|
|
|
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Lucresia
Sheds Titles
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2011 4:48 am Post subject: 41 |
|
|
Vote Count #3:
4 Amb (Ctorj, MNOWAX, Zag, itisally)
3 Sentran (Durryn, Sniklac16, Amb)
1 ctorj (Quailman)
1 Durryn (raekuul)
1 Jedo (Sentran)
Not voting: Lifeinmomland, Silverfire, Jedo the Jedi, RubberDuck
8 to Lynch! _________________ "And All anybody knows, is you're not like them" -Elliott Smith |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Durryn
Doghouse Dweller
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2011 5:11 am Post subject: 42 |
|
|
I have read 16 games including the last one ( Heroes ) I have to admit the odds of catching scum day one appear to be about ...... 72% against.
If you can get lucky enough to grab one right off the trend seems to hold and Town wins, other wise it appears to be about 50/50......
As anyone we choose is as good/bad as another right now.........
Unvote; Vote Amb _________________ If there's anything around here more important than my ego, I want it caught and shot now! - Zaphod Beeblebrox |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sentran
Ray of Sucking Funshine
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2011 5:17 am Post subject: 43 |
|
|
What the heck, when logic fails, OMGUS!
Unvote, Vote: Amb _________________ Sentran
"Speaking of double negatives, I haven't read greylab yet today." - Lifeinmomland |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RubberDuck
You're the one
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2011 5:34 am Post subject: 44 |
|
|
I think today's day one takes the cake over the last one.
Vote: Amb
For trying to logically confuse a confusingly logical day vote. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Amb
Amb the Hitched.
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2011 5:57 am Post subject: 45 |
|
|
Wow 7 votes. So shall we end the day here and now, and go without any useful information into night? I dont think so. Sure we dont want a two-week day, but rushing the first day? At the very least you want to give your town power roles something to analyse so they can make their choices.
Regarding my FOS on Jedo, it was clearly meant to be MNOWAX. I just transposed in the name of my mafia partner by accident. Nothing critical at all. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lifeinmomland
Soccer, dance, doctor's appt. this AM.
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2011 6:03 am Post subject: 46 |
|
|
oh dear. AMB seems to be in trouble. Me thinks it might be some hidden aggression for giving us all fits last game ...
Hmmm... who shall I vote for?
I believe I will land my vote on ... TRICKSY HOBBIT!!!!!
(VOTE SENTRAN) _________________ Who is John Gult? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RubberDuck
You're the one
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2011 6:25 am Post subject: 47 |
|
|
Hahaha, I didnt even count them. Lucky that wasn't number 8 Amb
Unvote:Amb |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RubberDuck
You're the one
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2011 6:27 am Post subject: 48 |
|
|
| Amb wrote: |
Regarding my FOS on Jedo, it was clearly meant to be MNOWAX. I just transposed in the name of my mafia partner by accident. Nothing critical at all. |
I can't tell if you're just being sarcastic, or trying to use sarcasm to cover the fact that you and MNO really are partners. I do think that merits a Fos:Amb |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Amb
Amb the Hitched.
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2011 7:36 am Post subject: 49 |
|
|
| Stretching beyond your elasticity there duck? Maybe I was too hasty in removing my vote from you. But at least you did unvote me. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Tired of his old title
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2011 12:04 pm Post subject: 50 |
|
|
Whoa! I jump in this morning and see the quick run up -- nearly a lynch. Of those last few, Sentran's looks to me as if he is trying too hard to give a reason, when the real reason was 'lynch a townie.'
unvote Amb, vote Sentran |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
raekuul
Lives under a bridge & tells stories.
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2011 1:10 pm Post subject: 51 |
|
|
Oh, please. It's still day one. Everything anyone does or does not say or do is a scumtell.
