|
|
|
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Scum
Daedalian Member
|
 Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2008 1:35 am Post subject: 41 |
 |
|
Hang the fool by his toes. He will be one less to kill for us!
maybe you'd like some...Meat pies?
_________________
I am Scum but you Don't know who i am! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ms. Lovett
Daedalian Member
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:02 am Post subject: 42 |
|
|
| Hmmm, well that was pointed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:43 am Post subject: 43 |
|
|
You asked for it SCUM. lol jk 
Yay Im back from fall break and ready to kill me some mafia but since I at this point have nothing helpful to add I will just continue to vote for Wall-E the dirtiest mafia player there is. Next to Amb of course
_________________
The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Intercom
Icarian Member
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2008 2:57 am Post subject: 44 |
|
|
| *Bzzt - Irgy, could I see you in my office for a moment? Thank you. - Crackle.* |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Irgy
Daedalian Member
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:06 am Post subject: 45 |
|
|
| Oh oh, I wonder what I've gone and done this time...? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
isauteikisa
Daedalian Member
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2008 3:33 am Post subject: 46 |
|
|
After mailing, I still haven't received a role. Oh well.
/confirm for the moment, no votes until I know what's what.
_________________
[VXCL] 075-1DR
I'm male, people. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
isauteikisa
Daedalian Member
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 4:24 am Post subject: 47 |
|
|
Vote: Wall-E
Has seemed to be good policy in the past 
_________________
[VXCL] 075-1DR
I'm male, people. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Green Crayons
Daedalian Member
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 4:17 pm Post subject: 48 |
|
|
In an attempt to get some discussion going, here are preliminary thoughts:
| irgy wrote: |
| For voting for people who vote for themselves. |
I've had people vote me for this before. Granted, I've also voted people who were voting themselves who turned out to be scum (MNOWAX, actually - if my memory serves me correctly, in a game here from a long while ago, as well as mith from a game on mafiascum.. though maybe mith was just in the game and was voting me for voting someone who was voting themselves... I can't really recall, it's been a while since I've played mafia... but the guy I was voting for him voting himself ended up being scum). I'm not saying that it's definitively a scum indicator, but scum have been shown to do it before.
| irgy wrote: |
| Personally I like to vote for exactly those people who don't vote for themselves. |
I assume this is a reference to a jester role? Jester roles are stupid. Shitty and stupid. I've never actually seen one in a game outside of scumchat. I don't think Crep would have his game spoiled by a single player being lynched... because that's exactly what jester roles do: spoil games.
| irgy wrote: |
| I also like to vote for people who don't make impossible to follow rules for how they vote, and Green Canyons fits that so far too. |
...What? Taking out the double negatives, your statement reads: "I also like to vote for people who do make possible to follow rules for how they vote, and GC fits that so far too." So you like to vote people who make general rules about finding scum? ... Seriously? Maybe you would prefer we just blindly vote forever and ever until scum (e.g. ...you?) win?
unvote, vote: irgy.
| MNOWAX wrote: |
| oh by the way I AM NOT a Jester. So you can vote for me ALL you want |
Smacks of the same rhetoric as a self-vote, which I still find suspicious. With this sparse landscape of discussion, MNOWAX is still my number two vote.
| isauteikisa wrote: |
Vote: Wall-E
Has seemed to be good policy in the past |
How so? 
Oh, and Shame on: raekuul, Leonidas, mps1453, Ctorj, bbbbbbbbba and esme. Yet to speak up. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Wall-E
Daedalian Member
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 7:47 pm Post subject: 49 |
|
|
@GC: From your bit about irgy I gather you agree with policy lynching and you're voting for irgy for being against policy voting. Is that right?
_________________
Don't read what I'm typing! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Wall-E
Daedalian Member
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 7:48 pm Post subject: 50 |
|
|
If I did read it right, you're essentially voting for irgy for the hipocrisy inherent to the statement: "I have a policy of ignoring policy."
_________________
Don't read what I'm typing! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
isauteikisa
Daedalian Member
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 7:51 pm Post subject: 51 |
|
|
@Green Crayons - I think I was the first person to put a vote on him on this site. I was just referencing that
unvote atm. No need to rush too much, we still have a few days.
_________________
[VXCL] 075-1DR
I'm male, people. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Green Crayons
Daedalian Member
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 8:07 pm Post subject: 52 |
|
|
| Wall-E wrote: |
| If I did read it right, you're essentially voting for irgy for the hipocrisy inherent to the statement: "I have a policy of ignoring policy." |
Hunh, that wasn't the point I was making - I missed that entirely - but it is a very good point (because hypocrits are bad and scumlike).
