|
|
|
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Sentran
Ray of Sucking Funshine
|
Posted: Mon Mar 26, 2012 11:11 pm Post subject: 1281 |
|
|
Day 4, 13 alive, 7 to lynch
Deadline: Monday, 9 April
Official Vote Count
| Code: |
-------------------------
Not voting (13): 3iff, Captin Aniima, cloudRunner, Durryn, Garou_Kinfolk, itisally, Jedo the Jedi, MNOWAX, ohcapt13, Silverfire, spyrl, Undercover Monk, Zag |
_________________ Sentran
"Speaking of double negatives, I haven't read greylab yet today." - Lifeinmomland |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Garou_Kinfolk
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 12:50 am Post subject: 1282 |
|
|
First thing. (Been wanting to do this since day 2)
www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7L2PVdrb_8
Yay town for not dying!
And finally, I have a new message from little birds. It says a little bird informs me that one of Chataya’s working girls was severely beaten by a patron. Again, no idea what it means. _________________ Most posts made from my phone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
itisally
Master of Disguise
|
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 1:25 am Post subject: 1283 |
|
|
I have a couple of things that I have been working on over night. I will post the easy one first. There has been a lot of talk about who is hiding in the shadows and lurking in corners so here is a list of people in order of post counts for day 3
| Code: |
0 Silverfire
3 Captin Aniima
3 ohcapt13
5 spyrl
6 3iff
7 MNOWAX
8 Durryn
11 Garou_Kinfolk
12 Jedo the Jedi
13 Zag
14 cloudRunner
15 itisally
17 Undercover Monk
|
I realize that it is out of context, and there are ways that a crafty mafia member can find ways to raise the count without much content. I will also note that neither of the people I have an eye on are in the top half of this list.
I have another information rather than annalysis post I hope to get to tonight.
In regards to Garou Kinfolk- I think it is interesting tht the little birds message came to you again. I wonder if they are trying to take advantage of the Mason voting block or if it is linked to your character.
It maybe a hint as to who was attacked last night and lived. _________________ I could agree with you, but then we would both be wrong. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Tired of his old title
|
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 2:23 am Post subject: 1284 |
|
|
What a relief! I was really worried that we'd lose two more, and we could have found ourselves approaching lynch or lose. Nice job! to whoever prevented the kill (kills?) last night!
I really not that wild about going after lurkers. I don't usually find it to be that much of a scum tell, honestly. After all, there's one of our best-confirmed townie in the queen lurker position. We are past time for policy lynches and we really have to find a scum.
I only wish I had something useful to suggest. I can hardly blame people for the Amb lynch, since I was front and center on it. Of course there are scum on that bandwagon, but I no longer feel that I have the least bit of clue. I'm just hoping that someone learned something of value last night, but I'm still not sure if it is time to out yourself to share it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Garou_Kinfolk
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 2:55 am Post subject: 1285 |
|
|
| Quote: |
In regards to Garou Kinfolk- I think it is interesting tht the little birds message came to you again. I wonder if they are trying to take advantage of the Mason voting block or if it is linked to your character.
It maybe a hint as to who was attacked last night and lived. |
My thought to the "little birds" and why I keep getting them is simply that I come forward and post what I had received. They might not be able to see what information the "birds" get. Of course the whole little birds thing could just be misinformation.
I don't believe it's related to my character in any way. My character is basically a hand maiden for the Starks. If there is some part that's liked to my character, I have no knowledge of it. _________________ Most posts made from my phone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
itisally
Master of Disguise
|
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 3:44 am Post subject: 1286 |
|
|
I agree that I am not sure where to go from here. I thought I would take a look at who was on the Lynches. I think I mentioned before how much I like charts. I underlined the dead and bolded known scum.
Day 1: jadesmar (11): Deception, Undercover Monk, Zag, Elethiomel, novice, Fritzler, Lucresia, itisally, MNOWAX, jadesmar, Jedo the Jedi
Day 2: Deception (7): Amb, ohcapt13, MNOWAX, cloudRunner, 3iff, Silverfire
Day 3: Amb (8): itisally, Zag, MNOWAX, spyrl, ohcapt13, cloudRunner, 3iff, Undercover Monk
Person on all three: MNOWAX
People on two: Undercover Monk, Zag, itisally, cloudRunner, 3iff, ohcapt13, Jedo the Jedi
People(alive) on one: Silverfire
So I was thinking, what does this really tell me? I would assume that Scum would not be so blatant as to be on all three townie lynches so I feel even better about my town read on MNOWAX. Day one we are all guessing except the mafia and it takes a lot to lynch so there are likely to be a couple hiding there, but for days 2 and 3 I would think that they would avoid being on both. So, 3iff, Ohcapt, and cloudRunner look a little more town like. It isn’t much because I am pretty confident that Zag is town. I know that I am town. That leaves me looking more closely at Undercover Monk and Jedo today.
