|
|
|
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Amb
Amb the Hitched.
|
Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 4:30 am Post subject: 241 |
|
|
"Jadesmar hammering is scummy in so much that he wouldn't know it was going to happen"
What I mean is: He wouldnt know the TGC scenario was about to happen. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 12:19 pm Post subject: 242 |
|
|
Well, points 1 and 3 were in tandem. If TGC had enough time to clear the votes, jadesmar's hammer obviously wasn't that quick. You can argue coincidence, but I don't see why you would.
Point 4 was in response to Zag arguing jadesmar should have voted him earlier if jadesmar really felt Zag was scum. My point is that maybe what I wrote earlier on that page was convincing to jadesmar just like something on that page was convincing to Sentran and raekuul who switched their votes "suddenly."
Overall, I guess I can only say I never give that much credence to the scumminess of the hammer vote. I mean, everybody knows at least half of you are going to come down on the person for it every time it happens whether there was a consensus about the lynchee's scumminess or not, so it's pretty much the stupidest thing a scum could ever do. I'm pretty sure I've received flak for it when the only reason no hammer had been made was so we could keep talking, and I placed it because the discussion had wound down.
Well, I guess I better review different people so I can put my vote down and say I at least offered somebody else for when you guys lynch jadesmar. _________________ Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos
|
Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 12:57 pm Post subject: 243 |
|
|
| Zag wrote: |
UMonk, how many of those fall afoul of this qualifier? I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you didn't see it.
| Zag wrote: |
| I should have qualified the previous statement that I think it isn't as true when the first day has carried on already for 20-ish pages and people are just sick of it. But we aren't there, yet, not by a long shot, and we CERTAINLY weren't there when jadesmar thought he was putting the hammer down. |
|
actually as I recall none Zag. I think the longest was page 12ish. and that had a lot more players and therefore more posts. not much time to do a full read and response but I think Ive showed the so called quick hammer was not a scum tell. _________________ The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot
|
Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 3:32 pm Post subject: 244 |
|
|
Ok. I don't quite agree that none of them were past the "sick of this" test, but you've convinced me. unvote: jadesmar.
Also, you've convinced me with this one
| Code: |
Heroes: UM (town)
Zag (town) 1 day |
that my ability to read you should be suspect. I am officially cancelling my town read of you and moving you back to neutral. I do realize that my day 1 reads are never great. As I've said before, it is the backwards analysis after we've found at least one scum that I am good at. But I'm sticking with a town read of TGC, for now.
Having demoted jadesmar in my suspicion list, I'll go back to vote: Jedo, who never went down in suspicion. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 7:51 pm Post subject: 245 |
|
|
Well, I've looked over the more background players (raekuul, Garou, and jadesmar), and I'm settling with a vote: Garou_Kinfolk.
Reason: He really dropped off after Zag and I became the focus, and his contributions since have mostly been supplying information. That's an easy scum play where you're just bringing up things so other people can have it close at hand to use in their arguments--vote/post counts, "here's a scenario," "this person's ISO doesn't show x," etc. Also, the recurring reference to Perpentach as a lurker is another easy scum tactic where you don't have to take a stance. In fact, Garou hasn't made a stance on any of the big issues in a while. _________________ Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Garou_Kinfolk
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 9:36 pm Post subject: 246 |
|
|
Finally finished catching up. It's been a busy week IRL.
Anyway. I don't really have a read on too much right now. TGC using his power today kinda screwed the town for now as far as an information lynch goes. I still feel as if Zag is town. He hasn't been playing like he's scum.
At this point I'd be comfortable with votingTGC because he's now vanilla and at worst, we lose a townie with no power(s). At best we lynch scum. I'm actually comfortable enough with it at this point that I'll:
vote TGC
And yes Jedo, I like to post information posts so they're easily accessible for everyone. It saves time so myself and others who want to know it have it on hand without having to spend a lot of time looking up or compiling it. _________________ Most posts made from my phone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Amb
Amb the Hitched.
|
Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 10:30 pm Post subject: 247 |
|
|
Vote Garou
Far far too opportunistic. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 10:38 pm Post subject: 248 |
|
|
I'm not knocking it in principle, but when it's almost all a person is doing, it's an easy way to appear to be participating and yet not bringing anything to the table. That's something scum want to do.
