|
|
|
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Sat Oct 08, 2005 3:39 am Post subject: 201 |
|
|
| If they want to go to Heaven, yes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
flaming hellbound homo
Guest
|
Posted: Sat Oct 08, 2005 3:53 am Post subject: 202 |
|
|
| What exactly would God/Allah have against sodomy anyway? If two consenting adults want to play plumber where is the harm in it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wordcross

|
Posted: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:11 am Post subject: 203 |
|
|
| Samadhi wrote: |
| Quote: |
Do you feel there will ever be peace in the Middle East as long as Israel is around?
|
Why? |
A) Your quote tags are inside out.
B) I just don't think that Muslims, especially those in the region, will ever accept Jewish control of lands that are right in the middle of the Middle-East, especially with Jerusalem in question.
BTW...I perceive you as a moderate to liberal muslim, and I am VERY spooked by the fact that you think there can be no peace with Israel, and that the Constitution should be overruled by Islamic law.
My response that there will be no peace with Israel has little to do with my personal preferences. I don't think that there shouldn't be peace, only that i find it unlikely that there ever will be.
And why shouldn't I be in support of Islamic Law over *any* manmade system? I've said many times that Islam comes with a complete set of rules for society, including systems for education, a judiciary, politics, international relations, economics, etc. So, from an Islamic point of view, which is better, God's laws, or manmade laws?
Again, though, I think it foolish to even consider trying to convince Americans to adopt Islamic law. It would be wasted time that could be better spent elsewhere.
If the entire Middle East banded together to form one large Muslim state, then declaired war on the USA, who's side would you take?
That depends on *why* the unified Muslim Countries combined. If they banded because they believe that muslims should all be together in one unified Islamic State, ruled by Islamic Law, because that's what we're supposed to be doing, then good.
But:
A) I sincerely doubt any such thing would come close to happening, most especially for those reasons, within mylifetime.
and
B) Unless there was some justified reason for declaring war on the US (not just because America is "evil"), I would have serious problems with that, would question the motive for unification, and would stay out of it.
I also doubt I'd ever be on the US side either. If such a ridiculous thing happened, I'd move to Canada, forefit my American Citizenship, and stay out of it.
If the GL banded together and was neutral of either the USA or the Muslims, what would you do?
Assume that Borodog conscripted you all and that I'm next
What exactly do you mean by "no such thing as gay rights?"
For everything, or just marriage? Can a gay Muslim still worship in a mosque?
Okay, let me explain this again. From an Islamic point of view, no one is "born gay", nor does God "make you gay." Homosexuality is a product of nurture, not nature.
Therefore, as homosexuality is not allowed, there is nothing else to say about it. If you're a Muslim and you think you're gay, tough. Get over it.
Also, if someone in a Muslim country but who is not Muslim dances in public, what do you do with him?
Not much of anything, I reckon, besides perhaps urge him/her to stop. It's not *that* big a deal. Maybe if they were organizing a large public dance contest or something, there'd be more serious consequences. _________________ Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Omega Centauri
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:22 am Post subject: 204 |
|
|
And exactly what consequences are we talking about?
What would be the consequences of dancing in public, or of eating pork in public, or of being a woman and wearing shorts and a T shirt, or kissing another guy/girl in public?
Death penalty? Torture? Jail time? Fine? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wordcross

|
Posted: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:37 am Post subject: 205 |
|
|
none of those would be death-penalty serious. Torture is forbidden in Islam. Jailtime maybe. Fines more likely.
I think the order of seriousness, from lowest to highest would be: dancing, eating pork, improper dress, then the same-sex kissing. The latter would be the one most likely to land you in a great deal of trouble. _________________ Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Samadhi
+1
|
Posted: Sat Oct 08, 2005 5:28 am Post subject: 206 |
|
|
Thanks for the answers, it makes me understand more. I did have two earlier questions just before that that you missed.
In re the whole gay thing, here's a hypothetical: Suppose science proved that there was a gene or whatever that caused a man to be attracted to others in the manner that women are (I.E. gay), what would your position be then? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
casinopete
Emergency Backup Antrax
|
Posted: Sat Oct 08, 2005 5:36 am Post subject: 207 |
|
|
Jedo: Pretend posts 200 and 201 showed up in the Christianity thread. How would you react?
