| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
jadesmar
Bad Puppy
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 12:51 am Post subject: 201 |
|
|
| The Great Crep'er wrote: |
| Maybe jadesmar? jadesmar seems to make a lot of substance-less posts and is, like ralph, voting based off a very arbitrary reason. (side by side: "voting for amb for spelling TGC's name wrong"/"voting Deception for being 3rd on the bandwagon and being someone I don't like very much" |
That is not an arbitrary reason.
The 3rd person on the 1st and 2nd bandwagons have a higher than average probability of being scum. Go ahead and count. I'll wait here.
It's the first place scum like to hide. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Great Crep'er
2% Spambot
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 12:57 am Post subject: 202 |
|
|
| jadesmar wrote: |
| The Great Crep'er wrote: |
| Maybe jadesmar? jadesmar seems to make a lot of substance-less posts and is, like ralph, voting based off a very arbitrary reason. (side by side: "voting for amb for spelling TGC's name wrong"/"voting Deception for being 3rd on the bandwagon and being someone I don't like very much" |
The 3rd person on the 1st and 2nd bandwagons have a higher than average probability of being scum. Go ahead and count. I'll wait here. |
Are these findings based off the mafia history of GL or of all possible voting sequences for day 1? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mackay
Saviour of Spiders
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 1:03 am Post subject: 203 |
|
|
IMO, lurker lynches are a double-edged sword, and an option for when better alternatives are lacking. It sucks to have the quiet ones still around late in the game, because there is so little information on them and it makes it so easy for the bad guys to lead the town. But lynching one now would yield so little information - there aren't many connections/tells you can draw from someone who's been mostly ignored by all of the players, and even the bandwagon itself doesn't say much about the scumminess of those on it because "lynch all lurkers" is such an easy-to-justify vote.
I feel as though it wouldn't be a bad course of action were there no better leads, but I think there are enough interesting ties between players that we ought to pursue one of those instead. Amb, I can understand why you might disagree. That said, lynch-all-lurkers is generally never particularly bad for the town, so I'm keepng an open mind to the idea - though right now, my vote is more likely to switch to Zag than to a lurker if it seems like "lynch for the most information" isn't going to pan out. It's all in the tone of his posts - he's being all conciliatory with TGC now, too! (Plus he's at least tied into my current conspiracy theory, if not as close to the centre of it as I want to lynch. )
For what it's worth, if we're picking someone without many posts to lynch I like itisally because of this post:
| itisally wrote: |
| I read Sentran's comment on Amb's grammer as nothing more than a snarky response to a pet peeve. Both players are experianced. |
I prefer "linked with other player" to "scum tell" on day 1 so I haven't really given this much weight in my own mind yet, but I always tingle when a player decides to step in and answer for another player. It's also one of those tells that isn't affected by the alignment of the person being talked about (the talker could be either genuinely defending a buddy or trying to tie themselves to a presumed innocent), so it wouldn't annoy me with "would rather lynch X first" doubts. I don't think she(?)'s as good a choice as any one of Amb/Zag/Jedo/Sentran though. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Amb
Amb the Hitched.
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 1:09 am Post subject: 204 |
|
|
| I hereby announce my intention to vote whichever lurker gets the bandwagon. I'm stating this now, so that if I am accused over it, I will be at least accused on the basis of my real intentions and not just because I subsequently appear to be bandwagonning. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Deception
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 1:21 am Post subject: 205 |
|
|
vote jadesmar
Lurker lynch go
Also I don't like the reason she is voting me or the attempts to bait me into an argument with her. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jadesmar
Bad Puppy
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 1:25 am Post subject: 206 |
|
|
| The Great Crep'er wrote: |
| jadesmar wrote: |
| The Great Crep'er wrote: |
| Maybe jadesmar? jadesmar seems to make a lot of substance-less posts and is, like ralph, voting based off a very arbitrary reason. (side by side: "voting for amb for spelling TGC's name wrong"/"voting Deception for being 3rd on the bandwagon and being someone I don't like very much" |
The 3rd person on the 1st and 2nd bandwagons have a higher than average probability of being scum. Go ahead and count. I'll wait here. |
Are these findings based off the mafia history of GL or of all possible voting sequences for day 1? |
I bet rm could do a mathematical analysis of all possible voting sequences for day 1. But that is beyond me and also probably meaningless.