I confess, it's just a Day 1 thing. It is suspicious in my eyes, but not being able to lynch Zag and see those connections is inhibiting. The field for inspection is limited. You, like TGC, have your town posts and your scum posts. Both of you have had posts where I said to myself, "That reads like town."
I also have to admit that your TGC proposal immediately struck me as a decent idea, but that fact makes me suspicious. For all my blustering about being willing to lynch town Day 1 because that's the odds, that still doesn't mean I'm aiming to lynch a townie. Plus, I really feel we should do our best to hit scum today because of the smaller format.
I'm sure TGC's flip would provide good interaction analysis (some with Zag, definitely with myself and Monk, a little with Perpentach and jadesmar), but is that added to the null read and the fact that he is either vanilla or scum enough to justify my vote? He's high profile though. The reason people like Zag and myself usually survive for a while despite our scumminess is that ultimately we are going to give ourselves away or somebody is going to be clearing us with their powers. I'm not saying town should let scum go, but we're always just town enough that it's worth it to keep us around in case we really are. I feel like TGC is sitting in this area (though his useful town contribution is currently shit).
Garou on the other hand doesn't really read like that. He started out in the spotlight, but he's quickly blended back in. I feel like he could have stayed under the radar if I hadn't brought him up. When thinking about the major discussion today (Zag v. Jedo), he's hardly a byword. If I was objectively looking at that and teasing out the interactions, I would mention myself, Zag, Monk, and TGC. Garou wouldn't even warrant a thought. That's what's causing me to be uneasy.
Well, typing all that out, I'm happy to stay where I am for now. I'm sure it will keep rolling around in my head and distracting me from the studies I should be doing, and maybe a new thought will occur to me. I encourage people to consider the things I've said and voice their own opinions. _________________ Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 10:40 pm Post subject: 249 |
|
|
I should really learn to preview edit so I can catch simul-posts.
I feel a little better seeing Amb has a similar notion to myself. Only time will tell if that's because we're both town or he's distancing (or I am for that matter). _________________ Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Great Crep'er
2% Spambot
|
Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 11:21 pm Post subject: 250 |
|
|
| Amb wrote: |
This is actually a strong reason to be angry at TGC who cleared the votes. Of all the living, Zag would have given us the most information. Contrast him with me, Raekuul, Sentran etc. You won't learn as much because we haven't been in the thick of the events so far. |
But just because you haven't been at the forefront as much as some other players, doesn't mean we shouldn't at least be trying to give every player here some semblance of a cross examination. That has been one of the most confusing cons to my move thus far because it seems to suggest not only that the town has done all the work they should do on D1 to find connections (which yields information) but that a body needs to be in the ground as soon as possible. Right now, because it is the start of the game, we have more liberties than we would as a slowly decreasing faction. So why not take advantage of it? Have some people vote Garou, have some people vote me or jadesmar. It's more important that we at least try to wring as much information out of D1 as possible through divide and conquer, because we know, once the game bridges on lylo, we are forced to show solidarity against the mafia or poise ourself into a losing position.
When lynches seem forced and race like, it's going to send some alarms. _________________ Potato. Belgium. Eight. Random Lynch # Mafia awaits. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Garou_Kinfolk
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 11:45 pm Post subject: 251 |
|
|
@Jedo. I would have made my last post whether you had brought attention to me or not. I really just hadn't had time to read or post the past few days and I don't like posting unless I'm up to date on what has been posted. If your looking for my reads that I do have, they haven't really changed since I posted them a while ago, but I'll post them again just so everyone knows where I stand at this point.
Jedo: neutral
Zag: townish
UMonk: townish
Jadesmar: slightly townish
TGC: Slightly Scummy
Perpentach/Amb: Townish
Sentran: Neutral
Raekuul: Neutral
Me: Town ofcourse :p
Have to get back to work now. _________________ Most posts made from my phone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Amb
Amb the Hitched.
|
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 4:42 am Post subject: 252 |
|
|
So the only person you have on your list as slightly scummish, is the one player whose ability is actually proven? And a player who used it on a claimed swiss army townie.
