The Grey Labyrinth is a collection of puzzles, riddles, mind games, paradoxes and other intellectually challenging diversions. Related topics: puzzle games, logic puzzles, lateral thinking puzzles, philosophy, mind benders, brain teasers, word problems, conundrums, 3d puzzles, spatial reasoning, intelligence tests, mathematical diversions, paradoxes, physics problems, reasoning, math, science.

   
The Grey Labyrinth Forum Index
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups    RegisterRegister  
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Redwall Mafia Game Thread MAFIA WINS
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
 
Reply to topic    The Grey Labyrinth Forum Index -> Mafia Games
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
sAbLLimINal
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 6:49 pm    Post subject: 281 Reply with quote

Wait a minute, Snicklac16 was killed, but he was a mason which could mean that he mismasoned, which could mean that there is no killer.

This makes sense because the killer and mafia could joint win, but nobody has done that, which makes me to believe there is no killer.

I still believe Lamont is scum.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lamont_Cranston
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 7:04 pm    Post subject: 282 Reply with quote

Well, excellent analysis post (I mean the fact you posted it far more than the content Wink )

So you're saying that me & Courk are scum buddies? Well I can understand that... I definitely see Courk as pro-town and have supported her as such throughout the game.

The following people are cleared town: Loki & MNO

That leaves the following people as potential scum: Courk, CreativeSab, Zag, Lamont

Now, CreativeSab has done nothing this whole game but lurk except for D1. On D1 he: Voted Wall_E (town) & voted MNO (town). After this he just drops off the radar. Now the question is, who is his scum buddy?

This leaves Courk or Zag...

I'm definitely leaning Zag but I am conflicted because of MNO's read on Zag and his respoonse when "claimed" scum by MNO...

I think a CreativeSab lynch will clear this up... Almost Fonz Cool

Vote CreativeSab
_________________
Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Courk
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 7:21 pm    Post subject: 283 Reply with quote

sAbLLimINal wrote:
Wait a minute, Snicklac16 was killed, but he was a mason which could mean that he mismasoned, which could mean that there is no killer.

This makes sense because the killer and mafia could joint win, but nobody has done that, which makes me to believe there is no killer.

I still believe Lamont is scum.


1. I'm a girl
2. I don't understand the quoted post. "mismasoned"???
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
sAbLLimINal
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 8:04 pm    Post subject: 284 Reply with quote

Lamont, I'm replacing loki, not creative.

mismason is when the mason choose to mason someone, but they are killed because they picked scum.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Courk
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 8:16 pm    Post subject: 285 Reply with quote

I see.

It's possible the masonry could recruit, but the two masons we have are paired together in the book. It'd be quite a coincidence if one just happened to recruit the other. Plus, this is a small game. I think a recruiting masonry would be too powerful.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
Lamont_Cranston
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 8:23 pm    Post subject: 286 Reply with quote

Oh crap. Sorry. Working too hard, sleeping too much.

Unvote

I will wait to hear from Creative.
_________________
Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Lamont_Cranston
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 8:24 pm    Post subject: 287 Reply with quote

Courk wrote:
I see.

It's possible the masonry could recruit, but the two masons we have are paired together in the book. It'd be quite a coincidence if one just happened to recruit the other. Plus, this is a small game. I think a recruiting masonry would be too powerful.

I agree here.
_________________
Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Lamont_Cranston
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 8:29 pm    Post subject: 288 Reply with quote

Ok, so LokiSab & MNO are cleared.

That leaves Courk, Creative, Zag

I'm going to vote Creative until I hear from him.

Vote Creative
_________________
Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Zag
Tired of his old title



PostPosted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 8:48 pm    Post subject: 289 Reply with quote

Hi all,

I tried, I really tried, just to stay quiet, since I mostly seem to put my foot in it when I speak my mind, but it isn't in me. Revenge most foul!

First off, I want to say that I'm over my little snit with MNO. Sorry, MNO, I didn't take it well when I felt so jerked around. But I do have a question re post #246. If you DID feel that way, why did you choose me to make your accusation against? I don't get it.

I would like, for a moment, to mention the elephant in the room: the double kill last night. I know that MNO's theory is that it means that there is a vig or SK, plus a mafia roleblocker who blocked that person on the first night. If that's the case, then doesn't it mean that all the mafia know who the vig/SK is, because they know whom they blocked on the first night? (Or does only the one roleblocker get to know whom he/she blocked?) So the other townies are the only one who don't know the identity. I guess also that it is only the player himself knows which, vig or SK, he is. (... or she -- it might be you, Courk!)

