the best hand. However there are a couple of hand that can beat me.
I have two questions: Number One, what do you think he ended up having? Secondly, What could i have done to .have changed the situation? Lastly, Should I call the all in? _________________ The Man The Myth The Legend
MNOWAX |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antrax
ESL Student
|
Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 4:51 am Post subject: 83 |
|
|
Did anyone call until you? Why did you raise?
Before the flop, what did you put the later positions on?
After the flop, what did you thihk you were against?
Why bet 450? What were you hoping to accomplish?
Why would a late position bet 90 into a 1500 pot?
As for your own questions: easy call. He sounds like an idiot (bet 90 into a 1500 is meaningless, every hand in poker has pot odds there), I would put him on overpair (QQ/KK). Worst case he had a set all along and now he hit a full house, which is something you could have tried to probe at on the turn.
I would have played your hand very differently, so it's hard to say what you should have done "differently". _________________ After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MNOWAX
0.999... of a Troll
|
Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 4:57 pm Post subject: 84 |
|
|
Did anyone call until you? No Why did you raise? I was just pot building. AJ suited is normally in my raising range in that position.
Before the flop, what did you put the later positions on? I put the blinds on anything. The late position caller id see with any pocket pair or suited connectors possibly. I think his preflop range was quite wide due to the deep stacks, and a little loose play. However I have not seen a showdown yet, so it could just be faulty perception
After the flop, what did you think you were against? I figured then he called the 450 that he had either drawing to the straight, had top pair, or trying to slowplay a set.
Why bet 450? What were you hoping to accomplish?I bet 3/4s of the pot to just take it down right there. I was a little surprised when he called actually, because it shortened his range considerably
Why would a late position bet 90 into a 1500 pot?Hell if I know, it just screamed raise me. I am pretty sure it wasn't a mis click, because the blinds were at 15-30, and he had to have at least moved the slider twice.
as for your analysis. i did not want to raise him on the turn, as if he had a set, he definitely would have moved in on me, and i would had to face a decision of trying to catch my flush for all of my chips. _________________ The Man The Myth The Legend
MNOWAX |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antrax
ESL Student
|
Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 5:48 pm Post subject: 85 |
|
|
You bet 5 times the big blind to build a pot? How many players did you expect to call? What do you do if you flop an ace?
You think people call 4xBB with anything? Cold-call 5xBB with suited connectors? Call 450 in a 1050 pot with a straight draw?
I think we play the game very differently. _________________ After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MNOWAX
0.999... of a Troll
|
Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 7:32 pm Post subject: 86 |
|
|
firstly, in comparison to the stack size, 5 times the big blind here got quite the action i was looking for: 2- 3 callers. this is low stakes stuff with big stacks. I am not saying these people are good players, or even decent players. I am just using tactics that work on these people. I would have made the same continuation bet of 450 if i had flopped the ace, and are you telling me that you are not going to call 450 in a 1050 pot with an open ended straight draw? You're getting two to one on your money, and you're about a 2 to 1 dog. While they are not the best odds, they are good enough to warrant a call in that situation.
FYI: The idiot had Jc7c and had made two pair on the turn. The river actually would have helped me win this hand without the flush when it counterfeited his two pair anyway.- _________________ The Man The Myth The Legend
MNOWAX |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot
|
Posted: Sun Sep 28, 2008 8:03 pm Post subject: 87 |
|
|
| I call, but I wouldn't be surprised to find I'm behind a boat. However, in these $1.25 many-player tournaments, the last thing I want to do is try to come back from being short-stacked. I want to double up or quit this tournament and go play something else. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antrax
ESL Student
|
Posted: Mon Sep 29, 2008 5:08 am Post subject: 88 |
|
|
| MNOWAX wrote: |
| are you telling me that you are not going to call 450 in a 1050 pot with an open ended straight draw? You're getting two to one on your money, and you're about a 2 to 1 dog. While they are not the best odds, they are good enough to warrant a call in that situation. |
The odds aren't 2 to 1. They are 2 to 1 ONLY if I believe the bettor is going to check to me on the turn. Otherwise, I'm getting 2:1 pot odds on the next card only. It's called "effective odds", and it's important to keep it in mind when drawing. They are often offset by "implied odds", which is an estimate of how much I can get paid off if I do hit my draw.
I thought about it yesterday, and my previous reply wasn't very helpful. I'll type my thoughts instead of just criticising yours.
AJs isn't a very good hand heads up. If you hit the J and the board has no Q/K, you're good. Otherwise, you're fucked. If you hit the ace, especially if you raised before the flop, you might be up against a better kicker and it's difficult to figure out.
Raising preflop is rarely a move for value - you rarely have a made hand preflop. So, it's done to cut down the number of people in the pot. So, it doesn't make a lot of sense to do it with AJs, which is a drawing hand - you hope to hit a nut flush and get paid by someone. The more people in the pot, the more "someone"s. So, I disagree with the initial raise.
At this point I'd also like to point out that "deep stack poker" is used in ring games. When you're playing a tournament, your main consideration is not to go bust. You're looking for cheap shots at doubling up when you're a chip-leader early-on, but you'll only bet big later on, when the blinds become worth the trouble. Against decent players, only good hands will call 5xBB with blinds so low, and your hand wasn't good.
A bit bet on the flop is correct. You have the best hand, most likely, and you want to take it down before that turns around. I would have bet 600 here.
His 90 on the turn makes no sense, and thus you need to ignore it and do what's right. What happened on the turn is that you improved (hitting some extra % for a flush draw) and he probably hasn't (if he has 56, that means he called a pot-sized bet on the flop with an inside straight, so his money is yours anyway, it's just a matter of time), so you need to pummel him to take it down before something bad rivers.
