| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
thedragon'sprincess
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Fri May 01, 2009 11:45 pm Post subject: 201 |
|
|
| so I'm getting voted for sticking up for someone- awesome. If you guys want to get a significant number of votes on me, then I will claim but I'm not going to claim just because one person doesn't like me sticking up for the claimed cop. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lexprod
NOT not a title
|
Posted: Sat May 02, 2009 4:09 am Post subject: 202 |
|
|
| Quote: |
| oh dont you worry- I DO have proof he's telling the truth. I believe it's too early in the game to announce how I know, but just trust me when I say raekuul is telling the truth |
It's not just sticking up for someone, it's this outright "I know 100% that he's a cop" thing that bothers me personally. I mean it can be legit, but how would you know other than something like siblings, masons, or lying? I'd like to know, so vote thedragon'sprincess. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos
|
Posted: Sat May 02, 2009 5:53 pm Post subject: 203 |
|
|
Alright here comes my first big contribution post, ignoring for a moment the tdp/raekuul drama i would just like to point something out. WE HAVE AT LEAST A 1 IN 3 CHANCE OF NAILING SCUM TODAY. woot! crazy hat dance.
Now lets look at the suspects we have:
tdp
silverstar
Sab
Poison
EC
Snicklac
that should be our short list for today. Now lets assume that Rae is the sheriff (not verified til he hits a scum) with a sheriff he can investigate tdp today instead of giving away valuable intel, tdp is not a likely choice for scum tonight because they have a sheriff to kill and hopefully a doc to find (please continue to protect Rae). Also the scum will likely kill off a non s to avoid narrowing the odds for tomorow. (crap im a target). So if we assume tdp innocence (knock on wood) then we are left with 5 suspects at least 2 of which, maybe 3, are scum.
Open Season my lads. Time to investigate.
So if we hit a scum i would suggest a tdp investigation, if we miss a s-player investigation. _________________ The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos
|
Posted: Sat May 02, 2009 6:31 pm Post subject: 204 |
|
|
silverstar- posted 4 times seems to be lurking
Sab- posted 5 times since confirming, 3 one sentence questions and a stab at the riddle.
Poison- Has posted reguarly no real scum moments jump out, but he has proven he can be crafty in simple mafia
EC- post production has gone down since early in the game.
Snicklac- posted reguarly was one of the first to call out rae and tdp after their claims.
I would suggest Sab as he seems to be truly lurking without seeming to lurk, at least I didnt realize he was until I took a hard look at his post count. so....
Vote: sAbLLimINal _________________ The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Scum
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sat May 02, 2009 6:38 pm Post subject: 205 |
|
|
of courSe at leaSt two mafia memberS have a S in their uSername. In fact they all do, ItS called the Scum account, duh! _________________ I am Scum but you Don't know who i am! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wall-E
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sat May 02, 2009 8:32 pm Post subject: 206 |
|
|
Unvote: Vote: Sniklac
His most recent post screams scum to me.
| Quote: |
| I woulda never guessed that riddle lol.....not a great clue though since a lot of people have an "s" in their name. For now though I think ill vote the dragonsprincess for still not explaining how raekuuls claim was valid and fos raekuul for simply not being killed after claiming so early |
Previously he has never voted for a player with an S in their name despite having voted for four different players. _________________ Don't read what I'm typing! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wall-E
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sat May 02, 2009 8:35 pm Post subject: 207 |
|
|
It does look rather bad for sAb, in isolation. _________________ Don't read what I'm typing! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thedragon'sprincess
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sat May 02, 2009 11:52 pm Post subject: 208 |
|
|
| just a quick note to everyone my fiancee and I are in the process of moving into our new house, so for the next few weeks I won't be available on the weekends |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos
|
Posted: Sun May 03, 2009 2:51 am Post subject: 209 |
|
|
| Wall-E wrote: |
Unvote: Vote: Sniklac
Previously he has never voted for a player with an S in their name despite having voted for four different players. |
Ouch good stat Wall-E I would get behind a Sicklak or Sab wagon _________________ The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sAbLLimINal
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sun May 03, 2009 12:28 pm Post subject: 210 |
|
|
| Undercover Monk wrote: |
I would suggest Sab as he seems to be truly lurking without seeming to lurk, at least I didnt realize he was until I took a hard look at his post count. so....