If TGC is mafia and Zag town - Zag is a threat to him. He could easily have held off and let Zag die and not looked bad for it.
If TGC is mafia and Zag Mafia - Then they are playing the same gambit that Zag tried to pull with MNO recently. It's possible. Probably not likely.
If TGC is town, then regardless of Zags alignment - he just saved his life.
In the scenarios above, the most likely outcome is that TGC is town. And you return to suspecting no one. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
3iff
very unbifflike
|
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 7:20 am Post subject: 253 |
|
|
| Code: |
Day 1, 9 alive, 5 to lynch
Deadline: SOFT for Thursday 27th September
Current Vote Count (to post 252)
(2) Jedo the Jedi: The Great Crep'er, Zag
(2) Garou_Kinfolk: Jedo the Jedi, Amb
(1) jadesmar: Sentran
(1) Amb: Undercover Monk
(1) The Great Crep'er: Garou_Kinfolk
Not Voting: jadesmar, Raekuul |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 2:12 pm Post subject: 254 |
|
|
| Amb wrote: |
| If TGC is mafia and Zag town - Zag is a threat to him. He could easily have held off and let Zag die and not looked bad for it. |
I disagree with this assessment. If this is the scenario, Zag is a liability, but also easily an asset. I mean, look how quickly Zag cleared TGC. "It's so crazy that the odds of a scum doing this are null; and if he did, he deserves to win." Come on. We as the town have every responsibility to scrutinize his motivations and attempt to catch him if he is trying to pull a gambit.
Mafia theory has so progressed that mafia have to try daring things to win. It was gutsy for us to recruit MNO in Secret Theme, but look at the pay-off. Who in their right mind would recruit MNO? You can't safely bet on him! If the town had scrutinized that situation even a little, we wouldn't have won.
With great risk comes great reward, and sometimes those risks are taken because you expect the other side to view it as too risky. _________________ Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos
|
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 3:57 pm Post subject: 255 |
|
|
Regarding the TGC mafia Zag town bit I do feel it is unlikely BUT TGC did admit he saved Zag because he felt he would be on the block next ( a huge clue that perhaps they are both mafia.) perhaps he got so sure that if Zag were to go he would be next that he wanted Zag as an easy lynch tomorow and then when Zag did flip town he could pull a huge I told you so. Its def WIFOM but it is a possible explanation.
However I really do think a garou lynch makes a lot of sense. He did kinda seem to stir up a hornets nest (though maybe not one of his own making) then slink back to hide in the bushes. And though I would love to punish TGC for making a horrible move regardless of allignment. There is enough doubt to make me want to wait it out another day or 2 since in all honesty I will probably be leading the charge on a Zag lynch tomorow.
Vote: Garou_Kinfolk for information sake alone. Most of the town has a nul read for me. _________________ The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Great Crep'er
2% Spambot
|
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 5:12 pm Post subject: 256 |
|
|
| Jedo the Jedi wrote: |
| but remember that instead of you the town would have had two cops. You for some reason won't admit that the town had a significant chance without you. |
Because my survival did not exclude two cops being in the game. You're acting as if somehow my lie was responsible for getting lynched, when it was a separate incident. You could have claimed, you could have posted better, you could have done everything in your power to avoid getting lynched D1. Instead of believing a PR who was doing everything in his power to stay alive because he knew he had a great responsibility to maintain his power, some people chose to theorize on a mafia player who would be upfront and frank to save a player that was a sinking ship as well as kill one of his own damn partners. And yes, I know, WIFOM is never a comfortable place to be, but you have to define the boundaries somewhere or be forever paranoid. You and Zag and myself just choose to put them at different points.
It'd be appreciated if you at least gave the mafia quicktopic thread a look over because quite clearly the mafia outlined that on the night rm died, their plan of action would secure a mafia win with their extra powers. If it were not for me being there and redirecting Sentran's kill, the town would have lost. Period. End of statement.
