reviving an old thread idea

[pikachamp]

describe the thread above you!!!
an introduction

[Lepton]

The second-last post in this thread.PLEASE PEOPLE, HAVE MERCY UPON OUR SOULS!!!!

[Vegtable2001]

Is reduced to using the old "talk about the thread above you's location" trick in order to justify it's existence.

[Mackay]

The post that screwed up Lepton's idea of destroying this thread before it got over 2 posts.

[PhantasyStarOnline]

Helped destroy Lep's plan, along with Mackay.

[Lepton]

One of the three posts in this thread that do not follow the rule.
Also, incomprehensible.
Also, the new second-last post in this thread.

[Mackay]

Made by a Canadian sexpot.

[Lepton]

contains a typo
Should read "despot" or "sextant".

The third-last post in this thread.

[This message has been edited by Lepton (edited 06-17-2003 11:27 AM).]

[Bicho the Inhaler]

[npot]I think the point is to describe the thread above this one. At least, that's what it says.[/npot]

[Lepton]

[npot]I was hoping, vainly I guess, that it might be slightly more interesting than that. Oh well[/npot]

[pikachamp]

[npot]i did say thread[/npot]
very geeky

[Coyote]

Hmmm...three in a row. You know, by this time One might begin to question the point of putting in the bracketed disclaimers. They're clearly as much a part of this thread as any other post.

That being said--pika, do you by any chance remember exactly who it was that started the original version of this thread? If so, does that not create even the slightest hint of Cognitive Dissonance in your electro-rat brain??

Ah well. To keep with the original spirit of the thread, I'll just say:

Currently, too much content, not enough form.

------------------
When in danger, when in doubt,
Run in circles, scream and shout.

[This message has been edited by Coyote (edited 06-18-2003 08:08 PM).]

[The Cruciverbalist]

Much longer than this one.

[pikachamp]

[npot]what's that?[/npot]