If anyone gets my vote or FoS at this point, it's MNOWAX for, in his own words, voting Amb on Principle. unvote, FOS: MNOWAX |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lucresia
Sheds Titles
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2011 1:51 pm Post subject: 52 |
|
|
Vote Count #4:
5 Amb (Ctorj, MNOWAX, itisally, Durryn, Sentran)
4 Sentran (Zag, Lifeinmomland, Sniklac16, Amb)
1 Ctorj (Quailman)
Not voting: raekuul, Silverfire, Jedo the Jedi, RubberDuck
8 to Lynch! _________________ "And All anybody knows, is you're not like them" -Elliott Smith |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sentran
Ray of Sucking Funshine
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2011 3:34 pm Post subject: 53 |
|
|
I could unvote, but now I'm wondering why my vote more than everyone else's is being scrutinized enough to start a bandwagon on me. I'm happy with mine for the time being. _________________ Sentran
"Speaking of double negatives, I haven't read greylab yet today." - Lifeinmomland |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ctorj
Did I spell that right?
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2011 3:41 pm Post subject: 54 |
|
|
Wow. I leave the game for 24 hours and this happens??
unvote
Clearly, we have a scum or 2 on that quick lynch.
FOS: RubberDuck, Sentran & Durryn At least one of these guys are scum. In the end game, I will requote this and say
| The Awesome Ctorj wrote: |
| See??? I was right!!! |
Just a preview of things to come.
vote: RubberDuck for putting someone at L-1 with no real information on Page 2 of Day 1. _________________ "Love is the absolute expression of the human perfection" -Me!
Created by MyFitnessPal.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lifeinmomland
Soccer, dance, doctor's appt. this AM.
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2011 4:03 pm Post subject: 55 |
|
|
So... everyone is doing the random day 1 stuff... and ZAG decides an OMGUS vote is trying to hard? Really? I am thinking this is a case of pot/kettle. I second that puh-lease!
If I had asked the closest scum to raise their hand so I would know who to vote for... Zag would have been it. I do not dismiss the timing of Sentran's vote... but gosh... it is day one, and I keep getting told random non-sequitur in the name of the game for voting day 1.
| Zag wrote: |
Whoa! I jump in this morning and see the quick run up -- nearly a lynch. Of those last few, Sentran's looks to me as if he is trying too hard to give a reason, when the real reason was 'lynch a townie.'
unvote Amb, vote Sentran |
FOS SENTRAN
UNVOTE
VOTE ZAG  _________________ Who is John Gult? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sniklac16
Spaciest of aides
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2011 4:31 pm Post subject: 56 |
|
|
Dammit ctorj beat me to it haha oh well im going to unvote vote rubberduck for the same reason ctorj stated  _________________ What lies behind us and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to what lies within us. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Amb
Amb the Hitched.
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2011 8:28 pm Post subject: 57 |
|
|
Im going to specify my FOS on Rduck a bit more
"Hahaha, I didnt even count them. Lucky that wasn't number 8 Amb "
The implication of ducks statement quoted here, is that he was going to bandwagon completely. No hint of a real joke, but a quick pile on. Had he been the 8th, he'd have hammered and had a good cover story the next day. The problem I have is that as town: He wasnt interested enough in finding scum. As scum: He had very good reason to behave like he did - following the town - following the flow, and it might have been a very good excuse tomorrow. If we are to lynch a townie by error, then getting rid of one who flagrantly avoids trying is a good reason. Especially when the odds are higher of not being town.
Now to contradict myself. RD in heroes mafia behaved like scum. He used his night ability like scum. He flagrantly lied about it, and hinted at a scumrole (the puppetmaster) who could be doing it. And didnt really contribute that much to the final result. So that really does make it hard to predict his role. I suspect Duck plays more to see how far he gets rather than finding the actual scum.
Zag said: "I'm pretty sure he was kidding, but he deserves to swing for it, anyway." I could apply very similar reasons to the above. Lynching for lynchings sake would achieve nothing. Why? Because you can't learn about relationships with other players if you are too hasty. If you lynch me now, you can now gain a lot more: eg LifeInMomLand's distancing from the events, Ctorjs apparent reaction, Sentran retaining his vote etc. So in the end it's worked out, but it wouldnt have had RD's rushed reaction been the 8th. All that valuable info would have been lost.
Unvote Sentran
There isnt enough on him to merit him swinging.