I just use the historical documents. Like this one:
http://wiki.mafiascum.net/index.php?title=JEEP%27s_Tells_for_Finding_Mafia
Which, now that you've all read, is probably less useful for future analysis. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jadesmar
Bad Puppy
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 1:28 am Post subject: 207 |
|
|
| Deception wrote: |
vote jadesmar
Lurker lynch go
Also I don't like the reason she is voting me or the attempts to bait me into an argument with her. |
Well, To be fair.. I don't like the fact that you are acting differently than both your other games that I've read either.
Or that you somehow arbitrarily assigned me the wrong gender.
Die scum. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MNOWAX
0.999... of a Troll
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 2:03 am Post subject: 208 |
|
|
| Amb wrote: |
| I hereby announce my intention to vote whichever lurker gets the bandwagon. I'm stating this now, so that if I am accused over it, I will be at least accused on the basis of my real intentions and not just because I subsequently appear to be bandwagonning. |
No cajones amb. I just do it. Of course my reputation allows me to do this, but hey.
Unvote, Vote Jadesmar.
Do NOT believe you are off the hook, TGC. _________________ The Man The Myth The Legend
MNOWAX |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Garou_Kinfolk
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 2:28 am Post subject: 209 |
|
|
| jadesmar wrote: |
| Amb wrote: |
You know what would be horribly needless, cruel, unfair and hilarious. Lynching Jadesmar on day 1 for no reason.
Actually, he has had a bad run of late. Not getting past day 1 for ... 3 games? or more? |
I haven't been past day 1 in 4 years. |
Just for the above I'm not going to join this wagon. _________________ Most posts made from my phone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Amb
Amb the Hitched.
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 2:42 am Post subject: 210 |
|
|
| Hmmm this is a quandry. Jadesmar doesnt deserve special treatment, but neither should be lynched rapid fire just like all his other games. GL mafia doesnt need another player despondent and giving up... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Amb
Amb the Hitched.
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 2:50 am Post subject: 211 |
|
|
Jadesmar (11 posts) vs Apple Sause (4 posts) vs ralphmerridew (4 posts) vs LifeInMomLand (6 posts) vs ItIsAlly (6 posts) vs MNOWAX (8 posts) vs Deception (14 posts) etc
So MNOWAX is one of the lurkers, and he joins the wagon?
So Deception is 14 posts, and attacking Jadesmar who is higher than at least 4-5 others by nearly twice (or more)
So FOS Deception
Unvote; Vote MNOWAX
He is lurking, and a clear cut hypocrite. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jadesmar
Bad Puppy
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 2:57 am Post subject: 212 |
|
|
I don't require sympathy.
I do think Deception has the highest chance of being scum. I also forgot to click the link at the bottom that said keep me updated of new posts.
So I was quiet. Not as quiet as some, but more hated than them apparently. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Deception
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 3:08 am Post subject: 213 |
|
|
Amb to clarify, I don't only think that jadesmar is a good vote because of lurking. I think that the content of his posts is lacking, and as I said before, I don't like his reasons for voting me or for his attempts to bait me into an argument.
There is a certain charm though in lynching jadesmar. Someone should make him a title. Something like "dayrole please", or something clever. I also feel bad though because it must suck never to go to night 1. So it's null for me.
Also jadesmar, sorry for calling you female, it's just that I read your name "jade-sm-are", and I know a girl named jade. I'll be more careful though. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Amb
Amb the Hitched.
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 3:09 am Post subject: 214 |
|
|
I could go either way with Deception or MNOWAX, but MNO is more blatant. I am not going to be swayed to lynch a lurker by a lurker who himself should be under pressure.
Deception is another candidate who doesnt get past day 1 that much. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Deception
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 3:14 am Post subject: 215 |
|
|
I've only played two games here, and only once not gotten past day 1 - my first game. Off site I've played quite a few games and only not gotten past day 1 once. I'm used to finding ways to clear myself and then getting night killed later in the game.