Samadhi: See post 121 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
casinopete
Emergency Backup Antrax
|
Posted: Sat Oct 08, 2005 5:39 am Post subject: 208 |
|
|
hehe. and post 120, for that matter.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Samadhi
+1
|
Posted: Sat Oct 08, 2005 5:54 am Post subject: 209 |
|
|
Thanks CP. I was wondering if I'd get something better than "that can't happen" this time.
It's a hypothetical. Assume it to be true. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wordcross

|
Posted: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:02 pm Post subject: 210 |
|
|
My Apologies for Forgetting these
Does Islam believe in Satan? (besides the US I mean)
If yes, what's his story?
Yes, Muslims do believe in Satan
In Heaven, before God created mankind (Adam) there were the Angels and the Jinn. The Angels, beings of Light, are servants of God and have no free will. The Jinn, beings of fire, are more like men. They have free will to choose between what is right and wrong.
One of the Jinn, Iblis (pronounced: ib-lease) was one of God's best followers, and had a position of honour in God's court.
When God had completed the creation of the universe (2-29), He announced that He would create a Khalifa (vicegerent) on Earth, causing the angels to ask how He intended to place on earth one who shall make mischief and shed blood while they hymn His praise and sanctify Him. God answered that He knows what they do not (2-30).
So Allah created Adam and gave him from His knowledge what no other creature of his possessed, by teaching him the names of everything. He then presented them to the angels, and demanded that they tell the names (2-30), knowing that they would fail.
After the angels admitted that they have no knowledge except what He had given them (2-30), Allah commanded Adam to display his knowledge in front of the angels (2-33), and when Adam did, God commanded the angels to prostrate before Adam.
The angels all bowed, but Iblis did not, and disobeyed God. God asked him "Why do you not bow, as I have commanded?" Iblis says "You have made me of fire, and made him of clay. I am the superior being, and i will not bow to such as he!"
And so, for his arrogance and disobedience, God condemned Iblis to Hell. Iblis challenged God, however, to give him time to try and lure mankind into sin and damnation. He claimed that since mankind was such a weak creation, he would be able to influence them easily and turn them away from God's path, that they would join him in Hell on the day of judgement. God agreed to this, knowing that the power of Shaitan was of no consequence compared to the might of God.
And so Shaitan convinces Adam and Eve to disobey God, for which they are cast out of Paradise onto the Earth.
How do you feel about a recent ban in England covering all work pictures and knick-knacks of novelty pigs and "pig-related items" due to a Muslim workers complaint (this includes a novelty tissue box with Winnie the Pooh and Piglet on the exterior)?
I find it odd that England would agree to such a thing. And whoever complained about this in the first place is an idiot. Why should they expect a non-Islamic country to care if there are pictures of pigs in the workplace? What if the Hindus started complaining about people who eat beef at work? Will England ban meat from the workplace?
And now that i really think about it, there is no prohibition in Islam of pictures of pigs, or, so far as i know, even keeping pigs as pets. So whoever complained about it is doubly an idiot.
Mustafa Kamal? is that Ataturk? if so How Do modern day Turks reconcile the fact that he is a national hero with the fact that he is a religous traitor
Yeah, same guy.
Turkey is one of the most nationalistic countries with a sizeable Muslim population. They praise Ataturk as a founder or some other such idea (I'm not entirely versed on the reasons) despite the fact that he agreed to disband the Islamic State in order to do it.
And really, as a general rule, Turkey is a *very* poor indicator of what Islam should be, and often is, in other parts of the world. _________________ Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wordcross

|
Posted: Sat Oct 08, 2005 4:06 pm Post subject: 211 |
|
|
In re the whole gay thing, here's a hypothetical: Suppose science proved that there was a gene or whatever that caused a man to be attracted to others in the manner that women are (I.E. gay), what would your position be then?
Skepticism, most likely, but outside of that, I couldn't say. It would obviously be difficult to reconcile belief with this "proof" so it would take a lot of personal reflection on what's what.
Ask me if it actually happens (which it won't)  _________________ Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2005 4:34 pm Post subject: 212 |
|
|
| Quote: |
| And so Shaitan convinces Adam and Eve to disobey God, for which they are cast out of Paradise onto the Earth. |
By why did God punish them? At that time they didn't know the difference between good and bad did they? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dethwing
DeTheeThaw
|
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2005 7:58 pm Post subject: 213 |
|
|
What sort of reasons do you have for believing in God and/or the Qu'ran?(Sorry if I have mispelled it)
Or if you prefer to keep things abstract instead of personal, what are the "accepted" reasons for believing in the Qu'ran and God?
