| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
ralphmerridew
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 5:02 pm Post subject: 201 |
|
|
| Unfortunately, the game was pre-crash, and I can't find back archives. (Though JDTAY ended up getting lynched day one in that game as well.) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
raekuul
Lives under a bridge & tells stories.
|
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 5:50 pm Post subject: 202 |
|
|
Oh. So, it's lost forever.
Well, so much for that, then. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ralphmerridew
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Fri Feb 12, 2010 11:55 am Post subject: 203 |
|
|
| Will be away from computer for a few days. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Quailman
His Postmajesty
|
Posted: Fri Feb 12, 2010 5:41 pm Post subject: 204 |
|
|
Since day broke, everyone has posted, but most only once. I'm not counting the seven or so recent posts that discussed a deceased person's role in another mafia game. Only three people are voting.
Vote, people. This is Mafia. We lynch people.
Though I don't see why JDTAY made his unusual claim (someone with that role would vote for him for certain, adding to the likelihood of a lynch), I can sort of see why he backed raekuul's claim. And I can better accept raekuul's claim now that I know there is at least one plain townie. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
raekuul
Lives under a bridge & tells stories.
|
Posted: Fri Feb 12, 2010 6:19 pm Post subject: 205 |
|
|
| I'm going to vote: Zag to try and get a claim. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot
|
Posted: Fri Feb 12, 2010 7:09 pm Post subject: 206 |
|
|
I will state that I am a townie. (Of course, I would say that if it were true or not, so I don't expect you to believe it on my say so.) I will also state that I am not vanilla, but I'm not going to claim my ability, even if you get me up to L-1. I was going to give some limited information about it, but I realized that that would lead to guessing at it. In order to forestall the obvious, I will NOT answer any questions about it, even ones that are so far off that denying them will not give any real information. (If you only tell people when they are getting cold, and you're silent when they are getting warmer, it's as much as telling them both.)
I feel that there are a number of people who are a lot more suspicious than I, based on voting record. Really, what else do you have to go on? I've made some accusations, based on the only observable facts. If you find those accusations suspicious, well, it probably because they were too close to the mark and you aren't really working for the town.
To Recap everything I've said so far:
.
Day 1
Unlike you others, I believed JDTAY's claim. It didn't seem that farfetched to me.
I found MNO's voting record to be suspicious, because it was. Next in line for suspicious voting records (counting the final hammer) are Amb and raekuul.
Day 2
I speculated as to why the mafia would kill MNO. (I'm assuming that's how he died, but there's always the possibility of a vigilante and the mafia got blocked. I hadn't considered that until now.) From the mafia's point of view, I thought it was a foolish choice, since I believe that he was the most likely to get lynched on day 2. I went on to speculate why they might have realized this, but decided to kill him anyway, and I found it pointed a mild suspicion at Amb. It wouldn't have been enough to convince me if I weren't already suspicious of Amb because of his hammer of JDTAY.
So that's it. If you want to lynch me over lack of claim, i won't try to stop you. That is, I'm not going to claim, no matter what. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
raekuul
Lives under a bridge & tells stories.
|
Posted: Fri Feb 12, 2010 7:21 pm Post subject: 207 |
|
|
| Well, it would be bad of me to not unvote to a claim like that. I see no reason at present to disbelieve the not-claim. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
raekuul
Lives under a bridge & tells stories.
|
Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 6:24 pm Post subject: 208 |
|
|
| Why is it that the mafia games on the IWBTG forums go so much faster than the games here? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Amb
Amb the Hitched.
|
Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 6:54 pm Post subject: 209 |
|
|
| It's because participation has dropped, and also we have very little info at the moment. It will work like a pressure cooker later. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Poisonium
annoyed by the old
|
Posted: Sat Feb 13, 2010 7:51 pm Post subject: 210 |
|
|
I still don't believe Raekuul. In fact, I believe him so little, that...
Vote: Raekuul _________________ I tried apt-get install lifebut it only returned E: Couldn't find package life |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sAbLLimINal
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 2:09 am Post subject: 211 |
|
|
| Zag wrote: |
| Then I would have been arguing that I was right all along, and you people should have listened to me |
.