Vote Rubberduck
I expect him to lie even if he is town at the moment. So im not totally sure if I just want him under pressure to claim, or simply to swing. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sentran
Ray of Sucking Funshine
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2011 9:04 pm Post subject: 58 |
|
|
That's more like it. Now that my OMGUS vote is pointless...
Unvote
I'm not sure which direction to go from here, so I'll just wait and see what happens. Day 1 lynches always yield more information in retrospect anyway. _________________ Sentran
"Speaking of double negatives, I haven't read greylab yet today." - Lifeinmomland |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2011 9:18 pm Post subject: 59 |
|
|
Creating multiple choice tests is stupid. Is there a quick way to do it?
Anyway, I'll throw in that the wagon on Amb was ridiculous. Had I been on earlier when it first started, I gladly would have thrown my vote on there, but I would have paid attention to the number of votes on him and I would have been calling for a claim around L-2. That was poorly handled, and I'm sure scum fed. I believe Amb is likely town at this point (though leave it to Amb to play that off in the same cool manner even if he is scum).
As for my vote, I see the arguments for both Sentran and Duck. They are totally reasonable and even plausible at that. However, I'm going with Mom by voting for Zag. Her post is strange to me, but I think she's on the money. Zag voted Amb for a poor reason, and clarified by making it half serious. Then he turns on Sentran "trying too hard to give a reason," which is actually what his vote feels like to me. Let's see where this goes.
vote Zag _________________ Paragon Tally: 18 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Amb
Amb the Hitched.
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2011 9:32 pm Post subject: 60 |
|
|
If I was able to day vig (I cant) and forced to do so right now (obviously not the case): Id be hard-pressed to pick between Zag and RubberDuck. But RD's vote was far more careless, and generally scum are more careless when voting. I'd expect a town member to actually realise that the were casting L-1 and react that way. I'd expect a scum to push it quickly and make out not realising.
Yes I am aware that if it were that easy this game would be a walk in the park. But still... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Tired of his old title
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2011 9:37 pm Post subject: 61 |
|
|
Let me be more precise in my reasoning. My vote on Amb was only mildly serious, and mostly a joke, and it only brought him to 3 votes. Then I came back only a few hours later and he is at 7 votes! (Actually, back down to 6 by the time I posted, but, reading in chronological order, I was surprised.)
With 4 quick votes, I thought, surely one of them, at least, is scum. They were (in order) itisally, Durryn, Sentran, RubberDuck. I looked at those and asked myself which of them sounds the most phony, the most like a scum trying to see an early bandwagon turn into a lynching. Of the four, I thought Sentran's post sounded the most false. I hardly feel confidant about it, but it seems like the most likely choice, to me. Also, my record for finding scum on day one is horrendous, so I don't have much faith in this choice; it's just all I got. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2011 9:39 pm Post subject: 62 |
|
|
On the other hand, my record is pretty decent. I think I'll stick where I'm at.  _________________ Paragon Tally: 18 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Tired of his old title
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2011 9:47 pm Post subject: 63 |
|
|
| Jedo the Jedi wrote: |
On the other hand, my record is pretty decent. I think I'll stick where I'm at.  |
On the lynch all liars policy, we should lynch you for that one.
*Does some research*
Ok. In the last two games in which you were not scum, you are 1 and 1. I guess that's pretty good. I got tired of looking at that point. Unfortunately, you are wrong on this one, but I have a reason for not arguing too terribly much about it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2011 9:51 pm Post subject: 64 |
|
|
I overlooked the "on day one" part. I didn't mean to overstate my scum-hunting prowess. _________________ Paragon Tally: 18 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RubberDuck
You're the one
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2011 10:45 pm Post subject: 65 |
|
|
RME
Actually I did not suggest the puppetmaster role in heroes mafia, stop twisting things to make it look like i'm in behaving a certain way.