Aside from simply "not accepting it" based on your Islamic beliefs, what sort of reasons do you have for not believing in the Bible?
Perhaps this would be better suited for your hot seat, but I figured I would have a go at them here. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wordcross

|
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:17 pm Post subject: 214 |
|
|
| Anonymous wrote: |
| Quote: |
| And so Shaitan convinces Adam and Eve to disobey God, for which they are cast out of Paradise onto the Earth. |
By why did God punish them? At that time they didn't know the difference between good and bad did they? |
Why shouldn't they have known the difference between good and bad? They knew very well that they weren't supposed to eat from the forbidden tree. They disobeyed, and so were punished for it. _________________ Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chuck
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Mon Oct 10, 2005 8:52 pm Post subject: 215 |
|
|
| They didn't know they weren't supposed to eat the apple. After God told them not to, one of His creations came to them and said it was all right to do so. Since God had never lied to them they wouldn't know what a lie was and would accept everything that was told to them as true. They couldn't possibly know that it was wrong. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2005 3:46 am Post subject: 216 |
|
|
cp: If those two posts were in the Christianity thread? Hmm... Well, I'm not sure. God presents in Leviticus 18 all kinds of immoral sexual practices, and homosexuality was punished in Soddam and Ghommorah, but seeing as God's forgiving nature, I'm not really sure. They would certainly have to be repentant if they acted upon it (or "commited adultery in their minds"), but when this repenting would have to happen is up in the air. Well... *grrr*
I had a thought the other day. God cannot tolerate sin, so there is obviously no sin in heaven. Sin, is an earthly pleasure that people enjoy and must love to a certain extent. Like Jesus said, no man can serve two masters, so if homosexuals love homosexuality so much that they don't have room for God and choose it over God, then I don't think they will go to heaven. However, if when the time comes to choose between the two (God or their sin), I think that because of Jesus' sacrifice, they can choose God over that sin (homosexuality in this case). Understand what I'm saying?
Sorry for using up the Islam thread, word. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2005 2:25 pm Post subject: 217 |
|
|
| word, if you are wrong about Islam and I am correct about Christianity and you are given the choice to enter heaven (which I believe you are anyway), would you take it despite knowing that you were wrong? (Not meant to be plagarizing.) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wordcross

|
Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2005 6:41 pm Post subject: 218 |
|
|
Dethwing: I haven't forgotten you. I'm thinking
If you are wrong about Islam and I am correct about Christianity and you are given the choice to enter heaven (which I believe you are anyway), would you take it despite knowing that you were wrong? (Not meant to be plagarizing.)
You mean patronizing, not plagiarizing
And of course i'd choose heaven. No one would willingly choose to go to hell when faced with the reality of that torment.
The question is, of course, merely hypothetical  _________________ Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jedo the Jedi
Paragon in Training
|
Posted: Sat Oct 15, 2005 10:39 pm Post subject: 219 |
|
|
| Please excuse my brain fart. It's been a long, busy day. (Set construction is a bear!) And yes, hypothetical. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
extro…
Guest
|
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 2:05 pm Post subject: 220 |
|
|
Was looking at the new Iraqi constitution. Question: Do the following provisions conflict with each other?
| Quote: |
SECTION ONE: FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES
Article 2:
First: Islam is the official religion of the State and it is a fundamental source of legislation:
A. No law that contradicts the established provisions of Islam may be established.
B. No law that contradicts the principles of democracy may be established.
C. No law that contradicts the rights and basic freedoms stipulated in this constitution may be established.
|
| Quote: |
SECTION TWO: RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES
CHAPTER ONE: RIGHTS
FIRST: Civil and Political Rights
Article 14:
Iraqis are equal before the law without discrimination based on gender, race, ethnicity, origin, color, religion, creed, belief or opinion, or economic and social status.
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wordcross

|
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 2:49 pm Post subject: 221 |
|
|
I wouldn't say that they conflict with each other, no.
