The Grey Labyrinth is a collection of puzzles, riddles, mind games, paradoxes and other intellectually challenging diversions. Related topics: puzzle games, logic puzzles, lateral thinking puzzles, philosophy, mind benders, brain teasers, word problems, conundrums, 3d puzzles, spatial reasoning, intelligence tests, mathematical diversions, paradoxes, physics problems, reasoning, math, science.

   
The Grey Labyrinth Forum Index
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups    RegisterRegister  
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

SURVIVOR MAFIA- TOWN WINS reunion show
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, ... 32, 33, 34  Next
 
Reply to topic    The Grey Labyrinth Forum Index -> Mafia Games
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Amb
Amb the Hitched.



PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 6:47 am    Post subject: 41 Reply with quote

I missed JTJ's vote. I guess you'd react just like that if you had 3.

In my experience the first person to be bandwagonned on day 1 is nearly never ever lynched. But if this is how you will react through the game, with extreme paranoia, and over reactions... then I'm not inclined to unvote.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address MSN Messenger
The Great Crep'er
2% Spambot



PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 8:43 am    Post subject: 42 Reply with quote

It's not 3, it's 5. MNOWAX, Zag, yourself, Jedo, and Deception. (not necessarily in that order). Please reread.

I guess a votecount is coming soon...
And I really don't understand how I'm being paranoid. Or even overreactive really. If you are referring to the long post I made about you and Deception, I guess it may be somewhat understandable...if you are biased against long posts. The way I see it, Deception built a case against me and you were okay with voting anyone off, hence the "as good as any". Two hard points to rebut as they came from very internalized places of your brains, where post like mine have minimal control or influence. So, naturally, I complained about your playstyle as I thought it was counterproductive and I got scumtells from Decep and wanted you to elaborate. (A natural reaction to a vote with virtually no reason) Any faults? Maybe a bit long. Maybe you can cite the text where you feel those signals because I don't have Amb's brain and therefore can't see eye to eye on your new concerns that maintain your vote.

You know what strikes me as paranoid? Seeing a light D1 post and saying "hey that looks like scum doing something" and framing it as if it was some massive scum tell. Yet you make no mention of that and it is supposedly a problem you have with me...strange... Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The Great Crep'er
2% Spambot



PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 9:01 am    Post subject: 43 Reply with quote

Amb wrote:
I missed JTJ's vote. I guess you'd react just like that if you had 3.

In my experience the first person to be bandwagonned on day 1 is nearly never ever lynched. But if this is how you will react through the game, with extreme paranoia, and over reactions... then I'm not inclined to unvote.


bolded is mine

a. Still no bearing on the result of this game (Heard of mafia blitz? And you yourself are giving them an opening with literally no strings attached)
b. Like I said to Jedo, still isn't the most effective way to go about business, BWing for the sake of BWing, especially when you have no rationale for a vote. I guess people get punished for asking "Why are you voting me?/Are you sure this is a good reason for voting me?" Bit unfair if you ask me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sentran
Ray of Sucking Funshine



PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 9:21 am    Post subject: 44 Reply with quote

I haven't even finished reading all of the posts thus far, since a few of them are larger than the average Day 1 posts. I just wanted to get in my Vote: Apple Sause for abandoning the GoT Mafia game without notice.
_________________
Sentran
"Speaking of double negatives, I haven't read greylab yet today." - Lifeinmomland
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Zag
Tired of his old title



PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 12:32 pm    Post subject: 45 Reply with quote

Amb wrote:
You have two votes...

What would you have done if you had 3?

This is so far wrong as to seem intentional. At the time you wrote that, he had 5 votes, where your vote was the 4th.

On the other hand, TGC, while I have used the dice to select a voting target in games, I'm pretty sure that I've only done so when I was mafia, for exactly the reasons that Deception pointed out -- mafia tend to be a lot more worried about offending people.

And finally, even though it was 5 votes, acquired fairly quickly, we are at 8 to lynch, so that was still too early to claim. It seems as if you're eager to get a claim out there, like maybe a scum with a safe claim would be. On the other hand, I doubt a scum would do that until after talking it over with his scum buddies, so I might just be making up reasons.

My bottom line is that this was too fast for a day 1 anything, and my vote was just a joke, so unvote TGC.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
Mackay
Saviour of Spiders



PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 1:35 pm    Post subject: 46 Reply with quote

The Great Creper Shocked

I just got home from work and am absolutely exhausted - so just a quick thought after a skim of the thread:

My main impression is that while I hate Rupert as a character, he's probably a "good guy" in this context. Not only that, but that is a HUGE name to be putting out there for someone who's lying, so I have to assume that either he isn't lying, or that Rupert Boneham was left out of the game by the mod to use as a safe claim - possible, but he's such a big character that I have my doubts. I feel like TGC's claim is probably pretty legit. (As I type this post, I'm convincing myself more and more.) I'm going to pretend that the whole "disproportionate response to a tiny slight" is him doing an excellent roleplay of his player character. Felicitous

Will post more in the morning, or maybe if I feel better later tonight and my eyes aren't glazing over while trying to read people's posts =)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training



PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 1:40 pm    Post subject: 47 Reply with quote

Wow. I know you have been away for a while, TGC, but we don't claim around here until at least L-2. I know you think this was all moving so quickly and you were about to be lynched, but you were still a significant number of votes away from being lynched. What surely was going to happen is others were going to come in on your behalf and say how ridiculously quick this was and vote somebody on your wagon, chalking it up to having a lame excuse for getting on the wagon. Then the tide would have turned, and you would have been fine. If not that, more would have piled on before a couple of people on the wagon bailed out because they didn't want to appear scummy if the lynch went through, and you wouldn't have died. *cough*ZAG*cough* Wink Regardless, you really would have been fine, and this whole process of vote switching would have given us some good interaction and talking points.