I would so love to see the scenario in which you and town go after Mackay instead of calling her town, or you and town go after rm instead of being led down the dopey path of lynching Deception whose behavior YOU explained should be taken with a grain of salt.
Now, I know you and UM would love to beat me and Zag over the ass for "weighing our survival against the town's" but I'm going to have to ask that any discussion of Survivor Mafia or any other previous game for that matter be kept to PMs, because when it isn't pertaining to scumtells -- it's just plain irrelevant. And @Jedo: I know you would love to incorporate meta into your arguments against Zag because it's how you form your decisions for next game on when to BW, and so on and so forth, but can you at least confirm with me that you know Zag delineated how he acted as scum and town in the past game when he was town? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Garou_Kinfolk
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 5:16 pm Post subject: 257 |
|
|
L-2 already. It comes up so fast in small games.
Anyway. Since I'm at this point, and the hammer tends to come pretty quickly, I'll do more of a hint then a claim. I know it won't matter to some since it's day 1, so this is for all of the others.
My power/ability would NEVER be given to a scum in a game of this size. It would make it too unbalanced in favor of the scum. I will admit that it can/would/has been given to scum in larger games though. I'd claim my character also, but that's pretty pointless with a theme like this. We'll just all have to wait until hammer/deadline for that.  _________________ Most posts made from my phone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Great Crep'er
2% Spambot
|
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 5:27 pm Post subject: 258 |
|
|
| Garou_Kinfolk wrote: |
| I'd claim my character also, but that's pretty pointless with a theme like this. |
A-hem...
| Quote: |
| Heroes and Villains mafia |
Not saying scum couldn't lie as well, but when you phrase it like that it seems like you're saying role characters can be interpreted as Heroes or Villains. I know my role character is pretty straightforward hero. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Garou_Kinfolk
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 5:52 pm Post subject: 259 |
|
|
| The Great Crep'er wrote: |
| Garou_Kinfolk wrote: |
| I'd claim my character also, but that's pretty pointless with a theme like this. |
A-hem...
| Quote: |
| Heroes and Villains mafia |
Not saying scum couldn't lie as well, but when you phrase it like that it seems like you're saying role characters can be interpreted as Heroes or Villains. I know my role character is pretty straightforward hero. |
As is mine, but how easy would it be to provide a fake claim in this theme? That is why I say name claims are useless here. It was the same with Robot Mafia. Way too many possible names to claim. _________________ Most posts made from my phone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 7:14 pm Post subject: 260 |
|
|
| The Great Crep'er wrote: |
| If it were not for me being there and redirecting Sentran's kill, the town would have lost. Period. End of statement. |
Wrong! If I had survived Day 1, Amb and I both would have been all over ralphm's sorry ass. We both pegged him. You were not the reason town won that game.
So, I'll gladly avoid bringing this up when it isn't relevant, but I have two things in response to that. 1) You don't get to perpetuate misinformation and then shut down the conversation. 2) You ignored the entire rest of that post which was actually about other things. In fact, your very statement quoted above in which you aggrandize yourself is countered by my remark that a balanced game is not made around one town PR. The fact that you keep arguing you were the reason for the town win there says you don't believe Monk made a balanced game.