I don't think it's a good idea to say that if you're right we should be listening to you, unless you claimed and no one else argued that claim. We should be deciding on our own and not just sticking to the person who happened to be right because that person may just very well be scum.
| Amb wrote: |
| I didnt have a strong feeling over Raekuul anymore. I switched votes to make sure he didnt get deadline lynched. |
This could very well just be a lie. If Amb and raekuul are scum then Amb of course wouldn't want raekuul lynched. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sAbLLimINal
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 2:12 am Post subject: 212 |
|
|
| me wrote: |
| I don't think it's a good idea to say that if you're right we should be listening to you, unless you claimed and no one else argued that claim. We should be deciding on our own and not just sticking to the person who happened to be right because that person may just very well be scum. |
Alright I realized that might be interpreted the wrong way. What I meant was that we shouldn't be following your actions (following the leader if you get what I mean). Of course we should be listening to you because that's part of the game. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot
|
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 2:19 am Post subject: 213 |
|
|
| Funny you should say that, since you're interpreting my words the wrong way. The bit of mine you are quoting was me saying that the mafia would expect me to be saying this, not that I necessarily would be saying it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sAbLLimINal
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sun Feb 14, 2010 3:52 am Post subject: 214 |
|
|
| Zag wrote: |
| Funny you should say that, since you're interpreting my words the wrong way. The bit of mine you are quoting was me saying that the mafia would expect me to be saying this, not that I necessarily would be saying it. |
Ok, well sorry for misreading that, but that's what I saw. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
raekuul
Lives under a bridge & tells stories.
|
Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 12:32 pm Post subject: 215 |
|
|
I'd like some action. If we keep stalling, we're going to end up with a deadlined no-lynch.
(*Bird-that-was-there-all-along whispers into his ear*)
And that would be bad. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos
|
Posted: Mon Feb 15, 2010 8:05 pm Post subject: 216 |
|
|
ScumNot Amb-O-meter
1. Undercover Monk- got to be honest I have not been on my game this time, and for that I apologize. The only thing of note I have done was lead the secondary push for the JDTAY lynch. So I guess at least a 5/10
2. Zag- Still to early to get a sense of his usual style but his attacks on Amb and his reasoning behind a MNO night kill are odd. Definately smart enough to be a good mafia. hmmmmm.... 7/10
4. raekuul- as usual contriversy surrounds raekuul early. Almost lynched ut saved by an Amb vote switch. more suspicious than innocent but still middle of the road on his alliances. 6/10
5. Courk- Not posting enough. But no real complaints either. 3/10
6. ralphmerridew- I remember feeling suspicious of you on one my read-thrughs but cant remember why right now. 6/10
7. Amb- I don't think his hammer was that suspicious we had two candidates he chose JDTAY. and I have liked what hes had to say this game. 4/10..... but jumps to 9/10 if raekuul is found to be scum.
8. sAbLLImiNal- not enough impact on the game as of yet but for some reason Im more worried about him than Courk. 5/10
9. milkshake- interesting game play from the milkshake but I think hes good for now. 4/10
11. Quailman- trying to keep conversation going and has made several good comments. Probably the strongest town vibe right now. 2/10
12. Poisonium- same with Courk. 3/10
thats my quick thoughts on all players without read-through which I may or may not have tie to do later tonight. :discuss: _________________ The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
raekuul
Lives under a bridge & tells stories.
|
Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 2:10 am Post subject: 217 |
|
|
By your reasoning, we should lynch Zag today, me tomorrow, and then...
Well, if for some reason I were to come up as a scum, then Amb would be lynched on day... 5? I've lost count already... yeah, Zag on day 2, me on day 3, and Amb on day 4.
But if Amb's more scummy than I am if I'm revealed to be scum, then wouldn't Amb also be the greater threat by your analysis? Would it really be wise to leave the greater maybe-threat alive while dealing with the obvious choice?
For that matter, why am I not higher up on the scum-o-meter? You and Amb seem to agree that I'm not as suspicious as everyone else thinks, care to back that up?
And now I've confused myself again. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot
|
Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 4:16 am Post subject: 218 |
|
|
Pretty much every time you post, you go up in suspicion in my ranking, raekuul.
I have trouble understanding why I am considered suspicious for finding the first day hammer to be suspicious. But, frankly, I want to see something happen, so let's all put our cards on the table. I still find Amb to be the most suspicious, and he's been pointing the finger at me. So I think everyone should take sides. At least, this way, if you people lynch me, then when you find me to be a townie, you'll go ahead and lynch Amb tomorrow.
Confirm vote: Amb |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
raekuul
Lives under a bridge & tells stories.
|
Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 12:41 pm Post subject: 219 |
|
|
| I'm gonna follow UM on this one. vote: Zag |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot
|
Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 12:58 pm Post subject: 220 |
|
|
| I'm becoming more and more convinced that Amb and raekuul are scum buddies. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
raekuul
Lives under a bridge & tells stories.
|
Posted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 10:55 pm Post subject: 221 |
|
|
...do we really want to let a deadline pass again?