On the river you have a nut flush, if he hasn't pushed in the turn he probably doesn't have a set, so you can go in safely.
That's how I would play this hand, basically. _________________ After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot
|
Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 3:01 pm Post subject: 89 |
|
|
Hi all. WRGPT18 -- World Rec.Gambling.Poker Tournament #18 -- has just started. This is an email-based poker tournament modeled after WSOP main event. It takes most of the year and the only thing you win is bragging rights, but it is fun. I've been in every one since WRGPT5, and I finished fifth in WRGPT7.
| aside wrote: |
Sadly, the records for that year are not posted, but I really did! In fact, when we were down to 8 people, I was in a hand with the eventual winner, Ming Lee, where I had A9 and Ming had, I'm pretty sure, AK or AQ, the flop was A 9 3. We were headed for a big hand when the server went nuts. The response to my pot-sized bet was that the board was now As As As, giving me quad aces of spades. The hand was never recovered and we had to start it over. I'm still a little bitter.  |
Anyway, you can register here: http://www.wrgpt.org Registration is open until Oct 31, it is free, and all you need is an email address. Unfortunately, I didn't think to post here soon enough to get you into the practice round, but you still have plenty of time to get into the real game.
I'm registered under my real name: Steve Zagieboylo. It would be fun if some of us were to find ourselves at the same table, though it is unlikely. Typically more than 1000 people play in this tournament. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MNOWAX
0.999... of a Troll
|
Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 3:59 pm Post subject: 90 |
|
|
im so /in _________________ The Man The Myth The Legend
MNOWAX |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MNOWAX
0.999... of a Troll
|
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 6:23 pm Post subject: 91 |
|
|
new year new poker shot.
Turning stone 50 live tournament early stages:
you get 10K in chips, and blinds move up every fifteen minutes
My Image: TAG
Villian's Image: loose passive.
I started the hand with 12,000 in chips and the blinds are currently 150-300 with a 25 ante. Two limpers to me who is in the BB with KsJc i raise to 900 that the first villian calls and the other folds. The flop.is (4sKc8h) (Pot 2350)
i bet 1500 in to the pot, and he calls. Turn is the (Kh) (pot 5350)
I check, intent on check-raising, and he checks behind River is the (3d)
I check again, and he shoves for 6000. Whats your play? _________________ The Man The Myth The Legend
MNOWAX |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MNOWAX
0.999... of a Troll
|
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 6:29 pm Post subject: 92 |
|
|
What actually happened - I couldn't get away from the feeling that i was beat by a king that just filled up or just a better King in general. While it wouldn't cost me all of my chips, if i called and lost i would have less than 3K. The river check may have been quite a bad move, i think i should have bet there.I guess my thinking was that i was beat and was hoping for a check down, rather than a check raise this time. It wouldn't have mattered anyway in this hand. I called the 6K and was shown pocket 8s for a flopped set and a boat on the turn. I don't believe i played this hand well, i think i should have led the turn and river, and while the outcome would have been the same, i think it was still bad poker.. - _________________ The Man The Myth The Legend
MNOWAX |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot
|
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 10:12 pm Post subject: 93 |
|
|
I haven't looked yet, but I hate the checks.
He is loose, so he'll call you with worse hands. And he is passive, so he isn't going to bet out for you to make your check-raise unless he has a hand he was going to call with anyway (possibly one that beats you). On the turn, you can see that one more bet makes him just about pot committed, so there is no point in making a check-raise. You can raise on the turn and get all in on the river if that's your goal.
On the river, you check again, which really looks like weakness. This is a great play against a loose aggressive player, who is likely to make a bluff at you. From a passive player you don't expect a bluff, but maybe your double broken-wing has inspired him. Leaving you, of course, in this situation where you don't know what to do.
So, now, what to do (on the river, after he has pushed) depends on where you are in the tournament and what your goals are. You are clearly not yet pot committed -- if you fold you still have 9500 or so, which is 30 big blinds. Not exactly where you'd like to be, but not desperate yet. If you call and lose, you have a touch over 10 big blinds, which is pretty close to desperation time.
You've gone out of your way to induce a bluff from this passive player, and he has bet out. Does that mean that you succeeded, or that he just filled up? Damn, I hate this situation.
When I don't know, I usually fall back on my policy that I want to bet off my chips, not call them off. If I can't get any read on him, I think I lay this down. But I think that far more likely I would have bet about 3k on the river. If he comes over the top, I feel a little better about laying it down, and I'm left with 20 BBs, which is at least a little play.
------------------ Looking at your followup, now.
Ugh. At least it wasn't 33 in his hand, and he filled up on the river. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot
|
Posted: Thu Jan 29, 2009 10:25 pm Post subject: 94 |
|
|
Oh yeah, I forgot to say that I hate the preflop raise, too. Just check and take your free flop. With a loose passive player who has already called the blind, two more BBs isn't going to chase him off. And KJ is never a hand you want to go to war with for all your chips. KQ and AJ are both easily in his range of hands, so you could even catch top pair and not know what to do.
Consider how much stronger just KQ is, here. If one of the limpers has this dominated (AK, AQ) they probably would have raised. There aren't a lot of limping hands that hold KQ over the coals as there are with KJ.
Also, taking a free flop in BB, you can bet out on baby flops and you'll usually take them. Since a baby flop has probably missed them, they won't feel inclined to defend it, and they will be more than prepared to believe you caught something, since you played for free. This is more common than taking this pot with the pre-flop raise. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antrax
ESL Student
|
Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:13 am Post subject: 95 |
|
|
Ditto to Zag's second post.