For the record, I'm not afraid of your claim. It's the reason I don't believe claims on Day 1: they are designed to scare the town into unvoting. If you had claimed "cop," people would be unvoting because they are afraid to lose such a powerful townie. Pfft. We'll survive. Just so you know. (Also, I note your disagreement with my play. It hasn't failed me yet.)

Zag, why not vote Amb for that post? You certainly threw out the suggestion of him being scummy without saying it. It's a pretty good scum tactic to put out suggestions for others to pick up on without doing it yourself. Votes are kind of more important on Day 1, and I'm pretty sure you know that. I guess this portion of post will suffice to log concretely this incident. I wouldn't want somebody to pass over it later. FOS: Zag
_________________
Paragon Tally: 18 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
Deception
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 2:38 pm    Post subject: 48 Reply with quote

The Great Crep'er wrote:

First, I feel like you should know a few things before you try to play detective here:
1. Dice tag voting, whether you do it or not, is a very common practice in the GL mafia games forum. Go spend a day or two (when you have the time, of course) researching past games and enjoying the rich, argumentative playstyle, from day one to the end of the game. A lot of games have started their day one with one or more dice-tag votes.

In the part I quoted, The Great Crep'er implies that I need to do reserach to find out that dice tag voting is common. Thus he knows or assumes that I don't know that it is common. Thus voting me because I supposedly know it is common is a contradiction. More likely he is scum who knows my innocence yet wants to attack me for some reason.

Also his claim is essentially "vote me and you could die". It's a great role to draw out PRs during the day, but it should also be ignored because it is perhaps fake.

Also Crep'er if you could be more succinct and not make massive wall posts, that's be super helpful. Revenge most foul!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos



PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 3:49 pm    Post subject: 49 Reply with quote

Code:


Day 1
8 votes needed to lynch

(4) The Great Crep`er: MNOWAX, Deception, Amb, Jedo the Jedi
(1) Jedo the Jedi: Garou Kinfolk
(1) Garou Kinfolk: Applesauce
(1) Applesauce: Sentran
(1) Sentran: LifeinMomland
(1) Deception: The Great Crep`er

Not Voting: Captain Zag, Aniima, ralphmerridew, itisally, jadesmar, Mackay

_________________
The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address
Sentran
Ray of Sucking Funshine



PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 4:45 pm    Post subject: 50 Reply with quote

I got some sleep and finished reading over the thread.

Undercover Monk wrote:
Code:

Not Voting: Captain Zag, Aniima, ralphmerridew, itisally, jadesmar, Mackay

I think you mean Captin Aniima, Zag...

The Great Crep'er wrote:
The way I see it, Deception built a case against me and you were okay with voting anyone off, hence the "as good as any".

Methinks TGC doth protest too much. I'm not convinced that you're play is scummy, but responses like this make it very easy for people to vote for you. I read Deception's post as justifying a day one vote as something other than RVS, not "building a case". Would you prefer he voted for you because you misspelled Creeper? FOS: TGC

I'm going to keep my eye on Zag. Since I've now watched his play as the moderator of a game in which he was scum, I know exactly how devious he can be. His dangerous gambit almost won the game for the Mafia beginning on Day 2. I don't want to be lured by his subtle direction of the town, as Jedo already noted as a possibility. IGMEOY: Zag

For the time being, Unvote. I'm waiting on people with more subject matter knowledge to give background, and I will post when I see what I feel is a reasonable scumtell.
_________________
Sentran
"Speaking of double negatives, I haven't read greylab yet today." - Lifeinmomland
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
The Great Crep'er
2% Spambot



PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 8:08 pm    Post subject: 51 Reply with quote

Sentran wrote:

The Great Crep'er wrote:
The way I see it, Deception built a case against me and you were okay with voting anyone off, hence the "as good as any".

Methinks TGC doth protest too much. I'm not convinced that you're play is scummy, but responses like this make it very easy for people to vote for you. I read Deception's post as justifying a day one vote as something other than RVS, not "building a case". Would you prefer he voted for you because you misspelled Creeper? "What might be right for you may not be right for some cause it takes....Diff'rent Strokes, it takes...Diff'rent Strokes" Go right ahead Sent, argue my POV on his dice-roll. I'll say this, embrace the diversity before warming to one side over another. Are justifying a vote and building a case exclusive of one another? Let's be succinct, as Deception said. When you "justify" a vote, over going the RVS route, would you not be placing a personal scumtell to compose a case for me being scum? My concerns were about his a. reading a little too much into a dice roll (it is a diceroll after all) and not practicing what he preached by singling me out. If you'll read the post I made with the big responses towards Deception and Amb, you'd see that with his MO at the surface being anyone who went after avoidance of a relational scumtell, something I said which could be argued for many of the RVS votes that were placed there initially. Especially Apple Sause's. In his policing of the world, he has only gone after one person so far in this game, myself.

I'm going to keep my eye on Zag. Since I've now watched his play as the moderator of a game in which he was scum, I know exactly how devious he can be. His dangerous gambit almost won the game for the Mafia beginning on Day 2. I don't want to be lured by his subtle direction of the town, as Jedo already noted as a possibility. Just because he played a good game as mafia in one game doesn't mean you should keep him at arm's length in this game. Do you have experience modding Zag as town? Some compromise between both tells would be helpful in this instance.

I'm waiting on people with more subject matter knowledge to give background, and I will post when I see what I feel is a reasonable scumtell.But by doing that you are avoiding us finding possible town tells from your posts. Would you really want that?