This latter part goes back to what I said earlier: suppose Zag is telling the truth about his power. If we had lynched him, there still would have been about six town powers left which could help us catch scum. Your failure to remember this and think in these terms fatally flaws your play. It makes you dependent on powers when originally the game was about logic and reading posts. I suggest you shore up that area and learn not to be so dependent on powers. _________________ Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Great Crep'er
2% Spambot
|
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 7:39 pm Post subject: 261 |
|
|
| Jedo the Jedi wrote: |
| The Great Crep'er wrote: |
| If it were not for me being there and redirecting Sentran's kill, the town would have lost. Period. End of statement. |
Wrong! If I had survived Day 1, Amb and I both would have been all over ralphm's sorry ass. We both pegged him. |
Like you were in the actual game? Oh, that's right I forgot:
| Undercover Monk wrote: |
6.Deception: Jerri Manthey Town Mason, Lynched D3
7.ralphmerridew 3iff: Parvati Shallow Mafia Flirt Blindsided N3 (The night mafia were going to sew up the game. Read the damn dead thread before responding so arrogantly of yourself and Amb, you also fail to take into account that it would take more than you two (even if you did agree) to secure a lynch against rm, and you don't even acknowledge the fact that Mackay also seemed to escape your scumdar seems to be omitted from your posts.) |
I am not saying you should be dependent on powers (and I resent the fact that you think I am) but you should recognize that they help the town (as well as the mafia) where logic and reason malfunction due to human error. And I have made no secret about the fact that I thought the game was unbalanced. Right from the end of the game I said my role was OP and I do not believe it should have been included. But it is a good thing we had it, because whereas you seem to argue that hypotheticals may have led you and your merry band of other PRs to nab the rest of the scum, what happened in the actual game is quite different, and I will state once again, that if you read the dead thread and the mafia's plans you will learn that if I was not there to redirect the kill, the town would be headed towards defeat
I'll agree that games are not made on PRs alone, but the fact that you seem to not factor in any sort of importance to one role over another just boggles the fucking mind!!!!!!!
And learn to stop using your opinions as contradictions. (i.e. your view of UM's game balance) Sweet fancy christ, use the PM button. _________________ Potato. Belgium. Eight. Random Lynch # Mafia awaits. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos
|
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 7:47 pm Post subject: 262 |
|
|
And Im going to have to ask that we not pm other players during a game. The idea that past mafia games are irrelevant is ludicrous your "Alliance" buddy has used it several times while attacking Jedo. And it has been used several times to discredit several arguments. Heck I just used it last page to prove that hammers (even quick ones) on day 1 are not necesarilly a scum tell.
Everytime TGC posts I want to lynch him. This latest aside to Garou just screams scum. He handwaves away the argument he knows will come and then just takes a cheap shot and twists what Garou said. Its an argument that continues to fall on deaf ears and its important so let me try once and for all to show why claiming on day 1 is bad.
Possible scenario
well intentioned townie at L-1
well intentioned townie claims Sherlock Holmes cop
bandwagon dissolves
lying scum is at L-1
lying scum with nothing to lose claims Indiana Jones townie
bandwagon dissolves
this continues till 3 or 4 power roles have been revealed
at night mafia kill sherlock holmes
stupid town looses all their power roles
mafia wins
Better scenario
smart townie is at L-1
smart townie argues how his actions are not scummy without revealing his super awesome mega sexy role that the mafia would love to kill.
someone gets lynched mafia have to guess who has the good roles and end up killing the useless mason
smart town keeps their cop alive and wins game
TGCs perfect world
stupid scum is at L-1
stupid scum claims hannibal lecter mafia godfather
Town lynches claimed scum
town wins cause scum are stupid AND clearly never get a SAFE CLAIM.
The risk of losing the cop by lynching is worth it to keep all other power roles a secret. The cop would die anyway on night 1 because the mafia will not keep a claimed cop alive. You could argue the doc would protect him but we can not be sure a doc is even in the game. There was no doc in SURVIVOR mafia. Bottom line dont role claim on day 1. If someone does roleclaim ignore them they could be lying. If they explain why their actions are not scummy then feel free to unvote but claims should be ignored on Day 1 period. _________________ The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos
|
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 8:02 pm Post subject: 263 |
|
|
Also I will quit the game if anyone pms me about the current game and that includes any debates about mafia theory while this game is going on. Why, TGC, are you encouraging people to communicate outside the game thread. Im pretty sure that would get you modkilled.
Also you are not the reason town won TGC. The reason the town won was because Sentran claimed Bob after jadesmar did thus ensuring both him and rm would die very quickly. It took you to LoL to finally get Mackay. So don't act like a freakin hero cause you were not. You got lucky. The game while not perfect was balanced enough to go to Final 3 which is every mod's goal in balancing a game. At least I don't abandon my game half-way through. :cough Amb mafia cough: So dont go insulting someone else's set-up you arrogant prick _________________ The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 8:14 pm Post subject: 264 |
|
|
I was dead! How the fuck could I have mounted an attack against rm with Amb if I wasn't around? Now you might say I came back and could have done it then, but I was consciously starting the game with a clean slate. So, you killed the person who is according to Zag very persuasive and good at manipulating votes. (Don't let the fact that he uses that in reference to when i am scum make you think I'm not also good at doing it as town--I'm great at whipping up support for my lynches.) Therefore, I couldn't have helped lynch rm.