Also, no offense intended, but I think you may be giving too much weight to unimportant things. It's odd, to me, that when you tell about the hand you include "my image" but you don't say what seat the limpers were in. Late position limper might have shit, but early position limper could easily dominate you.
And how exactly do you know how others perceive you? It's tempting to think that everybody else noticed what we wanted them to notice, especially if they realise our awesome playing skillz, and it's way cool to do things based on "what does he think that I think that he thinks?" but I really think you a) might not always realise how others perceive you, through no fault of yours and b) that it should take a back seat compared to other things, like knowing to choose your battles - KJs out of position with blinds that are less than 5% your stack might not be the time and place to start hitting hard. After your preflop raise and his call, when the K flops, you have no reason to assume you're not against a better king. _________________ After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MNOWAX
0.999... of a Troll
|
Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2009 6:05 pm Post subject: 96 |
|
|
| Antrax wrote: |
Ditto to Zag's second post.
Also, no offense intended, but I think you may be giving too much weight to unimportant things. It's odd, to me, that when you tell about the hand you include "my image" but you don't say what seat the limpers were in. Late position limper might have shit, but early position limper could easily dominate you. |
i forgot to say that the first limper was middle position( four seats away) and the other limper who folded was in the small blind.
| Quote: |
| And how exactly do you know how others perceive you? It's tempting to think that everybody else noticed what we wanted them to notice, especially if they realise our awesome playing skillz, and it's way cool to do things based on "what does he think that I think that he thinks?" but I really think you a) might not always realise how others perceive you, through no fault of yours and b) that it should take a back seat compared to other things, like knowing to choose your battles - KJs out of position with blinds that are less than 5% your stack might not be the time and place to start hitting hard. After your preflop raise and his call, when the K flops, you have no reason to assume you're not against a better king. |
When i Talk about my image, It is only to show you guys how i play normally. In general (not talking about this hand) While things would make sense if i play insanely aggressive, versus a tighter game, no one here would really know that for sure. This isn't a WPT final table. it early in a 50 dollar tournament at a local casino. A lot of these things just wont come into play. I understand that. As for KJ yeah i acknowledge it wasn't the greatest play from the get go. I also say in my second post that i was afraid that i could have easily been beaten by a better King which is why i slowed down on the river.
@Zag - I think that was my main problem here was the hand selection. i got into a hand i shouldn't have been in and could have easily been dominated, while i want sure if i should be playing for stacks. This was compunded by my poor turn and river play. I think i could have let it go, but I wasn't sure where i was in the hand, so in the end i screwed myself. its always a new learning experience for me, always something new. _________________ The Man The Myth The Legend
MNOWAX |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot
|
Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2009 6:28 pm Post subject: 97 |
|
|
I had noticed that Antrax's post sounded a bit harsh, then I reread mine and it sounded just as harsh. Sorry, I didn't mean to be. I hope I was at least informative.
I hope this makes up for it.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AZu
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2009 7:31 pm Post subject: 98 |
|
|
Aren't you the guy who badgers people for posting chestnuts?
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MNOWAX
0.999... of a Troll
|
Posted: Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:07 pm Post subject: 99 |
|
|
all i am doing is trying to improve my game. information is all i desire. _________________ The Man The Myth The Legend
MNOWAX |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot
|
Posted: Thu May 28, 2009 2:57 pm Post subject: 100 |
|
|
I was playing some Omaha Hi pot limit last night. I had a couple of amusing hands. I was playing on 3 tables and reading GL at the same time, so I wasn't paying a ton of attention. I mostly just peddle the nuts on this game, so it doesn't require a ton of analysis. These hands are just for amusement factor.
Kh Ks 4s 4c
Player before me is the perfect weak-loose player. Also, he seems pretty clueless about Omaha, and is probably taking a vacation from Hold'em (where he gets beat up for marrying his big pairs). Anyway, after a couple of limpers he raises to 4 BBs. I smell an AA hand, since it's the first preflop raise I've seen him make. I call, counting on the fact that I can get him all in if I hit a set.
The flop came up and I glanced at it, distracted by another hand I was in. I was immediately disappointed to see a lack of kings. However, when betting came to me and the probable AA before had predictably bet, I looked at it more carefully to realize that it was
Flop: 4h 6h 4d
No set of kings, but quad fours will do quite nicely. I just called and TWO additional players behind me called, also.
Turn: 4h 6h 4d Jh
My buddy bets again, again I just call, and one caller behind.
River: 4h 6h 4d Jh 7s
My buddy bets one more time, I make raise that is only twice minimum, thinking that, even if I drop the one behind me, I will probably get a call from my friend, and I certainly want to give him a chance to raise if he thinks he has something. Player behind me RAISES! Woot! My pal RERAISES all in. You just don't find opponents like these every day. I call (it's already enough to put the player behind me all in, too.) and they show AA with the nut flush on my right, and JJ for the best full house on my left. I love these guys.
So, this was 25c / 50c pot limit. For my preflop investment of $2 I pulled in a pot of $105, for $65 profit. Yeah, I think I had the right implied odds.
-----------------
I have 3h 5h 6s 8s in the SB, and there are several limpers, so I complete my bet. Flop is 2h 4c 7s. I'm busy trying to figure out if I have a straight already, or how many outs I have to a straight, while dealing with other hands that keep popping up. I don't have it, but I think I'm still a favorite over almost anything so I make a pot-sized bet and get two callers. (Quick: how many outs do I have to the nuts? Answer: 16 -- 4 aces, 3 each of 3's, 5's, 6's, 8's.). The turn is the As, giving me the nuts and a bad flush draw. I bet, one caller drops and another puts me all in. The river is a 5d, counterfeiting his wheel (which only would have chopped with me, anyway) and giving me the whole pot.