Some bolding is mine in that post, I will leave you all to deduce where.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The Great Crep'er
2% Spambot



PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 8:35 pm    Post subject: 52 Reply with quote

Deception wrote:
The Great Crep'er wrote:

First, I feel like you should know a few things before you try to play detective here:
1. Dice tag voting, whether you do it or not, is a very common practice in the GL mafia games forum. Go spend a day or two (when you have the time, of course) researching past games and enjoying the rich, argumentative playstyle, from day one to the end of the game. A lot of games have started their day one with one or more dice-tag votes.

In the part I quoted, The Great Crep'er implies that I need to do reserach to find out that dice tag voting is common. Thus he knows or assumes that I don't know that it is common. Thus voting me because I supposedly know it is common is a contradiction. More likely he is scum who knows my innocence yet wants to attack me for some reason. Gaahh! Go read my posts! You're not getting it, you just want to sit in denial even though I explain myself time and time again. Your whole case is predicated on some nonexistent implication I made. If you choose to receive scumtells out of D1 dicerolls, you should know that dicerolls are common, whether you had previous knowledge of it before or not! And nowhere do I say that I am voting you because you didn't know the GL mafia history of dicerolls! I am not repeating myself. Go read my posts before you make accusations like that. Also, don't frame my attacking of you as scum when you go out and call me scum initially for some poorly thought out reason on page one. If you make fire, expect smoke! All I am doing at this point is trying to have a conversation with you about the scumtells you have on me and all you're doing is conveniently dropping large parts of my post that have to deal with my suspicion of you!

Also his claim is essentially "vote me and you could die". It's a great role to draw out PRs during the day, but it should also be ignored because it is perhaps fake. Also Crep'er if you could be more succinct and not make massive wall posts, that's be super helpful. Revenge most foul![b]When I am currently the most viable target for lynching, I will be as detailed as necessarily possible addressing people's concerns. If you don't like how long my posts are and are only willing to respond to some dissected parts my advice would be to not respond to my posts at this time and wait for me to have less to address and less to post. My biggest fear right now is that we lose a potentially good town power via my death. If you had town's best interests at heart, you'd be the one expressing caution before people try to shoot off a loaded gun in here.


Bold is mine. At this point, if I survive, I'll be dodging the biggest cannonball aimed at anyone in this game thus far.

And I'd also like to ask other people to look at his posting style and how much he chooses to ignore and how much that can hurt the town regardless of my role. :exasperated:
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Amb
Amb the Hitched.



PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 8:53 pm    Post subject: 53 Reply with quote

All I can say about my post, is that I thought I was the second vote. And then all I saw was dozens of posts of "Analysis" by the Creper. This of course isn't analysis and is crazy.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address MSN Messenger
Deception
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 8:55 pm    Post subject: 54 Reply with quote

1) You are funny, you're like the guy who is yelling at everyone to calm down because a spider that no one else is worried about crawled into the room.

2) The way you explained dice tags shows sub conscious assumptions that I didn't know about the commonness of dice tags.

3) You voted me using a reason that requires I know the history of dice rolls. This is because if I didn't know dice rolls are common, which I didn't, then it is not a scum tell to react to one with suspicion.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The Great Crep'er
2% Spambot



PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 9:06 pm    Post subject: 55 Reply with quote

@Jedo: You like to speculate on what will happen based on what has happened in the past, but I'd like to acknowledge and remind you of the unpredictable nature of mafia games. In a forum that's had wall-to-wall crazy formats and a drifting roster of players coming in and out, I thought it would be easy to see that this isn't your average mafia site. I think it was very possible that another three votes could have landed on to my wagon considering the light nature with which they were tossed on and how little they were followed up to that point. I wasn't going to take the risk and let some poor soul suffer for it. It's probable that all five voting me were town, but I wouldn't doubt the inclusion of one or two scum.
BWing on D1? Maybe it hasn't failed you yet, but, hey, there's a first time for everything. It doesn't exclude it altogether, but you seem to vote with the insistence that it does. Revenge most foul! Look around, the worst case scenario is that you find nothing after voting everybody else. At least you will have tried, and that's exponentially better than this resignation about changing your vote you seem to have taken on.

*steals Deception's shoes, gives one to Mackay and one to Zag* Thank you to you two. It's become very uncommon where I don't find a post in this thread that isn't speculating to the nth degree on my actions or finds some sort of problem in my retaliations when I am simply trying to keep the town together by not killing somebody off. To hear that I'm not alone in my concerns of the pace of my wagon or that someone has faith in my words means a world of comfort to me.

And, whether you like it or not, Mackay brings about a good point in the Rupert claim. So unless you have doubts about the mod including "America's Favorite Player" in the game or are anticipating a counter, it seems like I should be put on the back burner for now on that principle alone. I don't know. Seems that way, anyways. Others noticeably feel different.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Zag
Tired of his old title



PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 9:17 pm    Post subject: 56 Reply with quote

The Great Crep'er wrote:
At this point, if I survive, I'll be dodging the biggest cannonball aimed at anyone in this game thus far.

Melodramas 'R' us?

The Great Crep'er wrote:
And I'd also like to ask other people to look at his posting style and how much he chooses to ignore and how much that can hurt the town regardless of my role. :exasperated:

I dislike this approach -- quoting someone else's huge post and inviting others to find "the suspicious thing" in it. It seems scummy to to me, as if you're waiting for someone to "agree" with you. After all, in any long post, anyone will probably be able to find something he finds suspicious.

To Jedo: a valid point (that I said I found Amb suspicious, but didn't then vote for him). Of course, your failure to vote for me would impress me with your sense of irony if I believed it was intentional. In reality, I was trying to provoke a response, either from him or others. Honestly, I don't (and never really did) think Amb would have made such an obvious and egregious mistake if he were scum.