Now, I overlooked you thinking the game was unbalanced. That does explain why you hold so fast to your own superiority there. However, almost everybody else believed it was balanced. (Their qualm was with a mechanic that could have happened but wasn't actually exploited.) So, I really don't know why you continue to hold to that. In fact, from your perspective, I could argue that you should have let yourself die so the game would be balanced. Sheesh. (And I did acknowledge that Mackay escaped my scumdar, but I also came around to it in the dead thread before she was lynched. Maybe you should read that stuff.)
To assist Monk's analysis--that is, reduce some of the sarcasm--the scum aren't going to claim something bad. I think Zag's claim would be a really great fake claim. (He doesn't have to produce cop results for every night and somehow explain why the mafia are keeping him alive all the way to Lylo.) Scum know there are people like you, TGC--most players--who are so worried about lynching a power role that the scum just claim doc or cop and save their ass while the town unvotes. It's an easy thing to do; and every day the scum stay alive is another day they even the odds. _________________ Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Great Crep'er
2% Spambot
|
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 8:20 pm Post subject: 265 |
|
|
And that's about all I needed to hear for me to get offended. I didn't attack you personally based on the balance of the game, all I said was that it was unbalanced because one role negated all mafia actions in one night. Pobody's Nerfect. There were protective idols involved, votes-connected, and other additional mafia powers that factor into this argument, so don't use the Sentran deal to refute that. And realize that my continued stay in the game didn't exclude Jedo and Amb from going after rm like he said they would.
The remark didn't need to enter the game, period. Yet it did. I apologize if what I did still eats at you, but the reason I'm here at all is to start anew, and apparently that can't happen until I eat some more shit for what I did in the past. I don't blame you for hating me for it, but it is confusing considering you seemed to be all on board for my entrance into Survivor Mafia.
The game's gotten way too personal, for me anyways, so I feel like there should be some sort of hiatus to cool down before I return to this. @Mod: I don't want to flake, and I don't intend to. I'll return after a few days, but if you can't accept that, I understand. I'll honor the agreement, because I know what it's like to run a game that no one wants to succeed.
Unvote |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 8:21 pm Post subject: 266 |
|
|
And now it's personal...
Still, I want to remind you that this protracted discussion about the Survivor Mafia game is not just about theory or trying to browbeat you, TGC. I'm trying to use that as an example that roles claimed on the first day are 1) sometimes powerful fake claims by scum designed to cause the town to unvote and 2) not the lynchpin power necessary for the town's survival. My discussion about this is very much based around what has happened in this game. _________________ Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Garou_Kinfolk
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 8:45 pm Post subject: 267 |
|
|
MOD: With your permission, can we lock the thread for a 24 hour period and get a 1 day extension on the deadline as a result? I believe tempers are running too high and need a short time to cool off. _________________ Most posts made from my phone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 8:55 pm Post subject: 268 |
|
|
3iff can obviously do whatever he thinks is necessary, but I don't think there's any need to stop the game. Most of the town is actually unencumbered by the personal comments and still needs to weigh in on the issues. Besides, we really just need a reminder:
| Rules wrote: |
- Don't be more of a jerk than absolutely necessary.
- Don't take anything personally (outside the game that is). If someone is being a jerk inside the game, it might be part of their role. |
_________________ Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sentran
Ray of Sucking Funshine
|
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 9:03 pm Post subject: 269 |
|
|
Once again I am alone in my votes and reads. I have so many posts from over the weekend that I feel the desire to respond to that I can't POSSIBLY get to all of them without multi-page wall posts. Here are a few of the highlights.
TGC (or whoever asked it): JOAT stands for Jack-of-all-Trades, aka Swiss Army Townie.