I have figured out one thing. By doing stupid stuff and appearing scummy, off and on through the game, I have kept the mafia from killing me. I'm bound to get myself lynched all on my own, soon enough! Here's hoping it isn't tonight! Extreme Delectation I don't THINK I've done anything to arouse suspicion in this note, but I've thought that before and been wrong.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Zag
Tired of his old title



PostPosted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 9:01 pm    Post subject: 290 Reply with quote

Wow! Five notes simulposted with that one.

sAb, you shouldn't be surprised that Lamont got confused about whom you were replacing, he didn't even know that HE was the one to replace Wall-E (see post 135).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Zag
Tired of his old title



PostPosted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 9:09 pm    Post subject: 291 Reply with quote

Zag wrote:
But I do have a question re post #246. If you DID feel that way, why did you choose me to make your accusation against? I don't get it.


In rereading, I guess you did answer this, in post #256. I guess I see your point, but I don't see that your test necessarily smoked anything out, other than Lamont's willingness to follow orders. On the other hand, your logic does work, that certainly scum would jump on the chance to have a good excuse for voting a townie, so I don't think it is any evidence in his favor, either.

Yay for multi-posts!!

Since everyone else has them, my FoS: Creative, Lamont, Courk.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
MNOWAX
0.999... of a Troll



PostPosted: Mon Jun 29, 2009 9:11 pm    Post subject: 292 Reply with quote

Zag - if i made an accusation on scum the scum wouldn't have blindly followed the lynch. the scum need a townie to lynch to win. I figured you were a townie, and the scum would follow into the trap
_________________
The Man The Myth The Legend
MNOWAX
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Courk
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 2:09 am    Post subject: 293 Reply with quote

One thing about the roleblocked on the first night = vig/SK is that a vig didn't necessarily try to kill anyone night 1. In fact, it'd be rather stupid for a vig to do so. The roleblocker could block townie A, leaving vig B alone, with vig B choosing not to kill anyone.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
Zag
Tired of his old title



PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 2:32 am    Post subject: 294 Reply with quote

Thanks, MNO. But I assume you saw my simulpost.

Also, thanks, Courk. I realize that I had even thought of that before, but then forgot it. That makes me feel better, though I have no idea why.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Lamont_Cranston
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 3:55 am    Post subject: 295 Reply with quote

Courk wrote:
One thing about the roleblocked on the first night = vig/SK is that a vig didn't necessarily try to kill anyone night 1. In fact, it'd be rather stupid for a vig to do so. The roleblocker could block townie A, leaving vig B alone, with vig B choosing not to kill anyone.

Uh... My brain is hurting again... The chances of this are... slim?? I mean the natural timing of the thing is more likely isn't it? Confused
_________________
Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
sAbLLimINal
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 4:04 am    Post subject: 296 Reply with quote

If there is a vig in the game, the best strategy is to not shoot night 1 and only shoot when they are sure that person is scum. That is, of course, if the vig has the option to not shoot.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lamont_Cranston
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 4:41 am    Post subject: 297 Reply with quote

sAbLLimINal wrote:
If there is a vig in the game, the best strategy is to not shoot night 1 and only shoot when they are sure that person is scum. That is, of course, if the vig has the option to not shoot.

SK would be the only other option.
_________________
Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Courk
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 4:57 am    Post subject: 298 Reply with quote

Lamont_Cranston wrote:
Uh... My brain is hurting again... The chances of this are... slim?? I mean the natural timing of the thing is more likely isn't it? Confused


What's more likely:
1. Someone choosing the smart play as a vig and just not killing someone, while the mafia have something like an 85% chance of *not* targeting the vig.
2. Mafia having ~ 15% chance of blocking the only other killing role night 1, and doing so successfully.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
Courk
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:00 am    Post subject: 299 Reply with quote

Meant to add that those figures are heavily rounded just to give the general idea, since more precise figures require knowing how many mafia there are and how many people were alive going into night 1 -- something I'm a bit too lazy to do right now.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
Lamont_Cranston
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 6:34 am    Post subject: 300 Reply with quote

Courk wrote:
Lamont_Cranston wrote:
Uh... My brain is hurting again... The chances of this are... slim?? I mean the natural timing of the thing is more likely isn't it? Confused


What's more likely:
1. Someone choosing the smart play as a vig and just not killing someone, while the mafia have something like an 85% chance of *not* targeting the vig.
2. Mafia having ~ 15% chance of blocking the only other killing role night 1, and doing so successfully.

