Lord of The Rings thread 2 [FINITO!] post game blabber occur

[Porro]

Post 990 looks pretty definite to me. On the basis of that I'd say Logain was the other dwarf, but I'm still reading...

Whilst q voted for amb early, the evidence was pretty much against amb at that time, and rather than just voting amb like the others, Dameleon's claim that 'amb is lying' about Logain being a killer, definitely points to Damelion not only wanting to kill amb, but also exonnerate his compatriot.

[Porro]

I've just noticed your last post Diplomat, and I agree.

The mod's a bloody fool. The info provided on Sooth could have enabled another player to blag that they were Pipin. I'm just glad no-one seemed to have spotted that.

BAH @ MAC!

[Porro]

I'm starting to get a bit worried that there are 3 bad guys left
Diplomat has done a lot of lurking, and unless I'm wrong he only ever voted for Leonidas in the first 3 days, then jumped on Neo's Bandwaggon on the 4th. Could he be a SK?

If that is the case then how about we vote for Quail today, then hope q and Dip bump each other off tonight

[Porro]

Ok.
I admit I only got up to page 2 of the second thread, but, since Sami and Fezik very rarely posted before they died, it's hard to link them with other potential orks. I think Mike Amok spotted the link between Dameleon the dwarf and Logain, and saw through Q's lie. So my order of players from innocence to guilt is:

MA and myself (100%)
Logain (95%) loses 5% due to lurking
Diplomat (80%) just a feeling, along with a bit of lurking (little voting)
quercitron (30%)(but I'm still open to persuasion)
Quailman (1%) Die mafia scum.

But befor I vote Q, I'll wait any comments from other players who may be checking the thread. Since it's the week-end, I'll give you lot until Mondayish to respond. Unless MA comes back with even more revelations.

Go town

[Macros]

vote count:
Vote count
1 quercitron (logain)
1 Logain (Quercitron)


no as to the fellowsip roles, well i fully intented to keep the secret, to protect the knowledge of the force votes, and the like, but IS thoroughly blasted that out of the water.

[Diplomat]

I doubt there are three bad guys left. If this is so, Quailman, quercitron, and Logain would all have to be evil. Besides, the number of kills in the last few nights doesn't justify there being a serial killer. As for me, I believe I voted for plenty of bad guys. I remember voting for Werebear, HyToFry, jadesmar (but not on the day he was lynched), Leonidas, and several others.

So, I agree, we should vote off Quailman today and probably quercitron tomorrow. Maybe we should starting voting for Q so he would say something.

[Mike_Amok]

No more revelations here. Vote: Quailman.

[Porro]

Vote: Quailman

[Logain]

Mike_Amok, as far as I'm concerned, both quercitron and Quailman seem to be evil and would most definitely be the last two left. Quailman mainly cause his alibi sucks, quercitron because he is definitely lying. I'd feel better about lynching quercitron only because I know for a fact he is lying, while Quailman I'm just assuming is evil.

As far as I'm concerned I don't see anything happening between now and tomorrow that will change my vote, so the question is if one of them is not evil, would it make a difference if we lynched the wrong person today or tomorrow?

If we lynch a good guy tonight and there are two evil people left, then the town loses. If we lynch a good guy tomorrow, then the scenario will end with one evil and one good guy remaining during daytime. Does that end in a stalemate then?

I'll change my vote if either a majority or Mike_Amok (whom I trust most at this point) really thinks it's the best course of action.

[Porro]

Careful Logain, you're starting to look like you're trying to protect Quailman.

To myself, and quite possibly the other townies, he appears more likely to be mafia than q.

The main evidence against q could have been misinterpreted by us. If you are the third mason, when did you do a post firmly defending one of your colleagues?

We're baseing your innocence on the fact that each of the other dwarf masons posted firmly to defend a fellow mason.

I'll stick with my vote for Q for that reason, unless you cane give us some more evidence in your defence Logain.

[Macros]

Vote count:
1 quercitron (logain)
1 Logain (Quercitron)
2 Quailman (mike_amok, porro)

speed it up here and lych someone

[Logain]

Porro, I wasn't defending Quailman, in fact I was trying to say that if we lynched quercitron this round, I would almost assuredly vote Quailman next round. Think about it from my perspective...in which I know quercitron is lying which means I am 100% sure he is evil. I can only assume Quailman is evil at this point. My question was, would the outcome of the game be different if we lynched a wrong person tommorow as opposed to today.

As far as proof for backing up Arminger and Damelon? No, I have none, and that's basically cause they were never in jeopardy of being lynched. I don't even recall either of them getting any votes at all before they died.

Oh well, I'll take my chances since I think a 1-1 good/evil stalemate during the day would still end in an evil victory at night...maybe Macros can at least confirm that.