The point I was trying to make was basically that his vote against policy voting is an encourgement of abandoning a historically major tool in catching scum: that is, finding those who "slip up" and do something that is commonly seen to be as scummish and thus falls under a rule-of-scum and worthy of a vote.
isauteikisa: Ah, gotcha. ...Was he guilty in that game? 
_________________
Just for my personal reference when looking over posts: Choice Block One started on 10/11/08 --> nine days deadline = ends on 10/20/08 (Monday). |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Irgy
Daedalian Member
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 9:16 pm Post subject: 53 |
|
|
Green Canyons, I think you're really missing the point of day 1 page 1 votes; no-one has anything to go on, so we all make some random comments and arbitrary votes to try and get things going. There's a tendency for anyone who does anything amusing to get votes, which I think is a real shame, so I have a (fairly new) policy of voting for whoever's being a wet blanket instead, which in this case was (and still is) you. I'm not going to explain the joke, but it has something to do with a barber.
Nonetheless, unvote, because I don't personally believe that scum would put as much effort as you have so far into trying to psycho-analyse people this early in the game.
I'm now going to follow a policy (Oh oh, a policy! Quick! Better vote for myself!) of voting for a random person who hasn't posted anything yet. Because if there's one thing worse than wet blankets it's games dying due to lack of participation.
Vote esme |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ms. Lovett
Daedalian Member
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 9:38 pm Post subject: 54 |
|
|
| isauteikisa wrote: |
| @Green Crayons - I think I was the first person to put a vote on him on this site. I was just referencing that |
| Green Crayons wrote: |
| isauteikisa: Ah, gotcha. ...Was he guilty in that game? |
I personally would follow the rule of NOT voting for Wall-E right off the bat. Of the two games I've played with him (one here, one over at mafiascum) he always seems uber-guilty, finally gets lynched, and is of course innocent.
To Wall-E: Not that you're still not fair-game, of course. 
So was that post that the scum made the first puzzle, btw? Or will there be more of an announcement than that? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Irgy
Daedalian Member
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 10:22 pm Post subject: 55 |
|
|
| Ms. Lovett wrote: |
| So was that post that the scum made the first puzzle, btw? Or will there be more of an announcement than that? |
I would have thought we'd be told if it was a puzzle, but on the other hand if it's not, then where is the puzzle? Still, whether it's a puzzle or just a post it's worth pondering.
| Scum wrote: |
Hang the fool by his toes. He will be one less to kill for us!
maybe you'd like some...Meat pies? |
The first sentence seems to respond to and refer to MNOWAX who'd been acting the fool a bit. The second sentence seems quite bizzare on it's own. However, doing a bit of research...
Searching the forums, I can find two references to meat pies:
http://www.greylabyrinth.com/discussion/viewtopic.php?t=12914&highlight=meat+pie
http://www.greylabyrinth.com/discussion/viewtopic.php?t=13017&highlight=meat+pie
Both are from MNOWAX in reference to Ms. Lovett. I'm guessing the basis of them is that somewhere out there your name is a brand of meat pies or something Ms. Lovett?
The second seems to be a reference back to the first. The first was some (probably quite construed) throwaway banter in a game in which you were both scum and won quite successfully.
It's quite curious then that you're the first to suggest this might be a puzzle. I'm not sure what the significance of it all is, but do either of you care to explain any of this? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Wall-E
Daedalian Member
|
| Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 10:38 pm Post subject: 56 |
|
|
Ms. Lovett: I'm still learning, but I'm good at this game IRL, so I'm starting to find ways to transfer that skill into online gaming.
On Irgy: His unvote is scummy. His hypocrisy is scummy. Voting for "wet blankets" is scummy: Wet blankets are people who are taking the game seriously.
What say you, Irgy?