Once again, I'm not voting jadesmar just because I think he's a lurker (lurker is the wrong term, anyways). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jadesmar
Bad Puppy
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 3:20 am Post subject: 216 |
|
|
His reason for voting for me is that I am voting for him. He's fallen for the trap of being the 3rd person on the 1st bandwagon and he doesn't have the nuts to say it's an OMGUS vote (which has a certain validity on day 1).
| Deception wrote: |
vote jadesmar
Lurker lynch go |
| Deception wrote: |
Once again, I'm not voting jadesmar just because I think he's a lurker (lurker is the wrong term, anyways). |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Amb
Amb the Hitched.
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 3:22 am Post subject: 217 |
|
|
| Amb wrote: |
I hereby announce my intention to vote whichever lurker gets the bandwagon. I'm stating this now, so that if I am accused over it, I will be at least accused on the basis of my real intentions and not just because I subsequently appear to be bandwagonning.
|
| Deception wrote: |
vote jadesmar
Lurker lynch go
|
So there is the impetus for a bandwagon. I don't find that to be all that scummy, but Jadesmar is less a lurker than others. And he has good reason to lurk. Everytime he speaks up, he gets killed for it.
| MNOWAX In his 8th POST wrote: |
No cajones amb. I just do it. Of course my reputation allows me to do this, but hey.
Unvote, Vote Jadesmar.
Do NOT believe you are off the hook, TGC.
|
The scummy third vote. A lurker, with only 7 previous posts. Attacking/jumping at the opportunity to lynch a lurker.
Then if Jadesmar IS town later - guess who cops the blame! Me or Deception.
A lurker trying to make sure the lurker wagon doesn't hit him?
So Jadesmar might or might not have content. But MNOWAX does have hypocrisy, and a willingness to send anyone to the noose as long as it isn't him. Clearly his behaviour should be questioned here. Because I feel like he wouldn't have even posted had Deception not started the ball rolling.
MNO wants a bandwagon. I think he should get it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jadesmar
Bad Puppy
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 3:29 am Post subject: 218 |
|
|
| How many votes are on me? I thought 2. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Deception
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 3:30 am Post subject: 219 |
|
|
| jadesmar wrote: |
His reason for voting for me is that I am voting for him. He's fallen for the trap of being the 3rd person on the 1st bandwagon and he doesn't have the nuts to say it's an OMGUS vote (which has a certain validity on day 1).
| Deception wrote: |
vote jadesmar
Lurker lynch go |
| Deception wrote: |
Once again, I'm not voting jadesmar just because I think he's a lurker (lurker is the wrong term, anyways). |
|
!
That first quote is a misquote! Here's the full quote:
| Quote: |
vote jadesmar
Lurker lynch go
Also I don't like the reason she is voting me or the attempts to bait me into an argument with her. |
I bold the difference - Talk about posturing! The way you put it makes the second quote seem like a contradiction, but it's not! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jadesmar
Bad Puppy
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 3:33 am Post subject: 220 |
|
|
| But the fact that I'm not a lurker does actually make the first post a posturing post. As does the fact the MNOWAX voted me for lurking. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jadesmar
Bad Puppy
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 3:34 am Post subject: 221 |
|
|
| And, I think you use the term "misquote" entirely deceptively. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MNOWAX
0.999... of a Troll
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 3:44 am Post subject: 222 |
|
|
| Amb wrote: |
Jadesmar (11 posts) vs Apple Sause (4 posts) vs ralphmerridew (4 posts) vs LifeInMomLand (6 posts) vs ItIsAlly (6 posts) vs MNOWAX (8 posts) vs Deception (14 posts) etc
So MNOWAX is one of the lurkers, and he joins the wagon?
So Deception is 14 posts, and attacking Jadesmar who is higher than at least 4-5 others by nearly twice (or more)
So FOS Deception
Unvote; Vote MNOWAX
He is lurking, and a clear cut hypocrite. |
really? he has had more posts in the last two days since lurkers are starting to be targeted. and there are STILL four other people with less posts than me.
It's okay, Go ahead and vote me. I'm not worried when it is just you. _________________ The Man The Myth The Legend
MNOWAX |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jadesmar
Bad Puppy
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 3:50 am Post subject: 223 |
|
|
| MNOWAX wrote: |
there are STILL four other people with less posts than me.
|
I think the point is that I have never been one of those people. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Great Crep'er
2% Spambot
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 3:58 am Post subject: 224 |
|
|
I can't help but feel that Amb is leaving me out in potential coppings for a jadesmar lynch. Amb and others had recently brought up the hypothetical of a suggested lurker lynch, and, as much as it worries me to say it, I want to take some of the partial blame for this because I was the one to bring it into specifics by mentioning jadesmar. (So much for not singling anyone out!)