To Sentran: I always seem scummier when I'm town than when I'm scum -- when I'm a lot more careful (and a lot less interested in actually shaking things up). But I don't overdo it, either -- I've been known to pretend to try to shake things up as a scum, too.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
The Great Crep'er
2% Spambot



PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 9:19 pm    Post subject: 57 Reply with quote

The Great Crep'er wrote:

2. It is perfectly fine to use whatever method of voting you choose to employ for the day, the problem I have with your vote (and your reasoning behind said vote) is this. a. It creates a wagon, which typically indicates at least a somewhat serious suspicion of me by you, which comes with a rather unfit, shoddily built case against me b. It is somewhat premature to go around calling people scum when you have no apparent, extra information off hand whatsoever, and you have seen just two posts from me. Your reasoning is this, my dice tag hints at a move for evasion. Okay, then why not go after practically everyone? Apple Sause used random determination for his vote, he didn't know who was going to post first before the game started, it could have been anyone from his point of view. MNOWAX and Garou used reasons that were about as personally opinionated as a dice roll, why make no comment as to the 'day one reasoning' they might be hiding behind? That's why day one reasoning is as "objective" (which I suggest you look up) as it is. We don't want to make votes based off feeling or thought, we haven't even started arguing yet.

It's one thing to make a vote based off of a whim of a reason on page 1 of a game. But to throw accusations at this point is ridiculous. How about questioning me before sending me into a semi-wagon level? How about questioning anybody else before letting a possible scummy player slip away?
I want to make a distinction between this vote and an OMGUS vote. Any antagonism for him would not play a part in this vote. He has said enough things on his own to make me question his motives. I want to know specifically why he chose to look at me over a reason that wasn't exclusive to me. A dice-tag is not sufficient, sorry.


Deception, I want you to read the bolded points, if at this point, you still feel like I voted you based on you not knowing your shit, then there is just no hope of you understanding straight forward english and I will cease conversation with you until the next day. (If I am still around that is)

And posts, in my experience, are better evaluated as a whole as opposed to one simple dissection. You just seem to have a fascination with that one little insignificant point. Something that boggles me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Deception
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 9:27 pm    Post subject: 58 Reply with quote

Oh, I did misread you.

Well I am going to vote you anyway because your claim is suspicious as well.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Amb
Amb the Hitched.



PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 9:29 pm    Post subject: 59 Reply with quote

If TGC isn't scum, then he is hogging the attention. Which achieves nothing. In other words, if he is telling the truth about being Boneham, then he is wasting our time. It allows the scum to lie low and attract no attention at all.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address MSN Messenger
The Great Crep'er
2% Spambot



PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 9:30 pm    Post subject: 60 Reply with quote

Zag wrote:
The Great Crep'er wrote:
At this point, if I survive, I'll be dodging the biggest cannonball aimed at anyone in this game thus far.

Melodramas 'R' us? Bah, it's a Rupert reference

The Great Crep'er wrote:
And I'd also like to ask other people to look at his posting style and how much he chooses to ignore and how much that can hurt the town regardless of my role. :exasperated:

I dislike this approach -- quoting someone else's huge post and inviting others to find "the suspicious thing" in it. It seems scummy to to me, as if you're waiting for someone to "agree" with you. After all, in any long post, anyone will probably be able to find something he finds suspicious.Corrections: 'my' should be 'his'. Sorry 'bout that. I wanted to say 'regardless of his role' because, really, regardless of his role, leaving out big parts of posts in arguments with other players does not typically tend to bode well for town. It's better when you can discuss all points with all people. With Deception, it's like he hears what he wants to hear. (As is evident with my current explanation of my vote for him and his unfinished argument against my suspicion of him.) It can be detrimental to town efforts if he is town and even more so if he has the ability to kill at night. (As mafia) If you wish to make a case against anybody whoever pointed out an anti-town attribute in a post, you would be alienating nearly everyone in the game.

_________________
Potato. Belgium. Eight. Random Lynch # Mafia awaits.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training



PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 9:46 pm    Post subject: 61 Reply with quote

The Great Crep'er wrote:
@Jedo: You like to speculate on what will happen based on what has happened in the past, but I'd like to acknowledge and remind you of the unpredictable nature of mafia games. In a forum that's had wall-to-wall crazy formats and a drifting roster of players coming in and out, I thought it would be easy to see that this isn't your average mafia site. I think it was very possible that another three votes could have landed on to my wagon considering the light nature with which they were tossed on and how little they were followed up to that point. I wasn't going to take the risk and let some poor soul suffer for it. It's probable that all five voting me were town, but I wouldn't doubt the inclusion of one or two scum.
BWing on D1? Maybe it hasn't failed you yet, but, hey, there's a first time for everything. It doesn't exclude it altogether, but you seem to vote with the insistence that it does. Revenge most foul! Look around, the worst case scenario is that you find nothing after voting everybody else. At least you will have tried, and that's exponentially better than this resignation about changing your vote you seem to have taken on.

I'm quite aware. Philosophically speaking, I don't have anything else to go on except my past experiences. People do things certain ways because they've discovered that they consistently work well. You don't change something unless you suspect there is a better way, and at this point, I don't suspect there is. If somebody shows me one, I will be more than willing to explore the possibilities. Until then...

As for the bandwagoning comments, you seem to be under the impression that I focus only where my vote is. Not true. When I plunk my vote down (especially my Day 1 vote), I take that time to be watching other players and their posts/reactions/interactions. Of course, I'm not going to share all of these as they come up, but I'll be logging things for later examination. Doing it like that, the attention is focused on my bold vote while I get to snoop around without people watching. A small example is Amb and his most recent posts. I won't tell you yet what I get from them, but they do peak my attention.