However, depending on their definition of "principles of Democracy", A and B might conflict. And I'm willing to bet that, when all is said and done, A and C are likely to conflict. _________________ Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Samadhi
+1
|
Posted: Mon Oct 17, 2005 3:27 pm Post subject: 222 |
|
|
Under Islamic laws are Christians allowed to practice their religion in public? _________________ And he lived happily ever after. Except for the dieing at the end and the heartbreak in between. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wordcross

|
Posted: Tue Oct 18, 2005 2:22 pm Post subject: 223 |
|
|
depends. They're allowed to have churches and chapels and whatnot, which is a sort of public, but I'm not so sure they'd be allowed to have stuff going on at a big outdoor public place, like the town square or whatever. Individually, a person would be allowed to do whatever they needed according to his religion, so long as it wasn't illegal. And as long as their not publicly preaching. _________________ Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Samadhi
+1
|
Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2005 1:28 am Post subject: 224 |
|
|
Well that would kind of invalidate the "Iraqis are equal before the law without discrimination based on gender, race, ethnicity, origin, color, religion, creed, belief or opinion, or economic and social status." Part _________________ And he lived happily ever after. Except for the dieing at the end and the heartbreak in between. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wordcross*
Guest
|
Posted: Thu Oct 20, 2005 2:40 pm Post subject: 225 |
|
|
yes, yes it would. I wasn't paying enough attention to that, thanks  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Agamemnon
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2005 8:09 pm Post subject: 226 |
|
|
| Quote: |
How do you feel about a recent ban in England covering all work pictures and knick-knacks of novelty pigs and "pig-related items" due to a Muslim workers complaint (this includes a novelty tissue box with Winnie the Pooh and Piglet on the exterior)?
I find it odd that England would agree to such a thing. And whoever complained about this in the first place is an idiot. Why should they expect a non-Islamic country to care if there are pictures of pigs in the workplace? |
Let me tell you why this is. Here in Blighty the Muslim community make the most noise. Now don't get me wrong here, I'm not starting any racism or facist mumblings, but it's true.
We have many mixed races and religeons, all co-habitating together in a fairly peaceful way. Problem is that the large Muslim communities around the Isle have a tendancy of speaking out against anything thats threatens their beliefs. But, they don't just have a general whinge, they bring in the big guns of the British Muslim council, the Mosques, and every other high ranking Muslim clerics available. And our Government, because of the unsettled nature of the middle east v the devil worshipping west, always bow down to their requests no matter what, just to keep some form of peace.
You probably think I'm making this up as I go along, but I assure you I'm not. It's the way it has become here. Whenever there is a racial problem concerning something insulting or deframing another religeon, it's always the Main Muslim leaders doing all the shouting. This. I'm afraid, is one of the reasons why racial attacks happen against the Muslim communities far more times than any other in this country.
Where I live, there is a large Sikh community. At the moment, they are in the process of building a new larger temple for their faith to prey in. This has had no financial backing form authorities whatsoever, entirely backed and funded by the local Sikh community themselves.
We also have a small Buddhists sect. They have just aquired a building, through their own funding, for use of their meetings and teachings.
Now we have a small Muslim cumminity, they have been given a building to be used as a mosque. It was not funded by them, nor was it bought by them. Instead, the local head cleric and his followers DEMANDED to be given a place to prey, if not, then they threatened to take our local council to the European courts of law, stating that they were DENIED a holy place to preach their faith.
This or course, started a racial problem between the white community and the Sikh community against the Muslims.
So Word I ask this..........are you aware of the clout your religeon has when dealing with other Western cultures and authorities, especially since all the western involvement in the Middle East?
Would you agree if Europe decided to ban public religeous practises of the Muslim faith, much the same as Muslim countries have with Western faiths?
I'm sorry if I went off track a bit in parts, but I was just trying to get the idea over, all be it longwinded. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dethwing
DeTheeThaw
|
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 5:47 pm Post subject: 227 |
|
|
Still thinking?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wordcross

|
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 6:26 pm Post subject: 228 |
|
|
yeah, sorta. I'm now just procrastinating
I'm hoping to get around to answering it this evening. stay tuned  _________________ Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
extro...
Guest
|
Posted: Tue Oct 25, 2005 10:00 pm Post subject: 229 |
|
|
| Agamemnon wrote: |
| Let me tell you why this is. Here in Blighty the Muslim community make the most noise. ... |
Perhaps somewhat related, from CNN ...
| Quote: |
The BBC World Service has announced it is to set up a new Arabic television channel, in what it describes as its "biggest transformation in 70 years."
