| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Neo
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2003 10:37 pm Post subject: 81 |
|
|
marker
5 mac (GARM, Gaspode, jadesmar, Leo, Faerie)
2 FaerieFire (Antrax, MacadamiaMan)
2 SaberKitty (crackerjack, Hitchhiker)
1 Darkblade (jesternl)
1 JEEP (Dragon Phoenix)
1 jesternl (Darkblade)
1 Mackay (SaberKitty)
1 ralphmerridew (Polotet)
Today is Friday, I'll set a Sunday deadline. 5 PM GL Time. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jadesmar
Bad Puppy
|
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2003 10:42 pm Post subject: 82 |
|
|
unvote: MacnuT
I believe him. Is there another bandwagon?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ralphmerridew
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Fri Mar 28, 2003 11:10 pm Post subject: 83 |
|
|
| Let's see if, as Antrax says, FaerieFire breaks under pressure. Vote: FF |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GARM
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2003 12:24 am Post subject: 84 |
|
|
Unvote: MacN I believe him too
It also appears Vote: FF is our next Bandwagon target. Is there ever another way to get thru Day 1?
GARM |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jeep
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2003 12:47 am Post subject: 85 |
|
|
Neo, I am waiting on a response to my e-mails...
-JEEP |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ralphmerridew
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2003 2:27 am Post subject: 86 |
|
|
| Well, GARM, there is the occasion time when a cop / someone else who has info speaks out day 1, but that rarely happens. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Neo
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2003 5:02 am Post subject: 87 |
|
|
| Oh, shit! Sorry about the emails, I've been swamped and hadn't checked that account for a while. I'll get right on it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Faeriefire
Hot
|
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2003 8:53 am Post subject: 88 |
|
|
Unvote: MacadamiamaN
What?! I'm being voted because one person, Antrax, says I crack under pressure? That's just plain silly. He could very well be mafia just picking on a less experienced player. I will not give away my role just to be played with by the mafia or any other evil characters.
But the person I find suspicious right now is ralphmerridew. That is such weak reasoning. You couldn't just write your vote off as a bandwagon? Random votes I understand, but you seem just trying to vote someone off using someone else's stupid reasoning. And you can do this because you are mafia and know that I am not.
Vote: ralphmerridew |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Leonidas
Membre Daedalien
|
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2003 9:18 am Post subject: 89 |
|
|
FOS: the FF bandwagon
vote: Antrax
Reasons:
1) Crap vote on FF,
2) You don't get the opportunity THAT often
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hitchhiker
Finally got a ride.
|
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2003 4:39 pm Post subject: 90 |
|
|
Unvote: SaberKitty
FOS: ralphmerridew and Faeriefire.
1) ralphmerridew votes what appears to be a typical, random first-day bandwagon. He wants to see if Faeriefire will "break under pressure."
2) Faeriefire OMGUS-votes ralphmerridew with the justification that, since ralphmerridew did not announce that it was a bandwagon vote, ralphmerridew must be mafia. (Huh?)
One of them (rm or FF) might know something about the other one. It's weak, I know, but it's a possibility. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ralphmerridew
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2003 5:27 pm Post subject: 91 |
|
|
| Well, I will assure everyone that at present I know nothing about any other person's role, and my vote for FF was a pure first-day bandwagon. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antrax
ESL Student
|
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2003 5:41 pm Post subject: 92 |
|
|
Okay, I'm feeling better now. One wonders why my vote is "crap" (especially as this is the first day and all). FF talked to me a while back and complained how she never manages to lie well when playing mafia on the GL. Seems like a good choice for a day one bandwagon, don't you think?
Antrax
------------------
"If it comes down to a choice between being unloved and being vulnerable and sensitive and emotional, then you can just keep your love." -Victor Mancini, "Choke" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antrax
ESL Student
|
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2003 5:45 pm Post subject: 93 |
|
|
And having noticed she posted, I'll unvote: Faeriefire and vote: Leonidas because I'm sick and tired of people using my mafia terms incorrectly
Antrax
------------------
"If it comes down to a choice between being unloved and being vulnerable and sensitive and emotional, then you can just keep your love." -Victor Mancini, "Choke" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Darkblade
Nuke the Lurkers!
|
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2003 1:00 am Post subject: 94 |
|
|
| Leonidas, what do you mean by "you don't get the opportunity that often?" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Leonidas
Membre Daedalien
|
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2003 5:44 am Post subject: 95 |
|
|
I mean Antrax does not play mafia as often as he used to. So you don't get the opportunity to vote for him often.
