|
|
|
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Chaz
Vote: Zag
|
Posted: Wed Sep 08, 2010 9:07 pm Post subject: 1 |
|
|
Rules are simple.
Post a clue/question that can be solved, but cannot be Googled.
1. How did Big Jeans die? (90's movie trivia.) _________________ The enemy's base is down. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chaz
Vote: Zag
|
Posted: Wed Sep 08, 2010 9:09 pm Post subject: 2 |
|
|
Oh. You can take a turn if you either know the answer, or can Google it.
Either way, you defeat the question and get to pose your own. _________________ The enemy's base is down. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jack_Ian
Big Endian
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2010 1:07 am Post subject: 3 |
|
|
Nice Idea! Took me about 7 minutes.
| This Search in the fifth entry flixter.com (walking and talking) wrote: |
| all the while Amelia's cat Big Jeans is dying of cancer |
| script-o-rama wrote: |
Um, Laura. Big Jeans, uh... Big Jeans is dead.
She jumped out the window. |
What famous photographer took this picture:
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Tired of his old title
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2010 1:49 am Post subject: 4 |
|
|
Too easy! You should have downloaded the image and re-hosted it somewhere. Took me under a minute. Google of "56366 site:vam.ac.uk" gets it in one try.
[Don McCullin] http://www.vam.ac.uk/images/image/56366-popup.html
What is this?
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jbvntx
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2010 2:42 am Post subject: 5 |
|
|
Is it mathgrant waiting for a newbie to post a perfectly reasonable puzzle on grey labyrinth? _________________ jbv |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antrax
ESL Student
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2010 6:47 am Post subject: 6 |
|
|
I have the picture in a book I read as a kid so I know what it is, but I think jbvntx' is better than the actual answer. _________________ After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sixleggedspider
Icarian Member
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2010 10:00 am Post subject: 7 |
|
|
| jbvntx wrote: |
| Is it mathgrant waiting for a newbie to post a perfectly reasonable puzzle on grey labyrinth? |
lol - careful - that comment may not have a unique answer?
and thanks  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chaz
Vote: Zag
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2010 5:36 pm Post subject: 8 |
|
|
Hmmmm... I specifically said you couldn't Google it, but I never really defined what that meant.
Images defeated: http://www.gazopa.com/
Using that, I can answer the question, but does it count? I couldn't have possibly Googled that, but I did use Google to find the app that could defeat the question.
Ultimately, I wanted a puzzle thread that required posters to *know* the answer, without any possibility that they cheated and searched for it, so I'm deciding that it counts.
Zag can veto, but I think the spirit of the thread is maintained. =D
Next question:
Who knows [...]? (Hint: Not Bo Jackson.) _________________ The enemy's base is down. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Tired of his old title
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2010 5:42 pm Post subject: 9 |
|
|
Oh. I thought it was supposed to be a Google challenge, rather than truly un-Google-able. i.e. "I bet you can't Google this" as opposed to "You're not allowed to."
Of course, if someone simply knows the answer, they should be welcome to answer it. And joke answers like jbv's don't count (though it was a good joke). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chaz
Vote: Zag
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2010 6:04 pm Post subject: 10 |
|
|
I realized that as I was about to post the answer to your question (not allowed to vs not able to.)
My original intent of this thread was to find challenges that could not be simply defeated via web resources. Something that you could post anywhere, and it would be a challenge to decipher.
I probably should have made that clear in the first post huh?  _________________ The enemy's base is down. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
*duh*
Guest
|
Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2010 11:05 pm Post subject: 11 |
|
|
| Zag wrote: |
What is this?
 |
An image.
That was easy. Took me less than 1 second.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Tired of his old title
|
Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2010 5:09 pm Post subject: 12 |
|
|
| Chaz wrote: |
| My original intent of this thread was to find challenges that could not be simply defeated via web resources. Something that you could post anywhere, and it would be a challenge to decipher. |
Sorry, I misunderstood. It's your thread, so you should feel free to define the game as you like. However, I rather liked the game I thought you were starting, and I thought your example was a great one. (That is, it is something that is very hard to Google successfully because it only uses words that are far more common in another context.)
In fact, I was hoping to come up with something like that, but couldn't and had to resort to using an image. I considered that to be a step down from your example. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chaz
Vote: Zag
|
Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2010 9:56 pm Post subject: 13 |
|
|
I don't disagree at all.