_________________
Don't read what I'm typing! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jayfin3
Daedalian Member
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 12:05 am Post subject: 57 |
|
|
| Green Crayons wrote: |
In an attempt to get some discussion going, here are preliminary thoughts:
| irgy wrote: |
| For voting for people who vote for themselves. |
I've had people vote me for this before. Granted, I've also voted people who were voting themselves who turned out to be scum (MNOWAX, actually - if my memory serves me correctly, in a game here from a long while ago, as well as mith from a game on mafiascum.. though maybe mith was just in the game and was voting me for voting someone who was voting themselves... I can't really recall, it's been a while since I've played mafia... but the guy I was voting for him voting himself ended up being scum). I'm not saying that it's definitively a scum indicator, but scum have been shown to do it before.
| irgy wrote: |
| Personally I like to vote for exactly those people who don't vote for themselves. |
I assume this is a reference to a jester role? Jester roles are stupid. Shitty and stupid. I've never actually seen one in a game outside of scumchat. I don't think Crep would have his game spoiled by a single player being lynched... because that's exactly what jester roles do: spoil games.
| irgy wrote: |
| I also like to vote for people who don't make impossible to follow rules for how they vote, and Green Canyons fits that so far too. |
...What? Taking out the double negatives, your statement reads: "I also like to vote for people who do make possible to follow rules for how they vote, and GC fits that so far too." So you like to vote people who make general rules about finding scum? ... Seriously? Maybe you would prefer we just blindly vote forever and ever until scum (e.g. ...you?) win?
unvote, vote: irgy.
| MNOWAX wrote: |
| oh by the way I AM NOT a Jester. So you can vote for me ALL you want |
Smacks of the same rhetoric as a self-vote, which I still find suspicious. With this sparse landscape of discussion, MNOWAX is still my number two vote.
| isauteikisa wrote: |
Vote: Wall-E
Has seemed to be good policy in the past |
How so?
Oh, and Shame on: raekuul, Leonidas, mps1453, Ctorj, bbbbbbbbba and esme. Yet to speak up. |
Your first two paragraphs are fluff.
Really Green Crayons, REALLY? You vote Irgy because he added an extra negative? Really? REALLY?
It's clear from your post that you believe we were out of the random voting stage (and we definitely are now). So why vote someone for a bullshit reason? That is what the random voting is for. Don't mix the two levels of interaction.
About MNOWAX...Ok, so why even bring up MNOWAX? And you say he is your number two suspect...really Green Crayons, REALLY?
MNOWAX obviously voted himself as a joke. I even thought it was funny. You have no basis to vote him seriously on it. Or even suspect him seriously. Puh lease.
About these puzzles...I can't glean anything yet...but Irgy, you need to watch some current movies...ever hear of Sweeny Todd? Look it up. Brand of meat pie, huh.
_________________
So good looking |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ms. Lovett
Daedalian Member
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 12:51 am Post subject: 58 |
|
|
| Wall-E wrote: |
| Ms. Lovett: I'm still learning, but I'm good at this game IRL, so I'm starting to find ways to transfer that skill into online gaming. |
I didn't mean to imply that you are not good at mafia, I've seen you make some good points before; but yeah, it has seemed like in the past scum have loved to make you a target for an easy lynch. (myself included actually) A lot of it is probably just being loquacious.
| Irgy wrote: |
| It's quite curious then that you're the first to suggest this might be a puzzle. I'm not sure what the significance of it all is, but do either of you care to explain any of this? |
Well, like jayfin just mentioned...meat pies are awesome! Seriously, you should check Sweeney Todd out, if you don't like Johnny Depp, then the older stage play is worth a view or two, imo anyway. I mentioned it might be the puzzle because the way the post was phrased was very cryptic, and I couldn't tell if that was just going to be the persona of "Scum" or if that is a hint that it is a puzzle to be solved. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Green Crayons
Daedalian Member
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 1:54 am Post subject: 59 |
|
|
| Irgy wrote: |
| Green Canyons, I think you're really missing the point of day 1 page 1 votes; no-one has anything to go on, so we all make some random comments and arbitrary votes to try and get things going. There's a tendency for anyone who does anything amusing to get votes, which I think is a real shame, so I have a (fairly new) policy of voting for whoever's being a wet blanket instead, which in this case was (and still is) you. I'm not going to explain the joke, but it has something to do with a barber. |
I understand both the meaning of a wet blanket as well as that you've taken up a (defensive?) condescending tone. Getting a bit touchy?
And it isn't Canyons.
Of course page one votes are more "random" than not, but there's a difference between "random comments and arbitrary votes" such as voting for obviously absurd reasons (e.g. picking one's nose - see: dragon's first vote) and commentary that is psedu-intellectual in its rhetoric that can be easily passed off as a genuine stance... or not, if people see through the scum-crap (see: your post).
Now, assuming page one votes are more random than not - meaning, that they're based off of a lack of in-game knowledge - what are we supposed to do with our page two votes? Completely ignore page one? And what about page three? Should we compare notes between page two and three of people's stances? What about page one? is that still off limits? Or should we just assume that some knowledge will fall from the sky into our laps?