Ouch brain still hurting...

So then we would have to be looking at a complete freak of timing OR MNO is lying?? I think we need to focus on who MNO's scum buddy is because how are we going to prove he's lying?
_________________
Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
MNOWAX
0.999... of a Troll



PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 6:41 am    Post subject: 301 Reply with quote

heres the deal if you believe that I am a cop lamont, then you MUST believe that there is a roleblocker, because i was definitely blocked last night

it isnt all that complicated actually, lamont, i think youre just posting to stay active, while not actually posting anything. SCUM RADAR GOING OFF EVEN MORE!

Confirm Vote: lamont

_________________
The Man The Myth The Legend
MNOWAX
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Lamont_Cranston
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 8:11 am    Post subject: 302 Reply with quote

Look here MNO, I believe your claim. Its Courk that is bringing up the lack of a roleblocker not me. I'm only asking her to explain her theory.
_________________
Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Courk
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 9:34 am    Post subject: 303 Reply with quote

I am not trying to say there isn't a roleblocker, I'm just saying the roleblocker didn't necessarily target a killer on night 1.

FOS: Lamont

This feels like you're trying to spin something against me, saying I think there's no roleblocker when I've said no such thing, much like Zag did.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
Lamont_Cranston
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 10:20 am    Post subject: 304 Reply with quote

Well, with that out of the way, what is your point? I'm still trying to figure out what you are trying to say... Confused
_________________
Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Courk
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 11:17 am    Post subject: 305 Reply with quote

Imagine this is the set-up:

Player A - maf
Player B - maf & roleblocker
Player C - vig/SK
Player D - townie
Player E - townie
Player F - townie
Player G - townie
Player H - townie
Player I - townie
Player J - townie


MNOWAX is saying that since no one extra died on night 1, we know the roleblocker blocked the person with the extra kill.

He's saying that:
A targeted D
B blocked C
C targeted E, but was unsuccessful due to being blocked

What I'm saying is that since a vig, if given the option, would not target anyone night 1, it's also possible that:

A targeted D
B blocked E
C targeted no one

Which means the blocker did NOT necessarily block the person with the extra kill.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
sAbLLimINal
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 4:48 pm    Post subject: 306 Reply with quote

Unless I bring up the mismason theory again and say that there is no vig and the masons recruited wrong. I'm fairly sure there isn't a SK or else this game would be over.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MNOWAX
0.999... of a Troll



PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 4:51 pm    Post subject: 307 Reply with quote

ok i gotcha courk

my issue is lamont. has been since this day started. hes scum.

lynch his ass.
_________________
The Man The Myth The Legend
MNOWAX
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Zag
Tired of his old title



PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:16 pm    Post subject: 308 Reply with quote

Honestly, I think this whole mismason theory is hogwash. Masons that recruit sound like overkill for a game this small. Also, the mason died on the first night, so he wouldn't have had a chance to recruit, would he?

More and more, I find Courk's insistence on her "vig chose not to kill on night 1" rather suspicious. Not that the theory doesn't seem plausible, it does, it's just that she is pushing it so freaking hard that it seems like she is hiding something. It seems to me that, considering how much thought she has given it, her NOT mentioning the other possible explanations* is suspicious. It seems to me that she is pushing this one so hard for a reason.

And anyway, she's currently voting for me, so I don't see much downside of ticking her off. Enthusiastic Grin vote: Courk

* There are two other possible explanations that Courk hasn't bothered to mention:
1. Poisonium died on night 1 at the hands of the SK / vig, and the mafia kill was blocked by a doctor.
2. The SK / vig and the mafia BOTH attacked poor Poisonium, making him twice as dead.

If #1 is true, then the mafia know that we have a doctor, which would explain MNO surviving the night last night. On the other hand, they might just fear that we have a doctor, but not actually know.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Zag
Tired of his old title



PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:32 pm    Post subject: 309 Reply with quote

MNOWAX wrote:
my issue is lamont. has been since this day started. hes scum.

lynch his ass.

I have to admit that I've been suspicious of him, too, but I can't quite put my finger on why. (Probably because he was such a jerk about accusing me when he first started.)

