| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Should we have HTML table tags? |
| Yes. |
|
13% |
[ 4 ] |
| Yes, but coded as BB codes |
|
43% |
[ 13 ] |
| No. |
|
43% |
[ 13 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 30 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Antrax
ESL Student
|
Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2004 5:17 pm Post subject: 1 |
|
|
On the GL we had support for HTML table tags. Should this be re-done on these forums as well?
(Please note that table tags are a lot of work to implement, and pose a potential security hazard) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Porro
Cool as a cucumber
|
Posted: Tue Jun 22, 2004 9:37 pm Post subject: 2 |
|
|
Why bother? _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Samadhi
+1
|
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2004 12:42 am Post subject: 3 |
|
|
| Is there another option for doing something like was set up in the Baseball Draft thread in VG? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Beartalon
'Party line' kind of guy
|
Posted: Wed Jun 23, 2004 1:53 am Post subject: 4 |
|
|
Only implement table tags as non-HTML for simple tables.
If HTML tables are what you need for a game, open an account on glpics and link to the page through that? _________________ Shun the unbeliever... SHUUUUUUUUUUUUUUN-NUH |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Cordelia
Daedelia Member
|
Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2004 7:11 am Post subject: 5 |
|
|
| At the risk of sounding like a greedy-want-it-all, why not? (as opposed to "why bother?") It's certainly not a pressing issue, but it's also a nice utility that I have had the opportunity to use. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antrax
ESL Student
|
Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2004 8:31 am Post subject: 6 |
|
|
Because all it takes is someone posting "</td>" and the layout is screwed. So we'll have to add code to make sure it's a complete table and not something malicious, which would slow down the GL on every posting, and might be incomplete, so one day you may wake up and find out the GL is broken, etc.
Antrax _________________ After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Samadhi
+1
|
Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2004 11:29 am Post subject: 7 |
|
|
Would it be possible to have a translation?
Instead of </td> use [/td], in much the same way that all the other similar [] commands have their <> analogs.
Not that I know PHP but it seems there is already a translation process and it already checks for matching (open/close) tags. _________________ And he lived happily ever after. Except for the dieing at the end and the heartbreak in between. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pikachamp
swore in chat!
|
Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2004 1:38 pm Post subject: 8 |
|
|
| The original reason for using "<>" ytags is so you could easily copy and paste a table from another webpage's code. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antrax
ESL Student
|
Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2004 1:48 pm Post subject: 9 |
|
|
Samadhi, see the poll option for "yes, but implement as UBB tags"?
Antrax _________________ After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Samadhi
+1
|
Posted: Sat Jun 26, 2004 9:13 pm Post subject: 10 |
|
|
Antrax: Bah.
Pika, it's pretty easy to ctrl-h _________________ And he lived happily ever after. Except for the dieing at the end and the heartbreak in between. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
shadyforce
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sun Jun 27, 2004 1:37 am Post subject: 11 |
|
|
| Table tags would be handy but I understand the problem if security. Perhaps a compromise could be reached? If [table] is more secure than <table> then use that. It's easy enough to copy something into notepad and use the 'Replace...' function to convert. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pikachamp
swore in chat!
|
Posted: Sun Jun 27, 2004 11:17 pm Post subject: 12 |
|
|
| I think the original coding let any htmnl code work as long as it was in a table, something that wouldn't quite work with UBB codes. Then again, maybe that's not such a good idea. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|