|
|
|
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
mathgrant
A very tilted cell member
|
Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2002 8:43 pm Post subject: 1 |
|
|
I had a dream that I was playing the Pokemon Card Game with a statistician. He left the room while we were playing, and I was losing. I was tempted to look at his cards, but decided to do something with my own cards instead. I had Weezing, Squirtle, and Pikachu on my Bench. I shuffled them thoroughly (tough to do when you only have three cards!) and chose one at random. Then I got out a sheet of paper with the numbers 1 through 6 and wrote next to the 1 the name of the Pokemon I chose. I did this five more times, writing each new Pokemon next to the next number.
Now, as we all know here at the GL, that would be a great technique for generating a random number between 1 and 729, but that wasn't what I was interested in. I then rolled an evenly weighted 6 sided die and whatever Pokemon was next to that number, that would be the Pokemon I would use after my current one was Knocked Out. But before I could see the number, I woke up!
Oh no! I thought. Which one was I about to choose? Well, I couldn't be totally sure, I never saw the number, best I could do was remember what Pokemon appeared in each slot on the paper and use simple statistics to estimate what could've happened. But oh no! I couldn't remember anything! Except that each Pokemon was in at least one of the six slots. And Weezing appeared at least twice. But that was it.
I then proceeded to calculate, with only that information, the probability that I would've chosen Pikachu. I went back to sleep and had the dream again. The statistician seemed to be a better psychic than Miss Cleo; not only did he know what I did when he was away, he even knew what had happened when I woke up. I told him the probability I had calculated, and he was impressed at my statistics skills. He then resigned the Pokemon game and started having a talk with me about statistics instead.
That was the best dream I'd ever had in my life. Now, two questions:
1. What was the probability of me choosing Pikachu?
2. Hidden somewhere in this problem there is a reference to a famous graph theory chestnut. What is it?
[This message has been edited by mathgrant (edited 02-13-2002 03:56 PM).] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ZutAlors!
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2002 9:26 pm Post subject: 2 |
|
|
| 1. How about 15/54? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chuck
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2002 10:08 pm Post subject: 3 |
|
|
| 1. Maybe 7/24? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mathgrant
A very tilted cell member
|
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2002 1:03 am Post subject: 4 |
|
|
| Number 1 was answered correctly by: Chuck |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chuck
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2002 1:21 am Post subject: 5 |
|
|
| Graph Theory has chestnuts? That's hard to believe. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mathgrant
A very tilted cell member
|
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2002 5:08 am Post subject: 6 |
|
|
| But it does. Can you find one? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ZutAlors!
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2002 12:41 pm Post subject: 7 |
|
|
Ok, what am I missing?
Step 1: "...each Pokemon was in at least one of the six slots. And Weezing appeared at least twice" = without loss of generality, assume slots 1-4 are WWSP.
Step 2: Slots 5 and 6 are equally likely to be any of the Pokemon. Therefore, there are nine possible combinations, all equally likely: WWSPWW, WWSPWS, WWSPWP, WWSPSW, WWSPSS, WWSPSP, WWSPPW, WWSPPS, and WWSPPP.
Step 3: Given any of the above combinations, the probablity of choosing Pikachu is simply (#P/6), which is, in order, 1/6, 1/6, 2/6, 1/6, 1/6, 2/6, 2/6, 2/6, and 3/6.
Step 4: Total probability is then (1/9)*(1/6 + 1/6 + 2/6 + 1/6 + 1/6 + 2/6 + 2/6 + 2/6 + 3/6) = 15/54 = 5/18
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ralphmerridew
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2002 1:04 pm Post subject: 8 |
|
|
| I figured out what the chestnut is, and I will say that it involves the three pokemon cards. Figuring out the chestnut will require some knowledge of pokemon. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
extropalopakettle
No offense, but....
|
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2002 1:22 pm Post subject: 9 |
|
|
ZutAlors!, I haven't done the math, but I'm suspicious of step 2.
Let's say I perform a large number of trilas where I randomly fill the 6 slots with W's, S's and P's. I only consider those trials that have at least 2 W's and at least 1 each of S and P - all other trials are discarded. Now remove 2 W's and 1 S and 1 P. There are nine possible combinations for the remaining two cards - WW, WS, WP, SW, SS, SP, PW, PS, PP. But I'm not sure all are equally likely. The reasoning being along the same lines as, if I flip two coins, and at least one is heads, the probability of two heads is 1/3 (not 1/2). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tigg
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2002 1:40 pm Post subject: 10 |
|
|
I got the exact same answer you did, Zut.
Did we make a bad assumption? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tigg
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2002 1:51 pm Post subject: 11 |
|
|
I'm starting to think your step 1 was our bad assumption. Looks like there IS a loss of generality.
extro's example of the two coins makes a good point. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ZutAlors!
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2002 4:14 pm Post subject: 12 |
|
|
| Ah, OK. This is akin to the famous "A couple have two children; at least one daughter; what are the chances they also have a son?" I should have realized it wasn't as easy as I thought. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mathgrant
A very tilted cell member
|
Posted: Thu Feb 14, 2002 10:08 pm Post subject: 13 |
|
|
| So, what's the graph theory chestnut I'm looking for? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mole
Subterranean Member
|
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2002 1:04 am Post subject: 14 |
|
|
The one with the three houses and the gas and water and stuff? That's the only one that comes to mind - can't see it here yet though  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mith
Pitbull of Truth
|
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2002 2:50 am Post subject: 15 |
|
|
| weezing=gas, squirtle=water, pikachu=electricity |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mole
Subterranean Member
|
Posted: Fri Feb 15, 2002 2:53 am Post subject: 16 |
|
|
| Gas isn't a type of pokémon, is it? Maybe all these houses want to be connected to the poison supply... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|