Anyway, I'd like to understand, MNO, what your reasons are, other than your little trap, which I don't give any credence to at all (since I would have done the same thing he did -- vote for whomever you pointed at). What other evidence do you have? I'm very willing to be convinced, here, but I'm not, yet.

And all this time we have talked about creative, who is really shadowfox, and equally as AWOL / lurking as cm was. I had him on the bottom of my FoS list, but his current lurkiness is moving him up.

Well, that's the whole of my FoS list. I've decided, for better or worse, to believe MNO's cophood, though I'll be laughing almost as much as sAb when we find out he was a naive cop all along, and Loki/sAb is really scum after all, thus vindicating my earlier suspicions. Extreme Delectation
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Zag
Tired of his old title



PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:33 pm    Post subject: 310 Reply with quote

Crud, can't edit.

When I said "that's the whole of my FoS list," I meant including the post before that one.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
sAbLLimINal
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:33 pm    Post subject: 311 Reply with quote

Quote:
Honestly, I think this whole mismason theory is hogwash. Masons that recruit sound like overkill for a game this small. Also, the mason died on the first night, so he wouldn't have had a chance to recruit, would he?

I do agree recruiting in a game this small shouldn't happen, but it's possible. And you're forgetting that Snicklac16 was a mason, so he could have recruited.

Quote:
More and more, I find Courk's insistence on her "vig chose not to kill on night 1" rather suspicious. Not that the theory doesn't seem plausible, it does, it's just that she is pushing it so freaking hard that it seems like she is hiding something. It seems to me that, considering how much thought she has given it, her NOT mentioning the other possible explanations* is suspicious. It seems to me that she is pushing this one so hard for a reason.

It's like a golden rule that vigs never, ever shoot night 1. Since this is your first game, I guess you just didn't know that.

Quote:
* There are two other possible explanations that Courk hasn't bothered to mention:
1. Poisonium died on night 1 at the hands of the SK / vig, and the mafia kill was blocked by a doctor.
2. The SK / vig and the mafia BOTH attacked poor Poisonium, making him twice as dead.

These theories can be both true, unless I bring up the mason theory again (sorry lol Razz )

Quote:
If #1 is true, then the mafia know that we have a doctor, which would explain MNO surviving the night last night. On the other hand, they might just fear that we have a doctor, but not actually know.

I'm not sure about this. If the mason theory is wrong, then the mafia and vig didn't shoot MNO (unless there's an outside party, like a killer), that means nobody targeted MNO last night. Maybe the mafia targeted MNO night 1 and the doc saved him, but I find that really unlikely.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sAbLLimINal
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:37 pm    Post subject: 312 Reply with quote

gah, I'm sorry Zag, i misread your post and repeated exactly what you said. But yeah, I still find that really unlikely.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
MNOWAX
0.999... of a Troll



PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 7:41 pm    Post subject: 313 Reply with quote

Lamont_Cranston wrote:
Gimmee a sec MNO, I'm still thinking here... Shocked


Lamont_Cranston wrote:
Sorry, I had a really bad day at work yesterday and just woke up. I need to come up with some analysis that applies to the new game situation. Working on it.


Lamont_Cranston wrote:
Well I can say I definitely agree with Courk's analysis of the situation. Sorry, another crappy day at work... Melancholy

I'm really tired. I need to get off my butt and make a list. Embarassed


Lamont_Cranston wrote:
I'm waiting for Sab to come back. I wanna hear what he has to say...


Hes talking but not really saying anything. i think he is just stalling and not giving much info while keeping the game active.

the post that he does give some information or anything ...
Lamont_Cranston wrote:
Well, excellent analysis post (I mean the fact you posted it far more than the content Wink )

So you're saying that me & Courk are scum buddies? Well I can understand that... I definitely see Courk as pro-town and have supported her as such throughout the game.

The following people are cleared town: Loki & MNO

That leaves the following people as potential scum: Courk, CreativeSab, Zag, Lamont

Now, CreativeSab has done nothing this whole game but lurk except for D1. On D1 he: Voted Wall_E (town) & voted MNO (town). After this he just drops off the radar. Now the question is, who is his scum buddy?

This leaves Courk or Zag...

I'm definitely leaning Zag but I am conflicted because of MNO's read on Zag and his respoonse when "claimed" scum by MNO...