The lesson here is that the nut straight is not so great in Omaha unless you have redraws. Let me note that he did not have spades, so those were all redraws for me, also. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot
|
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 4:12 pm Post subject: 101 |
|
|
A nice result for me. What did I have?
| Code: |
! Table b4, Hand 40, Day 51
! Monguer folds
+-+----------------------------+--------+--------+------+----+--------+
|#| Name |Bankroll| Action |Status|Pot#|Pot Size|
+-+----------------------------+--------+--------+------+----+--------+
1|> Monguer | 41150 | 5700 |folded| | |
2| Larry Gudgate | 24125 | 50 |folded| | |
3| SmBoatDrinks | 19825 | 50 |folded| | |
4| Next Time | 33050 | 50 |folded| | |
5| Sally James | 51600 | 50 |folded| | |
6| Boomerman | 45200 | 50 |folded| | |
7| Isaac Newton | 79825 | 450 |folded| | |
8| buGGzilla | 19350 | 50 |folded| | |
9|D Don Todd | 13775 | 50 |folded| | |
10| Steve Zagieboylo | 0 | 26950 |all-in| | |
+-+----------------------------+--------+--------+------+----+--------+
! History of this hand:
! 01/01/12 13:23:58! Dealing a new hand
! 01/01/12 13:23:58! Everyone antes $50
! 01/01/12 13:23:58! Steve Zagieboylo blinds $200
! 01/01/12 13:23:58! Monguer blinds $400
! 01/01/12 13:23:58! Larry Gudgate is on vacation and folds
! 01/02/12 04:54:39! SmBoatDrinks folds
! 01/02/12 04:54:39! Next Time folds
! 01/02/12 06:14:38! Sally James folds
! 01/02/12 06:14:38! Boomerman folds
! 01/02/12 06:14:38! Isaac Newton calls
! 01/02/12 07:45:28! buGGzilla folds
! 01/02/12 16:20:12! Don Todd folds
_____________________________________________________________________________
! I hated folding that last hand. With KQ suited, it was easily
! the best hand I've seen since the very first hand of the tournament.
! But it was still not enough to call a reraise with the original raiser
! still behind me. Monguer, tell me you had aces or kings.
! -- Steve Zagieboylo --
_____________________________________________________________________________
! 01/02/12 16:20:12! Steve Zagieboylo calls
_____________________________________________________________________________
! I had 99. Monguer
! -- Monguer --
_____________________________________________________________________________
! 01/02/12 16:44:13! Monguer checks
! 01/02/12 16:44:13! Pot right ($1700), flopping/dealing/drawing cards
! 01/02/12 16:44:13! 3 players
! 01/02/12 16:44:13! Flopped cards: 9c 9s 8c
_____________________________________________________________________________
! So it would have been a coin flip. 99 beats me soundly on this flop,
! though. :-D
! -- Steve Zagieboylo --
_____________________________________________________________________________
! 01/02/12 17:04:34! Steve Zagieboylo bets $1500
! 01/02/12 17:05:57! Monguer calls
! 01/02/12 17:46:57! Isaac Newton folds
! 01/02/12 17:46:57! Pot right ($4700), flopping/dealing/drawing cards
! 01/02/12 17:46:57! 2 players
! 01/02/12 17:46:57! Flopped card: 9h
! 01/02/12 18:40:41! Steve Zagieboylo checks
! 01/02/12 19:13:50! Monguer bets $3750
! 01/02/12 20:32:07! Steve Zagieboylo raises $21250 and is all in
! 01/03/12 00:19:10! Larry Gudgate is back from vacation
! 01/03/12 03:50:18! Monguer folds
! Hand over, no showdown
! Current board is: 9c 9s 8c 9h ?
! Steve Zagieboylo wins $33450 (net $6500)
+-+----------------------------+--------+--------+------+----+--------+
|#| Name |Bankroll| Action |Status|Pot#|Pot Size|
+-+----------------------------+--------+--------+------+----+--------+
1|> Monguer | 41150 | | | | |
2| Larry Gudgate | 24125 | | | | |
3| SmBoatDrinks | 19825 | | | | |
4| Next Time | 33050 | | | | |
5| Sally James | 51600 | | | | |
6| Boomerman | 45200 | | | | |
7| Isaac Newton | 79825 | | | | |
8| buGGzilla | 19350 | | | | |
9| Don Todd | 13775 | | | | |
10|D Steve Zagieboylo | 33450 | | | | |
+-+----------------------------+--------+--------+------+----+--------+
! 638 players left in the tournament, 0 tables down to six players
! A new hand will be dealt shortly
This table's current status can be found at http://hands.wrgpt.org/b/b4.html
TOURNEY INFORMATION
NOTICE:
There will be no more live redraws for the "b" round.
When a table gets below six players all tables will finish
the current hand and a full redraw will occur.
Having problems? Send email to floorman21@wrgpt.org.
Live Redraw Status as of 01/03/12 03:25:01 AM
Total Empty Seats: 32
Total Playing Seats: 638
No Live redraw in progress.
Helpful commands: - WHAT for status
Basic advance actions:
BET $x | CALL $x | CALL * | FOLD | MAKE $x
RAISE $x | POT | CHECK | JAM | UNDO | GONE
quick guide: http://www.wrgpt.org and click on Quick Advance Actions.