TGC, re post 256: Because of this post alone, Unvote, Vote: The Great Crep'er. I disliked the comments of play better when they were first brought up. Playstyle is subjective, and telling somenoe to play better is about as useful to telling them to be taller. Scumreads are also subjective, and by claiming that better play would not have seen them lynched, you are perpetrating a falsehood. The scumreads are there for some people, whether the player is town or scum. Scum are actively trying not to make scumtells, and townies are actively trying to catch scum. Whether or not the person is scum has nothing to do with whether or not other people will find reasons to vote them. Some are fabricated, most are not.
Same post, second paragraph: Although not directed at me, commenting that another player should have read more closely is a pet peeve of mine. Finally, looking at previous games provides a pattern of play. Those can occasionally be used to the scum's advantage to paint townies as scum, but more often can help the townies to find scum.
Oh, you can always add in the comments about PMs (bad idea) and my previous thoughts about why a scum TGC would protect a town Zag. Not saying that it's the case, but the possibility exists.
Garou, teasing at a role without claiming is baiting, in the hopes that the town will be easily swayed into not voting you. It makes you appear more scummy, and moved you up in my scum-o-meter.
Pre-post edit: I agree with garou that a cooldown may be in order. Tempers have flared way off the scale for what is reasonable. _________________ Sentran
"Speaking of double negatives, I haven't read greylab yet today." - Lifeinmomland |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Amb
Amb the Hitched.
|
Posted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 9:24 pm Post subject: 270 |
|
|
| Agreed. Please calm it down people. These sort of posts are exactly why I don't play on mafiascum which takes the game far too seriously. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
3iff
very unbifflike
|
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 7:19 am Post subject: 271 |
|
|
As tempers are getting frayed, I shall remove the deadline for now and ask people to calm down.
The rules include...(I see Jedo has pointed these out)
• Don't be more of a jerk than absolutely necessary.
• Don't take anything personally (outside the game that is). If someone is being a jerk inside the game, it might be part of their role.
and DON'T discuss this game via PM with other people, unless it's me.
Finally, try to stop digging up indiscretions from previous games.
Thankyou. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Undercover Monk
Professor Chaos
|
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 7:20 pm Post subject: 272 |
|
|
TGC Im sorry my last post was overly defensive and totally crossed a line. I wasn't bashing you for abandoning the Amb game and I was genuinely excited to have you back and still am. I reacted badly to critiscism. I felt at the time you were going after me unfairly. Its the diference between saying someone hit some wrong notes and saying they are a bad singer. I snapped and for that Im sorry to every player that does not help us lynch scum. So chalk up post 263 to loosing my temper. But I stand by post 262 about claims on day 1. (Even if it was a little on the sarcastic side. I am up for a Garou or TGC lynch. Thats where I am at sorry again for the disruption. _________________ The Classic Blunders:
1. never get involved in a land war in Asia
2.Never go in against a Sicilian when DEATH is on the line
3. Never release Peyton Manning |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Amb
Amb the Hitched.
|
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 8:16 pm Post subject: 273 |
|
|
| In the meanwhile, I don't think that any of our leads is particularly great. But of all of them, I'm happiest with a Garou lynch. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Zag
Unintentionally offensive old coot
|
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 8:51 pm Post subject: 274 |
|
|
Could we get a vote count?
I'm ok with a Garou lynch. I did find his non-claim to be a little suspicious, but otherwise have no real opinion on him. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Garou_Kinfolk
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 10:22 pm Post subject: 275 |
|
|
| Zag wrote: |
Could we get a vote count?
I'm ok with a Garou lynch. I did find his non-claim to be a little suspicious, but otherwise have no real opinion on him. |
I know I'm at L-2 and TGC is at L-3. If there's votes elsewhere, they're lone votes. 3iff can do a more complete, and official, vote count tonight.