I also noticed that cloudRunner keeps coming coming up in people’s votes but hasn’t really had any direct pressure so I might go looking there.
Anyone have some more information regarding these three guys? _________________ I could agree with you, but then we would both be wrong. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos
|
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 1:09 pm Post subject: 1287 |
|
|
well balls. I was hoping for at least 1 death so we have another confirmed townie =(. The only scum we have hit was done by a third party so this town has yet to do anything useful. And the annoying part for me is its not from lack of trying. for a 20 player game lurking hasnt been a huge issue we have a few but most of the remaining players are at least checking in. Dont forget we may need to kill one of our masons if we get deeper into the game. If silver is kept alive just cause we know hes town but he isnt voting LoL gets pushed up one cycle.
For instance say Zag and itsally are scum and its down to them silver, garou, and me. town still has a voting majority but since silver isnt posting they would have effectively won the game at 5. Its also very possible ther are 3 scum left plus a serial killer. so we have a lot to do.
Thats my initial raection to the news of the day. Im not commenting on the little birds because like I said before I have not read any of the books. _________________ The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Tired of his old title
|
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:40 pm Post subject: 1288 |
|
|
You think that there are only 3 scum left? I can't believe that Sentran built a game with 21 people but only 4 scum. I've been assuming that there are at least 4 left, possibly even 5 (and an SK). That's why I was so worried about waking up and finding two more dead townies this morning.
In any case, your logic is so flawed as to be suspicious. It's true that an inactive townie is no help once we reach lynch or lose, but having one remaining is still better than having a scum remaining. We have no chance of lynching a scum if we focus on the inactive known townies.
If you're trying to say that Silver shouldn't be as cleared as she is, then I'd agree that is a conversation worth having (though I doubt very much you'd convince me). But if you're saying that you believe her to be town but want a policy lynch anyway, then you might as well admit that we've otherwise run out of targets for you and your scum buddies to go after. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Durryn
Doghouse Dweller
|
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 5:59 pm Post subject: 1289 |
|
|
Vote: Cloudrunner
See yesterday for my explanation.
Dang... I am sooooo tired of trying to read these guys and gals. We have to protect the town and I have been thinking a mass claim at this point wouldn't be such a bad idea.
What does everyone else think? Are we allowed to do that? _________________ If there's anything around here more important than my ego, I want it caught and shot now! - Zaphod Beeblebrox |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos
|
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 7:02 pm Post subject: 1290 |
|
|
really Zag you think there are possibly 5 scum left and a sk. that would be a total of 6 mafia, a sk and a vig. 8 killing roles more than 1/3 of the roles I doubt that. if there are 5 left we are screwed anyway. so when should we kill silver. unless you dont want us to take out the inactives cause its helping you win scum.
anyway silver can wait for the moment:
I was inspired by Zag to do a little hypothetical thinking about the Amb bandwagon. Lets look at all the votes and why they may be town or scum.
Town reasons to vote Amb:
Itsally: Amb seems to know more than letting on.
Zag: Amb was lying he needed to be pressured.
MNO: Amb's ability may be the SK????
spyrl: Agrees with reasoning
UM: Can get behind an amb lynch (later made the argument amb gave us the most info.)
Garou: Lynch all Liars and gut instinct
Ohcapt: Amb is at the top of his scum meter
cloudrunner: Ambs rolename could not be in the game.
3iff: agrees with cloudrunner
Ok now lets assume each voter is scum why did they put their vote on Amb????
Itisally: being the first voter gives ally some credit. However Amb was a pretty good choice to start a bandwagon on and ally seems to fade into the background once the bandwagon gets rolling. also re-read jedo's post 1156 on itisally and he does raise several good points IGMEOY
Zag: Kinda led the charge on Amb. first as a liar and then at least lending credence to cloudrunners theory on Ambs claim. not much time passed between you initial vote and confirm vote (less than 24 hours and a very short post by amb). pretty simple bandwagon leading going on here if you are scum.
MNO: Just being MNO. he makes a great scum because he is impossible to read.
Spyrl/UM/Garou/Ohcap/3iff: Blatant bandwagonning votes on these 5. while mine had a higher purpose thats what it was. 3iffs came after the theory put forth by cloud so I give him a semi pass there. The most damning IMHO is spyrl and ohcap whenever lurkers bandwagon its always suspicious and ohcap is new enough to make it an obvious new scum tell. Garou gets a pass cause he is as close to a 100% confirmed town as you get in mafia.