Past game this, past game that. This is not a past game. This is this game. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RubberDuck
You're the one
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2011 10:50 pm Post subject: 66 |
|
|
| Obviously, I have a pet hate for past game references. If you couldn't tell. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lucresia
Sheds Titles
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2011 11:14 pm Post subject: 67 |
|
|
Vote Count #5:
3 Amb (MNOWAX, itisally, Durryn)
3 Rubberduck (Ctorj, Sniklac16, Amb)
2 Zag (Lifeinmomland, Jedo the Jedi)
1 Sentran (Zag)
1 Ctorj (Quailman)
Not voting: Sentran , raekuul, Silverfire, RubberDuck
8 to Lynch! _________________ "And All anybody knows, is you're not like them" -Elliott Smith |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
RubberDuck
You're the one
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2011 11:29 pm Post subject: 68 |
|
|
| RubberDuck wrote: |
| Amb wrote: |
Regarding my FOS on Jedo, it was clearly meant to be MNOWAX. I just transposed in the name of my mafia partner by accident. Nothing critical at all. |
I can't tell if you're just being sarcastic, or trying to use sarcasm to cover the fact that you and MNO really are partners. I do think that merits a Fos:Amb |
Obviously he wouldn't make a joke like this if he were really mafia, thats what most people would think, but wouldn't that make it the perfect cover if he were mafia? Which is why I made the above statement. Amb responed with
| Amb wrote: |
| Stretching beyond your elasticity there duck? Maybe I was too hasty in removing my vote from you. But at least you did unvote me. |
He waits a while, then pulls out the big hammer on me, even though I was the first to unvote him, which he could have done immediately, but that would look suspect, so he waited a while and then this counter:
| Amb wrote: |
Im going to specify my FOS on Rduck a bit more
"Hahaha, I didnt even count them. Lucky that wasn't number 8 Amb "
The implication of ducks statement quoted here, is that he was going to bandwagon completely. No hint of a real joke, but a quick pile on. Had he been the 8th, he'd have hammered and had a good cover story the next day. The problem I have is that as town: He wasnt interested enough in finding scum. As scum: He had very good reason to behave like he did - following the town - following the flow, and it might have been a very good excuse tomorrow. If we are to lynch a townie by error, then getting rid of one who flagrantly avoids trying is a good reason. Especially when the odds are higher of not being town.
Now to contradict myself. RD in heroes mafia behaved like scum. He used his night ability like scum. He flagrantly lied about it, and hinted at a scumrole (the puppetmaster) who could be doing it. And didnt really contribute that much to the final result. So that really does make it hard to predict his role. I suspect Duck plays more to see how far he gets rather than finding the actual scum.
Zag said: "I'm pretty sure he was kidding, but he deserves to swing for it, anyway." I could apply very similar reasons to the above. Lynching for lynchings sake would achieve nothing. Why? Because you can't learn about relationships with other players if you are too hasty. If you lynch me now, you can now gain a lot more: eg LifeInMomLand's distancing from the events, Ctorjs apparent reaction, Sentran retaining his vote etc. So in the end it's worked out, but it wouldnt have had RD's rushed reaction been the 8th. All that valuable info would have been lost.
Unvote Sentran
There isnt enough on him to merit him swinging.
Vote Rubberduck
I expect him to lie even if he is town at the moment. So im not totally sure if I just want him under pressure to claim, or simply to swing. |
He claims he is specifying a fos, but promptly votes me using info from a previous game he modded. This has ruined the integrity of the game IMO, as he is trying to create the pre-disposition that I lie as a townie, that I don't try and catch scum, and "plays more to see how far he gets rather than finding the actual scum."
I'm tempted to vote him again for the timed delay in his counter argument, and for trying to give everyone the impression that I'm a pathological liar that doesn't try and catch scum in mafia games.
Amb has put me in quite a foul mood as I can forsee this "pre-disposition" preventing me from playing in future mafia games. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sentran
Ray of Sucking Funshine
|
Posted: Tue May 24, 2011 11:56 pm Post subject: 69 |
|
|
| RubberDuck wrote: |
| Amb has put me in quite a foul mood as I can forsee this "pre-disposition" preventing me from playing in future mafia games. |
I understand your frustration, really I do. Lifeinmomland has suggested more than once that I take a break from Mafia games because some players frustrate me beyond what is reasonable for a posting forum game. Due to this, I read GL almost first thing in the morning, then go have my morning cup of coffee, then come back and write what I consider to be a reasonable and rational response. Yes, what you see is usually after multiple edits. You would be shocked at what is written and erased before I ever hit submit.