Finally, it's interesting you like to critique people's decisions as if they were simply wrong. Have you considered there may be two (or more) correct ways? We all have different personalities and approaches to the game which can be seen clearly in the discussions thread Zag recently started. Do the philosophies all work all the time? No. Is one necessarily better than another? That depends on the circumstances. I get that you are in disagreement with how some of us are handling this situation, but I feel like that's mostly because the gun is being held to your head.

P.S. - Meta-gaming the mod and trying to guess what he would and would not put in the game is terrible practice, especially Day 1. I don't know anything about Survivor people/history, so I couldn't evaluate well your claim even if we did have more information for comparison. However, it doesn't look like a good claim to me, and mods do historically give safe claims in themed games. *shrug*
_________________
Paragon Tally: 18 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
The Great Crep'er
2% Spambot



PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 9:49 pm    Post subject: 62 Reply with quote

@Deception: Reason for you finding my claim to be suspicious? Also, misreading my posts when you quoted the beginning 1/4th of them? :/

@Amb: Me hogging less attention can be accomplished in two ways. Lynching me (which you seem to favor, per your vote) and risking a possible town life, or unvoting me and engaging other players to add into the mix. But the thing I like about your post is that it seems to be saying less about you voting me thinking that I'm scum, but that regardless of my alignment I should be lynched (as seen by the lack of unvote) and that the town essentially go back to D1 with just a few more dead people than before.

If your issue is with me hogging the attention then you are no less of a cause of this offense by putting me under your scope with all the others who would wish to note their 'scumdar' working regularly around my posts. The way I see it? People can choose to read my posts or ignore them. They can prompt others to respond with their post and vote. It is a free country, it is a free town. I doubt if you were really concerned about letting other scum off the hook, you would be joining the TGC bandwagon and feeding into the attention. A rather pointless post, really. All you are doing is criticizing the town at large. Look out there man, say hello to people, question about what other people think of me.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training



PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 9:51 pm    Post subject: 63 Reply with quote

Zag wrote:
Of course, your failure to vote for me would impress me with your sense of irony if I believed it was intentional.

Really, Zag? I don't condemn people as scummy for a single, small thing as that, but it is something worth noting to add to a growing list of condemnations. It's just like one of your sneaky things that doesn't need to get lost in the shuffle. You're still null in my book (where everybody starts).

Deception wrote:
Oh, I did misread you.

Well I am going to vote you anyway because your claim is suspicious as well.

Interesting post. Another example of logging things while my vote sits on you, TGC.
_________________
Paragon Tally: 18 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
Deception
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 10:12 pm    Post subject: 64 Reply with quote

Reasons the claim is bad:

1) The role is a vengeful townie (shoots someone when lynched) with a twist: It shoots a person on the wagon who the Creper can't choose. Not only is it not a role the mafia will ever kill, it's a role which is going to make people think twice about lynching (don't want to get shot).

2) Role name is supposedly well known. The quickness of this claim screams "dont lynch me before I can point out my flavor name which clears me and this role which will kill one of you!".

3) Claimed way too early, but that's really in tandem with my other points.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sentran
Ray of Sucking Funshine



PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 10:21 pm    Post subject: 65 Reply with quote

Sentran wrote:
I will post when I see what I feel is a reasonable scumtell.

Let me clarify/correct that comment. What I intended to say was that I will post a VOTE when I notice a scumtell. I'm a fairly prolific poster. Well, I am in comparison to several players, but apparently I'm not on the same level as others. Shocked

I'll post more later today. I'm rather busy this weekend with personal stuff. I'll even explain that later so that people don't feel I'm using that as an avoidance tactic. Remember, anything you post or do not post will be considered or misconstrued as a scumtell.
_________________
Sentran
"Speaking of double negatives, I haven't read greylab yet today." - Lifeinmomland
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Deception
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 10:29 pm    Post subject: 66 Reply with quote

Also how is a vengeful townie that shoots a person on the wagon using a method out of control of the shooter at all protown?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The Great Crep'er
2% Spambot



PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 10:36 pm    Post subject: 67 Reply with quote

Jedo the Jedi wrote:

I'm quite aware. Philosophically speaking, I don't have anything else to go on except my past experiences. People do things certain ways because they've discovered that they consistently work well. You don't change something unless you suspect there is a better way, and at this point, I don't suspect there is. If somebody shows me one, I will be more than willing to explore the possibilities. Until then...That's...well, it's unwise, FMPOV to say the least. You don't seem to be understanding my point that while certain consistencies may show up in games, it doesn't necessarily mean that this game will be any similar. That's not to say that certain frequent occurrences may give you insight into the game, but it's poor play to close yourself off to other occasions. Do you mean to say that you wouldn't take on other styles of play and, as Socrates did, question everything unless someone told you to? It seems to be a disservice from where I'm standing. If, as a free-thinking human being with a vote equal to anyone else's (from what I've seen so far), you cannot adapt and evolve of your own accord, what can you do?

As for the bandwagoning comments, you seem to be under the impression that I focus only where my vote is. Not true. When I plunk my vote down (especially my Day 1 vote), I take that time to be watching other players and their posts/reactions/interactions. Of course, I'm not going to share all of these as they come up, but I'll be logging things for later examination. Doing it like that, the attention is focused on my bold vote while I get to snoop around without people watching. A small example is Amb and his most recent posts. I won't tell you yet what I get from them, but they do peak my attention.Fair enough. Although it would seem a bit more helpful if you shared a bit more of your thoughts as at this stage in the game, the town craves as much information as possible to better understand their surroundings and get off on the right lynch (if they can). And a different perspective on your findings can help you better understand what you find suspicious or townie about certain people and better color your future experiences down the road. It also helps to confirm that you're doing this much in depth thinking, and as a member of the town, are putting forth well-produced qualitative content and not slacking off which, down the road, can be a popularized criteria for a vote or two or even a lynch when the town has no other options.