Cloudrunner gets a seperate entry cause his was more than just bandwagonning. It was a new piece of evidence and what appeared to be if not strong at least very logical. However if he knows the books this is a very easy scum move. why bother planting evidence against amb when he can just say look at the flavor text. Ambs role can not possibly exist. Also if you look at how he reacts to the ambwagon its very flip-floppy. In post 1144 he meta-games about the E and novice kills (meta-gaming on kills always raises red flags to me) he finishes that post with a case against durryn. In his next significant post (1212) he defends amb saying that he doesnt see a scum being so flippatnt with their double votes if they would get locked in. in his next series of posts he continues to defend amb. then amb claims and all the arguments he wasmaking mean nothing. Im not condemning him but it does give the vibe he was just waiting for an opening.
all that being said this is my list of people we should focus on first
scummy
Ohcapt: bandwagoner and lurker (its a 2 for 1 special)
Spyrl: same as above
Itisally: You dont like the spotlight being on you do you
Cloudrunner: dangerous player. If hes town he has made very good if incorrect points but if hes scum he is deadly good at what hes doing
Zag: semi confirmed but I have a sneaky suspicion that MNO and Zag are trying to pull off the greatest mafia gambit ever
MNOWAX: just being MNOWAX
3iff: no read and not as lurkish as others.
Not so Scummy
Innocent-ish: Garou
a note on myself: since Ive added myself in this I will give my opinion. though you have no reason to trust me anyway If I were an outsider I would probably put my name right around the cloudrunner level. If Im scum Im rocking this game if Im not then Ive made a decent contribution but gotten no where so far. I was right about deception though.
what do you think should we pressure ohcapt or does anyone agree with the scum reads n the active town members. _________________ The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Captin Aniima
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 7:11 pm Post subject: 1291 |
|
|
I’ve been thinking that Zag and MNO are really really dumb town or really really good mafia. Personally I’m leaning toward dumb town but I want some feedback.
Mostly I have been thinking of ways to say stuff to help without seeming like I’m scum but by now I figure if I breathe then I’m still gonna get a scum tell.
Fos: cloudRunner. You are getting on everyones heels about being helpful to town, like Deception, and yet you aren’t being very helpful yourself.
I have at least put forward some thoughts that are helpful to the town and whether or not you are listening to me is up to you. now I’m not going to repeat any of my thought because that is a waste of my time if you want to find theses go ahead and ISO me.
 _________________ Just sayin... The sky is blue. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
itisally
Master of Disguise
|
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 7:47 pm Post subject: 1292 |
|
|
@ Amiina - The problem is that I know from experience that Zag is not a dumb townie, he is a force to be reckoned and often sees patterns in the fog that I miss. The problem with that is it lends credence to the other option. As UM said it would be quite a ploy. I would think that someone with an investigative role may have gathered more info about them by now, but everyone seems to be playing their cards pretty close to their chests.
@ UM- You are right I don't like being in the spot light it is bad for my health as town or scum. My goal is to present my views on things and then see how others react. Go a head and keep an eye on me, I have nothing to hide.
I am torn about the silver thing. I see how leaving her until a LoL is bad, however I agree with Zag that it is a waste of a lynch that could be used to catch scum. Mostly I think it is to early in the day to resort to that. and find it slightly scummy that it would be your first suggestion of the day.
I did drop off yesterday(last week). School was canceled for snow so I didn't have as much uninterrupted computer time. I hope I can make up for it with some good input today. Some comments I would have liked to make: After further investigation, My character had headed to King's landing. (Yeah for "Find" on the Kindle). But when I read the setting from Sentran it reads to me like any one still in Westros is fair game. (not North of the wall and not over seas). With that, even those in Winterfell (the Stark boys) could be in the game. _________________ I could agree with you, but then we would both be wrong. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Garou_Kinfolk
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 7:57 pm Post subject: 1293 |
|
|
I've been thinking. 3iffs vote came less then 12 hours after my unvote. That may be just when he was able to vote earliest, but then again it might be sum avoiding a hammer vote. Its hard to say.
At the beginning of the game a mass claim would have been good, but now they've had time to find safe claims.
Silver is lurking, but she posted in the mason forum last night. She said cloudrunner was being very aggressive to get Amb lynched. I agree with her.
Monk still wanting to lynch a confirmed town mason seems like a waste of town time and a lynch.
I'll see if I can post more later. _________________ Most posts made from my phone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cloudRunner
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 8:26 pm Post subject: 1294 |
|
|
I will make a full post later, but I just wanted to say one quick thing.