Also, UM, should I keep my vote on Zag, or do you have a re-evaluation to post sometime this month? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos
|
Posted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 11:14 pm Post subject: 222 |
|
|
My main problem with Zag is that if anyone laid the hammer it was me. I basically begged someone to switch. Of course Zag could be right and Amb was just an opportunistic scum. However Amb is way to smart IMHO to pull off a newb move like that.
Zag seems like he is justing jumping on the easy kill to avoid a thought out lynch.
Vote: zag _________________ The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot
|
Posted: Wed Feb 17, 2010 11:36 pm Post subject: 223 |
|
|
| Undercover Monk wrote: |
| However Amb is way to [sic] smart IMHO to pull off a newb move like that. |
Or maybe he's even smarter than that, and knows that you know that he knows it's a newb move.
It's funny that you accuse me of not thinking things out. I posted a very long and (IMHO) well-thought-out analysis of whom I suspected and why. It included probably an hour of writing down all the voting patterns, including not just whom a person voted for, but what number vote it was on the target. (IMO, this is extremely telling.)
Perhaps it was too long for you to bother reading it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos
|
Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 9:11 pm Post subject: 224 |
|
|
or perhaps it is too long ago for me to remember it.
seriously i just dont buy the Amb hammer thing. If you have something else well thats different. and arguing that Amb knows people will think that about him, while possible, is only WIFOM. I will go take a look at your post analysis but if memory serves me your top suspect was MNOWAX.
Also day 1 vote analysis are rarely helpful as there is a lot of Bs'ing going on. it is hard to seperate the random votes from the ral strategy votes if there are any. I'm not trying to insult your intelligence. Just not onboard for a Amb vote....Yet! _________________ The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot
|
Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 9:59 pm Post subject: 225 |
|
|
There were three different things that I found suspicious about Amb. I agree that no one of them would be enough for a vote, but it's all I have to offer.
1. General suspicious voting on day 1. (However, I agree with your point below.) He wasn't the worst offender -- MNO was, IMHO -- but he was up there.
2. Hammer on day 1, especially moving off of raekuul, who is looking more and more suspicious to me every time he says anything. If they were scum buddies and he had made the vote to distance, then he would HAVE to move off and threaten someone else, in spite of how suspicious it might look.
3. (And I agree that this is really weak), The scum killed MNOWAX (I'm assuming that's who did it). So I was looking for who might have any sort of motive to kill MNO. He was, at the time, pointing the finger at Amb, which gives Amb a small amount of motive.
Again, it's nothing huge, but it's three little somethings, I think, making it better than a completely random guess.
| Undercover Monk wrote: |
| Also day 1 vote analysis are rarely helpful as there is a lot of Bs'ing going on. it is hard to seperate the random votes from the ral strategy votes if there are any. |
I agree with this, but what else do we have to go on at this point? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
raekuul
Lives under a bridge & tells stories.
|
Posted: Thu Feb 18, 2010 10:38 pm Post subject: 226 |
|
|
Not much, really.
And I look suspicious to you every time I blink, Zag. At least I didn't claim Swiss Army Townie, that would have probably been the worst thing I could have done. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Amb
Amb the Hitched.
|
Posted: Fri Feb 19, 2010 7:02 pm Post subject: 227 |
|
|
SOrry I havent had much time to post. I have been reading the game though. There isn't that much to go on yet.
I may as well address Zag's three points.
| Quote: |
| 1. General suspicious voting on day 1. (However, I agree with your point below.) He wasn't the worst offender -- MNO was, IMHO -- but he was up there. |
Yup, day 1 behaviour. Nothing to go on. Any vote on day 1 can be suspect.
| Quote: |
| 2. Hammer on day 1, especially moving off of raekuul, who is looking more and more suspicious to me every time he says anything. If they were scum buddies and he had made the vote to distance, then he would HAVE to move off and threaten someone else, in spite of how suspicious it might look. |
Actually it would be stupid of a mafiaete to defend a buddy like that on day 1. It would attract cop attention. Mafia would generally let their buddy hang to self preserve. I know enough about this game to know even your whole gang hangs but you remain innocent enough - you still win.
My vote change was a gut feeling that we would gain far more info from JDTAY's death than Raekuul. Also I felt Raekuul is far more likely to accidentally give away info if he was mafia. To me he was the natural cop target. (Note, I AM NOT asking for a cop to out a result)
| Quote: |
3. (And I agree that this is really weak), The scum killed MNOWAX (I'm assuming that's who did it). So I was looking for who might have any sort of motive to kill MNO. He was, at the time, pointing the finger at Amb, which gives Amb a small amount of motive.
|
Actually I like this logic for another reason. That generally IS my motive as mafia - eliminate the threats first. Any one who has played with me in a mafia team will know this - and they may have done that deliberately. So that might help me in my processing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Poisonium
annoyed by the old
|
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 3:52 pm Post subject: 228 |
|
|
| Zag wrote: |
Pretty much every time you post, you go up in suspicion in my ranking, raekuul.