Also, while it is maybe somewhat helpful in setting apart lurkers from the main group, I wouldn't go too crazy over implementing a number of posts a person makes into a town or scum argument. It's a helpful technical tool, but in the end it should be about quality over quantity.
Oy...never a good idea to start reading over the thread and reflecting when the post count escalates like this.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jadesmar
Bad Puppy
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 4:06 am Post subject: 225 |
|
|
I like the fact that Deception was actually mirroring your idea when he voted for me as a lurker, it gives support to my theory that he is scum.
Die scum. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Amb
Amb the Hitched.
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 4:21 am Post subject: 226 |
|
|
| We need someone who isn't part of this conversation to step in. I think MNOWAX is way more scummy, as stated in my post above. I think Deception is doing what he does, and drags players out into the open. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mackay
Saviour of Spiders
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 4:55 am Post subject: 227 |
|
|
Of the two, I find MNOWAX scummier. His earlier taciturnity (I think that's a word) was uncharacteristic, and now he's kind of switched on the usual gung-ho attitude out of nowhere.
I don't know if it counts as "stepping in" if I don't vote, but you seemed to be looking for an outside perspective, so there's mine. I still don't prefer any of the lurker-lynches to a lynch of someone I actively suspect. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Great Crep'er
2% Spambot
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 5:06 am Post subject: 228 |
|
|
| jadesmar, in reference to Deception wrote: |
| And, I think you use the term "misquote" entirely deceptively. |
I think that would be fitting.
Okay, okay, jokes aside...
| Amb wrote: |
| And if he was, then his team buddies should be presumed to be lying low. |
A decent point. After all, with my large posts causing the controversy they do, it's not out of the ordinary to consider a strong likelihood that at least 1 if not more scum are the more infrequent posters so as to avoid the tangle that seems to bring to scrutiny the players within.
The flipside of this is of course that the posts seem to have drawn a variety of voices to help define the playerbase we are dealing with, and that anyone who hasn't chimed in on the issue in some way shape or form is looked at as an outside...again, not a desirable scum position.
For better or worse, this large kerffuffle over a habit of mine, seems to have united a greater part of us through compared opinions and analysis, in ways big and small. Now can't we all just get along? (Don't answer)
Anyways, after Amb's post, we have MNOWAX on post 199, in essence acknowledging the merit of Amb's idea, and I will note for future reference, the link that this provides (that MNOWAX even admits to) between MNOWAX and Amb. Whether or not it is role related remains to be seen. But I am curious to know whether this connection says more about Amb or MNO.
And, before it is brought up, I will note the brief intermission when Amb and I were on the Zagon (Zag + Wagon = Zagon) and MNOWAX was still disapproving of posts like these. Why MNO was more than willing to follow Amb on me votes and lurker votes and yet refrain from Zag...I don't know. I am curious to find out.
Hmmm.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Great Crep'er
2% Spambot
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 5:48 am Post subject: 229 |
|
|
| MNOWAX wrote: |
| Amb wrote: |
| Big ol' post about how MNOWAX was a hypocrite which I cut down to essence for size, not meant to deceive ---TGC |
really? he has had more posts in the last two days since lurkers are starting to be targeted. and there are STILL four other people with less posts than me.
It's okay, Go ahead and vote me. I'm not worried when it is just you. |
Two points:
1. I think your first point is a very common mafia game belief. That if lurkers start to change their habits once targeted, it usually sends out a signal of much more trouble down below. While it is pointed, it kind of sucks that it comes out in your retaliation towards Amb's vote. I feel like if it were such an obvious, insightful factoid that you wanted Amb to heed (hence the "really?") it would have come in your original argument against jade. When it comes out now, against one vote, it just smacks to me of (there's an overly used phrase): "Not me, that guy over there!" Yeah, it's helpful when we use examples of others to help feed into our mafia processing system, but I'm not sure how much it helps to argue Amb's point by attempting to shame others with scumtells. And for a guy you seem to maintain a townread on, you've certainly taken a second nature hostility towards him. I'm not sure I like that so much. I think if you really thought Amb was town you'd be trying to cooperate with him, not completely blowing over his point and attacking others.