The reason why I was all but convinced regarding the mod's wording was because I had PM'd him at the beginning of the game to clarify the game's setting and the response he gave me I misunderstood as a soft confirmation that my assumption (only King's Landing characters) was correct. I don't want to talk about this any further as this is outside-the-game and unverifiable at this point but keep that in mind when you try to judge me as "acting too aggressively towards Amb". I will post more when I get a chance to sit down tonight. _________________ Forever is such an unpleasant word |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Garou_Kinfolk
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Mar 27, 2012 9:38 pm Post subject: 1295 |
|
|
Sorry Cloudrunner. I had misquoted Silver. Her words were "overly eager" not aggressive, though the two can seem similar, which is where I made the mistake. _________________ Most posts made from my phone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos
|
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 12:37 am Post subject: 1296 |
|
|
ok thats makes me very suspicious of silver its one thing if she is not able to keep up the game its another if she is purposely lurking. can you ask her to please participate or request to be replced. _________________ The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 2:53 am Post subject: 1297 |
|
|
Checking in. Good news about the night's events. I will comment tomorrow on the things put out there, along with the direction I want to head. _________________ Paragon Tally: 18 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sentran
Ray of Sucking Funshine
|
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 3:38 am Post subject: 1298 |
|
|
Prodding Silverfire now. _________________ Sentran
"Speaking of double negatives, I haven't read greylab yet today." - Lifeinmomland |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
3iff
very unbifflike
|
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 9:18 am Post subject: 1299 |
|
|
| Garou wrote: |
| I've been thinking. 3iffs vote came less then 12 hours after my unvote. That may be just when he was able to vote earliest, but then again it might be sum avoiding a hammer vote. Its hard to say. |
Garou, you unvoted at 12.12am my local time on Thu. I started work at 8.30 on Thursday, read the latest posts, did some work, thought about what to say and posted at 11.27am Thursday morning local time (I'm in the UK so out of sync with most other players). Check my ISO to see my usual posting times...I don't see my post/vote as anything other than within normal times.
My long weekends are now over and I'll have 5 days a week to post from now on, excepting Easter (a 5 day break) which is imminent...
It's a relief that we had no nightkills but I wonder why? Roleblockers? Is it too far fetched to think that Amb was also an SK? I suppose his role card would have outed him as an SK.
| UM wrote: |
| Cloudrunner gets a seperate entry cause his was more than just bandwagonning. It was a new piece of evidence and what appeared to be if not strong at least very logical. |
So are you suggesting cloudRunner was trying to frame Amb? If so, then I appear to have fallen for it, however I think I was probably swayed too by the attitude from Amb. cloudRunner's idea seemed plausible and fitted with Amb's reluctance to be upfront about what he knew. I still think he knew all about his locked vote situation.
| spyrl wrote: |
| And for the record I am town and I am someone the town does not want to loose. |
Did you mean lose? (sorry, it's just one of the things that annoys me ). Though isn't announcing something like that going to be attracting unwanted attention? I wonder if you were responsible for preventing a nightkill last night, if so then great (but I don't expect you to tell us). If you are that valuable though, what benefits have we gained? Deception made a similar claim and yet didn't (to my knowledge) produce any solid evidence.
Garou: Thanks for the new little birds message...perhaps it's a ploy by the sender to distract us while we try to fathom out some meaning. Do any of the GoT experts have any insights to any of the messages? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
itisally
Master of Disguise
|
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 2:52 pm Post subject: 1300 |
|
|
I looked into who may have been at the brothel, but didn't come up with anything that I thought would help in game. Some character names, but it would not be limited to those. Without knowing who was attacked or how to link the information to what is going on in the game I fear it is useless.
Alayaya- Chataya's daughter
Chataya- Brothel owner
Mhaegen- Barra's Mother
Barra- Robert's bastard (baby)
Tyrion- Frequents Brothels _________________ I could agree with you, but then we would both be wrong. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 10:00 pm Post subject: 1301 |
|
|
itisally, I am only on one of those lynches, so I'll thank you to remember that before you start painting me because of VCA. (If it's for something else, fine, but let's have correct facts.)
Monk, I see and understand your reasoning about Silver, but I really don't agree. Since she is now confirmed town, if we ever get to such a situation, she can surely be reached to come and throw down a vote or be replaced for just such a purpose. No need to be doing something like that. Regarding your following post, I can also see pressuring ohcapt, but what else scummy has he really done? Maybe if there is an argument he hasn't been around enough to get a solid read, but I still think there are people who actually seem scummy who would be better targets.