RD, don't let Amb get you down. Take a step back if you need to, but don't quit because someone angers you. That just lets the aggravating players become the majority . Oh, and at the chance of angering you for referring to a past game, I wanted to let you know that I PM'd Amb during the vote-change fiasco last game and told him "You, sir, are a bastard, and I applaud you." It just occurred to me that you should have been the recipient of that comment, so there you go. _________________ Sentran
"Speaking of double negatives, I haven't read greylab yet today." - Lifeinmomland |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
itisally
Master of Disguise
|
Posted: Wed May 25, 2011 1:39 am Post subject: 70 |
|
|
Well at least we have some real conversations now. Nothing useful happens on day one untill someone id POd I fully admit that for me the bandwagon on Amb was just to get the ball rolling. That being said, I too was suprised to get on today and see him at L-1. SO unvote
After that I am not sure what to make of it. Zag and Sentran have lots to say and that makes them easy targets. But I haven't seen anything that really bothered me.
Rubberduck was careless; is that really a scum tell? I am not sure. But it could have ended badly. Also he tries to use time delay as a reason for suspicion rather than acknowledging the time it takes to develop a reasonable response.
For now fos: Rubberduck
off topic: Jedo, There are some freeware test makers online you can download. I haven't tried any as my school provides us with one. _________________ I could agree with you, but then we would both be wrong. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Wed May 25, 2011 3:04 am Post subject: 71 |
|
|
Duck, in all seriousness and somewhat off-topic, I know you don't like the use of past-game information (henceforth known as "meta"), but it is useful. It's just like learning a person's personality, thus in some way we see certain people have tendencies. I bandwagon all the time, so if I don't, it's likely something is different. I know these things can lead to WIFOM (and that's its own mess), but psychologically speaking people are going to slip back into that comfortable way of playing given enough time. So, meta is useful.
Now, usually there is something in the rules along the lines of "don't take anything personally." It's a good rule because people are going to be sneaky and under-handed, especially if they are scum, especially if scum is Amb. He was so wriggly in Soprano's Mafia and had so much ad hominem that it didn't seem likely we would succeed in lynching him. This went so far as to cause me to second-guess myself and my ability to be logical. Post-game, he told me I actually had done a good job but the town wasn't listening to me.
(somewhat back on-topic) What you have pointed out could potentially be Amb being scum and trying to paint you. Go with that. It's reasonable. I don't really see it, but I have seen him (and Sentran) do that before and it's a good tactic. _________________ Paragon Tally: 18 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lucresia
Sheds Titles
|
Posted: Wed May 25, 2011 4:17 am Post subject: 72 |
|
|
Thanks Jedo,
Rule 10 has been amended to include this.
10.) Do not play against your win condition and do not take anything personally. For all you know it might be part of their role...and have fun! _________________ "And All anybody knows, is you're not like them" -Elliott Smith |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lifeinmomland
Soccer, dance, doctor's appt. this AM.
|
Posted: Wed May 25, 2011 7:33 am Post subject: 73 |
|
|
Hey, RD. Go for a car ride, and rip AMB a new one, there in your car all by yourself. It helps me. You wouldn't BELIEVE the stuff I yell at Sentran when I am driving alone.  _________________ Who is John Gult? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ctorj
Did I spell that right?
|
Posted: Wed May 25, 2011 12:09 pm Post subject: 74 |
|
|
| Lucresia wrote: |
Thanks Jedo,
Rule 10 has been amended to include this.
10.) Do not play against your win condition and do not take anything personally. For all you know it might be part of their role...and have fun! |
You can't do it! None of you can make me have fun!! I won't do it!! No!!!!!!!!
[As men in white uniforms drag Ctorj in a van that will take him to Happy land...] _________________ "Love is the absolute expression of the human perfection" -Me!