2. "It's okay, Go ahead and vote me" is this really a healthy attitude to be taking on as town? (Not to mention that it was a knee jerk reversal from your earlier part of your post) I mean, we all have to respect the wishes of our faction sooner or later, but is it helpful when ideally we would have all the living members of town contributing as much as they humanly can? I'm not sure that it does much good to allow yourself to be voted like that without so much as a counterproposal or an explanation for your scummy traits. FYPOV, you're town, right? So what good does it do to simply encourage your fellow townies to vote you? As a town, we can't be perfect, but we strive to lynch mafia, and I'm pretty sure saying "Go ahead and vote me" would accomplish the opposite of that.
As for your "I'm not worried when it is just you." Really, MNOWAX. Whether you choose to share the view or not, Amb is an influential player. He's a vet, so he has the experience to divulge on the less seasoned competitors. He's evidently very persuasive, getting others to hop onto and maintain wagons. (Hell, he even got you to believe him) And so far he has had a good track record of popularizing his views. (Most recently with this lurker policy)
Let me ask you this, then: Are you worried about me, MNOWAX?
Vote: MNOWAX
Are you worried about us? Are you willing to hold a conversation with others about your play instead of being flippant about it? Do you really feel that's the best response to help your game further down the line?
(Remember, I've got long posts and I'm not afraid to use 'em! ) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Great Crep'er
2% Spambot
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 6:21 am Post subject: 230 |
|
|
| Garou_Kinfolk in post 209 wrote: |
Just for the above I'm not going to join this wagon. |
Please tell me you are kidding. It's one thing to have a townread on a player but to package it in such a way as if you're doing a favor or having pity on the frequently D1 lynched jadesmar is just ridiculous and shows that you're not taking this game really seriously. At least to the point of letting an option slip through your fingers.
And I don't think we should be worried about the despondency of jade being caused by a potential jade lynch on D1. (I remember someone brought that up, not sure who) If jade chooses to get sad over yet another D1 lynch and chooses to "give up" (Whatever that means) then that's his decision, and all his potential great games in store that he misses out on. OOG: Eventually, we all leave this site to pursue bigger, more important things. Change is a necessary part of life. Unless of course...you intend to stay forever. 0_0 (But then of course there's always death)
Forgive my elaborating on concerns that were brought up more than a few posts ago. It's just my concern that a non-issue like jade getting an early boot for the third time running becomes something people base their votes on.
I'm going to bed, feel free to bicker on and reveal more and more. _________________ Potato. Belgium. Eight. Random Lynch # Mafia awaits. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MNOWAX
0.999... of a Troll
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 6:27 am Post subject: 231 |
|
|
I think Amb is a townie doing what a good scum hunting townie would do. All i see after that is TGC allowing himself latitude to jump on the wagon.
I'm always worried about PEOPLE voting for me, I wasn't worried about AMB voting for me. There is a difference.
Unvote I will claim if there is a couple more votes that jump on me. _________________ The Man The Myth The Legend
MNOWAX |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sentran
Ray of Sucking Funshine
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 4:11 pm Post subject: 232 |
|
|
While I am usually in favor of a lurker lynch, in this instance I agree that it will yield less information than if we lynch one of the more prolific posters. Also, if we allow the mafia to redirect us from our instincts, we will end up lynching townies. I'm keeping my vote where it is for now. _________________ Sentran
"Speaking of double negatives, I haven't read greylab yet today." - Lifeinmomland |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ralphmerridew
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:13 pm Post subject: 233 |
|
|
My reasons are that I'm not very good at reading at reading more abstract emotions. I'm much better at concrete logic. I honestly can't see relations at this stage of the game, when there's almost no reality check.
One other thing, TGC: My name is "ralphmerridew". If you must abbreviate it, "rm". "ralph" is not an acceptable abbreviation. I don't recall informing you of this, so I'll let that one pass. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Great Crep'er
2% Spambot
|
Posted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 11:47 pm Post subject: 234 |
|
|
| ralphmerridew wrote: |
One other thing, TGC: My name is "ralphmerridew". If you must abbreviate it, "rm". "ralph" is not an acceptable abbreviation. I don't recall informing you of this, so I'll let that one pass. |
My apologies, ralphmerridew. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Deception
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 4:47 pm Post subject: 235 |
|
|
I don't agree that MNO being "more of a lurker" than jadesmar yet voting her for being a lurker is scummy.