I really don't like spyrl's post(s) at the end of yesterday. Maybe she was trying to draw a kill, or maybe she was trying to make herself seem invaluable. It feels pretty shady either way.
I see fit to return to my vote: Durryn. I think it was a good point that cloudrunner initially made: it seems like Durryn wanted off the main lynch to avoid suspicion, but he botched it by putting the diversionary vote on a cleared person. The town was distracted by Amb yesterday, but I think this warrants due consideration today. _________________ Paragon Tally: 18 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
itisally
Master of Disguise
|
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 1:22 am Post subject: 1302 |
|
|
Sorry about that Jedo, It was an honest mistake. _________________ I could agree with you, but then we would both be wrong. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 3:17 am Post subject: 1303 |
|
|
I'm sure it was. I've made a few myself (like the one spyrl mentioned earlier). I just like to talk tough. _________________ Paragon Tally: 18 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
itisally
Master of Disguise
|
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 3:34 am Post subject: 1304 |
|
|
Jedo, I was wondering what your feelings on CloudRunner are. _________________ I could agree with you, but then we would both be wrong. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cloudRunner
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 5:20 am Post subject: 1305 |
|
|
So to start off, I'm sorry I led the town on a bad lynch against Amb. I came to realize after the lynch votes were met that I was going to be wrong when Amb didn’t make a “bah” post and as you can see I let out my frustration on the mod. I did PM an apology to him and let out some more frustration regarding his wording in that post but I am over that now. I’m not going to just sit back and let you guys lynch me out of retaliation, though. I know the scum would love to push for a lynch on me now since I’m such an easy target for a retaliation-lynch.
| itisally wrote: |
| I would assume that Scum would not be so blatant as to be on all three townie lynches so I feel even better about my town read on MNOWAX. Day one we are all guessing except the mafia and it takes a lot to lynch so there are likely to be a couple hiding there, but for days 2 and 3 I would think that they would avoid being on both. So, 3iff, Ohcapt, and cloudRunner look a little more town like. It isn’t much because I am pretty confident that Zag is town |
This is a bad assumption to make. Not saying that you should think I'm scum, but you just can't assume anyone is not scum just by analyzing their vote behavior. Scum may try to make logical arguments and vote against their own scum buddies if in their eyes it'll help them earn points with the town.
| Undercover Monk wrote: |
| Dont forget we may need to kill one of our masons if we get deeper into the game. If silver is kept alive just cause we know hes town but he isnt voting LoL gets pushed up one cycle. |
We can't afford to lynch claimed townies at this point. Let the Mod just modkill them. I am not ready to believe that ALL masons are vanilla townies. There has to be some reason why Garou is getting these communications. I think we should assume that a few masons have additional abilities (unless Garou wants to reveal that for us).
| Captin Aniima wrote: |
Fos: cloudRunner. You are getting on everyones heels about being helpful to town, like Deception, and yet you aren’t being very helpful yourself.
I have at least put forward some thoughts that are helpful to the town and whether or not you are listening to me is up to you. now I’m not going to repeat any of my thought because that is a waste of my time if you want to find theses go ahead and ISO me. |
Excuse me? Even though I was wrong, I presented a valid argument and defended it with evidence based on information that was available to the town. I also made a case and raised suspicion on Durryn which garnered support from the town. I have posted tons more content than you have (which in turn helps the town by giving everyone more content to judge me with) whereas you’ve posted “thoughts” that are merely rehashes of what everyone else has said. Clarify how I haven't been very helpful, because that sounds like you're attempting an accusation just for the sake of pointing a finger at me.
------
Bringing back up my case against Durryn.
-Going back to his post 1229, after I first introduced my case on Amb:
| Quote: |
Ally said her character wasn't in Kings Landing at the time either...... Don't you suppose it's possible Amb is clean?
Did we ever clear you CloudRunner? |
My problems with this post:
1) He's taking Ally's word as gospel without question. Doesn't pause to think that Amb and itisally could be in league with each other (this would have been a plausible reservation to have at the time).
2) Asks if the Town had cleared me when he himself wasn't even cleared. Kinda hypocritical using this in his reasoning to vote for me, unless of course, he's just trying to find an easy way to form an "I told you so!" lynch in the event I was wrong.
Later on he completely ignored the evidence supporting my argument (my numerous quotes of Sentran's post), see this exchange we had in posts 1255 & 1256. After I repeated my evidence for Durryn, he does not acknowledge it at all.