Finally, it's interesting you like to critique people's decisions as if they were simply wrong. Have you considered there may be two (or more) correct ways? We all have different personalities and approaches to the game which can be seen clearly in the discussions thread Zag recently started. Do the philosophies all work all the time? No. Is one necessarily better than another? That depends on the circumstances. I get that you are in disagreement with how some of us are handling this situation, but I feel like that's mostly because the gun is being held to your head.

P.S. - Meta-gaming the mod and trying to guess what he would and would not put in the game is terrible practice, especially Day 1. I don't know anything about Survivor people/history, so I couldn't evaluate well your claim even if we did have more information for comparison. However, it doesn't look like a good claim to me, and mods do historically give safe claims in themed games. *shrug* We're not so different you and I. Wink Your troubles with lack of knowledge of Survivor players could quickly and be well remedied by just a little research. Look up the rosters of some the returning player games, you'll find Rupert is one of the few survivors with his own Wikipedia entry. So you'll understand if I don't agree with your evaluation that Rupert is a bad claim. On the contrary, I'd say it's one of the better claims given his Survivor Reputation if not the best.


I should best be getting off this computer now, I still have some things to do. (It's my mother's birthday tomorrow!) So, I expect that in my absence I shall be lynched and that all the people who claimed I was an early claimant shall be whistling a different tune. Enthusiastic Grin It's just a prediction, we shall see where it goes and I expect we shall receive more information on the due arrival of some of the other players.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
The Great Crep'er
2% Spambot



PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 10:44 pm    Post subject: 68 Reply with quote

And me hogging all the attention at this point is the most fitting thing that could be happening in this game! I'm Rupert for god's sake. I rarely begin a sentence where the main subject isn't 'Me, myself, and I'. The only people who could be pulling this off as well are Russell and Stephenie. It's like you are all the little Jonny Fairplays of my game running around and acting as if I'm so conspicuous.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training



PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 10:55 pm    Post subject: 69 Reply with quote

The Great Crep'er wrote:
That's...well, it's unwise, FMPOV to say the least. 1) You don't seem to be understanding my point that while certain consistencies may show up in games, it doesn't necessarily mean that this game will be any similar. 2) That's not to say that certain frequent occurrences may give you insight into the game, but it's poor play to close yourself off to other occasions. 3) Do you mean to say that you wouldn't take on other styles of play and, as Socrates did, question everything unless someone told you to? It seems to be a disservice from where I'm standing. If, as a free-thinking human being with a vote equal to anyone else's (from what I've seen so far), you cannot adapt and evolve of your own accord, what can you do?

1) I understand this game won't necessarily be similar, but nothing has given me cause to suspect otherwise. To jump ahead to the end of this paragraph, why would I adapt and evolve to something that hasn't demonstrated change?

2) Who said I was closed off? That's exactly the opposite of what I said. If there is some indication that my method of play is not adequate to the present situation, I will gladly look for a way to change with the environment. There is not yet such a thing, so I'll be continuing with my process.

3) I have questioned quite a lot of things over the years. I have played innumerable amounts of mafia games. My method of play has evolved an incredible amount over the 10+ years I have been playing mafia. Constant refinement has been done. It just happens that, at this point in my career, I have found something that works. Eventually, something will come along to damage a portion of my paradigm, and I will need to reconstruct it. That time is not yet.
_________________
Paragon Tally: 18 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
jadesmar
Bad Puppy



PostPosted: Sat Jun 16, 2012 11:59 pm    Post subject: 70 Reply with quote

Vote: Deception

For being 3rd on the bandwagon and someone I don't like very much.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Amb
Amb the Hitched.



PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 12:09 am    Post subject: 71 Reply with quote

You know what would be horribly needless, cruel, unfair and hilarious. Lynching Jadesmar on day 1 for no reason.

Actually, he has had a bad run of late. Not getting past day 1 for ... 3 games? or more?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address MSN Messenger
jadesmar
Bad Puppy



PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 3:19 am    Post subject: 72 Reply with quote

Amb wrote:
You know what would be horribly needless, cruel, unfair and hilarious. Lynching Jadesmar on day 1 for no reason.

Actually, he has had a bad run of late. Not getting past day 1 for ... 3 games? or more?


I haven't been past day 1 in 4 years.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Deception
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 4:07 am    Post subject: 73 Reply with quote

jadesmar wrote:
Amb wrote:
You know what would be horribly needless, cruel, unfair and hilarious. Lynching Jadesmar on day 1 for no reason.

Actually, he has had a bad run of late. Not getting past day 1 for ... 3 games? or more?


I haven't been past day 1 in 4 years.

LOL

Thank you, you have no idea how sad I just was until I read your post. I really needed that Felicitous
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mackay
Saviour of Spiders



PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 4:46 am    Post subject: 74 Reply with quote

TCG: you have started throwing Rupert flavour into your replies post-claim. What influenced your decision to not do so pre-claim, instead making a point of using "eat yo rice", a (correct me if I'm wrong here) Crystal Cox line, for flavour?

I am less satisfied with your posting than I was before you decided to start getting super heavy-handed with the "look at me! I'm Rupert! REALLY!" posting. If someone didn't believe your claim before, they're certainly not going to do so after such a display of desperation. Heck, I did believe your claim before, and now I'm back to neutral/undecided.