Vote: sAbLLimINal |
well, sorry, i'm not used to playing with this many people.
BTW, could we please replace Irgy? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MNOWAX
0.999... of a Troll
|
Posted: Sun May 03, 2009 4:16 pm Post subject: 211 |
|
|
im a looking _________________ The Man The Myth The Legend
MNOWAX |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
raekuul
Lives under a bridge & tells stories.
|
Posted: Sun May 03, 2009 6:08 pm Post subject: 212 |
|
|
| Hmm... are we looking to Bandwagon sab? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sniklac16
Spaciest of aides
|
Posted: Sun May 03, 2009 6:56 pm Post subject: 213 |
|
|
| thedragon'sprincess wrote: |
| so I'm getting voted for sticking up for someone- awesome. If you guys want to get a significant number of votes on me, then I will claim but I'm not going to claim just because one person doesn't like me sticking up for the claimed cop. |
Its more than sticking up for him like lexprod said, cuz if you really had proof he was telling the truth you would of said something already so that we wouldnt vote for him and hed be safe at least one more night. But by not saying anything you give the impression either your both scum or you are for not not saying anything so wed vote for him _________________ What lies behind us and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thedragon'sprincess
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sun May 03, 2009 7:18 pm Post subject: 214 |
|
|
| why should I claim when there's not a huge bandwagon on me and risk getting nightkilled? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sniklac16
Spaciest of aides
|
Posted: Sun May 03, 2009 9:20 pm Post subject: 215 |
|
|
No ones asking you to claim we just wanna know how you know raekuul was tellin the truth about being a cop. Because if you can prove he was then no one will vote for him and we'll have him for at least one for night _________________ What lies behind us and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thedragon'sprincess
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 12:11 am Post subject: 216 |
|
|
| ok fine... I know that he investigated undercover monk last night. lets just leave it at that |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
raekuul
Lives under a bridge & tells stories.
|
Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 12:20 am Post subject: 217 |
|
|
| Uh, everyone active knew that already. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thedragon'sprincess
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 12:55 am Post subject: 218 |
|
|
| not necessarily... if you were scum, you could have very easily picked a random person and said you investigated them- especially since you made it through the night |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sAbLLimINal
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 1:08 am Post subject: 219 |
|
|
| but if raekuul was scum, why wouldn't the real cop claim? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thedragon'sprincess
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 1:08 am Post subject: 220 |
|
|
| if they had a death wish maybe |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Scum
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 2:10 am Post subject: 221 |
|
|
aRe yUO SUre tHe coP is aCTually sNAe? Or EVen a PoLIce OFFicEr? _________________ I am Scum but you Don't know who i am! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wall-E
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 6:01 am Post subject: 222 |
|
|
The intentional disfigurement of the grammar, spelling and masking of capitalization might be motivated by a fear of someone guessing the scum based on prior Scum account posts.
There's something awesome about the scum having an anonymous account and taunting us like this. It really puts me in the mood to scumhunt, and I'm sure the wolves are enjoying themselves. Hi scum! *waves*
Just posting to post, really. I'm waiting for sab to be lynched or something to pop out at me and watching the exchange between tdp and others with interest. _________________ Don't read what I'm typing! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wall-E
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 6:02 am Post subject: 223 |
|
|
I'm re-interpreting that last post as the scum mocking me for voting Sab. Any reaction is a good reaction, though. I'm sticking to this one for now. _________________ Don't read what I'm typing! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wall-E
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 6:12 am Post subject: 224 |
|
|
Bah. Forgot which S I'd banked on. Ignore my last post. _________________ Don't read what I'm typing! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wall-E
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 6:13 am Post subject: 225 |
|
|
FoS: Sab for what I said two posts ago, however. _________________ Don't read what I'm typing! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
raekuul
Lives under a bridge & tells stories.