If Durryn were scum, he'd know my case on Amb would come up wrong. So he could make posts that would appear as if he genuinely believed Amb's claim so that he could point back later with an "I told you so" post (which he did in 1289). He has proven this to me in my mind by the fact that he showed no signs of contemplating my case and blatantly disregarded all of my supporting argument.
Also, let me repost my start-of-Day 3 argument against Durryn's end-of-Day2 play, to which he NEVER responded.
| me wrote: |
| oh and then there’s Durryn, who switched his vote to Lucresia at the very last minute, because for some reason joining a dying wagon on an inactive mason was better than MNO/Deception. This to me looks like a blatant act to shield himself from potentially getting flak from being on a bad lynchwagon the next day. |
Vote: Durryn _________________ Forever is such an unpleasant word |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Durryn
Doghouse Dweller
|
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 6:12 am Post subject: 1306 |
|
|
Cloudrunner, I have answered your question and if you don't like my answer, tough.
LYNCH ALL LIARS:
| Durryn wrote: |
| We HAVE to get votes on someone that will give us information and wont hurt the town. One way would be to lynch Lucresia and that would verify our Mason are true. Very good info in my book. I can't in good conscience vote for MNO or Deception any more, even if Deception is the scummiest townie in this game. |
and
| Durryn wrote: |
| vote: Lucresia She is a lurker lynch and will prove Garou and Silver are telling the truth. minimal damage to the town and maximum information. |
and finally
| Durryn wrote: |
| Not sure what you mean, Jedo. My vote change was fairly straight forward. Sentran said that so long as there was good conversation, he would extend the deadline. I was hoping the deadline would be pushed out and we would be able to make a better wagon. |
So while the last one was not directed at cloudRunner, did answer the question.
Help us hunt scum and get off my back. I hate quoting myself. _________________ If there's anything around here more important than my ego, I want it caught and shot now! - Zaphod Beeblebrox |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cloudRunner
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 6:39 am Post subject: 1307 |
|
|
Again, let me spell it out for you. I want YOUR response to MY accusation of trying to shield yourself from getting flak for being on a bad lynchwagon. Even your behavior with the Amb wagon seems to fall in line with this - distancing from lynching someone who, if ended up flipping town, wouldn't get you on someone's scumdar.
| Quote: |
| Help us hunt scum and get off my back |
That's precisely what I'm doing. We're not going to magically pull scum names out of the rabbit hat. _________________ Forever is such an unpleasant word |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Durryn
Doghouse Dweller
|
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 6:52 am Post subject: 1308 |
|
|
Go away cloudRunner, you're pissing me off. _________________ If there's anything around here more important than my ego, I want it caught and shot now! - Zaphod Beeblebrox |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
cloudRunner
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 7:14 am Post subject: 1309 |
|
|
That'll happen when you vote for someone with some actual reasoning. I don't see how you can say that I'm not scum hunting. All you gave in defense of Amb was 1255, which I shot down in the following post. Just because I got Amb wrong doesn't mean I'm intentionally trying to kill off townies. Unlike you, who wanted to lynch Lucresia to see if the mason claim is legit.
So keep ignoring my questions. Getting "pissed off" at a random person on the internet is a cool story, bro. _________________ Forever is such an unpleasant word |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 12:14 pm Post subject: 1310 |
|
|
| itisally wrote: |
| Jedo, I was wondering what your feelings on CloudRunner are. |
His biggest town point to me is dropping his Durryn wagon to pursue Amb with such fervor. He didn't need to do that (if he was scum, he might have done better just to stay off). I just don't envision scum throwing themselves to the fore like that.
Durryn, I countered that last quote already. While you did give answers, they were all countered or were unsatisfactory. That's why we kept asking for a response. Also, as cloud said, this is scumhunting; we're just hunting you. _________________ Paragon Tally: 18 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos
|
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 2:38 pm Post subject: 1311 |
|
|
| Jedo the Jedi wrote: |
Regarding your following post, I can also see pressuring ohcapt, but what else scummy has he really done? Maybe if there is an argument he hasn't been around enough to get a solid read, but I still think there are people who actually seem scummy who would be better targets.
|
Wow this post screams scum. You say what else scummy has ohcapt done then say say that we should lynch someone (not ohcapt) who actually seems scummy. do you see the contradiction.
In fact the whole point is that the only thing that ohcapt did all game was bandwagon a townie. He gives no reason for doing this other than than saying he was at the top of his scum meter. I get away with blatant bandwagoning cause I have at several times in this game voiced opinions contray to the majority. what has ohcapt done but followed the crowd.
Ive had a gut feeling about you (Jedo) for quite some time in this game and you have miracuously avoided pressure all game partly because you left. Which initself is a metagaming reason to suspect you. Sentran has already killed off 2 townies and yet your role gets replaced not once but twice. Almost as if its an important role like say mafia or SK.