Jedo: I'm actually a big fan of metagaming (in terms of game structure guesses, etc). Partly because it's fun to speculate, and partly because it's informative to hear what people think about the potential setup of a game. When you talk about how "we" do things at the GL, who are you talking about?

Something I really dislike is when people do the whole "X is making me suspicious, but I'm not going to say why yet" thing. Withholding information is generally (though not always) disadvantageous for the town, even at such a small level. If you were to get killed then we would never have the piece of information that might help contribute to the case against a possibly scummy player.
vote: Jedo the Jedi, based on the above principle (non-pro-town behaviour), and also the fact that he is making little "hmm, interesting post here" statements and posts while not actually giving the rest of the town much to work with him on. It's also both suspicious and a little irritating (sorry Jedo Felicitous ) that he's beefing up all of his posts about how he plays the game, what he thinks is the best way to play the game, how long he's been playing the game, and how "we" do things here. It gives the impression of him contributing a lot, while actually yielding very little substance/information.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
Mackay
Saviour of Spiders



PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 6:02 am    Post subject: 75 Reply with quote

Sorry for the double post, I thought I was done but another thing stood out too:

For some reason I feel like Deception is determined to carry out a TGC lynch, and I don't know what to make of it.

It's specifically these two posts:
Deception wrote:
Oh, I did misread you.

Well I am going to vote you anyway because your claim is suspicious as well.
Deception wrote:
Reasons the claim is bad:

1) The role is a vengeful townie (shoots someone when lynched) with a twist: It shoots a person on the wagon who the Creper can't choose. Not only is it not a role the mafia will ever kill, it's a role which is going to make people think twice about lynching (don't want to get shot).

2) Role name is supposedly well known. The quickness of this claim screams "dont lynch me before I can point out my flavor name which clears me and this role which will kill one of you!".

3) Claimed way too early, but that's really in tandem with my other points.

First, I don't like that he didn't elaborate on "your claim is suspicious" until prodded. That makes it seem like it was more important to say the claim was suspicious than to prove it.

As for the explanation, I think 1 is a good point. 2 and 3, however, are pretty consistent with the behaviour of a melodramatic, overreacting player, and therefore are not very convincing points for TGC's guilt IMO, particularly in the face of what is a very strong flavour-claim. 3 in particular seems like it was just added on to make it look as though there were more 'points' against TGC. I've been out of commission a couple of years, but I think L-3 is only one vote earlier than most people would claim on day 1, right?

Anyway, I'm mostly posting this to put on the record that Deception has linked himself to TGC through his posts. If TGC does turn out to be panicking, overreacting scum, Deception may be a buddy who has veered too hard in the opposite direction to save himself.

HOWEVER: I think that if TGC is innocent, then a scum would probably not have gone for the jugular immediately post-claim - in general I think a mafioso would be more likely to watch where the tide of public opinion takes them first. So if TGC is innocent, I kind of think Deception will turn out to be as well.

Two other (less compelling IMO) possibilities:

(1) I'm getting the impression that "first bandwagon must end in lynch" is a new convention that has taken hold in the couple of years since I last played, is that correct? If so, Deception may just be following conventions with which I am as yet unfamiliar, and stretching his vote-justifications to fit.

(2) Deception could just be the type of person who makes up their mind and stubbornly sticks to it regardless of changing circumstances. I don't get that impression from his first few posts, though. Maybe jadesmar can enlighten me, I detect a history there *nudge*
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training



PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 1:58 pm    Post subject: 76 Reply with quote

Mackay wrote:
Jedo: I'm actually a big fan of metagaming (in terms of game structure guesses, etc). Partly because it's fun to speculate, and partly because it's informative to hear what people think about the potential setup of a game. When you talk about how "we" do things at the GL, who are you talking about?

Something I really dislike is when people do the whole "X is making me suspicious, but I'm not going to say why yet" thing. Withholding information is generally (though not always) disadvantageous for the town, even at such a small level. If you were to get killed then we would never have the piece of information that might help contribute to the case against a possibly scummy player.
vote: Jedo the Jedi, based on the above principle (non-pro-town behaviour), and also the fact that he is making little "hmm, interesting post here" statements and posts while not actually giving the rest of the town much to work with him on. It's also both suspicious and a little irritating (sorry Jedo Felicitous ) that he's beefing up all of his posts about how he plays the game, what he thinks is the best way to play the game, how long he's been playing the game, and how "we" do things here. It gives the impression of him contributing a lot, while actually yielding very little substance/information.

I'm sorry. You and TGC are newly returned to GL mafia. The reason I talk about the "standards" and how "we" do things is simply because, since I've been back to the Labyrinth, I feel like we rehash the same game theory with every new game. My position is almost certainly not the majority, and yet the games do generally follow the same patterns despite my saying exactly what will happen. *shrug* I'm arrogant.

As for keeping stuff to myself, we'll just have to agree we play differently, and that one is not inherently scummy. I'm not keeping everything to myself, Mackay, but I'm also not going to share everything. If I go around pointing out every little thing I find scummy, 1) there will be some things which are actually insignificant compared to the whole body of a person's posts but which is now a bigger deal because I pointed it out right away; and 2) the scum will think I'm onto them and snuff me which would prevent a more solid case later on. You disagree, and that's fine with me. I'll keep playing the way I am.

Mackay wrote:
(1) I'm getting the impression that "first bandwagon must end in lynch" is a new convention that has taken hold in the couple of years since I last played, is that correct? If so, Deception may just be following conventions with which I am as yet unfamiliar, and stretching his vote-justifications to fit.