You vote a lurker because he's a lurker to incite activity and because scum like to lurk when there are big arguments in the town. You can do this as a lurker and still be consistent. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jadesmar
Bad Puppy
|
Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2012 6:30 pm Post subject: 236 |
|
|
| Deception wrote: |
| Also jadesmar, sorry for calling you female, it's just that I read your name "jade-sm-are", and I know a girl named jade. I'll be more careful though. |
It doesn't appear that you will be more careful now does it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lifeinmomland
Soccer, dance, doctor's appt. this AM.
|
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 5:15 pm Post subject: 237 |
|
|
Busy couple of days but I am following along. Still happy with my Deception vote because from my perspective he is not scum hunting like he says he is.
I dislike voting a person whom I do not find suspicious but a lurker lynch might be all we get today. Since we are not under threat of a deadline I will wait to see what other information may stand out. If we end up in a lurker lynch my preference would be MNO because his play style is different this game and to me that always seems to be a tell with him. Yes I know that is meta but I have not seen anything else that is convincing to me so far so watching people for out of character behavior is what I can do. Well that and hope the scum start waving flags in my face.
 _________________ Who is John Gult? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MNOWAX
0.999... of a Troll
|
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 5:19 pm Post subject: 238 |
|
|
| Lifeinmomland wrote: |
If we end up in a lurker lynch my preference would be MNO because his play style is different this game and to me that always seems to be a tell with him. Yes I know that is meta but I have not seen anything else that is convincing to me so far so watching people for out of character behavior is what I can do.
 |
Well if my playstyle is different, and the last couple of games I've been scum, then your tell should tell you I'm town, not scum.
Vote Lifeinmomland _________________ The Man The Myth The Legend
MNOWAX |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Garou_Kinfolk
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 6:24 pm Post subject: 239 |
|
|
| jadesmar wrote: |
| Deception wrote: |
| Also jadesmar, sorry for calling you female, it's just that I read your name "jade-sm-are", and I know a girl named jade. I'll be more careful though. |
It doesn't appear that you will be more careful now does it. |
So I went back to the Game of Thrones game to see if this problem was there as well or of Deception was trying to bait jadesmar into an argument. It's there, but it seems to have gotten buried in the end of day posts as he (jadesmar) had gotten lynched. After the name issue I don't think anyone who saw it wanted to bring it up. _________________ Most posts made from my phone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
itisally
Master of Disguise
|
Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2012 6:46 pm Post subject: 240 |
|
|
| Mackay wrote: |
For what it's worth, if we're picking someone without many posts to lynch I like itisally because of this post:
| itisally wrote: |
| I read Sentran's comment on Amb's grammer as nothing more than a snarky response to a pet peeve. Both players are experianced. |
I prefer "linked with other player" to "scum tell" on day 1 so I haven't really given this much weight in my own mind yet, but I always tingle when a player decides to step in and answer for another player. |
I have two habits that get me into trouble in these games.
When someone points something out as scummy that I think is town I say so when I first get a chance to vote rather than waiting for them to reply. I only have 2 dependable posting days a week and I don't have much to say in the beginning so I post it when it comes to mind. I am no good at holding back an opinion. Sometimes this links me to scum because I have been bamboozled Sometimes it links me to a townie with out knowing it.
Second, I second guess myself too much. In the last 2 games I was town in I had voted for scum on day one by feel and then allowed myself to be swayed too easily. I really have a scum feel from Jedo. MNOWAX is next in my mind and then Deception (whose change in style may just be getting used to this site or may be a change in tactic) He is normally prettty in your face about stuff and he has normally been town and misread (or removed for annoyance -- a bad reason to lynch, or because he is distracting -- a slightly better reason to lynch but still not good)
I think Lynching TGC falls into one of those two categories. I think Most of the time scum don't interact too much on day one so the links are minimal (Amb \ Zag or whatever)
Oh and Go with "she" for me the name reads It - Is - Ally (pronounced Allie) _________________ I could agree with you, but then we would both be wrong. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|