| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Icarus
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2011 9:57 pm Post subject: 1 |
|
|
Let's see how short lived this one will be
235, 245, 250, 237, 246, ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Icarus
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 2:53 pm Post subject: 2 |
|
|
| Wow. Almost 2 days and not one guess. I guess this was a bit tougher than I thought it would be. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Suspence
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 3:12 pm Post subject: 3 |
|
|
I looked at it and couldn't come up with anything, but I've always been terrible at these. _________________ I hate people who try to write interesting things in their signature. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Icarus
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 9:02 pm Post subject: 4 |
|
|
| If you know where to look, you will see I gave a hint in my previous post. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jack_Ian
Big Endian
|
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:50 pm Post subject: 5 |
|
|
| 238? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antrax
ESL Student
|
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:56 pm Post subject: 6 |
|
|
I got 235 via mumbo-jumbo. _________________ After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Tired of his old title
|
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 2:03 pm Post subject: 7 |
|
|
I was going to post my speculations, but they clearly aren't it, so I'll save the idea and post a different sequence when this one is complete. For yours, I haven't the foggiest.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Icarus
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 2:30 pm Post subject: 8 |
|
|
| Antrax wrote: |
| I got 235 via mumbo-jumbo. |
You are correct - per mumbo-jumbo.
Just to see, what would the pattern have been if we started with 117? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Tired of his old title
|
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 3:56 pm Post subject: 9 |
|
|
I still have no clue on the mumbo-jumbo, but here's a new sequence. What's next?
53, 303, 103, 75, 119, 192, ...
Oh, good. It's not in the integer sequence encyclopedia. Maybe I'll complete the list and add it when we're done. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jack_Ian
Big Endian
|
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 10:13 pm Post subject: 10 |
|
|
| Icarus wrote: |
| 235, 245, 250, 237, 246, ? |
Well I tried displaying them in binary and noticed that they were bit-rolled. Unfortunately the sequence broke between 250 & 237. The break still seemed to follow the pattern though and further predicted another break after 246. Unfortunately, and not surprisingly given my tenuous reasoning, I was wrong.
I also tried treating them as octal numbers, but to no avail.
Any other hints? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Icarus
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 10:19 pm Post subject: 11 |
|
|
| Jack_Ian wrote: |
| Icarus wrote: |
| 235, 245, 250, 237, 246, ? |
Well I tried displaying them in binary and noticed that they were bit-rolled. Unfortunately the sequence broke between 250 & 237. The break still seemed to follow the pattern though and further predicted another break after 246. Unfortunately, and not surprisingly given my tenuous reasoning, I was wrong.
I also tried treating them as octal numbers, but to no avail.
Any other hints? |
Not sure about the break in the pattern, as only the last 5 bits are rotated. Otherwise you had it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jack_Ian
Big Endian
|
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 10:38 pm Post subject: 12 |
|
|
| Icarus wrote: |
| Not sure about the break in the pattern, as only the last 5 bits are rotated. Otherwise you had it. |
Seems so obvious now.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Tired of his old title
|
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2011 10:58 pm Post subject: 13 |
|
|
| Wow. Nothing like what I was looking at. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antrax
ESL Student
|
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 4:38 am Post subject: 14 |
|
|
117-122 over and over again? If I'm right, then this is one I wouldn't have got had I not seen the first one  _________________ After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Tired of his old title
|
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 3:38 pm Post subject: 15 |
|
|
| Zag wrote: |
What's next?
53, 303, 103, 75, 119, 192, ...
|
Hint: It's related to this sequence, which might be easier
(6, 10), (4, 5), (6, 9), (5, 7), (5, 6), (4, 6, 5) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Icarus
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 3:42 pm Post subject: 16 |
|
|
| Antrax wrote: |
117-122 over and over again? If I'm right, then this is one I wouldn't have got had I not seen the first one  |
It would be 117, 122, 109, 118, 107 and then back to the original 117 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Icarus
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 3:43 pm Post subject: 17 |
|
|
| Zag wrote: |
| Zag wrote: |
What's next?
53, 303, 103, 75, 119, 192, ...
|
Hint: It's related to this sequence, which might be easier
(6, 10), (4, 5), (6, 9), (5, 7), (5, 6), (4, 6, 5) |
I'm not ignoring yours, I just am not familiar enough with how to solve this type of puzzle  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Tired of his old title
|
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2011 4:42 pm Post subject: 18 |
|
|
S'ok. I didn't really expect anyone to get it without more hints.
The relationship is not arithmetic. It would help more to consult a history book than a math book. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Tired of his old title
|
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2011 5:52 pm Post subject: 19 |
|
|
Another hint: Both of the above are related to this sequence:
W, A, J, M, M, A, ...
Last hint, which is something of a giveaway: There are currently 44 entries in each list. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
3iff
very unbifflike
|
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 7:43 am Post subject: 20 |
|
|
| Just a guess Presidents? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Tired of his old title
|
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 1:23 pm Post subject: 21 |
|
|
| Yep. So now the second sequence should be easy, and then it's just a short hop to the first one. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
3iff
very unbifflike
|
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 1:29 pm Post subject: 22 |
|
|
Ok, after staring at it for a while, sequence 2 is number of letters in the names of the US presidents
Now need to work out the first sequence...which appears meaningless. I can't link it to sequence 2...possibly being a Brit doesn't help.
Got it...Day of birthday, 53 = Feb 22nd for Washington...and so on. which makes the next number 74...I hope.