Of course not. The information I have to go off of at page one and two is page one votes and commentary, and frankly yours stinks (likewise, page three is built off of pages one and two, and so on, so forth). So you not only start off with a bad suggestion ("rules to vote by is bad!"), but now you're suggesting that the main tools the town has to work with (previous posts upon which to build our suspicions) should be disregarded. I'm not suggesting that day one posts automatically hold little nuggets of wisdom - though I believe there can be telling clues. Such as, for example, your rhetoric: dismiss conventional wisdom while applying a snarky (yet not amusing) tone in that dismissal. ...And what do you know? It split over onto page two. I must be onto something.
My vote stands until something more telling occurs.
| Irgy wrote: |
| I'm now going to follow a policy (Oh oh, a policy! Quick! Better vote for myself!) |
| Green Crayons wrote: |
| I understand both the meaning of a wet blanket as well as that you've taken up a (defensive?) condescending tone. Getting a bit touchy? |
| Irgy wrote: |
| It's quite curious then that you're the first to suggest this might be a puzzle. I'm not sure what the significance of it all is, but do either of you care to explain any of this? |
This is an interesting point, as I had assumed it was mocking banter. Same for the connection between MNOWAX and Lovett. The link has the following people from that game in this one: Ms. Lovett, Undercover Monk, isauteikisa, The Dragon's Princess, MNOWAX, Leonidas and Wall-E (the front page didn't have a full list, so I skimmed a few pages... so if I missed anyone let me know). If it was just a throw away taunt, I wouldn't be surprised that any of these people were behind the scum mask. Since they're so many, that doesn't really help us, but later on when we're fewer in number it may be a point to remember. If it is the riddle, can we get a mod confirmation that this is the riddle we're supposed to go after? I'm abysmal at riddle-solving and would like to think I'm wracking my brains for something that is actually a riddle and not just crap made to confuse us.
| jayfin wrote: |
| Your first two paragraphs are fluff. |
Hardly. Paragraph one: explaining the voting someone voting themselves situation. I have seen in the past where scum vote themselves, or make jokes about voting themselves, or make jokes about how they're scum in past games. Also in past games, I always vote for people who vote themselves - at least in the earlier portions - because it's more likely to prove to be a good choice than, say, keeping my vote on a random choice. Paragraph two: some discussion had come up regarding a jester role. Granted, this discussion was minor, but then again, discussion has been minor this entire game. Contributing to that conversation is fluff? ...Really?
| jayfin wrote: |
| Really Green Crayons, REALLY? You vote Irgy because he added an extra negative? Really? REALLY? |
Two points. One, I don't know about anyone else, but I always preview what I'm about to say. It enables me to make sure what I want to say actually gets across clearly. I would assume everyone else does this. Therefore, I was assuming he didn't make a grammatical error. Two, this might have a bit more weight if Irgy has responded to my post but nowhere in his response did he say he misspoke. He didn't go, "Oh, GC, I accidentally put a double negative in there when I meant to just put in one." He doesn't retract his statements, he merely excuses them as page one ramblings.
Words are important. What Irgy said was important - even more so because he doesn't step away from his words... you apparently are chivalrous enough to come to his aide to put that defense forward. Shame his actions doesn't really match up to the excuse you're trying to set up. Your unsuccessful defense is duly noted.
| jayfin wrote: |
| It's clear from your post that you believe we were out of the random voting stage (and we definitely are now). So why vote someone for a bullshit reason? That is what the random voting is for. Don't mix the two levels of interaction. |
It's noted how you're discrediting my not-bullshit (for page two) reasoning as bullshit without backing up that claim outside of coming to Irgy's defense with something that just doesn't actually fly. And these "two levels of interaction" of yours is exceptionally arbitrary. It's different because you say it is? And your word is law? Maybe you should post these rules as to when joke votes are in play and when we should start taking posts serious. ...Or maybe you could just tell us who to vote for so we don't have to think at all?
| jayfin wrote: |
| About MNOWAX...Ok, so why even bring up MNOWAX? And you say he is your number two suspect...really Green Crayons, REALLY? |
Yes, really, jayfin, really. I've already explained my reasoning for suspecting people who vote themselves. They stick out amongst the sea of players from the first two pages. ...Unless if you're saying that there is some other profound wisdom I should start my reasoning on page one? I start analyzing posts from the first second, joke posts or not. Is it something that is going to make me want to lynch him at the end of Day One? Hopefully not (assuming enough discussion comes up). But it's definitely something that I'll keep in the back of my mind (and a mark of a scummy action under his name on my chart) for later on down the road.