I just like the idea that someone can't cheat (though they're welcome to try.)
It makes every challenge twice as challenging. One challenge to make a puzzle that can't be solved by cheating, and one challenge to solve the puzzle even when you don't know the answer. =D _________________ The enemy's base is down. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ralphmerridew
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sat Sep 11, 2010 1:54 pm Post subject: 14 |
|
|
| Female anglerfish? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chaz
Vote: Zag
|
Posted: Sun Sep 19, 2010 3:01 pm Post subject: 15 |
|
|
My clue clearly needs a hint.
Who Knows ...
Hint: Detective. _________________ The enemy's base is down. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Tired of his old title
|
Posted: Sun Sep 19, 2010 4:01 pm Post subject: 16 |
|
|
| ralphmerridew wrote: |
| Female anglerfish? |
It's an Austrailian Dragonfish, from here. If you use Chaz's image search tool that he linked above, it is the first result (of hundreds of identical images out there!)
I'd move on to Chaz's puzzle, if I had a clue. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
LordKinbote
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2010 1:50 am Post subject: 17 |
|
|
| Chaz wrote: |
My clue clearly needs a hint.
Who Knows ...
Hint: Detective. |
Actually it didn't. I'm guessing The Shadow knows.
There are a lot of neat questions out there that are not questions that can be googled, and I definitely feel this is a game worth playing, but "who knows" as a question is probably so vague that it almost sucks the fun out of the guessing. It's a bit like asking someone to guess a tune but you only give them the first two notes. On the other hand, "who knows" is *almost* Googlable. I went to "Google Instant" and searched "who knows what" and my answer was a predicted search.
I don't want to change your intent, but I see this being successful in one of two ways.
1. The questions are full, unambiguous questions that truly cannot be Googled. They require some sort of insight that only the human mind can produce.
2. The questions are full, unambiguous questions, that actually can be found on the internet, but it takes some seriously savvy Google-fu to produce worthwhile results. Personally, I find Google hunts really fun. Anyone who spent any time playing "The Stone" or its offshoot "The Scarecrow's Field" probably came to love searching randomly on Google, then hate it, then love it again.
But this is your game, and you're free to do whatever you want with it, and because we love to game here, we'll probably follow whatever rules that you want to impose upon us.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
LordKinbote
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2010 1:56 am Post subject: 18 |
|
|
Anyway, here's my attempt at a (real-life!) question that is probably semi-Googlable, but probably does require some insight.
My wife today was getting me caught up on her life (she's been out of town for a few weeks doing a family practice medical rotation).
"My cousin who lives in Ohio really wants me to apply to the residency program in Toledo. Oh, and your mother has inspired me to try and make a guacamole dip."
"Are you deliberately trying to tie your separate conversation strands together with a theme?" I asked.
Because she is my wife, and knows how I think, she knew exactly what I meant. Do you? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chaz
Vote: Zag
|
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2010 4:43 am Post subject: 19 |
|
|
| LordKinbote wrote: |
| Chaz wrote: |
My clue clearly needs a hint.
Who Knows ...
Hint: Detective. |
Actually it didn't. I'm guessing The Shadow knows.
There are a lot of neat questions out there that are not questions that can be googled, and I definitely feel this is a game worth playing, but "who knows" as a question is probably so vague that it almost sucks the fun out of the guessing. It's a bit like asking someone to guess a tune but you only give them the first two notes. On the other hand, "who knows" is *almost* Googlable. I went to "Google Instant" and searched "who knows what" and my answer was a predicted search.
I don't want to change your intent, but I see this being successful in one of two ways.
1. The questions are full, unambiguous questions that truly cannot be Googled. They require some sort of insight that only the human mind can produce.
2. The questions are full, unambiguous questions, that actually can be found on the internet, but it takes some seriously savvy Google-fu to produce worthwhile results. Personally, I find Google hunts really fun. Anyone who spent any time playing "The Stone" or its offshoot "The Scarecrow's Field" probably came to love searching randomly on Google, then hate it, then love it again.
But this is your game, and you're free to do whatever you want with it, and because we love to game here, we'll probably follow whatever rules that you want to impose upon us.  |
Heh. Yes indeed. I was going to put "Who Knows What [something] [something] in the [something] of [something]."
But I tried typing "who knows what" in google, and the answer was right there. My original puzzle would have been more solvable, but the real trick was keeping google from solving it.