This is something over which we argue almost every game, yes. I would prefer the first target simply be lynched, but really only to prevent half-a-dozen claims being thrown out there. Already TGC claimed very quickly, so why not others? Seriously, to go back to my first paragraph here, I understand very well the psychology of this group. TGC was not going to be lynched right there because others would have come and cried fowl about its quickness. Maybe we should give the town a little more credit on Day 1.

Another word about the claim and the scumminess of those voting TGC: Who is most likely to be scum in this group? It seems to me the people still voting him are either scum with him (and they know the claim is fake and nothing to fear) or they are scum who are taking a major risk of being killed. Both seem much less likely than scum who knew the claim was probably true and bailed out to save themselves. Now, I'm not saying any scum were on TGC, but the likelihood is scum is not still voting him.
_________________
Paragon Tally: 18 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
ralphmerridew
Daedalian Member



PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 3:43 pm    Post subject: 77 Reply with quote

TGC's actions strike me as odd... Not scummy or innocent, but odd. Day 1 bandwagons form and falter at the drop of a hat. It seems early to claim. (Well, I've thought of one possible explanation for quick-claiming. I'm not revealing it because there's not much evidence for it, and doing so would help the scum more than the town.)

I've never watched the Survivor TV series, though I've heard a few bits about it. (Like the Gervase fake-out one year.)

With 22 seasons, and 16 people per season (minus repeaters), and only 16 players, there's a lot of room for false claims. I doubt the mafia would get safe claims.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address Yahoo Messenger
jadesmar
Bad Puppy



PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 3:46 pm    Post subject: 78 Reply with quote

Jedo the Jedi wrote:

I'm sorry. You and TGC are newly returned to GL mafia. The reason I talk about the "standards" and how "we" do things is simply because, since I've been back to the Labyrinth, I feel like we rehash the same game theory with every new game. My position is almost certainly not the majority, and yet the games do generally follow the same patterns despite my saying exactly what will happen. *shrug* I'm arrogant.

The arrogant solution is to write a FAQ and hyperlink it instead of rehashing the same argument each game.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Sentran
Ray of Sucking Funshine



PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 4:25 pm    Post subject: 79 Reply with quote

To TGC the prolific...
TGC wrote:
Are justifying a vote and building a case exclusive of one another?

Absolutely. In my opinion, which is the one I tend to favor most, justifying a vote is giving a reason why you placed a vote on a particular person at a particular time. It does not have to be well-reasoned or clever, it should only be shared. Example: using a dice roll to determine your target. Building a case against someone is collecting facts about their play style, mistakes, and perceived scummy actions in order to get others to join you in their lynch. This has just over zero percent chance of working on Day 1. Day 1 is notorious for rapid bandwagons that disappear even more rapidly. I don't question your choice to claim so soon, since I believe it's every player's right to claim when and if they choose.

TGC wrote:
If you'll read the post I made with the big responses towards Deception and Amb...

Sentran, post 50 wrote:
I got some sleep and finished reading over the thread.

The fastest way for you (or anyone, for that matter) to poison my opinion of you is to suggest I have not read the thread. I ALWAYS read the whole thread, or wait until I can, before I can make what I consider to be a more informed opinion. Look back through my posts. My first was very rapid and an RVS vote, because I did not have the time to read the thread in its entirety. I even made mention of that. I even your TL;DR posts before I come up with my first major post. You'll notice you're not the only one I am looking at, and that's just the people I've mentioned. I play close to my chest, and reveal when I feel it necessary or helpful to town.

Oh, and about Zag, he himself admits that he is far better at playing scum than town. I will follow his movements carefully and see which way he is playing. I'm hoping to identify a few differences in his town vs. scum play so that I can guess which one he is. I'll be doing this for pretty much everybody. In fact, my typical opinion of everyone is that they are scum until proven (within reasonable doubt) otherwise.

TGC, I have noted that you mention some of your lines are direct quotes from Rupert. Well done. I myself am hesitant to roleplay, as I've seen it have negative consequences in the past. Besides, as I mentioned before, I do not follow the show or know the subject matter well, so I would not know how to begin.

DEFENSE OF OTHER PLAYERS:
I know this will likely get me into trouble in the long run, but I wanted to share a bit from the meta side. This is Deception's third game in GL, so he's still new to a lot of the "common" practices from here. Several of us are on a mini-vacation at present, so posting time for us is limited. That includes myself, Lifeinmomland, Captin Aniima, and itisally. We do not discuss the game outside of thread. I'm not even discussing the game with the two GLers who are not playing (Durryn and Raearia) in case we need a replacement.

I could provide pages of further analysis, but I feel these will become far more helpful in future days. In closing, I will state that following the TGC bandwagon would be very simple at this point, I'm not convinced that his posts are scummy. They area grandstanding cries for attention and have taken over the thread, but there is a fine distinction to things that are scummy and things that are unhelpful to town. I feel his posts have become the latter.

P.S.
Jadesmar wrote:
The arrogant solution is to write a FAQ and hyperlink it instead of rehashing the same argument each game.

*snerk* SO tempting!
_________________
Sentran
"Speaking of double negatives, I haven't read greylab yet today." - Lifeinmomland
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training



PostPosted: Sun Jun 17, 2012 5:27 pm    Post subject: 80 Reply with quote

jadesmar wrote:
The arrogant solution is to write a FAQ and hyperlink it instead of rehashing the same argument each game.

I guess I'm not as arrogant as I thought. Wink

I get a pretty strong town vibe from Sentran. It's mostly the tone of his post(s), I guess.
_________________
Paragon Tally: 18 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address MSN Messenger
Display posts from previous: by   
Reply to topic    The Grey Labyrinth Forum Index -> Mafia Games All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, ... 32, 33, 34  Next
Page 2 of 34

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Site Design by Wx3