I have trouble understanding why I am considered suspicious for finding the first day hammer to be suspicious. But, frankly, I want to see something happen, so let's all put our cards on the table. I still find Amb to be the most suspicious, and he's been pointing the finger at me. So I think everyone should take sides. At least, this way, if you people lynch me, then when you find me to be a townie, you'll go ahead and lynch Amb tomorrow. |
I agree that the vote would be suspicious if Raekuul indeed turns out be mafia, which I believe he is. Hence, I also naturally suspect Amb. However, it's also a completely comprehensible move for a townie. _________________ I tried apt-get install lifebut it only returned E: Couldn't find package life |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Poisonium
annoyed by the old
|
Posted: Sat Feb 20, 2010 3:58 pm Post subject: 229 |
|
|
| Quote: |
Actually it would be stupid of a mafiaete to defend a buddy like that on day 1. It would attract cop attention. Mafia would generally let their buddy hang to self preserve. I know enough about this game to know even your whole gang hangs but you remain innocent enough - you still win.
My vote change was a gut feeling that we would gain far more info from JDTAY's death than Raekuul. Also I felt Raekuul is far more likely to accidentally give away info if he was mafia. To me he was the natural cop target. (Note, I AM NOT asking for a cop to out a result) |
Now, this is just moving into WIFOM area I think. It is however possible for you to make that vote and still look innocent, as you point out yourself. Hence, while it probably wouldn't be the most intelligent move around, it's perfectly viable to do it. Now, I'm a kind of mafia who's usually very anxious of lynching my mates, and I suspect Amb plays somewhat similarly, and thus, I doubt he actually off a fellow scum lynch. So my suspicion on Amb stays low for the time being. _________________ I tried apt-get install lifebut it only returned E: Couldn't find package life |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sAbLLimINal
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 5:45 am Post subject: 230 |
|
|
Could we have a vote count?
Here's my opinion: I think a raekuul lynch is the best lynch today because 1) we are getting rid of someone who is highly suspicious 2) it will more info on Amb. We haven't gotten anywhere lately and IIRC raekuul claimed vanilla townie so he's not much of a loss as compared to someone who claims he has some sort of role. That doesn't mean I think Zag is town, but I believe raekuul would be the smartest lynch. Frankly I just want to get somewhere and I don't think talking about WIFOM helps.
Vote: raekuul |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Quailman
His Postmajesty
|
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 4:04 pm Post subject: 231 |
|
|
| I don't know. I was highly suspicious of Raekuul, but since JDTAY's role was the same as his claim, I'm more willing to accept it. I think Zag's our best bet today. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos
|
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 4:07 pm Post subject: 232 |
|
|
agreed with the added note that sAbLLimINal last post was, I think, incrediably scummy. Lets just vote off a claimed towniee to get information. No you lynch the most suspicious. Which in this case I believe is zag. _________________ The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos
|
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 4:07 pm Post subject: 233 |
|
|
Oh and TGC could we get a vote count please. _________________ The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Poisonium
annoyed by the old
|
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 8:45 pm Post subject: 234 |
|
|
On rereading the original Day 2 posting by the mod, I'm inclined to
Unvote: Raekuul
The reasoning for this is not relevant right now. I assume you can accept that. _________________ I tried apt-get install lifebut it only returned E: Couldn't find package life |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
raekuul
Lives under a bridge & tells stories.
|
Posted: Sun Feb 21, 2010 11:18 pm Post subject: 235 |
|
|
| When will it become relevant? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Amb
Amb the Hitched.
|
Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 7:24 pm Post subject: 236 |
|
|
| When will the mod return? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
raekuul
Lives under a bridge & tells stories.
|
Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 8:51 pm Post subject: 237 |
|
|
| Apparently when Pois' reasoning becomes relevant. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos
|
Posted: Tue Feb 23, 2010 10:01 pm Post subject: 238 |
|
|
oh crap nuggets TGC why would you abbandon us _________________ The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Poisonium
annoyed by the old
|
Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 3:42 pm Post subject: 239 |
|
|
| raekuul wrote: |
| When will it become relevant? |
Once we begin massclaiming. _________________ I tried apt-get install lifebut it only returned E: Couldn't find package life |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
raekuul
Lives under a bridge & tells stories.
|
Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2010 5:44 pm Post subject: 240 |
|
|
Oh where, oh where has our moderator gone? Oh where, oh where could he be?
Also, I will Unvote just in case a deadline is established retroactively. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|