I think my initial intent of the thread was two fold. Solving a puzzle that requires either insight or mad google skills, and creating a puzzle that requires someone to have either insight or even better google skills than you do (since you didn't think it could be googled.) (and by googled I mean that it can't be solved using the Internet, as Zag so quickly helped me discover.
My "who knows" puzzle was based on someone actually posting that particular puzzle on facebook, and my solving it. I was accused of cheating, but I pointed out that it could not have been googled. "Who Knows" was not enough information to find the answer, and google instant didn't exist at the time.
The other puzzle I submitted was part of a contest I was involved in. I was able to crack all of the questions (mostly just because I'm an 80's movie addict), but that was the one question I could not find an answer to.
[edit to add]
So yeah... I'm hoping that we can find some puzzles that it your first criteria, and I imagine will have a blast with the ones that fall into the second criteria. I would also like to get an idea or what makes puzzles ungoogleable. Maybe we can make a competition out of it someday. _________________ The enemy's base is down. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chaz
Vote: Zag
|
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2010 4:08 pm Post subject: 20 |
|
|
| LordKinbote wrote: |
Anyway, here's my attempt at a (real-life!) question that is probably semi-Googlable, but probably does require some insight.
My wife today was getting me caught up on her life (she's been out of town for a few weeks doing a family practice medical rotation).
"My cousin who lives in Ohio really wants me to apply to the residency program in Toledo. Oh, and your mother has inspired me to try and make a guacamole dip."
"Are you deliberately trying to tie your separate conversation strands together with a theme?" I asked.
Because she is my wife, and knows how I think, she knew exactly what I meant. Do you? |
Holy Toledo Ohio? =D _________________ The enemy's base is down. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
LordKinbote
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2010 4:21 pm Post subject: 21 |
|
|
| Chaz wrote: |
Holy Toledo Ohio? =D |
Yup, both Toledo and guacamole can be preceded by "holy". |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
LordKinbote
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2010 4:26 pm Post subject: 22 |
|
|
| Chaz wrote: |
My "who knows" puzzle was based on someone actually posting that particular puzzle on facebook, and my solving it. I was accused of cheating, but I pointed out that it could not have been googled. "Who Knows" was not enough information to find the answer, and google instant didn't exist at the time. |
I think puzzles should be created so that people can solve them, not so that people can't. If someone solves your puzzle (the general "you") and your first response is "You cheated!" then you obviously thought it was a puzzle that couldn't be solved without a hint...and therefore flawed.
Part of my personal criteria for a good puzzle is that people know both when they're right and when they're done. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jack_Ian
Big Endian
|
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2010 8:51 pm Post subject: 23 |
|
|
There was a whole thread dedicated to a particular form of such puzzles not too long ago.
It was quite popular and there are still a few unsolved.
Here's one that you would probably just have to know.
What game is this from?
I donated a lot of my pocket-money to it.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chaz
Vote: Zag
|
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2010 9:18 pm Post subject: 24 |
|
|
| LordKinbote wrote: |
| Chaz wrote: |
Holy Toledo Ohio? =D |
Yup, both Toledo and guacamole can be preceded by "holy". |
Holy crap; that was serendipitous...
I thought the link was the fact that "Toledo Oh" was part of the sentence (thus linking the two sentences together.) I only said the "holy" part because I was being silly.
| LK wrote: |
| I think puzzles should be created so that people can solve them, not so that people can't. If someone solves your puzzle (the general "you") and your first response is "You cheated!" then you obviously thought it was a puzzle that couldn't be solved without a hint...and therefore flawed. |
Sorry, maybe I was unclear. Other people thought I had cheated, but it was a nostalgic (inside info) puzzle, and there wasn't any way I could have cheated. I had an unfair advantage (of having heard that person say "the shadow knows" whenever he heard someone say "who knows") however, and I do see your point. _________________ The enemy's base is down. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chaz
Vote: Zag
|
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2010 9:32 pm Post subject: 25 |
|
|
Really, I want to find puzzles which cannot be googled, but can be solved. (which really puts my first two puzzles as terrible examples, since neither could be solved without some pretty exclusive info.)
Could such a puzzle ever exist?
"Paladin Is Messing With My Mind" comes very close to this, but it would fail if it were to ever become popular.
I want to see a puzzle which has the following three criteria:
1. Can be "told."
2. Cannot be answered without the person answering having to solve the puzzle or have been given the answer by someone else.