The World Service says it will close 10 language services to fund the new station. BBC radio broadcasts in Bulgarian, Croatian, Czech, Greek, Hungarian, Kazakh, Polish, Slovak, Slovene and Thai will cease by March next year. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Samadhi
+1
|
Posted: Wed Oct 26, 2005 4:59 am Post subject: 230 |
|
|
| Quote: |
| This. I'm afraid, is one of the reasons why racial attacks happen against the Muslim communities far more times than any other in this country. |
I'd like to see some stats on that. The perception in America is that muslims are victims of "far more" attacks, but that's not the case. _________________ And he lived happily ever after. Except for the dieing at the end and the heartbreak in between. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Red Shadow
Guest
|
Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 4:25 am Post subject: 231 |
|
|
This is going to sound bad, but I've been dealing with a problem with my sexual orientation over the past several years. I'm in my lates teens now, and I'm from a family with a Baptist leaning (in fact, my grandfather was a Baptist preacher). I think the earliest indication of my problem, although I didn't recongnize it as such at the time, was when I was only five. So I really don't know how I got to be the way I was, or if it was due to something I chose, but I find that unlikely. At any rate, I was extremly depressed and at the end of my rope, I hated the way I was but I didn't think I could change. I resisted my temptations very strongly but that never helped. But finally, I told my dad, and he was very helpful. It turns out, he'd known a man who had been a homosexual but had been instantly changed when he listened to God telling him to confess his problem to his employers at the Mission Board (imagine that, he was a missionary at the time!).
So Dad got me to a Christian psychologist who told me that it wasn't my fault I was the way I was, but also that I didn't have to stay that way. As it turns out, sexuality is a learned behavior. Somewhere in my childhood I had learned to attatch my attraction to something other than the opposite gender, and it had become reinforced before I knew what it was. But, it can also be changed. I have been working on changing for about two years now, I think. I'm not quite thru, but I'm most of the way. But it was a real surprize to hear that sexuality isn't inborn. It works by association.
Anyway, I think it's terrible that some people think they have to be stuck being homosexual and are trying to defend themselves. I'm sure it's much less desirable than normal relations, and of course it does no good in having a family. I think the more kids who have the same sort of situation as me, and can be helped instead of indoctrinated into becoming a "victimized minority", the better.
So I hope that clears things up a bit. As for it being a sin, I'm not sure, but it doesn't really matter to me b/c I'd rather be straight than not and it seems like any homosexual who is more worried about happiness in life than "gay pride" would agree. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Samadhi
+1
|
Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 4:49 am Post subject: 232 |
|
|
1: I think this belongs in the Christianity thread..
2: It's a good thing to know that heterosexuals could be homos if they just wanted to _________________ And he lived happily ever after. Except for the dieing at the end and the heartbreak in between. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
LGB
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 9:58 am Post subject: 233 |
|
|
Red Shadow. It sounds like a terrible situation you are in. I have every sympathy for you. In my job, I often have to give advice to people like yourself, albeit not from a religous perspective. I meet many young men who wish to turn form homosexuality to hetrosexuality. The advice I usually give is to make the transition gradually. Start by making small changes in your sexual behaviour in terms of orientation. A good start is to start masturbating with your other hand. This helps your mind to adjust to stimulus from 'the other side'. Gradually choose the things men and women have in common, and learn to appreciate them equally in both sexes, eyes or bottoms for example, even flat chested girls. Eventually when you feel ready to have sex with a girl, try anal sex first, this will help you to feel more 'at home' with inter-sex sex.
I hope this will help you with your self-improvement and that you will be cured soon. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
The Red Shadow
Guest
|
Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 12:41 pm Post subject: 234 |
|
|
Samadhi: I think you are probably right about this belonging in the Christianity thread. However, the discussion there has moved away from that topic, if it did come up.
I assume you meant to say "homo's can become hetero's" but I do think it can go both ways.