|
Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 12:55 pm Post subject: 226 |
|
|
| ...thank you, Scum, for saying the same thing I said when I roleclaimed: I don't *know* whether or not I'm sane. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wall-E
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon May 04, 2009 8:24 pm Post subject: 227 |
|
|
A vote for sAb or Sniklac is a vote for scum! _________________ Don't read what I'm typing! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wall-E
Daedalian Member
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
lexprod
NOT not a title
|
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 5:40 am Post subject: 229 |
|
|
I still find TDP's mystery role somewhat suspicious, but then again I suppose a role that simply knows if someone's active in the night is more likely to be protown than proscum. I'll downgrade to FOS: TDP for now, seeing as it's not gaining enough votes to force a roleclaim, and said roleclaim may blow up in our faces if I'm wrong about my scumhunch. So I Unvote
Of the remaining 5 Ss, the ones most scummy are silver (lurking), sniklac (OMGUS from page 2), and sab (essentially lurking).
I'm gonna hop on the bandwagon and Vote: Sablliminal to get things moving. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Wall-E
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 6:14 am Post subject: 230 |
|
|
sAbLLimINal - ALL IN
I get it now. _________________ Don't read what I'm typing! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
raekuul
Lives under a bridge & tells stories.
|
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 12:08 pm Post subject: 231 |
|
|
My computer access is going to be somewhat... reduced for the next week or so as my regular computer is getting repair work done.
My vote will lay on sab. vote: sAbLLimINal |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thedragon'sprincess
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 12:36 pm Post subject: 232 |
|
|
| I agree either sniclak or sab lynch- I don't like lurkers, ans sniclak just seems suspicous. but before I vote, mod con we have a votecount please? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Silverstar
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 1:24 pm Post subject: 233 |
|
|
| I would vote sab, but I don't want hammer him.[/b] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Scum
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 5:33 pm Post subject: 234 |
|
|
Presenting Wall-E! The amazing one-man mafia game, with enough pananoia for an entire lynch mob _________________ I am Scum but you Don't know who i am! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MNOWAX
0.999... of a Troll
|
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 6:16 pm Post subject: 235 |
|
|
Official Vote Count
Players needed to lynch: 6
sAbLLimINal - 3 - Lexprod, Raekuul, Undercover Monk - (L-3)
Sinklac16 - 1 - Wall-e - (L-5)
Thedragon'sprincess - 1 - Sinklac16 - (L-5)
Players not voting: Escaped Convict, Irgy, Poisonium, sAbLLimINal, Silverstar, Thedragon'sprincess
I may have replacement for Irgy... stay tuned... _________________ The Man The Myth The Legend
MNOWAX |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Escaped Convict
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 8:46 pm Post subject: 236 |
|
|
alright, we need to get this moving. I'll join the bandwagon vote: sAbLLimINal _________________ forgetaboutit |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Poisonium
annoyed by the old
|
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 9:45 pm Post subject: 237 |
|
|
| lexprod wrote: |
| I still find TDP's mystery role somewhat suspicious, but then again I suppose a role that simply knows if someone's active in the night is more likely to be protown than proscum. I'll downgrade to FOS: TDP for now, seeing as it's not gaining enough votes to force a roleclaim, and said roleclaim may blow up in our faces if I'm wrong about my scumhunch. So I Unvote |
It's called tracker or watcher. It's a very situational role, mostly being of little use.
Vote: Sab
I don't see Sniklac as scum as much, but Sab definitely is. From my point of view there's no better candidate, anyway. _________________ I tried apt-get install lifebut it only returned E: Couldn't find package life |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sniklac16
Spaciest of aides
|
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 9:59 pm Post subject: 238 |
|
|
After reading all the posts by Sab I agree he/she is def scum. Sab only made like 5 or 6 posts nothing of any importance to make it seem he/she wasn't lurking. So I guess I'll be the final nail in the coffin unvote vote Sab _________________ What lies behind us and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos
|
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 10:32 pm Post subject: 239 |
|
|
noting snickcs hammer....hmmmmm _________________ The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sAbLLimINal
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue May 05, 2009 10:35 pm Post subject: 240 |
|
|
this is my first bah post. But anyways, good luck side that I'm on cuz I don't want to give away what my side is right now to add suspense! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|