I'm voting for him because of his crap attack on FF - so she breaks under pressure, heh, Antrax ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antrax
ESL Student
|
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2003 7:17 am Post subject: 96 |
|
|
Yeah, when she's mafia she gets nervous people are on to her and cracks under the pressure. What's a "crap attack"? Is it something grass pokemon do?
Antrax
------------------
"If it comes down to a choice between being unloved and being vulnerable and sensitive and emotional, then you can just keep your love." -Victor Mancini, "Choke" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Corsato
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2003 7:30 am Post subject: 97 |
|
|
Maybe it's a new mafia term  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Leonidas
Membre Daedalien
|
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2003 7:31 am Post subject: 98 |
|
|
Antrax, a 'crap attack' is not something you would expect from a basic pokemon. It takes a more experienced, evolved Pokemon to target a gentle girl with such a vicious, ferocious attack.
Hence my refusal to join the FF bandwagon - and my vote for you.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ralphmerridew
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2003 4:39 pm Post subject: 99 |
|
|
Unofficial vote count:
3 FaerieFire (MacadamiaMan, rm, GARM)
2 rm (Polotet, FF)
1 SaberKitty (crackerjack)
1 Darkblade (jesternl)
1 mac (Gaspode)
1 JEEP (Dragon Phoenix)
1 jesternl (Darkblade)
1 Mackay (SaberKitty)
1 Antrax (Leo)
1 Leo (Antrax)
jeep, did you get a response from Neo? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Neo
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2003 6:18 pm Post subject: 100 |
|
|
He certainly did.
And now that the play is over (all that remains is too tear down the set today ) I should have more time for ya'll  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Neo
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sun Mar 30, 2003 6:22 pm Post subject: 101 |
|
|
marker
3 FaerieFire (GARM, MacadamiaMan, ralphmerridew)
2 ralphmerridew (Polotet, FF)
1 Antrax (Leo)
1 Darkblade (jesternl)
1 JEEP (Dragon Phoenix)
1 jesternl (Darkblade)
1 SaberKitty (crackerjack)
1 macadamiaMan (Gaspode)
1 Mackay (SaberKitty)
1 Leo (Antrax
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antrax
ESL Student
|
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2003 7:21 pm Post subject: 102 |
|
|
So let's see what makes this attack so crappy. I have argued the following case:
FF is more likely than others to break under pressure (true)
There is nothing better to go on (true)
-----
She would make a fine day 1 target.
This is, of course, "crap", because you said so, and we all know your mafia expertise is second to none. For example, just look at YOUR brilliant plan:
1) Idle.
2) Attack someone who's actually doing something, with no substance.
Damn, I wish I could play as well as you. Teach me, master. How do I make my attacks less crappy and more content-filled, like yours?
(and why is nobody else posting? Leonidas got your tongue?)
Antrax
------------------
"If it comes down to a choice between being unloved and being vulnerable and sensitive and emotional, then you can just keep your love." -Victor Mancini, "Choke" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jeep
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2003 10:22 pm Post subject: 103 |
|
|
Hmm... I will apply a little pressure with vote: FaerieF.
-JEEP |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MacadamiamaN
Intentionally left blank
|
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2003 10:25 pm Post subject: 104 |
|
|
bah.. I have been notified that my vote is no longer random and must be randomized.
Unvote: FaerieFire
Vote: Eon |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jeep
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Mar 31, 2003 11:28 pm Post subject: 105 |
|
|
How can a vote become no longer random? Either it was random when it was generated or it wasn't. Whatever happens after that doesn't change the fact that it was randomly generated and therefore was a random vote... *shrug*
-JEEP |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Neo
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Apr 01, 2003 1:34 am Post subject: 106 |
|
|
| Deadline extended 24 hours from this post. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Vegtable2001
Immobile Member
|
Posted: Tue Apr 01, 2003 1:43 am Post subject: 107 |
|
|
| I'm sorry, but this reaks of one of macnuts fake role claims. For those who don't know, every so often he'l do a random role claim, whether town or mafia, just to make things interesting or something. I'm going to Vote Mac because i think the entire sudden stop of the random vote thing is kinda sketchy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Faeriefire
Hot
|
Posted: Tue Apr 01, 2003 2:20 am Post subject: 108 |
|
|
Alright, I would highly recommend unvoting me. I am protown. I have a bad feeling about revealing my role so soon, but . . .