| jayfin wrote: |
| MNOWAX obviously voted himself as a joke. I even thought it was funny. You have no basis to vote him seriously on it. Or even suspect him seriously. Puh lease. |
You even thought it was funny? I didn't realize that we should consult you not only to determine what is and is not random voting, what should and should not be considered to be potential fodder to analyze, but we should also seek your guidance in where to find humor at the GL. An Appeal to Authority is always a logical fallacy that one should take with a grain of salt.
http://greylabyrinth.com/discussion/viewtopic.php?t=11411&highlight=
http://mafiascum.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2819&highlight=
These are the two examples I referred to earlier. I haven''t played in numerous mafia games since I started this trend of voting those who vote themselves (it started right when I was winding down in mafia), but I have found in those that I do, the people who usually joke about themselves being scum/vote themselves have a higher chance of actually scum (heck, I even did it in a game on GL and got called out on it when I was scum which kicked off my theory) than a random person on the list and so it isn't a bad decision.
As if it isn't obvious: FoS: jayfin. If Irgy is scum, jayfin's scum potential will go up significantly in my opinion. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
The Great Crep'er
2% Spambot
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 2:05 am Post subject: 60 |
|
|
Prods to go out on Saturday
Also, since I have been a bit unattentive to the game, I have decided to extend the deadline, add 5 more days. But this will be the only time the choiceblock is extended from here on out.
Vote count to come soon. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Intercom
Icarian Member
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 2:16 am Post subject: 61 |
|
|
*Bzzt - thedragon'sprincess, please report to your station. - Crackle*
_________________
Bzzt Crackle... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
The Great Crep'er
2% Spambot
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 2:43 am Post subject: 62 |
|
|
Choiceblock I, Votecount 1:
Irgy: 1 (Green Crayons)
Green Crayons: 2 (jayfin3, Wall-E)
Wall-E: 2 (thedragon'sprincess, Undercover Monk)
esme: 1 (Irgy
15 alive, 8 to lynch (4 at deadline) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Irgy
Daedalian Member
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 5:21 am Post subject: 63 |
|
|
Well, a few things to say.
Firstly, sincere apologies to Green Crayons for getting his name wrong, not sure why I thought it was 'Canyons', makes a lot less sense that 'Crayons' anyway. I do sometimes mess with people's names to wind them up but this time it was just a mistake. So sorry about that.
Secondly, it looks like with the meat pie thing I've just over-analysed a quote from something I haven't seen, so I guess give up on that whole line. Which is a shame because it had felt like I was getting somewhere 
Finally, am I being snarky? Probably. I made a joke, with a subtext of not liking a policy of targetting votes at people for making jokes (the reason being that it reduces fun by discouraging people from making interesting posts). The result of this is screenfuls of accusations based on taking my joke literally and completely missing the point of it. I guess I should be amused at the irony of it or something, but for the moment it's just annoying.
Part of the problem is probably that my past experience of people voting for themselves contradicts Green Crayons', so I haven't given his argument much weight.
At least it's generated some activity anyway. I'd much rather vote people off than have them mod killed, so I'll leave my vote on a non-poster and hope some of the quiet ones can join in. I encourage others to do the same, as it should either flush out lurkers or get rid of people who aren't playing anyway. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
esme
Daedalian Member
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 10:13 am Post subject: 64 |
|
|
vote:Irgy
for voting me before I had received my role. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
thedragon'sprincess
Daedalian Member
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 2:29 pm Post subject: 65 |
|
|
I find it strange that raekuul has been posting in other games but not this one
unvote, vote: raekuul |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Irgy
Daedalian Member
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 9:16 pm Post subject: 66 |
|
|
Ahh welcome esme
Now that you've posted, unvote Sorry to hear you didn't have a role yet.
In that case I'll move on to another random non-poster:
vote bbbbbbbbba |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Wall-E
Daedalian Member
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2008 12:28 am Post subject: 67 |
|
|
Hm.
Unvote Vote: Irgy
Let's see what this does.
