| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Lauritz Melchior
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2005 3:52 pm Post subject: 81 |
|
|
| extro wrote: |
| Can we just give him a title? Like "liberal douchebag"? |
Only it should be spelled "douchbag" because he can't spell it correctly. _________________ 2500th member give or take 3 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Beartalon
'Party line' kind of guy
|
Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2005 4:34 pm Post subject: 82 |
|
|
I asked him in PM "Why are you insulting without provocation?"
The reply was "Go suck a guy's dick. Faggot."
Nothing less than I expected. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lauritz Melchior
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2005 5:34 pm Post subject: 83 |
|
|
I wonder why he's so masochistic. Is the need for attention so pressing? Actually, I just answered my own question. He trolls for the attention. Hell, I love attention, but there are far better and easier ways to get it than trolling. _________________ 2500th member give or take 3 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antrax
ESL Student
|
Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2005 8:33 pm Post subject: 84 |
|
|
If it's all the same to you, I'd like to talk to him before banning him. _________________ After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
extro...
Guest
|
Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2005 8:49 pm Post subject: 85 |
|
|
| Please do - I'd love to know how it goes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
groza528
No Place Like Home
|
Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2005 9:00 pm Post subject: 86 |
|
|
| I must say that I agree with the general concensus on this one; I was willing to let him slide a little bit, but he stepped way over the line in post 15 in the Historical Boston thread. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Samadhi
+1
|
Posted: Thu Jul 07, 2005 10:55 pm Post subject: 87 |
|
|
| I was favoring ignoring him, but his comment in the "Several injured in London blasts" thread has decided me in favor of banning. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jeep
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 4:44 am Post subject: 88 |
|
|
Are we certain it was him? I thought it was a guest post and I didn't log in to check the IP before it was deleted. (Which I think was wrong... the content was in extremely poor taste and I can see deleting it, but the post should have been left alone for tracking purposes.)
-JEEP |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Samadhi
+1
|
Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 6:25 am Post subject: 89 |
|
|
| Another mod checked the IP before deleting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
arandomguy
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 6:32 pm Post subject: 90 |
|
|
Yeah that was me. You can ban me now. I plan to "go away" anyways but you may want to ban me to please the masses who fear I'll return. _________________ Monkeys are better dead. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antrax
ESL Student
|
Posted: Fri Jul 08, 2005 6:37 pm Post subject: 91 |
|
|
Okay, I guess. Wish it would've worked out differently. I kinda liked having an empty banlist. _________________ After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Coyote

|
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 1:52 am Post subject: 92 |
|
|
I'm not very happy about it either, but the GL has been growing a lot in the past few years, and something like this was probably inevitable. I certainly can't come up with anything to say in arg's defense, as his goal in the past month or so seems to have been purely to disrupt things. It's a pity, because if you read some of his earliest posts, he showed a bit of promise...I wonder sometimes just where things went wrong.
If it's any consolation, here's a thread from another discussion board I frequent that gives a little perspective to the 'one member banned' milestone.
Or is it a portent of things to come? I'd like to think it isn't. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lauritz of Arabia
Guest
|
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 2:25 am Post subject: 93 |
|
|
| I'm a little bit bummed out about it too, but also happy at the same time. As you said, some of his posts were worthwhile. He started the thread about Reagan being named the greatest American. Oh well. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Courk
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 2:46 am Post subject: 94 |
|
|
We can un-ban him after an unspecified period of time.
And judging by that site, we should have 16 or so banned people. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lauritz Melchior
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 3:37 am Post subject: 95 |
|
|
Well then, what are we waiting for? I nominate Samadhi. _________________ 2500th member give or take 3 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antrax
ESL Student
|
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 8:41 am Post subject: 96 |
|
|
Coyote, that looks a lot more like other boards I run/know of. The GL is quite an anomaly when it comes to rules and enforcement (surprisingly enough ). _________________ After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Samadhi
+1
|
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 9:20 am Post subject: 97 |
|
|
Is it? Maybe this is what one should expect under Libertarianism.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antrax
ESL Student
|
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 9:24 am Post subject: 98 |
|
|
It's more like an anarchy than anything else. Or enlightened dictatorship
Seriously though, I don't think it would work for any other board. _________________ After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Samadhi
+1
|
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 9:28 am Post subject: 99 |
|
|
| Sadly, I believe you're right. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Beartalon
'Party line' kind of guy
|
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 2:24 pm Post subject: 100 |
|
|
So his banning was a civil exchange? It's somewhat hard to believe given what he posted. I'm too reactive to be a mod.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
extropalopakettle
No offense, but....
|
Posted: Sat Jul 09, 2005 3:53 pm Post subject: 101 |
|
|
| Coyote wrote: |
If it's any consolation, here's a thread from another discussion board I frequent that gives a little perspective to the 'one member banned' milestone.
Or is it a portent of things to come? I'd like to think it isn't. |
But look at the number of users there:
| Quote: |
Currently Active Users: 358 (141 members and 217 guests)
Most users ever online was 2224, May 7, 2005 at 10:49 PM.
Threads: 120,807, Posts: 2,499,744, Members: 19,441 |
Maybe I'll register, just to see how long I can last. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Samadhi
+1
|
Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2005 1:09 am Post subject: 102 |
|
|
| One banned wrote: |
| Light has been banned for constantly posting off-topic, derailing topics and failing to stop upon repeated requests from the mods and admins. |
Not long.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Samadhi
+1
|
Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2005 10:12 pm Post subject: 103 |
|
|
| This one looks suspicious. I'm going to keep an eye on it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
arandomguy
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Thu Feb 09, 2006 10:07 pm Post subject: 104 |
|
|
I'm back. _________________ Monkeys are better dead. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MatthewV
Daedalian Member :_
|
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 5:32 am Post subject: 105 |
|
|
harry_33q was deactivated after a spam post in GL Puzzles (deleted)
I have his vital info if anyone cares. First post from that IP. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wordcross