I'm a schizophrenic. I am doctor, cop, plain townie, and vigilante on different nights. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Polotet
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Apr 01, 2003 3:21 am Post subject: 109 |
|
|
| Every role comes from a past game. What's your role, and what game is it from? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antrax
ESL Student
|
Posted: Tue Apr 01, 2003 3:38 am Post subject: 110 |
|
|
I've heard that role idea in the past. Dunno if it was ever used. For the record, I was off her ever since she posted, her post had no indication of mafia-ness. Too bad she claimed.
Antrax
------------------
"If it comes down to a choice between being unloved and being vulnerable and sensitive and emotional, then you can just keep your love." -Victor Mancini, "Choke" |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hitchhiker
Finally got a ride.
|
Posted: Tue Apr 01, 2003 4:12 am Post subject: 111 |
|
|
| The role FF claimed is from Greifswald mafia, if I remember correctly. It was a pro-town role. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
GARM
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Apr 01, 2003 8:37 am Post subject: 112 |
|
|
Ok, Next
Unvote: FF
Vote: ralphmerridew
Originally posted by Antrax: For the record, I was off her ever since she posted
Nice to see you got something right for a change Antrax.
GARM |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MacadamiamaN
Intentionally left blank
|
Posted: Tue Apr 01, 2003 11:32 am Post subject: 113 |
|
|
I didn't divulge the technicalities of my role, which include that fact that a "random" vote can't land on a bandwagon. Sorry, thought that was obvious...
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ralphmerridew
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Tue Apr 01, 2003 1:15 pm Post subject: 114 |
|
|
IIRC, the schizo from Griefswald had an SK role, not vigi, and the SK became more & more frequent as the game went on, but for now that role is town. Unvote: FF
I'd rather not claim my role at present, but I will say that I believe it is more useful to the town than the roles claimed by FF or MacmaN, although it has a definite weakness. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Vegtable2001
Immobile Member
|
Posted: Tue Apr 01, 2003 7:34 pm Post subject: 115 |
|
|
| I assume you could at least tell us what game your role is from macnut? Anyone remember a game where a person had a role where they were required to random vote? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MacadamiamaN
Intentionally left blank
|
Posted: Tue Apr 01, 2003 8:05 pm Post subject: 116 |
|
|
| I would assume it would be from a Simpsons-themed mafia game. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MacadamiamaN
Intentionally left blank
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Darkblade
Nuke the Lurkers!
|
Posted: Tue Apr 01, 2003 8:16 pm Post subject: 118 |
|
|
UNVOTE: jerternl
VOTE: Mac
I agree with Vegetable2001 on this point. This does sound like a made up role. Mac's role is a little TOO convienient. First off, he would be important to the town later, meaning that the town would dare lynch him and would probably protect him. Also, since he says he's powerless now, SK's wouldn't go after him, and he wouldn't have to give fake results. Mac has claimed cop in too many games. He bound to be lying in several of them. Also, underling cops have always known the superior cops in every game I've seen. MAc's claim that he doesn't know who the superior cop just further highlights Mac's scumminess |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MacadamiamaN
Intentionally left blank
|
Posted: Tue Apr 01, 2003 8:24 pm Post subject: 119 |
|
|
I was a "retired cop" in the Mini Game Q1. I didn't know of a superior cop, but, when he died the first night (rather conviniently), I took his place.
This is almost that exact role, except that this time, I have to keep my vote random and bandwagon-less. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Vegtable2001
Immobile Member
|
Posted: Tue Apr 01, 2003 8:27 pm Post subject: 120 |
|
|
Ralph Wiggum
Ralph is essentially the village idiot. His vote is random until his father dies. At that point he inherits his father’s information and can vote as he pleases.
Did anyone look that far back for their roles? I would be much happier if somone claimed to have sent that, though that wouldn't be confirmation of anything. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|