3. Can be solved without requiring uncommon information (like mine did).
Actually... I want to see lots of puzzles that fit this criteria, but I'll settle for one for now. _________________ The enemy's base is down. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
L'lanmal
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2010 10:04 pm Post subject: 26 |
|
|
| Chaz wrote: |
Really, I want to find puzzles which cannot be googled, but can be solved. (which really puts my first two puzzles as terrible examples, since neither could be solved without some pretty exclusive info.)
Could such a puzzle ever exist? |
So basically, you are looking for an unpublished puzzle? Certainly they exist, but the ones discussed here usually are answered by someone, which then becomes Googleable.
Edit: The GenCon puzzle hunt several years ago contained a puzzle requiring identification of vials by smell. A new puzzle of that type is not only currently ungoogleable, but presents serious remote-solving difficulties. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chaz
Vote: Zag
|
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2010 10:33 pm Post subject: 27 |
|
|
| L'lanmal wrote: |
| Chaz wrote: |
Really, I want to find puzzles which cannot be googled, but can be solved. (which really puts my first two puzzles as terrible examples, since neither could be solved without some pretty exclusive info.)
Could such a puzzle ever exist? |
So basically, you are looking for an unpublished puzzle? Certainly they exist, but the ones discussed here usually are answered by someone, which then becomes Googleable.
Edit: The GenCon puzzle hunt several years ago contained a puzzle requiring identification of vials by smell. A new puzzle of that type is not only currently ungoogleable, but presents serious remote-solving difficulties. |
I want a puzzle that cannot be googled even if it's published.
As for the smell puzzles, I like the idea, but my first criteria (intentionally) excludes them (because of the difficulties with remote-solving.) _________________ The enemy's base is down. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Tired of his old title
|
Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 1:36 am Post subject: 28 |
|
|
| The question depends somewhat on your definition of puzzle. For instance, a flash program that generates a maze, and the solution is the path through it. That certainly can't be googled -- it's a new maze every time. Similarly, the solution to Sudoku games, etc. can not be googled (though you could, of course, google a Sudoku solver). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
LordKinbote
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 2:07 am Post subject: 29 |
|
|
| Zag wrote: |
| The question depends somewhat on your definition of puzzle. For instance, a flash program that generates a maze, and the solution is the path through it. That certainly can't be googled -- it's a new maze every time. Similarly, the solution to Sudoku games, etc. can not be googled (though you could, of course, google a Sudoku solver). |
I'd argue that those can't be "told" though. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chaz
Vote: Zag
|
Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 2:55 am Post subject: 30 |
|
|
| LordKinbote wrote: |
| Zag wrote: |
| The question depends somewhat on your definition of puzzle. For instance, a flash program that generates a maze, and the solution is the path through it. That certainly can't be googled -- it's a new maze every time. Similarly, the solution to Sudoku games, etc. can not be googled (though you could, of course, google a Sudoku solver). |
I'd argue that those can't be "told" though. |
Exactly that.
Chess Puzzles, IT, Quickies, 3x3's... These are all puzzles which are likely to be ungoogleable (since they're highly customizable), but they all flat against the "can be told" part.
I'm starting to be convinced that a puzzle can't be constructed by my definition (since any words can be google, and we use words to "tell" the riddle.)
"Who Knows" is a good example of a puzzle that can't be googled. At the very least, you would need to add the word "what" in order to get google to cooperate, but, if it became a popular puzzle/riddle, throwing the word "puzzle" or "riddle" in the search would defeat it easily. =D
Jack_Ian's current puzzle is a pretty good one... what about using sound effects in the puzzle--this becomes problematic as a facebook post, unless we translate the sound effects to text, and then google defeats us again? What about using only words that google won't search for? _________________ The enemy's base is down. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chaz
Vote: Zag
|
Posted: Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:10 am Post subject: 31 |
|
|
| Jack_Ian wrote: |
There was a whole thread dedicated to a particular form of such puzzles not too long ago.
It was quite popular and there are still a few unsolved.
Here's one that you would probably just have to know.
What game is this from?
I donated a lot of my pocket-money to it.  |
At first I though Space Invaders, then I thought Galaxia. But I went and played both, and neither sounded right.