_________________
Don't read what I'm typing! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ms. Lovett
Daedalian Member
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2008 6:44 pm Post subject: 68 |
|
|
| Is it intentional that you left my vote for MNOWAX off the votecount? (Not being sarcastic, I remember in one of the old Deep South's that I read that sometimes a person's vote wouldn't count, while some people's vote would as two, etc.) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
esme
Daedalian Member
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2008 7:36 pm Post subject: 69 |
|
|
I looked at the original Deep South and I had totally forgotten that the Intercom was blown up on a landmined post. So maybe the non-posters are just scared.
But weren't we promised a puzzle to solve each choiceblock? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ms. Lovett
Daedalian Member
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2008 11:01 pm Post subject: 70 |
|
|
*looks at profile* w00t, I'm a dead alien!! yaaaay!
Back to business though, yeah esme that's what I was talking about earlier. It seems as though the post that "Scum" made must be the puzzle...unless the puzzle is posed toward the end of the choiceblock or something.
And if the silent posters are afraid that they're gonna get blown up or something...well, man up! (or woman if you prefer) We must stand up and fight! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
esme
Daedalian Member
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 9:52 am Post subject: 71 |
|
|
I don't think that the puzzle should be unlabelled because then the scum could just post four posts of gibberish.
If it is a puzzle, then the answer might be Ms. Lovett. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MNOWAX
0.999... of a Troll
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 3:03 pm Post subject: 72 |
|
|
TGC has a different way of confirming than other mods.
FYI if you haven't received a Role yet, you have to PM TGC to confirm that you are in the game first. posting in the thread is not enough.
that being said. yeah i have referenced lovett actually three times. those two times plus there was once in the new gler's thread where i made reference to her. Mrs. Lovett is a main character from Sweeny todd, which bakes Meat pies.out of ..ahem interesting meat. It a nice way of implicating two people at once.
_________________
The Man The Myth The Legend
MNOWAX |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
jayfin3
Daedalian Member
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 1:48 am Post subject: 73 |
|
|
just wanna say im here, but really busy, so ill try to contribute in the next coupla days. sorry
_________________
So good looking |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Green Crayons
Daedalian Member
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 9:06 pm Post subject: 74 |
|
|
| Lovett wrote: |
| Is it intentional that you left my vote for MNOWAX off the votecount? |
Curious to see an updated vote count.
| esme wrote: |
| I looked at the original Deep South and I had totally forgotten that the Intercom was blown up on a landmined post. So maybe the non-posters are just scared. |
From what I recall when I skimmed over that thread, the blowing up of the intercom didn't harm any of the real players - it just "killed" the "player" Intercom.
| esme wrote: |
| If it is a puzzle, then the answer might be Ms. Lovett. |
Yeah, I guess. The first part, "Hang the fool by his toes. He will be one less to kill for us!" seems to be referring to MNOWAX (since the discussion was about the potential reprocussions of lynching said player). The second half of "maybe you'd like some...Meat pies?" - as people have pointed out - seems to point to Lovett. Maybe the answer is one of the games that they were in together where it was referenced? (Vanilla Mafia)  I dunno.
| MNOWAX wrote: |
| It a nice way of implicating two people at once. |
...Yeah, if they really did their homework. Like... really, really did their homework. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MNOWAX
0.999... of a Troll
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 9:35 pm Post subject: 75 |
|
|
Mod: if we are answering the puzzle, do we need to bold our answers?
I dunno. Its also a fact that i actually pulled some strings and vouched for her to come into this game, which was stated in the signup thread.
_________________
The Man The Myth The Legend
MNOWAX |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
thedragon'sprincess
Daedalian Member
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 7:41 pm Post subject: 76 |
|
|
| I'm moving this week and will be without internet til the end of this week or possibly next week. sorry for any inconvenience |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Wall-E
Daedalian Member
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2008 10:01 pm Post subject: 77 |
|
|
| MNOWAX wrote: |
| Mod: if we are answering the puzzle, do we need to bold our answers? |
Seconding this question.
_________________
Don't read what I'm typing! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Scum
Daedalian Member
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 12:40 am Post subject: 78 |
|
|
he who sees him, needs him,
but everyone will lay with him
_________________
I am Scum but you Don't know who i am! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
The Great Crep'er
2% Spambot
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 1:01 am Post subject: 79 |
|
|
Players: It does not necessarily need to be bolded, but doing so would be greatly appreciated.
My apologies for being rather tardy with this game, I have been swamped with so many things. A votecount to come once we reach another page...and I'm gettng those prods out there. Sit tight. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2008 3:45 am Post subject: 80 |
|
|
that reminds me of the hobbit. "Riddles in the dark" anyone?
_________________
The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