Created by MyFitnessPal.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Silverfire
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Wed May 25, 2011 2:04 pm Post subject: 75 |
|
|
Hmmm. . . Durryn was fifth on the Amb bandwagon but has largely escaped notice. This was his reasoning:
| Durryn wrote: |
| I have to admit the odds of catching scum day one appear to be about ...... 72% against. [...] As anyone we choose is as good/bad as another right now......... |
He said that any day one victim is as good as another, then voted for someone with four votes already. This looks to me like a classic "trying to end the day quickly" scumtell. I admit it's quite possibly a newbie mistake, but I still think it warrants a Vote: Durryn. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Durryn
Doghouse Dweller
|
Posted: Wed May 25, 2011 5:24 pm Post subject: 76 |
|
|
Woot, I got a vote!!!! Hold on, that's a bad thing
I honestly must say I was just following the trend. I have no idea who to vote for as I can't make heads or tails out of most of the so called "scum tells"
Sneezing on the sabbath, eye rolls at bad puns, being 3rd to vote for some one, or in my case 5th?. It's all a little confusing for me.
That said Unvote
No FOS
Crud!!!! Just watching and learning, aka Lurking, is a scum tell too!!!!!!
LOL, Even after all the previous game I have read I still don't get these tells [/b][/dice] _________________ If there's anything around here more important than my ego, I want it caught and shot now! - Zaphod Beeblebrox |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
itisally
Master of Disguise
|
Posted: Wed May 25, 2011 6:25 pm Post subject: 77 |
|
|
Silverfire said
| Quote: |
| This looks to me like a classic "trying to end the day quickly" scumtell. I admit it's quite possibly a newbie mistake, but I still think it warrants a Vote: Durryn. |
I think I disagree with this. Day one is build on bandwagons getting a people talking. Being 5th is hardly a rush to completion, it is just over halfway! And at that point there hadn't been any talking yet so it seems reasonable to push a bandwagon a little further. It seems that the arguments were more appropriate against those closer to the hammer.
I think these are the reasons most of us ignored it, as well as some wiggle room for the newb. Although it may be that the scum was distracting us with arguments about other people. _________________ I could agree with you, but then we would both be wrong. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos
|
Posted: Wed May 25, 2011 6:47 pm Post subject: 78 |
|
|
| Durryn wrote: |
I have read 16 games including the last one ( Heroes ) I have to admit the odds of catching scum day one appear to be about ...... 72% against.
|
except if Im playing of course. I must say its fun to just be watching for a bit and not have the stress of actually playing I needed a break. I will melt back into the woodwork now pardon the intrusion. _________________ The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sentran
Ray of Sucking Funshine
|
Posted: Wed May 25, 2011 9:08 pm Post subject: 79 |
|
|
In the interest of keeping conversation going, I decided to do an impromptu post count for the game. I only bothered with those playing the game (Sorry UM). I feel that it's easy for the scum to hide in the background on day one and then join random townie bandwagons until one sticks.
8: Amb
7: Ctorj, Durryn
6: RubberDuck
5: Jedo the Jedi, Zag
4: itisally, raekuul
3: Lifeinmomland
2: Quailman, Sniklac16
1: MNOWAX, Silverfire
When you add in that Silverfire was also the last person to post in the thread, it makes her look pretty lurky to me. FOS: Silverfire
Of course, as I'm sure others will point out, this is completely self-serving. I am a very talkative person. In fact, this is my 13th post this game. _________________ Sentran
"Speaking of double negatives, I haven't read greylab yet today." - Lifeinmomland |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Amb
Amb the Hitched.
|
Posted: Wed May 25, 2011 10:23 pm Post subject: 80 |
|
|
The town gathered around the non playing UM, and wreaked vengeance on his body. He was well hung.
No wait...
Congratulations town you have lynched a parasite. A poster who should have signed up.
But seriously, the post counts at the moment arent any more indicative than my logic or anyone elses. This is day 1, and any jump saying XYZ is definitely scum is wrong. I think you can only go on probablities at the moment. Right now I think youd be better to map clear relationships. Whether I like it or not I have a clear link to Rubberduck. Whether I like it or not I have never till now mentioned Durryn or Itsally. That would be infinitely far more useful later on when people are dead. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|