|
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 5:42 am Post subject: 106 |
|
|
indeed... did randomguy's banning expire or something? _________________ Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MatthewV
Daedalian Member :_
|
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 5:43 am Post subject: 107 |
|
|
and now arandomguy  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wordcross

|
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 5:44 am Post subject: 108 |
|
|
aww, i was having fun baiting him and then ridiculing his efforts
I can't help it if feeding the trolls is so amusing  _________________ Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lauritz Melchior
Daedalian Member
|
Posted: Fri Feb 24, 2006 5:50 am Post subject: 109 |
|
|
He just doesn't get enough vegemite. Or maybe love.
Edit: I whole-heartedly support banning him again. I assumed that he would have some respect for other people upon returning from exile, but he doesn't seem to care about other people, or respect basic forum etiquette. _________________ 2500th member give or take 3 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Beartalon
'Party line' kind of guy
|
Posted: Fri Mar 03, 2006 6:03 am Post subject: 110 |
|
|
| wordcross wrote: |
| indeed... did randomguy's banning expire or something? |
Perhaps so, but my filters still block his posts. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dragon Phoenix
Judge Doom
|
Posted: Fri Mar 03, 2006 8:26 pm Post subject: 111 |
|
|
| It's back... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Samadhi
+1
|
Posted: Fri Mar 03, 2006 9:32 pm Post subject: 112 |
|
|
Yeah, Antrax is going to work on the problem last weekend. _________________ And he lived happily ever after. Except for the dieing at the end and the heartbreak in between. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antrax
ESL Student
|
Posted: Sat Mar 04, 2006 3:11 pm Post subject: 113 |
|
|
I wasn't aware the weekend came after Sunday. I'm really out of the loop, it seems. _________________ After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Samadhi
+1
|
Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2006 2:35 am Post subject: 114 |
|
|
Jeez, time is crawling for me. I could have sworn you said that last week. _________________ And he lived happily ever after. Except for the dieing at the end and the heartbreak in between. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antrax
ESL Student
|
Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2006 7:09 am Post subject: 115 |
|
|
Pretty sure I didn't -- my last two finals were on Sunday, Feb. 26. Then I had an assignment to hand in until March 1. Until then, I had no time to breathe, let alone work on the GL. Then I had to finish my match for a tournament on scum, deadline March 2. Then I had to get some stuff done at work that I neglected when I studying for my finals. Then I went to say farewell to a friend who's flying abroad for a couple of months.
Gee, I make it sound almost as though there are other things in my life than fixing the GL against registration of spambots. _________________ After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Samadhi
+1
|
Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2006 9:10 am Post subject: 116 |
|
|
You also make it sound like you can't take a joke.  _________________ And he lived happily ever after. Except for the dieing at the end and the heartbreak in between. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antrax
ESL Student
|
Posted: Sun Mar 05, 2006 8:05 pm Post subject: 117 |
|
|
Well, you were pretty convincing.
That being said, I made some changes. Let's see if it stops the plague of spambots. _________________ After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antrax
ESL Student
|
Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 8:43 am Post subject: 118 |
|
|
Apparently it's not enough. I'll read up a bit and see what answer I can come up with. _________________ After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Samadhi
+1
|
Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 9:20 am Post subject: 119 |
|
|
I'm assuming your premise that there is feedback from an unsuspecting human is correct.
To solve that, I have two thoughts:
1. Make the test image not one image, but several images set next to each other. If the bots retrieve justification images perhaps multiple images would throw them off.
2. Make registrations require authentication by a mod. I find this onorous and....unskillful, but it would certainly hinder bots.
I have no idea what your other thoughts might be, but I just thought I'd chime in. _________________ And he lived happily ever after. Except for the dieing at the end and the heartbreak in between. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Antrax
ESL Student
|
Posted: Mon Mar 06, 2006 1:47 pm Post subject: 120 |
|
|
I dislike manual account activation, but we COULD turn on the feature that requires a real email address to register. Not too crazy about it, I'll try to think of something better. _________________ After years of disappointment with get rich quick schemes, I know I'm gonna get rich with this scheme. And quick! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|