Or view the manual at http://www.wrgpt.org/manual.html
Also on Facebook: http://facebook.com/wrgpt
Your automated Holdem dealer
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MNOWAX
0.999... of a Troll
|
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 4:50 pm Post subject: 102 |
|
|
ok just to get thepoker itself down:
Hero SB:26950
Villian 1:BB: 41150
Villian 2 HI: 79825
V2, and Hero limp, Vi1 checks:
FLOP: 9c 9s 8c (pot $1700)
Hero Bets $1500
V1 Calls, V2 Folds
TURN: 9c 9s 8c 9h (pot: $4700)
Hero Checks, V1 Bets $3750
Hero Raises All-in to $21250 V1 Folds. _________________ The Man The Myth The Legend
MNOWAX |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MNOWAX
0.999... of a Troll
|
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:13 pm Post subject: 103 |
|
|
The problem is that you could have limped with a lot of hands in the SB. the rest is spoiler-ed for your pleasure.
Flop play makes a perfect Donk bet with a 9, as well as a big overpair. However, my feeling from the conversation is that you were planning to get raised PF when you limped, that removes most hands outside of the unlikely A9s
My likely guess is that you were looking to get raised PF so you likely had AA or KK here, with QQ being less likely but possible.
the way you played the turn makes it even more unlikely you have a 9, because frankly with a 9 you missed value by CRAI, because the way V1 sized the turn bet, he was likely planning to shove on the river.
so my guess is you had KK, or complete air, and were planning to take this pot away from him no matter what the flop.
_________________ The Man The Myth The Legend
MNOWAX |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot
|
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 5:40 pm Post subject: 104 |
|
|
I wasn't expecting to be raised preflop, though it was a distinct possibility. The previous hand (when I was BB and he was UTG) He had raised, an over-aggressive player reraised, and I folded my Kh Qh, worried too much that I'm dominated, out of position, and don't even have significant implied odds anymore because the call would be 1/5 my stack. He did reraise all in and took it down preflop. But he was not over-aggressive, so I did not expect a raise from him preflop without an excellent hand, which is always unlikely.
I had air, for my check-raise bluff
---------
(Assuming I did have a 9, for this whole paragraph:)
By the way, I disagree that betting out on this flop with a 9 is a mistake. It would be my move something like 75% of the time. I also would never go for a check-raise on the river; the vast bulk of his likely hands with which he will still put money into the pot on the river, he would call a bet but be glad to check behind and see a showdown. If I had check-called the turn, then check-raised the river, the raise wouldn't be enough to justify the potential of losing a call. If we were deep enough that it would matter, then there are too few hands that he would call the check-raise with. (That is, if he bets the river after I check-call, it is either a bluff or a powerhouse that was headed all-in no matter what I did. I'd have to be pretty confidant of a bluff in order to make up for all the missed opportunities from check-behind when he would have called. Since he called my bet on the flop, a bluff is extremely unlikely.) I could see check-call the turn and bet out on the river, but not try for a check-raise. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MNOWAX
0.999... of a Troll
|
Posted: Tue Jan 03, 2012 6:22 pm Post subject: 105 |
|
|
| Zag wrote: |
I wasn't expecting to be raised preflop, though it was a distinct possibility. The previous hand (when I was BB and he was UTG) He had raised, an over-aggressive player reraised, and I folded my Kh Qh, worried too much that I'm dominated, out of position, and don't even have significant implied odds anymore because the call would be 1/5 my stack. He did reraise all in and took it down preflop. But he was not over-aggressive, so I did not expect a raise from him preflop without an excellent hand, which is always unlikely.
I had air, for my check-raise bluff
---------
(Assuming I did have a 9, for this whole paragraph:)
By the way, I disagree that betting out on this flop with a 9 is a mistake. It would be my move something like 75% of the time. I also would never go for a check-raise on the river; the vast bulk of his likely hands with which he will still put money into the pot on the river, he would call a bet but be glad to check behind and see a showdown. If I had check-called the turn, then check-raised the river, the raise wouldn't be enough to justify the potential of losing a call. If we were deep enough that it would matter, then there are too few hands that he would call the check-raise with. (That is, if he bets the river after I check-call, it is either a bluff or a powerhouse that was headed all-in no matter what I did. I'd have to be pretty confidant of a bluff in order to make up for all the missed opportunities from check-behind when he would have called. Since he called my bet on the flop, a bluff is extremely unlikely.) I could see check-call the turn and bet out on the river, but not try for a check-raise. |
I agree that betting the nine on that flop is good like i said before its a good donk bet play. My comment was in regards to the turn C/R. My comment that it was unlikely you had a nine was not due to the flop action, but rather the preflop action and the turn action didn't go with the story on the flop. _________________ The Man The Myth The Legend
MNOWAX |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antrax
ESL Student
|
Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 6:41 am Post subject: 106 |
|
|
What you had is the knowledge the other guy has position but no cards. Not having the 9, and not being an idiot, I would put you on an 8 (don't expect you to limp here with a pocket pair over 8). Since you limped your hand is one that can make a large hand, so it can be anything from a pair of 8s to A8s to J8o, depending on your style.
I'll now go and check the spoilers.
[edit (spoilered)]
Are you sure this was a good spot to bluff in? He'd have called you with an 8 and raised with probably any pair or even trash like T7 (BB surprise!) _________________ After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MNOWAX
0.999... of a Troll
|
Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 5:01 pm Post subject: 107 |
|
|
I think thatIIt would have bee a perfect line for an overpair, which is why i guessed that. The flop bet makes it look like i've got trash, so it as kinda like a double fake out there. There's always a chance you have got air there, and you could have been trying to scare away low boats with your CR but it also means hands like 8's and higher under pairs (55-66-77) will liekly call you.