LGB: Fortunately, my experience hasn't been as bad as the one you described, but thanks for the sympathy anyway. (The worst part for me, though, was before I knew it was possible to change. If there's anything that will give you low self-esteem problems, I think that's it.) I suppose I ought to have clarified, but I didn't want to if I didn't have to: I was attracted to a class of inanimate objects, which are not possible to 'have relations with' if you see what I mean. But I did have to use a gradual process of changing what I associated attractiveness with. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Hero
Guest
|
Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 1:00 pm Post subject: 235 |
|
|
| Quote: |
| I was attracted to a class of inanimate objects |
What?? English girls???!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wordcross

|
Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 1:16 pm Post subject: 236 |
|
|
| The Red Shadow wrote: |
| Samadhi: ... I assume you meant to say "homo's can become hetero's" but I do think it can go both ways. |
no, he didn't  _________________ Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Samadhi
+1
|
Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:55 pm Post subject: 237 |
|
|
word is correct. _________________ And he lived happily ever after. Except for the dieing at the end and the heartbreak in between. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
UnheardVoice
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2005 3:19 am Post subject: 238 |
|
|
| The Red Shadow wrote: |
| So I hope that clears things up a bit. As for it being a sin, I'm not sure, but it doesn't really matter to me b/c I'd rather be straight than not and it seems like any homosexual who is more worried about happiness in life than "gay pride" would agree. |
I don't understand. There's nothing inherit in homosexuality alone that would diminish "happiness in life", besides perhaps the impossibility of children that contains both partners' genetic material, but I don't think that's too big a deal. Given then that the only difference between straight and gay is opposite sex vs. same-sex, I can't really see what would be the problem here...
Wait a second. I found it:
| The Red Shadow wrote: |
| This is going to sound bad, but I've been dealing with a problem with my sexual orientation over the past several years. I'm in my lates teens now, and I'm from a family with a Baptist leaning (in fact, my grandfather was a Baptist preacher). |
Ah, so homosexuality is a problem because religious people think it's a problem. The existence of gay people around them disturbs their social fantasy [i.e. their fantasy of how society ought to be] so much that they feel they need to discriminate and alienate them. I'm willing to bet that if the environment in this country was that people did not unjustly discriminate against gay people, then gay people would have little problems at all.
[This is opposed to, say, dyslexic people, who, even when they are treated the same as other people, still hard difficulty in school and in reading. Thus, dyslexia is a real problem.]
| The Red Shadow wrote: |
Anyway, I think it's terrible that some people think they have to be stuck being homosexual and are trying to defend themselves. |
Yes, it is sad that gay people try to defend themselves from unjust discrimination. It's better just to give up and change their identity and submit to the majority, (which will only promote the oppressors' unjust discrimination), instead fighting for what they think is right. [/sarcasm]
| The Red Shadow wrote: |
| I'm sure it's much less desirable than normal relations, and of course it does no good in having a family. |
~ "Normal". What is normal?
~ Families aren't just groups of people with similar genetics, you know.
| The Red Shadow wrote: |
| I think the more kids who have the same sort of situation as me, and can be helped instead of indoctrinated into becoming a "victimized minority", the better. |
"Helped". Helped from what? Homosexuality? But that isn't really a problem in and of itself. The reality is, gay people need to be helped from the people who treat them unfairly. You're proposing that gay people have the problem and thus need to changed. I feel that it's the discriminators who have the problem, and who in fact invented this problem, and so it should be they who should change.
[Think of this as if some mafia went around the neighborhood asking for "protection money" from little stores. The choice the mafia offers is that either the store owners pay the (unjust) "protection fee", or don't pay the protection fee and stay unprotected... from the mafia. You wouldn't blame the store owners, who you? For a problem that really needn't be there in the first place?]
And finally: gay people wouldn't be "indoctrinated" into becoming a victimized minority if they weren't a victimized minority to begin with. The notion of gay pride wouldn't exist without people degrading gay people in the first place. They are a victimized minority; although it's true that sometimes minorities are taught to remain victimized and to act victimized, that doesn't change the fact that they are indeed victimized and a minority. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
UnheardVoice
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2005 3:23 am Post subject: 239 |
|
|
P.S.
Red Shadow, you're more than welcome to reintroduce the homosexuality item into the Christianity thread. Right now this item is between a series of other topics, but it's there.
P.P.S.
Sorry for hijacking the thread. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Samadhi
+1
|
Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2005 4:32 am Post subject: 240 |
|
|
UV: Nicely said. _________________ And he lived happily ever after. Except for the dieing at the end and the heartbreak in between. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
 |
The Grey Labyrinth Forum Index
-> Science, Art, and Culture |
All times are GMT Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 Next
|
| Page 6 of 9 |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
|