Of course now I have a pretty surefire way of testiong my theory. Vote;Ohcapt13 If Im wrong about you two we only lose a townie who is about as much help as silverfire. If Im right Im fairly certain we have caught two scum one being a very crafty jedo. _________________ The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sentran
Ray of Sucking Funshine
|
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 3:38 pm Post subject: 1312 |
|
|
| Undercover Monk wrote: |
| Sentran has already killed off 2 townies and yet your role gets replaced not once but twice. Almost as if its an important role like say mafia or SK. |
I would like to say that I have done my best to replace anyone who requested a replacement. The two who were removed from the game had nothing to do with their role, and everything to do with their level of activity. They had gone silent for 3 weeks, and had not picked up their prods. I would much prefer to replace even an inactive player, if I had anyone with which to replace them. _________________ Sentran
"Speaking of double negatives, I haven't read greylab yet today." - Lifeinmomland |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos
|
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 6:32 pm Post subject: 1313 |
|
|
I think you took my post the wrong way I was in no means blaming you for the replacements. But just pointing out that you had replaced jedos role twice while while others simply were modkilled like I said its metagaming.
For example Jedo leaves you replace with quail who also leaves because their role is critical to the balance of the game you do not wish to modkill that role so you ask if jedo would take over since quail cant do it. Would you be that desperate to ask a player who already requested replacement back in the game if it were something like mason I doubt it.
Total metagaming and in no way does that constitute evidence against jedo. which is why Im voting OCap. Its just part of my overall theory. In fact sentran you have done very well considering all the inactivity you've had to deal with. _________________ The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Silverfire
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 8:53 pm Post subject: 1314 |
|
|
My lurking hasn't been intentional. I've been really busy, I regret taking this on and letting other players down, and I would ask to be replaced except I know there are no replacements left.
I have only weak suspicions, so I'm going to do a little analysis and see what comes up.
I don't know if this is going to be helpful to anyone, but I broke down the three final vote counts we've had so far. We've been voting for mostly townies, so the information might not be that helpful, but here it is. "Townie" is the number of times that person was voting for a townie in a final vote count, and "Living" is the number of times they voted for someone who is still living. No one voted for Fritzler, our only known scum, in a final vote count. The list of people who ever voted for Fritzler is Garou_Kinfolk, ohcapt13, Durryn, itisally.)
| Code: |
Townie Living
Zag 2
MNOWAX 3
Durryn 1 1
itisally 2
Jedo the Jedi 1 2
cloudRunner 3
spyrl 2
Silverfire 1
Garou_Kinfolk
3iff 3
Undercover Monk 2 1
Captin Aniima 1 2
ohcapt13 2
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Thu Mar 29, 2012 9:56 pm Post subject: 1315 |
|
|
| Undercover Monk wrote: |
| You say what else scummy has ohcapt done then say say that we should lynch someone (not ohcapt) who actually seems scummy. do you see the contradiction. |
No, I don't, and I'm not sure you read that correctly. I said, I don't think that in itself is a reason to lynch ohcapt, but if there was other evidence, I could be inclined to vote him. Then, because I didn't immediately see anything else to signal ohcapt is scum, I suggested another target (Durryn). Maybe you could explain the contradiction more clearly?
Also, this should clear up why my replacing situation was different. You must have missed it the first time.
| Jedo the Jedi wrote: |
| It is indeed a strange situation. I actually asked out because I was attempting to give up most internet activities during Lent, but only if Sentran could find me a replacement. Quail was apparently gracious, but it seems he had more pressing issues. I opted back in to save Sentran the trouble (I know how much of a pain it is looking for replacements). |
_________________ Paragon Tally: 18 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Tired of his old title
|
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 1:06 am Post subject: 1316 |
|
|
I've been reading over this interplay between UMonk and Jedo. Frankly, they both seem at least as suspicious as ohcapt. Does anyone else think that UMonk and Jedo are scum buddies, and their little disagreement over OhCapt is just acting?
Looking at both their records, I have to admit that Jedo stood firm in support of Amb, either having seen something that we didn't or possibly he had an actual ability involved. If he were scum, he took a big chance of derailing the bandwagon on a fairly powerful townie.
UMonk, on the other hand, put in the hammer. It was just a time-saver, because the result was foregone, anyway, but it hardly adds to his credibility. However, his constant calls for mod-kills and for killing known townies have gotten my suspicions up. If this were day 1 or 2, his actions would be strong enough for me to vote. But here we are, getting past the half-way point with very little to work with. So I'm just going to give a strong FOS UMonk, but I don't think it's enough to vote. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
itisally
Master of Disguise
|
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 2:03 am Post subject: 1317 |
|
|
I was eyeballing CloudRunner, but I think he has done a pretty good job for now.