Did it work this time? yeah, but I don't think it was the best move in that spot, because his range of calling a shove in that spot is too large. My feeling is that V1 was on the bottom end of his range and had two big cards, and was trying to take away the pot on the river with a shove, whether he hit or not. What do you do if he checked the turn? _________________ The Man The Myth The Legend
MNOWAX |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot
|
Posted: Wed Jan 04, 2012 7:16 pm Post subject: 108 |
|
|
Now way would I have limped preflop with TT or a higher pair, at least not in the small blind with only one limper so far.
With TT or JJ and at least 3 limpers already in, I might, but not with only one. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antrax
ESL Student
|
Posted: Thu Jan 05, 2012 5:25 am Post subject: 109 |
|
|
| Zag wrote: |
Now way would I have limped preflop with TT or a higher pair, at least not in the small blind with only one limper so far.
With TT or JJ and at least 3 limpers already in, I might, but not with only one. |
Yup. As I said, I take you for a good player  _________________ After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot
|
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 9:36 pm Post subject: 110 |
|
|
Who is playing WRGPT this year?
Here's a quiz. What am I holding? If you were John Pearce, with K 3, do you make this call here? Background: This is only the third hand of the tournament, and I have folded preflop on both hands previously without putting any money in. Note, though, that I see a free flop on this hand.
P.S. No fair looking up the hand on the WRGPT site.
! Table b11, Hand 3, Day 6
| Code: |
+-+----------------------------+--------+--------+------+----+--------+
|#| Name |Bankroll| Action |Status|Pot#|Pot Size|
+-+----------------------------+--------+--------+------+----+--------+
1| erich | 29900 | 100 |folded| | |
2| Garnett21k | 24950 | 100 |folded| | |
3|D lnmezz | 29850 | 0 |folded| | |
4| Doc W | 29800 | 100 |folded| | |
5| Steve Zagieboylo | 0 | 30000 |all-in| 1 | 450 |
6| zerosum | 30000 | 0 |folded| | |
7| The Wise One | 35600 | 500 |folded| | |
8| CRStals | 29900 | 0 |folded| | |
9| clubnando | 29650 | 0 |folded| | |
10|> John Pearce | 0 | 29550 |all-in| 2 | 59900 |
+-+----------------------------+--------+--------+------+----+--------+ |
! History of this hand:
! 10/25/12 17:45:21! Dealing a new hand
! 10/25/12 17:45:21! No ante
! 10/25/12 17:45:21! Doc W blinds $50
! 10/25/12 17:45:21! Steve Zagieboylo blinds $100
! 10/25/12 19:25:40! CRStals is back from vacation
! 10/25/12 19:56:57! zerosum folds
! 10/25/12 20:21:35! The Wise One calls
! 10/25/12 20:21:35! CRStals folds
! 10/25/12 20:21:35! clubnando folds
! 10/25/12 23:27:43! John Pearce calls
! 10/26/12 03:47:24! erich calls
! 10/26/12 07:03:44! Garnett21k calls
! 10/26/12 07:03:44! lnmezz folds
! 10/26/12 09:21:53! Doc W calls
! 10/26/12 09:21:53! Steve Zagieboylo checks
! 10/26/12 09:21:53! Pot right ($600), flopping/dealing/drawing cards
! 10/26/12 09:21:53! 6 players
! 10/26/12 09:21:53! Flopped cards: 3d 3s 5d
! 10/26/12 13:02:51! Doc W checks
! 10/26/12 13:21:44! Steve Zagieboylo bets $400
! 10/26/12 13:53:50! The Wise One calls
! 10/26/12 14:15:14! John Pearce raises $1600
! 10/26/12 19:15:01! erich folds
! 10/26/12 20:49:19! Garnett21k folds
! 10/26/12 22:48:11! Doc W folds
! 10/26/12 22:48:11! Steve Zagieboylo calls
! 10/27/12 05:52:38! The Wise One folds
! 10/27/12 05:52:38! Pot right ($5000), flopping/dealing/drawing cards
! 10/27/12 05:52:38! 2 players
! 10/27/12 05:52:38! Flopped card: 7s
! 10/27/12 07:28:14! Steve Zagieboylo bets $3000
! 10/27/12 08:48:51! John Pearce raises $3000
! 10/27/12 10:34:03! Steve Zagieboylo raises $21900 and is all in |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
novice
No harm. Pun intended!
|
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 9:54 pm Post subject: 111 |
|
|
| I haven't done the math but my instinct is to call with K3. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Trojan Horse
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 11:36 pm Post subject: 112 |
|
|
| I call, then I open my Start menu and prepare to click "Shut Down". |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot
|
Posted: Sat Oct 27, 2012 11:55 pm Post subject: 113 |
|
|
This is more about a read than about math. If you're not already ahead, then clearly the math is against you: If you're behind, then you have only 3 outs at best, and possibly only one out. What do you put me on?
Or, if you're determined to take a mathematical approach, what are all the conceivable hands I could have played this way, with a percentage for each for the chance this is how I would have played it. Then do a Baysian analysis of whether I have one of the N hands that beat you version the M hands that don't.
Or just start by listing the N hands that beat you. That's a good place to start. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MNOWAX
0.999... of a Troll
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2012 12:31 am Post subject: 114 |
|
|
So you leave a poker problem? And I'm in the mood to analyze the hell out of this.
Early thoughts, He's a fool to not be calling here, simply because there are so many different combos in your range that he can beat when you are in the BB.
From a pure math prospective: K3 Vs a totally open range:
| Code: |
45,540 games 0.031 secs 1,469,032 games/sec
Board: 3d 3s 5d 7s
Dead:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 90.366% 89.97% 00.39% 40974 178.50 { Kd3c }
Hand 1: 09.634% 09.24% 00.39% 4209 178.50 { random } |
John Pearce is 90.4% against all random hands, Pot odds covering the call are 1.77 to 1 ( for 18900 to call in a 38900 pot If i understood it correctly and didn't fuck up my math) so its a snap call and hope he has diamonds, a weaker 3, or a middle pair that didn't flop a set.