I think a CreativeSab lynch will clear this up... Almost Fonz Cool

Vote CreativeSab


just is nothing more of rehash of what everyone else has said. not very town like. that plus my trap, means i think hes scum. Lynch his ass.
_________________
The Man The Myth The Legend
MNOWAX
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Lamont_Cranston
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 8:08 pm    Post subject: 314 Reply with quote

sAbLLimINal wrote:
It's like a golden rule that vigs never, ever shoot night 1. Since this is your first game, I guess you just didn't know that.

This is not necessarily true. Believe it or not, I have met people online that are strong advocates of N1 vigging. I can provide two specific examples of people offsite who have said so with links.

@MNO: Your "trap" was total crap and everyone here can see that. Your the dang town Cop and Zag should of been voted by everyone, except this game has such a huge lurking factor nobody else probably even saw your supposed "trap". 9.9

I've posted my views. I think Creative is the scum buddy of either Courk or Zag. I think he is the safest lynch but one thing is for sure: We must lynch correctly here and NL is not an option.
_________________
Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Lamont_Cranston
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 8:18 pm    Post subject: 315 Reply with quote

Btw, there is no way that Courk is the correct lynch here. We should focus on who her scum buddy might be.
_________________
Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Zag
Tired of his old title



PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 8:26 pm    Post subject: 316 Reply with quote

Lamont_Cranston wrote:
Btw, there is no way that Courk is the correct lynch here. We should focus on who her scum buddy might be.


Sorry, why do you say that? With all her obfuscation about the vig/sk and role-blocker, I'm thinking that she is one of those, probably the role-blocker.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Courk
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 9:43 pm    Post subject: 317 Reply with quote

I'm not pressing the it-could-be-a-blocked-townie-with-a-vig-that-chose-not-to-kill thing. Lamont kept not getting it, so I had to keep repeating it so he could understand.

The only point I was trying to get across was that the roleblocker didn't necessarily block the second killer. And that was mostly in response to MNOWAX.

The fact that Lamont is the one who kept making me repeat myself, and that Zag then spun that into me being "insistent" makes me think they're scum buddies. unvote: zag, vote: lamont
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
Zag
Tired of his old title



PostPosted: Tue Jun 30, 2009 10:01 pm    Post subject: 318 Reply with quote

Baah. This is just a ploy to get some distance between the two of you, trusting that I'd be afraid the be the hammer once again, and hoping that shadowfox will be AWOL long enough that someone else will retract their vote

But screw that -- your ploy doesn't work! This is my chance to redeem myself for the first-day lynching, and be the hero once again! (or else to be the complete goat and hand the win over to the mafia, but I don't think so, anymore).

Vote: Lamont That's 4
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Poisonium
annoyed by the old



PostPosted: Thu Jul 02, 2009 11:45 pm    Post subject: 319 Reply with quote

Zag wrote:
It seems to me that, considering how much th* There are two other possible explanations that Courk hasn't bothered to mention:
1. Poisonium died on night 1 at the hands of the SK / vig, and the mafia kill was blocked by a doctor.
2. The SK / vig and the mafia BOTH attacked poor Poisonium, making him twice as dead.


*rises from grave*
*seeks revenge*
_________________
I tried apt-get install lifebut it only returned E: Couldn't find package life
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos



PostPosted: Fri Jul 03, 2009 1:42 pm    Post subject: 320 Reply with quote

Day 3


Well the third day of our ordeal started out with a bang as MNOWAX accused Zag of being a rat. But it seemed this was only a trap to draw additional suspects. It seemed to work too as Lamon_Cranston became more aggitated and disoriented. Eventually it was determined that It was best he was killed so we crossed our fingers and strung him. As we chocked him he seemed to lose his grip on reality and began to laugh, a cold chilling laugh. "You mice should have treated me better, for I Sela the Fox gave Cluny his way in soon you will all perish." She laughed harder as we tighntened the noose out of panic and the old gypsy finally died. After examining her room we found plenty of sleeping draughts that we guessed she had used to preven tany heroic action at night. One enemy down, but how many were left. We decided with the poisoner dead it might be best to go to sleep and see what the night brought. As I crawled into bed the vision of poor poisonium came to my eyes but I cleared my mind and went to sleep. THE DEAD SHOULD REMAIN DEAD!

Lamont_Cranston is lynched. He was Sela the Vixen the mafia roleblocker. Please send in all night choices by Tuesday Morning.
_________________
The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Display posts from previous: by   
Reply to topic    The Grey Labyrinth Forum Index -> Mafia Games All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next
Page 8 of 10

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Site Design by Wx3