Unvote: querciscum
Vote: Quailman

[Quailman]

You idiots! If you can't see that Diplomat is the other scumbag, in addition to one of the two Gloins, then you deserve your fate. One won't bump off the other, and I don't know which is bad or good. But Diplomat's decription is too fake, and he seemed way too innocent (ignorant) when he wondered how when Macros had posted the e-mail about the Mason group.

vote: Diplomat

I'm off the hook for voting with the bandwagon when it's directed at me.

[Mike_Amok]

You know, I was assuming that a voting stalemate would result in a win for the mafia, but now I remember that Macros called whatever mini game he modded on mafiascum a draw with 1 town and 1 mafia on the last day. So Macros, would the result be the same in a similar situation in this game?

Of course, I would much rather actually win this, anyway.

[Diplomat]

Vote: Quailman

[Werebear]

Diplomat? Day 2 everyone voted for me. It was the "in" thing to do that day. *grin*

Werebear

[Porro]

Aren't you supposed to be a bearskin rug?

[Bear Skin Rug]

Sorry! This better?

[quercitron]

Hmm, looks like Quailman's lynched. If not, vote: Quailman

[Mike_Amok]

Oh yeah. FOS: Werebear for not voting Quailman. C'mon, dude, it's the new "in" thing.

[Diplomat]

Trying to divert the bandwagon at the last minute, Quailman? Well, I can't blame you for trying.

[Bear Skin Rug]

Oh! You didn't say it was the new "in" thing! As long as it isn't that jumping off the bridge thing again. I said I wouldn't do that unless you asked me nice.

XWerebear

------------------
...So now you think you can walk all over me, huh?

[Porro]

How about a tall building?

[Bear Skin Rug]

Um.... OK!

[Macros]

oh sure, post loads of questions when im away for crying out loud!
if it was a stalemate at day, hmmm, i'd probably call it a mafia win in this case.

thats 5 for the quailster, definately a lynching.
silly town
you lynch trrebeard, ent, gaurdian of fanghorn.
how foolish of you

[Macros]

NIGHT 72 hours for choices!

[Lucky Wizard]

Okay, after this game is over, I will be rather curious as to why Quailman claimed a fake role instead of his good-guy real role.

[Leonidas]

Tsss.

I knew the ents were the way to go.

[Bear Skin Rug]

ROFLMAO, Leonidas. Probably he claimed a fake role, because it really doesn't do to come out and say "I'm the last doctor". Just a guess.

Werebearskinrug

------------------
...So now you think you can walk all over me, huh?

[Quailman]

I was a good guy?

[Porro]

You were a burk!
You just cost the town victory moron :/

[Meriadoc/Mackay's ghost]

Yes Quail, very well done.

[Porro]

Originally posted by bear skin rug:

---

ROFLMAO, Leonidas. Probably he claimed a fake role, because it really doesn't do to come out and say "I'm the last doctor". Just a guess.
Werebearskinrug

---

It was a stupid thing to do in the circumstances though!
And if Q had to claim a false role, he could have chosen one which wasn't so seethrough!

[Porro]

AAARRRGGGGHHHHHHH!!!!
It's a good job there's an ocean seperating us Quailman!

[Porro]

AAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!

I need a brick wall to bang my head against

[Bear Skin Rug]

Now I know why he did it. To drive Porro insane. It all makes sense now.

[Macros]

it was pretty pointless running this night, but i wanted to see who they would kill.

Logain th efinal dwarf gets it.

Diplomat
Mike_Amok
Porro
Quercitron

are left, Quercition and Diplomat are victorious, if today ends in a tie vote, they win by killing tonight, if today wins by a majourity vote, they win, as they arent going to vote themselves on the verge of victory. and even if they did, it would turn to nigh,t another townie dies, then its back to stalemate. a very lukcy victory, fueled by quailmans bizarre role claim.
indeed.

the game has ended, let the post game jabber commence, please, state your critcisms openly, as long as its semi-constructive, i know i made several errors.
all roles are being posted now.

[Mike_Amok]

Right, well. That's too bad. Would've been fine if Quailman had known he was on our side.

So one game ends extremely luckily for me (Salem), and one ends extremely unluckily (this). Strange times indeed.

[Antrax]

I'm assuming Quailman couldn't protect himself?
I think the game had too much contrl going on, I was very upset with people continously being coerced into voting me and my target choices constantly being made for me. Denying the players too much freedom leads to a dull game, IMO. Luckily, I died early.
Antrax

------------------
"If it comes down to a choice between being unloved and being vulnerable and sensitive and emotional, then you can just keep your love." -Victor Mancini, "Choke"

[Quailman]

I was originally told that I had an option of investigating or killing a player each night. I sent an investigation choice the first night and got no response whatsoever, so I started killing each night after that. I was the one who killed cello (she was bad, wasn't she?).