From a reads perspective, It's still a snap call, because there are a ton of hands that you'd react that way to and still he can beat. ---
If we take out the top stuff that would normally raise with ( and this is a super tight image of you Zag, so Forgive me now)
| Code: |
Board: 3d 3s 5d 7s
Dead:
equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 89.896% 89.48% 00.42% 38189 178.50 { Kd3c }
Hand 1: 10.104% 09.69% 00.42% 4134 178.50 { TT-22, ATs-A2s, K2s+, Q2s+, J2s+, T2s+, 92s+, 82s+, 72s+, 62s+, 52s+, 42s+, 32s, ATo-A2o, K2o+, Q2o+, J2o+, T2o+, 92o+, 82o+, 72o+, 62o+, 52o+, 42o+, 32o }
|
so in short....snap call. If you got lucky with A3, 46, 77 or 55,, congrats, but otherwise you were in dog land. You truly have MUBS if you are too worried to call here. and John Pearce, you don't like how the hand went down? You shouldn't have been in there. Fold-Pre. YULIMPWITHSHITTYHAND? _________________ The Man The Myth The Legend
MNOWAX |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2012 2:24 am Post subject: 115 |
|
|
I had 35. You go home now. (All of you.) Here's the full hand.
This thing that makes this unlikely to be a bluff is how likely he is to call. Unlike the hand above, his betting pattern shows real power, so I'm not going to bluff at him. Of course, there are still a few non-bluffs that you beat: Q3, J3, T3, 93, 83, 63, 43, 23 = 32 combinations. You might even imagine I could do that betting pattern with As 5s and Ad 7d, and that brings it up to 34 combinations. The hands that beat you that I could have: 35, 55, 4d 6d, and (barely) 77, which are only 15 combinations.
So, while I don't completely hate the call, there, I don't really like it in a tournament. By that analysis, you have a 2/3 chance of winning, but that really isn't enough early in a tournament in a case where you're still in good shape if you fold but you're out if you call and lose. In a live game, where you can just buy in again, it's an easy call. But early in a tournament, I think you should lay it down.
----
Edit: I counted wrong, because I wasn't taking into account the 5 and 7 on the board. 35, 55, 4d 6d, and 77, represents only 10 combinations, which means you had more like a 77% chance. That makes it a lot tougher to lay down. But I'm still stuck on the thought that a good player doesn't push all in there without a boat. I can't really say that I wouldn't have pushed, there, with Q3, but I don't think so. Plenty of players would, though, and he didn't necessarily have reason to believe that I was a good player. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MNOWAX
0.999... of a Troll
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2012 2:50 am Post subject: 116 |
|
|
| Zag wrote: |
I had 35. You go home now. (All of you.) Here's the full hand.
This thing that makes this unlikely to be a bluff is how likely he is to call. Unlike the hand above, his betting pattern shows real power, so I'm not going to bluff at him. Of course, there are still a few non-bluffs that you beat: Q3, J3, T3, 93, 83, 63, 43, 23 = 32 combinations. You might even imagine I could do that betting pattern with As 5s and Ad 7d, and that brings it up to 34 combinations. The hands that beat you that I could have: 35, 55, 4d 6d, and (barely) 77, which are only 15 combinations.
So, while I don't completely hate the call, there, I don't really like it in a tournament. By that analysis, you have a 2/3 chance of winning, but that really isn't enough early in a tournament in a case where you're still in good shape if you fold but you're out if you call and lose. In a live game, where you can just buy in again, it's an easy call. But early in a tournament, I think you should lay it down. |
I like the analysis, but I think you're being a little results oriented there. I think your range in there is WAY bigger than that in terms of non bluff hands doing that.
You make the move that would signify a 3 but it would also signify a Mid pocket pair when you smooth called the raise. You could have also smooth called the flop with Diamonds, a straight draw ( A4d is definitely in your range here) or even A5o.
I don't think he can simply just toss K3 in that situation when you make a little over Pot Size three bet on the turn. If he was afraid of the cooler deck, he shouldn't have min raised you. The min raise on the turn effectively is a challenge to play for stacks, hoping you'd try to push him off his hand.
Plus, If you made the FH on the flop, why would you try and get the money in on the turn? Are you trying to scare away diamond draws? It made no sense the way you played the FH, which is a stronger reason why K3 should be calling there, when he's effectively working in the blind here. It looks like you're bluffing off with diamonds or trying to scare off another 3.
There is no sense, even in a backward sense, that you're value raising with a FH. It too fancy of a move, even in the WRGPT, and if it wasn't such a cold deck, I think you'd be losing value here on the turn more than not. _________________ The Man The Myth The Legend
MNOWAX |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot
|
Posted: Sun Oct 28, 2012 3:58 am Post subject: 117 |
|
|
| MNOWAX wrote: |
| You make the move that would signify a 3 but it would also signify a Mid pocket pair when you smooth called the raise. You could have also smooth called the flop with Diamonds, a straight draw ( A4d is definitely in your range here) or even A5o. |
I agree with all those, but I would not have made the last bet with any of them, which is why I didn't not count them.
| MNOWAX wrote: |
| I don't think he can simply just toss K3 in that situation when you make a little over Pot Size three bet on the turn. If he was afraid of the cooler deck, he shouldn't have min raised you. The min raise on the turn effectively is a challenge to play for stacks, hoping you'd try to push him off his hand. |
You're thinking like a live-game player. The tournament player should be thinking, "He's betting 'out of the tournament' against that moderate pot.
| MNOWAX wrote: |
Plus, If you made the FH on the flop, why would you try and get the money in on the turn? Are you trying to scare away diamond draws? It made no sense the way you played the FH, which is a stronger reason why K3 should be calling there, when he's effectively working in the blind here. It looks like you're bluffing off with diamonds or trying to scare off another 3.