I have been feeling sketchy about UM and Jedo. I do feel like it may be possible that they are trying to bus someone who isn't very active to build credibility with the town.
I don't think Durryn is scum because he disagreed with Cloudrunner's interpretation of the setting. Durryn didn't vote for Amb because he believed the claim and read, correctly, that Stannis could be in the game based on the setting. UM and CloudRunner keep dogging him about it. Right now I think that Um maybe trying to lynch the townie and/or buddy up with Cloudrunner.
Of course this assumes I believe Durryn, think CloudRunner is town and UM, Jedo & OhCapt are scum. I could be wrong. I have no solid evidence (hence no vote yet)
And just a note on my vote analysis: I didn't vote based on it because I understand the fundamental flaw in using that as a single piece of context. Both Jedo and Cloudrunner have used said that I shouldn't thin someone is (isn't) scum based on a vote analysis and all I can say to them is "Well duh!" But that doesn't mean that we shouldn't look at it. What are you afraid we will see? _________________ I could agree with you, but then we would both be wrong. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 2:34 am Post subject: 1318 |
|
|
For the record, cloudRunner and myself are hounding Durryn about voting a claimed mason (Lucresia) instead of MNO/Deception (or nobody at all, as would have been my preference). _________________ Paragon Tally: 18 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
3iff
very unbifflike
|
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 9:19 am Post subject: 1319 |
|
|
On hounding Durryn: I commented on this earlier after someone had raised the point. Switching away from MNO/Deception was 'fair enough'. Then immediately voting for Lucresia (after the mass of votes had already moved off her) seemed utterly pointless. Lucresia was never a lynch candidate at that point. Just unvoting would have been a less controversial ploy.
I'm still undecided whether this was stupid, clever or one of those indecisive moments. A quick skim of Durryn's ISO doesn't show anything helpful (other than a possible bussing of Fritzler on day 1...wow, that was a long time ago).
The UM/Jedo spat seems to have erupted from nowhere...odd and confusing. I can't work out if they are attacking Ohcapt13 or defending him, but they have managed to bring him back on the radar though. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos
|
Posted: Fri Mar 30, 2012 1:55 pm Post subject: 1320 |
|
|
interesting responses. I didnt know me and jedo were arguing. Im scumhunting he responded. Im not deception. speaking of which I love how Zag gives jedo a pass for his support of Amb but my firm support of deception means nothing.
anyway on to jedo's response:
I had a feeling you wouldnt get what I was trying to show you. I should have explained it better.
| Quote: |
| Regarding your following post, I can also see pressuring ohcapt, but what else scummy has he really done? . |
Here you say the word else. meaning you admit his bandwagon vote is scummy.
| Quote: |
| but I still think there are people who actually seem scummy who would be better targets. |
Here you say we should go after people who seem scummy (not ohcapt). But you just said admited in the previous line that Ohcapt was scummy. You used the word else in your post I realize that this could just be a problem with wording hence why I used the word contradiction as opposed to lie.
Also my case against you is about 80% gut feeling 20% circumstantial evidence. Which is why Im not voting for you Im voting for the legitamately scummy and lurker ohcapt.
Game theory discussion time:
To me playing a townie in mafia is all about hedging your bets. what lynch provides the highest reward with the lowest risk. Why is Lynch All Lurkers a good strategy regardless of what day it is? Because, No matter what the allignment you want everyone to be posting an equal amount. If Zag is posting a lot we want to keep him around ahead of ohcapt for 2 reasons if he is town he is constantly scumhunting and helping us. If he is scum he is constantly giving us posts with which to look back at and compare to see if he is lying scum. Jedo has already stated (and he may be the best analyzers of posts we have on the labyrinth) he cant get a read on ohcapt. Thats the beauty of lurking as scum after day 2 people start ignoring the lurkers and go after the heavy posters cause they are seen as controlling the game.
So...
do i find jedo suspicious yes a little. but he is too valuable an asset to lynch on a gut feeeling. (even though my gut has a reputation for being right) But Ohcapt brings nothing to the table. Lets at least pressure him/her ???? into giving an account of his actions.
Also thanks for chiming in silver just check in every once in awhile to cast a vote. make yourself an asset so the scum have no choice but to waste a nightkill on you if you at least are available to vote in LoL then we will have 2 people we know we can trust _________________ The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|