I played a lot of video games, though, so I'll come up with the answer. =D _________________ The enemy's base is down. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Persona
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Wed Sep 22, 2010 8:43 pm Post subject: 32 |
|
|
| You can also pose a puzzle where every important word is a stop word. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chaz
Vote: Zag
|
Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 6:49 pm Post subject: 33 |
|
|
What is this? Or... Where can I buy one of these?
 _________________ The enemy's base is down. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jack_Ian
Big Endian
|
Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 7:32 pm Post subject: 34 |
|
|
| Jack_Ian wrote: |
What game is this from?
I donated a lot of my pocket-money to it.  |
Answer:. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chaz
Vote: Zag
|
Posted: Wed Oct 13, 2010 9:21 pm Post subject: 35 |
|
|
Sorry. =D
I don't know the answer to my question. I really want to know where I can get one (for a wedding present.)
As for you question... :. _________________ The enemy's base is down. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
L'lanmal
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Thu Oct 14, 2010 10:04 pm Post subject: 36 |
|
|
You seem to be taking a rather strict view of "can be told". I would hold that sudokus or chess positions are quite describable in words. Some time ago (before they were all catalogued), Freecell games would be similar in that you could supply the seed verbally and anyone could load that game on a windows PC.
On the other hand, even if you use all terms that Google typically excludes from their search, wouldn't you still be able to search for those by treating the entire sentence as a single string? Perhaps not on Google, but another engine?
Here are some puzzles that I would argue fail the "can be told" condition, but it sounds like they would meet your thoughts on it.
1) This one is probably easily Googlable once indexed:
Xx xxx xxx xxxx xx xxxxx, xx xxx xxx xxxxx xx xxxxx, xx xxx xxx xxx xx xxxxxx, xx xxx xxx xxx xx xxxxxxxxxxx, xx xx xxx xxxxx xx xxxxxx, xx xxx xxx xxxxx xx xxxxxxxxxxx, xx xxx xxx xxxxxx xx Xxxxx, xx xxx xxx xxxxxx xx Xxxxxxxx, xx xxx xxx xxxxxx xx xxxx, xx xxx xxx xxxxxx xx xxxxxxx, xx xxx xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxx xx, xx xxx xxxxxxx xxxxx xx, xx xxxx xxx xxxxx xxxxxx xx Xxxxxx, xx xxxx xxx xxxxx xxxxxx xxx xxxxx xxx--xx xxxxx, xxx xxxxxx xxx xx xxx xxxx xxx xxxxxxx xxxxxx, xxxx xxxx xx xxx xxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxx xx xxx xxxxx xxxxxxx, xxx xxxx xx xxx xxxx, xx xxx xxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxx xx xxxxxxxxxx xxxx.
2) I would no longer know how to Google this one... Google does not seem to be taking kindly to symbol searches these days:
What does the blank represent?:
*^&_%#)(
And here are some other types of puzzles which are somewhat Google Resistant.
3)
Today's word is "Take".
(Comment: This is a "Word of the day" puzzle, based on the word of the day puzzle sig someone had from long ago. In this style puzzle, the answer remains the same, but the clues change as time goes by, which makes it difficult to Google without knowing the answer already. On Friday, I could supply a second word, but I would not know what that word is until Friday.)
4) Any puzzle where the solver / process of solving plays a role in determining what the answer is. The variants on the presumably easily Googlable "crossed/uncrossed" puzzle would fit in this catagory. As would the "Cauldron" style of puzzle (where the solvers determine the clues). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hitchhiker
Finally got a ride.
|
Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 3:02 am Post subject: 37 |
|
|
Original situation puzzles (sometimes called lateral thinking puzzles) are basically ungooglable. (Like LordKinbote's story about his wife). ones that you heard somewhere are almost certainly googlable with some effort.
Here's one: why did somebody steal a beach chair in the middle of winter? (true story)
Sound clips that have been re-hosted to disguise their origin work as well as picture puzzles. Using them creatively; that's the fun part. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
LordKinbote
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 6:25 am Post subject: 38 |
|
|
| Got L'lanmal's first two, no Googling necessary. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
L'lanmal
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Fri Oct 15, 2010 10:32 am Post subject: 39 |
|
|
| For the record, today's word is "Restart". |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jack_Ian
Big Endian
|
Posted: Tue Nov 09, 2010 4:21 am Post subject: 40 |
|
|
I was trying to remember another word for a card-dealer. It sounded French.
In the end I just remembered before I could find the word I was looking for. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|