Hooray. I actually solved a puzzle (subject to confirmation). I'm not normally very good at these. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Tired of his old title
|
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 1:50 pm Post subject: 23 |
|
|
| That's it! Congrats! I had thought I might still have to give the clue that the highest value in the sequence is 364 (Andrew Johnson). What's crazy is that this was one of the ideas I had in looking at Icarus' sequence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
3iff
very unbifflike
|
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 2:10 pm Post subject: 24 |
|
|
I was looking at when they were in office. I needed to do a sidestep.
I have a puzzle like this...I bet I've lost the data. I'll have a look. Found it.
It's a bit messy in text but here goes.
| Code: |
1 1 1 1 1 3 1 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 6 6 6 6 7 7 (7)
| | |
2 1 |
|---------------------------------|
|
The 5th 1 is linked to the 2 and that (the 2) is linked to the first 7
The central 1 below the main line is not linked to anything.
Imagine the 2 and 1 are in a different colour (to distinguish them from the main line).
Explain the sequence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
3iff
very unbifflike
|
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2011 3:37 pm Post subject: 25 |
|
|
As I'm not back for a few days, a couple of hints may be necessary
Hint 1: It's a person
Hint 2: It's a fictional person |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
3iff
very unbifflike
|
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2011 7:08 am Post subject: 26 |
|
|
Seems to have been a quiet weekend all over this forum.
Hint 3: It's a fictional character in books, but MAINLY films, starting from the early '60s |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Scurra
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2011 9:43 am Post subject: 27 |
|
|
I missed this one (was doing the MS puzzle) but I liked the idea of this one, which was very amusing. (Although I do think that the 2 should have been more like 234 - then again, I like that one which is more than a lot of people do.) _________________
still Quiz Olympiad champion. Must get a life.
New definitions: COFFEE - someone who is coughed upon
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jack_Ian
Big Endian
|
Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 11:05 pm Post subject: 28 |
|
|
| I'm lost with this one. I started looking at fictional characters and actors who played them, but got nowhere. Am I barking up the wrong tree? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Scurra
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sun Nov 06, 2011 11:45 pm Post subject: 29 |
|
|
No, not completely. Here's a massive hint: It's the same fictional character... _________________
still Quiz Olympiad champion. Must get a life.
New definitions: COFFEE - someone who is coughed upon
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
3iff
very unbifflike
|
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 9:54 am Post subject: 30 |
|
|
Another hint.
He's English...and you have heard of him |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Suspence
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 2:43 pm Post subject: 31 |
|
|
Seems like we're looking for James Bond and the chronological order of the actors.
1 = Sean Connery
2 = David Niven
3 = George Lazenby
4 = Roger Moore
5 = Timothy Dalton
6 = Pierce Brosnan
7 = Daniel Craig
The second line contains the 2 non-Eon films.
The "2" on the second line is linked to the "7" since both are versions of "Casino Royale"
The "1" on the second line represents "Never Say Never Again". While it's not linked to anything, it possibly could be since it was a non-Eon remake of "Thunderball". _________________ I hate people who try to write interesting things in their signature. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Scurra
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 3:26 pm Post subject: 32 |
|
|
No, no, it's perfectly clear that it's not a remake of Thunderball; it just happens to have lots of elements in common. Unless you want to get sued.
(btw, that's why I said that the first Casino Royale should really have been numbered 234 because there are at least three characters who are called James Bond at some point in the film.) _________________
still Quiz Olympiad champion. Must get a life.
New definitions: COFFEE - someone who is coughed upon
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
3iff
very unbifflike
|
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 3:42 pm Post subject: 33 |
|
|
That's pretty much it. I don't recall seeing the first Casono Royale (but if I did it was a long time ago). It might be better to number them 2a/2b/2c
Actually, according to IMDB, there were a host of Bonds. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Scurra
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 4:47 pm Post subject: 34 |
|
|
True. I forgot that there is a bit where pretty much everyone is called James Bond... (Niven, Sellars and (arguably) Allen are the only ones who are called it for any sustained period of time though, iirc.) _________________
still Quiz Olympiad champion. Must get a life.
New definitions: COFFEE - someone who is coughed upon
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jack_Ian
Big Endian
|
Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2011 5:50 pm Post subject: 35 |
|
|
Ahh! Never thought of him. I'd forgotten he stretched back to the sixties.
I was looking at characters like Flash Gordan and Tarzan.
Tarzan makes for an interesting sequence, especially if you take voice actors into account. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
3iff
very unbifflike
|
Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2011 9:55 am Post subject: 36 |
|
|
| Jack_Ian wrote: |
Ahh! Never thought of him. I'd forgotten he stretched back to the sixties.
I was looking at characters like Flash Gordan and Tarzan.
Tarzan makes for an interesting sequence, especially if you take voice actors into account. |
You should have made a puzzle then instead of giving away the idea. I wonder if I can make up another puzzle like this? I'll give it some thought. Don't expect an immediate response though... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jack_Ian
Big Endian
|
Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2011 11:35 am Post subject: 37 |
|
|
I'll spring it on you when you least expect it.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
3iff
very unbifflike
|
Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2011 11:48 am Post subject: 38 |
|
|
| I've got something lined up...and I've got a colleague to try it out first. Just waiting for him to look at it and throw it back in disgust because he can't solve it... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ralphmerridew
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2011 1:41 pm Post subject: 39 |
|
|
| The Bond books first appeared in the fifties. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|