There is no sense, even in a backward sense, that you're value raising with a FH. It too fancy of a move, even in the WRGPT, and if it wasn't such a cold deck, I think you'd be losing value here on the turn more than not. |
I was not trying to chase away draws, of course. I was trying to make sure that, if he was drawing to a straight or a flush, he got his money in while he still had hope. (You see, my respect for my opponents is much less than I expect them to have for me. ) Actually, the analysis is spot on, once he made the min raise on the turn. That meant that he might be an idiot with a draw, in which case the reraise is correct, or he has a 3-something but not a boat, in which case the reraise is marginally correct (in that it would let a great player with a sick read get away from it), or he has a boat (which is guaranteed to be the same or better than mine). I had already made a similar analysis to the one I made above for his call of me, and decided that I was willing to bust out with this hand, if he did have a better boat, considering how unlikely it was. Remember that those odds for busting out of a tournament are very different when you are the one doing the betting than the one doing the calling.
On the flop, I actually had him on a flush draw as my top choice of read on him -- players often raise on the flop with position, looking to check behind on the turn. I bet out on the turn to avoid a check behind and then he misses his draw so I get no more money out of him. Note that my bet was chosen to leave him room to think that a flush or straight draw was mathematically correct, since I'd like nothing better than for him to hit his draw. But I don't want to put myself in the position that I only get more money from him if he does hit it. When he raised on the turn, with that stupid min raise, I became pretty sure he was not that good of a player, first off, and that he had probably exactly the hand he had, 3 and J or better kicker. If he actually already had me beat, then there's an excellent chance he'd just smooth call, though, as I said, I still expected to end up all in in that case, and had already accepted it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MNOWAX
0.999... of a Troll
|
Posted: Fri Apr 19, 2013 5:34 pm Post subject: 118 |
|
|
It's been awhile since us poker players have done any discussion here, so I'll cross post one from 2+2.
This is a live LL tournament played in a home cardroom.
HERO (BB): Playing TAG game, only has played two other hands since the tournament started never went to showdown.
Villain (button): Villain has been limping a lot then betting most flops, has only shown down one hand (K9o for a rivered pair of Kings). He is a regular in this tournament. I sense a loose passive preflop, more Laggy post flop.
5000 starting stacks: Blinds 100/200
UTG+2: calls 200
(folds)
V( 9000 ) button: calls 200
SB folds
Hero ( 5450 ) BB: Checks (6s4s)
Pot: 700 Flop 2c 3c 5d
Hero Checks
UTG+2 Checks
Button bets 400
Notes: Jackpot. There's a flush draw out there, so my thinking of a c/r here was risky, but profitable knowing that button would bet most flops. UTG+2 threw his cards in before I had acted, so it confirmed my decision to c/r. When villain calls, I'm putting him possible clubs, Ax suited, maybe A5o or A4o, or a medium pocket pair.
Hero Raises to 1200 total
Villain calls.
Pot: 3100 Turn 2c 3c 5d Ac
Hero Bets 1000
Villain Calls
Notes: Well ****. If he was calling with clubs, they hit. I bet 1000 to see where I was at in the hand. When he calls, I'm not as sure where I'm at in this hand as I would think a flush would have raised, and I wouldn't think a lone ace would call. Possibly two pair may call here, like A5 or A3.
Pot 5100 River 2c 3c 5d Ac 3d
Hero Checks
Villain Bets 1500
Notes: Well double ****. The board pairing didn't help things much, I don't put him on a three at all, but a flopped set could be in his range, although a little MUBS-y I think. Can he value bet two pair / low straight here? Maybe a weirdly played lone ace? Or am I more likely to see flushes here, given he limped PF and his range is rather large?
I'm not going to give the ending of the hand and what I did not to bias anyone. _________________ The Man The Myth The Legend
MNOWAX |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Trojan Horse
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Fri Apr 19, 2013 6:13 pm Post subject: 119 |
|
|
| He's got a full house. Bad beat on the river. I'm gone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot
|
Posted: Fri Apr 19, 2013 8:19 pm Post subject: 120 |
|
|
It depends a bit on the stack positions. But if you were playing a cash game, you'd consider that there's 6600 in the pot right now and it's 1500 to call. Even if you say he is 75% likely to have a boat (which would imply, I assume, a flopped set), it's still worth a call. (You're getting a little better than 4-to-1 pots odds.)
But I don't really think he flopped a set. Either he would have slow-played the set (not uncommon with the over-aggressive types -- paradoxically: it's totally wrong for them ever to slow-play) or he would have reraised the check-raise.
So, for him to have a boat on the river, he must have had 2-pair on the flop. What could that really be? 23? 35? Does he have standards at all?
I think he has a stray 4 and your 6-high straight is good. If the 1500 is not game-changing, I call. Of course, I would have bet more on both the check-raise and on the turn, so it would have been different for me altogether.
Edit: or maybe he picked up the 2-pair on the turn, with A3. The gutshot on the flop plus his embarrassment over being check-raised might have been enough for him to make that call. (... plus the fact that the raise part of the check-raise was too small.) I guess I'm a little worried about this. Again, I would not be caught here, because my check-raise would have been a slight overbet -- to something like 1800 or even 2000, rather than 1200. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|