If people wish to vote for me today, there isn't much I can do at this point to change their minds. I can't argue that information won't be gained because it will. I'm not giving up yet though. Other then information, is there any other reason I have votes on me? I'd like to rebuttal if possible. Thanks.  _________________ Most posts made from my phone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Amb
Amb the Hitched.
|
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:27 pm Post subject: 276 |
|
|
| Garou wrote: |
If people wish to vote for me today, there isn't much I can do at this point to change their minds. I can't argue that information won't be gained because it will. I'm not giving up yet though. Other then information, is there any other reason I have votes on me? I'd like to rebuttal if possible. Thanks.
|
This pushes dangerously close to the despondency tactic that Jedo knows all about. It doesnt quite cross the boundary though.
If you are genuinely town, giving up is definitely not the right course of action. I know you said you aren't giving up, but it sure feels like it.
As I said before, the case against you is the best of a bad bunch. But it likewise shouldn't be dismissed.
| Garou wrote: |
| At this point I'd be comfortable with votingTGC because he's now vanilla and at worst, we lose a townie with no power(s). At best we lynch scum. |
This is both opportunistic and lazy. It seems too cavalier. TGC is vanilla, so lets kill him. It also means you aren't interested in trying to actually find scum.
But then, as if you hadn't given me that vibe with that post: Your next one had this:
| Garou wrote: |
Jedo: neutral
Zag: townish
UMonk: townish
Jadesmar: slightly townish
TGC: Slightly Scummy
Perpentach/Amb: Townish
Sentran: Neutral
Raekuul: Neutral
Me: Town ofcourse :p
|
Every single player listed as town, apart from the one you list as slightly scummy. Then if TGC flips town, you can justify it by saying "It was marginal". It also gives me the impression that you aren't really looking. 3 Neutral, 4 townish? Really? You dont find any of the players looking at you suspicious? Even in your last post, you haven't even raised an eyebrow at UMs quote "Vote: Garou_Kinfolk for information sake alone. Most of the town has a nul read for me".
To me, this is as strong a case as you will get on day 1. But you (and only you) could build a reasonable case on UM right now. But you don't seem to be interested in trying. And that could be because you know in your heart that UM is town.
But I can be persuaded that I am wrong. The case built here isn't iron clad. Either find us a better one, or build a decent rebuttal. Better if you can do both. As it stands, my vote remains. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:57 pm Post subject: 277 |
|
|
I think that was a good restatement of Amb's case against you--as well it should be!--and my own reasons include his to some extent. Mine is that you haven't taken a stance, and you seem to be hitting from the sidelines without ever stepping into the spotlight. That's shady. You could probably give some sort of response about it being "just Day 1," but obviously other people have found things here on Day 1 to take a stance on. These are good things the town can look back on in later days. As I said when talking about you, if I were to look back at the big events of this day, I probably wouldn't even think of you and that's not really a good thing. _________________ Paragon Tally: 19 mafia, 3 SKs (1 twice), 1 cultist, numerous chat scum...and counting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Garou_Kinfolk
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 3:10 am Post subject: 278 |
|
|
Currently working on the rebuttal. Thanks for replaying. I'm also planning on going back and re-reading the day so far... if the day lasts that long. _________________ Most posts made from my phone. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
3iff
very unbifflike
|
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 7:06 am Post subject: 279 |
|
|
Latest vote count.
| Code: |
Day 1, 9 alive, 5 to lynch
Deadline: None
Current Vote Count (to post 278)
(3) Garou_Kinfolk: Jedo the Jedi, Amb, Undercover Monk
(1) Jedo the Jedi: Zag
(1) The Great Crep'er: Sentran
Not Voting: jadesmar, Raekuul, Garou_Kinfolk, The Great Crep'er |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
raekuul
Lives under a bridge & tells stories.
|
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 11:05 am Post subject: 280 |
|
|
I'm going to wait for the rebuttal before putting Garou at L-1. If the town wants to lynch him without me, then I wash my hands of this. If the town decides to wait for me, then I'll take the risk of hammering a townie who clearly does not want to play.
I know that I haven't said all that much this day, either. I've been able to stay off of most people's scumdars for the time being (I wonder how that will change with day 2), which is where I'm happy being.
Garou: Make a name claim anyway. You don't have to give away your role, It'll probably be obvious what role you've got anyway - and it won't be difficult to suss out fake claims once we hit the mass-claiming stage. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|